PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of advannutSearch Advances in NutritionManuscript SubmissionSubscribe to Advances in NutritionView all articlesRead published version of paper
 
Adv Nutr. 2017 January; 8(1): 165S–172S.
Published online 2017 January 11. doi:  10.3945/an.116.013672
PMCID: PMC5227981

Setting the Lipid Component of the Diet: A Work in Process1,2,3

Abstract

Some of the most relevant yet controversial issues in nutrition are those surrounding the guidelines on quality and quantity of dietary fat in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases and coronary heart diseases. Conflicting evidence questions the credibility of the previous dietary guidelines, particularly the quality of the evidence on which these recommendations were based. It is therefore important to explore the changes that have occurred in these guidelines and their influence on the adoption of different dietary patterns over time. In this review, we summarize the evolution of the fat component of the dietary guidelines, discuss controversial aspects, and highlight the areas in which additional evidence is still needed. Over the years, the scientific community has shown an obsession for calories in a diet instead of focusing on the quality of the food that makes up the diet. This is why certain authors have identified the importance of evaluating a diet focusing on diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients. This approach has been proposed in the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Keywords: dietary guidelines, dietary fat, cardiovascular diseases, dietary patterns, fat controversy

Introduction

Dietary fat, which contributes to food palatability and preservation, is an essential component of a diet, and the presence of differing types and quantities of fat is strongly associated with different culture and culinary traditions (1). Dietary fats are commonly classified according to their acyl chains and the quantity of links, and are divided into either SFAs or unsaturated FAs. Unsaturated FAs are divided further into MUFAs, PUFAs (including ω-3, ω-6, and certain ω-9 FAs), and trans FAs, which are initially unsaturated, but become saturated when they are hydrogenated to give them a solid form (2). Foods contain a mixture of various classes of FAs (saturated and unsaturated fats), limiting the ability of experts to classify any particular FA as a healthy or unhealthy dietary choice with respect to coronary disease risk. Thus, the effects of the consumption of a food product on human health should be measured instead of being predicted from its nutrient composition (3). Consequently, a recommendation based on the proportions of nutrients in a food item could be inaccurate (4).

For many decades, the etiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD)4 was associated with the consumption of dietary fats, in particular saturated fat, which was found to increase LDL cholesterol (5). Saturated fat represents a highly heterogeneous category of FAs, with chain lengths ranging from 6 to 24 carbons. These include stearic (18:0), palmitic (16:0), myristic (14:0), and lauric (12:0) acids. The main foods that contain SFAs are palm and coconut oil, although others foods, such as dairy products (cheese, milk, yogurt, and butter), meats (pork, poultry, fish, and red and processed meats), vegetable oils, and nuts, also may contain saturated fat. Nevertheless, these foods also may contain MUFAs or PUFAs (6). Certain products that contain saturated fat, such as dairy products, nuts, and vegetable oils, actually may promote better cardiovascular health; in the past, the presence of metabolic diseases was thought to be related to increased SFA intake (7). Evidence regarding the association of health outcomes with the long-term intake of various dietary fats has generated controversy. As a result, there have been differing postures regarding the recommendations on fat consumption. Consequently, current dietary guidelines emphasize the quality, rather than the quantity, of dietary fats (8) (Table 1).

TABLE 1
Key messages

History of the Dietary Guidelines and Current Status: the Fat Controversy

The theory that an increased dietary intake of saturated fats and cholesterol results in an increase in serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol—and therefore an increase in the risk of heart disease—has been accepted since the Framingham Heart Study (9). The study reported that high serum cholesterol was a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) (10). Several other studies along the same vein were published in the early 1950s. Kritchevsky (11) showed that concentrations of certain lipoprotein classes were related to atherosclerotic heart disease, and implicated dietary fat as a factor in this relation. After this, Keys (12) examined the association between diet and CVD in different countries in the Seven Countries Study. This study revealed that countries in which fat consumption was the highest had the most heart disease, supporting the hypothesis that dietary fat was an important factor in causing heart disease. This observational study gained massive media attention and had a major influence on the dietary guidelines over the following decades. Nevertheless, this theory is still in question years later, largely because of the methodology used and the conclusions that were drawn as a result.

The first formal recommendations regarding the consumption of dietary fat for the overall population were published in 1957 by the AHA. This guideline recognized that diet plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and that the ratio of saturated and unsaturated fat, in addition to lifestyle variables such as physical activity and smoking, also could be determinant factors of the disease. However, although the guideline placed limits on fat intake, it did not distinguish between the different types of fats (13, 14). The guideline published in 1961 has a form still recognizable today: it recommends the practice of moderate-intensity exercise; the maintenance of a healthy body weight; an increase in the intake of PUFAs; and a reduction in the intake of total fat, SFAs, and cholesterol. Additional specific guidance was included in 1968, and included advice to reduce animal-fat intake and the incorporation of these dietary recommendations in the diet of the whole family, even young children (11).

