PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 September 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5012295
NIHMSID: NIHMS800154

Novel Evasion Mechanisms of the Classical Complement Pathway

Abstract

Complement is a network of soluble and cell surface-associated proteins which gives rise to a self-amplifying, yet tightly regulated system with fundamental roles in immune surveillance and clearance. Complement becomes activated on the surface of ‘non-self’ cells by one of three initiating mechanisms known as the classical, lectin, or alternative pathways. Evasion of complement function is a hallmark of invasive pathogens and hematophagous organisms. While many complement inhibition strategies hinge on hijacking activities of endogenous complement regulatory proteins, an increasing number of uniquely evolved evasion molecules have been discovered over the past decade. In this review we focus on several recent investigations which have revealed mechanistically distinct inhibitors of the classical pathway. Because the classical pathway is an important and specific mediator of various autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, in-depth knowledge of novel evasion mechanisms could direct future development of therapeutic anti-inflammatory molecules.

Preface

The human complement system is comprised of a collection of cell surface and circulating plasma proteins that mediate important functions in innate and adaptive immune responses (1). Complement provides protection against microbial infections via activation of a proteolytic cascade that ultimately results in rapid clearance of target cells. Important effector functions of the complement system include: a) labeling microbes for phagocytosis by immune cells; b) recruitment of phagocytes to the site of infection; c) the direct assembly of a pore-forming complex known as the membrane attack complex (MAC) on susceptible membranes; and d) enhancement of adaptive immunity.

Complement evasion molecules have been found in a considerable number of microbial pathogens (2) and hematophagous organisms including mosquitos (3), ticks (47), mites (8), and several species of sanguinivorous flies (911). Thus, it appears organisms whose lifestyles involve contact with blood and related bodily fluids have necessarily evolved mechanisms to evade complement attack. Many organisms are known to co-opt host complement regulatory proteins (12), however, naturally occurring novel inhibitors which directly target complement components are being discovered at an increasing rate. In this review we will focus on a select group of recently discovered classical pathway (CP) specific inhibitors for which detailed mechanistic analysis have been performed (Table 1). These studies reveal a wide breadth of novel molecular strategies now known to specifically target and inactivate the CP.

Table 1
Novel Inhibitors of the Classical Complement Pathway

Complement Activation

Upon encountering foreign or damaged self-cells, complement pattern recognition proteins trigger a series of enzymatic events at the target surface. A central step in the cascade involves the cleavage of complement component C3 into the anaphylatoxin C3a and the opsonic C3b fragment which covalently attaches to the target surface and labels it for phagocytosis. The conversion of C3 is catalyzed by surface-assembled protease complexes termed C3 convertases (C4b2a and C3bBb). When high densities of C3b are deposited on the target surface, C3b molecules associate with the existing C3 convertases to form C5 convertase complexes (C4b3b2a and C3b2Bb) that exhibit substrate preference for cleavage of C5 (13). C5 proteolysis results in formation of C5b, which subsequently binds C6, C7, C8 and multiple copies of C9 to form the lytic MAC. In addition, C5a, the small soluble byproduct of C5 conversion, acts as a potent chemoattractant for phagocytic cells, particularly neutrophils (14).

While C3 and C5 can be cleaved by serine proteases of the coagulation system under certain circumstances (15, 16), prototypical complement activation is triggered by one of three pathways: i) the alternative pathway (AP), ii) the aforementioned CP and iii) the lectin pathway (LP), each of which differ by mode of initiation. The focus of this review remains on novel and direct inhibitory mechanisms of the CP. As such, a detailed description of the molecular events associated with CP activation is necessitated and provided in Fig. 1, while LP and AP activation are only briefly outlined here. The LP is initiated when patterns of sugar moieties on foreign cells are recognized by mannose-binding lectin (MBL) or ficolins, which are themselves non-covalently associated with MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs). These complexes catalyze C4 and C2 cleavage leading to C4b2a convertase formation (17). On the other hand, the AP C3 convertase, C3bBb, is formed when surface-attached C3b interacts with the protease factors B (fB) and D (fD) (18). In the absence of CP and LP, the AP depends on slow but continuous C3b deposition by soluble C3(H2O)Bb convertases that occur from interactions of fB and fD with spontaneously hydrolyzed C3 (‘tick-over’) (19). AP C3 convertases amplify C3 conversion on the target surface as C3b serves the scaffold for assembly of new C3bBb convertases.

Figure 1
Classical pathway activation and novel mechanisms of complement evasion molecules

Regulation of Complement by the Host

In order to prevent unwanted complement activation on host cells, convertase formation is tightly regulated via soluble and host plasma membrane-bound regulators of complement activation (RCAs). RCAs either act as a cofactor for factor-I-mediated C3b and C4b inactivation, or promote dissociation of convertases. An example of such a regulator is the plasmatic C4b-binding protein (C4BP) which destabilizes CP and LP convertases and is a cofactor for C4b degradation (20). Factor H (fH) serves an analogous AP regulatory function as it is a cofactor for factor I-mediated C3b degradation and possesses decay accelerating activity (21). CP activation is controlled at the level of C1 by C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), a serpin that directly inactivates C1 by covalently binding the catalytic site of both C1r and C1s and dissociating the inhibited C1r-C1s-(C1-INH)2 complex from C1q (22).

An additional layer of regulation occurs in the case of IgG-mediated CP activation. Due to its low affinity for solution phase monomeric IgG molecules, serum C1 remains inactive. IgG-mediated activation of C1 only occurs through clustering of surface-bound IgG where multivalent binding increases C1q-binding affinity (23). Recently, a study by Diebolder and colleagues led to new insights into the mechanism of IgG-mediated CP activation (24). This investigation showed that activation is affected by hexamerization of IgG on the target surface via Fc-Fc interactions and that hexameric IgG significantly increases C1q-binding and activation (24). While immune complexes represent the canonical target for CP activation, it is important to note that many complement-activating, antibody-independent C1q ligands are known, including specific bacterial surface proteins (25, 26).

General Mechanisms of Complement Evasion

Microorganisms use a wide range of general defense strategies to survive complement attack and this topic has been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere (2, 12, 27, 28). Select examples are presented here for the purposes of illustration. Recruitment of host RCAs to the microbial surface is by far the most common mode of complement evasion among bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites alike (2). One such example is Streptococcus pneumoniae, which binds factor H (fH) via its membrane-bound fH-binding inhibitor of complement (Hic) and hijacks the primary endogenous AP regulator in a functional state (29). Numerous other microbes, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Group A Streptococci, express analogous proteins which adsorb C4BP at the bacterial surface, thereby resulting in down regulation of both the CP and LP (27). Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori have been reported to transfer GPI-anchored CD59 to their membrane, a regulator that prevents C9 polymerization and MAC formation on many host cells (30, 31). In contrast, several viruses surround themselves with membrane-associated RCAs by budding from host membranes (32).

Rather than recruitment of host proteins, certain viruses express host regulator mimics which share sequence homology to the ‘complement control protein’ (CCP) modules that are the most prevalent domains of RCAs (33). Two prominent examples of this type of molecular mimicry are the vaccinia virus complement control protein (VCP) and the smallpox inhibitor of complement enzymes (SPICE) from variola virus. VCP and SPICE both contain four CCP domains and protect virally infected cells from CP and AP activity by serving as factor-I cofactors for C3b/C4b degradation in addition to possessing convertase decay accelerating activities (3436).

