|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Sorting of luminal and membrane proteins into phagosomes is critical for the immune function of this organelle. However, little is known about the mechanisms that contribute to the spatiotemporal regulation of this process. Here, we investigated the role of the proneurotrophin receptor sortilin during phagosome maturation and mycobacterial killing. We show that this receptor is acquired by mycobacteria-containing phagosomes via interactions with the adaptor proteins AP-1 and GGAs. Interestingly, the phagosomal association of sortilin is critical for the delivery of acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) and required for efficient phagosome maturation. Macrophages from Sort1−/− mice are less efficient in restricting the growth of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. In vivo, Sort1−/− mice showed a substantial increase in cellular infiltration of neutrophils in their lungs and higher bacterial burden after infection with M. tuberculosis. Altogether, sortilin defines a pathway required for optimal intracellular mycobacteria control and lung inflammation in vivo.
The process of phagosome maturation is central for the development of the innate and adaptive immune response1,2. In this process, different subsets of endosomal and lysosomal components are delivered sequentially into the phagosome in a very organized manner. However, little is known about the mechanisms that contribute to the spatiotemporal sorting of luminal and membrane proteins into phagosomes3. Many intracellular pathogens have developed mechanisms to hijack the normal trafficking of phagosomes and survive within host cells4,5. A subpopulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that it is phagocytosed by macrophages arrests phagosome maturation impairing bacterial targeting to phagolysosomes, a process that contributes to disease6,7,8. However, a clear mechanistic understanding of the dynamics of intracellular M. tuberculosis infection and how host defenses are organized against this pathogen is missing.
One process required for the host defense in phagocytes involves the intracellular trafficking of hydrolases to the phagosome from several organelles. In this regard, sortilin, also known as neurotensin receptor 3 (NTR3), is a transmembrane receptor that transports lysosomal proteins from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) into lysosomes, as an alternative route to mannose-6-phosphate receptors (MPRs)9,10,11. Sortilin consists of a large luminal domain, a single transmembrane segment and a short C-terminal cytosolic tail. The luminal region possesses a single Vps10 domain12 and the cytosolic tail of 53 amino acid residues contains motifs involved in the anterograde and retrograde transport between the Golgi complex and endosomes, similar to the corresponding cytosolic domain of the cation-independent-MPR (CI-MPR)10,13,14.
Adaptor proteins are implicated in the transport of sortilin and its cargo from the TGN to endosomes. The multimeric adaptor protein AP-1 and the monomeric gamma-ear-containing ADP ribosylation factor (ARF)-binding proteins (GGAs) interact with the cytosolic tail of sortilin10. AP-1/GGAs interactions with sortilin are essential for the transport of the receptor-ligand via clathrin-coated vesicles to endosomes10,13,14,15. Once the cargo is released, the retrograde transport of sortilin from endosomes to the TGN depends on its interaction with the Vps35 subunit of the retromer complex13 or palmitoylation in the cysteine 783 of its cytosolic tail16.
There is growing evidence that sortilin could have a function in both the innate and adaptive immune response. The trafficking of at least two lysosomal proteins is partially regulated by sortilin: prosaposin17 and acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase)18. Proteins of this family are antibacterial19,20, required for a selective degradation of membrane lipids21,22, phagosome maturation23, and antigen presentation24. Sortilin is up regulated in macrophages during the killing of mycobacteria25 and is required for the delivery of both prosaposin and ASMase from the Golgi complex to phagosomes in a route that is independent from the delivery of enzymes such as cathepsin D26. Sortilin has also been implicated in the secretion of IFN-γ and granzyme A by T and NK cells27. Sortilin is highly expressed in monocytes and macrophages26,28. However, the intracellular function of this sorting receptor in phagocytes during the immune response to infection with intracellular bacteria is not known.
