PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
 
Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 29358.
Published online 2016 July 8. doi:  10.1038/srep29358
PMCID: PMC4937433

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatic cell lines as a new model for host interaction with hepatitis B virus

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is not eradicated by current antiviral therapies due to persistence of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in host cells, and thus development of novel culture models for productive HBV infection is urgently needed, which will allow the study of HBV cccDNA eradication. To meet this need, we developed culture models of HBV infection using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte lineages, including immature proliferating hepatic progenitor-like cell lines (iPS-HPCs) and differentiated hepatocyte-like cells (iPS-Heps). These cells were susceptible to HBV infection, produced HBV particles, and maintained innate immune responses. The infection efficiency of HBV in iPS-HPCs predominantly depended on the expression levels of sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP), and was low relative to iPS-Heps: however, long-term culture of iPS-Heps was difficult. To provide a model for HBV persistence, iPS-HPCs overexpressing NTCP were established. The long-term persistence of HBV cccDNA was detected in iPS-HPCs overexpressing NTCP, and depended on the inhibition of the Janus-kinase signaling pathway. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that iPS-derived hepatic cell lines can be utilized for novel HBV culture models with genetic variation to investigate the interactions between HBV and host cells and the development of anti-HBV strategies.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health threat, with more than 240 million humans chronically infected worldwide at risk of developing end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma1. Nucleos(t)ide analogues suppress HBV replication; however, they cannot eliminate HBV from host cells because of the persistence of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), which serves as the template for viral transcription2,3. Interferon (IFN)-α is also licensed for chronic hepatitis B treatment; however, its efficacy for HBV clearance is limited4. It is essential to elucidate the further mechanisms involved in the persistence of HBV cccDNA in hepatocytes despite the long-term suppression of HBV replication by treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The need for development of novel therapies to eliminate HBV cccDNA is urgent; however, HBV research is hampered by a lack of appropriate in vitro infectious models.

Recently, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) was reported to be an entry receptor for HBV, and overexpression of NTCP in hepatoma cell lines rendered them susceptible to HBV infection5. However, hepatoma cell lines lack a number of cellular pathways, including innate immune responses, compared with normal primary hepatocytes6,7. Of note, IFN-α-related innate immune responses are especially important for HBV elimination from host cells. In contrast to hepatoma cell lines, primary human hepatocytes used as host cells for productive HBV infection are without such problems8,9. However, the availability of human hepatocytes is limited, because long-term culture is difficult and genetic modification of target genes in these cells is also unavailable. Moreover, the supply of primary human hepatocytes is limited because of donor shortage, and the metabolic functions of such cells are rapidly lost in vitro10,11.

Human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are somatic cells genetically reprogrammed to be pluripotent by the transient expression of genes important for maintaining the properties of embryonic stem cells. Human iPS cells have the potential for differentiation into hepatocyte lineages12. Utilization of iPS cells as a model of HBV infection would have several substantial advantages compared with primary hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines, such as the potential for unlimited expansion and similarity of biological characteristics to normal hepatocytes. Moreover, the influence of the maturity of host cells on the infectivity and life cycle of HBV and specific gene functions in the host’s interactions with HBV can be evaluated using iPS-derived hepatocyte lineages. However, to date, no report has demonstrated the successful HBV infection of iPS-derived hepatic cell lines that have proliferated over the long term.

The aims of this study were to develop appropriate infectious models of HBV using iPS-derived hepatocyte lineages, including immature proliferating hepatic progenitor-like cell lines (iPS-HPCs) and differentiated hepatocyte-like cells (iPS-Heps), and to evaluate the interaction between HBV and such host cells. Here, we demonstrated that human iPS-derived hepatic cells, especially iPS-derived hepatic progenitor-like cell lines overexpressing NTCP (iPS-HPC-NTCP), can be used as a model for HBV persistence, and that these cells maintain innate immune responses against HBV, which is partially lacking in hepatoma cell lines.