Subsequently, in 1977, the US Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs recommended the following: a reduction in overall fat intake from 40% to 30% of caloric intake; a reduction in calories from SFA to <10% of total caloric intake and maintenance of the ratio of SFA, MUFA, and PUFA consumption, with a contribution of 10% for each; a reduction in total cholesterol intake to <300 mg/d; lower consumption of simple sugars (≤15% of carbohydrate intake); and a reduction in salt consumption to ≤3 g/d. In essence, the dietary goals were to eat less fat, cholesterol, and refined and processed sugars, and to eat more complex carbohydrates, vegetables, fruits, and whole grains. These guidelines effectively proposed an increase in the consumption of carbohydrates to between 40% and 60% of total energy intake (15).

All of the above recommendations appeared to be consistent with observational studies, in which the dietary intake of specific types of fat, particularly SFAs, tended to be positively correlated with CAD (10, 16, 17). In addition, the Medical Research Council Soybean Oil Study (18) and LA Veterans Study (19), relevant randomized controlled studies, showed that reducing the intake of SFAs and increasing the intake of PUFAs resulted in decreased serum total cholesterol concentrations and a lower prevalence of CAD (18, 19). However, it is important to note that in the Medical Research Council Soybean Oil Study, despite the numerically fewer deaths and relapses encountered in the intervention group (diet low in fat and cholesterol) than in the control group, this result was not statistically significant (18). Furthermore, in the LA Veterans Study, there were important demographic differences between study groups; this finding led to debate regarding the validity of the results (19).

The findings of the Oslo Diet-Heart Study (20) were in line with the results reported in the LA Veterans Study (19). This study showed that a diet low in animal fats and cholesterol but rich in vegetable oil reduced serum cholesterol values on average by 29% over the 5 y study period. However, despite this change, no differences were found between groups in the incidence of death from CVD (20). In contrast, The Finnish Mental Hospital Study reported a beneficial effect on CAD morbidity (45% in men and 35% in women) associated with the use of a diet low in SFAs and cholesterol and high in PUFAs compared with a control diet referred to as a normal hospital diet (21, 22). Other studies, such as the Sydney Diet Heart Study, that were carried out around the same time did not arrive at similar conclusions when examining similar fat-restrictive diets or diets incorporating corn oil supplementation (2325). After this, attempts were made to reduce major cardiac events or reduce recurrence through the prescription of a diet low in fat and restrictive in cholesterol intake. To date, these efforts have been unclear because of mixed results.

The 2000 US diet report recommended restricting dietary fat to ≤30% of total caloric intake, with SFA constituting <10% of these calories and the daily cholesterol intake limited to <300 mg/d. This statement was widely accepted, to the point at which many international organizations adopted similar recommendations (26, 27). Subsequent guidelines in 2005 and 2010 recommended restricting total fat to 20–35% of total calorie intake. These guidelines recommended adjusting SFA consumption for adults on the basis of their LDL concentrations. For those with LDL cholesterol concentrations <130 mg/dL, SFA consumption should be <10% of calories. However, for individuals with elevated LDL cholesterol (>130 mg/dL), ≤7% of calorie intake should be derived from SFAs (28). Calories from SFAs should be replaced with calories from unsaturated fat (29). The USDA recommendations in 2010 advised consumption of <10% of calories from SFAs, with daily cholesterol intake limited to ≤300 mg/d. These recommendations also advised people to keep trans FA consumption as low as possible by limiting foods that contain synthetic sources of trans fats, such as partially hydrogenated oil, limiting other solid fats, and reducing the intake of calories from added sugars, as well as reducing sodium intake (30). Changes in SFA intake were identified as a critical component of the actions to decrease the incidence of CAD. However, the available data provided by randomized controlled trials is scant (31). Over 40 y, it was recommended that the consumption of dietary lipids be limited to <30–35% of total calories with the difference in energy they provide being compensated for by carbohydrates. But an interesting fact is that, since the late 1970s, with the introduction of and adjustments in these dietary recommendations, rates of diabetes, obesity, and other chronic diseases have significantly increased (32).

In order to aid in the prevention of nutrition-related chronic diseases, the recommendations of the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2015) (8) emphasize the quality of food and the health outcomes associated with their regular intake. One change in the report that has received media attention is that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans did not make a recommendation on daily dietary cholesterol intake, as it had done in previous reports. The authors did not find enough scientific evidence to recommend a specific cholesterol threshold or evidence that foods containing cholesterol should be limited. The principal contribution of this document is that dietary guidelines are now based on dietary patterns and their impact on health and disease, instead of the theoretical distribution of macronutrients (5).

