Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5183498

Low awareness and use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a diverse online sample of men who have sex with men in New York City

Sanchit Gupta, MD, MS, Internal Medicine resident, David Lounsbury, PhD, Assistant Professor of Epidemiology, and Viraj V. Patel, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine*

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitibine-tenofovir has been shown to be highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition by individuals at high risk, especially men who have sex with men (MSM; Grant et al., 2010; McCormack et al., 2016; Molina et al., 2015). Research exploring knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and use of PrEP is in a formative stage and evolving. Prior studies have found MSM to be interested in using PrEP, with greater awareness and use associated with older age and higher education. (Bauermeister, Meanley, Pingel, Soler, & Harper, 2013; Mimiaga, Case, Johnson, Safren, & Mayer, 2009). At the same time, MSM report concerns about insurance coverage, medication dosages, and possible side effects (Golub, Gamarel, Rendina, Surace, & Lelutiu-Weinberger, 2013; Krakower et al., 2012; Mustanski, Johnson, Garofalo, Ryan, & Birkett, 2013).

Young MSM (YMSM) between the ages of 18 and 29 are at highest risk of HIV infection and, therefore, may stand to benefit most from PrEP use (Halkitis et al., 2011). MSM in New York City, and particularly Black and Latino YMSM, continue to experience high rates of new HIV infections and are a group for whom PrEP may be helpful in addition to other prevention interventions (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010; Chu et al., 2011; Pathela et al., 2011). However, limited information exists regarding PrEP awareness and use in New York City MSM, especially those who are young and of racial and ethnic minority. The few available studies reported low levels of PrEP awareness or use but were conducted prior to FDA approval of emtricitibine-tenofovir for PrEP (Golub et al., 2013; Mehta et al., 2011; Rucinski et al., 2013). Studies conducted post-FDA approval that found increasing rates of awareness, but low overall use, had samples comprised largely of older, White, and more educated individuals. We therefore conducted a brief online survey to explore PrEP awareness and use among MSM in New York City, with a focus on Black and Latino YMSM, groups most at risk for HIV.


Setting and Participants

We recruited MSM who used a popular MSM-specific geosocial-networking smartphone application in the Bronx, New York. The Bronx is comprised of more than 90% racial and ethnic minorities (primarily Black and Latino), is the poorest borough in New York City, and has an HIV prevalence of 1.8% to more than 3% (HIV Epidemiology and Field Services Program, 2015). Because we were recruiting on an MSM specific application, our only inclusion criteria were being at least 16 years of age, having had anal sex in the previous year, and consenting to participate.

Recruitment and Participants

We used similar methods to those described by others to recruit participants (Goedel, Halkitis, Greene, Hickson, & Duncan, 2016; Rendina, Jimenez, Grov, Ventuneac, & Parsons, 2014). During a 48-hour period in September 2013, we used broadcast and banner advertisements, displayed to users when opening the application in the Bronx, NY. Participants could then click through to a Web-based survey. The initial survey page had screening questions and detailed information about the study, followed by an informed consent or assent (for those younger than 18). The survey was anonymous and, to help avoid duplicate or false responses, we did not provide any incentives and limited responses to one per IP address (Zhang, Bi, Hiller, & Lv, 2008). The Albert Einstein College of Medicine’s Institutional Review Board approved the study.


Items on the survey included self-reported demographics, HIV testing history, future HIV testing intentions, condom use at last sexual intercourse, PrEP awareness (Before today, had you heard about PrEP – i.e., pre-exposure prophylaxis, medicine taken by mouth BEFORE sex as protection against HIV?), and history of PrEP use (Have you ever taken PrEP before?). The brief survey had 13 items and took on average 3 minutes to complete.


The primary outcome of interest was PrEP awareness. We conducted bivariate analysis using logistic regression to determine associations between PrEP awareness and demographics, HIV testing history, and condom use. We then conducted multivariate logistic regression to identify correlates of PrEP awareness, using a backward-stepwise elimination approach and included race/ethnicity in the models as this was a primary independent variable of interest. Given the low number of PrEP users, we provide descriptive characteristics of those individuals. We used Stata 13.1 (College Station, TX) for all analyses.