Results

Expression of an entry receptor for HBV in iPS-HPC lines

Human iPS cell lines were differentiated into hepatic lineage using 4-step protocol as previously described12 with some modifications (sequential addition of activin A, basic fibroblast growth factor + bone morphogenetic protein 4, hepatocyte growth factor, and oncostatin M). Human iPS-HPCs were established from FACS-sorted CD13+CD133+ cells of the above-mentioned 3rd step (after addition of hepatocyte growth factor), which were cloned onto feeder cells13. CD13+CD133+ iPS-HPC lines established from iPS cells formed large colonies and were stably cultured on feeder cells for >3 months. These cells expressed the hepatoblast markers, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α), α-fetoprotein (AFP), cytokeratin-7 (CK7) and albumin (ALB) as previously described (Fig. 1a)13. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of cholangiocyte marker in iPS-HPCs, such as sex determining region Y-box 9, was higher than that in iPS-Heps. On the other hand, the expression of hepatocyte markers in iPS-HPCs, such as transthyretin, α1-antitrypsin, tyrosine aminotransferase, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP3A7, apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B, were lower than those in iPS-Heps (Fig. 1b). Expression of NTCP was >100-fold higher in iPS-HPCs compared with that of hepatoma cell lines (Huh7 and HepG2, Fig. 1c). Immunostaining analysis showed that iPS-HPCs produced NTCP (Fig. 1d).

Figure 1
iPS-HPCs express hepatoblast markers and HBV receptor.

HBV infection of iPS-HPCs

To determine whether HBV can infect iPS-HPCs, infection by recombinant HBV expressing luciferase, NanoLuc (HBV/NL)14 was tested (Fig. 2a). The luciferase activity in iPS-HPCs infected with HBV/NL was significantly higher compared with naïve HepG2 that are nonpermissive for HBV (Fig. 2b, left panel). The luciferase activity in iPS-HPCs was significantly increased by treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fig. 2b, right panel).

Figure 2
iPS-HPCs are susceptible to HBV infection and produce infectious HBV particles.

Next, to investigate whether the HBV infection in iPS-HPCs depends on NTCP expression, knockdown of NTCP in iPS-HPCs was analyzed. NTCP expression in iPS-HPCs transfected with siRNA against NTCP was significantly decreased relative to that with control siRNA (Fig. 2c, left panel). The luciferase activity in iPS-HPCs transfected with siRNA against NTCP was significantly decreased relative to that with control siRNA after infection of HBV/NL (Fig. 2c, right panel), indicating that the HBV infection in iPS-HPCs depends on NTCP expression.

We investigated the infectivity of HBV derived from HepG2.2.15.7 cells, subcloned from HepG2.2.15 cells, which exhibited the highest HBV replication levels among the established subclones15. The concentrations of HBe-antigen (HBeAg) in the culture supernatant of HBV-infected iPS-HPCs gradually increased from day 7 to day 13, and HBV cccDNA was detected in iPS-HPCs at day 13 after infection (Fig. 2d). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that expression levels of the hepatic maturation markers, CYP3A4, CYP3A7, CYP7A1 and ALB were significantly lower in iPS-HPCs than in differentiated iPS-Heps (supplementary Fig. 1). Moreover, immunostaining analysis revealed that HBcore-antigen (HBcAg) was detected in AFP positive iPS-HPCs (Fig. 2e). Taken together, these data indicated that iPS-HPCs at a relatively immature stage of hepatic differentiation can be infected with HBV in vitro.

Production of infectious HBV particles from iPS-HPCs

To assess whether iPS-HPCs can produce infectious particles of HBV, plasmids expressing the HBV genome were transfected into iPS-HPCs. The infectivity of culture supernatants derived from iPS-HPCs transfected with HBV/NL plasmids was tested using HepG2-NTCP and naïve HepG2 (Fig. 2f). iPS-HPCs derived HBV produced luciferase activity in HepG2-NTCP but not naïve HepG2 (Fig. 2g), indicating that iPS-HPCs can produce infectious HBV particles.