Although the first guidelines attempted to provide recommendations based on the evidence of their times, more recent observational and controlled dietary intervention studies have shown the need to move away from the reductionist perspective that focused on single nutrients or specific foods. Rather, dietary recommendations should take into account overall diet, food groups, and nutrients, as well as food combinations, frequency, quality, and quantity (33).

Dietary FAs and Their Impact on Health

The discrepancy in the results examining the effects of dietary fat on health can be explained by the quality of FAs contained in food (34). For decades, SFAs generally were thought to have detrimental effects on health (35); therefore, high intake of saturated fat and trans FAs from industrial sources and dairy products, especially the saturated fats 12:0, 14:0, and 16:0, was linked to an increased risk of CVD (36). Consequently, only low-fat and fat-free milk products were recommended by the dietary guidelines as part of a healthy diet in order to reduce the risk of CVD (29). However, the situation is not as clear cut now. The findings indicate that the majority of observational studies fail to show an association between the intake of dairy products and increased risk of CVD, CAD, and stroke, regardless of milk fat concentrations (3739). In addition, a recent meta-analysis of randomized studies also concluded that neither low-fat nor whole-fat dairy foods have significant effects on traditional CVD risk factors (40). These results agree with pooled analyses of observational studies that found beneficial or neutral associations between CVDs and total dairy, low-fat dairy, whole-fat dairy, milk, and cheese (41, 42). Yakoob et al. (43) studied dairy food FAs and found that the intake of the SFAs pentadecanoic acid (15:0) and heptadecanoic acid (17:0) and trans palmitoleate (t-16:1n–7) were associated with a lower incidence of diabetes. These results generally were consistent with those of Micha et al. (34), who found that SFA consumption was not linked to the incidence of diabetes. Results from short-term intervention studies on CVD biomarkers indicated that a diet higher in saturated fat from whole milk and butter increases LDL cholesterol when these are substituted for carbohydrates or unsaturated FAs; however, they may also increase HDL, and therefore might not affect or even lower the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol (44, 45). Another meta-analysis concluded that a modest increase in daily intake of dairy products may contribute to the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), even if these are whole dairy products (46). The authors found an inverse association between total dairy intake and T2DM risk in all strata except European studies and studies not adjusting for family history of T2DM. They also found a nonlinear association between total dairy product intake and T2DM, with most of the risk reduction occurring with intake up to ~200 g/d; a higher intake was associated with a further but more modest decrease in risk. The relation between obesity and overweight and intake of dairy also has been evaluated. A review showed that a majority of clinical trials in adults found a protective association between dairy consumption and overweight and obesity (47). In this review, only one study showed no protective association, and another study found a protective effect from low-fat dairy but not total dairy. This review concluded that the consumption of dairy products had no harmful effect on weight status, contrary to popular belief. The authors did not find low-fat dairy products to be more beneficial to weight status than regular-fat dairy products. With respect to results from numerous prospective observational studies and meta-analyses, not all, but most, showed no association between the intake of milk fat–containing dairy products and the risk of CVD, CAD, and stroke, although some showed an inverse relation, even with the intake of whole-dairy products (48). In addition, the Women’s Health Initiative Diet Modification Trial suggested no benefit from a reduction in SFA intake on the incidence of T2DM (49), Similar results were described in another meta-analysis by Tong et al., who found that daily consumption of dairy products had a beneficial effect in the prevention of T2DM development (50). The differences in the results between studies could be explained by dissimilarities in their methodology and population.

Studies on the effects of trans FAs suggest that increased consumption of trans FAs is strongly associated with CVD risk, systemic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction (5153). The principal food sources for trans FAs are margarine, butter, desserts, fried food, processed meat, and some fast food. It is important to keep in mind that multiple trans FA isomers exist, and the effect of each isomer is still unclear (54).

Dietary guidelines have consistently recommended replacing calories from SFAs with calories from PUFAs and MUFAs, which, for the majority of the population, come from vegetables oils. However, vegetable oils do not only contain PUFAs and MUFAs, and may actually be an important source of SFAs, as is the case of palm oil and coconut oil (55). The cardiovascular effect of these vegetable oils may vary depending on the precise combination of PUFAs, MUFAs, and SFAs (56). Also, it is important to consider how cooking can change the composition of FAs; for example, vegetable oils are typically heated to high temperatures, which induces lipid peroxidation in the PUFAs, transforming them into SFAs (57, 58).

Different types of foods contain different types of fats that are not homogeneous in their FA or cholesterol content; this heterogeneity may confer different effects on human health and disease. This may well muddy the evidence regarding the replacement of SFAs with PUFAs and MUFAs, with such replacement possibly not having a significant impact on health. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, Chowdhury et al. (59) did not find clear supporting evidence for the high consumption of PUFAs and low consumption of SFAs. This contradicts numerous previous reports, including the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea trial (60), which showed a significant inverse association between a Mediterranean diet (characterized by fats derived from PUFAs) and risk of CAD (5962). Another study conducted in Costa Rica suggested that the type of oil used for cooking and frying is more important than amount of oil used, so that a decrease in intake of saturated fat may not have a significant effect on public health (63). Indeed, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study showed that the consumption of extra-virgin olive oil was associated with a reduced risk of CVD (35). This meta-analysis, while groundbreaking, was criticized for being biased (64). There are arguments against the replacement of SFAs with carbohydrates. First, although decreased intake of SFAs lowers LDL cholesterol, it also lowers HDL cholesterol (65). A recent review by Lawrence (66) highlighted the necessity for a rational reevaluation of dietary recommendations that focus on minimizing dietary SFAs, for which the mechanisms of adverse health effects are lacking (65, 66). Second, excess intake of carbohydrates, such as starches, refined grains, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets, and fruit juice are associated with weight gain. Only vegetables, nuts, fruits, and whole grains have been associated with healthy body weight (67). In addition, a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet causes an increase in serum TGs and small, dense LDL particles; this is an atherogenic lipid profile (66).

Clinical Practice: Proportions of Total Calories or Dietary Patterns

Dietary patterns are defined as nonrandom combinations of different foods and beverages in diets determined by social or cultural factors (68). The main goal of the dietary guidelines is to provide advice and strategies to the public to optimize their food selection while taking into account the traditions and cultural resources of the users (69). Among the dietary patterns that have been studied are the Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Western, and vegetarian diets (56). The conventional DASH diet is rich in fruits and vegetables; high in potassium, magnesium, and fiber; and low in sodium and SFAs (<7% of energy). The modified DASH diet is similar to a Mediterranean diet, high in vegetable oils and low in carbohydrates. Al-Solaiman et al. (70) examined the effect of the DASH diet in obese hypertensive individuals. That study reported that the DASH diet was more effective in controlling blood pressure than was potassium, magnesium, and fiber supplementation. Evidence from observational studies and randomized controlled trials suggests that high fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a lower incidence of CAD (3, 71).

Vegetarian diets may result in substantial benefits in weight reduction and arterial blood pressure compared with nonvegetarian diets (3, 72). Several types of vegetarian diets exist, including pesco-vegetarian (includes fish), lacto-vegetarian (includes eggs and dairy products) and vegan (includes no animal products). To date, few studies have focused on these types of dietary patterns; as a consequence, possible cardiometabolic benefits have not been confirmed.

A recent review by Mozaffarian (56) highlights the importance of dietary recommendations that are focused on dietary patterns instead of particular nutrient groups (e.g., dietary fat and cholesterol intake). Previously, dietary recommendations often focused on total calories, body weight, and obesity, rather than cardiovascular and metabolic health. This review emphasizes the importance of targeting specific foods and overall dietary patterns rather than single isolated nutrients in order to maintain cardiometabolic health. Dietary priorities include increasing the intake of fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, vegetable oils, yogurt, and minimally processed whole grains; and decreasing the intake of red and processed meats and foods rich in refined grains, added sugars, salt, or trans fat.

As a result, recommendations should be adjusted to the characteristics of each target population. Knowledge should be translated into food combinations that provide enough energy and nutrients to maintain physiologic functions and normal body composition (5). Food combinations are not randomly selected: individuals set their dietary preference early in life (73). Food selections become a repetitive, predictable process in which the main sources of calories are usually limited to 20–30 products. Clusters of food can be identified with the use of factorial analyses, a useful approach to integrate the combined effects of mixed foods, instead of considering individual nutrients (74) This approach, known as “dietary patterns,” has become popular in epidemiologic studies (75). Indicators have even been developed to qualify the composition of a dietary pattern (e.g., healthy diet indicator, healthy eating index, or the Program National Nutrition Santé guideline score). The search for associations between various dietary patterns and multiple health outcomes (i.e., cognitive decline, diabetes, obesity, and neoplasia) has been a matter for several meta-analyses and systematic reviews (76).

