Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Trends Mol Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4994806

Combinatorial Antigen Targeting: Ideal Anti-tumor T-Cell Responses and Sensing


T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are a formidable platform for the study and application of synthetic biology approaches to study customized and flexible control of cellular functions. Recent reports in the journal Cell provide a new twist on combinatorial antigen targeting, profiting from the singular cleavage and signaling of the Notch receptor to conditionally express CARs.

The development of customizable strategies for spatiotemporal control of cellular behavior is one of the grand pursuits of synthetic biology and cell engineering across multiple research fields. It is integral to modern cell-based cancer immunotherapy, which well over a decade ago embraced the concept of T cell engineering with artificial antigen receptors [1]. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) epitomize this radical departure from classic immunology concepts. CARs are prototypic synthetic receptors wherein the extracellular input is a cell surface antigen and the intracellular output a composite T cell activating signal providing functional and metabolic cues to control T cell fate [2]. When targeting CD19, a cell surface molecule found in most leukemias and lymphomas, CAR T cells have produced remarkable clinical results, validating at once the ‘second generation’ CAR design and the synthetic biology approach to cancer immunotherapy [3].

To attain broader relevance, T cell engineering and CAR therapy in particular, must achieve effective tumor targeting and tumor elimination with minimal or tolerable toxicity. This includes averting ‘on-target/off-tumor’ reactivity (when T cells recognize the targeted antigen on normal tissues) and curbing T cell activation to prevent excessive cytokine secretion, referred to as a ‘cytokine release syndrome’ [3]. In order to achieve optimal T cell reactivity, strategies are needed that will afford both spatial control of T cells (by specifically directing them to tumor sites), as well as temporal control (to further constrain effector T cell function).

Several approaches have been proposed to regulate CAR T cell function. These include the use of suicide genes (e.g. the inducible caspase-9 (iCasp9) enzyme) to terminate T cell activity [4], bispecific small molecules that transiently bridge antigen and CAR T cells [5], or dimerizing agents that transiently link the antigen-binding and signaling domains of a CAR [6]. The above studies allow remote temporal control of CAR T cell activity, but they do not address spatial control of antigen engagement and tumor selectivity.

To reach the latter goal, strategies engaging two antigens rather than one, provide an interesting paradigm for achieving greater tumor selectivity. One such approach involves the use of inhibitory receptors, known as iCARs, derived from PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors, which protect normal cells based on iCAR recognition of an antigen present on normal, but not tumor cells [7]. Tumor selectivity can also be enhanced by the use of two receptors with complementary signals: a CAR-mediated minimal T cell activation signal and a chimeric costimulatory receptor (CCR) costimulation signal [8]. This can be achieved provided the two receptors target a pair of antigens co-expressed on tumor, but not normal cells [8] (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
Combinatorial Antigen Targeting Strategies for CAR Therapy

In two recent back-to-back papers published in Cell, Morsut et al. and Roybal et al. take advantage of the synthetic Notch receptor (synNotch) system to achieve spatial control of T cell activation through combinatorial antigen recognition [9, 10]. This approach exploits Notch proteolysis controlled through its transmembrane core domain to induce transcriptional activation, which was previously shown to be modular and amenable to domain swapping [11]. Morsut et al. applied the synNotch concept to multiple settings including neuronal differentiation and lymphoid activation. Importantly, they showed that synNotch is cell-to-cell contact-dependent and controls cellular responses in a spatially-defined manner. Using synthetic transcription factors, the output was orthogonal to other signaling pathways, including the intrinsic Notch pathway [9].

Roybal et al. further documented the function of a CAR-like synNotch receptor to control the transcription of an authentic CAR, thus utilizing combinatorial antigen recognition to spatially control CAR T cell function [10]. To this end, they constructed synNotch receptors bearing a single-chain variable fragment (scFv), specific for either CD19 or GFP, as well as to Gal4-VP64 or TetR-VP64 which are transcriptional effector domains necessary to induce CAR expression. In this manner, a T cell would only be activated when both the synNotch-ligand and the CAR-ligand were simultaneously expressed on a target cell (Figure 1B). Unlike the iCAR and CAR/CCR strategy, the synNotch/CAR signaling circuit works orthogonally and independently from other intracellular signaling pathways (Figure 1A, B). However, the need for receptor cleavage and transcriptional induction create certain vulnerabilities. For instance, there is a dose/response relationship between ligand concentration and receptor activation (some extracellular domains can display poor inducibility). As such, the induction lag time, level and duration of CAR expression may limit T cell efficacy. Depending on the type of extracellular recognition domain, the synNotch receptor may display variable baseline activity, raising concerns about the system’s specificity. Finally, while the use of synthetic transcriptional activators may indeed be orthogonal, the use of natural transcription factors may not be as potent or specific for CAR induction.

When primary CD4+ or CD8+ T cells engineered with an α-GFP-synNotch switch controlling CD19 CAR/luciferase expression were injected into mice bearing single- or dual- antigen CD19+ K562 myelogenous leukemia tumors (on either flank), the CAR/luciferase signal was strongest in the CD19+GFP+ tumor. However, a less intense but increasing luciferase signal was also found in CD19+GFP tumors, possibly due to migration of activated CAR T cells from one tumor (dual-antigen) to the other (single-antigen) [10]. The kinetics of the ON-switch were thus critical in determining tumor selectivity and protection of normal tissues. The induction of CAR expression by synNotch-ligand binding would need to be fast enough to engage the tumor while T cells still localized to it. This would then be followed by decayed CAR expression, timely enough to spare healthy tissues expressing CAR target-antigen. In Jurkat T cells, the effective half-time for T cell activation was ~13h and the half-time for CAR expression decay was ~8h. In a subcutaneous two-tumor mouse model using K562 cells as targets, synNotch/CAR-engineered T cells eradicated CD19+GFP+ tumors and not CD19+GFP tumors [10]. However, the potential toxicity towards a normal tissue remains to be determined.

In principle, the use of synthetic Notch receptor systems has the potential of integrating multiple extracellular inputs, engineer cell signaling cascades and form cellular behavioral patterns in space and time by simply co-expressing multiple synNotch receptors ‘in-line’. This could provide novel opportunities in developmental biology and regenerative medicine and could potentially direct cellular differentiation in vitro. Furthermore the ability of synNotch receptor constructs to integrate defined combinatorial environmental cues can be utilized to study specific cell-cell interactions, including the tumor microenvironment. This possibility may however be curtailed by a necessitated multiplicity of chimeric receptors and synthetic transcriptional regulators, previously shown to be immunogenic in non-human primates [12].

Thus, while Wendell Lim’s reports elegantly demonstrate scFv-dependent control of cellular behavior in response to pre-specified extracellular input and orthogonal CAR induction, the translational potential of this strategy remains uncertain. Addressing the concerns regarding strength, duration and specificity of the synNotch system in more stringent and clinically relevant tumor models should be contemplated. Further quantitative studies of CAR expression kinetics and CAR-T cell migration and function will be needed to clarify the system’s clinical applicability. The definition of ‘safe distances’ shielding healthy tissues from off-tumor/on-target toxicity also remain to be explored. Importantly, the use of multiple non-human transcriptional regulators (Gal4, tTA) also raises immunogenicity concerns, and the alternative use of fully human regulatory proteins may undermine orthogonal signaling properties. Evolution itself has not resolved these challenges outside of a handful of receptors. Nonetheless, these powerful studies have at the very least, described a versatile tool for the study of CAR specificity and potency.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Sadelain M, Riviere I, Brentjens R. Targeting tumours with genetically enhanced T lymphocytes. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2003;3:35–45. [PubMed]
2. van der Stegen SJ, Hamieh M, Sadelain M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nature Reviews Drug discovery. 2015;14:499–509. [PubMed]
3. Sadelain M. CAR therapy: the CD19 paradigm. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2015;125:3392–3400. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Di Stasi A, Tey SK, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, Martinez C, Brenner MK. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;365:1673–1683. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Kim MS, Ma JS, Yun H, Cao Y, Kim JY, Chi V, Kim CH. Redirection of genetically engineered CAR-T cells using bifunctional small molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015;137:2832–2835. [PubMed]
6. Wu CY, Roybal KT, Puchner EM, Onuffer J, Lim WA. Remote control of therapeutic T cells through a small molecule-gated chimeric receptor. Science. 2015;350:aab4077. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Fedorov VD, Themeli M, Sadelain M. PD-1- and CTLA-4-based inhibitory chimeric antigen receptors (iCARs) divert off-target immunotherapy responses. Science translational medicine. 2013;5:215ra172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Kloss CC, Condomines M, Cartellieri M, Bachmann M, Sadelain M. Combinatorial antigen recognition with balanced signaling promotes selective tumor eradication by engineered T cells. Nature biotechnology. 2013;31:71–75. [PubMed]
9. Morsut L, Roybal KT, Xiong X, Gordley RM, Coyle SM, Thomson M, Lim WA. Engineering Customized Cell Sensing and Response Behaviors Using Synthetic Notch Receptors. Cell. 2016;164:780–791. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Roybal KT, Rupp LJ, Morsut L, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Park JS, Lim WA. Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells With Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell. 2016;164:770–779. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Gordon WR, Zimmerman B, He L, Miles LJ, Huang J, Tiyanont K, Blacklow SC. Mechanical Allostery: Evidence for a Force Requirement in the Proteolytic Activation of Notch. Developmental cell. 2015;33:729–736. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Favre D, Blouin V, Provost N, Spisek R, Porrot F, Bohl D, Moullier P. Lack of an immune response against the tetracycline-dependent transactivator correlates with long-term doxycycline-regulated transgene expression in nonhuman primates after intramuscular injection of recombinant adeno-associated virus. Journal of virology. 2002;76:11605–11611. [PMC free article] [PubMed]