Innate immune responses of iPS-HPCs against HBV

To investigate the interaction between host iPS-HPCs and HBV, responses of iPS-HPC to exogenous IFN-α stimulation were analyzed by immunoblot analysis. STAT1 was phosphorylated and increased STAT2 and IRF9 levels were detected in iPS-HPCs treated with IFN-α in a time-dependent manner, indicating that molecules in the IFN-α signaling cascade were activated in iPS-HPCs (Fig. 3a). Moreover, quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), MxA, ISG15, and PKR, in iPS-HPCs treated with IFN-α was significantly increased compared with HepG2-NTCP (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
iPS-HPCs respond to IFN stimulation.

To verify the innate immune responses of iPS-HPCs against HBV, the effect of IFN-α on the viral production in iPS-HPCs was investigated. The plasmids expressing 1.2-fold HBV DNA genome, D-IND60, were transfected into iPS-HPCs treated with compounds (Fig. 3c). The copy numbers of HBV DNA in iPS-HPCs treated with lamivudine (LMV), tenofovir (TFV) or IFN-α was significantly decreased compared with non-treat controls (Fig. 3d, left panel). The concentration of HBs-antigen (HBsAg) in the culture supernatant derived from iPS-HPCs treated with IFN-α was also significantly decreased compared with controls. The effect of IFN-α on the reduction of HBsAg concentration was recovered by the addition of Janus-kinase inhibitor I (JAKi) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3d, right panel). These results demonstrated that iPS-HPCs can respond to anti-viral IFN-α stimulation.

HBV infection of differentiated iPS-Heps

To investigate the efficiency of HBV infectivity in mature host cells, we compared the ability of HBV infection in immature iPS-HPC lines and differentiated iPS-Heps that were cultured by 4-step protocol (after addition of oncostatin M)12. Immunostaining analysis showed that iPS-Heps clearly produced both HNF4α and ALB (Fig. 4a). The expression level of NTCP in iPS-Heps was significantly higher than in iPS-HPCs (Fig. 4b). To verify the responses of differentiated iPS-Heps against IFN-α, the expression of IFN-stimulated genes in iPS-Heps were examined by quantitative RT-PCR. Expressions of MxA, ISG15, and PKR in iPS-Heps treated with IFN-α were also significantly increased (Fig. 4c). An infection assay using HBV derived from HepG2.2.15.7 demonstrated that HBeAg concentrations in the culture supernatant derived from iPS-Heps gradually increased and were significantly higher than in iPS-HPCs (Fig. 4d, upper panel). Immunostaining analysis showed that HBcAg production was clearly detected in iPS-Heps (Fig. 4d, lower panel). The expression of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), copy numbers of HBV cccDNA, concentrations of HBsAg, and HBV DNA copy numbers in the culture supernatant derived from iPS-Heps were significantly increased relative to iPS-HPCs (Fig. 4e). These data indicated that the efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-Heps was higher than in iPS-HPCs.

Figure 4
Differentiated iPS-Heps are susceptible to HBV infection.

Responses of iPS-Heps against anti-viral drugs for HBV

Responses of iPS-Heps against several types of anti-viral drugs for HBV were tested using the HBV infection assay (Fig. 4f, left panel). The expression of pgRNA and the concentration of supernatant HBV DNA in iPS-Heps infected with HBV were significantly decreased in cells treated with PreS1 peptide, IFN-α, or TFV compared with non-treated iPS-Heps, indicating that HBV infection in iPS-Heps was suppressed by these anti-viral drugs (Fig. 4f, right panel).

