PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Opin Virol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4940123
NIHMSID: NIHMS773395

Implications of broadly neutralizing antibodies in the development of a universal influenza vaccine

Abstract

Serum antibodies are the major correlate of influenza vaccine efficacy, providing short-term protection against infection. Recent efforts have been focused on studying antibody responses at a monoclonal level to understand their role in protection against influenza, and to ultimately improve vaccine strategies to provide broader, long-term immunity against influenza virus. These studies have shown that broadly neutralizing antibodies specific for the conserved stem domain of the hemagglutinin protein can target multiple strains of influenza. These antibodies show great promise both from a therapeutic perspective as well as for guiding vaccine design efforts. In this review, we will summarize past and recent findings about broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza, and discuss how these findings may guide development of universal vaccine strategies.

Introduction

Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States alone, influenza can cause more than 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths per year [1,2]. Occasionally, a novel influenza strain can be introduced into the population. If little or no pre-existing immunity exists towards these new strains, a pandemic can occur, increasing both the healthcare and economic burden induced by influenza, as was recently observed during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [3]. These strains are typically a consequence of antigenic shift, in which two different strains of influenza virus exchange components of their segmented RNA genome to create a novel viral pathogen against which humans may have little to no pre-existing immunity [4,5]. While generally ineffective against these pandemic strains, the seasonal influenza vaccine has proven to be an effective preventative measure against commonly circulating influenza viruses. However, making the seasonal influenza vaccine is a complex and challenging process [6]. A new vaccine is administered every season because protection is short-lived [7,8], and the influenza virus can undergo antigenic drift, in which the virus mutates very rapidly, allowing it to produce escape mutants that can evade immune recognition by the host. Antigenic drift can occasionally prevent the vaccine from targeting the circulating virus strain, which lowers the efficacy of the seasonal influenza vaccine. This scenario occurred most recently during the 2014/2015 flu season with a drifted H3 virus strain [9].

The vaccine works primarily by eliciting antibodies that target the hemagglutinin protein, which consists of two domains: HA1 and HA2. HA1, the head domain, allows the virus to attach to sialic acid receptors on host cells, allowing for endocytosis and entry of the virus into the target cell. HA2, the stem domain, controls the membrane fusion process. Of the two, HA1 is the immunodominant epitope, with a large majority of antibodies targeting this domain. Unfortunately, HA1 is highly variable between influenza strains, and is also the major site for mutations leading to antigenic drift [10]. In contrast, the HA2 domain is much more conserved between virus strains and is relatively infrequently mutated [10] (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Influenza virus and the HA protein

Based on a large body of evidence from the last several years [1114], it is thought that preferentially targeting the antibody response against the HA2 domain will result in broadly neutralizing antibodies capable of protection against a wide spectrum of influenza viruses, including both pandemic and drifted strains of influenza. Intense efforts directed towards developing this type of “universal” vaccine are ongoing, as well as efforts to develop broadly neutralizing antibodies for use as therapeutic agents, particularly in vulnerable populations that normally do not respond well to vaccination.

Broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies

One of the first broadly neutralizing influenza specific monoclonal antibodies, C179, was isolated in 1993 from a mouse immunized with an H2N2 strain of influenza virus. It was found to neutralize multiple H1 and H2 strains of influenza virus, but exhibited no hemagglutination inhibition activity. Mapping of the C179 antibody suggested that the antibody bound the HA2 stem domain [15]. Recent technological advances has allowed for high throughput generation of human monoclonal antibodies. These novel approaches include improved memory B cell immortalization [1618] and single cell expression-cloning from either plasmablasts [1921] or antigen-labeled memory B cells [22] (Table 1). Using these approaches, broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies have been isolated from humans infected with influenza [21,23,24], as well as from influenza vaccinees [16,17,20,2427]. Importantly, studies in humans have not only illustrated that these antibodies exist, but also that under certain conditions they can make up a major part of the immune response [21]. One study comparing experimental infection to seasonal vaccine responses in a human challenge study also reported that infection appeared to elicit a more diverse and cross-reactive response [24]. The majority of the broadly neutralizing antibodies described to date appear to be limited to reactivity within the influenza Group 1 viruses [16,20,21,23,24,27]. Smaller numbers of additional antibodies have also been identified that neutralize Group 2 [17] or B strains of viruses [26]. Even more rare are some antibodies that can neutralize both Group 1 and Group 2 viruses, which suggest that a heterosubtypic antibody response cross-reactive with all influenza strains could potentially be induced [20,25]. Epitope mapping of these antibodies, primarily through competition ELISAs and X-ray crystallography, revealed that many are directed towards the stem domain, and neutralize by inhibiting key conformational changes necessary for the fusion process [17,23,25,28]. The antibody 5J8, isolated by EBV transformed human memory B cells, broadly neutralized H1 strains of influenza, but uniquely targeted the receptor binding pocket on the HA globular head, revealing other potential targets within the HA protein for broad neutralization [18] (Table 2). Many of the aforementioned antibodies can provide both therapeutic and prophylactic protection against multiple viral strains when tested in a mouse model of infection [16,18,21,26].

Table 1
Human broadly neutralizing antibodies
Table 2
Mechanisms of neutralization

Studies of these broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have been important for the influenza field. A passive transfer of broadly neutralizing stem specific antibodies may provide an effective therapeutic measure for humans, especially since this structure is so highly conserved, and appears resistant to mutational drift [23,27]. This option might be especially attractive for highly exposed healthcare workers in the context of an outbreak (before availability of a vaccine), or for individuals who are unable to respond to vaccination, such as transplant patients treated with immunosuppressants, cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, or patients with immunodeficiencies. Further, studying epitopes of broadly neutralizing antibodies has presented the stem domain as a potential target for rational design of a broadly protective influenza vaccine. The large body of work describing the isolation and characterization of broadly neutralizing antibodies from humans suggest that a universal vaccine is feasible, and multiple efforts are directed to generating such broadly protective influenza vaccines [29]

Characterizing broadly neutralizing antibodies

Not only is the epitope of broadly neutralizing antibodies significant, but the inherent properties of these antibodies are also of importance. An important finding is that many of the broadly neutralizing antibodies use a VH1-69 immunoglobulin re-arrangement [21]. Interestingly, binding of antibodies with this re-arrangement to the stem domain has been shown to be mediated primarily by the heavy chain with little contribution of the light chain [28]. Additionally, while many antibodies are still able to retain their binding when reverted to the VH1-69 germline sequence, the presence of multiple VH1-69 polymorphisms that do not bind suggests that there may be a genetic bias in the ability to mount broadly neutralizing antibody responses, with certain alleles of VH1-69 being more favorable in producing these antibodies [30,31*]. However, human-derived broadly neutralizing antibodies that do not use the VH1-69 gene have also been characterized, signifying that cross-reactivity is not exclusively linked to the VH1-69 allele [22]. Further identification of what, if any, common features of non-VH1-69 broadly neutralizing antibodies exists would help to address any concerns that a genetic bias may impact in the efficacy of a universal vaccine.

Current research has also moved towards characterizing the Fc domain of antibodies and understanding their function in broadly neutralizing antibodies. A recent study showed that the glycoform of stem-reactive antibodies may have important implications in the generation of a broadly neutralizing response. Immune complexes (IC) formed by an antibody with a sialylated Fc domain and an HA antigen were able to induce inhibitory receptors on B cells, which presumably raises the threshold for the affinity required for activation. In mice, vaccination with these sialylated ICs, compared to asialylated IC, not only improved vaccine responses, but was also broadly protective against multiple influenza strains. Based on these observations, this study proposed that B cells producing stem-reactive antibodies have a much higher activation threshold than those that bind the head domain. This may explain the paucity of broadly neutralizing antibodies in vivo compared to those binding the head domain [32**]. FcγR are also clearly important in the function of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Using FcγR knock-out mice, it was shown that prophylactic activity of stem-reactive antibodies, but not head-reactive ones, are mediated through FcγR in an ADCC-dependent manner [33].

