PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jvirolPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJV ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Virol. 2016 October 15; 90(20): 9163–9171.
Published online 2016 September 29. Prepublished online 2016 August 3. doi:  10.1128/JVI.01078-16
PMCID: PMC5044852

ITCH E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Interacts with Ebola Virus VP40 To Regulate Budding

D. S. Lyles, Editor
Wake Forest University

ABSTRACT

Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV) belong to the Filoviridae family and can cause outbreaks of severe hemorrhagic fever, with high mortality rates in humans. The EBOV VP40 (eVP40) and MARV VP40 (mVP40) matrix proteins play a central role in virion assembly and egress, such that independent expression of VP40 leads to the production and egress of virus-like particles (VLPs) that accurately mimic the budding of infectious virus. Late (L) budding domains of eVP40 recruit host proteins (e.g., Tsg101, Nedd4, and Alix) that are important for efficient virus egress and spread. For example, the PPxY-type L domain of eVP40 and mVP40 recruits the host Nedd4 E3 ubiquitin ligase via its WW domains to facilitate budding. Here we sought to identify additional WW domain host interactors and demonstrate that the PPxY L domain motif of eVP40 interacts specifically with the WW domain of the host E3 ubiquitin ligase ITCH. ITCH, like Nedd4, is a member of the HECT class of E3 ubiquitin ligases, and the resultant physical and functional interaction with eVP40 facilitates VLP and virus budding. Identification of this novel eVP40 interactor highlights the functional interplay between cellular E3 ligases, ubiquitination, and regulation of VP40-mediated egress.

IMPORTANCE The unprecedented magnitude and scope of the recent 2014-2015 EBOV outbreak in West Africa and its emergence here in the United States and other countries underscore the critical need for a better understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of this emerging pathogen. We have identified a novel and functional EBOV VP40 interactor, ITCH, that regulates VP40-mediated egress. This virus-host interaction may represent a new target for our previously identified small-molecule inhibitors of virus egress.

INTRODUCTION

Filoviruses continue to cause severe outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever in humans, and there are currently no approved vaccines or therapeutics to combat Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV) infections. A better understanding of the interplay between EBOV and host cells will provide new insights into EBOV pathogenesis and identify novel targets for antiviral intervention. EBOV VP40 (eVP40) is the major virion structural protein that plays a crucial role in the assembly and budding of both virus-like particles (VLPs) and infectious virions. Indeed, eVP40 recruits multiple host proteins to facilitate late stages of virion assembly and egress (1,9). For example, the well-described late (L) budding domain motifs (PTAP and PPxY) of eVP40 mediate the recruitment of ESCRT and ESCRT-associated proteins that facilitate complete and efficient virus-cell separation (2, 4, 10,16).

The PPxY core motif recruits WW domain-bearing proteins with diverse functions (17,25). In previous work, we and others demonstrated that the viral PPxY motif within eVP40, MARV VP40 (mVP40), and other viral matrix proteins interacts specifically with WW domains of host Nedd4, a HECT family E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase that is linked with the cellular ESCRT machinery (1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 26,43). In general, viral PPxY/Nedd4 WW domain interactions promote the ubiquitinylation of viral matrix proteins, which is beneficial for efficient virus production (3, 8, 9, 28,31, 35,38, 40,50).

Although the PPxY core motif is important for this interaction, there is a built-in degree of specificity of PPxY/WW domain binding such that specific PPxY-containing proteins will interact physically and functionally with only select WW domain partners (51). In addition, although it is clear that Nedd4 is important for budding, the importance of other WW domain-containing host proteins for virus budding remains to be determined.

To further identify the complement of WW domain proteins capable of binding to the eVP40 PPxY motif, we used an unbiased approach in which we assessed the ability of an EBOV PPxY-containing peptide to bind to a glutathione S-transferase (GST) array of 115 mammalian proteins known to contain one or more WW domain modules (52). Using this technique, we identified ITCH, a HECT family E3 ubiquitin ligase. We used coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) to confirm the previously undescribed PPxY-dependent physical interaction between eVP40 and ITCH and, importantly, demonstrated a functional role for ITCH in eVP40 budding. Indeed, the expression of ITCH not only led to the ubiquitination of eVP40 but also was required for efficient PPxY-mediated egress of eVP40 VLPs and live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the EBOV VP40 PPxY L domain motif (VSV-M40) (14).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines, plasmids, reagents, and viruses.

HEK293T and BHK-21 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 μg/ml) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Human wild-type (WT) HAP1 cells (kindly provided by K. Chandran, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY) and HAP1-ITCH−/− cells (Horizon Discovery) were maintained in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% FCS and penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 μg/ml) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.

Plasmids expressing wild-type eVP40 (eVP40-WT) and eVP40-ΔPT/PY (PTAPPEY deletion mutant) were described previously (3, 32, 53). Plasmids expressing c-myc–ITCH-WT or the enzymatically inactive ITCH-C830A mutant were kindly provided by G. Melino (Leicester University, UK) and were described previously (54). ITCH-specific or random small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were purchased from Dharmacon. the Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1) inhibitor SP600125 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody (MAb) clone 4A6 (catalog number 05-724) was purchased from EMD Millipore. Rabbit anti-ITCH (catalog number SAB4200036), mouse anti-GST (catalog number SAB4200237), mouse antihemagglutinin (anti-HA) (catalog number H9658), and mouse anti-β-actin (catalog number A1978) antisera were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (6C5) was obtained from Abcam (catalog number ab8245). Anti-VSV-M MAb 23H12 was kindly provided by D. Lyles (Wake Forest School of Medicine, NC). Recombinant VSV-M40 was propagated in BHK-21 cells and was described previously (14).

Protein array experiments.