NTCP dependency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs

The efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs was low relative to iPS-Heps (Fig. 4), and depended on the expression level of NTCP (Fig. 2c). To investigate whether the efficiency of HBV infection was enhanced by NTCP expression, we established iPS-HPCs that overexpressed NTCP (iPS-HPC-NTCP). Basal expression of NTCP in iPS-HPC-NTCP without doxycycline (Dox) was similar to the parent iPS-HPCs. Dox treatment dose-dependently increased NTCP expression levels in iPS-HPC-NTCP (Fig. 5a, left panel). Immunostaining showed that Dox treatment increased NTCP protein production (Fig. 5a, right panel). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that hepatic maturation marker expression levels in iPS-HPC-NTCP were unchanged by supplementation of Dox alone (supplementary Fig. 2a). Hepatic maturation of iPS-HPC-NTCP was not inhibited by NTCP overexpression or Dox treatment (supplementary Fig. 2b).

Figure 5
HBV infection in iPS-HPCs is augmented by overexpression of NTCP.

Infection assay of HBV/NL revealed that luciferase activity in iPS-HPC-NTCP was dose-dependently increased by Dox (Fig. 5b). An infection assay using HepG2.2.15.7-derived HBV showed that pgRNA expression, HBV cccDNA copy numbers, concentrations of HBeAg, HBsAg, and HBV DNA copy numbers in the culture supernatant derived from iPS-HPC-NTCP were significantly and dose-dependently increased by Dox (Fig. 5c). Immunostaining showed HBcAg production in iPS-HPC-NTCP (Fig. 5d). Thus, the expression level of NTCP is an essential factor for the efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs.

The responses of iPS-HPC-NTCP to several types of anti-viral drugs for HBV were tested by an HBV-infection assay. pgRNA expression was significantly decreased in iPS-HPC-NTCP treated with PreS1 peptide or IFN-α (Fig. 5e, left panel). Supernatant HBV DNA copy numbers were significantly decreased in iPS-HPC-NTCP treated with PreS1 peptide, IFN-α, or TFV (Fig. 5e, right panel).

Long-term persistence of HBV cccDNA in host iPS-HPC lines

To determine whether HBV cccDNA showed long-term persistence, iPS-HPC-NTCP were infected with HBV in the presence or absence of JAKi and passaged repeatedly on feeder cells for 52 days, after which HBV cccDNA was analyzed. The expression of ISGs in iPS-HPC-NTCP was induced by IFN-α as well as parent iPS-HPCs (supplementary Fig. 3). Copy numbers of cccDNA decreased during cell division by segregation of cccDNA16. After 5 passages of iPS-HPC-NTCP (52 days of culture), HBV cccDNA was detected in iPS-HPC-NTCP treated with vehicle alone and JAKi, and cccDNA copy numbers per cell were significantly higher in cells with JAKi relative to vehicle alone (Fig. 5f). These results demonstrated that HBV cccDNA persisted in iPS-HPC-NTCP for a long term, and suggested that suppression of JAK-mediated innate immune response is associated with persistence of HBV cccDNA in vitro.

Discussion

This study provides the first evidence that iPS-HPC lines can be utilized for an experimental model of HBV infection and virus-host interactions. iPS-HPCs, purified as a CD13+133+ population from hepatoblast-like cells derived from iPS cells, were stably cultured for a long period and maintained hepatic progenitor phenotypes (Fig. 1). These cells were susceptible to HBV infection and produced HBV infectious particles (Fig. 2). Moreover, iPS-HPCs responded to IFN-α stimulation, and the induction of ISGs was significantly higher compared with hepatoma cell lines (Fig. 3). One advantage of iPS-HPCs as host cells for HBV is their ability to maintain a stable hepatic cell phenotype during long-term culture in contrast to iPS-Heps. In addition, FACS sorting allows the isolation of a homogenous population of iPS-HPCs, whereas iPS-Heps are a relatively heterogeneous population containing contaminating cells such as mesenchymal cells that spontaneously differentiate from iPS cells. A previous report showed that iPS-derived hepatocyte lineages were susceptible to HBV when they differentiated from hepatoblast-like cells to hepatocyte-like cells17. Our data indicated that the efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs was significantly lower compared with iPS-Heps (Fig. 4) as previously reported17. However, in contrast to that report, our data clearly showed that iPS-HPCs in the hepatoblast-stage exhibited HBV infectivity. The discrepancy might be explained by the stable phenotype of our iPS-HPC lines and high sensitivity infection assay using HBV/NL.

To overcome the low efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs, we focused on NTCP expression. A previous report indicated NTCP is a key receptor for HBV infection because hepatoma cells that lacked HBV infectivity were infected with HBV when they overexpressed NTCP. The expression levels of NTCP were approximately 1 × 104 and 1 × 103 times higher in primary hepatocytes and differentiated HepaRG, respectively, relative to hepatoma cells such as Huh7 or HepG25. The expression levels of NTCP in HepG2-NTCP were also approximately 1 × 104 times higher than HepG218. The expression levels of NTCP in iPS-HPCs, iPS-Heps, and iPS-HPC-NTCP were approximately 1 × 102, 1 × 103, and 1 × 104 times higher relative to hepatoma cells, respectively (Figs 1c, ,4b4b and and5a).5a). These data suggest HBV infectivity is predominantly correlated with NTCP expression in vitro. However, the infection efficiency of iPS-HPC-NTCP was not higher than iPS-Hep (Fig. 5c,d), suggesting HBV infection might also depend on another factor/receptor, such as the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), a candidate HBV receptor19,20. Our data showed that ASGPR expression in iPS-Hep was significantly increased compared with iPS-HPC (supplementary Fig. 4); however, HBV infection efficiency in iPS-HPCs overexpressing ASGPR was similar to control iPS-HPCs (data not shown). Taken together, our data strongly suggested that NTCP expression was the most important factor for host cell HBV infectivity in vitro.

Innate immune responses are important for the eradication of HBV21,22. NTCP overexpression in hepatoma cell lines renders them susceptible to HBV infection; however, hepatoma cells are defective for many cellular pathways associated with type 1 interferon related innate immune response6,7. Our data (Figs 3 and and4c,4c, and supplementary Fig. 3) and those of others23 showed the innate immune system was intact in hepatic cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Therefore, a cell bank containing iPS cell lines with wide genetic variation could help elucidate the virus-host interaction in chronic HBV infection and aid drug development for HBV infection.

Human primary hepatocytes are available for modeling HBV infection in vitro. However, it is impossible to use primary hepatocytes for large-scale drug screening because of the donor shortage and their lack of proliferation in vitro. Human iPS cell lines could be established from donors with genetic variations, and our strategy for the HBV infection model requires no human liver sample. Therefore, iPS-HPC and iPS-HPC-NTCP could be utilized for drug screening, studying virus-host interactions, and genetic modification in host cells in the future.

We demonstrated that immature iPS-HPC lines supported the HBV life cycle although HBV is generally considered to infect only mature hepatocytes. Currently it is unknown why HBV cccDNA persist in mature hepatocytes even though they are constantly proliferating, and HBV replication can be inhibited long-term by nucleos(t)ide analogues. Upon injurious conditions, unique populations of epithelial cells with an immature phenotype, termed liver progenitor cells, emerge and expand, and may contribute to tissue regeneration24. Our data suggest that HBV may persist in hepatic progenitor-like cells over long periods. Further study regarding the association between hepatic cell differentiation and HBV life cycle is required to understand the mechanism of persistent infection.

In conclusion, human iPS-derived hepatic cells, especially iPS-HPC-NTCP, support the HBV life cycle and can be used as a model for HBV infection. These cells maintain innate immune responses against HBV compared with hepatoma cell lines. This study provides the first evidence that iPS-HPCs can be utilized as an experimental model to investigate HBV-host interactions, develop novel therapies, and determine the association between HBV persistence and cell differentiation.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

A human iPS cell line, RIKEN 2F (a daughter cell line of RCB0197 HUC-Fm that was established from Japanese male umbilical cord fibroblasts reprogrammed by the overexpression of Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc transduced by retroviral vectors) was cultured as described previously25. RIKEN 2F cell line was differentiated into the hepatic lineage using a 4-step protocol as previously described12 with some modifications. Briefly, semi-confluent human iPS cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 2% B27 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were cultured with 100 ng/mL recombinant human activin A (PeproTech, Rocky, NJ, USA) on days 0–4, 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) and 20 ng/mL recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 4 (PeproTech) on days 5–8, and 40 ng/mL recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor (PeproTech) on days 9–12. Then they were cultured in a hepatocyte culture media bullet kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and stimulated with 20 ng/mL recombinant human oncostatin M (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) on days 13–16. Cells cultured by the 4-step protocol were termed iPS-derived hepatocyte-like cells (iPS-Heps).

CD13+CD133+ cells prepared according to the above protocol on day 12 were sorted by FACS and were cloned onto feeder cells, which were cultured and passaged as iPS-derived hepatic progenitor-like cells (iPS-HPCs)13,26. iPS-HPCs were cultured as previously described13. HepG2 overexpressing NTCP (HepG2-NTCP [C4])27, HepG2, and Huh7 were used as control cells.

Establishment of iPS-HPC lines overexpressing NTCP

We constructed a self-contained, drug-inducible expression vector based on the PiggyBac transposon28. This vector constitutively expresses a neomycin resistance gene and an rtTA transactivator element, which mediates Dox-dependent activation of cDNA cassettes controlled by the tetO promoter. Activation of gene expression in response to Dox may be indirectly monitored by co-incident green fluorescent protein activation. Using the Gateway cloning technique, we produced a derivative vector expressing human NTCP. The Tet-NTCP vector was transfected together with PiggyBac transposase into the RIKEN-2F iPS cell line and was selected using media containing G418 for 3 days to generate pooled 2F iPSNTCP cells containing genomic transposon integrations. The resultant 2F iPSNTCP cells were differentiated into the hepatic lineage as described above, and the CD13+CD133+ fraction derived from NTCP-iPS cells was sorted and cloned onto mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells, which were used as iPS-HPC-NTCP host cells.

Preparation and infection of HBV

HBV used in the infection study was mainly derived from the culture supernatant of HepG2.2.15.7 cells, subcloned from HepG2.2.15 cells, which exhibited the highest HBV replication levels among the established subclones15. HBV was prepared and infected as described29. Host cells were infected with HBV at 1.8 × 104 genome equivalent/cell. Cells were treated with 3% DMSO (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before infection and infected in the presence of 4% PEG 8000 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 37 °C for 16 h as previously described27,30. For inhibition assays using PreS1 peptide, 100 nM PreS1 peptide was added into the medium 2 hours before infection29,31. At the time of HBV infection, 1,000 IU/ml IFN-α and 1 μM TFV were concomitantly added into the medium.

Infection assay using HBV expressing reporter gene

A recombinant HBV/NL was produced by cotransfecting a plasmid containing a 1.2-fold HBV genome carrying the NanoLuc gene with a plasmid bearing a packaging-defective 1.2-fold HBV genome as previously described14. Infection was performed as described above. Activity of NanoLuc was quantified using the NanoGlo luciferase assay system (Promega) and GloMax discover system (Promega). Cell viability was quantified using the MTS assay kit (Promega).

Knockdown of NTCP

Human NTCP-targeted or control siRNAs (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were transfected into the cells at a final concentration of 30 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and were cultured for 72 hours. Then, the cells were infected with HBV/NL, and activity of NanoLuc and cell viability were quantified as described above.

Assay for innate immune response against HBV production

Replication of HBV can be mimicked by transfection of plasmids expressing the HBV genome into hepatic host cells32. Briefly, iPS-HPCs were enriched from feeder mouse embryonic fibroblasts using feeder removal microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and a magnetic cell sorter (Miltenyi Biotec), and seeded onto collagen-coated dishes. Host iPS-HPCs were transfected with 1 μg plasmids expressing the HBV genome, D-IND60, in 100 μL Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using ViaFect transfection reagent complex (Promega), and were cultured for 3 days. Then, 1 μM LMV, 1 μM TFV, and 1,000 IU/ml IFN-α were added to the medium for drug inhibition assays. For IFN-α inhibition assays, 1,000 IU/ml IFN-α with or without 0.5–2.0 μM JAKi (Pyridone 6) was added to the medium.

Assay for production of infectious HBV particles

For the transfection of plasmids expressing the HBV genome, iPS-HPCs were enriched and seeded as described above. Host iPS-HPCs were transfected with HBV/NL plasmids, and culture supernatants were collected at 72 hours after transfection. HBV/NL was enriched from culture supernatants using precipitation with 10% PEG8000 and 2.3% NaCl, and the concentrated viral solution was infected in HepG2-NTCP or HepG2.

Statistics

GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to calculate the standard deviation (SD) and statistical significance between samples (two-tailed Student’s t test); p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In all graphs, bars represent the mean ± SD of three or four separate experiments.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kaneko, S. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatic cell lines as a new model for host interaction with hepatitis B virus. Sci. Rep. 6, 29358; doi: 10.1038/srep29358 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information:

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Y. Nakamura for the gift of human iPS cell line RIKEN 2F and Prof. Knut Woltjen for the gift of the expression vector PB-TAG_ERN (KW-200). We also thank Y. Yamazaki (Division of Stem Cell Therapy, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo), Y. Nishimura-Sakurai, F. Goto, and A. Sato (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for excellent technical assistance. We thank Y. Tanaka (Department of Virology and Liver unit, Nagoya City University) for providing the plasmid, D-IND60. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (15K08988, 15K08989, 15K15285, 25293169, and 25670366), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan (H24-Bsou-Kanen-Ippan-012 and 004), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (15fk0310013h0004), and Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.

Footnotes

Author Contributions S. Kaneko performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S. Kakinuma and Y. Asahina planned this study, wrote the manuscript, and organized the experiments. A.K. provided several cell lines and discussed about the strategy of this study. M. Miyoshi, T.T. and S.N. discussed about the methodology of this study and assisted cell culture. Y. Asano, H. Nagata, S.O., F.K.-K., M. Murakawa, Y.I., M.N. and S.A. discussed about the methodology and assisted expression analyses. H. Nishitsuji, S.U. and K.S. provided the HBV/NL constructs. H. Nakauchi, M.I., K.W. and T.W. provided several materials and discussed about the strategy of this study. M.W. discussed precisely about the strategy of this study, and organized the staff for this study.

References

  • Liang T. J. et al. . Present and future therapies of hepatitis B: From discovery to cure. Hepatology 62, 1893–1908 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Protzer U., Maini M. K. & Knolle P. A. Living in the liver: hepatic infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 201–213 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Zoulim F. Hepatitis B virus resistance to antiviral drugs: where are we going? Liver Int. 31 Suppl 1, 111–116 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wursthorn K. et al. . Peginterferon alpha-2b plus adefovir induce strong cccDNA decline and HBsAg reduction in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 44, 675–684 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Yan H. et al. . Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife 1, e00049 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li K., Chen Z., Kato N., Gale M. Jr. & Lemon S. M. Distinct poly(I-C) and virus-activated signaling pathways leading to interferon-beta production in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 16739–16747 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Tnani M. & Bayard B. A. Evidence for IRF-1-dependent gene expression deficiency in interferon unresponsive HepG2 cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1451, 59–72 (1999). [PubMed]
  • Ochiya T. et al. . An in vitro system for infection with hepatitis B virus that uses primary human fetal hepatocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 1875–1879 (1989). [PubMed]
  • Galle P. R. et al. . In vitro experimental infection of primary human hepatocytes with hepatitis B virus. Gastroenterology 106, 664–673 (1994). [PubMed]
  • Sivaraman A. et al. . A microscale in vitro physiological model of the liver: predictive screens for drug metabolism and enzyme induction. Curr. Drug. Metab. 6, 569–591 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Hewitt N. J. et al. . Primary hepatocytes: current understanding of the regulation of metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, and pharmaceutical practice for the use of hepatocytes in metabolism, enzyme induction, transporter, clearance, and hepatotoxicity studies. Drug. Metab. Rev. 39, 159–234 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Si-Tayeb K. et al. . Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology 51, 297–305 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yanagida A., Ito K., Chikada H., Nakauchi H. & Kamiya A. An in vitro expansion system for generation of human iPS cell-derived hepatic progenitor-like cells exhibiting a bipotent differentiation potential. PLoS One 8, e67541 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nishitsuji H. et al. . Novel reporter system to monitor early stages of the hepatitis B virus life cycle. Cancer Sci. 106, 1616–1624 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ogura N., Watashi K., Noguchi T. & Wakita T. Formation of covalently closed circular DNA in Hep38.7-Tet cells, a tetracycline inducible hepatitis B virus expression cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 452, 315–321 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Zhang Y. Y. et al. . Single-cell analysis of covalently closed circular DNA copy numbers in a hepadnavirus-infected liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12372–12377 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Shlomai A. et al. . Modeling host interactions with hepatitis B virus using primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocellular systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12193–12198 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Okuyama-Dobashi K. et al. . Hepatitis B virus efficiently infects non-adherent hepatoma cells via human sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. Sci. Rep. 5, 17047 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Owada T. et al. . Interaction between desialylated hepatitis B virus and asialoglycoprotein receptor on hepatocytes may be indispensable for viral binding and entry. J. Viral. Hepat. 13, 11–18 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Zhang X. et al. . Asialoglycoprotein receptor interacts with the preS1 domain of hepatitis B virus in vivo and in vitro. Arch. Virol. 156, 637–645 (2011). [PubMed]
  • Lucifora J. et al. . Control of Hepatitis B Virus Replication by Innate Response of HepaRG Cells. Hepatology 51, 63–72 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Belloni L. et al. . IFN-alpha inhibits HBV transcription and replication in cell culture and in humanized mice by targeting the epigenetic regulation of the nuclear cccDNA minichromosome. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 529–537 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ignatius Irudayam J. et al. . Characterization of type I interferon pathway during hepatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells and hepatitis C virus infection. Stem. Cell. Res. 15, 354–364 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Miyajima A., Tanaka M. & Itoh T. Stem/Progenitor Cells in Liver Development, Homeostasis, Regeneration, and Reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 14, 561–574 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Fujioka T., Shimizu N., Yoshino K., Miyoshi H. & Nakamura Y. Establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells from human neonatal tissues. Hum. Cell 23, 113–118 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Kakinuma S. et al. . Analyses of cell surface molecules on hepatic stem/progenitor cells in mouse fetal liver. J. Hepatol. 51, 127–138 (2009). [PubMed]
  • Iwamoto M. et al. . Evaluation and identification of hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors using HepG2 cells overexpressing a membrane transporter NTCP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 443, 808–813 (2014). [PubMed]
  • Woltjen K. et al. . piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458, 766–770 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watashi K. et al. . Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha trigger restriction of hepatitis B virus infection via a cytidine deaminase activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). J. Biol. Chem. 288, 31715–31727 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schulze A., Mills K., Weiss T. S. & Urban S. Hepatocyte polarization is essential for the productive entry of the hepatitis B virus. Hepatology 55, 373–383 (2012). [PubMed]
  • Watashi K. et al. . Cyclosporin A and its analogs inhibit hepatitis B virus entry into cultured hepatocytes through targeting a membrane transporter, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). Hepatology 59, 1726–1737 (2014). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sugiyama M. et al. . Influence of hepatitis B virus genotypes on the intra- and extracellular expression of viral DNA and antigens. Hepatology 44, 915–924 (2006). [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group