Cobra venom factor (CVF) is the prototypical example of a complement inhibitor that acts by activation and consumption of complement. CVF rapidly depletes C3 and C5 from a variety of mammalian sera via the formation of stable CVF-Bb convertases (37). Microbes have also evolved proteins capable of activation and depletion of complement. For example, a secreted form of the ubiquitously-expressed S. pneumoniae endopeptidase O (PepO) was shown to activate the CP by binding C1q and inducing depletion of fluid-phase complement (38). A related anti-complement strategy commonly employed by microbes is the proteolytic degradation of complement components by either bacterially-derived or recruited endogenous proteases. For instance, S. aureus produces staphylokinase (SAK), a protein that complexes with host plasminogen to convert it into the active serine protease plasmin (39, 40), while Pseudomonas aeruginosa degrades these components with specific bacterially-expressed enzymes (41, 42).

Finally, many complement evasion molecules which act by unique mechanisms have now been discovered. The most notable examples come from S. aureus, which produces a broad range of evasion proteins that interfere at multiple levels of the complement cascade. These include inhibitors of the C3 or C5 convertases (4346), molecules that bind C5 to prevent its conversion (47), and an antagonist of the C5a receptor on neutrophils (48). Such complement evasion proteins are among an arsenal of secreted factors used by S. aureus to manipulate and subvert both innate and adaptive human immunity (49).

Downregulation of the Classical Pathway via Antibody Targeting

The CP is distinguished from the LP and AP by its ability to be activated by immune complexes (i.e. antibody-antigen). In this regard, there are several evasion molecules that indirectly target the CP via antibody-directed mechanisms. S. aureus expresses two Ig-binding proteins; protein A (SpA) and staphylococcal binder of immunoglobulin (Sbi) (50, 51). SpA is a type I membrane protein that binds the Fc regions of IgG with high affinity and thereby blocks C1q-binding sites in these domains (52). Sbi, on the other hand, is a secreted protein that blocks CP activation by binding to Fc domains as well as stimulating the futile consumption of complement by binding directly to C3 (53). Other known IgG-targeting molecules include protein G, which is a cell wall-associated protein of Group C and G Streptococci that binds all subclasses of IgG via their Fc regions (54), and the Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gE and gI (32, 55, 56).

Novel Inhibitory Mechanisms of the Classical Pathway

Uniquely evolved AP inhibitors with direct modes of action have been known for over a decade and have been extensively reviewed before (2, 12, 5761). By contrast, relatively few examples of conceptually similar CP-specific inhibitors have been reported. In many ways this has been surprising given the far upstream position of CP activation within the cascade and its prominent role in recognizing and eliminating many types of pathogens. The myriad of theoretical intervention points at the level of C1 and/or the CP/LP convertase (Fig. 1) further supports the idea that various pathogens, parasites, and opportunists have evolved unique inhibitory molecules that disrupt function of the CP. Several recent studies have borne out these predictions and have revealed a striking level of diversity in CP-specific complement evasion strategies.

Disruption of the C1 Complex

The productive activation of C1 requires an orchestrated series of intermolecular recognition events coupled to the substrate specificity and catalytic activity of C1s (Fig. 1). While previously activated C1s can indeed cleave C4 and C2 in vitro, proteolysis is normally restricted to the context of C1, and there is no known role for C1r or C1s outside of the C1 complex. The importance of complex stability for C1 function is further evidenced by the secondary inhibitory mechanism of C1-INH, which rapidly dissociates two C1r-C1s-(C1-INH)2 complexes per C1 molecule, leaving C1q bound to the activating ligand (22). Recently, two unrelated families of complement evasion proteins have been identified which can bind directly to the collagenous stalk of C1q and disrupt its noncovalent association with the C1r2C1s2 heterotetramer. By interfering with the C1q/C1r2C1s2 interaction and inhibiting C1 proteolytic activities, these proteins employ a novel mechanism for specifically targeting and inhibiting the CP.

In 2008, Bonaparte and colleagues reported the first example of this type of CP inhibitor which was discovered in human astroviruses (HAstV), a nonenveloped, icosahedral RNA virus that causes infantile gastroenteritis (62). HAstV virions were shown to suppress CP, but not AP-dependent hemolytic complement activity, and to inhibit formation of the complement activation products C4d, iC3b, and C5b-9 complex under conditions selective for the CP (62). The inhibitory activity for type 1 virions was subsequently isolated to the viral coat protein (HAstV-1 Coat Protein). In a subsequent study, Hair et al. demonstrated the dose-dependent inhibition of C1s activation in the context of C1, as well as the displacement of C1r2C1s2 from the C1 complex by submicromolar concentrations of HAstV-1 Coat Protein (63). Interestingly, HAstV-1 Coat Protein was also shown to inhibit the LP and this inhibitory activity was linked to the ability of the viral protein to bind directly to MBL. HAstV-1 Coat Protein failed to interact with a site-directed MBL mutant, which is known to abolish the interaction of MASP-2 with MBL (64), and thus implicated an analogous protease displacement mechanism for HAstV-1 Coat Protein inhibition of the LP.

The C1q-binding site on the 787 amino acid HAstV-1 Coat Protein was mapped to a 30 amino acid stretch using its limited sequence homology to a known C1q ligand (human neutrophil defensin-1) (6567). In a very interesting finding, Sharp et al. noted that while a 15 amino acid peptide derivative was able to block CP activation it was unable to displace C1r2C1s2 from the C1 complex, unlike the in-tact HAstV-1 Coat Protein macromolecule (68). These observations strongly suggest that complete displacement of C1r2C1s2 is not required to inhibit C1, but rather that HAstV-1 Coat Protein likely exerts its inhibitory effect by disrupting the orientation of C1q relative to C1r2C1s2 within the C1 complex. These data may in part explain the inhibitory mechanism of a different novel CP/LP inhibitor, Trypanosmoma cruzi calreticulin (TcCRT), which also binds to the collagenous region of C1q (69, 70). While TcCRT prevented C1r2C1s2 from binding C1q, it failed to displace C1r2C1s2 in a preformed C1 complex and only blocked C1s cleavage of C4 in the context of C1 but not the isolated C1s enzyme (70). As with HAstV-1 Coat Protein, TcCRT was recently shown to also block LP activation (71). This observation further supports the concept of a partially overlapping mechanism by these otherwise distinct inhibitors.

C1q is a glycoprotein assembled from six copies of three non-identical, interwoven polypeptides (chains A, B, and C) (25). Within the C1 complex, C1r and C1s are arranged as a ring-shaped heterotetramer which is confined by an outer cage-like structure formed by the six collagenous C1q stems (72). Bacteria express a number of cell-surface proteins that are capable of binding to collagenous structures and many of them belong to a group termed microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules or MSCRAMMs (73). In 2013, Kang and Ko et al. reported that members of collagen-binding MSCRAMMs from a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria, including the S. aureus prototype adhesin called CNA, can bind directly to C1q and inhibit CP activation (74). A panel of structure-guided, site-directed CNA mutants which were previously shown to be deficient in collagen binding relative to wild-type CNA, impaired C1q/CNA binding in an identical manner (75). A single point mutation (CNA-Y175K) nearly abolished binding to both collagen and C1q and the relative affinity of this and other CNA mutants closely correlated to their ability to inhibit the CP in hemolytic and ELISA-based complement assays. CNA-like collagen-binding MSCRAMMs from four additional Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus equi, and Streptococcus mutans) also bound C1q and inhibited CP activation. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that C1r2C1s2 was completely displaced from C1q in the presence of 80 μM CNA but not CNA-Y175K, and similarly to HAstV-1 Coat Protein, CNA could interfere with the C1q/C1r2C1s2 interaction in an ELISA-based competition format. In contrast to HAstV-1 Coat Protein and TcCRT, which have no apparent effect on recognition of complement activating ligands, CNA (but not CNA-Y175K) interfered with C1 recognition of IgM-coated microtiter plates. Interestingly, this effect was specific for C1 as little to no competition was observed when isolated C1q was used. These data suggest that CNA may stabilize a conformation of C1q within the C1 complex that possesses lower affinity for immune complexes. Thus, by recognizing specific collagenous structures, CNA-like MSCRAMMs from Gram-positive bacteria act not only as adhesins, but are able to inhibit the CP by binding directly to C1q and disrupting the stability and ligand recognition properties of the C1 complex.