Here, we investigated the function of sortilin in macrophages during infection with M. tuberculosis. We show that sortilin is acquired by mycobacteria-containing phagosomes via interactions with the adaptor proteins AP-1 and GGAs. The phagosomal association of sortilin is critical for the delivery of ASMase and required for efficient phagosome maturation. More importantly, macrophages lacking sortilin are not able to restrict the growth of both M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. In vivo, M. tuberculosis burden was significantly higher in Sort1−/− than in Sort1+/+ mice and Sort1−/− animals showed an increase in lung infiltration of neutrophils and pathology. Altogether, our data indicate that sortilin is a new component of the phagosome maturation pathway and the killing machinery of macrophages and impacts on lung inflammation in vivo.
Sortilin contributes to the delivery of specific lysosomal proteins from the Golgi complex to latex bead phagosomes26, but its function in mycobacteria-containing phagosome maturation is not known. We first analyzed if sortilin is recruited into mycobacteria-containing phagosomes. For that, macrophages were infected with M. bovis BCG–DsRed (BCG-DsRed) or M. tuberculosis H37Rv-EGFP (Mtb-EGFP) and sortilin was detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Quantitative analysis showed a strong association of endogenous sortilin with BCG-DsRed-containing phagosomes in RAW 264.7 macrophages (Fig. 1A,B). Endogenous sortilin was also associated with Mtb-EGFP-containing phagosomes in primary bone marrow-derived murine macrophages (BMM, Fig. 1C,D) and with BCG-DsRed-containing phagosomes in THP-1 human macrophages (Fig. 1E,F). The fluorescent intensity profiles along the phagosomes in the different types of macrophages were determined, confirming that sortilin was recruited to phagosomes containing M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. By live cell imaging, we analyzed the kinetic of sortilin association with phagosomes at early time points (see material and methods). Sort/WT-EYFP was associated with BCG-DsRed-containing phagosomes after 1min of internalization and remained associated with the phagosomes for at least 15min (Fig. 1G,H, Movie-S1). After 15minutes, Sort/WT-EYFP dynamically associated with phagosomes, but in transient interactions involving often kiss and run events (data not show).
We then investigated the sorting motifs that mediate the delivery of sortilin to mycobacterial phagosomes (Fig. S2A). In macrophages, Sort/WT-EYFP localized in the Golgi complex and the endosomal fraction as reported before26. A mutant in the GGA/AP-1 binding motif that mediates anterograde transport from the TGN, Sort/829LL-EYFP was more pronounced associated with the cis-Golgi and TGN (Fig. S1), and less with endocytic structures (EEA-1 positive, Fig. S1). In contrast, two mutants in the residues C783S or 787FLV, implicated in the retromer-dependent endosome to TGN retrieval (Sort/C783S-EYFP and Sort/787FLV-EYFP) were less associated with the Golgi complex and more associated with endosomal structures (Fig. S1). As expected, a mutant in the endocytosis internalization motif Y792A/L795A (Sort/792YL-EYFP) remained associated with plasma membrane and association with the Golgi complex and endosomes was very low (Fig. S1).
Next, we analyzed the association of the different mutants to mycobacteria-containing phagosomes in fixed cells (see material and methods). Sort/WT-EYFP was associated with phagosomes (Mean=212.5±14.47). The association of the mutant in the anterograde transport Sort/829LL-EYFP with mycobacteria-containing phagosomes was significantly lower (Mean=155.8±9.771). Moreover, the association of the mutant in the retrograde transport Sort/C783S-EYFP with phagosomes was also reduced (Mean=154.3±10.64, Fig. 1J). The association of the Sort/787FLV-EYFP and Sort/792YL-EYFP mutants with phagosomes was not affected (Fig. 1J). These results indicate that the recruitment of sortilin into mycobacterial phagosomes was impaired in cells expressing mutants compromised in both anterograde and retrograde transport. Importantly, the internalization of the bacteria was not affected by the expression of the sortilin mutants (Fig. S2B) and there were not significant differences in the expression level of the different mutants in the transfected cells (Fig. S3). Thus, sortilin receptor or vesicles carrying sortilin are recruited early during internalization into mycobacteria-containing phagosomes and this association partially depends on interactions of sortilin with both GGAs/AP-1 and the retromer complex.
