|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Acute vascular injuries are the second most common cause of fatalities in patients with multiple traumatic injuries; thus, prompt identification and management is essential for patient survival. Over the past few years, multidetector CT (MDCT) using dual-phase scanning protocol has become the imaging modality of choice in high-energy deceleration traumas. The objective of this article was to review the role of dual-phase MDCT in the identification and management of acute vascular injuries, particularly in the chest and abdomen following multiple traumatic injuries. In addition, this article will provide examples of MDCT features of acute vascular injuries with correlative surgical and interventional findings.
Trauma is one of most common causes of death or permanent disability in people younger than age 40 years and constitutes a serious medical dilemma.1–3 It is usually due to blunt force from deceleration, compression or impaction,4,5 particularly in motor vehicle collisions,6,7 which occur at a speed >65kmh−1 or in a motorcycle collision faster than 35kmh−1.8 With traumatic injuries, a timely approach is crucial; thus, the most appropriate imaging modality is necessary. Multidetector CT (MDCT) with intravenous contrast is excellent at detection and characterization of life-threatening injuries within seconds.8–10
Acute vascular injuries are the second most common cause of death in patients with high-energy polytrauma.11–13 Therefore, the identification and characterization of these injuries is important in order to direct management. An initial CT is important in the assessment of acute vascular injuries in order to determine whether a surgical, interventional or non-operative management is necessary.14–17
Vessel injuries may not be initially diagnosed if the patient is stable and the clinical suspicion is low and so, a high index of suspicion and detailed history such as the mechanism of the trauma is important. The diagnosis of acute vascular injuries usually depends on multiple factors such as radiologist experience, the presence of distraction injuries, lack of correlation with clinical presentation or inadequate CT scan protocol. Frequently, the detection and characterization of vessel injuries is limited because a single-phase CT was used instead of a dual-phase CT protocol.14,18,19
The purpose of this review article was to illustrate the value of dual-phase MDCT protocol in the identification and characterization of acute vascular injuries in the chest and abdomen in patients with high-energy trauma. The correlation between the CT features of vascular injuries and surgical/interventional findings will be discussed.
MDCT is the primary imaging method for the evaluation of the entire chest and abdomen in patients with high-energy blunt trauma7,15 and is the primary tool to evaluate patients with suspected acute vascular injuries.10 CT has replaced catheter angiography as the primary screening study.15,20 However, CT examination protocols are still not standardized. In the emergency settings, all the examinations should be performed with the use of intravenous contrast and with a multiphasic, high-resolution protocol, with slice thickness and reconstruction interval values of about 1mm, complete with multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projection. At our institution, all examinations are performed by a 128-slice MDCT (Siemens SOMATOM® Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare), with slice thickness of 1.2mm, collimation of 2×128×0.6mm and rotation time of 0.28s. The patient should be positioned supine with the arms abducted, if possible.10,21
Basically, a dual-phase MDCT protocol includes a basal scan of the skull followed by an arterial phase from the circle of Willis to the symphysis pubis and venous phase from the diaphragm to the symphysis pubis. All the CT examinations are performed under the supervision of a consultant radiologist who provides full coverage 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. She or he will briefly review the CT scans when the patient is still in the CT scanner; thus, he or she will recommend additional phases (i.e. excretory phase) if required. An intravenous contrast material consists in 100–120ml of iodinated contrast agent (Iomeron 400; Bracco Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) at 400mgml−1 concentration injected at 4–5mls−1, followed by 40ml of saline chaser at the same flow rate to obtain optimal vessel depiction.
An automated bolus tracking, with region of interest placed in the aortic arch at an attenuation threshold of 100HU, is used to time the beginning of the arterial phase. The venous phase is performed at 60–70-s delay from the end of the injection. Three-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projection are routinely performed to display the vessel anatomy and look for possible injuries. A delayed, excretory phase (180-s delay from the end of the venous phase or later) can be added in select cases, if there is suspected injury to the collecting system or bladder.
In patients with high-energy blunt trauma, significant vascular injuries may be unsuspected at the arrival at the emergency department, as their presence become clinically evident only when the shock status or haemodynamic instability occurs.1,22 To avoid underestimation, the choice of an appropriate dual-phase protocol, including the arterial and venous phases, is crucial.
When an acute vascular injury is detected, it is important to identify the vessel, type of vessel (arterial or venous) and type of injury, since this will affect management. Acute vascular injures encompass a wide spectrum of findings, ranging from spasm, intimal tears, intramural haematoma, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and haemorrhage to vessel transection and avulsion.23 State-of-the-art MDCT provides optimal depiction and characterization of all these vascular injuries.1,5,14,23 Actually, the appropriate scan parameters and CT protocol of study are critical. The arterial phase of image acquisition improves the detection of arterial injures, pseudoaneurysms and AVF5,14 while the portal venous phase is essential to detect venous injuries, bleeding and to differentiate contained vascular injures from actively bleeding lesions.4,10,14,24,25 Therefore, both phases should be routinely included in the whole-body CT evaluation of patients with deceleration injury.1,5,14,18,19,26–28
An intimal or periadventitial defect can be frequently seen on the angiography CT scan of patients with blunt trauma. One of the vessels most frequently involved is the thoracic aorta. MDCT angiography has a reported sensitivity of 95–100% and a negative-predictive value approaching 100% for the detection of blunt traumatic injuries of the aorta.9
The most common imaging finding of an intimal tear is a rounded or triangular intraluminal filling defect <10mm in length or width near to the vessel wall without external contour abnormality (Figure 1).9
This finding arises from an injury of the intima while the media and adventitia remain intact. It usually occurs within the proximity of the aortic isthmus, which is the site of attachment of the ligamentum arteriosum.29–31
Aortic injuries have been classified based upon their severity by Azizzadeh et al.24 An intimal tear is considered as Type I, intramural haematoma as Type II, pseudoaneurysm as Type III and ruptured vessel as Type IV.32
It is important to assess the grade of an aortic injury, since it affects patient management. Typically, Type I injuries heal spontaneously (Figure 1) while Types II–IV should be repaired surgically.32–34 When an intimal defect compromises the lumen for <10% or an intimal flap of <1cm is present without or with minimal periaortic haematoma, the lesion can be considered “minimal” and follow-up is recommended (Figure 1). Intimal tears may also lead to intraluminal thrombosis owing to the endoluminal exposure of thrombotic subintimal factors or evolve in vessel dissection.35 Despite these possible complications, several studies recommend that in the acute phase, intimal tears can be managed conservatively and in the long term, imaging would be useful to evaluate the outcome.36
Intimal tear and dissection are less commonly observed in the ascending aorta, since these lesions cause early trauma mortality. In these cases, a good knowledge of the artefacts and pitfalls in the imaging of thoracic aortic dissections may help in avoiding misinterpretations.37 When an examination is conducted on new MDCT scans, fast image acquisition and post-processing improvements help eliminate or reduce breathing and/or cardiac artefacts, thus providing better quality images. However, in select cases, an electrocardiography-gated thoracic CT may be considered to avoid misinterpretations.37–39
Intramural haematoma is a haematoma which develops in the media tunic of the vessel wall (Figure 2). Intramural haematoma is diagnosed by the presence of thickening of 0.5mm of the vessel wall in the absence of evidence of blood flow.40,41
The sensitivity of MDCT, with unenhanced acquisition followed by contrast-enhanced acquisition, in the detection of this condition has been reported to be up to 96%.35 It is suggested that intramural haematomas should be treated (Figure 2), since they may progress to frank aortic dissection over time.41
Pseudoaneurysm is an outpouching of the external vessel contour due to disruption of all three wall layers, which is contained only by the connective tissue around the vessel.40
On MDCT, a pseudoaneurysm is a round or oval irregularity of the outer contour of the vessel wall of equal density to the intra-arterial contrast material, with a collar of separation from the vessel lumen (Figure 3).
When the intraluminal pressure increases, the pseudoaneurysm can easily rupture. Therefore, patients should be treated regardless of its diameter (Figure 3).32,34,40 A pseudoaneurysm can form suddenly after trauma or can be secondary to a less severely injured vessel; furthermore, if patients with high-energy blunt trauma are not evaluated with MDCT angiography, it can be undiagnosed and discovered later.
Chronic aortic pseudoaneurysms are detected in up to 5% of cases of undetected aortic injuries.7,32,42 They are usually asymptomatic and can be incidentally identified on chest radiograph or CT. They can be confused for a soft-tissue mass contiguous to the aortic wall or calcified lymph node, since a calcification rim may be present.31
Within the abdomen, pseudoaneurysms are most frequently encountered in the spleen, since this is the most commonly injured abdominal organ in blunt trauma.5,43 An accurate identification is crucial, since angiographic embolization is the treatment of choice (Figures 4–6).5,25,43 MDCT protocol should include an arterial phase,1,14,25,43 since it allows the detection of AVF and improves the detection of pseudoaneurysm in the spleen (Figure 5).14,24 The arterial phase allows the identification of the circumscribed area of medium contrast attenuation with the wash in and washout similar to those of the contiguous artery; however, in the portal venous phase, the attenuation is similar to the parenchyma. Thus, the detection of a pseudoaneurysm on the portal venous phase is very difficult (Figure 5).10,25
This is another contained vascular injury, which consists of a traumatic communication between the arterial and venous systems. An AVF may arise from a blunt or, more commonly, penetrating trauma.24,33
On MDCT, AVF is an asymmetrical, early contrast opacification of a vein, during the arterial phase (Figure 7); thus, an arterial phase is necessary to make the diagnosis.
It is important to detect a traumatic AVF, since it usually enlarges with time and may lead to haemodynamic alterations because of the abnormal shunt of blood from the artery into the vein; thus, the distal circulation and capillaries are bypassed.44
An undiagnosed AVF can become more difficult to repair and can cause congestive heart failure and irreversible venous stasis changes.33 AVF can occur in the spleen, frequently with pseudoaneurysm. Therefore, the arterial phase plays a key role in AVF detection, since the early enhancement of the splenic vein is diagnostic.5,14,24,45 AVF can be asymptomatic or may lead to abdominal pain, congestion of the mesenteric vessels and portal hypertension.46,47
MDCT angiography plays an important role in the detection of bleeding and assists in directing patient management.48 Acute haemorrhage is treated with emergency surgery when associated with parenchymal disruption, and with transarterial embolization1,49 or conservative management, depending on its origin (arterial or venous), shape (spot, jet and pooling) and flow rate when the parenchymal injury is limited. Therefore, a single phase is not sufficient. Dual phase is recommended in most cases to provide a complete assessment in patients with polytrauma.
On MDCT, active bleeding is recognized as a region of extraluminal contrast agent extravasation, which increases and changes its morphology during multiphasic acquisitions (Figure 8).5,24 Its shape depends on the blood flow rate and appears as jet-like, linear or spot-like or pooling of bleeding (Figure 8).5,25,45,50 A spot or small jet of bleeding is frequently seen within the abdominal solid organs, mesentery or muscles (Figures 9–11). In most cases, non-operative management or transcatheter embolization can be effective depending on the patient age and initial haemodynamic status (Figures 12 and and1313).
On the contrary, with a large region of active haemorrhage especially within the mesentery or adjacent to bowel loops (Figure 8) or if associated with parenchymal disruption, emergency surgery is necessary (Figure 14). Therefore, dual-phase MDCT is critical for identification and characterization of bleeding and to differentiate contained vascular injuries from actively bleeding.
Another important issue is to identify the origin of the bleeding, if it is arterial or venous in origin, since it affects management. This is crucial especially in the setting of pelvic blunt trauma. Actually, when the CT is limited to the portal phase, it is not possible to obtain an adequate differentiation between the two haemorrhage types or to correctly identify the vessel of origin.51 When an arterial bleeding occurs in the pelvis, it is mostly treated with emergent intervention or angiographic embolization, while venous bleeding can be initially treated non-operatively (Figures 15–17).4,5,49
Vessel transection may be complete or incomplete,33 but it represents a life-threatening condition leading in almost all cases to patient death.52 Transection or vessel avulsion is either an indication for immediate surgery (Figure 18) or embolization. Rupture is seen as an abnormality in the vessel contour due to full thickness laceration with free contrast extravasation detectable in the arterial phase (Figure 19) and becomes a hyperdense blood collection. It can occur in the ascending or descending thoracic aorta, causing haemopericardium or haemomediastinum. It can also occur in the abdominal aorta causing haemoperitoneum or in a branch vessel causing active bleeding and devascularization of the supplied organs.31 When a vessel is transected, immediate endovascular (in incomplete transection) or surgical treatment (in avulsion) should be attempted, even if the prognosis is usually poor.40
MDCT angiography represents the gold standard for polytraumatized patients with vascular injury from high-energy blunt trauma and is also effective in the follow-up of patients undergoing vascular surgery. In the diagnostic MDCT approach of patients with blunt trauma and suspected vascular injury, a dual-phase CT protocol is strongly recommended because it identifies all types of arterial injuries, from intimal tears which are treated conservatively to vascular injuries which require prompt surgical intervention or frequent surveillance.