Inhibition of C1r Proteolytic Activity

C1q recognition is common to the complement inhibitory activities of HAstV-1 Coat Protein, TcCRT, and CNA-like MSCRAMMs, described above. Surprisingly, examples of specific, C1q-independent targeting and inactivation of C1r and C1s have been absent from the literature. Recently, Garcia et al. reported that the etiological agent of Lyme disease, B. burgdorferi, expresses a lipoprotein termed BBK32 that forms high-affinity, noncovalent complexes with purified C1 (KD,SPR = 3.9 nM) and exhibits half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 34 nM and 110 nM in CP-specific ELISA-based and hemolytic complement assays, respectively (76). When BBK32 was expressed in a normally serum-sensitive B. burgdorferi strain (B314), it conferred serum protection in complement killing assays and promoted bacterial attachment to immobilized C1. When isolated components of C1 were evaluated, high-affinity interaction was retained for C1r only (KD,SPR = 15 nM) whereas no detectable interaction was measured for C1q, C1s, or pro-C1s. In agreement with this observation, and the CP-specific function of C1r, BBK32 failed to inhibit the AP or LP at concentrations of BBK32 up to 1μM. The intrinsically disordered N-terminal region of BBK32 (residues 21–205) is known to participate in bacterial adherence by binding certain glycosaminoglycans (77) and fibronectin (78) via non-overlapping binding sites. In contrast, the C1/C1r binding activity and CP inhibitory activities were fully retained by the BBK32 C-terminal globular domain (BBK32-C, residues 206–354). A series of biochemical and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that in addition to preventing C1r cleavage of pro-C1s, BBK32 also prevented C1r auto-activation within the context of the C1 complex. Therefore, rather than disrupting the stability of the C1 complex as described for the C1q-binding inhibitors above, BBK32 instead traps C1 as a zymogen by preventing the initial proteolytic activation of C1.

Targeting the CP/LP C3 Proconvertase

Throughout the last several decades, the Gram-positive pathogen S. aureus has become a paradigm for understanding host/pathogen interactions and immune evasion. In the early stages of these developments some twenty years ago, McGavin et al. identified the so-called Extracellular Adherence Protein (Eap) as a secreted staphylococcal adhesin with the ability to bind several extracellular matrix glycoproteins (79). A large body of literature expanded upon this initial work, and described several surprising outcomes from the study of Eap’s effects on various physiological models in mice. In particular, Eap was reported to contain intrinsic anti-inflammatory activities that block leukocyte recruitment to tissues (8082), to impair various angiogenic responses (83), and to disrupt the overall process of wound healing (83). While Eap was recently described as an inhibitor of neutrophil serine proteases (84), a previously undiscovered link between Eap and the complement system has also been confirmed.

Taking advantage of a recombinant protein library that represents secreted S. aureus proteins, Woehl, Stapels, and coworkers used a biochemical screening approach to identify Eap as a dose-dependent inhibitor of the CP (85). Interestingly, Eap also inhibited activity of the LP to a similar extent, as judged by C3b deposition in a pathway-specific ELISA. The fact that Eap was able to potently block C3b deposition via the CP and LP, but had no effect on the activation of C4 to C4b suggested that Eap acted on either the fully-assembled C3 convertase shared by the CP and LP (i.e. C4b2a), or an isolated component of this proteolytic complex. While Eap binds directly to C4, C4b, and C4c with nanomolar affinity, its interaction with C4b (KD,Alpha=185 nM) appears to be paramount from a functional perspective. In this context, Eap binding to C4b results in dose-dependent inhibition of C4b binding to the pro-protease, C2. It remains to be determined whether Eap’s influence on C4b binding to C2 arises through steric or allosteric events, since the published data do not address this issue directly. Despite this limitation, it seems clear that the ultimate consequence of Eap interaction with C4b is inhibited formation of the CP/LP C3 proconvertase, which in turn hampers downstream formation of the active CP/LP C3 convertase. On balance, this mechanism presents numerous parallels to that of the S. aureus AP inhibitor, Efb-C, which instead blocks generation of the AP C3 proconvertase, C3bB (86).

Most natively occurring regulators of the complement system consist of tandem repeats of the CCP4 domain (33, 87), though as numerous studies with factor H have shown, not all of these repeats are required for binding to their complement targets or for manifestation of complement regulatory activities (88, 89). Eap shares a similarly modular architecture, as it consists of sequential ~110 residue repeating domains that are connected by short polypeptide linkers (90, 91). Although a gene encoding Eap is found in 98% of all S. aureus strains (92), it occurs in isoforms that vary between 4 and 6 domains (80, 84). While these isoforms appear largely equivalent in terms of their activity in functional assays, mechanistic investigations of Eap’s effects on the complement system have been carried out exclusively with the four domain isoform expressed by S. aureus strain Mu50 due to its tractable biophysical properties (85, 91). Deletion analyses of this Eap variant have established that a truncation consisting of domains 3 and 4 (i.e. Eap34) has similar C4b binding affinity (KD,Alpha=525 nM), interferes with C2 binding, and retains complement inhibitory properties comparable to full-length Eap (IC50,LP =227 nM). These results demonstrate that Eap is modular at both the structural and functional level, which is an attribute that appears to be common amongst complement regulators regardless of their origin.

A perplexing feature of many S. aureus immune evasion molecules is that obvious structural and/or functional homologs do not appear to exist in other organisms. However, a secreted protein from Group B Streptococcus was recently discovered which shares a remarkable level of functional and mechanistic similarity to Eap. Pietrocola et al. identified the gene COH1_1804 in a library of putative surface-retained antigens from S. agalactiae strain COH1 which lacked any further cell-surface retention motifs (93). A recombinant form of this ~15 kDa protein blocked C3b deposition by both the CP and LP in a dose-dependent manner, leading the authors to rename it CIP for Complement Interfering Protein. Further study demonstrated that CIP bound to C4 and C4b, with the latter complex exhibiting low-nanomolar affinity (KD,SPR=95nM). Similarly to S. aureus Eap, CIP binding to C4b interfered with formation of the C4b2 proconvertase complex, though it had no effect on formation of the AP C3 proconvertase, C3bB. Remarkably, while CIP and Eap both bind C4b and interfere with formation of the C4b2 proconvertase, it does not appear that these proteins represent true homologs of one another. Not only does CIP share very limited amino acid identity with Eap (15%) (93), structure prediction suggests that CIP adopts a thioredoxin-class fold that is significantly different from the tandemly repeating structural domains characteristic of Eap (91, 94). Thus, it seems more likely that CIP and Eap are a product of distinct evolutionary lineages that have selected for potent inhibitors of the CP and LP. Indeed, strategies that block the furthest upstream event shared by the CP and LP (i.e. formation of the C4b2 proconvertase) certainly meet this criterion.