A recent study showed that while stem-reactive monoclonal antibodies tend to have lower neutralizing activity than head-reactive antibodies, a polyclonal mixture of stem-reactive antibodies rescues the potency of neutralization. Additionally, expressing certain antibodies in an IgA backbone, as opposed to an IgG backbone, appeared to improve neutralization activity of the antibodies, which was relevant because this study detected stem-reactive IgA+ memory B cells in humans [34*]. This is important because most studies have focused on IgG stem-reactive responses, and redirecting efforts towards IgA antibodies may help us glean more information about generating broadly neutralizing antibody responses.

Boosting stem-reactive memory B cells

While stem reactive memory B cells are a part of the human B cell repertoire, they normally exist at very low frequencies, and are only boosted in the context of exposure to a very different HA protein. Presumably, robust responses would be required for sufficient protection, and thus, many studies are currently focused on understanding how to target and boost B cells that secrete these broadly neutralizing antibodies. The current theory is that stem-reactive memory B cells exist in small numbers, whereas those specific for the head domain are more abundant. When encountering a new strain of influenza which lacks the immunodominant epitopes recognized by head-reactive memory B cells, the stem-reactive memory B cells can be preferentially boosted by subdominant conserved epitopes, as these cells respond much quicker than naïve B cells that must be primed by novel epitopes. This theory has been supported through observations that broadly neutralizing antibodies seem to be boosted in individuals responding to the novel 2009 pandemic H1N1 strain [21,35]. In addition, prior vaccination and infection history seems to impact the antibody response [36]. People who have a more diverse history of influenza infection have much higher titers of antibodies specific for the HA stem domain, suggesting that prior encounters with diverse influenza virus strains greatly impact the number of protective broadly neutralizing antibodies that can be generated [37]. Another study suggests that while diverse influenza strains may boost stem-reactive antibodies, repeat exposure to common influenza strains primarily boost head-reactive responses and limit the expansion of broadly neutralizing antibodies [38*]. A recent study was able to detect stem-reactive memory B cells in healthy controls prior to a recent infection or vaccination. However, these stem-reactive memory B cells were found in much lower numbers than head-reactive memory B cells. Stem-reactive memory B cells could be boosted by an immunization with a novel H5N1 strain, whereas vaccination with the normal seasonal vaccine boosted head-reactive memory B cells with no effect on the number of stem-reactive memory B cells [39**].

Targeting specific anatomical niches to boost broadly neutralizing antibody responses may also be important. A recent mouse study suggests that memory B cells specific for broadly neutralizing epitopes may reside primarily in the lungs instead of in circulation or in secondary lymphoid organs. These lung-resident memory B cells were highly mutated, and were generated as a result of local persistent germinal centers that are responding to prolonged viral antigens found in the lung. These tissue-resident memory B cells provided robust protection against a drifted virus in a secondary challenge model, confirming the importance of these memory B cells in generating a cross-reactive, broadly neutralizing antibody response against influenza [40**]. Although these findings have not yet been confirmed in humans, it does suggest a role for tissue-resident memory B cells in providing broadly neutralizing responses. Because most studies of human broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have focused primarily on B cells isolated from blood samples, a focus on lung-resident memory B cells may provide greater insight in how to generate broadly neutralizing antibodies. Current vaccination delivery strategies may want to consider how to best boost lung-resident memory B cells to elicit potent broadly protective responses.