To generate the “proline-rich” reading array, the WW and SH3 domains were codon optimized for bacterial expression and cloned into a pGex vector. All WW and SH3 domains were expressed as GST fusions in Escherichia coli and purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads. The recombinant domains were arrayed onto nitrocellulose-coated glass slides (OncyteAvid slides; Grace Bio-Labs, Bend, OR), using an Aushon 2470 arrayer with solid pins, as described previously (52). Fluorescence labeling of the biotinylated peptide probe and slide binding were also described previously (52). Two peptides were tested on the array: eVP40-WT (MRRVILPTAPPEYMEAI[Lys-biotin]) and eVP40 mutant (MRRVILPTAAAEAMEAI[Lys-biotin]) peptides. The fluorescent signal was detected by using a GeneTac LSIV scanner (Genomic Solutions).

Expression and purification of GST fusion proteins.

GST-WW domain fusion proteins were purified from E. coli BL21(DE3) cells grown in LB broth with appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. GST-WW domain fusion proteins were induced with isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (0.2 mM) for 3 h at 30°C. Bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and lysates were extracted by using B-PER bacterial protein extract reagent according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer (Pierce). GST-WW domain fusion proteins were purified with glutathione-Sepharose 4B and eluted with elution buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 120 mM NaCl, 30 mM reduced glutathione). Purified proteins were analyzed on SDS-PAGE gels and stained with Coomassie blue.

GST peptide pulldown.

Streptavidin-agarose beads (25 μl) (Millipore) were prewashed once with 1× mild buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 15 mM MgCl2), and 15 μg of biotinylated peptide was incubated with prewashed streptavidin beads in 500 μl of 1× mild buffer for 1 h at 4°C with rocking. The beads were then washed three times with mild buffer. Two to three micrograms of the indicated GST-WW domain fusion protein was incubated with the bound peptides in 500 μl of 1× mild buffer for 1 h at 4°C with rocking, and the beads were then washed three times with 1× mild buffer. The beads were suspended with 30 μl of 2× loading buffer with boiling. Ten microliters of supernatants was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with mouse anti-GST antiserum followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.

siRNA analysis.

HEK293T cells in Opti-MEM in collagen-coated 6-well plates were transfected twice with either control siRNAs or ITCH-specific siRNAs at a final concentration of 200 nM by using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) at 2-day intervals. A total of 0.5 μg of eVP40 plasmid DNA was transfected with the second round of siRNAs. Cell extracts and VLPs were harvested at 24 h posttransfection, and the indicated proteins were detected in cell and VLP samples by Western blotting using specific antisera.

IP/Western analysis.

Human HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids by using Lipofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) according to the supplier's protocol. Cells were harvested and lysed in nondenaturing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 137 mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, 2.0 mM EDTA, 2.0 mM EGTA, and 10% glycerol) at 18 to 20 h posttransfection. Cell lysates were clarified for 10 min at 3,000 rpm. Supernatants were incubated with anti-eVP40 or normal IgG (Cell Signaling) for 5 h at 4°C. Protein A-agarose beads (Invitrogen) were added to the samples and incubated with agitation overnight at 4°C. The beads were washed five times in nondenaturing lysis buffer, suspended in loading buffer with boiling, and then fractionated by SDS-PAGE. The indicated proteins were detected in precipitates by Western blotting using specific antisera.

VLP budding assays.

Filovirus VLP budding assays using HEK293T cells and eVP40 only were described previously (3, 6, 29, 32, 55).

Virus infection and titration.

ITCH-WT or HAP1 ITCH knockout (KO) cells were infected with recombinant VSV-M40 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 for 1 h. The inoculum was removed, cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and cells were then incubated in serum-free Opti-MEM for an additional 7 h. At 8 h postinfection, virions were harvested from the medium, and titers were determined by standard plaque assays on BHK-21 cells. Briefly, BHK-21 cells in 6-well plates were washed once with PBS, inoculated with 200 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of virus in serum-free DMEM in triplicate, and incubated for 1 h. The inoculum was removed, and cells were washed three times with PBS and then incubated with 2 ml of Eagle's MEM containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% methylcellulose at 37°C for 36 to 48 h until plaques were observed. Cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained with a crystal violet solution. Infected cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitors). VSV M protein was detected by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-VSV-M monoclonal antibody 23H12.

RESULTS

Binding of eVP40 PPxY to host WW domain arrays.

To identify WW domain-bearing host proteins capable of interacting with the proline-rich PPxY motif of eVP40, we prepared biotinylated peptides harboring either the WT PPxY motif (MRRVILPTAPPEYMEAI) or a mutated PPxY motif (MRRVILPTAAAEAMEAI) (motifs are indicated in boldface type). The biotinylated peptides were fluorescently labeled and used to screen a specially prepared proline-rich reading array composed of almost all known WW domain-containing (115 domains) and a large number of SH3 domain-containing (40 domains) proteins. The WT eVP40 PPxY motif-containing peptide bound robustly to select WW domains, including, but not limited to, Nedd4 (WW domain 3 [WW3], as expected), Nedd4L (WW3), and ITCH (WW1) (Fig. 1A). As expected, no interactions were observed between the WT eVP40 peptide and any of the SH3 domains (data not shown). In addition, no interaction was observed between the PPxY mutant peptide and any of the WW or SH3 domains (data not shown). We confirmed these three specific interactions using purified GST-WW domain fusion proteins (Fig. 1B) and a GST pulldown assay to demonstrate that the WT eVP40 peptide (Fig. 1C, lanes 1), but not the PPxY mutant peptide (Fig. 1C, lanes 2), interacted with WW1 from ITCH, WW3 from Nedd4, and WW3 from Nedd4L. These findings underscore the high degree of specificity possessed by the eVP40 PPxY motif, suggesting that the newly identified eVP40 interactor ITCH is likely to play an important biological role in the EBOV life cycle, as the PPxY motif targets and binds to only select host WW domains.