Sortilin is transcriptionally up-regulated during the process of mycobacterial killing in macrophages25, thus we sought to analyze the role of sortilin during this process. We observed a significant decrease in the number of mycobacterial phagosomes positive for LAMP-2 in bone marrow macrophages (BMM) from Sort1−/− mice compared to mycobacterial phagosomes in Sort1+/+ BMM (Mean=450.5±47.29 vs. 303.4±31.83, respectively) after 2h of infection (Figs 2A and S4A). No differences were observed in the percentage of infected cells at the different time points (Fig. S4B). However, the total fluorescence intensity of BCG-DsRed per cell increased in BMM from Sort1−/− mice after 2h of infection compared to BMM from Sort1+/+ (Fig. 2B). Next, we evaluated the intracellular survival of mycobacteria in BMM from Sort1+/+ and Sort1−/− mice by counting colony-forming units (CFU). After 24h of infection, the total CFU of mycobacteria was 190.77% higher in Sort1−/− macrophages than in Sort1+/+ macrophages (Fig. 2C). We concluded that sortilin is required for phagosome maturation and more importantly for mycobacterial growth restriction.
Sortilin regulates a pathway that delivers ASMase to latex-bead phagosomes26. Considering that ASMase plays an important role in the biological function of macrophages and more importantly, in the regulation of phagosome maturation23,29, we investigated if ASMase was present in mycobacterial phagosomes. The expression of the different mutants caused a redistribution of ASMase that was retained in the Golgi complex in cells expressing the anterograde mutant and in endocytic structures in cells expressing the retrograde mutants (Fig. S5). Distribution of ASMase was not affected in cells expressing the internalization mutant Sort/792YL-EYFP (Fig. S5). BMMs from Sort1+/+ or Sort1−/− mice were infected and the association of ASMase with phagosomes was analyzed. The distribution of ASMase was similar in both Sort1+/+ and Sort1−/− macrophages (Fig. 2D). However, a quantitative analysis showed that the association of ASMase was significantly higher in mycobacteria-containing phagosomes from Sort1+/+ compared to Sort1−/− BMM at 1, 6 and 24h of infection (Fig. 2E). These data indicated that sortilin primarily transports ASMase into mycobacterial-containing phagosomes. The expression of the mutant of sortilin with a deletion of the C-terminal dileucine motif (Sort/829LL-EYFP, mutant in the anterograde pathway, Mean=181.4±13.57) and the mutants in the residues affecting the interaction of sortilin with the retromer complex (Sort/C783S-EYFP and Sort/787FLV-EYFP, mutants in retrograde pathway, Mean=156.9±16.33 and 195.1±21.22 respectively) impaired the association of ASMase with mycobacteria-containing phagosomes (Figs 2F and S6). As expected, the mutant in the internalization motif Sort/792YL did not affect ASMase delivery into the phagosome. Taken together, our results indicated that the delivery of ASMase into mycobacterial phagosomes depends on sortilin and its ability to interact with components of GGA/AP-1-mediated anterograde and retromer-mediated retrograde pathways.
To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of sortilin in the maturation of mycobacterial phagosomes, we sought to identify the sorting motif(s) that might have an effect in phagosome maturation. For this, macrophages expressing different mutants in the sortilin cytosolic tail were infected with mycobacteria and labeled for LAMP-2. Notably, the association of LAMP-2 with mycobacteria-containing phagosomes was reduced in cells expressing the mutant deficient in both GGAs/AP-1 and retromer complex interactions. More than 50% of reduction was observed in cells expressing the mutant Sort/829LL-EYFP and Sort/C783S-EYFP compared to EYFP and Sort/WT-EYFP (Fig. 3A,B). This was not due to a general re-localization of LAMP-2 positive compartments (Fig. 3A). We next tested whether the impaired anterograde or retrograde trafficking elicited by the expression of sortilin mutants had an effect in mycobacterial survival. As shown in Fig. 3C, the survival of the bacteria increased in macrophages overexpressing Sort/829LL-EYFP and Sort/C783S-EYFP compared to cells expressing EYFP, suggesting that a normal transport of sortilin in macrophages is required for phagosome maturation and efficient restriction of mycobacterial growth.