Current guidelines have not been effective in the communication of the main messages on healthy eating patterns. Rather, the majority of these documents suggest “eating plenty of fruits, vegetables, and complex carbohydrates, and choosing foods that are lower in saturated fat, salt, and added sugar” (77). These documents are focused on achieving a caloric content and a prespecified nutrient distribution, as well as limiting the consumption of fat- or carbohydrate-enriched food products. Instead, they should consider that the intake of these products is integrated into a network that should be considered as a whole (78). Certain European governments have designed regionally adapted strategies to improve nutritional status and promote physical activity by delivering clear-cut messages (79). This approach is not focused on single components of a diet but, rather, propose a more broad line of attack to achieve a healthy dietary pattern (77).

Additional evidence to support the use of dietary patterns in guidelines and research has been provided by the Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group. This group presented data on the consumption of key dietary items over a period of 20 y in men and women with the use of 325 population-based surveys applied in 187 countries. The group assessed 2 types of dietary patterns: one reflecting the consumption of 10 healthy items (fruit, vegetables, beans and legumes, nuts and seeds, whole grains, skim milk, total PUFAs, fish, plant n–3 FAs, and dietary fiber) and the other based on unhealthy items (unprocessed red meats, processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, saturated fat, trans fat, dietary cholesterol, and sodium). Each dietary pattern was assessed for every country stratified by age, sex, and national income groups. This large amount of information allowed for the identification of trends in dietary patterns from 1990 to 2010, independent of diet quantity (caloric intake). Among countries, the largest variation was noted in the mean intake of whole grain, fruit juice, nuts and seeds, plant n–3 FAs, sugar-sweetened beverages, and processed meats. Older adults had better dietary patterns than did younger adults; the same was true for women compared with men. The report confirmed the growing trend in the consumption of unhealthy options, especially in low-income countries (80). As a result, policies are needed not only to limit the consumption of unhealthy options, but also to stimulate the intake of healthy food (56). The aim of dietary guidelines should be to provide recommendations for disease prevention, not treatment, and to propose healthy options that can feasibly be adopted by the public.

Guidelines should be translated to messages and strategies easy to implement by the population, regardless of income and education. Figures and icons (i.e., plates or pyramids) are a widely used tool to deliver the messages in an integrative manner. Aspects considered in the educational diagrams depend on the region, culture, and epidemiologic characteristics of each country. Graphic representations have been used as a visual aid in the process of dietary guidance, and images are focused on types of foods, instead of nutrients (81). In the United States, the healthy eating pyramid was published in 2008 in order to give the best possible advice to the population on healthy eating on the basis of current evidence. In 2010, the instrument was changed to have a visual representation of a plate (called MyPlate) (82). As an alternative to the USDA’s nutrition advice, the Harvard School of Public Health developed the Healthy Eating Plate in 2011. The main difference between these 2 is that the Harvard Eating Plate emphasizes the intake of whole-grain cereals, low-fat meat, poultry, fish, healthy oils, and water, and includes advice for increasing physical activity (83). Other pyramids or plates also have been developed on the basis of the Mediterranean diet and other dietary patterns. The plate icon recently has been adopted by certain Latin American countries, including Costa Rica, Uruguay, Cuba, Argentina, and Mexico (81).

Conclusion

Over the past few decades, dietary guidelines have moved from being consensus documents to becoming evidence-based recommendations. The total amount and the type of fat has been a focus of these documents for many years. Despite a lack of evidence from methodologically sound randomized controlled studies, dietary goals for fat intake have been based on the proportions of the 3 main classes of fat. In addition, the recommendations were difficult to communicate to the general public.

It is important to remember that dietary data collection is not without its flaws, in particular memory bias. This is especially important in long-term studies in which changes in diet over time, coupled with possible memory bias, may even lead to misinformation.

Long-term observational studies have provided evidence regarding the benefits and risks associated with the regular consumption of the most common food products. Moreover, these studies have found that food choices follow a common pattern that can be summarized as a single profile. It is evident that a low-fat diet is a heterogeneous food pattern and should not be considered synonymous with a healthy diet. Hence, public nutritional recommendations should leave behind the reductionist information, specifying the intake of specific amounts of macronutrients. New guidelines typically do not set a threshold for total fat and cholesterol intake. Instead, they identify the food type and frequency with which individuals may consume the main sources of fat on the basis of the best available evidence. Furthermore, recommendations should be integrated into food networks, designed to be compatible with the most common food patterns of the target population. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the health consequences of the currently recommended dietary patterns. The interpretation of epidemiologic associations should be carried out with care, because even strong associations must be confirmed by well-controlled intervention studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Armando Tovar for providing us with the opportunity to participate in this symposium. All authors were involved in the redaction of the paper, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

4Abbreviations used: CVD, cardiovascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