FIG 1
GST-WW domain pulldown of the eVP40 PPxY peptide. (A) Identification of eVP40 PPxY motif readers using fluorescently labeled biotinylated peptides to screen a proline-rich reading array. The GST-WW domain fusion proteins are arrayed in duplicate, at different ...

Co-IP of eVP40 and ITCH.

We next sought to confirm the above-described eVP40-ITCH interaction in mammalian cells. Briefly, HEK293T cells were transfected with eVP40-WT, ITCH-WT, and/or an enzymatically inactive ITCH-C830A mutant (Fig. 2A). Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with either rabbit preimmune IgG (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 to 3) or polyclonal anti-eVP40 antiserum (Fig. 2A, lanes 4 to 6), and c-myc-tagged ITCH was detected in precipitated samples by Western blotting using anti-c-myc antiserum. Both ITCH-WT and ITCH-C830A were detected in eVP40 precipitates (Fig. 2A, lanes 5 and 6) but not in preimmune IgG precipitates of identical samples (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3). These results indicated that eVP40-WT interacts with both WT and enzymatically inactive forms of ITCH in transiently transfected HEK293T cells, albeit the interaction between eVP40 and ITCH-C830A was reduced slightly compared to that between eVP40 and ITCH-WT (Fig. 2A).

FIG 2
ITCH interacts with eVP40 in a PPxY-dependent manner. (A and B) Extracts from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids were first immunoprecipitated (IP) with either rabbit preimmune serum (IgG) or polyclonal anti-eVP40 antiserum, and c- ...

We next sought to determine whether this interaction was dependent on the eVP40 PPxY motif. To this end, HEK293T cells were transfected with eVP40-WT, eVP40-ΔPT/PY, and/or ITCH-WT (Fig. 2B). Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with either rabbit preimmune IgG (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 to 4) or polyclonal anti-eVP40 antiserum (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 to 8), and c-myc-tagged ITCH was detected in precipitated samples by Western blotting using anti-c-myc antiserum. ITCH was detected in eVP40 precipitates from cells expressing eVP40-WT and ITCH-WT (Fig. 2B, lane 6) but not in those from cells expressing eVP40-ΔPT/PY and ITCH-WT (Fig. 2B, lane 8). As expected, ITCH was not detected in preimmune IgG precipitates of identical samples (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 4). These results indicate that the eVP40-ITCH interaction is PPxY dependent, which correlates well with GST pulldown results (Fig. 1).

Since ITCH interacts with eVP40, we asked whether eVP40 was ubiquitinated by ITCH. To test this, HEK293T cells were transfected with combinations of plasmids encoding eVP40, ITCH-WT, ITCH-C830A (inactive mutant), and/or Ub-HA (Fig. 2C). Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with either rabbit preimmune IgG (Fig. 2C, lanes 1 to 3) or polyclonal anti-eVP40 antiserum (Fig. 2C, lanes 4 to 6), and HA-tagged ubiquitin was detected in precipitated samples by Western analysis. Ubiquitinated species of eVP40 that corresponded in size to mono- and diubiquitinated forms were detected in cells expressing eVP40, ITCH-WT, and Ub-HA (Fig. 2C, lane 5) but not in cells expressing either eVP40 and Ub-HA (lane 4) or eVP40, ITCH-C830A, and Ub-HA (lane 6). Together, these results demonstrate a physical and functional interaction between ITCH and eVP40 leading to the ubiquitination of eVP40. Western analysis of cell extracts corresponding to those shown Fig. 2A to toCC revealed appropriate expression levels of eVP40, eVP40-ΔPT/PY, ITCH-WT, ITCH-C830A, and actin (Fig. 3A to toCC).

FIG 3
Western analysis of expression controls for the indicted proteins from cell extracts shown in Fig. 2. Extracts from HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids.

Enzymatically active ITCH ligase enhances eVP40 VLP budding.

Next, we sought to confirm that overexpression of enzymatically active ITCH enhances the egress of eVP40 VLPs. To this end, HEK293T cells were transfected with constant amounts of eVP40 and increasing amounts of either ITCH-WT or ITCH-C830A plasmid DNA (Fig. 4A). Cell extracts and VLPs were harvested, and the indicated proteins were detected by Western analysis (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, we observed a consistent 2- to 3-fold increase (Fig. 4B) in eVP40 VLP budding in the presence of exogenous ITCH-WT (Fig. 4A, compare lane 2 with lanes 3 and 4) but not in the presence of exogenous ITCH-C830A (compare lane 2 with lanes 5 and 6) compared to the eVP40-alone control. Indeed, overexpression of ITCH-C830A appeared to have a dominant negative effect on the budding of eVP40 VLPs, as levels of eVP40 in VLP samples expressing ITCH-C830A were reduced compared to those in samples expressing eVP40 alone (Fig. 4A). We also detected ITCH-WT, but not ITCH-C830A, in budding VLPs (Fig. 4A), which supports a functional role for ITCH in budding, as other host proteins important for budding (e.g., Nedd4 and Tsg101) are also packaged into VLPs (14, 32).

FIG 4
Enzymatically active ITCH enhances eVP40 VLP budding. (A) Western analysis of cell extracts and VLPs from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. (B) Budding efficiency of eVP40 VLPs in the presence of exogenous ITCH-WT relative to that ...

