PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 August 12.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4935663
NIHMSID: NIHMS795510

Knockdown expression of Syndecan in the fat body impacts nutrient metabolism and the organismal response to environmental stresses in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

The heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecans are transmembrane proteins involved in multiple physiological processes, including cell-matrix adhesion and inflammation. Recent evidence from model systems and humans suggest that syndecans have a role in energy balance and nutrient metabolism regulation. However, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms through which syndecans influence these phenotypes. Previously, we reported that D. melanogaster Syndecan (Sdc) mutants had reduced metabolic activity compared to controls. Here, we knocked down endogenous Sdc expression in the fat body (the functional equivalent of mammalian adipose tissue and liver) to investigate whether the effects on metabolism originate from this tissue. We found that knocking down Sdc in the fat body leads to flies with higher levels of glycogen and fat and that survive longer during starvation, likely due to their extra energy reserves and an increase in gluconeogenesis. However, compared to control flies, they are also more sensitive to environmental stresses (e.g. bacterial infection and cold) and have reduced metabolic activity under normal feeding conditions. Under the same conditions, fat-body Sdc reduction enhances expression of genes involved in glyceroneogenesis and gluconeogenesis and induces a drastic decrease in phosphorylation levels of AKT and extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2). Altogether, these findings strongly suggest that Drosophila fat body Sdc is involved in a mechanism that shifts resources to different physiological functions according to nutritional status.

Keywords: Fat body, syndecans, metabolism, survival, AKT, ERK1/2

Introduction

Excess body fat leads to obesity which has become a serious and increasingly costly worldwide public health problem due to its increased prevalence in adults, children, and adolescents [1]. The health consequences of excess fat are due to a strong correlation between adiposity and the metabolic syndrome, which is a cluster of cardio-metabolic alterations that increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and several cancers [2]. In recent years, D. melanogaster has emerged as a powerful model for studying human obesity and metabolic regulation [3]. To this end, earlier quantitative genetic studies performed in our laboratory pinpointed Sdc as a positional candidate gene affecting inter-individual differences in Drosophila fat storage [4]. Syndecans are type I transmembrane proteins that belong to the family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans and together with integrins are the major ECM adhesion receptors [5]. While the number of syndecan proteins varies across species (invertebrates have one, while humans have four encoded by four different genes, SDC1-4) their general structure appears to be conserved [5]. All syndecans are characterized by a core protein with extracellular attachment sites for glycosaminoglycan chains that mediate interactions with a wide array of ligands. Syndecans also contain a highly conserved transmembrane domain and a short cytoplasmic tail that binds to cytoskeleton proteins. This allows them to function independently and in synergy with integrin-mediated signaling to control cell adhesion, behavior, and fate [5, 6].

Our previous work showed that young flies homozygous for a hypomorphic Sdc mutation had lower levels of energy reserves, displayed lower metabolic activity, and reduced survival [4]. Human genetic studies performed in parallel also revealed that genetic polymorphisms in the SDC4 gene were associated with adiposity, fasting plasma glucose, and resting energy expenditure in American children [4]. Studies in mice have also reported a role for members of the syndecan family in adipocyte differentiation and energy balance [7, 8]. However, little is still known about the mechanisms through which syndecans regulate these metabolic phenotypes. Here, we used RNA interference (RNAi) through a UAS-driven transgene (UAS-IR) to down-regulate Sdc expression in the Drosophila fat body. The insect fat body plays a crucial role in nutrient metabolism [9]. Additionally, nutrient-sensing signaling pathways that have been associated with survival are highly active in this tissue [9]. We, therefore, reasoned that by reducing the expression of Sdc specifically in the fat body we could gain insightful information into its role in body composition and metabolism regulation.

Materials and methods

Fly stocks and husbandry

We used the GAL4/UAS approach [10] to knock-down (KD) the expression of Sdc in the fat body using a Larval serum protein 2 (Lsp2)-Gal4 driver [11, 12]. We chose this driver because the Lsp2 gene, although highly expressed in third instar larvae and only moderately in adult flies, is a specific marker of the fat body [11, 12]. The UAS-Sdc-IR (Stock ID: v13322) and w1118 (Stock ID: 5905) lines were obtained from the Vienna Stock Center and the Bloomington Stock Center, respectively. We crossed Lsp2-Gal4 male and UAS-Sdc-IR or w1118 female flies to generate the w1118; Lsp2-Gal4/+; UAS- Sdc-IR/+ (fat body Sdc KD, referred hereafter as lsp2>Sdc-IR) and w1118; Lsp2-Gal4/+; +/+ (control) genotypes. Four to six day old virgin flies of each genotype were assessed for the phenotypic assays described below. The w1118 genotype used in this study is the one in which the transgenic UAS-Sdc-IR stock was originally constructed (http://flystocks.bio.indiana.edu/Browse/VDRCtb.htm), thereby reducing differences in genetic background between lsp2>Sdc-IR and control flies that could affect the phenotypes. Virgin flies were used to minimize the influence of reproduction on energy metabolism. In our previous work we detected female-specific effects of the Sdc mutation on energy storage [4]; thus, only female flies were used in the present study. All flies were raised at 25°C on a standard cornmeal, molasses, and yeast medium.

Metabolic assays

TAG, glycogen, glucose, and protein levels were measured using protocols described in [13]. Free glucose concentration was subtracted from the total amount of glucose present in the sample after treatment with the enzyme amyloglucosidase in order to determine glycogen amounts. Trehalose was measured in hemolymph samples using the method described in [14].

Resting metabolic rate was measured as CO2 production using a flow-through respirometry system (Qubit System Research, Kingston, Ontario, Canada) and the method described in [13].

Feeding assay

Food intake was assessed using the Capillary Feeder (CAFÉ) assay described in [15] with slight modifications. Groups of five flies were housed in vials containing 1% agar medium and a microcapillary tube filled with liquid food media made up of 5% glucose and 5% autolyzed yeast. Flies were first allowed to acclimate to the capillary system overnight. Food consumption was then quantified for the 12 hour day and night cycles as the change in height of the liquid in the microcapillary tube. Control vials containing no flies were included to estimate the amount of water in the food that evaporated.

Locomotor activity

Locomotor activity was measured with the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (Trikinetics, Waltham, MA), which counts the number of times a given fly crosses an infrared beam during a specified time interval [4].

Starvation survival assay

Survival under starvation conditions was measured by placing 10 flies per genotype on 1.5% agarose medium and recording the number of flies alive at 8-h intervals until all were dead.

Immune response

Female flies were assayed for their ability to clear infection by Escherichia coli (HB101, a streptomycin resistant strain) using methods described in [16].

Chill-coma recovery

We used a chill-coma recovery assay to test cold tolerance. Groups of 25 females for each genotype were subjected to 0°C for 3 hours. Flies were then returned to room temperature and the time to restore locomotor function was measured.

Western Blot Analyses

Flies were dissected into phosphate-buffered saline and abdomens were homogenized in standard lysis buffer. Equal amounts of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA), blocked in 5% BSA, and incubated with 1:1000 rabbit β-Actin (Cell Signaling # 4967); 1:1000 rabbit anti-Phospho-Drosophila Akt (Ser505) (Cell Signaling #4054) and rabbit anti-Akt (Cell Signaling #9272); 1:1000 rabbit anti-Phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cell Signaling #9211) and rabbit anti-p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling #9212); 1:1000 rabbit anti-Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling #4377) and rabbit anti-p44/42 MAPK (Cell Signaling #4695); and 1:1000 rabbit anti-Phospho-SAPK/JNK(Thr183/Tyr185) (Cell Signaling #4668) and rabbit anti-JNK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. #sc-571). The primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibody was incubated with 1:5000 HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse for 1 hour at room temperature and the signal developed using an ECL detection kit (Merk Millipore).

Quantitative (q)PCR analysis

qPCRs were performed using the protocol described in [4]. Primers used in the study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Statistical analyses

Cox regression as implemented by SAS (V9.1.3) was used to compare survival of lsp2 > Sdc-IR and control flies under starvation conditions. One-way analysis of variance and analysis of covariance (with body weight used as covariate) were used to assess differences between experimental and control groups in locomotor activity and metabolic assays, respectively. Data from the other experimental assays were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test.

Results and Discussion

In the first series of experiments we verified that Sdc is localized to the plasma membrane of fat body cells in adult flies (Supplementary Fig. 1A). In contrast, no visible evidence of Sdc in the fat body of lsp2>Sdc-IR flies was observed by the immunohistochemical stain (Supplementary Fig. 1A). This result was corroborated by qPCR analysis, which showed a 60% reduction in Sdc expression in abdomens of lsp2>Sdc-IR flies compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Taken together, these results established that the RNAi approach produced the expected KD of Sdc in the adult fat body.

Next, we examined the effect of reducing Sdc in the fat body on energy stores. Contrary to observations in the Sdc mutant [4], fat-body specific KD of Sdc increased triacylglycerol (TAG) and glycogen contents by 27% and 37%, respectively (Fig. 1A). No difference in the levels of trehalose, the main circulating sugar, was observed (Fig. 1B). Because changes in energy balance can affect fat storage in flies [17], we then asked whether the increase in TAG content in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies might be due to an energy imbalance. There was no significant difference in locomotor activity between lsp2>Sdc-IR and control flies (Fig. 1C), but lsp2>Sdc-IR flies displayed a 16% reduction in metabolic rate (Fig. 1D), which could explain their higher TAG content. Interestingly, lsp2>Sdc-IR flies also ingested ~ 15% less food over a 24-hour window (Fig. 1E). To confirm these findings, we investigated two additional GAL4-driver lines - the Yolk-Gal4 and the drug (RU486) inducible S106-GS-Gal4 - that allow the expression of Gal4 specifically in adult fat body. In both cases, as seen in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies, KD of Sdc expression led to increased metabolite storage (Supplementary Fig. 2A and 2B) and decreased resting metabolic rate (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Similarly, KD of Sdc by S106-GS-Gal4 in the presence of RU486 significantly reduced 24-hour food consumption (Supplementary Fig. 2D). Flies carrying Yolk-Gal4 and UAS-Sdc-IR did not display any difference in the amount of food consumed compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 2D). However, given that Sdc is found in most tissues [18] and the Yolk-Gal4 line does not drive the expression of Gal4 exclusively in the fat body [14], it is possible that this latter finding could be a compensatory effect generated from another tissue.

Figure 1
Fat body-specific Sdc KD alters energy balance and nutrient stores in adult flies

Next, we sought to determine whether the changes in metabolism observed in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies would alter their ability to respond to stress challenges, such as nutrient starvation, bacterial infection, and cold exposure. We observed that starved lsp2>Sdc-IR flies lived longer than controls (Fig. 2A), but they had significantly reduced immune function, with 34% higher bacterial loads than controls 24 hours after infection (Fig. 2B). Additionally, it took lsp2>Sdc-IR flies longer (on average four minutes) to recover from cold-induced paralysis (Fig. 2C) than control flies.

Figure 2
Fat body-specific Sdc KD promotes resistance to starvation, but increases sensitivity to microbial infection and low temperature

To verify whether starvation resistance resulted from utilization of the higher energy reserves, we measured glycogen levels in flies fasted for 24 and 30 hours. To maintain glucose homeostasis during starvation, wild-type flies use their stored glycogen after a 24 hour fast [19]. Consistent with this previous work, glycogen levels dropped significantly in 24-hour fasted lsp2 > Sdc-IR and control flies (Fig. 2D). However, while glycogen levels of control flies were almost depleted after a 30-hour fast, those of lsp2>Sdc-IR flies were 58% higher in comparison with the 24 hour fast (Fig. 2D). This suggests that the reduction of Sdc in the fat body enhances the gluconeogenic fasting response and promotes glucose storage to glycogen. Concurrently, 30-hour fasted lsp2 >Sdc-IR flies had significantly increased (54%) glucose levels than controls (Fig. 2E). The rate of gluconeogenesis is controlled by the enzyme phosphoenol-pyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), which is transcriptionally regulated by a number of physiological signals and plays a key role also in the glyceroneogenesis pathway [20]. D. melanogaster contains two genes encoding PEPCK, CG10924 and Pepck [21], thus we evaluated the expression of these two genes after a 30 hour fast. We found that the expression of CG10924 and Pepck were significantly increased and decreased, respectively, in lsp2 > Sdc-IR flies compared to controls (Fig. 2F). Since Pepck has a more prominent role in Drosophila glycerol and triglyceride homeostasis than CG10924 [21], these results corroborate the idea that lsp2 >Sdc-IR flies display enhanced gluconeogenesis under fasting conditions. Additionally, they suggest that KD of Sdc in the fat body might cause an attenuation of glyceroneogenesis to limit free-fatty acids re-esterification, which is a highly ATP-consuming process [22].

To gain insight into how KD of Sdc in the fat body affects nutrient metabolism and the response to environmental stresses under fed conditions, we analyzed the transcriptome profile of abdomens (where the fat body is more conspicuous) of lsp2 > Sdc-IR and control flies by RNA-sequencing (Supplementary Table 2) (GEO accession number: GSE67001). We then selected 22 transcripts among those with fold changes greater than 1.3 between genotypes (at an uncorrected P-value of <0.05) for validation by qPCR using independent mRNA samples. We chose transcripts expressed in the fat body with known biological functions relevant to the traits affected by fat body-specific Sdc reduction. For 11 of the 22 genes, we confirmed significant differences in expression levels between lsp2>Sdc-IR and control flies (Fig. 3). Genes significantly up-regulated in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies include those involved in glycerol and fat metabolism (Pepck, Glycerol kinase-Gyk, Microsomal triacylglycerol transfer protein-Mtp, and Adipokinetic hormone receptor-AkhR), gluconeogenesis and glycogen metabolic process (CG10924 and Glycogen binding subunit 70E-Gbs-70E), response to oxidative stress (Ecdysone-induced protein 28/29kD-Eip71CD and Glutathione S transferase E1-GstE1), positive regulation of circadian sleep/wake and sleep (Angiotensin-converting enzyme related-Acer), and integrin-mediated cell adhesion (Tiggrin-Tig) [23]. qPCR analysis did not detect differential expression of NF-κB pathway controlled antimicrobial genes between lsp2 > Sdc-IR and control flies (Fig. 3). But, the expression of the gene Listericin, which encodes a protein that suppresses the growth of Gram-negative bacteria [24], was significantly reduced in lsp2 > Sdc-IR flies (Fig. 3) and so may contribute to the reduced bacterial clearance ability of these flies.

Figure 3
Fat body-specific Sdc KD induces changes in the expression of genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism under fed conditions

The transcriptional up-regulation of genes involved in gluconeogenesis under fed conditions raised the possibility that fat body-specific KD of Sdc might affect PI3K/AKT signaling. Thus, we assessed phosphorylation/activation of AKT (Ser505) in fly abdomens. As predicted, AKT phosphorylation levels were decreased by 43% in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies compared to control flies (Fig. 4). This finding echoes work in mammals showing that syndecan-4 activates the phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473 by regulating the assembly and plasma membrane recruitment of the mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 in endothelial cells [25].

Figure 4
Fat body-specific Sdc KD reduces phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2, and increases phosphorylation of JNK under fed conditions

The mammalian “stress regulated” mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, which are activated by a variety of environmental stresses, interact at different levels with the PI3K/AKT pathway to control cell survival and proliferation [26]. Thus, we further investigated whether the phosphorylation status of p42/p44 MAPK, p38 MAPK, and JNK was altered in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies compared to controls. Whereas no change in phospho-p38 MAPK levels were observed between genotypes (Fig. 4), we detected a significant increase (35%) in the phosphorylation of JNK (Fig. 4). Additionally, we found a dramatic decrease (75%) in the phosphorylation of p42/p44 MAPK (Fig. 4), which is consistent with the cross-inhibition between Ras-ERK and PI3-AKT pathways seen in mammals [27].

Altogether, our results indicate that reduced levels of Sdc in the fat body promotes an energy-saving mechanism for survival during periods of reduced food availability. We propose that this mechanism allows fat-body Sdc KD flies to allocate resources to storage and maintain circulating sugar (trehalose) homeostasis when food is available. This, in turn, triggers metabolic adaptations that lead to reduced metabolic activity, food intake, and ability to respond to other energy-demanding activities, such as immune function and cold tolerance. At the molecular level, this notion is supported by our finding of decreased phosphorylation of AKT and up-regulation of genes involved in glyceroneogenesis (Gyk and Pepck), gluconeogenesis (CG10924), and glycogen synthesis (Gbs-70E) in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies compared to controls under fed conditions. Of note, Gbs-70E encodes a protein similar to mammalian protein targeting to glycogen (PTG) whose overexpression in mouse liver has been recently reported to increase liver glycogen and reduce food intake [28]. Furthermore, we observed that fed lsp2>Sdc-IR flies had higher transcript levels of Eip71CD (encoding the Drosophila homolog of Methionine Sulfoxide Reductase A) than controls. Earlier work identified Eip71CD as a cold-responsive gene in two D. virilis groups [29], with expression levels of Eip71CD being consistently lower during acclimation to low temperature. Given that overexpression of Eip71CD also confers resistance to oxidative stress [30], it is possible that its higher expression levels in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies may be the result of an increase in oxidative stress in these flies. The trade-off, however, is an enhanced sensitivity to cold. The JNK signaling has been reported to trigger a stress-activated pathway that promotes Drosophila tolerance to oxidative stress and starvation [31]. Thus, the increase in JNK phosphorylation in lsp2>Sdc-IR flies further supports this view. These findings significantly increase our understanding of the role of syndecans in nutrient metabolism regulation.

Highlights

  • RNAi-mediated knockdown of Drosophila Syndecan in the fat body increases nutrient stores and reduces metabolic rate.
  • Flies with decreased Syndecan expression in the fat body are more resistant to nutrient deprivation but show more sensitivity to bacterial infection and cold.
  • Fat body specific-knockdown of Syndecan enhances the expression of genes related to glyceroneogenesis and glucose metabolism.
  • Fat body specific-knockdown of Syndecan reduces the phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2.

Supplementary Material

1

3

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Michael Crowley and David K. Crossman at the UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Sciences for performing RNA-sequencing analysis. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 DK084219) and UAB Diabetes Research Center Pilot & Feasibility Program (P30 DK079626) grants to MD.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Chan RS, Woo J. Prevention of overweight and obesity: how effective is the current public health approach. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2010;7:765–783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Kaur J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiology research and practice. 2014;2014:943162. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Owusu-Ansah E, Perrimon N. Modeling metabolic homeostasis and nutrient sensing in Drosophila: implications for aging and metabolic diseases. Disease models & mechanisms. 2014;7:343–350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. De Luca M, Klimentidis YC, Casazza K, Chambers MM, Cho R, Harbison ST, Jumbo-Lucioni P, Zhang S, Leips J, Fernandez JR. A conserved role for syndecan family members in the regulation of whole-body energy metabolism. PloS one. 2010;5:e11286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Morgan MR, Humphries MJ, Bass MD. Synergistic control of cell adhesion by integrins and syndecans. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2007;8:957–969. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Couchman JR, Gopal S, Lim HC, Norgaard S, Multhaupt HA. Syndecans: from peripheral coreceptors to mainstream regulators of cell behaviour. International journal of experimental pathology. 2015;96:1–10. [PubMed]
7. Kasza I, Suh Y, Wollny D, Clark RJ, Roopra A, Colman RJ, MacDougald OA, Shedd TA, Nelson DW, Yen MI, Yen CL, Alexander CM. Syndecan-1 is required to maintain intradermal fat and prevent cold stress. PLoS genetics. 2014;10:e1004514. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Reizes O, Benoit SC, Clegg DJ. The role of syndecans in the regulation of body weight and synaptic plasticity. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2008;40:28–45. [PubMed]
9. Arrese EL, Soulages JL. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:207–225. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993;118:401–415. [PubMed]
11. Lazareva AA, Roman G, Mattox W, Hardin PE, Dauwalder B. A role for the adult fat body in Drosophila male courtship behavior. PLoS genetics. 2007;3:e16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Armstrong AR, Laws KM, Drummond-Barbosa D. Adipocyte amino acid sensing controls adult germline stem cell number via the amino acid response pathway and independently of Target of Rapamycin signaling in Drosophila. Development. 2014;141:4479–4488. [PubMed]
13. Jumbo-Lucioni P, Ayroles JF, Chambers MM, Jordan KW, Leips J, Mackay TF, De Luca M. Systems genetics analysis of body weight and energy metabolism traits in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Park S, Alfa RW, Topper SM, Kim GE, Kockel L, Kim SK. A genetic strategy to measure circulating Drosophila insulin reveals genes regulating insulin production and secretion. PLoS genetics. 2014;10:e1004555. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Ja WW, Carvalho GB, Mak EM, de la Rosa NN, Fang AY, Liong JC, Brummel T, Benzer S. Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:8253–8256. [PubMed]
16. Lesser KJ, Paiusi IC, Leips J. Naturally occurring genetic variation in the age-specific immune response of Drosophila melanogaster. Aging cell. 2006;5:293–295. [PubMed]
17. Leopold P, Perrimon N. Drosophila and the genetics of the internal milieu. Nature. 2007;450:186–188. [PubMed]
18. Spring J, Paine-Saunders SE, Hynes RO, Bernfield M. Drosophila syndecan: conservation of a cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1994;91:3334–3338. [PubMed]
19. Wigglesworth VB. The utilization of reserve substances in Drosophila during flight. The Journal of experimental biology. 1949;26:150–163. illust. [PubMed]
20. Yang J, Kalhan SC, Hanson RW. What is the metabolic role of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase? The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284:27025–27029. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Bartok O, Teesalu M, Ashwall-Fluss R, Pandey V, Hanan M, Rovenko BM, Poukkula M, Havula E, Moussaieff A, Vodala S, Nahmias Y, Kadener S, Hietakangas V. The transcription factor Cabut coordinates energy metabolism and the circadian clock in response to sugar sensing. The EMBO journal. 2015;34:1538–1553. [PubMed]
22. Franckhauser S, Munoz S, Pujol A, Casellas A, Riu E, Otaegui P, Su B, Bosch F. Increased fatty acid re-esterification by PEPCK overexpression in adipose tissue leads to obesity without insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002;51:624–630. [PubMed]
23. Drysdale RA, Crosby MA, FlyBase C. FlyBase: genes and gene models. Nucleic acids research. 2005;33:D390–395. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Goto A, Yano T, Terashima J, Iwashita S, Oshima Y, Kurata S. Cooperative regulation of the induction of the novel antibacterial Listericin by peptidoglycan recognition protein LE and the JAK-STAT pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285:15731–15738. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Partovian C, Ju R, Zhuang ZW, Martin KA, Simons M. Syndecan-4 regulates subcellular localization of mTOR Complex2 and Akt activation in a PKCalpha-dependent manner in endothelial cells. Molecular cell. 2008;32:140–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Aksamitiene E, Kiyatkin A, Kholodenko BN. Cross-talk between mitogenic Ras/MAPK and survival PI3K/Akt pathways: a fine balance. Biochemical Society transactions. 2012;40:139–146. [PubMed]
27. Mendoza MC, Er EE, Blenis J. The Ras-ERK and PI3K-mTOR pathways: cross-talk and compensation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36:320–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Lopez-Soldado I, Zafra D, Duran J, Adrover A, Calbo J, Guinovart JJ. Liver glycogen reduces food intake and attenuates obesity in a high-fat diet-fed mouse model. Diabetes. 2015;64:796–807. [PubMed]
29. Vesala L, Salminen TS, Laiho A, Hoikkala A, Kankare M. Cold tolerance and cold-induced modulation of gene expression in two Drosophila virilis group species with different distributions. Insect molecular biology. 2012;21:107–118. [PubMed]
30. Chung H, Kim AK, Jung SA, Kim SW, Yu K, Lee JH. The Drosophila homolog of methionine sulfoxide reductase A extends lifespan and increases nuclear localization of FOXO. FEBS letters. 2010;584:3609–3614. [PubMed]
31. Wang MC, Bohmann D, Jasper H. JNK signaling confers tolerance to oxidative stress and extends lifespan in Drosophila. Developmental cell. 2003;5:811–816. [PubMed]