Undefined Mechanisms of Classical Pathway Inhibition

In addition to the better characterized CP inhibitory mechanisms described above, a novel CP-specific inhibitory molecule has been discovered in the blood-feeding sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (10). Ferreira and colleagues identified LJM19 (renamed to salivary anti-complement from Lu. longipalpis or SALO) as the molecule responsible for the complement inhibitory activity in sand fly salivary gland homogenates (SGH). Recombinant SALO was a potent inhibitor in CP hemolytic assays (IC50 ≈ 100 nM), while two paralogous proteins LJS169 and LJS192 were devoid of inhibitory activity. Moreover, antibodies raised against recombinant SALO were able to reverse CP inhibition by SGH. SALO inhibition was CP-specific as concentrations up to 2 μM exhibited no effect in AP or LP assays. However, SALO did not directly block the activity of isolated C1s in C4 cleavage assays and did not interfere with C1q binding to immobilized IgG. Hence, while the specificity for CP inhibition remains clear, the complement target and mechanism of CP inactivation is currently not well defined for this novel inhibitor.

Perspectives

All immune evasion molecules discussed here (Table 1) are capable of specifically targeting and inhibiting the CP. However, distinctions can be made amongst the C1q-binding inhibitors like PepO, CNA-like MSCRAMMs, and HAstV-1 Coat Protein, which may potentially exploit the well-recognized complement-independent functions of C1q (95, 96). For instance, S. pneumoniae (97) and Bacillus anthracis (98) have both been shown to facilitate C1q-dependent adherence and host cell invasion. It is therefore interesting to speculate on the potential role of C1q-binding CP inhibitors on non-complement related functions of C1q, especially in cases where displacement of C1r2C1s2 from C1q occurs. In the same light, consideration should be given to the modular and multi-functional nature of many of the CP-specific inhibitors presented here. The relevance of other host protein binding activities of inhibitors like BBK32 (e.g. fibronectin-binding) has yet to be evaluated, however, a functional synergism may in fact exist. Indeed a synergistic function involving a component of the coagulation system and complement has already been shown for the S. aureus AP-inhibitor Efb which bridges fibrinogen and C3b and promotes bacterial survival through a sophisticated immune shielding mechanism (99).

In addition to blocking the CP, several inhibitors presented here have also been shown to prevent activation of complement by the LP. In the case of the C4b-binding proteins Eap and CIP this dual-inhibitory property can be attributed to the intersection of these two pathways at the level of the C3 proconvertase, C4b2. In contrast, HAstV-1 Coat Protein and TcCRT bind the collagenous stalk of C1q and a similar collagen-like structure is present in the LP pattern recognition molecules MBL/ficolins (100). As this site also harbors the cognate protease binding sites (i.e. MASP-1/-2), HAstV-1 Coat Protein and TcCRT are able to effectively inhibit both pathways. Although CNA-like MSCRAMMs also disrupt C1r2C1s2 by binding the C1q collagen stem, it is currently unknown if these proteins are capable of binding LP pattern recognition molecules. TcCRT, which blocks ficolin-initiated but not MBL-initiated LP activation, suggests that specificity for individual pattern recognition molecules can exist, akin to what has been previously observed for the associated host proteases (101, 102). Interestingly, to date there are few known inhibitors of the LP that do not also block CP activation. The discovery of molecules such as BBK32 and SALO which act exclusively on the CP, the existence of LP-specific synthetic inhibitors (103), and the more ancient evolutionary relationship of the LP to the CP (104) make it particularly likely that future studies will serve to uncover novel inhibitors specific for the LP that originate from natural sources.

The conserved sequence and structural relationships of CNA-like MSCRAMMs led to the discovery of a broad new class of CP-specific inhibitors found in many Gram-positive bacteria. Surprisingly, this type of structure-function convergence appears to be the exception rather than the rule for complement evasion molecules. As has been noted for the S. aureus AP complement inhibitors (e.g. SCINs, Efb, and Sbi), molecules such as BBK32, Eap, and SALO have no obvious sequence correspondence to genes outside of their respective genera. However, it appears several structurally divergent complement evasion molecules have evolved to share common complement inhibitory mechanisms. This concept is illustrated by the apparent lack of sequence/structure relationships between the CP/LP procovertase-targeting inhibitors (Eap/CIP) and is further supported by the otherwise unrelated C1 disrupting proteins (CNA-like MSCRAMMs/HAstV-1 Coat Protein/TcCRT). Although the inhibitory mechanisms of complement evasion are clearly constrained by the structure and function of their cognate complement targets (i.e. C1, convertases, etc.), the structure of functionally related complement inhibitors is seemingly much less restricted. This observation strongly suggests that future efforts aimed at discovering novel complement evasion molecules will require empirically-driven approaches rather than sequence informatics or other candidate-based methodologies.

Despite its protective role, the dysregulation of complement is a hallmark of many autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions including ischemia/reperfusion injury, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, age-related macular degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis, antibody-mediated transplant rejection, and cancer (105, 106). Considerable need exists for the pharmacological treatment of complement-related diseases, and the development of novel complement-directed therapeutics has gained significant momentum over the past decade (106108). The involvement of excessive CP activation in human disease has been recently cast into the spotlight due to its causal link to schizophrenia (109) and Alzheimer’s disease (110), not to mention other devastating diseases where the contribution of the CP to pathology has been longer appreciated (111, 112). At a minimum, the naturally occurring inhibitors discussed here represent promising conceptual and/or mechanistic templates for the development of evolutionarily-optimized, CP-specific inhibitors. While issues related to immunogenicity likely prevents their direct use for therapeutic intervention, the true utility of these naturally occurring inhibitors may not be fully realized until drug-like compounds which mimic their properties can be engineered.

The appearance of low molecular weight complement inhibitors, such as Compstatin (113, 114), has challenged the notion that the large protein-protein interfaces upon which the complement cascade is predicated cannot be targeted by much smaller drug-like compounds. To this point, small peptide mimics of S. aureus SCIN-derived AP inhibitors have been reported (115), and a peptidic derivative of HAstV-1 Coat Protein (PIC1) has shown efficacy as complement inhibitor in in vivo (68, 116). The ability of SCIN-derived peptides and PIC1 to preserve the inhibitory activities present in full-length proteins is consistent with the idea that immune evasion molecules, which often appear to target relatively small functional “hot-spots” on their host targets, hold promise as templates for drug design. However, unlike the more recently discovered CP-specific inhibitors reviewed here, S. aureus AP evasion proteins and Compstatin have benefited from an abundance of detailed structural studies which have primed them for therapeutic development (43, 86, 115, 117122). Obtaining a detailed understanding of the structural basis for CP-specific inhibitors will be a critical step forward in tapping their potential for treatment of complement-related diseases. In this regard, the availability of published high-resolution crystal structures for nearly all CP complement components (72, 123128) including a detailed structural model of the C1 complex (72) stands to significantly bolster these efforts in the years ahead.