Because sortilin was required for the maturation of BCG-containing phagosomes, we tested whether the sortilin-dependent phagosome maturation was required for growth control of the pathogenic strain M. tuberculosis H37Rv. BMM from Sort1+/+ and Sort1−/− mice were infected with Mtb-EGFP at different time points, fixed and the association of ASMase and LAMP-2 with M. tuberculosis-containing phagosomes was examined by fluorescence microscopy. A reduction of ASMase association with M. tuberculosis-containing phagosomes occurred in Sort1−/− compared to Sort1+/+ BMM after 3 and 7 days of infection (Fig. 4A,B). Consistent with previous data (Fig. 2A), the accumulation of the late endosomal marker LAMP-2 in Sort1−/− BMM significantly decreased (Fig. 4C,D). Moreover, treatment of macrophages with desipramine, to deplete ASMase30 increased the survival of M. tuberculosis (Fig. S7), indicating that in mouse macrophages, ASMase is required for M. tuberculosis growth restriction. Next, we assessed whether sortilin had an impact on M. tuberculosis infection. BMM from Sort1−/− mice showed a significant increase in the M. tuberculosis-EGFP fluorescence intensity signal at the single cell level compared with Sort1+/+ macrophages after 7 days of infection (Fig. 4E). However, this parameter was not affected at early time of infection, indicating that the internalization of the bacteria was not affected. After 3 and 7 days of infection, a significant increase in the survival of M. tuberculosis was observed in Sort1−/− macrophages compared to Sort1+/+, as determined by CFU analysis (Fig. 4F). Taken together, our data show that sortilin regulates both the trafficking of ASMase to M. tuberculosis phagosomes and M. tuberculosis growth restriction in macrophages.
To address the role of sortilin in susceptibility to tuberculosis in vivo, we infected Sort1−/− and Sort1+/+ mice with M. tuberculosis H37Rv. Using a low dose infection, mimicking conditions associated with natural aerosol transmission (CFU between 100–200), we identified a modest but significant difference in bacterial load among Sort1−/− and Sort1+/+ mice after 14 and 56 days post-aerosol challenge (Fig. 5A). Additionally, we observed more rapid dissemination into spleens after 28 and 56 days of infection in Sort1−/− mice (Fig. 5B). More importantly, we observed a significant increase in the size of infiltrated areas in the lungs of Sort1−/− mice after different infection times (Fig. 5C,D). This increased pathology correlated with a significantly higher recruitment of neutrophils into the lesions in Sort1−/− mice (Fig. 5E,F). Altogether, our results suggest that sortilin is required to limit bacterial replication by macrophages, and lack of this receptor leads to lung cellular infiltration, neutrophil recruitment and immunopathology in the mouse model of tuberculosis infection.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that a lysosomal receptor deficiency is associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis in the mouse model of infection. Using different macrophages and mycobacteria we demonstrated here a role for the intracellular pool of sortilin in macrophages and in the innate immune response. We previously reported that sortilin is associated with latex bead-containing phagosomes and this association depends on its cytosolic tail26. Here we demonstrated that both GGAs/AP-1 interaction and palmitoylation of the cysteine in the cytosolic tail (necessary for binding to retromer complex) were required for the delivery of sortilin to mycobacterial phagosomes (See model Fig. S8). The cytosolic tail of the sortilin receptor contains sorting signals, which mediate transport from the TGN to endosomes and, after cargo release, the retrieval from endosomes14,31. We observed that sortilin delivery into mycobacterial phagosomes depends on the sortilin interaction with both GGA/AP-1 and the retromer complex. GGA/AP-1 complex is essential for the anterograde trafficking of sortilin10,13,15 and our data indicate that this step is also required for transport to phagosomes. Moreover, palmitoylation of sortilin in the cysteine 783 of its cytosolic tail is necessary for the retrograde trafficking of sortilin via the retromer complex from endosomes to the Golgi complex16. The precise mechanism by which interaction of sortilin with the retromer regulates phagosome maturation and cargo delivery into phagosomes remains to be identified. Interestingly, there is increasing evidence of the contribution of the retromer to phagosome maturation32,33. For example, the Legionella pneumophila Icm/Dot-translocated effector protein RidL is an interacting protein of the retromer complex. This bacterial protein blocks retrograde transport and promotes intracellular replication34.
