PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of acssdACS PublicationsThis JournalSearchSubmit a manuscript
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
 
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016 June 8; 8(22): 13902–13908.
Published online 2016 May 23. doi:  10.1021/acsami.6b02544
PMCID: PMC4928821

High Performance PbS Quantum Dot/Graphene Hybrid Solar Cell with Efficient Charge Extraction

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is am-2016-02544g_0007.jpg

Hybrid colloidal quantum dot (CQD) solar cells are fabricated from multilayer stacks of lead sulfide (PbS) CQD and single layer graphene (SG). The inclusion of graphene interlayers is shown to increase power conversion efficiency by 9.18%. It is shown that the inclusion of conductive graphene enhances charge extraction in devices. Photoluminescence shows that graphene quenches emission from the quantum dot suggesting spontaneous charge transfer to graphene. CQD photodetectors exhibit increased photoresponse and improved transport properties. We propose that the CQD/SG hybrid structure is a route to make CQD thin films with improved charge extraction, therefore resulting in improved solar cell efficiency.

Keywords: Hybrid solar cell, PbS quantum dot, Graphene, Exciton dissociation, Charge transfer

1. Introduction

Colloidal quantum dots (CQDs) are known to have outstanding optical and electrical properties, which has led to extensive studies of next generation optoelectronic devices such as light emitting diode, photodetectors, field effect transistors, and photovoltaics.17 In particular, the CQD’s tunable bandgap has the potential to cover the entire solar spectrum and harness photon energies more efficiently compared to conventional solar cell.810 To date, device efficiency improvements have been achieved by surface ligand engineering, substitution doping and/or multijunction device architectures.1115 To further improve the performance of CQD solar cells, the field has focused on the efficient extraction and transport of photogenerated charge carriers under incident light illumination through the fabrication of favorable energy band alignment of heterojunctions by surface functionalization1618 and/or the introduction of hybrid structures with CQD and nano carbon materials.1921 However, in spite of these rapid advances in device performance, the cell efficiency still lags behind other emerging solar cell technologies. Herein, we demonstrate a graphene/lead sulfide (PbS) CQD hybrid solar cell that shows enhanced photovoltaic performance dependent on the number of graphene injection layers. The hybrid solar cell is fabricated under ambient condition and graphene layers are inserted between CQD layers via a layer-by-layer deposition method. Furthermore, by employing various analytical techniques, graphene promoted exciton dissociation and improved charge transport in photoexcited PbS are hypothesized to be the origin of this efficiency enhancement.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Preparation of Colloidal Lead Sulfide Quantum Dots (PbS QDs)22,23

Lead precursor was formed by dissolving 2 mmol of lead oxide (PbO) into 6 mmol oleic acid (OA) and 12.7 mL 1-octadecene (ODE), the solution was kept at 100 °C under vacuum for 2 h. Under inert atmosphere, sulfur precursor (hexamethyldisilathiane in 6 mL of ODE) was hot-injected into the lead precursor. The system was subsequently allowed to cool down gradually to room temperature. The PbS QDs were purified several times by dissolving in hexane and precipitating with ethanol. Finally, the precipitation of PbS QDs was dispersed into toluene with a concentration of 50 mg/mL.

2.2. Preparation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and Single Layer Graphene (SG) Solutions.16

Zinc acetate dihydrate (0.9788 g) was dissolved in 42 mL of methanol and heated to 60 °C. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 0.469 g) was dissolved in 22 mL of methanol and dropped into the reaction flask over a period of 20 min. The solution was kept at 60 °C and the reaction solution turned into transparent pale. Subsequently, the flask was cooled to room temperature. The ZnO nanocrystals were purified and redispersed into methanol. After several purification steps, the ZnO NPs were dispersed into chloroform with a concentration of 50 mg/mL. SG solution was purchased from Graphene Supermarket and highly diluted with ethanol to 1 mg/mL. The average size of the single layered graphene (SG) flake is about 500 nm.

2.3. Characterization of Semiconductor Quantum Dots and Graphene

The crystal structure of PbS nanocrystal was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD. Bruker D5000) in a two theta range of 10–90°. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurement was carried out on a JEOL JEM-2200MCO FEGTEM. TEM sample was prepared by dropping diluted PbS solution on nickel grid with carbon supporting film. Morphology investigations of PbS and PbS/SG film were measured by scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Quanta 600 FEG) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, Veeco Dimension 3100). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Varian Excalibur FTS 3500) measurement was performed to confirm the TBAI-ligand exchanged PbS and PbS/SG film on glass substrates. Structural study of single layer graphene was carried out using Raman spectrometer (Horiba Scientific Lab RAM ARAMIS) with 532 nm line for excitation source and UV–visible spectrometer (Varian Cary 5000) with diluted PbS solution in a quartz cuvette. Photoluminescence (PL) quenching behavior was observed using a stationary microphotoluminescence (PL, Horiba LabRam80) spectrum with a 325 nm He–Cd laser (30 mW) as an excitation source at room temperature.

2.4. Device Fabrication and Measurement (CQD Solar Cell)

The ZnO layer serving as electron-transporting/hole blocking layer was fabricated by spin-coating a solution of ZnO nanoparticles onto patterned ITO/glass substrates. Subsequently, PbS CQD and SG flake layers were prepared by layer-by-layer spin coating at 2000 rpm for 30 s. For the solid-state ligand exchange of PbS layer, tetrabutylammonium iodide solution with concentration of 10 mg/mL was then applied for 30 s when PbS film was held stationary, followed by a two-cycle washing process with methanol. One to two drops of SG solution was deposited onto the PbS surface and the substrate was subsequently washed with methanol and ethanol. 1,2-Ethanedithiol (EDT) solution (0.02 vol% in acetonitrile) was used for electron blocking/hole transport layer in a junction solar cell. All processes were repeated until the desired film thickness had been achieved under ambient condition. Gold (Au) film with 100 nm thickness was deposited by thermal evaporation in high vacuum. A shadow mask was used to define three separated areas of 0.0128 cm2. Solar cell measurements were performed using a source meter (Keithley 4200-SCS) and a solar simulator (LOT-Quantum Design) with an AM 1.5 G filter (100 mW/cm2). The measurement was performed in ambient air at room temperature and confirmed with a certified monocrystalline silicon reference cell (Rera system).

2.5. Device Fabrication and Measurement (CQD Photodetector)

CQD photodetectors were fabricated using PbS and SG solutions by standard photo lithography process. Photoresist (MICROPOSIT S1813) was spin coated on a heavily doped p++2 silicon (100) wafer with a thermally grown 300 nm SiO2 layer and baked at 115 °C for 60 s. The substrate was exposed through a complementary photomask of the electrode pattern and then developed in MICROPOSIT MF-319 developer for 30 s, rinsed in water for 2 min. A metal electrode of 100 nm Au was deposited by thermal evaporation in high vacuum. After lift-off process, PbS and SG solutions are dispersed onto the devices by a layer-by-layer spin coating method. This was repeated for three cycles until the desired shell thickness of approximately 90 nm was reached. Photoresponse measurement was performed in ambient air using a probe station (Cascade Microtech) and Keithley 4200-SCS system.

3. Results and Discussion

Considering the relatively low conductivity of CQDs,2426 an intermediate pathway to quickly extract and transfer the photogenerated charge carriers is highly desirable to suppress exciton radiative recombination in the light-absorbing CQD layer. A number of conductive and semiconductive carbon-based materials such as fullerenes and carbon nanotubes have been demonstrated as efficient charge acceptor and/or transport layer in various optoelectronic semiconductor devices.2731 Among these functional nano carbon structures for efficient charge dissociation, graphene is one of the most promising candidates because of the lower energy level of graphene to the LUMO of PbS, extremely high electronic mobility (104 cm2/V·s at room temperature) as well as high transparency due to its atomic thickness (optical absorption of 2.3% per layer) minimizing interruption of the incident light absorption by the QDs.32,33 Here we use SG flakes as an interlayer as illustrated in Figure Figure11a. The graphene layer inserted between CQD layers enables efficient extraction and transfer of photoinduced electron from QD to the adjacent graphene due to its high carrier mobility and lower energy level to the LUMO of PbS (Figure Figure11b).

Figure 1

Schematic of (a) hybrid solar cell of graphene and semiconductor nanocrystals and (b) electron-transfer interaction. Brown dotted and blue solid arrows indicate recombination in QD and charge transfer from QD to graphene under light illumination, respectively. ...

Generally, as-grown CQDs are passivated by long chain ligands such as oleic acid to prevent the oxidation and the aggregation of the nanocrystals. The ligand exchange from the long chain ligands to shorter chain is an essential processes for CQD-based electronic and optoelectronic devices to increase charge carrier mobility. Layer-by-layer spin coating process (Figure Figure22a) facilitates the effective ligand exchange of PbS CQD surface compared to the deposition method of CQD/carbon mixed material,3436 in which effective ligand exchange of CQDs can be hindered by the carbon materials covering the CQDs but also enables the deposition of SG flake layers with a uniform distribution (Supporting Information Figure S1). Moreover, it can provide a better way to control the number and position of the SG flake layers, resulting in exciton dissociation and charge transport enhancement in the PbS CQD absorption layer. Recently, tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI) has been used as an air stable exchange ligand to produce high efficiency photovoltaic devices.14,37,38 To determine successful ligand exchange in hybrid structure, FTIR spectroscopy was used. Significant reduction of OA related vibrations at 2920 cm–1 (asymmetric C–H), 2850 cm–1 (symmetric C–H), 1545 cm–1 (asymmetric COO−), and 1403 cm–1 (symmetric COO−) is observed in the FTIR spectrum of Figure Figure22b after the ligand exchange process from OA to TBAI. These reduced vibration intensities indicate the removal of OA after iodide passivation and successful ligand exchange through the layer-by-layer deposition for PbS/SG hybrid structure. Both the absorption spectra of 1.3 eV PbS and PbS/SG film structures passivated with the iodide ligand in Figure Figure22c show a red-shift in absorption (approximately 1020 nm) compared to that of as-grown PbS CQD which is observed in a number of previous reports (Supporting Information Figure S2 and S3)3943

Figure 2

(a) Schematic illustrating the fabrication of a layered hybrid structure by using layer-by-layer deposition process. (b) FTIR spectrum of oleic acid-capped (gray solid line), iodide-passivated PbS (black solid line), and iodide-passivated PbS/SG structure ...

It is known that graphene has outstanding electrical properties, but each layer absorbs a rather large 2.3% of incident light over the visible spectrum. Therefore, use of a diluted SG solution could minimize light absorption while providing considerable electrical pathways even in thick CQD structure. The transmittance of the graphene flake (shown in Figure Figure33a) is only slightly higher than continuously grown single-layer graphene which means that the light absorption properties of PbS CQD is rarely affected by inserted SG layers. Figure Figure33b exhibits Raman spectra obtained from the SG flake on SiO2/Si wafer. Three intensive features associated with sp2-bonded graphene were observed at 1341, 1574, and 2677 cm–1, corresponding to D band, G band, and 2D band, respectively.44 The relatively large D peak may be mainly due to the smaller size of SG flakes than the laser spot size of Raman equipment. (inset of Figure Figure33b).45,46

Figure 3

(a) Transmittance spectrum and (b) Raman spectrum of the SG flake layer. Inset is a FESEM image of SG flake on PbS QD film surface.

Enhanced performance of the hybrid solar cell through controlled insertion of conductive graphene between TBAI-passivated PbS CQD layers are shown in Figure Figure44. The devices were prepared by 12 cycle spin coating of PbS on ZnO/ITO substrates with 0, 5, and 9 layers of SG flake (Figure Figure44a and Supporting Information Figure S4).19 Similar values of the open circuit voltage (Voc) were obtained from CQD solar cell with and without graphene interlayers (Table 1). This implies the controlled insertion of SG flakes has no significant influence on the band alignment and interface properties of the solar cell components. However, it is notable that the graphene injection into CQD layers led to a substantial increase of the short-circuit current density (Jsc) which in turn resulted in high solar efficiency up to 6.99% (Figure Figure44b and and4c).4c). The performance also depends on the number of the graphene injection layers in the hybrid solar cells. Photogenerated electrons are transferred to the neighboring graphene resulting in a suppression of exciton recombination in the QD, allowing for more efficient collection to the electrodes. The fast charge transport significantly promotes the flow of charge carriers along the absorption layer. This is also supported by the decrease in internal series resistance (Rs) as increase of SG layers (Figure Figure44d). Consistent with Jsc and PCE, the Rs values are decreased with graphene injection which enables to provide considerable number of the pathways to overcome the relatively low conductivity of CQD film. The method is now optimized to produce high-efficiency devices. Graphene incorporation in conventional TBAI-PbS/EDT-PbS junction structure results the significantly enhanced photovoltaic performance of 8.82 ± 0.55% with a 9.18% lab champion device. (Figure Figure44e and Table S1) The devices consisted of 10 layers of TBAI-PbS and 2 layers of EDT-PbS deposited on ZnO/ITO/glass substrates. In the device, 9 layers of SG flake were incorporated in the TBAI-PbS CQD absorber layers. (Supporting Information Figure S5)

Figure 4

(a) Energy level diagram of layered hybrid QD solar cell with graphene. (b) Representative JV characteristics of the devices under AM 1.5G irradiation at an incident intensity of 100 mW/cm2. Black, blue, and red dotted lines indicate TBAI-PbS, ...

Table 1

Photovoltaic Characteristics of PbS, PbS/SG (5L), and PbS/SG (9L) Solar Cellsa

The enhanced performance of the PbS/SG hybrid structure due to the fast charge extraction phenomenon is also supported by photoluminescence (PL) quenching behavior under excitation at 325 nm. PL measurement was performed by spin coating 1.37 eV PbS QDs solution onto the glass substrate. The PL spectra both of the PbS and PbS/SG hybrid structures are shown in Figure Figure55a. All spectra present a dominant broad emission at around 900 nm, which is attributed to the 1.37 eV PbS QDs. However, we noted that the emission intensity of the hybrid structure was dramatically quenched compared to that of PbS one. Taking account of the lower energy level, electron transfer from photoexcited PbS to graphene is energetically favorable. Therefore, the emission quenching in the hybrid structure can be inferred by the enhanced transfer of excited state electron from LUMO of PbS to graphene, while it minimizes charge recombination rate.4749

Figure 5

(a) Room-temperature PL spectra collected from the 1.37 eV PbS (black solid line) and hybrid PbS/SG structures (red solid line). (b) Optical image of a photodetector device and (c) transient photocurrent characteristics obtained from the 1.3 eV PbS (black ...

The fast charge transfer caused by the SG flake in PbS also improves CQD photodetector devices. Figure Figure55b and and5c5c show the time-resolved photoresponse of the PbS and hybrid PbS/SG structures upon light illumination. At a fixed bias of 10 V, reproducible photocurrent was obtained by switching repeated on–off cycles of the light irradiation.50 The photocurrent of the hybrid structure dramatically increases from 272 pA (off state) to 10.6 nA (on state) and the on–off ratio is approximately 1.4 times higher than the PbS device. (Supporting Information Table S2) Moreover, the rise time (τ) of the photoresponse obtained from the PbS/SG device was approximately 2.1 ms, which is faster than the rise time of 3.1 ms in the case of PbS only (Figure Figure55d). This is attributed to a strong photoexcited state interaction between PbS and the SG flake which leads to the rapidly increasing the flow of charge carriers in the hybrid structure.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have fabricated and evaluated hybrid CQD solar cells stacked with graphene layers for efficient charge carrier transfer based on a cost-effective and reliable layer-by-layer deposition process. The photovoltaic performance of the layer-by-layer architecture has shown the enhanced current density from approximately 19.58 ± 0.40 mA/cm2 to 24.09 ± 0.46 mA/cm2 due to the efficient extraction and transportation of photogenerated charges. These phenomena have been examined and supported by the quenching of PL intensity and enhanced photoresponse characteristics leading a high performance of CQD photovoltaic device.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under ERC Grant Agreement n. 340538. The authors would like to thank the financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (2015M2A2A6A02045252).

Supporting Information Available

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b02544.

  • Structural and morphological analysis of PbS QD and SG, photovoltaic performance of TBAI-PbS/EDT-PbS and TBAI-PbS/SG/EDT-PbS junction solar cells. Photoresponse characteristics of PbS and PbS/SG devices (PDF)

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

References

  • Caruge J. M.; Halpert J. E.; Wood V.; Bulovic V.; Bawendi M. G. Colloidal Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting Diodes with Metal-Oxide Charge Transport Layers. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 247–250.10.1038/nphoton.2008.34 [Cross Ref]
  • Zhao J.; Bardecker J. A.; Munro A. M.; Liu M. S.; Niu Y.; Ding I. K.; Luo J.; Chen B.; Jen A. K. Y.; Ginger D. S. Efficient CdSe/CdS Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes using a Thermally Polymerized Hole Transport Layer. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 463–467.10.1021/nl052417e [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dai X.; Zhang Z.; Jin Y.; Niu Y.; Cao H.; Liang X.; Chen L.; Wang J.; Peng X. Solution-Processed, High-Performance Light-Emitting Diodes based on Quantum Dots. Nature 2014, 515, 96–99.10.1038/nature13829 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Konstantatos G.; Howard I.; Fischer A.; Hoogland S.; Clifford J.; Klem E.; Levina L.; Sargent E. H. Ultrasensitive Solution-Cast Quantum Dot Photodetectors. Nature 2006, 442, 180–183.10.1038/nature04855 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Prins F.; Buscema M.; Seldenthuis J. S.; Etaki S.; Buchs G.; Barkelid M.; Zwiller V.; Gao Y.; Houtepen A. J.; Siebbeles L. D. A.; Van Der Zant H. S. J. Fast and Efficient Photodetection in Nanoscale Quantum-Dot Junctions. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5740–5743.10.1021/nl303008y [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu Y.; Tolentino J.; Gibbs M.; Ihly R.; Perkins C. L.; Liu Y.; Crawford N.; Hemminger J. C.; Law M. PbSe Quantum Dot Field-Effect Transistors with Air-Stable Electron Mobilities above 7 cm2 V–1 s–1. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1578–1587.10.1021/nl304753n [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ghosh S.; Hoogland S.; Sukhovatkin V.; Levina L.; Sargent E. H. A Tunable Colloidal Quantum Dot Photo Field-Effect Transistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 101102..10.1063/1.3636438 [Cross Ref]
  • Alivisatos A. P. Semiconductor Clusters, Nanocrystals, and Quantum Dots. Science 1996, 271, 933–937.10.1126/science.271.5251.933 [Cross Ref]
  • Kang Z.; Liu Y.; Tsang C. H. A.; Ma D. D. D.; Fan X.; Wong N. B.; Lee S. T. Water-Soluble Silicon Quantum Dots with Wavelength-Tunable Photoluminescence. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 661–664.10.1002/adma.200801642 [Cross Ref]
  • Ruddy D. A.; Johnson J. C.; Smith E. R.; Neale N. R. Size and Bandgap Control in the Solution-Phase Synthesis of Near-Infrared-Emitting Germanium Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7459–7466.10.1021/nn102728u [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dubois F.; Mahler B.; Dubertret B.; Doris E.; Mioskowski C. A Versatile Strategy for Quantum Dot Ligand Exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 482–483.10.1021/ja067742y [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zillner E.; Fengler S.; Niyamakom P.; Rauscher F.; Köhler K.; Dittrich T. Role of Ligand Exchange at CdSe Quantum Dot Layers for Charge Separation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16747–16754.10.1021/jp303766d [Cross Ref]
  • Brown P. R.; Kim D.; Lunt R. R.; Zhao N.; Bawendi M. G.; Grossman J. C.; Bulović V. Energy Level Modification in Lead Sulfide Quantum Dot Thin Films through Ligand Exchange. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5863–5872.10.1021/nn500897c [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tang J.; Kemp K. W.; Hoogland S.; Jeong K. S.; Liu H.; Levina L.; Furukawa M.; Wang X.; Debnath R.; Cha D.; Chou K. W.; Fischer A.; Amassian A.; Asbury J. B.; Sargent E. H. Colloidal-Quantum-Dot Photovoltaics using Atomic-Ligand Passivation. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 765–771.10.1038/nmat3118 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Stavrinadis A.; Rath A. K.; de Arquer F. P. G.; Diedenhofen S. L.; Magén C.; Martinez L.; So D.; Konstantatos G. Heterovalent Cation Substitutional Doping for Quantum Dot Homojunction Solar Cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2981..10.1038/ncomms3981 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chuang C. H. M.; Brown P. R.; Bulović V.; Bawendi M. G. Improved Performance and Stability in Quantum Dot Solar Cells through Band Alignment Engineering. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 796–801.10.1038/nmat3984 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lan X.; Masala S.; Sargent E. H. Charge-Extraction Strategies for Colloidal Quantum Dot Photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 233–240.10.1038/nmat3816 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ko D. K.; Brown P. R.; Bawendi M. G.; Bulovic V. P-I-N Heterojunction Solar Cells with a Colloidal Quantum-dot Absorber Layer. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4845–4850.10.1002/adma.201401250 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hu L.; Li D. B.; Gao L.; Tan H.; Chen C.; Li K.; Li M.; Han J. B.; Song H.; Liu H.; Tang J. Graphene Doping Improved Device Performance of ZnMgO/PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Photovoltaics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1899–1907.10.1002/adfm.201505043 [Cross Ref]
  • Guo C. X.; Yang H. B.; Sheng Z. M.; Lu Z. S.; Song Q. L.; Li C. M. Layered Graphene/Quantum dots for Photovoltaic Devices. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3014–3017.10.1002/anie.200906291 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Meng W.; Zhou X.; Qiu Z.; Liu C.; Chen J.; Yue W.; Wang M.; Bi H. Reduced Graphene Oxide-Supported Aggregates of CuInS2 Quantum Dots as an Effective Hybrid Electron Acceptor for Polymer-based Solar cells. Carbon 2016, 96, 532–540.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.068 [Cross Ref]
  • Hines M. A.; Scholes G. D. Colloidal PbS Nanocrystals with Size-Tunable Near-Infrared Emission: Observation of Post-Synthesis Self-Narrowing of the Particle Size Distribution. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1844–1849.10.1002/adma.200305395 [Cross Ref]
  • Barkhouse D. A. R.; Debnath R.; Kramer I. J.; Zhitomirsky D.; Pattantyus-Abraham A. G.; Levina L.; Etgar L.; Grätzel M.; Sargent E. H. Depleted Bulk Heterojunction Colloidal Quantum Dot Photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3134–3138.10.1002/adma.201101065 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Meir Y.; Wingreen N. S.; Lee P. A. Low-Temperature Transport through a Quantum Dot: The Anderson Model out of Equilibrium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 2601–2604.10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2601 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kunets V. P.; Dias M. R. S.; Rembert T.; Ware M. E.; Mazur Y. I.; Lopez-Richard V.; Mantooth H. A.; Marques G. E.; Salamo G. J. Electron Transport in Quantum Dot Chains: Dimensionality Effects and Hopping Conductance. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 183709..10.1063/1.4804324 [Cross Ref]
  • Wingreen N. S.; Meir Y. Anderson Model out of Equilibrium: Noncrossing-Approximation Approach to Transport through a Quantum Dot. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1994, 49, 11040–11052.10.1103/PhysRevB.49.11040 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Thompson B. C.; Fréchet J. M. J. Polymer-Fullerene Composite Solar Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 58–77.10.1002/anie.200702506 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lee J. M.; Kwon B. H.; Park H. I.; Kim H.; Kim M. G.; Park J. S.; Kim E. S.; Yoo S.; Jeon D. Y.; Kim S. O. Exciton Dissociation and Charge-Transport Enhancement in Organic Solar Cells with Quantum-Dot/N-doped CNT Hybrid Nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2011–2017.10.1002/adma.201204454 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kymakis E.; Alexandrou I.; Amaratunga G. A. J. High Open-Circuit Voltage Photovoltaic Devices from Carbon-Nanotube-Polymer Composites. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 1764–1768.10.1063/1.1535231 [Cross Ref]
  • Guldi D. M.; Rahman G. M. A.; Zerbetto F.; Prato M. Carbon Nanotubes in Electron Donor - Acceptor Nanocomposites. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 871–878.10.1021/ar040238i [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jun G. H.; Jin S. H.; Lee B.; Kim B. H.; Chae W. S.; Hong S. H.; Jeon S. Enhanced Conduction and Charge-Selectivity by N-doped Graphene Flakes in the Active Layer of Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 3000–3006.10.1039/c3ee40963e [Cross Ref]
  • Nair R. R.; Blake P.; Grigorenko A. N.; Novoselov K. S.; Booth T. J.; Stauber T.; Peres N. M. R.; Geim A. K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. Science 2008, 320, 1308..10.1126/science.1156965 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bolotin K. I.; Sikes K. J.; Jiang Z.; Klima M.; Fudenberg G.; Hone J.; Kim P.; Stormer H. L. Ultrahigh Electron Mobility in Suspended Graphene. Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351–355.10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 [Cross Ref]
  • Yuan L.; Jiang L.; Liu J.; Xia Z.; Wang S.; Sun G. Facile Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Three Dimensional Graphene Oxide/Carbon Black Composite and Its Application for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 135, 168–174.10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.137 [Cross Ref]
  • Markad G. B.; Battu S.; Kapoor S.; Haram S. K. Interaction Between Quantum Dots of CdTe and Reduced Graphene Oxide: Investigation through Cyclic Voltammetry and Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 20944–20950.10.1021/jp406679s [Cross Ref]
  • Banerjee S.; Wong S. S. In situ Quantum Dot Growth on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10342–10350.10.1021/ja035980c [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ning Z.; Voznyy O.; Pan J.; Hoogland S.; Adinolfi V.; Xu J.; Li M.; Kirmani A. R.; Sun J. P.; Minor J.; Kemp K. W.; Dong H.; Rollny L.; Labelle A.; Carey G.; Sutherland B.; Hill I.; Amassian A.; Liu H.; Tang J.; Bakr O. M.; Sargent E. H. Air-Stable N-Type Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 822–828.10.1038/nmat4007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Milliron D. J. Quantum Dot Solar Cells: The Surface Plays a Core Role. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 772–773.10.1038/nmat4032 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ma W.; Luther J. M.; Zheng H.; Wu Y.; Alivisatos A. P. Photovoltaic Devices Employing Ternary PbS xSe1-x Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1699–1703.10.1021/nl900388a [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Williams K. J.; Tisdale W. A.; Leschkies K. S.; Haugstad G.; Norris D. J.; Aydil E. S.; Zhu X. Y. Strong Electronic Coupling in Two-Dimensional Assemblies of Colloidal PbSe Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1532–1538.10.1021/nn9001819 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Koole R.; Liljeroth P.; De Mello Donegá C.; Vanmaekelbergh D.; Meijerink A. Electronic Coupling and Exciton Energy Transfer in CdTe Quantum-Dot Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10436–10441.10.1021/ja061608w [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fafarman A. T.; Koh W. K.; Diroll B. T.; Kim D. K.; Ko D. K.; Oh S. J.; Ye X.; Doan-Nguyen V.; Crump M. R.; Reifsnyder D. C.; Murray C. B.; Kagan C. R. Thiocyanate-Capped Nanocrystal Colloids: Vibrational Reporter of Surface Chemistry and Solution-based Route to Enhanced Coupling in Nanocrystal Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15753–15761.10.1021/ja206303g [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zillner E.; Fengler S.; Niyamakom P.; Rauscher F.; Köhler K.; Dittrich T. Role of Ligand Exchange at CdSe Quantum Dot Layers for Charge Separation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16747–16754.10.1021/jp303766d [Cross Ref]
  • Ferrari A. C.; Meyer J. C.; Scardaci V.; Casiraghi C.; Lazzeri M.; Mauri F.; Piscanec S.; Jiang D.; Novoselov K. S.; Roth S.; Geim A. K. Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401..10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ferrari A. C. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and Graphite: Disorder, Electron-Phonon Coupling, Doping and Nonadiabatic Effects. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47–57.10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 [Cross Ref]
  • Katagiri G.; Ishida H.; Ishitani A. Raman Spectra of Graphite Edge Planes. Carbon 1988, 26, 565–571.10.1016/0008-6223(88)90157-1 [Cross Ref]
  • Robel I.; Bunker B. A.; Kamat P. V. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-CdS Nanocomposites as Light-Harvesting Assemblies: Photoinduced Charge-Transfer Interactions. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2458–2463.10.1002/adma.200500418 [Cross Ref]
  • Biju V.; Itoh T.; Baba Y.; Ishikawa M. Quenching of Photoluminescence in Conjugates of Quantum Dots and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 26068–26074.10.1021/jp0657890 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Martín-García B.; Polovitsyn A.; Prato M.; Moreels I. Efficient Charge Transfer in Solution-processed PbS Quantum Dot-Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid Materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 7088–7095.10.1039/C5TC01137J [Cross Ref]
  • Saran R.; Curry R. J. Lead Sulphide Nanocrystal Photodetector Technologies. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 81–92.10.1038/nphoton.2015.280 [Cross Ref]

Articles from ACS AuthorChoice are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society