Future prospects for universal vaccine strategies

Studies of broadly neutralizing antibodies have culminated in the generation of several vaccine strategies, reviewed in this current series by Dr. Krammer, entitled “Novel Influenza Virus Vaccine Approaches”. Early strategies focused on delivering stem-domain antigens, in the absence of the immunogenic head domain, in order to target broadly neutralizing antibodies. However, responses were suboptimal, likely because removal of the head domain destroyed important conformational epitopes, or destabilized the stem domain in such a way that it was no longer able to elicit protective antibody responses [41,42]. A recent promising strategy uses a vaccine consisting of a chimeric HA structure made of the conserved HA stem domain of an H1 or H3 strain of influenza, capped with the HA head domain from an exotic zoonotic influenza strain that has not been previously encountered by the human population. This includes those from avian virus strains such as the H5, H6, or H9 subtypes [4345]. Because these novel head domains will be unable to activate pre-existing head-specific memory B cells, this vaccine strategy will likely direct recall responses to stimulate pre-existing stem-reactive memory B cells. This vaccination strategy has been effective in mouse models, and efforts are being made to translate these findings in ongoing human clinical trials. Another novel approach that could elicit a broadly neutralizing antibody response involves nanoparticles presenting H1 HA-stem antigens, which showed moderate protection in mice and ferret models in an H5 infection challenge model [46*]. Other laboratories have continued to try to engineer stable HA-stem antigens to deliver in a vaccine [4749]. Recently, a group was able to create a stable trimeric stem-HA that elicited antibodies capable of broadly neutralizing both H1 and H5 influenza strains [48].

The seasonal influenza vaccine is efficient at eliciting antibodies that provide protection against infection. However, the response is limited in terms of longevity and breadth of protection, which is important considering the diversity and mutability of the influenza virus. The isolation and study of broadly neutralizing antibodies from humans have highlighted the stem-domain of the influenza virus as an important antigen that may provide a crucial target in generating robust protection against a wide spectrum of influenza strains. Continued efforts to further characterize the phenotype and function of these antibodies will guide the development of a universal vaccine that could replace the seasonal influenza vaccine by providing long-lasting protection against both seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses.

Highlights

  • Novel single cell technologies have enabled rapid generation of human monoclonal antibodies
  • These technologies have identified broadly neutralizing mAbs that target the HA stem domain.
  • These antibodies have guided efforts to generate a universal influenza vaccine and therapeutic mAbs.

Acknowledgments

Funding support was provided by NIH/NIAID CEIRS contracts HHSN272201400004C and HHSN266200700006C and grant U19AI057266. We thank Drs. Lalita Priyamvada and Robert Kauffman for critical reading of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review have been highlighted as:

* of special interest

** of outstanding interest

1. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Bridges CB, Cox NJ, Fukuda K. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004;292:1333–1340. [PubMed]
2. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:179–186. [PubMed]
3. Writing Committee of the WHOCoCAoPI. Bautista E, Chotpitayasunondh T, Gao Z, Harper SA, Shaw M, Uyeki TM, Zaki SR, Hayden FG, Hui DS, et al. Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1708–1719. [PubMed]
4. Bouvier NM, Palese P. The biology of influenza viruses. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 4):D49–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Parrish CR, Kawaoka Y. The origins of new pandemic viruses: the acquisition of new host ranges by canine parvovirus and influenza A viruses. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:553–586. [PubMed]
6. Gerdil C. The annual production cycle for influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21:1776–1779. [PubMed]
7. Clements ML, Murphy BR. Development and persistence of local and systemic antibody responses in adults given live attenuated or inactivated influenza A virus vaccine. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:66–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Mohn KG, Bredholt G, Brokstad KA, Pathirana RD, Aarstad HJ, Tondel C, Cox RJ. Longevity of B-cell and T-cell responses after live attenuated influenza vaccination in children. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:1541–1549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Chambers BS, Parkhouse K, Ross TM, Alby K, Hensley SE. Identification of Hemagglutinin Residues Responsible for H3N2 Antigenic Drift during the 2014–2015 Influenza Season. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Wiley DC, Wilson IA, Skehel JJ. Structural identification of the antibody-binding sites of Hong Kong influenza haemagglutinin and their involvement in antigenic variation. Nature. 1981;289:373–378. [PubMed]
11. Air GM. Influenza virus antigenicity and broadly neutralizing epitopes. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;11:113–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Chiu C, Wrammert J, Li GM, McCausland M, Wilson PC, Ahmed R. Cross-reactive humoral responses to influenza and their implications for a universal vaccine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1283:13–21. [PubMed]
13. Ekiert DC, Wilson IA. Broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus and prospects for universal therapies. Curr Opin Virol. 2012;2:134–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Lee PS, Wilson IA. Structural characterization of viral epitopes recognized by broadly cross-reactive antibodies. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;386:323–341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Okuno Y, Isegawa Y, Sasao F, Ueda S. A common neutralizing epitope conserved between the hemagglutinins of influenza A virus H1 and H2 strains. J Virol. 1993;67:2552–2558. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Corti D, Suguitan AL, Jr, Pinna D, Silacci C, Fernandez-Rodriguez BM, Vanzetta F, Santos C, Luke CJ, Torres-Velez FJ, Temperton NJ, et al. Heterosubtypic neutralizing antibodies are produced by individuals immunized with a seasonal influenza vaccine. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1663–1673. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Ekiert DC, Friesen RH, Bhabha G, Kwaks T, Jongeneelen M, Yu W, Ophorst C, Cox F, Korse HJ, Brandenburg B, et al. A highly conserved neutralizing epitope on group 2 influenza A viruses. Science. 2011;333:843–850. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Krause JC, Tsibane T, Tumpey TM, Huffman CJ, Basler CF, Crowe JE., Jr A broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibody that recognizes a conserved, novel epitope on the globular head of the influenza H1N1 virus hemagglutinin. J Virol. 2011;85:10905–10908. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Wrammert J, Smith K, Miller J, Langley WA, Kokko K, Larsen C, Zheng NY, Mays I, Garman L, Helms C, et al. Rapid cloning of high-affinity human monoclonal antibodies against influenza virus. Nature. 2008;453:667–671. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Li GM, Chiu C, Wrammert J, McCausland M, Andrews SF, Zheng NY, Lee JH, Huang M, Qu X, Edupuganti S, et al. Pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine induces a recall response in humans that favors broadly cross-reactive memory B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:9047–9052. [PubMed]
21. Wrammert J, Koutsonanos D, Li GM, Edupuganti S, Sui J, Morrissey M, McCausland M, Skountzou I, Hornig M, Lipkin WI, et al. Broadly cross-reactive antibodies dominate the human B cell response against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection. J Exp Med. 2011;208:181–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Whittle JR, Wheatley AK, Wu L, Lingwood D, Kanekiyo M, Ma SS, Narpala SR, Yassine HM, Frank GM, Yewdell JW, et al. Flow cytometry reveals that H5N1 vaccination elicits cross-reactive stem-directed antibodies from multiple Ig heavy-chain lineages. J Virol. 2014;88:4047–4057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Sui J, Hwang WC, Perez S, Wei G, Aird D, Chen LM, Santelli E, Stec B, Cadwell G, Ali M, et al. Structural and functional bases for broad-spectrum neutralization of avian and human influenza A viruses. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:265–273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Moody MA, Zhang R, Walter EB, Woods CW, Ginsburg GS, McClain MT, Denny TN, Chen X, Munshaw S, Marshall DJ, et al. H3N2 influenza infection elicits more cross-reactive and less clonally expanded anti-hemagglutinin antibodies than influenza vaccination. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25797. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Corti D, Voss J, Gamblin SJ, Codoni G, Macagno A, Jarrossay D, Vachieri SG, Pinna D, Minola A, Vanzetta F, et al. A neutralizing antibody selected from plasma cells that binds to group 1 and group 2 influenza A hemagglutinins. Science. 2011;333:850–856. [PubMed]
26. Dreyfus C, Laursen NS, Kwaks T, Zuijdgeest D, Khayat R, Ekiert DC, Lee JH, Metlagel Z, Bujny MV, Jongeneelen M, et al. Highly conserved protective epitopes on influenza B viruses. Science. 2012;337:1343–1348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Throsby M, van den Brink E, Jongeneelen M, Poon LL, Alard P, Cornelissen L, Bakker A, Cox F, van Deventer E, Guan Y, et al. Heterosubtypic neutralizing monoclonal antibodies cross-protective against H5N1 and H1N1 recovered from human IgM+ memory B cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3942. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Lingwood D, McTamney PM, Yassine HM, Whittle JR, Guo X, Boyington JC, Wei CJ, Nabel GJ. Structural and genetic basis for development of broadly neutralizing influenza antibodies. Nature. 2012;489:566–570. [PubMed]
29. Krammer F, Palese P. Advances in the development of influenza virus vaccines. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:167–182. [PubMed]
30. Wheatley AK, Whittle JR, Lingwood D, Kanekiyo M, Yassine HM, Ma SS, Narpala SR, Prabhakaran MS, Matus-Nicodemos RA, Bailer RT, et al. H5N1 Vaccine-Elicited Memory B Cells Are Genetically Constrained by the IGHV Locus in the Recognition of a Neutralizing Epitope in the Hemagglutinin Stem. J Immunol. 2015;195:602–610. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
*31. Pappas L, Foglierini M, Piccoli L, Kallewaard NL, Turrini F, Silacci C, Fernandez-Rodriguez B, Agatic G, Giacchetto-Sasselli I, Pellicciotta G, et al. Rapid development of broadly influenza neutralizing antibodies through redundant mutations. Nature. 2014;516:418–422. Describes the specific hallmarks of the CDR3 region of the Vh-169 gene that are needed for binding the stem domain of HA, and also notes the redundancy in somatic hypermutation observed in these genes. [PubMed]
**32. Wang TT, Maamary J, Tan GS, Bournazos S, Davis CW, Krammer F, Schlesinger SJ, Palese P, Ahmed R, Ravetch JV. Anti-HA Glycoforms Drive B Cell Affinity Selection and Determine Influenza Vaccine Efficacy. Cell. 2015;162:160–169. This study shows that the sialylyation of stem-reactive antibodies may have important implications in the overal efficacy of influenza vaccine responses. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. DiLillo DJ, Tan GS, Palese P, Ravetch JV. Broadly neutralizing hemagglutinin stalk-specific antibodies require FcgammaR interactions for protection against influenza virus in vivo. Nat Med. 2014;20:143–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
*34. He W, Mullarkey CE, Duty JA, Moran TM, Palese P, Miller MS. Broadly neutralizing anti-influenza virus antibodies: enhancement of neutralizing potency in polyclonal mixtures and IgA backbones. J Virol. 2015;89:3610–3618. The authors focus on the neutralizing capacity of cross-reactive antibodies as a polyclonal mixture, as well as monoclonals of the IgA isotype. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Pica N, Hai R, Krammer F, Wang TT, Maamary J, Eggink D, Tan GS, Krause JC, Moran T, Stein CR, et al. Hemagglutinin stalk antibodies elicited by the 2009 pandemic influenza virus as a mechanism for the extinction of seasonal H1N1 viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:2573–2578. [PubMed]
36. Li Y, Myers JL, Bostick DL, Sullivan CB, Madara J, Linderman SL, Liu Q, Carter DM, Wrammert J, Esposito S, et al. Immune history shapes specificity of pandemic H1N1 influenza antibody responses. J Exp Med. 2013;210:1493–1500. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Miller MS, Gardner TJ, Krammer F, Aguado LC, Tortorella D, Basler CF, Palese P. Neutralizing antibodies against previously encountered influenza virus strains increase over time: a longitudinal analysis. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:198ra107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
*38. Andrews SF, Huang Y, Kaur K, Popova LI, Ho IY, Pauli NT, Henry Dunand CJ, Taylor WM, Lim S, Huang M, et al. Immune history profoundly affects broadly protective B cell responses to influenza. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:316ra192. This study focuses on the relevance of repeat vaccinations over consecutive years. They show that revaccination with similar strains of influenza biased antibody responses towards the immunodominant head domain and impeded generation of braodly neutralizing antibodies. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
**39. Ellebedy AH, Krammer F, Li GM, Miller MS, Chiu C, Wrammert J, Chang CY, Davis CW, McCausland M, Elbein R, et al. Induction of broadly cross-reactive antibody responses to the influenza HA stem region following H5N1 vaccination in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:13133–13138. Data from this study strongly confirms the theory that a small number of stem-reactive memory B cells can be effecitvely boosted by an exposure to pandemic influenza vaccine. [PubMed]
**40. Adachi Y, Onodera T, Yamada Y, Daio R, Tsuiji M, Inoue T, Kobayashi K, Kurosaki T, Ato M, Takahashi Y. Distinct germinal center selection at local sites shapes memory B cell response to viral escape. J Exp Med. 2015 The authors of this study use a mouse model to demonstrate the importance of lung-resident memory B cells in providing a protective, broadly neutralizing responses against multiple strains of influenza. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Graves PN, Schulman JL, Young JF, Palese P. Preparation of influenza virus subviral particles lacking the HA1 subunit of hemagglutinin: unmasking of cross-reactive HA2 determinants. Virology. 1983;126:106–116. [PubMed]
42. Steel J, Lowen AC, Wang TT, Yondola M, Gao Q, Haye K, Garcia-Sastre A, Palese P. Influenza virus vaccine based on the conserved hemagglutinin stalk domain. MBio. 2010;1 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Hai R, Krammer F, Tan GS, Pica N, Eggink D, Maamary J, Margine I, Albrecht RA, Palese P. Influenza viruses expressing chimeric hemagglutinins: globular head and stalk domains derived from different subtypes. J Virol. 2012;86:5774–5781. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Krammer F, Pica N, Hai R, Margine I, Palese P. Chimeric hemagglutinin influenza virus vaccine constructs elicit broadly protective stalk-specific antibodies. J Virol. 2013;87:6542–6550. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Margine I, Krammer F, Hai R, Heaton NS, Tan GS, Andrews SA, Runstadler JA, Wilson PC, Albrecht RA, Garcia-Sastre A, et al. Hemagglutinin stalk-based universal vaccine constructs protect against group 2 influenza A viruses. J Virol. 2013;87:10435–10446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
*46. Yassine HM, Boyington JC, McTamney PM, Wei CJ, Kanekiyo M, Kong WP, Gallagher JR, Wang L, Zhang Y, Joyce MG, et al. Hemagglutinin-stem nanoparticles generate heterosubtypic influenza protection. Nat Med. 2015;21:1065–1070. This laboratory utilized a nanoparticle to effectively present the stem-domain of the HA protein. Vaccination with this construct protected mice against a lethal H5N1 experimental infection. [PubMed]
47. Mallajosyula VV, Citron M, Ferrara F, Lu X, Callahan C, Heidecker GJ, Sarma SP, Flynn JA, Temperton NJ, Liang X, et al. Influenza hemagglutinin stem-fragment immunogen elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies and confers heterologous protection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E2514–2523. [PubMed]
48. Impagliazzo A, Milder F, Kuipers H, Wagner MV, Zhu X, Hoffman RM, van Meersbergen R, Huizingh J, Wanningen P, Verspuij J, et al. A stable trimeric influenza hemagglutinin stem as a broadly protective immunogen. Science. 2015;349:1301–1306. [PubMed]
49. Lu Y, Welsh JP, Swartz JR. Production and stabilization of the trimeric influenza hemagglutinin stem domain for potentially broadly protective influenza vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:125–130. [PubMed]