Sample Characteristics

The survey was accessed by 809 individuals, of whom 302 provided informed consent and 270 completed the survey (33.3% completion rate). The majority of participants (67%) identified their race or ethnicity as non-White, the median age was 30 years, with about half the participants (n = 126, 48%) being between the ages of 18 and 29 (Table 1). Most participants identified as male, with one person identifying as gender-queer and another as transgender.

Table 1
Participant Characteristics

Sexual and HIV Testing Behaviors

The majority of participants (87%) reported men as their only sexual partners within the past 2 years and only 57% reported using condoms at the last sexual encounter (Table 1). Most respondents (n = 245, 91%) reported ever being tested for HIV with the majority (52%) being tested within the past 6 months, and almost two-thirds (62%) received their last test at a medical clinic or hospital (Table 1).

Awareness of PrEP

Overall, 34% of respondents (n = 93) indicated awareness of PrEP. Of those participants who were aware of PrEP, 92% (86/93) had ever had an HIV test and 56% (52/93) had received an HIV test within the past 6 months. By race/ethnicity, 40% of non-Hispanic Whites, 28% of non-Hispanic Blacks, and 28% of Hispanics were aware of PrEP (p = 0.26). Among YMSM (under 30 years of age), 27.5% (n = 33) were aware of PrEP versus 40% (n = 60) of those ages 30 and older (p = 0.017)

In bivariate analysis, PrEP awareness was significantly associated with older age and receiving the last HIV test at community-based organizations (CBOs; Table 2). There was a nonsignificant trend in Blacks (p = 0.14) and Hispanics (p = 0.058) being less aware of PrEP than Whites. No other measured characteristic correlated with PrEP awareness. In multivariate analysis, older age and HIV testing location remained associated with greater PrEP awareness, but race/ethnicity did not (Table 2).

Table 2
Correlates of PrEP Awareness

Use of PrEP

Only 6 respondents reported having ever used PrEP. This represented 2% of the overall sample and 6% of those aware of PrEP. Users had a median age of 30 and ranged from 25 to 48 years. Two PrEP users identified as non-Hispanic White, two as Hispanic, one as non-Hispanic Black, and one as Asian. All identified as male, only one participant reported having non-male partners, and the majority of PrEP users (n = 4) reported using a condom at last sexual intercourse.


We accessed an ethnically/racially diverse sample of MSM using a geo-social mobile networking application in a high HIV-prevalence area of New York City. The majority of our respondents were unaware of PrEP and only six reported ever using PrEP. While PrEP awareness was independently associated with older age and the location of last HIV test, we did not observe differences by race or ethnicity, condom use at last sexual encounter, or other measured characteristics.

Compared to other studies reporting on PrEP awareness in New York City MSM, which recruited using different approaches (in-person, bars, bathhouses, or via MSM specific Internet websites) and conducted prior to (Mantell et al., 2014; Rucinski et al., 2013) or after FDA approval of PrEP (Grov, Rendina, Whitfield, Ventuneac, & Parsons, 2016), rates of PrEP awareness were similar to that in our sample, ranging from 28% to 38.8%. Our findings may not be that surprising, given that this study was conducted just over 1 year after FDA approval of PrEP and the average time for new health care innovations to become widely known and adopted can be considerably long, as a more recent study of PrEP use in Black MSM found continued minimal awareness and thus stalled uptake (Eaton, Driffin, Bauermeister, Smith, & Conway-Washington, 2015). However, more recent studies in New York City MSM have found increasing rates of PrEP awareness, ranging from 65.5%–85.5% (Goedel, Halkitis, Greene, & Duncan, 2016; Strauss et al., 2016), suggesting influence of the ongoing intensive PrEP awareness campaigns by the city and state departments of health (Bellafante, 2015; New York State Department of Health, 2015) as well as numerous CBOs. These types of multi-pronged campaigns may be what is needed to help increase PrEP knowledge, a prerequisite for adoption in populations at risk of HIV.

We found that PrEP awareness was associated with HIV testing at CBOs rather than in clinical settings, which has not been previously reported. Our findings may be indicative of CBOs as important venues for both HIV testing and dissemination of HIV prevention information for MSM and, therefore, important targets for PrEP uptake interventions. Additionally, CBOs have been recruitment sites for many PrEP studies in New York City, and individuals testing at CBOs may thus have had more exposure to PrEP information. Our findings also suggest that health care providers are not universally having conversations about PrEP with MSM patients. This may be due to low provider PrEP knowledge (Smith, Mendoza, Stryker, & Rose, 2016; Tripathi, Ogbuanu, Monger, Gibson, & Duffus, 2012; White, Mimiaga, Krakower, & Mayer, 2012), lack of comfort prescribing PrEP (Krakower & Mayer, 2012), or concerns about risk compensation, resistance development, or adherence (Tellalian, Maznavi, Bredeek, & Hardy, 2013). Providers may also be unaware of their patients’ sexual practices due to discomfort with sexual-health assessments or patients’ discomfort disclosing same-sex behaviors (Bernstein et al., 2008), resulting in missed opportunities for appropriate health evaluations including counseling on PrEP. But regardless of the exact causes, our findings suggest a role for health care providers to counsel about PrEP, including conducting non-judgmental sexual health assessments.

Consistent with other studies of PrEP awareness (Bauermeister et al., 2013; Eaton et al., 2015; Strauss et al., 2016), older age in our sample was associated with greater PrEP awareness, which could be attributed to a number of factors including potentially higher education levels, having increased concerns about health, and/or increased access to health care and current health information. This finding highlighted the uneven dissemination of HIV prevention information, especially to younger MSM and addressing this gap will be critical to prevent further exacerbation of HIV disparities by age. Social media and geo-social networking applications are likely efficient dissemination tools for health information to younger and racial/ethnic minority MSM and warrant further exploration (Patel, Masyukova, Sutton, & Horvath, 2016).

There are several important limitations in this study. First, we used a convenience sample from a single mobile dating application, which may not be representative of all MSM in the Bronx, and findings may not be generalizable to other MSM communities. However, we found similar rates of PrEP awareness in other studies in New York City using different recruitment approaches (Grov et al., 2016; Mantell et al., 2014; Rucinski et al., 2013). Additionally, a prior in-person survey of Bronx MSM found widespread use of social media, with individuals using online dating applications having higher rates of risk behaviors (Patel et al., 2016), suggesting we reached a population that could benefit from PrEP. Second, our survey was designed to be extremely brief to increase participation rates; we were thus unable to capture additional covariates of interest. Finally, we used self-reported measures, which could result in misclassification, but because responses were anonymous, answers may have had higher accuracy.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated low PrEP awareness and use in a diverse online sample of MSM, with uneven dissemination to YMSM and likely missed opportunities for PrEP education and counseling in clinical settings. Ongoing efforts need to better understand and address the gap between PrEP awareness and use. Finally, for PrEP to have a meaningful impact in the control of the HIV epidemic and in reducing disparities, we need more effective interventions to support PrEP uptake in groups at high risk of HIV infection, especially YMSM.


We would like to thank the participants who volunteered for this study and feedback from Division of General Internal Medicine’s HIV affinity group on earlier versions of this manuscript. This study was supported in part by NIH grants K23MH102118, R25DA023021, UL1 TR001073, and the Center for AIDS Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center (NIH AI-51519). The funding source had no role in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


The authors report no real or perceived vested interests that relate to this article that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Sanchit Gupta, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA.

David Lounsbury, Division of Community Collaboration & Implementation Science, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

Viraj V. Patel, Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Health System/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA (gro.eroifetnom@letapv)


  • Bauermeister JA, Meanley S, Pingel E, Soler JH, Harper GW. PrEP awareness and perceived barriers among single young men who have sex with men. Current HIV Research. 2013;11(7):520–527. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bellafante G. New York revamps safe sex. New York Times. 2015 Dec 18; Retrieved from
  • Bernstein KT, Liu K-L, Begier EM, Koblin B, Karpati A, Murrill C. Same-sex attraction disclosure to health care providers among New York City men who have sex with men. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168(13):1458–1464. [PubMed]
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men — 21 cities, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2010;59(37):1201–1207. [PubMed]
  • Chu C, Umanski G, Blank A, Meissner P, Grossberg R, Selwyn PA. Comorbidity-related treatment outcomes among HIV-infected adults in the Bronx, NY. Journal of Urban Health. 2011;88(3):507–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Bauermeister J, Smith H, Conway-Washington C. Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among at risk, hiv-negative, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2015;29(8):423–429. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goedel WC, Halkitis PN, Greene RE, Duncan DT. Correlates of awareness of and willingness to use Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in New York City. AIDS and Behavior. 2016;20(7):1–8. [PubMed]
  • Goedel WC, Halkitis PN, Greene RE, Hickson DA, Duncan DT. HIV risk behaviors, perceptions, and testing and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness/use in grindr-using men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2016;27(2):133–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Golub SA, Gamarel KE, Rendina HJ, Surace A, Lelutiu-Weinberger CL. From efficacy to effectiveness: Facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2013;27(4):248–254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Glidden DV. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(27):2587–2599. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grov C, Rendina HJ, Whitfield THF, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Changes in familiarity with and willingness to take preexposure prophylaxis in a longitudinal study of highly sexually active gay and bisexual men. LGBT Health. 2016;3(4):252–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Halkitis PN, Brockwell S, Siconolfi DE, Moeller RW, Sussman RD, Mourgues PJ, Sweeney MM. Sexual behaviors of adolescent emerging and young adult men who have sex with men ages 13–29 in New York City. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2011;56(3):285–291. [PubMed]
  • HIV Epidemiology and Field Services Program. HIV Surveillance Annual Report, 2014. New York, NY: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2015. Dec,
  • Krakower D, Mayer KH. Engaging healthcare providers to implement HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2012;7(6):593–599. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Krakower DS, Mimiaga MJ, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Mitty JA, White JM, Mayer KH. Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an Internet social networking site. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e33119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mantell JE, Sandfort TGM, Hoffman S, Guidry JA, Masvawure TB, Cahill S. Knowledge and attitudes about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) participating in New York City gay pride events. LGBT Health. 2014;1(2):93–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, Gill ON. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): Effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mehta SA, Silvera R, Bernstein K, Holzman RS, Aberg JA, Daskalakis DC. Awareness of post-exposure HIV prophylaxis in high-risk men who have sex with men in New York City. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2011;87(4):344–348. [PubMed]
  • Mimiaga MJ, Case P, Johnson CV, Safren SA, Mayer KH. Preexposure antiretroviral prophylaxis attitudes in high-risk Boston area men who report having sex with men: Limited knowledge and experience but potential for increased utilization after education. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2009;50(1):77–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Molina J-M, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, Delfraissy J-F. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(23):2237–2246. [PubMed]
  • Mustanski B, Johnson AK, Garofalo R, Ryan D, Birkett M. Perceived likelihood of using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis medications among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior. 2013;17(6):2173–2179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • New York State Department of Health. PrEP for sex. 2015 Retrieved March 8, 2016, from
  • Patel VV, Masyukova M, Sutton D, Horvath KJ. Social media use and HIV-related risk behaviors in young Black and Latino Gay and bi men and transgender individuals in New York City: Implications for online interventions. Journal of Urban Health. 2016;93(2):388–399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Schillinger JA, Shepard C, Sweeney M, Blank S. Men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV and syphilis compared with heterosexual men in New York City. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2011;58(4):408–416. [PubMed]
  • Rendina HJ, Jimenez RH, Grov C, Ventuneac A, Parsons JT. Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr. AIDS and Behavior. 2014;18(1):41–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rucinski KB, Mensah NP, Sepkowitz KA, Cutler BH, Sweeney MM, Myers JE. Knowledge and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis among an online sample of young men who have sex with men in New York City. AIDS and Behavior. 2013;17(6):2180–2184. [PubMed]
  • Smith DK, Mendoza MCB, Stryker JE, Rose CE. PrEP awareness and attitudes in a national survey of primary care clinicians in the United States, 2009–2015. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0156592. Retrieved from [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Strauss BB, Greene GJ, Phillips G, Bhatia R, Madkins K, Parsons JT, Mustanski B. Exploring patterns of awareness and use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior. 2016 [PubMed]
  • Tellalian D, Maznavi K, Bredeek UF, Hardy WD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV infection: Results of a survey of HIV healthcare providers evaluating their knowledge, attitudes, and prescribing practices. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2013;27(10):553–559. [PubMed]
  • Tripathi A, Ogbuanu C, Monger M, Gibson JJ, Duffus Wa. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: Healthcare providers’ knowledge, perception, and willingness to adopt future implementation in the southern US. Southern Medical Journal. 2012;105(4):199–206. [PubMed]
  • White JM, Mimiaga MJ, Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Evolution of Massachusetts physician attitudes, knowledge, and experience regarding the use of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2012;26(7):395–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhang D, Bi P, Hiller JE, Lv F. Web-based HIV/AIDS behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: Potential and challenges. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;12(2):126–131. [PubMed]