In order to effectively degrade phagocytosed bacteria within phagolysosomes, hydrolytic enzymes are essential1. We have identified here that sortilin regulates the transport of ASMase to mycobacteria-containing phagosomes and this requires an efficient sortilin trafficking. Although there are likely other enzymes delivered by sortilin into phagosomes, our results are in line with the notion that ASMase is important for the killing of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium35 and Listeria monocytogenes23,36. In another scenario, ASMase could hydrolyze the phagosomal lipid sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphorylcholine, enhancing the fusogenicity of cellular membranes36. Thus, it is likely that a decrease of ASMase will affect mycobacterial killing capacity in the phagosomal compartment by impairing fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes. On the other hand, ASMase contributes to macrophage necrosis in the presence of and excess of TNF-α, through the activation of the ASMase that results in the production of ceramide, an inducer of apoptosis and necrosis. The knockdown of ASMase in the zebrafish model reduced ceramide production and prevented macrophage necroptosis, increasing macrophage microbicidal activity and reducing the M. marinum burdens. Ceramide production occurs in the context of high TNF-α production30. In the light of our results, it is clear that ASMase can have multiple roles during bacterial infections as previously postulated36. On one hand, ASMase could be linked to bacterial infections by modulating host cell death30. On the other hand, ASMase can also affect lysosomal activities or fusogenic properties of intracellular vesicles. Consistent with this notion, ceramide can facilitate killing of pathogenic mycobacteria by promoting the maturation of phagosomes hitherto arrested in the early phagosomal stage37. In agreement with this hypothesis, we also found that sortilin-mediated trafficking modulates phagosome maturation via LAMP-2 accumulation in mycobacterial phagosomes. However, the complete lack of ASMase results in macrophages to become “foamy”, a niche where mycobacteria grow29,38.
The differences in bacterial killing are unlikely to be due to a defect in a general lysosomal function such as a primary defect in critical lysosomal enzymes in late endosomes/lysosomes, as observed in M6PR deficient cells39. The knockout of M6PR in mice is lethal whereas sortilin knockout mice are viable40. This suggests that sortilin regulates a more specific lysosomal-related function in immune cells rather than a general lysosomal function. Moreover, our data is consistent with sortilin being part of a previously reported direct pathway from the Golgi to phagosomes26,41,42,43, that delivers specific proteins required for M. tuberculosis control in macrophages.
Previous reports indicated that cytotoxic T cells and NK cells from Sort1−/− mice appear to have reduced secretion of IFN-γ in cytotoxic T lymphocytes impairing clearance of adenoviruses and increasing Listeria monocytogenes numbers in the spleen of infected mice compared to Sort1+/+,27. We expected a more dramatic effect in M. tuberculosis infected mice given that IFN-γ is a key cytokine for the control of tuberculosis44. However, although there is a difference in IFN-γ release between Sort1+/+ and Sort1−/− mice, there is still significant production of IFN-γ and that is likely sufficient for control of M. tuberculosis27. In addition, we did not observe significant IFN-γ release from splenic or lymph node lymphocytes in Sort1−/− mice after mycobacterial infection (Fig. S9). Our findings suggest a model where the absence of sortilin in macrophages leads to uncontrolled bacterial replication in the lung, which causes increased pathology and neutrophil recruitment into the lesions. Our data also suggest that in vivo, early macrophage control of bacterial growth prevents dissemination of the infection from the lungs to secondary sites. Alternatively, sortilin might have a function in the production of mediators of inflammation and the precise differences and identity of these immune factors remain to be identified. However, during neuroinflammation, sortilin primarily plays a role in the innate rather than adaptive immune response28. Supporting this idea, M. tuberculosis-infected animals show a more severe defect in the innate response and do not succumbs to infection likely due to the development of an adequate adaptive immune response.
Taken together, our results uncover a novel sortilin-dependent pathway by which specific factors such as ASMase and likely other unidentified factors are transported into mycobacterial phagosomes. Association of sortilin with phagosomes leads to phagosome maturation, mycobacterial control and inflammation in vivo.
RAW 264.7 macrophages were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Cat# TIB-71) and maintained in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (D-MEM) with 4.5g/L glucose, 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS, PAA, Austria) and 2mM L-glutamine (PAA, Austria) (full D-MEM medium). Bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) were isolated and maintained as described previously45. Cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. M. bovis bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) str. Pasteur 1173P2 expressing Ds-Red was kindly provided by Dr. Brigitte Gicquel (Pasteur Institute, France). M. tuberculosis H37Rv was kindly provided by Dr. Douglas Young (The Francis Crick Institute, UK). EGFP-expressing M. tuberculosis was generated transforming M. tuberculosis with pML133546. Mycobacteria were grown in roller flasks at 37°C in Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium (Difco Laboratories, USA) containing 0.2% glycerol, 0.05% Tween-80 and supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase supplement (OADC, BD Biosciences, USA) or in Middlebrook 7H10 plates (Difco Laboratories, USA) supplemented with 10% OADC. Sortilin wild type and mutants expression vectors were previously described47.
RAW 267.4 macrophages or BMM from Sort1+/+ and Sort1−/− mice were infected with M. bovis BCG-DsRed or M. tuberculosis-EGFP in full D-MEM medium. A single-bacteria suspension at optical density (OD) 600nm=0.025 was added for 2h of uptake. After cells were washed 3 times with PBS, DMEM medium was added and incubated at different time points. In some experiments, 25μM desipramine (Sigma, USA) was added to induce ASMase degradation (Fig. S7). For THP-1 infections, THP-1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and maintained in complete RPMI Medium with 4.5g/L glucose, 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS, PAA, Austria) and 2mM L-glutamine (PAA, Austria) (full RPMI medium). The day before infection, cells were plated in full RPMI medium plus 50nM of PMA to allow differentiation. The day of infection, cells were washed and a suspension of M. bovis BCG-DsRed in full RPMI medium with optical density (OD) 600nm=0.025 was added for 2h of uptake and 1h of chase. Next, cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence to detect endogenous sortilin using specific antibodies.
Transfection of RAW 264.7 macrophages was performed using Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen, Germany). Briefly, cells were seeded in plates 1 day before the transfection. The day of transfection, cells were washed with PBS and then incubated with the transfection mix for 6h in OptiMEM cell culture medium (Invitrogen, Germany). After incubation, fresh medium containing serum was added. Cells were subsequently used for further studies.
Cells were processed as described before26 and in supplementary material using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). The primary and secondary antibodies used in this work were obtained from the same batches and always utilized at the same dilutions. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-ASMase (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, USA) with a dilution of 1:50 overnight in humid chamber at room temperature, rat anti-LAMP-2 (Hybridoma Bank, Iowa, USA) with a dilution of 1:50 during 2h at room temperature, rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-sortilin (kindly provided by Dr. Claus Petersen, University of Aarhus, Denmark) with a dilution of 1:50 over night in humid chamber at room temperature. Mouse anti-EEA1 (BD Bioscience) with a dilution of 1:50 over night in humid chamber at room temperature, mouse anti-GM130 (BD Bioscience) used with a dilution 1:100, 2h at room temperature and mouse anti-Syntaxin6 (BD Bioscience) with a dilution of 1:50 over night in humid chamber at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used for indirect immunofluorescence were: goat anti-rabbit Alexa633 (dilution 1:600), goat anti-mouse Alexa633 (dilution 1:600), goat anti-rabbit Alexa488 (dilution 1:600) and goat anti-rabbit Alexa546 (dilution 1:600) (Invitrogen, USA). Secondary antibodies goat anti-Rat Cy3 and goat anti-Rat Cy5 were from Jackson Research Inc, USA.
Mycobacteria were used to infect RAW 267.4 cells or BMMs (MOI for BCG: 2.5 and for H37Rv: 1). After 2h of uptake, cells were washed 3 times with PBS and fresh medium plus gentamicin 10μg/mL (Sigma, Germany) was added. Cells were incubated at the indicated time points at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Subsequently, cells were lysed in sterile water and serially diluted in PBS- Tween-80 0.05%. Dilutions were plated in Middlebrook 7H10 complete agar medium (Difco Laboratories, Germany). Colonies were counted after 3 to 4 weeks to determine CFU.
Balb/C (WT) and Sort1−/− mice40 were bred and housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions at the Francis Crick Institute, Mill Hill Laboratory. All animals were bred and maintained for experiments in accordance with the United Kingdom Home Office regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the United Kingdom Home Office (project license 7008045). Groups of female 6–8 week old Sort1−/− and Balb/C wild-type control mice were infected by low-dose aerosol exposure with a growing (mid log phase) culture of H37Rv M. tuberculosis using a Glas-Col (Terre Haute, IN) aerosol generator calibrated to deliver approximately 100 bacteria into the lungs. Bacterial counts in the lungs and spleen (n=5) at each time point of the study were determined by plating serial dilutions of individual organ homogenates on duplicate plates of Middlebrook 7H10 agar containing OADC enrichment. CFU were counted after 3–4 weeks incubation at 37°C.
Separate whole lungs samples were fixed by inflating the tissues with formaldehyde. Formalin-fixed lungs were embedded, sectioned, and stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) at the Laboratory of Histology at the Francis Crick Institute. Slides were examined in an Olympus VS120 Slide reader microscope equipped with a colour digital camera. To determine the lung area covered by cellular infiltration, the ImageJ software program was used to calculate the area of immune infiltration. Percentage of the total lung area covered by cellular infiltration was calculated for each mouse by dividing the sum of granulomatous areas in these sections by the total area of the lung examined. 5 mice per condition were used and 3 lungs sections per mouse were analysed from 3 different experiments. For neutrophil staining, tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene (2×10min, 100%, 95% and 80% ethanol 2min each). Tissue sections were then placed into an antigen retrieval buffer (Access super antigen solution, Menarini diagnostics, UK) in a decloaking chamber (Biocare Medical, CA, USA); incubated at 110 degrees for 10min and allowed to cool for 60min. Sections were permeabilized in PBS-0.2% Triton X-100 and incubated in blocking buffer (1% BSA, 5% Fetal Calf Serum in PBS) overnight at room temperature. Polyclonal rabbit anti myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibody was from Dako (Dako, Denmark).
1×105 of transfected RAW 267.4 cells were seeded on 35mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek, USA). Cells were washed with PBS and replaced with imaging medium containing M. bovis BCG-DsRed at optical density (OD) 600nm=0.05 in full D-MEM medium without phenol Red, shortly before imaging with a Leica SP5 AOBS Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) equipped with an environment control chamber (EMBLEM, Germany). For live cell imaging the settings were scanning mode xyzt, pixel resolution of 1,024×1,024, scanner frequency of 200Hz, line averaging of 3, and zoom of 2. Frames were acquired every 20seconds during 17min. The time-lapse images were exported to uncompressed AVI-formatted movies as single channels with the LAS AF software (Leica microsystems). The RGB-color movies were loaded into Fiji (distribution of ImageJ available at http://fiji.sc., iterative versions of ImageJ used for this work are 1.41m through 1.46a) and transformed into 8-bit color movies. The 8-bit color movies were then ready for further quantification. To quantify the fluorescence of sortilin associated with the mycobacterial phagosome, the corresponding fluorescent-channel movies were loaded into Fiji. A region of interest (ROI), enclosing the bacteria in the red channel, was drawn by using the ‘polygon selections’ tool. In “Set Measurements” tool, only “Area” and “Integrated Density” were selected. Subsequently, the integrated intensity inside the ROI selected and redirected to the green channel (sortilin) was measured (“Analyze-Measure”). The position and the size of the ROI were adjusted manually with the movement of the bacteria in the different frames. Fluorescence intensity values were plotted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA).
Leica SP5 AOBS Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope was used (Leica Microsystems, Germany). During image acquisition for fixed samples, a single focal plane was monitored in time (xyt scanning mode) using a 63x/1.4 HCX-PLAPO oil objective, an Argon Laser (488nm) and DPSS Laser (561nm) when applicable, scanner frequency 200–400Hz; line averaging 6, using PMT and/or HyD detectors at a scanning resolution of 1024×1024 pixels. Zoom of 2.5. The same settings of the laser powers, gain and offset were maintained for the different experiments. The software of the microscope, LAS AF, allows saving the exact settings to acquire the images used in the experiments; therefore with every experiment the corresponding settings were loaded.
Analyses of all the images were performed using ImageJ (U.S. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) and Fiji. To measure intracellular bacterial intensity, Leica SP5 files (.lif) were opened using Fiji and split into their constitutive color channels. The corresponding channel was subjected to a pixel threshold (the same threshold was selected in all the cases). The bacteria per cell were selected using “wand-tracing tool”, and the “Integrated Density” measurement was taken (the sum of the values of the pixels in the selection that correspond with the number of intracellular bacteria). To measure the association of a marker (e.g., primary antibodies against ASMase or LAMP-2) with bacterial particles in the cell, the RGB image was split into individual channels, and the red channel (bacteria) was subjected to a pixel threshold. The “wand-tracing tool” was used to select all the bacteria per cell, and then the “Analyze-Measure” function of Fiji was used to measure the fluorescence intensity of the marker of interest (corresponding to the secondary antibody used to detect the primary antibody) associated to the bacterial phagosome by re-directing the measurements to the channel of interest in “Set Measurements” in Analyses function of Fiji. All the images were acquired with the same zoom and the different experiments were combined all together. Fluorescence intensity values were plotted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). The plots corresponding to “3D-colocalization” and “fluorescence intensity profile” of representative phagosomes showed in Fig. 1 were performed using ImageJ and Fiji.
Statistical calculations and normalizations were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 5.0a (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). Results are represented as the Mean±S.E.M from at least three independent experiments. P-values were calculated using Student’s two-tailed t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as indicated.
How to cite this article: Vázquez, C. L. et al. The proneurotrophin receptor sortilin is required for Mycobacterium tuberculosis control by macrophages. Sci. Rep. 6, 29332; doi: 10.1038/srep29332 (2016).
We are grateful to Tom Lerner and Laura Schnettger for critical reading of this manuscript, Dr. CM Petersen for providing the sortilin antibody, Radma Mahmood and Radhi Anand for excellent assistance with histology and Adebambo Adekoya and Kathleen Mathers for support with animal experiments. This work was supported by a Helmholtz Young Investigator Grant (Initiative and Networking funds of the Helmholtz Association) and the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding principally from Cancer Research UK, the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UP_1202/11 to MGG) and the Wellcome Trust.
Author Contributions C.L.V. and M.G.G. designed research. C.L.V., A.R., S.H., S.C., A.G., M.S.W. and M.G.G. performed experiments and analyzed the data. C.A.G., M.K. and A.N. contributed with critical reagents. M.G.G. wrote the manuscript and C.L.V. and M.G.G. prepared the figures. All authors reviewed and contributed with the final version of the manuscript.