References

1. Sørensen LB, Møller P, Flint A, Martens M, Raben A Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003;27(10):1152–66. [PubMed]
2. Tvrzicka E, Kremmyda LS, Stankova B, Zak A Fatty acids as biocompounds: their role in human metabolism, health and disease–a review. Part 1: classification, dietary sources and biological functions. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2011;155:117–30. [PubMed]
3. Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L Components of a cardioprotective diet: new insights. Circulation 2011;123:2870–91. [PubMed]
4. Jacobs DR, Tapsell LC Food synergy: the key to a healthy diet. Proc Nutr Soc 2013;72:200–6. [PubMed]
5. Beermann C, Jelinek J, Reinecker T, Hauenschild A, Boehm G, Klör HU Short term effects of dietary medium-chain fatty acids and n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on the fat metabolism of healthy volunteers. Lipids Health Dis 2003;2:10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Mozaffarian D, Ludwig DS The 2015 US Dietary Guidelines: lifting the ban on total dietary fat. JAMA 2015;313:2421–2. [PubMed]
7. Risk and Prevention Study Collaborative Group. n-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1800–8. [PubMed]
8. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. [Internet]. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Scientific report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2015. part D, chapter 1. Food and nutrient intakes and health: current status and trends. [cited 2015 Aug 28] . Available from: http://www.health.gov/ dietary guidelines/2015 scientificreport/pdfs/scientific-report-of-the-2015- dietary-guidelines-advisory-committee. pdf.
9. Steinberg D. Thematic review series: the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy: part II: the early evidence linking hypercholesterolemia to coronary disease in humans. J Lipid Res 2005;46(2):179–90. [PubMed]
10. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, Revotskie N, Stokes J Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease: six-year followup experience. Ann Intern Med 1961;55:33–50. [PubMed]
11. Kritchevsky D. History of recommendations to the public about dietary fat. J Nutr 1998;128:449S–52S. [PubMed]
12. Keys A. Serum cholesterol response to dietary cholesterol. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;40:351–9. [PubMed]
13. Keys A, Grande F Role of dietary fat in human nutrition. III. Diet and the epidemiology of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1957;47:1520–30. [PubMed]
14. Krauss RM, Deckelbaum RJ, Ernst N, Fisher E, Howard BV, Knopp RH, Kotchen T, Lichtenstein AH, McGill HC, Pearson TA, et al. Dietary guidelines for healthy American adults. A statement for health professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1996;94(7):1795–800. [PubMed]
15. U.S. Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Dietary goals for the United States. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office; 1977.
16. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm E, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hennekens CH, Willett WC Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1491–9. [PubMed]
17. McGee DL, Reed DM, Yano K, Kagan A, Tillotson J Ten-year incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program: relationship to nutrient intake. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:667–76. [PubMed]
18. Medical Research Council. Controlled trial of soya-bean oil in myocardial infarction: report of a research committee to the Medical Research Council. Lancet 1968;292:693–700.
19. Dayton S, Pearce ML, Hashomoto S, Dixon WJ, Tomiyasu U. A controlled clinical trial of a diet high in unsaturated fat in preventing complications of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1969;40:(1S2):II-1– II-63.
20. Leren P. The Oslo Diet-Heart Study. Circulation 1970;42:935–42. [PubMed]
21. Turpeinen O, Karvonen MJ, Pekkarinen M, Miettinen M, Elosuo R, Paavilainen E Dietary prevention of coronary heart disease: the Finnish Mental Hospital Study. Int J Epidemiol 1979;8:99–118. [PubMed]
22. Miettinen M, Turpeinen O, Karvonen MJ, Pekkarinen M, Paavilainen E, Elosuo R Dietary prevention of coronary heart disease in women: the Finnish mental hospital study. Int J Epidemiol 1983;12:17–25. [PubMed]
23. Woodhill JM, Palmer AJ, Leelarthaepin B, McGilchrist C, Blacket RB Low fat, low cholesterol diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 1978;109:317–30. [PubMed]
24. Ramsden CE, Zamora D, Leelarthaepin B, Majchrzak-Hong SF, Faurot KR, Suchindran CM, Ringel A, Davis JM, Hibbeln JR Use of dietary linoleic acid for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and death: evaluation of recovered data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study and updated meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;346:e8707. [PubMed]
25. Rose GA, Thomson WB, Williams RT Corn oil in treatment of ischaemic heart disease. BMJ 1965;1:1531–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville (MD): Health United States; 1995. DHHS Publication no. (PHS) 96–1232.
27. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary guidelines for Americans. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000;
28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary guidelines for Americans. 6th ed Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office; 2005;