We used a pharmacological approach to demonstrate that the activation of ITCH ligase was critical for the enhanced egress of eVP40 VLPs. Activation of ITCH ligase depends on phosphorylation by Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) (56). As SP600125 is a well-described, selective inhibitor of JNK activity (57, 58), we reasoned that SP600125 may inhibit the egress of eVP40 VLPs by blocking JNK-mediated activation of ITCH. To test this, HEK293T cells were transfected with eVP40 in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of SP600125, and eVP40 in cell extracts and VLPs was detected by Western analysis (Fig. 4C). Indeed, we found that budding of eVP40 VLPs was reduced by ~10- and 20-fold in the presence of 5 and 10 μM SP600125, respectively (Fig. 4C, compare lane 2 with lanes 3 and 4). SP600125 had little (<2-fold) to no effect on the cellular expression of eVP40 and endogenous ITCH (Fig. 4C). Together, these data not only confirm that enzymatically active ITCH is required for the efficient egress of eVP40 VLPs but also imply that a pharmacological approach targeting this host pathway may represent a viable and novel strategy to target and inhibit virus egress.

ITCH is required for efficient eVP40 VLP egress.

To further confirm that the interaction between eVP40 and ITCH was functionally relevant for eVP40 VLP budding, we used an siRNA knockdown/rescue approach. Briefly, HEK293T cells were mock transfected or transfected with eVP40-WT plus random or ITCH-specific siRNAs (Fig. 5A). Expression of eVP40-WT and efficient knockdown of endogenous ITCH (>90%) were confirmed by Western analysis (Fig. 5A). We found that the knockdown of endogenous ITCH resulted in a 75 to 80% decrease in the egress of eVP40 VLPs compared to random siRNA controls (Fig. 5A).

FIG 5
siRNA knockdown/rescue of ITCH regulates eVP40 VLP budding. (A) Western analysis of eVP40, endogenous ITCH, and actin in extracts and VLPs from HEK293T cells mock treated or treated with the indicated siRNAs. (B) HEK293T cells were transfected as indicated, ...

To validate these siRNA results, we attempted to rescue eVP40 VLP budding in ITCH siRNA knockdown cells by transiently expressing exogenous ITCH-WT or ITCH-C830A (Fig. 5B). Western analysis was used to detect and confirm the expression of eVP40-WT and endogenous and exogenous ITCH in cell extracts (Fig. 5B). As described above, cells receiving ITCH-specific siRNAs showed an ~75% decrease in eVP40 VLP egress compared to random siRNA controls (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 2 and 3). Interestingly, budding of eVP40 VLPs was enhanced by ~3-fold in cells expressing exogenous ITCH-WT compared to control samples (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 2 and 4), whereas no enhancement of eVP40 VLP egress was observed in cells expressing exogenous ITCH-C830A (Fig. 5B, compare lanes 2 and 5). These results confirm that knockdown of endogenous ITCH in HEK293T cells resulted in a 4- to 5-fold decrease in eVP40 VLP egress in multiple experiments (Fig. 5C) and, importantly, that the enzymatic activity of ITCH ligase was required for the efficient egress of eVP40 VLPs.

Reduced budding of VLPs and virus from ITCH knockout cells.

We next took advantage of the HAP1-ITCH−/− (KO) cell line as a genetic approach to determine whether the expression of endogenous ITCH is critical for the efficient egress of both eVP40 VLPs and live recombinant VSV expressing the eVP40 PPxY L domain motif and flanking residues. Briefly, parental HAP1 cells expressing endogenous ITCH (ITCH-WT) and HAP1 ITCH-KO cells were transfected with eVP40, and eVP40 was detected in cell extracts and VLPs at 24 h posttransfection by Western analysis (Fig. 6A). We found that budding of eVP40 VLPs was reduced in multiple independent experiments by up to 20-fold in ITCH KO cells compared to that in ITCH-WT cells (Fig. 6A and andB).B). Equal expression of eVP40 and the absence of ITCH in the KO cell line were confirmed by Western analysis (Fig. 6A).

FIG 6
eVP40 VLP budding from ITCH WT and KO cells. (A) HAP1 ITCH-WT (parental) or HAP1 ITCH KO cells were transfected with an eVP40 expression plasmid, and the indicated proteins were detected in cell extracts and VLPs by Western analysis. (B) Budding of eVP40 ...

To confirm that the reduced levels of eVP40 VLP egress were due to the lack of ITCH expression in KO cells, ITCH KO cells were transfected with eVP40 alone or in combination with ITCH-WT, and eVP40 was detected in cell extracts and VLPs by Western analysis (Fig. 6C). Indeed, we observed an ~8-fold increase in eVP40 VLP budding from KO cells receiving exogenous ITCH-WT compared to that from KO cells expressing eVP40 alone (Fig. 6C and andD).D). Appropriate levels of eVP40 and ITCH-WT in cell extracts were confirmed by Western analysis (Fig. 6C).

We next asked whether the decrease in eVP40 VLP budding from ITCH KO cells would also be observed for live-virus budding. To test this, we utilized our previously described recombinant VSV (VSV-M40) that was engineered to express the PPxY L domain motif and flanking residues from eVP40 in place of the PPxY L domain and flanking residues of VSV-M (14). Parental and ITCH KO cells were infected with VSV-M40 at an MOI of 0.1, and infected-cell extracts and supernatants were harvested at the peak budding time of 8 h postinfection (Fig. 7). Infectious virions released into the medium were quantified by standard plaque assays on BHK-21 cells, and these data revealed a >1-log decrease in the average titer of VSV-M40 in ITCH KO cells compared to that in parental ITCH-WT cells (Fig. 7). Western analysis of infected-cell extracts confirmed the lack of ITCH expression in KO cells and that the expression levels of the VSV M protein in WT and KO cells were equivalent and unaffected by the lack of ITCH expression (Fig. 7). It should be noted that a similar degree of budding inhibition was observed for WT VSV, whose M protein contains a PPxY L domain motif (data not shown). These data suggest that, like Nedd4, ITCH plays a role in facilitating the budding of multiple negative-strand RNA viruses that depend on a PPxY-type L domain for efficient egress.

FIG 7
Decreased budding of live recombinant VSV-M40 in ITCH KO cells. HAP1 ITCH-WT (parental) or HAP1 ITCH KO cells were infected with recombinant VSV-M40, and virus titers were quantified by plaque assays at 8 h postinfection. Virus titers from ITCH KO cells ...

DISCUSSION

EBOV VP40 is the major viral structural protein that orchestrates virion assembly and egress. EBOV VP40 accomplishes this, in part, by hijacking or recruiting host proteins/pathways to facilitate efficient virus separation from the site of budding at the plasma membrane. Here we have identified ITCH as a novel eVP40 interactor that regulates the budding process.

A role for cellular ubiquitination and particularly the E3 ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 in promoting the efficient budding of many enveloped RNA viruses, including EBOV, has been well documented (3, 8, 9, 26,30, 32,43, 59, 60). ITCH is one of nine members of the Nedd4 family of HECT-type E3 ligases with canonical C2, WW, and HECT domains as their main functional components (61). Of all the mammalian WW domains tested here, we identified WW domain 1 (WW1) of ITCH as one of the strongest, specific interactors with the PPxY motif of eVP40 (Fig. 1). Indeed, the high degree of specificity of the eVP40 PPxY motif for binding to only select mammalian WW domains in our WW and SH3 domain array strongly suggests that the interacting host proteins likely play biologically meaningful roles in the life cycle of EBOV. As both Nedd4 and ITCH appear to be recruited to the eVP40 PPxY motif, our results raised the intriguing possibility that these related HECT-type E3 ligases may be recruited by eVP40 to provide analogous or perhaps cell type-specific functions to promote the late stages of virus assembly and egress. Indeed, other Nedd4-like E3 ligases have been implicated in the assembly and egress of several RNA viruses (28, 39, 41, 62, 63). It is possible that WW domain selectivity depends in part on the sequence of the WW domain itself and/or modifications of the PPxY ligand, such as tyrosine phosphorylation (64).

We confirmed both the physical and functional nature of the ITCH WW domain-eVP40 PPxY interaction using both VLP and live-virus budding assays (Fig. 5 to to7).7). Although a role for the ITCH E3 ubiquitin ligase as a novel host contributor to eVP40-mediated budding has not been reported previously, ITCH was identified previously as a functional contributor to the budding process of some retroviruses (63, 65,67). ITCH has been more widely studied for its role in immune regulation and inflammatory signaling, such as its ability to regulate lymphocyte activation, differentiation, and immune tolerance (for a review, see reference 68). Whether there is any link between the immune-regulatory activities of ITCH and its role in promoting virus egress remains to be determined, as does a role for ITCH in facilitating egress and modulating the pathogenesis of infectious EBOV. Nonetheless, we demonstrated that (i) the eVP40-ITCH interaction is PPxY dependent, (ii) enzymatically active ITCH ubiquitinated eVP40, (iii) siRNA or genetic knockdown of endogenous ITCH in HAP1 cells resulted in a decrease in eVP40 VLP and live-VSV-M40 egress, and (iv) the addition of enzymatically active ITCH rescued this budding defect.

While evidence for the “probudding” role of ubiquitination and E3 ligases such as Nedd4 and ITCH continues to accumulate, a counteracting and antagonistic “antibudding” role for host interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) and ISGylation (covalent modification of a target protein with ISG15) is emerging. ISG15 is an interferon (IFN)-induced ubiquitin-like protein that plays a key role as a central regulator of the innate immune response to a plethora of viral pathogens (69, 70; for reviews, see references 71 and 72). Indeed, we and others found that free/unconjugated ISG15 interferes with Nedd4 ligase activity, thereby preventing its functional interaction with eVP40 and indirectly preventing the budding of eVP40 VLPs (53, 72, 73). It will be of interest to determine whether this mechanistically novel function for ISG15 (53, 73) and the functional interplay between ubiquitination and ISGylation pathways extend to ITCH ligase as well.

In sum, our results provide new insights into the range of host proteins that regulate EBOV VP40-mediated egress. While we predict that ITCH should also interact with the PPxY motif of MARV VP40, this remains to be determined. A better understanding of this ongoing battle and interplay between the virus and early host innate immune defenses will be critical for our overall understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of the virus as well as for the future development of effective antiviral therapies. Indeed, we have identified small-molecule inhibitors of virus-host interactions, including those that target PPxY-WW domain interactions, with promising potential as broad-spectrum antiviral therapeutics (29, 55, 74).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank G. Melino, K. Chandran, T. Brummelkamp, and D. Lyles for kindly providing reagents; C. Berry for help with statistical analysis; L. King for critical reading of the manuscript; and B. D. Freedman, J. Madara, G. Ruthel, X. Liu, J. Li, and J. Liang for helpful comments.

This work was supported in part by NIH grants AI102104, AI113952, and AI103785 to R.N.H.; by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant RP13042 to M.T.B. for the protein array analysis; and by seed grants from the National University of Singapore Medical School and Mechanobiology Institute in Singapore to M.S.