Conclusions

Organisms whose life-cycle involves direct contact with blood, lymph, and related bodily fluids must develop protective mechanisms to evade complement. Here we have reviewed a set of recent investigations that have identified direct inhibitors of the CP and revealed a fascinating level of diversity in modes of CP-specific inhibition (Fig. 1). Each of these proteins interferes with the activity of the initiating protease complex of the CP, C1, or acts at the level of the CP/LP convertase. As research continues to grow in this area it seems likely that additional CP-specific evasion mechanisms will be discovered. Indeed, preliminary disclosures of naturally-occurring leech-derived peptide inhibitors of C1s activity (patent publication numbers: CA2318358 A1 and WO2001098365 A2) and the development of a potent anti-C1s monoclonal antibody (TNT003) (129, 130), suggest that C1s can be successfully targeted by diverse molecules. Finally, the discovery of molecules like SALO and TcCRT has highlighted an emerging field of evasion molecules derived from parasites and opportunists (e.g. blood feeders). While great effort has been already expended on discovering evasion molecules from bacterial pathogens, the study of hematophagous organisms represents a seemingly understudied yet important frontier in complement research. Increased attention in the areas of vector borne disease makes it extremely likely that novel complement regulators will be discovered in the near future from either these vectors or the pathogens they transmit.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants from the US National Institutes of Health (AI111203 and AI113552) to B.V.G. and Grants from the Netherlands Scientific Organization (NWO-Vidi 91711379) and European Research Council (ERC Starting grant 639209-ComBact) to S.H.M.R.

References

1. Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1058–1066. [PubMed]
2. Lambris JD, Ricklin D, Geisbrecht BV. Complement evasion by human pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:132–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Barros VC, Assumpcao JG, Cadete AM, Santos VC, Cavalcante RR, Araujo RN, Pereira MH, Gontijo NF. The role of salivary and intestinal complement system inhibitors in the midgut protection of triatomines and mosquitoes. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6047. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Schuijt TJ, Coumou J, Narasimhan S, Dai J, Deponte K, Wouters D, Brouwer M, Oei A, Roelofs JJ, van Dam AP, van der Poll T, Van’t Veer C, Hovius JW, Fikrig E. A tick mannose-binding lectin inhibitor interferes with the vertebrate complement cascade to enhance transmission of the lyme disease agent. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:136–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Hourcade DE, Akk AM, Mitchell LM, Zhou HF, Hauhart R, Pham CT. Anti-complement activity of the Ixodes scapularis salivary protein Salp20. Mol Immunol. 2016;69:62–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Franco PF, Silva NC, Fazito do Vale V, Abreu JF, Santos VC, Gontijo NF, Valenzuela JG, Pereira MH, Sant’Anna MR, Gomes AP, Araujo RN. Inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement system by saliva of Amblyomma cajennense (Acari: Ixodidae) Exp Parasitol. 2016;164:91–96. [PubMed]
7. Wagemakers A, Coumou J, Schuijt TJ, Oei A, Nijhof AM, van ‘t Veer C, van der Poll T, Bins AD, Hovius JW. An Ixodes ricinus Tick Salivary Lectin Pathway Inhibitor Protects Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from Human Complement. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16:223–228. [PubMed]
8. Mika A, Reynolds SL, Mohlin FC, Willis C, Swe PM, Pickering DA, Halilovic V, Wijeyewickrema LC, Pike RN, Blom AM, Kemp DJ, Fischer K. Novel scabies mite serpins inhibit the three pathways of the human complement system. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40489. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Ooi CP, Haines LR, Southern DM, Lehane MJ, Acosta-Serrano A. Tsetse GmmSRPN10 has anti-complement activity and is important for successful establishment of trypanosome infections in the fly midgut. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e3448. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Ferreira VP, Fazito Vale V, Pangburn MK, Abdeladhim M, Ferreira Mendes-Sousa A, Coutinho-Abreu IV, Rasouli M, Brandt EA, Meneses C, Lima KF, Nascimento Araujo R, Horacio Pereira M, Kotsyfakis M, Oliveira F, Kamhawi S, Ribeiro JM, Gontijo NF, Collin N, Valenzuela JG. SALO, a novel classical pathway complement inhibitor from saliva of the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19300. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Cavalcante RR, Pereira MH, Gontijo NF. Anti-complement activity in the saliva of phlebotomine sand flies and other haematophagous insects. Parasitology. 2003;127:87–93. [PubMed]
12. Blom AM, Hallstrom T, Riesbeck K. Complement evasion strategies of pathogens-acquisition of inhibitors and beyond. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2808–2817. [PubMed]
13. Joiner KA, Brown EJ, Frank MM. Complement and bacteria: chemistry and biology in host defense. Annu Rev Immunol. 1984;2:461–491. [PubMed]
14. Haas PJ, van Strijp J. Anaphylatoxins: their role in bacterial infection and inflammation. Immunol Res. 2007;37:161–175. [PubMed]
15. Huber-Lang M, Sarma JV, Zetoune FS, Rittirsch D, Neff TA, McGuire SR, Lambris JD, Warner RL, Flierl MA, Hoesel LM, Gebhard F, Younger JG, Drouin SM, Wetsel RA, Ward PA. Generation of C5a in the absence of C3: a new complement activation pathway. Nat Med. 2006;12:682–687. [PubMed]
16. Amara U, Flierl MA, Rittirsch D, Klos A, Chen H, Acker B, Bruckner UB, Nilsson B, Gebhard F, Lambris JD, Huber-Lang M. Molecular intercommunication between the complement and coagulation systems. J Immunol. 2010;185:5628–5636. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Wallis R. Interactions between mannose-binding lectin and MASPs during complement activation by the lectin pathway. Immunobiology. 2007;212:289–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Bexborn F, Andersson PO, Chen H, Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN. The tick-over theory revisited: formation and regulation of the soluble alternative complement C3 convertase (C3(H2O)Bb) Mol Immunol. 2008;45:2370–2379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Pangburn MK, Muller-Eberhard HJ. Initiation of the alternative complement pathway due to spontaneous hydrolysis of the thioester of C3. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;421:291–298. [PubMed]
20. Rawal N, Rajagopalan R, Salvi VP. Stringent regulation of complement lectin pathway C3/C5 convertase by C4b-binding protein (C4BP) Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2902–2910. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Ferreira VP, Pangburn MK, Cortes C. Complement control protein factor H: the good, the bad, and the inadequate. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:2187–2197. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Ziccardi RJ. The first component of human complement (C1): activation and control. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1983;6:213–230. [PubMed]
23. Burton DR. Immunoglobulin G: functional sites. Mol Immunol. 1985;22:161–206. [PubMed]
24. Diebolder CA, Beurskens FJ, de Jong RN, Koning RI, Strumane K, Lindorfer MA, Voorhorst M, Ugurlar D, Rosati S, Heck AJ, van de Winkel JG, Wilson IA, Koster AJ, Taylor RP, Saphire EO, Burton DR, Schuurman J, Gros P, Parren PW. Complement is activated by IgG hexamers assembled at the cell surface. Science. 2014;343:1260–1263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Gaboriaud C, Frachet P, Thielens NM, Arlaud GJ. The human c1q globular domain: structure and recognition of non-immune self ligands. Front Immunol. 2012;2:92. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Agarwal V, Blom AM. Roles of Complement C1q in Pneumococcus-Host Interactions. Crit Rev Immunol. 2015;35:173–184. [PubMed]
27. Rooijakkers SH, van Strijp JA. Bacterial complement evasion. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:23–32. [PubMed]
28. Serruto D, Rappuoli R, Scarselli M, Gros P, van Strijp JA. Molecular mechanisms of complement evasion: learning from staphylococci and meningococci. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:393–399. [PubMed]
29. Janulczyk R, Iannelli F, Sjoholm AG, Pozzi G, Bjorck L. Hic, a novel surface protein of Streptococcus pneumoniae that interferes with complement function. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:37257–37263. [PubMed]
30. Ehrnthaller C, Ignatius A, Gebhard F, Huber-Lang M. New insights of an old defense system: structure, function, and clinical relevance of the complement system. Mol Med. 2011;17:317–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Rautemaa R, Rautelin H, Puolakkainen P, Kokkola A, Karkkainen P, Meri S. Survival of Helicobacter pylori From complement lysis by binding of GPI-anchored protectin (CD59) Gastroenterology. 2001;120:470–479. [PubMed]
32. Favoreel HW, Van de Walle GR, Nauwynck HJ, Pensaert MB. Virus complement evasion strategies. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:1–15. [PubMed]
33. Kirkitadze MD, Barlow PN. Structure and flexibility of the multiple domain proteins that regulate complement activation. Immunol Rev. 2001;180:146–161. [PubMed]
34. Kotwal GJ, Moss B. Vaccinia virus encodes a secretory polypeptide structurally related to complement control proteins. Nature. 1988;335:176–178. [PubMed]
35. McKenzie R, Kotwal GJ, Moss B, Hammer CH, Frank MM. Regulation of complement activity by vaccinia virus complement-control protein. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:1245–1250. [PubMed]
36. Rosengard AM, Liu Y, Nie Z, Jimenez R. Variola virus immune evasion design: expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8808–8813. [PubMed]
37. Muller-Eberhard HJ, Fjellstrom KE. Isolation of the anticomplementary protein from cobra venom and its mode of action on C3. J Immunol. 1971;107:1666–1672. [PubMed]
38. Agarwal V, Sroka M, Fulde M, Bergmann S, Riesbeck K, Blom AM. Binding of Streptococcus pneumoniae endopeptidase O (PepO) to complement component C1q modulates the complement attack and promotes host cell adherence. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:15833–15844. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Rooijakkers SH, van Wamel WJ, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Anti-opsonic properties of staphylokinase. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:476–484. [PubMed]
40. Molkanen T, Tyynela J, Helin J, Kalkkinen N, Kuusela P. Enhanced activation of bound plasminogen on Staphylococcus aureus by staphylokinase. FEBS Lett. 2002;517:72–78. [PubMed]
41. Hong YQ, Ghebrehiwet B. Effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase and alkaline protease on serum complement and isolated components C1q and C3. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1992;62:133–138. [PubMed]
42. Laarman AJ, Bardoel BW, Ruyken M, Fernie J, Milder FJ, van Strijp JA, Rooijakkers SH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa alkaline protease blocks complement activation via the classical and lectin pathways. J Immunol. 2012;188:386–393. [PubMed]
43. Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, Roos A, Daha MR, Presanis JS, Sim RB, van Wamel WJ, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:920–927. [PubMed]
44. Lee LY, Hook M, Haviland D, Wetsel RA, Yonter EO, Syribeys P, Vernachio J, Brown EL. Inhibition of complement activation by a secreted Staphylococcus aureus protein. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:571–579. [PubMed]
45. Jongerius I, Garcia BL, Geisbrecht BV, van Strijp JA, Rooijakkers SH. Convertase inhibitory properties of Staphylococcal extracellular complement-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:14973–14979. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Jongerius I, Kohl J, Pandey MK, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA, Rooijakkers SH. Staphylococcal complement evasion by various convertase-blocking molecules. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2461–2471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Langley R, Wines B, Willoughby N, Basu I, Proft T, Fraser JD. The staphylococcal superantigen-like protein 7 binds IgA and complement C5 and inhibits IgA-Fc alpha RI binding and serum killing of bacteria. J Immunol. 2005;174:2926–2933. [PubMed]
48. de Haas CJ, Veldkamp KE, Peschel A, Weerkamp F, Van Wamel WJ, Heezius EC, Poppelier MJ, Van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterial antiinflammatory agent. J Exp Med. 2004;199:687–695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Thammavongsa V, Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:529–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Forsgren A, Sjoquist J. “Protein A” from S. aureus. I. Pseudo-immune reaction with human gamma-globulin. J Immunol. 1966;97:822–827. [PubMed]
51. Zhang L, Jacobsson K, Vasi J, Lindberg M, Frykberg L. A second IgG-binding protein in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology. 1998;144(Pt 4):985–991. [PubMed]
52. Silverman GJ, Goodyear CS, Siegel DL. On the mechanism of staphylococcal protein A immunomodulation. Transfusion. 2005;45:274–280. [PubMed]
53. Smith EJ, Visai L, Kerrigan SW, Speziale P, Foster TJ. The Sbi protein is a multifunctional immune evasion factor of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3801–3809. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Bjorck L, Kronvall G. Purification and some properties of streptococcal protein G, a novel IgG-binding reagent. J Immunol. 1984;133:969–974. [PubMed]
55. Lubinski J, Nagashunmugam T, Friedman HM. Viral interference with antibody and complement. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998;9:329–337. [PubMed]
56. Lubinski JM, Lazear HM, Awasthi S, Wang F, Friedman HM. The herpes simplex virus 1 IgG fc receptor blocks antibody-mediated complement activation and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vivo. J Virol. 2011;85:3239–3249. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Garcia BL, Ramyar KX, Ricklin D, Lambris JD, Geisbrecht BV. Advances in understanding the structure, function, and mechanism of the SCIN and Efb families of Staphylococcal immune evasion proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:113–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Laarman A, Milder F, van Strijp J, Rooijakkers S. Complement inhibition by gram-positive pathogens: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Mol Med (Berl) 2010;88:115–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Zipfel PF, Skerka C. Complement regulators and inhibitory proteins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:729–740. [PubMed]
60. Zipfel PF, Skerka C. Staphylococcus aureus: the multi headed hydra resists and controls human complement response in multiple ways. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304:188–194. [PubMed]
61. Zipfel PF, Hallstrom T, Riesbeck K. Human complement control and complement evasion by pathogenic microbes--tipping the balance. Mol Immunol. 2013;56:152–160. [PubMed]
62. Bonaparte RS, Hair PS, Banthia D, Marshall DM, Cunnion KM, Krishna NK. Human astrovirus coat protein inhibits serum complement activation via C1, the first component of the classical pathway. J Virol. 2008;82:817–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Hair PS, Gronemus JQ, Crawford KB, Salvi VP, Cunnion KM, Thielens NM, Arlaud GJ, Rawal N, Krishna NK. Human astrovirus coat protein binds C1q and MBL and inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of complement activation. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:792–798. [PubMed]
64. Teillet F, Lacroix M, Thiel S, Weilguny D, Agger T, Arlaud GJ, Thielens NM. Identification of the site of human mannan-binding lectin involved in the interaction with its partner serine proteases: the essential role of Lys55. J Immunol. 2007;178:5710–5716. [PubMed]
65. Groeneveld TW, Ramwadhdoebe TH, Trouw LA, van den Ham DL, van der Borden V, Drijfhout JW, Hiemstra PS, Daha MR, Roos A. Human neutrophil peptide-1 inhibits both the classical and the lectin pathway of complement activation. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:3608–3614. [PubMed]
66. van den Berg RH, Faber-Krol MC, van Wetering S, Hiemstra PS, Daha MR. Inhibition of activation of the classical pathway of complement by human neutrophil defensins. Blood. 1998;92:3898–3903. [PubMed]
67. Gronemus JQ, Hair PS, Crawford KB, Nyalwidhe JO, Cunnion KM, Krishna NK. Potent inhibition of the classical pathway of complement by a novel C1q-binding peptide derived from the human astrovirus coat protein. Mol Immunol. 2010;48:305–313. [PubMed]
68. Sharp JA, Hair PS, Pallera HK, Kumar PS, Mauriello CT, Nyalwidhe JO, Phelps CA, Park D, Thielens NM, Pascal SM, Chen W, Duffy DM, Lattanzio FA, Cunnion KM, Krishna NK. Peptide Inhibitor of Complement C1 (PIC1) Rapidly Inhibits Complement Activation after Intravascular Injection in Rats. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Ferreira V, Valck C, Sanchez G, Gingras A, Tzima S, Molina MC, Sim R, Schwaeble W, Ferreira A. The classical activation pathway of the human complement system is specifically inhibited by calreticulin from Trypanosoma cruzi. J Immunol. 2004;172:3042–3050. [PubMed]
70. Valck C, Ramirez G, Lopez N, Ribeiro CH, Maldonado I, Sanchez G, Ferreira VP, Schwaeble W, Ferreira A. Molecular mechanisms involved in the inactivation of the first component of human complement by Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:1516–1521. [PubMed]
71. Sosoniuk E, Vallejos G, Kenawy H, Gaboriaud C, Thielens N, Fujita T, Schwaeble W, Ferreira A, Valck C. Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin inhibits the complement lectin pathway activation by direct interaction with L-Ficolin. Mol Immunol. 2014;60:80–85. [PubMed]
72. Venkatraman Girija U, Gingras AR, Marshall JE, Panchal R, Sheikh MA, Gal P, Schwaeble WJ, Mitchell DA, Moody PC, Wallis R. Structural basis of the C1q/C1s interaction and its central role in assembly of the C1 complex of complement activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13916–13920. [PubMed]
73. Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Hook M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:49–62. [PubMed]
74. Kang M, Ko YP, Liang X, Ross CL, Liu Q, Murray BE, Hook M. Collagen-binding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecule (MSCRAMM) of Gram-positive bacteria inhibit complement activation via the classical pathway. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:20520–20531. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Ross CL, Liang X, Liu Q, Murray BE, Hook M, Ganesh VK. Targeted protein engineering provides insights into binding mechanism and affinities of bacterial collagen adhesins. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:34856–34865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Garcia BL, Zhi H, Wager B, Hook M, Skare JT. Borrelia burgdorferi BBK32 Inhibits the Classical Pathway by Blocking Activation of the C1 Complement Complex. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005404. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Fischer JR, LeBlanc KT, Leong JM. Fibronectin binding protein BBK32 of the Lyme disease spirochete promotes bacterial attachment to glycosaminoglycans. Infect Immun. 2006;74:435–441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Probert WS, Johnson BJ. Identification of a 47 kDa fibronectin-binding protein expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi isolate B31. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:1003–1015. [PubMed]
79. McGavin MH, Krajewska-Pietrasik D, Ryden C, Hook M. Identification of a Staphylococcus aureus extracellular matrix-binding protein with broad specificity. Infect Immun. 1993;61:2479–2485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
80. Xie C, Alcaide P, Geisbrecht BV, Schneider D, Herrmann M, Preissner KT, Luscinskas FW, Chavakis T. Suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by extracellular adherence protein of Staphylococcus aureus. J Exp Med. 2006;203:985–994. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Chavakis T, Hussain M, Kanse SM, Peters G, Bretzel RG, Flock JI, Herrmann M, Preissner KT. Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein serves as anti-inflammatory factor by inhibiting the recruitment of host leukocytes. Nat Med. 2002;8:687–693. [PubMed]
82. Lee LY, Miyamoto YJ, McIntyre BW, Hook M, McCrea KW, McDevitt D, Brown EL. The Staphylococcus aureus Map protein is an immunomodulator that interferes with T cell-mediated responses. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1461–1471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Athanasopoulos AN, Economopoulou M, Orlova VV, Sobke A, Schneider D, Weber H, Augustin HG, Eming SA, Schubert U, Linn T, Nawroth PP, Hussain M, Hammes HP, Herrmann M, Preissner KT, Chavakis T. The extracellular adherence protein (Eap) of Staphylococcus aureus inhibits wound healing by interfering with host defense and repair mechanisms. Blood. 2006;107:2720–2727. [PubMed]
84. Stapels DA, Ramyar KX, Bischoff M, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Milder FJ, Ruyken M, Eisenbeis J, McWhorter WJ, Herrmann M, van Kessel KP, Geisbrecht BV, Rooijakkers SH. Staphylococcus aureus secretes a unique class of neutrophil serine protease inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:13187–13192. [PubMed]
85. Woehl JL, Stapels DA, Garcia BL, Ramyar KX, Keightley A, Ruyken M, Syriga M, Sfyroera G, Weber AB, Zolkiewski M, Ricklin D, Lambris JD, Rooijakkers SH, Geisbrecht BV. The extracellular adherence protein from Staphylococcus aureus inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of complement by blocking formation of the C3 proconvertase. J Immunol. 2014;193:6161–6171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Chen H, Ricklin D, Hammel M, Garcia BL, McWhorter WJ, Sfyroera G, Wu YQ, Tzekou A, Li S, Geisbrecht BV, Woods VL, Jr, Lambris JD. Allosteric inhibition of complement function by a staphylococcal immune evasion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:17621–17626. [PubMed]
87. Soares DC, Barlow PN. Complement control protein modules in the regulators of complement activation. In: Lambris JD, Morikis D, editors. Structural biology of the complement system. Taylor & Francis; Boca Raton: 2005. pp. 19–62.
88. Gordon DL, Kaufman RM, Blackmore TK, Kwong J, Lublin DM. Identification of complement regulatory domains in human factor H. J Immunol. 1995;155:348–356. [PubMed]
89. Schmidt CQ, Herbert AP, Kavanagh D, Gandy C, Fenton CJ, Blaum BS, Lyon M, Uhrin D, Barlow PN. A new map of glycosaminoglycan and C3b binding sites on factor H. J Immunol. 2008;181:2610–2619. [PubMed]
90. Geisbrecht BV, Hamaoka BY, Perman B, Zemla A, Leahy DJ. The crystal structures of EAP domains from Staphylococcus aureus reveal an unexpected homology to bacterial superantigens. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17243–17250. [PubMed]
91. Hammel M, Nemecek D, Keightley JA, Thomas GJ, Jr, Geisbrecht BV. The Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein (Eap) adopts an elongated but structured conformation in solution. Protein Sci. 2007;16:2605–2617. [PubMed]
92. Hussain M, Becker K, von Eiff C, Peters G, Herrmann M. Analogs of Eap protein are conserved and prevalent in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:1271–1276. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Pietrocola G, Rindi S, Rosini R, Buccato S, Speziale P, Margarit I. The Group B Streptococcus-Secreted Protein CIP Interacts with C4, Preventing C3b Deposition via the Lectin and Classical Complement Pathways. J Immunol. 2016;196:385–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Geisbrecht BV, Bouyain S, Pop M. An optimized system for expression and purification of secreted bacterial proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 2006;46:23–32. [PubMed]
95. Kouser L, Madhukaran SP, Shastri A, Saraon A, Ferluga J, Al-Mozaini M, Kishore U. Emerging and Novel Functions of Complement Protein C1q. Front Immunol. 2015;6:317. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
96. Colonna L, Parry GC, Panicker S, Elkon KB. Uncoupling complement C1s activation from C1q binding in apoptotic cell phagocytosis and immunosuppressive capacity. Clin Immunol. 2016;163:84–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
97. Agarwal V, Ahl J, Riesbeck K, Blom AM. An alternative role of C1q in bacterial infections: facilitating Streptococcus pneumoniae adherence and invasion of host cells. J Immunol. 2013;191:4235–4245. [PubMed]
98. Xue Q, Gu C, Rivera J, Hook M, Chen X, Pozzi A, Xu Y. Entry of Bacillus anthracis spores into epithelial cells is mediated by the spore surface protein BclA, integrin alpha2beta1 and complement component C1q. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:620–634. [PubMed]
99. Ko YP, Kuipers A, Freitag CM, Jongerius I, Medina E, van Rooijen WJ, Spaan AN, van Kessel KP, Hook M, Rooijakkers SH. Phagocytosis escape by a Staphylococcus aureus protein that connects complement and coagulation proteins at the bacterial surface. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
100. Merle NS, Church SE, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Complement System Part I - Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Front Immunol. 2015;6:262. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
101. Wallis R, Mitchell DA, Schmid R, Schwaeble WJ, Keeble AH. Paths reunited: Initiation of the classical and lectin pathways of complement activation. Immunobiology. 2010;215:1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Phillips AE, Toth J, Dodds AW, Girija UV, Furze CM, Pala E, Sim RB, Reid KB, Schwaeble WJ, Schmid R, Keeble AH, Wallis R. Analogous interactions in initiating complexes of the classical and lectin pathways of complement. J Immunol. 2009;182:7708–7717. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
103. Kocsis A, Kekesi KA, Szasz R, Vegh BM, Balczer J, Dobo J, Zavodszky P, Gal P, Pal G. Selective inhibition of the lectin pathway of complement with phage display selected peptides against mannose-binding lectin-associated serine protease (MASP)-1 and -2: significant contribution of MASP-1 to lectin pathway activation. J Immunol. 2010;185:4169–4178. [PubMed]
104. Matsushita M, Matsushita A, Endo Y, Nakata M, Kojima N, Mizuochi T, Fujita T. Origin of the classical complement pathway: Lamprey orthologue of mammalian C1q acts as a lectin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10127–10131. [PubMed]
105. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: pathophysiological mechanisms. J Immunol. 2013;190:3831–3838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
106. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Progress and trends in complement therapeutics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;735:1–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
107. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1265–1275. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
108. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: therapeutic interventions. J Immunol. 2013;190:3839–3847. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
109. Sekar A, Bialas AR, de Rivera H, Davis A, Hammond TR, Kamitaki N, Tooley K, Presumey J, Baum M, Van Doren V, Genovese G, Rose SA, Handsaker RE, Daly MJ, Carroll MC, Stevens B, McCarroll SA. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature. 2016;530:177–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S, Merry KM, Shi Q, Rosenthal A, Barres BA, Lemere CA, Selkoe DJ, Stevens B. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science 2016 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
111. Wouters D, Zeerleder S. Complement inhibitors to treat IgM-mediated autoimmune hemolysis. Haematologica. 2015;100:1388–1395. [PubMed]
112. Lintner KE, Wu YL, Yang Y, Spencer CH, Hauptmann G, Hebert LA, Atkinson JP, Yu CY. Early Components of the Complement Classical Activation Pathway in Human Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol. 2016;7:36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
113. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Compstatin: a complement inhibitor on its way to clinical application. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;632:273–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
114. Thurman JM. New anti-complement drugs: not so far away. Blood. 2014;123:1975–1976. [PubMed]
115. Garcia BL, Summers BJ, Ramyar KX, Tzekou A, Lin Z, Ricklin D, Lambris JD, Laity JH, Geisbrecht BV. A structurally dynamic N-terminal helix is a key functional determinant in staphylococcal complement inhibitor (SCIN) proteins. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:2870–2881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Sharp JA, Whitley PH, Cunnion KM, Krishna NK. Peptide inhibitor of complement c1, a novel suppressor of classical pathway activation: mechanistic studies and clinical potential. Front Immunol. 2014;5:406. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
117. Hammel M, Sfyroera G, Ricklin D, Magotti P, Lambris JD, Geisbrecht BV. A structural basis for complement inhibition by Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:430–437. [PubMed]
118. Chen H, Schuster MC, Sfyroera G, Geisbrecht BV, Lambris JD. Solution insights into the structure of the Efb/C3 complement inhibitory complex as revealed by lysine acetylation and mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008;19:55–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
119. Garcia BL, Summers BJ, Lin Z, Ramyar KX, Ricklin D, Kamath DV, Fu ZQ, Lambris JD, Geisbrecht BV. Diversity in the C3b [corrected] contact residues and tertiary structures of the staphylococcal complement inhibitor (SCIN) protein family. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:628–640. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
120. Garcia BL, Ramyar KX, Tzekou A, Ricklin D, McWhorter WJ, Lambris JD, Geisbrecht BV. Molecular basis for complement recognition and inhibition determined by crystallographic studies of the staphylococcal complement inhibitor (SCIN) bound to C3c and C3b. J Mol Biol. 2010;402:17–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
121. Rooijakkers SH, Milder FJ, Bardoel BW, Ruyken M, van Strijp JA, Gros P. Staphylococcal complement inhibitor: structure and active sites. J Immunol. 2007;179:2989–2998. [PubMed]
122. Rooijakkers SH, Wu J, Ruyken M, van Domselaar R, Planken KL, Tzekou A, Ricklin D, Lambris JD, Janssen BJ, van Strijp JA, Gros P. Structural and functional implications of the alternative complement pathway C3 convertase stabilized by a staphylococcal inhibitor. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:721–727. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
123. Perry AJ, Wijeyewickrema LC, Wilmann PG, Gunzburg MJ, D’Andrea L, Irving JA, Pang SS, Duncan RC, Wilce JA, Whisstock JC, Pike RN. A molecular switch governs the interaction between the human complement protease C1s and its substrate, complement C4. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:15821–15829. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
124. Kidmose RT, Laursen NS, Dobo J, Kjaer TR, Sirotkina S, Yatime L, Sottrup-Jensen L, Thiel S, Gal P, Andersen GR. Structural basis for activation of the complement system by component C4 cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:15425–15430. [PubMed]
125. Krishnan V, Xu Y, Macon K, Volanakis JE, Narayana SV. The structure of C2b, a fragment of complement component C2 produced during C3 convertase formation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009;65:266–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Gregory LA, Thielens NM, Arlaud GJ, Fontecilla-Camps JC, Gaboriaud C. X-ray structure of the Ca2+-binding interaction domain of C1s. Insights into the assembly of the C1 complex of complement. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:32157–32164. [PubMed]
127. Gaboriaud C, Juanhuix J, Gruez A, Lacroix M, Darnault C, Pignol D, Verger D, Fontecilla-Camps JC, Arlaud GJ. The crystal structure of the globular head of complement protein C1q provides a basis for its versatile recognition properties. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:46974–46982. [PubMed]
128. Milder FJ, Raaijmakers HC, Vandeputte MD, Schouten A, Huizinga EG, Romijn RA, Hemrika W, Roos A, Daha MR, Gros P. Structure of complement component C2A: implications for convertase formation and substrate binding. Structure. 2006;14:1587–1597. [PubMed]
129. Shi J, Rose EL, Singh A, Hussain S, Stagliano NE, Parry GC, Panicker S. TNT003, an inhibitor of the serine protease C1s, prevents complement activation induced by cold agglutinins. Blood. 2014;123:4015–4022. [PubMed]
130. Thomas KA, Valenzuela NM, Gjertson D, Mulder A, Fishbein MC, Parry GC, Panicker S, Reed EF. An Anti-C1s Monoclonal, TNT003, Inhibits Complement Activation Induced by Antibodies Against HLA. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:2037–2049. [PMC free article] [PubMed]