PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
From:
J Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 January; 29(1): 79–94.
Published online 2016 August 30. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01022

Table 1

Means of performance measures for each condition in both experiments. Main effects of lexicality, word frequency, and imageability were all significant at p < 0.001, as described in the Results section. The interaction of word frequency and imageability was also significant at p < 0.001 by all three performance measures in both experiments. The sole exception was the lexicality effect for Experiment 1 as measured by IES, which was significant at p < 0.01. RT = response time, ms = milliseconds.

Experiment 1, RT (ms)Experiment 2, RT (ms)
Word FrequencyWord Frequency
HighLowMeanHighLowMean
Image-abilityHigh695.7754.0724.8Image-abilityHigh1210.01342.51276.3
Low727.8859.2793.5Low1231.71444.11337.9
Mean711.8806.6Mean1220.91393.3
Overall mean for words748.5Overall mean for words1287.2
Experiment 1, Accuracy (%)Experiment 2, Accuracy (%)
Word FrequencyWord Frequency
HighLowMeanHighLowMean
Image-abilityHigh96.391.593.9Image-abilityHigh93.782.488.1
Low91.464.678.0Low89.044.666.8
Mean93.878.0Mean91.463.5
Overall mean for words85.9Overall mean for words77.4
Experiment 1, Inverse Efficiency ScoreExperiment 2, Inverse Efficiency Score
Word FrequencyWord Frequency
HighLowMeanHighLowMean
Image-abilityHigh724.0834.4779.2Image-abilityHigh1301.91810.41556.1
Low828.32116.01472.1Low1520.65302.73361.9
Mean776.21475.2Mean1411.23510.6
Overall mean for words1125.7Overall mean for words2447.3
Experiment 1, PseudowordsExperiment 2, Pseudowords
Mean RT (ms)811.0Mean RT (ms)1350.2
Mean Accuracy (%)94.4Mean Accuracy (%)91.4
Mean Inverse Efficiency Score872.0Mean Inverse Efficiency Score1506.1