REFERENCES

1. Han Z, Madara JJ, Liu Y, Liu W, Ruthel G, Freedman BD, Harty RN 2015. ALIX rescues budding of a double PTAP/PPEY L-domain deletion mutant of Ebola VP40: a role for ALIX in Ebola virus egress. J Infect Dis 212(Suppl 2):S138–S145. doi:.10.1093/infdis/jiu838 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Hartlieb B, Weissenhorn W 2006. Filovirus assembly and budding. Virology 344:64–70. doi:.10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.018 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Harty RN, Brown ME, Wang G, Huibregtse J, Hayes FP 2000. A PPxY motif within the VP40 protein of Ebola virus interacts physically and functionally with a ubiquitin ligase: implications for filovirus budding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13871–13876. doi:.10.1073/pnas.250277297 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Jasenosky LD, Kawaoka Y 2004. Filovirus budding. Virus Res 106:181–188. doi:.10.1016/j.virusres.2004.08.014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Liu Y, Lee MS, Olson MA, Harty RN 2011. Bimolecular complementation to visualize filovirus VP40-host complexes in live mammalian cells: toward the identification of budding inhibitors. Adv Virol 2011:341816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Lu J, Qu Y, Liu Y, Jambusaria R, Han Z, Ruthel G, Freedman BD, Harty RN 2013. Host IQGAP1 and Ebola virus VP40 interactions facilitate virus-like particle egress. J Virol 87:7777–7780. doi:.10.1128/JVI.00470-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Noda T, Ebihara H, Muramoto Y, Fujii K, Takada A, Sagara H, Kim JH, Kida H, Feldmann H, Kawaoka Y 2006. Assembly and budding of ebolavirus. PLoS Pathog 2:e99. doi:.10.1371/journal.ppat.0020099 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Timmins J, Schoehn G, Ricard-Blum S, Scianimanico S, Vernet T, Ruigrok RW, Weissenhorn W 2003. Ebola virus matrix protein VP40 interaction with human cellular factors Tsg101 and Nedd4. J Mol Biol 326:493–502. doi:.10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01406-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Yasuda J, Nakao M, Kawaoka Y, Shida H 2003. Nedd4 regulates egress of Ebola virus-like particles from host cells. J Virol 77:9987–9992. doi:.10.1128/JVI.77.18.9987-9992.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Bieniasz PD. 2006. Late budding domains and host proteins in enveloped virus release. Virology 344:55–63. doi:.10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.044 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Calistri A, Salata C, Parolin C, Palu G 2009. Role of multivesicular bodies and their components in the egress of enveloped RNA viruses. Rev Med Virol 19:31–45. doi:.10.1002/rmv.588 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Chen BJ, Lamb RA 2008. Mechanisms for enveloped virus budding: can some viruses do without an ESCRT? Virology 372:221–232. doi:.10.1016/j.virol.2007.11.008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Harty RN. 2009. No exit: targeting the budding process to inhibit filovirus replication. Antiviral Res 81:189–197. doi:.10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.12.003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Irie T, Licata JM, Harty RN 2005. Functional characterization of Ebola virus L-domains using VSV recombinants. Virology 336:291–298. doi:.10.1016/j.virol.2005.03.027 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Liu Y, Harty RN 2010. Viral and host proteins that modulate filovirus budding. Future Virol 5:481–491. doi:.10.2217/fvl.10.33 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Urata S, de la Torre JC 2011. Arenavirus budding. Adv Virol 2011:180326. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Bork P, Sudol M 1994. The WW domain: a signalling site in dystrophin? Trends Biochem Sci 19:531–533. doi:.10.1016/0968-0004(94)90053-1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Chen HI, Sudol M 1995. The WW domain of Yes-associated protein binds a proline-rich ligand that differs from the consensus established for Src homology 3-binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:7819–7823. doi:.10.1073/pnas.92.17.7819 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Hu H, Columbus J, Zhang Y, Wu D, Lian L, Yang S, Goodwin J, Luczak C, Carter M, Chen L, James M, Davis R, Sudol M, Rodwell J, Herrero JJ 2004. A map of WW domain family interactions. Proteomics 4:643–655. doi:.10.1002/pmic.200300632 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Ilsley JL, Sudol M, Winder SJ 2002. The WW domain: linking cell signalling to the membrane cytoskeleton. Cell Signal 14:183–189. doi:.10.1016/S0898-6568(01)00236-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Sudol M. 1996. Structure and function of the WW domain. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 65:113–132. [PubMed]
22. Sudol M. 1996. The WW module competes with the SH3 domain? Trends Biochem Sci 21:161–163. doi:.10.1016/S0968-0004(96)30018-2 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Sudol M, Chen HI, Bougeret C, Einbond A, Bork P 1995. Characterization of a novel protein-binding module—the WW domain. FEBS Lett 369:67–71. doi:.10.1016/0014-5793(95)00550-S [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Sudol M, Hunter T 2000. NeW wrinkles for an old domain. Cell 103:1001–1004. doi:.10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00203-8 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Sudol M, Sliwa K, Russo T 2001. Functions of WW domains in the nucleus. FEBS Lett 490:190–195. doi:.10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02122-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Blot V, Perugi F, Gay B, Prevost MC, Briant L, Tangy F, Abriel H, Staub O, Dokhelar MC, Pique C 2004. Nedd4.1-mediated ubiquitination and subsequent recruitment of Tsg101 ensure HTLV-1 Gag trafficking towards the multivesicular body pathway prior to virus budding. J Cell Sci 117:2357–2367. doi:.10.1242/jcs.01095 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Bouamr F, Melillo JA, Wang MQ, Nagashima K, de Los Santos M, Rein A, Goff SP 2003. PPPYEPTAP motif is the late domain of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Gag and mediates its functional interaction with cellular proteins Nedd4 and Tsg101. J Virol 77:11882–11895. doi: (Author Correction, 78: 4383, 2004, doi:.)10.1128/JVI.77.22.11882-11895.200310.1128/JVI.78.8.4383.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Chung HY, Morita E, von Schwedler U, Muller B, Krausslich HG, Sundquist WI 2008. NEDD4L overexpression rescues the release and infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 constructs lacking PTAP and YPXL late domains. J Virol 82:4884–4897. doi:.10.1128/JVI.02667-07 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Han Z, Lu J, Liu Y, Davis B, Lee MS, Olson MA, Ruthel G, Freedman BD, Schnell MJ, Wrobel JE, Reitz AB, Harty RN 2014. Small-molecule probes targeting the viral PPxY-host Nedd4 interface block egress of a broad range of RNA viruses. J Virol 88:7294–7306. doi:.10.1128/JVI.00591-14 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Harty RN, Brown ME, McGettigan JP, Wang G, Jayakar HR, Huibregtse JM, Whitt MA, Schnell MJ 2001. Rhabdoviruses and the cellular ubiquitin-proteasome system: a budding interaction. J Virol 75:10623–10629. doi:.10.1128/JVI.75.22.10623-10629.2001 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Kikonyogo A, Bouamr F, Vana ML, Xiang Y, Aiyar A, Carter C, Leis J 2001. Proteins related to the Nedd4 family of ubiquitin protein ligases interact with the L domain of Rous sarcoma virus and are required for gag budding from cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11199–11204. doi:.10.1073/pnas.201268998 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Licata JM, Simpson-Holley M, Wright NT, Han Z, Paragas J, Harty RN 2003. Overlapping motifs (PTAP and PPEY) within the Ebola virus VP40 protein function independently as late budding domains: involvement of host proteins TSG101 and VPS-4. J Virol 77:1812–1819. doi:.10.1128/JVI.77.3.1812-1819.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Martin-Serrano J, Perez-Caballero D, Bieniasz PD 2004. Context-dependent effects of L domains and ubiquitination on viral budding. J Virol 78:5554–5563. doi:.10.1128/JVI.78.11.5554-5563.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Medina G, Pincetic A, Ehrlich LS, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Leis J, Carter CA 2008. Tsg101 can replace Nedd4 function in ASV Gag release but not membrane targeting. Virology 377:30–38. doi:.10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.024 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Sakurai A, Yasuda J, Takano H, Tanaka Y, Hatakeyama M, Shida H 2004. Regulation of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) budding by ubiquitin ligase Nedd4. Microbes Infect 6:150–156. doi:.10.1016/j.micinf.2003.10.011 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Sette P, Jadwin JA, Dussupt V, Bello NF, Bouamr F 2010. The ESCRT-associated protein Alix recruits the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-1 to facilitate HIV-1 release through the LYPXnL L domain motif. J Virol 84:8181–8192. doi:.10.1128/JVI.00634-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Sette P, Nagashima K, Piper RC, Bouamr F 2013. Ubiquitin conjugation to Gag is essential for ESCRT-mediated HIV-1 budding. Retrovirology 10:79. doi:.10.1186/1742-4690-10-79 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Urata S, Yasuda J 2010. Regulation of Marburg virus (MARV) budding by Nedd4.1: a different WW domain of Nedd4.1 is critical for binding to MARV and Ebola virus VP40. J Gen Virol 91:228–234. doi:.10.1099/vir.0.015495-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Usami Y, Popov S, Popova E, Gottlinger HG 2008. Efficient and specific rescue of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 budding defects by a Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase. J Virol 82:4898–4907. doi:.10.1128/JVI.02675-07 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Vana ML, Tang Y, Chen A, Medina G, Carter C, Leis J 2004. Role of Nedd4 and ubiquitination of Rous sarcoma virus Gag in budding of virus-like particles from cells. J Virol 78:13943–13953. doi:.10.1128/JVI.78.24.13943-13953.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Weiss ER, Popova E, Yamanaka H, Kim HC, Huibregtse JM, Gottlinger H 2010. Rescue of HIV-1 release by targeting widely divergent NEDD4-type ubiquitin ligases and isolated catalytic HECT domains to Gag. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001107. doi:.10.1371/journal.ppat.1001107 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Yasuda J, Hunter E, Nakao M, Shida H 2002. Functional involvement of a novel Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase on retrovirus budding. EMBO Rep 3:636–640. doi:.10.1093/embo-reports/kvf132 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Zhadina M, Bieniasz PD 2010. Functional interchangeability of late domains, late domain cofactors and ubiquitin in viral budding. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001153. doi:.10.1371/journal.ppat.1001153 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Calistri A, Del Vecchio C, Salata C, Celestino M, Celegato M, Gottlinger H, Palu G, Parolin C 2009. Role of the feline immunodeficiency virus L-domain in the presence or absence of Gag processing: involvement of ubiquitin and Nedd4-2s ligase in viral egress. J Cell Physiol 218:175–182. doi:.10.1002/jcp.21587 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Klinger PP, Schubert U 2005. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in HIV replication: potential targets for antiretroviral therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 3:61–79. doi:.10.1586/14787210.3.1.61 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Lewis B, Whitney S, Hudacik L, Galmin L, Huaman MC, Cristillo AD 2014. Nedd4-mediated increase in HIV-1 Gag and Env proteins and immunity following DNA-vaccination of BALB/c mice. PLoS One 9:e91267. doi:.10.1371/journal.pone.0091267 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Pincetic A, Medina G, Carter C, Leis J 2008. Avian sarcoma virus and human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 use different subsets of ESCRT proteins to facilitate the budding process. J Biol Chem 283:29822–29830. doi:.10.1074/jbc.M804157200 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Urata S, Noda T, Kawaoka Y, Yokosawa H, Yasuda J 2006. Cellular factors required for Lassa virus budding. J Virol 80:4191–4195. doi:.10.1128/JVI.80.8.4191-4195.2006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Usami Y, Popov S, Popova E, Inoue M, Weissenhorn W, Gottlinger GH 2009. The ESCRT pathway and HIV-1 budding. Biochem Soc Trans 37:181–184. doi:.10.1042/BST0370181 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Zhadina M, McClure MO, Johnson MC, Bieniasz PD 2007. Ubiquitin-dependent virus particle budding without viral protein ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20031–20036. doi:.10.1073/pnas.0708002104 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Einbond A, Sudol M 1996. Towards prediction of cognate complexes between the WW domain and proline-rich ligands. FEBS Lett 384:1–8. doi:.10.1016/0014-5793(96)00263-3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Espejo A, Cote J, Bednarek A, Richard S, Bedford MT 2002. A protein-domain microarray identifies novel protein-protein interactions. Biochem J 367:697–702. doi:.10.1042/bj20020860 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Okumura A, Pitha PM, Harty RN 2008. ISG15 inhibits Ebola VP40 VLP budding in an L-domain-dependent manner by blocking Nedd4 ligase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3974–3979. doi:.10.1073/pnas.0710629105 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Rossi M, Rotblat B, Ansell K, Amelio I, Caraglia M, Misso G, Bernassola F, Cavasotto CN, Knight RA, Ciechanover A, Melino G 2014. High throughput screening for inhibitors of the HECT ubiquitin E3 ligase ITCH identifies antidepressant drugs as regulators of autophagy. Cell Death Dis 5:e1203. doi:.10.1038/cddis.2014.113 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Lu J, Han Z, Liu Y, Liu W, Lee MS, Olson MA, Ruthel G, Freedman BD, Harty RN 2014. A host-oriented inhibitor of Junin Argentine hemorrhagic fever virus egress. J Virol 88:4736–4743. doi:.10.1128/JVI.03757-13 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Gao M, Labuda T, Xia Y, Gallagher E, Fang D, Liu YC, Karin M 2004. Jun turnover is controlled through JNK-dependent phosphorylation of the E3 ligase Itch. Science 306:271–275. doi:.10.1126/science.1099414 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
57. Cheng J, Fan YH, Xu X, Zhang H, Dou J, Tang Y, Zhong X, Rojas Y, Yu Y, Zhao Y, Vasudevan SA, Zhang H, Nuchtern JG, Kim ES, Chen X, Lu F, Yang J 2014. A small-molecule inhibitor of UBE2N induces neuroblastoma cell death via activation of p53 and JNK pathways. Cell Death Dis 5:e1079. doi:.10.1038/cddis.2014.54 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
58. Diao L, Zhang B, Xuan C, Sun S, Yang K, Tang Y, Qiao W, Chen Q, Geng Y, Wang C 2005. Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway by HSV-1 immediate early protein ICP0. Exp Cell Res 308:196–210. doi:.10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.04.016 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Gottwein E, Bodem J, Muller B, Schmechel A, Zentgraf H, Krausslich HG 2003. The Mason-Pfizer monkey virus PPPY and PSAP motifs both contribute to virus release. J Virol 77:9474–9485. doi:.10.1128/JVI.77.17.9474-9485.2003 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
60. Segura-Morales C, Pescia C, Chatellard-Causse C, Sadoul R, Bertrand E, Basyuk E 2005. Tsg101 and Alix interact with murine leukemia virus Gag and cooperate with Nedd4 ubiquitin ligases during budding. J Biol Chem 280:27004–27012. doi:.10.1074/jbc.M413735200 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
61. Rotin D, Kumar S 2009. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:398–409. doi:.10.1038/nrm2690 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
62. Heidecker G, Lloyd PA, Soheilian F, Nagashima K, Derse D 2007. The role of WWP1-Gag interaction and Gag ubiquitination in assembly and release of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1. J Virol 81:9769–9777. doi:.10.1128/JVI.00642-07 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
63. Martin-Serrano J, Eastman SW, Chung W, Bieniasz PD 2005. HECT ubiquitin ligases link viral and cellular PPXY motifs to the vacuolar protein-sorting pathway. J Cell Biol 168:89–101. doi:.10.1083/jcb.200408155 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
64. Garcia M, Cooper A, Shi W, Bornmann W, Carrion R, Kalman D, Nabel GJ 2012. Productive replication of Ebola virus is regulated by the c-Abl1 tyrosine kinase. Sci Transl Med 4:123ra24. doi:.10.1126/scitranslmed.3003500 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
65. Dorjbal B, Derse D, Lloyd P, Soheilian F, Nagashima K, Heidecker G 2011. The role of ITCH protein in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 release. J Biol Chem 286:31092–31104. doi:.10.1074/jbc.M111.259945 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
66. Jadwin JA, Rudd V, Sette P, Challa S, Bouamr F 2010. Late domain-independent rescue of a release-deficient Moloney murine leukemia virus by the ubiquitin ligase Itch. J Virol 84:704–715. doi:.10.1128/JVI.01319-09 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
67. Rauch S, Martin-Serrano J 2011. Multiple interactions between the ESCRT machinery and arrestin-related proteins: implications for PPXY-dependent budding. J Virol 85:3546–3556. doi:.10.1128/JVI.02045-10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
68. Venuprasad K, Zeng M, Baughan SL, Massoumi R 2015. Multifaceted role of the ubiquitin ligase Itch in immune regulation. Immunol Cell Biol 93:452–460. doi:.10.1038/icb.2014.118 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
69. Morales DJ, Lenschow DJ 2013. The antiviral activities of ISG15. J Mol Biol 425:4995–5008. doi:.10.1016/j.jmb.2013.09.041 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
70. Zhu ZX, Wei JC, Shi ZX, Wu KB, Ma ZY 2012. Advances in ubiquitin-like protein ISG15-mediated anti-viral response. Bing Du Xue Bao 28:78–83. (In Chinese.) [PubMed]
71. Campbell JA, Lenschow DJ 2013. Emerging roles for immunomodulatory functions of free ISG15. J Interferon Cytokine Res 33:728–738. doi:.10.1089/jir.2013.0064 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
72. Harty RN, Pitha PM, Okumura A 2009. Antiviral activity of innate immune protein ISG15. J Innate Immun 1:397–404. doi:.10.1159/000226245 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
73. Malakhova OA, Zhang DE 2008. ISG15 inhibits Nedd4 ubiquitin E3 activity and enhances the innate antiviral response. J Biol Chem 283:8783–8787. doi:.10.1074/jbc.C800030200 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
74. Madara JJ, Han Z, Ruthel G, Freedman BD, Harty RN 2015. The multifunctional Ebola virus VP40 matrix protein is a promising therapeutic target. Future Virol 10:537–546. doi:.10.2217/fvl.15.6 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)