29. USDA; US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2010. 7th ed Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Britten P, Cleveland LE, Koegel KL, Kuczynski KJ, Nickols-Richardson SM Updated US Department of Agriculture Food Patterns meet goals of the 2010 dietary guidelines. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:1648–55. [PubMed]
31. Siri-Tarino PW, Chiu S, Bergeron N, Krauss RM Saturated fats versus polyunsaturated fats versus carbohydrates for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Annu Rev Nutr 2015;35:517–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Hite AH, Feinman RD, Guzman GE, Satin M, Schoenfeld PA, Wood RJ In the face of contradictory evidence: report of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans Committee. Nutrition 2010;26:915–24. [PubMed]
33. Dwyer JT. Past is prologue: 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee scientific report. Nutr Today 2015;50:163–8.
34. Micha R, King IB, Lemaitre RN, Rimm EB, Sacks F, Song X, Siscovick DS, Mozaffarian D Food sources of individual plasma phospholipid trans fatty acid isomers: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:883–93. [PubMed]
35. Forouhi NG, Koulman A, Sharp SJ, Imamura F, Kröger J, Schulze MB, Crowe FL, Huerta JM, Guevara M, Beulens JW, et al. Differences in the prospective association between individual plasma phospholipid saturated fatty acids and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:810–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Huth PJ, Park KM Influence of dairy product and milk fat consumption on cardiovascular disease risk: a review of the evidence. Adv Nutr 2012;3:266–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Elwood PC, Pickering JE, Givens DI, Gallacher JE The consumption of milk and dairy foods and the incidence of vascular disease and diabetes: an overview of the evidence. Lipids 2010;45:925–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Soedamah-Muthu SS, Ding EL, Al-Delaimy WK, Hu FB, Engberink MF, Willett WC, Geleijnse JM Milk and dairy consumption and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:158–71. [PubMed]
39. Goldbohm RA, Chorus AM, Galindo Garre F, Schouten LJ, van den Brandt PA Dairy consumption and 10-y total and cardiovascular mortality: a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:615–27. [PubMed]
40. Benatar JR, Sidhu K, Stewart RA Effects of high and low fat dairy food on cardio-metabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. PLoS One 2013;8:e76480. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Aune D, Norat T, Romundstad P, Vatten LJ Dairy products and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:1066–83. [PubMed]
42. Chen M, Sun Q, Giovannucci E, Mozaffarian D, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB Dairy consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. BMC Med 2014;12:215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Yakoob MY, Shi P, Willett WC, Rexrode KM, Campos H, Orav EJ, Hu FB, Mozaffarian D Circulating biomarkers of dairy fat and risk of incident diabetes mellitus among men and women in the United States in two large prospective cohorts. Circulation 2016;133:1645–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH, Willett WC Dietary saturated fats and their food sources in relation to the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:1001–8. [PubMed]
45. Ness AR, Smith GD, Hart C Milk, coronary heart disease and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:379–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Gao D, Ning N, Wang C, Wang Y, Li Q, Meng Z, Liu Y, Li Q Dairy products consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e73965. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Louie JC, Flood VM, Hector DJ, Rangan AM, Gill TP Dairy consumption and overweight and obesity: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev 2011;12:e582–92. [PubMed]
48. de Oliveira Otto MC, Mozaffarian D, Kromhout D, Bertoni AG, Sibley CT, Jacobs DR, Nettleton JA Dietary intake of saturated fat by food source and incident cardiovascular disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:397–404. [PubMed]
49. Tinker LF, Bonds DE, Margolis KL Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of treated diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1500–11. [PubMed]
50. Tong X, Dong JY, Wu ZW, Li W, Qin LQ Dairy consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:1027–31. [PubMed]
51. Sun Q, Ma J, Campos H, Hankinson SE, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rexrode KM, Willett WC, Hu FB A prospective study of trans fatty acids in erythrocytes and risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007;115:1858–65. [PubMed]
52. Mozaffarian D, Pischon T, Hankinson SE, Rifai N, Joshipura K, Willett WC, Rimm EB Dietary intake of trans fatty acids and systemic inflammation in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:606–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Lopez-Garcia E, Schulze MB, Meigs JB, Manson JE, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB Consumption of trans fatty acids is related to plasma biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. J Nutr 2005;135:562–6. [PubMed]
54. Salisbury AC, Chan PS, Gosch KL, Buchanan DM, Spertus JA Patterns and predictors of fast food consumption after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:1105–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Kremmyda LS, Tvrzicka E, Stankova B, Zak A Fatty acids as biocompounds: their role in human metabolism, health and disease: a review. Part 2: fatty acid physiological roles and applications in human health and disease. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2011;155:195–218. [PubMed]
56. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation 2016;133:187–225. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Gatellier P, Sante-Lhoutellier V, Portanguen S, Kondjoyan A Use of meat fluorescence emission as a marker of oxidation promoted by cooking. Meat Sci 2009;83:651–6. [PubMed]
58. Brown ED, Morris VC, Rhodes DG, Sinha R, Levander OA Urinary malondialdehyde-equivalents during ingestion of meat cooked at high or low temperatures. Lipids 1995;30:1053–6. [PubMed]
59. Chowdhury R, Warnakula S, Kunutsor S, Crowe F, Ward HA, Johnson L, Franco OH, Butterworth AS, Forouhi NG, Thompson SG, et al. Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:398–406. [PubMed]
60. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, Covas MI, Corella D, Arós F, Gómez-Gracia E, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Fiol M, Lapetra J, et al. ; PREDIMED Study Investigators Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med 2013;368(14):1279–90. [PubMed]
61. Jakobsen MU, O’Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA, Bälter K, Fraser GE, Goldbourt U, Hallmans G, Knekt P, Liu S, et al. Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1425–32. [PubMed]
62. Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Kabagambe EK, Baylin A, Ascherio A, Campos H The type of oil used for cooking is associated with the risk of nonfatal acute myocardial infarction in Costa Rica. J Nutr 2005;135:2674–9. [PubMed]
64. Schwab U, Uusitupa M Diet heart controversies—quality of fat matters. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2015;25:617–22. [PubMed]
65. Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester AD, Katan MB Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1146–55. [PubMed]
66. Lawrence GD. Dietary fats and health: dietary recommendations in the context of scientific evidence. Adv Nutr 2013;4:294–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2392–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Nutrition Evidence Library. A series of systematic reviews on the relationship between 1699 dietary patterns and health outcomes [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1700 Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; 2014 [cited 2015 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.nel.gov/vault/2440/web/files/DietaryPatterns/DPRptFullFinal.pdf.
69. Smitasiri S, Uauy R Beyond recommendations: implementing food-based dietary guidelines for healthier populations. Food Nutr Bull 2007;28 Suppl International:S141–51. [PubMed]
70. Al-Solaiman Y, Jesri A, Mountford WK, Lackland DT, Zhao Y, Egan BM DASH lowers blood pressure in obese hypertensives beyond potassium, magnesium and fibre. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:237–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, Hu FB, Hubbard VS, Jakicic JM, Kushner RF, et al. AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation 2014;129:S102–38. [PubMed]
72. Huang RY, Huang CC, Hu FB, Chavarro JE Vegetarian diets and weight reduction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:109–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Leventakou V, Sarri K, Georgiou V, Chatzea V, Frouzi E, Kastelianou A, Gatzou A, Kogevinas M, Chatzi L Early life determinants of dietary patterns in preschool children: Rhea mother-child cohort, Crete, Greece. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016;70:60–5. [PubMed]
74. Smith AD, Emmett PM, Newby PK, Northstone K Dietary patterns obtained through principal components analysis: the effect of input variable quantification. Br J Nutr 2013;109:1881–91. [PubMed]
75. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol 2002;13:3–9. [PubMed]
76. Guenther PM, Casavale KO, Reedy J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hiza HA, Kuczynski KJ, Kahle LL, Krebs-Smith SM Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:569–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Montagnese C, Santarpia L, Buonifacio M, Nardelli A, Caldara AR, Silvestri E, Contaldo F, Pasanisi F European food-based dietary guidelines: a comparison and update. Nutrition 2015;31:908–15. [PubMed]
78. Kerver JM, Yang EJ, Bianchi L, Song WO Dietary patterns associated with risk factors for cardiovascular disease in healthy US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:1103–10. [PubMed]
79. Eurodiet, 2000. Eurodiet core report: Nutrition and diet for healthy lifestyles in Europe. Science and policy implications. Heraklion (Greece): School of Medicine, University of Crete.
80. Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, Mozaffarian D; Global Burden of Diseases Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3:e132–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Altamirano Martínez MB, Cordero Muñoz AY, Macedo Ojeda G, Márquez Sandoval YF, Vizmanos B A Review of graphical representations used in the dietary guidelines of selected countries in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Nutr Hosp 2015;32:986–96. [PubMed]
82. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [Internet]. Choose Myplate.gov Dietary Guidelines [Internet] 2012 [cited 2015 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/dietary-guidelines.html.
83. Harvard School of Public Health. “The Nutrition Source” [Internet]. Food pyramids and plates: what should you really eat? 2012 [cited 2015 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/what-shouldyou-eat/pyramid-full-story/index.html.

Articles from Advances in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition