PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of neurogenNeurogenesis
 
Neurogenesis (Austin). 2016; 3(1): e1230167.
Published online 2016 September 22. doi:  10.1080/23262133.2016.1230167
PMCID: PMC5063060

Could folic acid influence growth cone motility during the development of neural connectivity?

ABSTRACT

Perinatal dietary supplementation, together with widespread fortification of grain-based foods with synthetic folic acid (FA) has resulted in rising concentrations of unmetabolized plasma FA in pregnant women. In a recently published study we reported on experiments in which we cultured dorsal root ganglia from chick embryos in a range of FA concentrations. We found that FA inhibited neurite extension, synaptogenesis, and growth cone motility. In this commentary we consider the possible mechanism further. The effect of FA is more likely to be on motility processes of growth cones with their exploratory filapodia than on neurotrophic stimulation. Receptors present in the filapodia membrane recognize and bind to environmental guidance cues. The presence of the NMDA receptor on filapodia, and the possible competition of FA with the neurotransmitter glutamate for binding to it, resulting in perturbation of growth cone guidance, are discussed. Whether excess FA exerts its inhibitory effects by such binding competition or via some other mechanism, further investigation is needed. Sufficient intake of folate from conception through the first month of human pregnancy is essential for neural tube closure. However, our results suggest that an upper limit for FA consumption after the first month should be considered.

KEYWORDS: chick embryo, dorsal root ganglia, folic acid, growth cone, neurogenesis

Perinatal dietary supplementation, together with widespread fortification of grain-based foods with synthetic folic acid (FA) has resulted in a demographic with rising concentrations of unmetabolized plasma FA. The supplementation has decreased the incidence of neural tube defects in newborns,1-5 however, there is concern that overconsumption may have adverse consequences. Evidence has begun to appear that it may affect CNS development and the risk for autism spectrum disorder.6-9 Furthermore, some published studies have provided evidence that it does.10-12 Yet the means by which excess FA could affect neural development has been lacking. Our recent study Influence of Folic Acid on Neural Connectivity During Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurogenesis published in Cells Tissues Organs13 has provided some experimental evidence at the cellular behavior level for a mechanism by which excess FA may alter neurogenesis.

We cultured dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) taken from 8-day old chick embryos in a range of synthetic FA (pteroylmonoglutamate) concentrations. The DRGs were cultured 36 hours, then fixed and immunostained to reveal the presence of neural networks with synaptic vesicles, and then analyzed for motile behavior. We found a dose-dependent relationship with a significant reduction in the length of outgrowing neurites cultured in FA concentrations from 0.25 −20μM. The average total of stained synaptic areas surrounding each cultured DRG was significantly reduced as well. To further characterize the effects, we carried out time-lapse imaging of growth cones at terminals of extending neurites. We found that FA reduced the area-changing activity of growth cones, hindering their exploratory capabilities, along with showing a tendency to inhibit overall advancement, thus perturbing the ability to extend and form synapses. Our results showed that FA, at concentrations of 250 nM and higher reduces neurite extension and synapse formation in a dose-dependent manner during neurogenesis, and that its effect is likely mediated through inhibition of growth cone motility.13 Although chick embryo DRG neurons are not human brain cortical neurons, they do form thin, straight neural processes (neurites) that elongate, led by exploratory growth cones. They do establish contact with other neurons to form neural networks. They also accumulate synaptic vesicles that will release neurotransmitters to achieve communication. These are the fundamental behaviors of all developing neurons.

Neurites lengthen with time as actin-myosin-based motility in growth cones provides a leading tractional force and microtubules and neurofilaments then assemble in the trunk of the neurite to engorge the growth cone and grow longer. This, together with our evidence that growth cone motility was depressed, suggests that the effect of FA is likely to be more directly on motility processes than on neurotrophic stimulation. Less active growth cones in the presence of high FA would predict the development of less frequent and less extensive neural networks. Growth cones are responsible for detection of favorable substrates and targets for directional guidance of innervation. If their activity is depressed, fewer contacts will be made. Similarly, differentiation to form synaptic vesicles will follow growth cone motility, becoming established where viable contacts have been made and synaptogenesis would be expected to commence. We found evidence that high FA impeded both number and extent of synaptogenic areas based on immunolocalization with a monoclonal antibody. We found support for this effect of FA on growth cones from directly analyzing motility activity using time-lapse movies. FA added to the culture environment at 2.4 µM caused a 22% reduction of growth cone area changing activity (from 19 µm2 per minute to 15 µm2 per minute).13 Clearly, the growth cone's complex infrastructure of actin with associated motility proteins was strongly affected by the presence of the added FA. But in what way was it affected?

Growth cones can extend, pause, turn or retract as they navigate toward or away from a target. Their motility and guidance are achieved through dynamic assembly and remodeling of the actin microfilament and microtubule cytoskeleton that occupies them (for recent reviews see refs. 14-17). The growth cone contains a central domain occupied by stable, bundled microtubules entering from the neurite shaft, along with vesicles, organelles, and also central actin bundles. Surrounding this is a narrow transition zone where contractile actomyosin bundles form arcs perpendicular to the direction of extension and where actin filament severing for depolymerization and recycling occurs. Finally, there a peripheral domain that is filled with a fine cross-linked actin network that forms a dynamic lamellipodium, but also contains long, tight bundles of actin that extend from the transition zone outward into finger-like filapodia, supporting them and mediating their behavior. The filapodia are sensory, exploratory, and adhesive. Some microtubules, likely involved in space-filling as guidance sensors16 extend from the central domain into the filapodia to interact with adhesion sites. Filapodia are key to directional motility, and to eventual innervation.

Receptors present in the filapodia membrane (or in membrane of the more proximal areas in the peripheral domain) recognize and bind to guidance cues present in the neurogenic environment. These may be fixed cell adhesion molecules present on other cells that are in contact with the growth cone, or they may be in the extracellular matrix environment (laminin or fibronectin, for example). In addition, there are also diffusible chemotropic molecules including neurotrophic factors, morphogens, and neurotransmitters. Binding of ligands to the receptors promotes the formation of adhesion complexes to engage the actin cytoskeleton for traction, and it initiates signaling cascades that continuously remodel the actin through polymerization, contraction, and disassembly. This involves guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), which in turn activate the Rho GTPases RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 locally. These then integrate and coordinate cytoskeletal effectors that control actin's behavior (see review in ref. 16).

With regard to the inhibitory effects of FA on growth cones that we reported,13 the role of neurotransmitters and their receptors is potentially relevant. The chemical structure of FA contains the exact structure of glutamate at one end. Perhaps it could compete with glutamate for binding to a receptor. In particular, glutamate is eventually the most common excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, and one of its receptors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor has been implicated in synapse formation during cerebral cortex development.17 Its presence in a developmentally regulated manner in presynaptiC-terminals has now been established in vitro and in vivo in experiments using rat neurons.18 NMDA receptors have also been linked to developmental disorders, including epilepsy19 and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.20 When NMDA receptors in functioning synapses are activated by glutamate binding and simultaneously by glycine binding and depolarization, they open channels allowing fluxes of Na+, K+ and Ca2+. Ca2+ influx is significant because it induces multiple calcium-dependent signaling networks that can alter gene expression, alter other receptors present in the postsynaptic membrane such as the AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) receptor (which also binds glutamate), and alter the local actin cytoskeleton (see review in ref. 21). Ca2+ influx into developing neurons via the NMDA receptor is a key regulator of neurite extension, synaptogenesis, and the maturation of synapses (reviewed in ref. 22). At a later time, such potent effects function to regulate synaptic plasticity in learning and memory, part of an activity-dependent neuronal signaling scheme.21 Ca2+ influx into growth cones could certainly modulate the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, and therefore their “steering” as directional advance carries on. It follows that anything that could compete with glutamate's binding to the NMDA receptor, such as excess FA during development, would interfere with the process. It is of interest to note that the amino acid homocysteine also binds this receptor, and at elevated levels has teratogenic effects during development (reviewed in ref. 23).

Does FA in fact compete with glutamate for binding to the NMDA receptor? There is evidence that it can. In a voltage-clamp study of retina horizontal cell electrical current responses to glutamate binding, O'Dell et al.24 found that FA was an effective competitor (along with several amino acids) of glutamate, blocking 40% of the response. Rowe and Ruddock25 also showed that FA competes with glutamate to hyperpolarize retina horizontal cells of fish eyes. Our report that augmenting the glutamate concentration to 5 μM in our dorsal root ganglia cultures could overcome the inhibition of neurite extension caused by 5 μM FA13 is consistent with this.

Whether excess FA exerts its inhibitory effects by competing with glutamate for binding or via some other mechanism, the phenomenon should be investigated further. As we noted in our study13 the FA concentration of fasting level plasma in adults is normally 4–45 nM (3–15 ng/mL), and in children it is 11–48 nM.26 Adult red blood cells contain quite concentrated folate that varies widely from 317–1422 nM.26 The concentrations of FA used in our experiment were 0.25–20 µM, and we did observe significant inhibition of neurite length at the lowest concentration, 250 nM. This is only 5–50 fold higher than in adult plasma after fasting. FA supplementation of grain-based foods and the oral supplements taken before and throughout pregnancy are elevating many women to high and continuous levels of FA consumption during the long period of embryonic and fetal brain development. Sufficient intake of folate from conception through the first month of human pregnancy is essential to make sure neural tube development will be normal, however, our results suggest that an upper limit on FA consumption after the first month should be considered. The outcomes of low, normal and high levels are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
Scheme illustrating possible mechanisms and consequences of levels of FA that are normal, too low or too high during brain development.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

[1] Smithells RW, Sheppard S, Schorah CJ, Seller MJ, Nevin NC, Harris R, Read AP, Fielding DW. Possible prevention of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. Lancet 1980; 1:339-340; PMID:6101792; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(80)90886-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[2] Smithells RW, Nevin NC, Seller MJ, Sheppard S, Harris R, Read AP, Fielding DW, Walker S, Schorah CJ, Wild J. Further experience of vitamin supplementation for prevention of neural tube defect recurrences. Lancet 1983; 1:1027-1031; PMID:6133069; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92654-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[3] Mulinare J, Cordero JF, Erickson JD, Berry RJ. Periconceptional use of multivitamins and the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA 1988; 260(21):3141-3145; PMID:3184392; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410210053035 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[4] Milunsky A, Jick H, Jick SS, Bruell CL, MacLaughlin DS, Rothman KJ, Willett W. Multivitamin/folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the prevalence of neural tube defects. JAMA 1989; 262(20):2847-2852; PMID:2478730; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430200091032 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[5] Wald D, Bishop L, Wald NJ, Law M, Hennessy E, Weir D, McPartlin J, Scott J. Randomized trial of folic acid supplementation and serum homocysteine levels. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(5):695-700; PMID:11231701; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.5.695 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[6] Rogers EJ.. Has enhanced folate status during pregnancy altered natural selection and possibly autism prevalence? A closer look at possible link. Med Hypotheses 2008; 71:406-410; PMID:18514430; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.04.013 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[7] Leeming RJ, Lucock M. Autism: is there a folate connection? J Inherit Metab Dis 2009; 32:400-402; PMID:19277892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10545-009-1093-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[8] Lucock M, Leeming R. Autism, seasonality and the environmental perturbation of epigenome related vitamin levels. Med Hypotheses 2013; 80:750-755 Epub 2013; PMID:23566657; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.03.003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[9] Choi J-H, Yates Z, Veysey M, Heo Y-R, Lucock M. Contemporary issues surrounding folic acid fortification initiatives. Prev Nutr Food Sci 2014; 19(4):247-260PMID:25580388; http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2014.19.4.247 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[10] Beard CM, Panser LA, Katusic SK. Is excess folic acid supplementation a risk factor for autism? Med Hypotheses 2011; 77(1):15-17; PMID:21454018; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2011.03.013 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[11] DeSoto MC, Hitlan R Synthetic folic acid supplementation during pregnancy may increase the risk of developing autism. J Pediatr Biochem 2012; 2(4):251-261.
[12] Roy S, Kale A, Dangat K, Sable P, Kulkarni A, Joshi S Maternal micronutrients folic acid and vitamin B12 and omega 3 fatty acids: Implications for neurodevelopmental risk in the rat offspring. Brain Dev-Jpn 2012; 34:64-71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2011.01.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[13] Wiens D, DeWitt A, Kosar M, Underriner C, Finsand M, Freese M. Influence of folic acid on neural connectivity during dorsal root ganglia neurogenesis. Cells Tissues Organs 2016; 201(5):342-353; PMID:27160668; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000444389 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[14] Cammarata GM, Bearce EA, Lowery LA. Cytoskeletal social networking in the growth cone: How +TIPs mediate microtubule-actin cross-linking to drive axon outgrowth and guidance. Cytoskeleton 2016. Epub ahead of print, 2016; PMID:26783725 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[15] Vitriol EA, Zheng JQ. Growth cone travel in space and time: the cellular ensemble of cytoskeleton, adhesion, and membrane. Neuron 2012; 73(6):1068-1081; PMID:22445336; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[16] Lowery LA, Vactor DV. The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10(5):332-343; PMID:19373241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2679 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[17] Corlew R, Wang Y, Ghermazien H, Erisir A, Philpot BD Developmental switch in the contribution of presynaptic and postsynaptic NMDA receptors to long-term depression. J Neurosci 2007; 27:9835-9845; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5494-06.2007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[18] Gill I, Droubi S, Giovedi S, Fedder KN, Bury LA, Bosco F, Sceniak MP, Benfenati F, Sabo SL Presynaptic NMDA receptors–dynamics and distribution in developing axons in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Sci 2015; 128(4):768-780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.162362 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[19] Yang J, Woodhall GL, Jones RS Tonic facilitation of glutamate release by presynaptic NR2B-containing NMDA receptors is increased in the entorhinal cortex of chronically epileptic rats. J Neurosci 2006; 26:406-410; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4413-05.2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[20] Valenzuela CF, Partridge LD, Mameli M, Meyer DA. Modulation of glutamatergic transmission by sulfated steroids: role in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Brain Res Rev 2008; 57:506-519; PMID:17597219; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.04.009 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[21] Ebert DH, Greenberg ME. Activity-dependent neuronal signaling and autism spectrum disorder. Nature 2013; 493(7432):327-337; PMID:23325215; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11860 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[22] Gambrill AC, Barria A. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and synapse stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(14):5855-60; PMID:21427228; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012676108 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[23] Rosenquist TH.. Folate, homocysteine and the cardiac neural crest. Dev Dyn 2013; 242:201-218; PMID:23335187; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.23922 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[24] O'Dell TJ, Christensen BN A voltage-clamp study of isolated stingray horizontal cell non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptors. J Neurophys 1989; 61:165-172. [PubMed]
[25] Rowe JS, Ruddock KH Hyperpolarizing effects of folic acid on retinal horizontal cells. J Physiol Lond 1982; 322:50P.
[26] Fischbach F, Dunning MB Manual of Laboratory and Diagnostic Tests. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Articles from Neurogenesis are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis