|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Osteosarcoma is a rare disease diagnosed as malignant bone tumor. It is generally refractory to chemotherapy, which contributes to its poor prognosis. The reversal of chemoresistance is a major clinical challenge to improve the prognostic outcome of osteosarcoma patients. We developed a tumor-specific replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus, OBP-301 (telomelysin) and assessed its synergistic effects with chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin and doxorubicin) using human osteosarcoma cell lines and a xenograft tumor model. The molecular mechanism underlying the chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301 was evaluated in aspects of apoptosis induction. OBP-301 inhibits anti-apoptotic myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) expression, which in turn leads to chemosensitization in human osteosarcoma cells. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of MCL1 expression sensitized human osteosarcoma cells to common chemotherapeutic agents. We also found that upregulation of microRNA-29 targeting MCL1 via virally induced transcriptional factor E2F-1 activation was critical for the enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus synergistically suppressed the viability of human osteosarcoma cells in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. The combination treatment also significantly inhibited tumor growth, as compared to monotherapy, in an osteosarcoma xenograft tumor model. Our data suggest that replicative virus-mediated tumor-specific MCL1 ablation may be a promising strategy to attenuate chemoresistance in osteosarcoma patients.
Osteosarcoma is a rare disease with less than 1,000 new cases every year diagnosed as malignant primary bone tumors in children and adolescents in the United States1. Despite recent advances in multi-agent chemotherapy and aggressive surgical resection, the poor response to chemotherapy is a major critical prognostic factor in osteosarcoma patients2,3. Chemotherapy-refractory osteosarcoma patients frequently show tumor recurrence, distant metastasis and poor prognosis. Increasing the chemotherapy dose induced short-lasting remission, but did not increase survival. The survival rate has remained unchanged over the past 30 years2. Therefore, the enhancement of chemosensitivity is a potential approach to improve the clinical outcome of osteosarcoma patients.
The molecular mechanism underlying the resistance to chemotherapy in osteosarcoma patients is poorly understood. One possible mechanism is the resistance to apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents4,5. The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) family proteins are suspected to regulate apoptotic cell death caused by chemotherapeutic agents in human osteosarcoma cells2. The anti-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins, including BCL26, myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1)7, and B-cell lymphoma-X large (BCL-XL)8, are frequently overexpressed in human sarcoma cells. Indeed, the suppression of BCL29, MCL17, and BCL-XL8 can enhance the chemosensitivity of human sarcoma cells. These findings suggest that anti-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins are potential therapeutic targets to improve the chemoresistance in osteosarcoma patients. Hence, the development of a novel therapy that efficiently suppresses the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins is needed.
Virus infection and replication produce exogenous viral proteins, many of which manipulate the host cellular machinery to allow viral persistence in the life-cycle. Indeed, adenoviral E1A, a gene product in the adenoviral early region, exerts tumor suppressive functions, including enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis via stabilization of tumor suppressors such as p53 and p2110 and inhibition of cell proliferation via suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)11 and HER212. Adenoviral E1B55kDa protein also induces the proteolytic degradation of the Mre11-Rad50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, leading to the profound radiosensitization of human cancer cells13,14. Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising antitumor strategy to induce tumor-specific cell death15. These findings suggest that oncolytic viruses may influence the sensitivity of human osteosarcoma cells to chemotherapeutic agents.
In the present study, we show that genetically engineered telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus OBP-301 (telomelysin) efficiently kills human osteosarcoma cells and markedly sensitizes them to common chemotherapeutic agents. Notably, targeting the anti-apoptotic BCL2 family protein MCL1 via OBP-301-induced microRNA-29 activation is critical as the underlying mechanism of the OBP-301-mediated chemosensitizing effect.
We have developed a telomerase-specific replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus, OBP-301 (telomelysin), which induces tumor-specific cell death in a variety of human cancer cells16,17. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of chemotherapeutic agents and OBP-301 in human osteosarcoma cells, we first analyzed the in vitro cytotoxic effect of two chemotherapeutic agents, cisplatin (CDDP) and doxorubicin (DOX), which are frequently used for the treatment of osteosarcoma, and OBP-301 in 4 human osteosarcoma cell lines (MNNG/HOS, SaOS-2, HOS, and 143B). MNNG/HOS and SaOS-2 cells were relatively less sensitive to CDDP or DOX as compared to HOS and 143B cells (Fig. 1a). In combination with chemotherapeutic agents at the clinically used ratio (CDDP:DOX=4:1), SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells were also less sensitive to combination chemotherapy than HOS and 143B cells. In contrast, OBP-301 suppressed the viability of SaOS-2 and HOS cells more efficiently as compared to MNNG/HOS and 143B cells. These results indicate that SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells are relatively resistant to chemotherapeutic agents in human osteosarcoma cells.
We have recently shown the synergistic chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301 in human epithelial malignant tumor cells18. To investigate the chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301 in human osteosarcoma cells, we treated human osteosarcoma cells with chemotherapeutic agents and OBP-301 in combination therapy to achieve a synergistic effect. The most suitable condition for combination therapy was treatment with the chemotherapeutic agents for 24hours following OBP-301 infection for 48hours (Suppl. Fig. 1). When cells were treated with OBP-301 and chemotherapeutic agents (CDDP:DOX=4:1) by the most suitable combination protocol, cell viability was decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1b). The calculation of the combination index demonstrated the synergistic antitumor effect of combination therapy in all 4 human osteosarcoma cell lines (Fig. 1c). In contrast, administration of chemotherapeutic agents did not affect the replication efficacy of OBP-301 in SAOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Suppl. Fig. 2). These results suggest that OBP-301 is a potent chemosensitizer in human osteosarcoma cells.
To evaluate the underlying mechanism in the OBP-301-mediated enhancement of chemosensitivity, we assessed whether OBP-301 enhances chemotherapy-mediated apoptosis induction and DNA damage. After chemotherapy-resistant SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells were treated with chemotherapy and/or OBP-301, apoptosis induction and DNA damage status were assessed by western blot and flow cytometry. Western blot analysis showed that CDDP and DOX induced apoptosis, which was confirmed by the increased expression of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2a). In contrast, OBP-301 slightly induced the expression of cleaved PARP in MNNG/HOS cells, but not SaOS-2 cells (Fig. 2b). When combined with chemotherapy, OBP-301 enhanced the chemotherapy-induced cleaved PARP expression in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 2c). Compared with enhancement of cleaved PARP expression, we could not detect the expression of different apoptosis indicator cleaved caspase-3 (data not shown). In contrast, the expression of DNA damage biomarker γ-H2AX was increased in combination therapy compared to monotherapy (Fig. 2c). TUNEL assay demonstrated that the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells was significantly increased in combination therapy compared to monotherapy (Fig. 2d and Suppl. Fig. 3). Moreover, flow cytometric analysis also revealed that OBP-301 significantly increased the percentage of the sub-G1 population, which is a fraction of apoptotic cells, in the chemotherapy-treated SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 3). These results indicate that OBP-301 mediates its chemosensitizing effect through the enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and DNA damage.
Anti-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins, such as BCL2, MCL1, and BCL-XL, play a critical role in the resistance to chemotherapeutic agents19. To clarify the molecular mechanism underlying the chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301, we assessed whether OBP-301 affects the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins in chemotherapy-resistant SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells. Western blot analysis showed that OBP-301 dose-dependently downregulated the anti-apoptotic MCL1 protein that was highly expressed in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 4a). The expression of other BCL2 family proteins BCL2 and BCL-XL was also downregulated after OBP-301 infection in SaOS-2 cells, but OBP-301 slightly increased BCL2 expression and BCL-XL expression was very low in MNNG/HOS cells. Moreover, when combined with chemotherapy, OBP-301 induced MCL1 suppression in consistent with enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 4b). These results suggest that OBP-301 enhances chemotherapy-induced apoptosis via MCL1 suppression.
To confirm the role of MCL1 suppression in the OBP-301-mediated enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, we further assessed the effect of MCL1 knockdown by RNA interference on the chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. When combined with chemotherapeutic agents, MCL1 siRNA efficiently suppressed MCL1 expression and enhanced the chemotherapy-induced apoptosis as well as OBP-301 in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 4c). These results suggest that MCL1 suppression plays a crucial role in the OBP-301-mediated enhancement of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.
We recently revealed that OBP-30120 and tumor suppressor p53-expressing OBP-301 (OBP-702)21 increase the expression of cellular microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-7 and miR-93/106b, respectively, via activation of transcription factor E2F1 in human cancer cells. miR-15, miR-16, and miR-29 suppress MCL1 expression in human malignant tumor cells22. Moreover, a recent report has suggested that miR-16 and miR-29 are downregulated and miR-15 is associated with chemosensitivity in human osteosarcoma cells23. To investigate the underlying mechanism of OBP-301-mediated MCL1 suppression, we determined whether OBP-301 upregulates MCL1-targeted miRNAs (miR-15, miR-16, miR-29) via E2F1 activation in human osteosarcoma cells. OBP-301 dose-dependently upregulated the expression of E2F1 and MCL1-targeted miRNAs (miR-15a, miR-16, miR-29a) in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 5a,b). In contrast, when infected with E2F1-expressing Ad-E2F1 or control E1A-deleted adenovirus dl312, Ad-E2F1 increased E2F1 expression and inversely decreased MCL1 expression in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 5c). Moreover, Ad-E2F1 significantly increased the expression of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-29a in SaOS-2 cells, although MNNG/HOS cells showed increased expression of miR-15a and miR-16, but not miR-29a, after Ad-E2F1 infection (Fig. 5d). These results suggest that OBP-301 induces MCL1-targeted miRNAs via E2F1 activation in human osteosarcoma cells.
To evaluate the effect of MCL1-targeted miRNAs in the chemosensitivity of human osteosarcoma cells, we introduced exogenous miR-15a, miR-16, miR-29a or control miRNA into SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells. Only miR-29a efficiently suppressed MCL1 expression in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 5e). Moreover, miR-29a enhanced the chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells (Fig. 5f). These results suggest that OBP-301 enhances chemotherapy-induced apoptosis through miR-29-mediated MCL1 suppression in human osteosarcoma cells.
Finally, to assess the in vivo antitumor effect of combination therapy with chemotherapy and OBP-301, we used a subcutaneous MNNG/HOS xenograft tumor model because only MNNG/HOS cells have tumorigenic ability24. OBP-301 or PBS (mock) was injected into the tumors every week, whereas cisplatin and doxorubicin were intraperitoneally injected 2 days after OBP-301 injection for 3 cycles. The combination of chemotherapeutic agents and OBP-301 significantly suppressed tumor growth when compared to mock or monotherapy with chemotherapeutic agents or OBP-301 (Fig. 6a,b). On histopathological analysis, there were large necrotic areas with decreased Ki-67 expression in the combination therapy-treated tumors as compared to mock-treated, OBP-301- or chemotherapy-treated tumors (Fig. 6c). Combination therapy with OBP-301 and chemotherapy significantly decreased the number of Ki67-positive proliferating cells within tumor tissues compared to mock or monotherapy (Fig. 6d). These results suggest that OBP-301 has the therapeutic potential to enhance the chemotherapy-mediated antitumor effect in human osteosarcoma tumors.
The exploration of the molecular mechanism underlying chemoresistance and the development of novel strategies for enhancing chemosensitivity are pivotal approaches to improve the clinical outcome of osteosarcoma patients. The present study demonstrated that a tumor-specific replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus OBP-301 induced miR-29 upregulation via E2F1 activation, which resulted in suppression of anti-apoptotic BCL2 family protein MCL1 in chemotherapy-resistant human osteosarcoma cells. OBP-301 synergistically enhanced the chemosensitivity in human osteosarcoma cells by promoting chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and DNA damage. Although oncolytic adenoviruses hTERT-Ad25, SG51126, and OBP-30127,28,29,30 showed chemosensitizing effects in epithelial types of malignant tumor cells, the precise molecular mechanism underlying the adenovirus-mediated chemosensitization remained unclear, especially in human osteosarcoma cells. Virally triggered MCL1 depletion may be a novel, promising strategy to overcome chemoresistance in human osteosarcomas. Moreover, activation of miRNA networks targeting MCL1 is essential for this clinically relevant chemovirotherapy.
MCL1 is overexpressed in various types of human tumor cells31; thus, MCL1 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target. Some reports have suggested that MCL1 suppression by MCL1 siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapy in human cancers including sarcomas7, hepatocellular carcinomas32, pancreatic cancers33 and gastric cancers34. MCL1-targeted drugs, such as small molecule inhibitors, have recently been developed to improve the chemotherapy-mediated antitumor effect in human cancer cells19. However, MCL1 suppression also induces apoptosis in normal hematopoietic cells, such as B and T lymphocytes35, polymorphonuclear leukocytes36, macrophages37 and hematopoietic stem cells38. To avoid the cytotoxicity of MCL1 suppression in normal hematopoietic cells, OBP-301-mediated tumor-specific MCL1 ablation might be clinically beneficial.
Regarding the molecular mechanism underlying the oncolytic adenovirus-mediated MCL1 suppression, we demonstrated that OBP-301 upregulated MCL1-targeted miRNAs, such as miR-15, miR-16 and miR-29, and miR-29 overexpression efficiently suppressed MCL1 expression in human osteosarcoma cells. Recent reports have shown that MCL1 is a direct target of miR-29a, which binds to 3′-UTR of MCL1, in human tumor cells including SaOS-2 cells39,40,41. Regarding the function of miR-29 in tumor development, the miR-29 family is frequently downregulated in human cancers42 including osteosarcomas43, suggesting the tumor-suppressive role of the miR-29 family. In fact, our data demonstrated that administration of a miR-29 mimic enhanced the chemotherapy-induced apoptosis like MCL1 siRNA. Moreover, miR-29 negatively regulates the expression of stemness-related markers, such as Oct3/4, Sox2 and Nanog, and subsequently suppresses the proliferation, sphere formation and chemoresistance of human osteosarcoma stem cells43. Therefore, OBP-301-mediated miR-29 activation may have broad therapeutic potential in addition to chemosensitization through MCL1 depletion. However, miR-15a, miR-16 and miR-29a may not be the only MCL1-targeted miRNAs because we cannot exclude the possible involvement of other miRNAs in regulating MCL1 expression. Comprehensive miRNA expression profiling by using either a miRNA microarray or a miRNA PCR array, therefore, will be necessary to clarify this issue in the future study.
OBP-301 treatment increased the level of miR-29a in SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells. However, E1A-deficient Ad-E2F1-induced E2F1 overexpression was not sufficient to increase the level of miR-29a in MNNG/HOS cells. Previous report has suggested that adenoviral E1A accumulation is necessary to suppress MCL1 expression in adenovirus-infected cells44. Adenovirus induces E2F1 expression via E1A-mediated inactivation of E2F1-suppressive retinoblastoma (Rb) protein and activation of free E2F145. Since SaOS-2 cells lack Rb protein, but HOS cells, which are parental cells of MNNG/HOS cells, have Rb protein46, inactivation of E2F1-suppressive Rb protein in addition to E2F1 overexpression may be necessary to increase the level of miR-29a in MNNG/HOS cells.
We and our collaborators recently confirmed the antitumor effect of OBP-301 in human osteosarcoma cells as a monotherapy47,48. A Phase I clinical trial in the United States showed the safety and feasibility of intratumoral injection of OBP-301 in patients with various types of advanced solid tumors including sarcomas49. Although we have recently confirmed more profound antitumor effect of p53-expressing OBP-702 compared to OBP-301 against human osteosarcoma cells21, the safety and feasibility of OBP-702 treatment in cancer patients remains to be elucidated. For future clinical application, we focused on the therapeutic potential of OBP-301 in a multimodal antitumor strategy with chemotherapy in this study. Recent evidence has shown not only the antitumor effect, but also the chemosensitizing effect of oncolytic adenoviruses in human cancer cells18,50. For example, we confirmed that OBP-301 enhances the antitumor effect of chemotherapeutic agents, such as docetaxel27, gemcitabine28, CDDP 29,30, and paclitaxel30, in human cancer cells with telomerase activities. In this study, we demonstrated the potential of OBP-301 as a chemosensitizing reagent against osteosarcoma cells in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301 was more striking in in vivo experiment compared to in vitro experiment. The difference between in viro and in vivo chemosensitizing effect of OBP-301 may be in part due to different frequency of treatment, one time (in vitro) and three times (in vivo). Short-term in vivo experiment may be necessary to precisely confirm the apoptosis induction status within tumor tissues as well as in vitro experiment. In contrast, quiescent tumor cells are predominantly more resistant to chemotherapeutic agents than proliferating tumor cells within tumor tissues51. We recently reported that OBP-301 suppressed cell viability in chemoradiotherapy-resistant quiescent human gastric cancer stem cells through induction of cell cycle reentry52. In this report, OBP-301 also enhanced the chemotherapy-mediated antitumor effect against dormant human gastric cancer stem cell-driven tumors. OBP-301-mediated modulation of the cell cycle status may also attenuate the chemoresistance of dormant human osteosarcoma cells within tumor tissues.
Our findings suggest that miR-29-mediated suppression of anti-apoptotic factor MCL1 was a critical factor for the enhancement of chemosensitivity in human osteosarcoma cells. Thus, virus-mediated telomerase-specific targeting of MCL-1 expression offers a promising strategy to improve the clinical benefits of conventional chemotherapy in osteosarcoma patients. Further clinical studies are warranted to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of this multimodal combination therapy.
Four human osteosarcoma cell lines were used in the study. HOS and SaOS-2 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Satoru Kyo (Shimane University, Izumo, Japan). MNNG/HOS cells were purchased from DS Pharma Biomedical, and 143B cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). HOS and SaOS-2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium. MNNG/HOS cells were maintained in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium containing 1% nonessential amino acids. 143B cells were maintained in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium containing 0.015mg/ml 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine. MNNG/HOS cells transfected with the firefly luciferase plasmid vector (MNNG/HOS-Luc) were maintained in medium containing 0.2mg/ml Geneticin (G418; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (St. Louis, MO, USA), 100U/ml penicillin and 100mg/ml streptomycin. The cells were routinely maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
Construction and characterization of the recombinant telomerase-specific replication-competent adenovirus vector OBP-301 (telomelysin) was previously reported16,17. Replication-deficient adenovirus vector expressing E2F1 (Ad-E2F1) was used to induce E2F1 expression in infected cells, as previously reported53. E1A-deleted adenovirus vector (dl312) was used as a control vector. OBP-301, Ad-E2F1 and dl312 were purified by using CsCl step gradient ultracentrifugation followed by CsCl linear gradient ultracentrifugation. This study was approved by the Recombinant DNA Experiment Safety Committee and carried out in accordance with the approved protocol (Approved ID: 12015).
Cells were seeded on 96-well plates at a density of 1×103 cells/well 24hours before administration of chemotherapeutic drugs or viral infection. In monotherapy, cells were treated with CDDP or DOX at a concentration of 0, 0.1, 1, 5, or 10μg/ml for 24hours or infected with OBP-301 at multiplicity of infections (MOIs) of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, or 100 plaque forming units (PFUs)/cell for 72hours. In combined chemotherapy, cells were treated with chemotherapeutic agents at the ratio used clinically (CDDP:DOX=4:1). Moreover, in combination therapy with chemotherapy and OBP-301, two days after viral infection with OBP-301 at the indicated MOIs, cells were further treated with chemotherapy (CDDP:DOX=4:1) for 24hours. Cell viability was determined using the Cell Proliferation Kit II (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The combination index was calculated with CalcuSyn software (BioSoft, Inc., Cambridge, UK), and the computation of the combination index was based on the methods of Chou and Talalay54.
SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells seeded in a 100-mm dish at a density of 2×105 cells/dish were infected with OBP-301, Ad-E2F1, or dl312 at the indicated MOIs for 72hours. Cells were treated with CDDP or DOX at the indicated doses for 24hours. Cells were transfected with 10nM MCL1 siRNA, control siRNA, Pre-miR-15a, Pre-miR-16, Pre-miR-29a, or control Pre-miRNA (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) 48hours before chemotherapy treatment and treated with CDDP or DOX at the indicated doses for 24hours. Whole cell lysates were prepared in a lysis buffer (50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete Mini; Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Proteins were electrophoresed on 8–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P; GE Health Care, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membranes were blocked with Blocking-One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) at room temperature for 30minutes. The primary antibodies used were: mouse anti-Ad5 E1A monoclonal antibody (mAb) (BD PharMingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA); rabbit anti-PARP polyclonal antibody (pAb), mouse anti-γ-H2AX mAb (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Temecula, CA, USA), rabbit anti-MCL1 mAb, rabbit anti-BCL-2 mAb, rabbit anti-BCL-XL mAb, and rabbit anti-E2F1 mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); and mouse anti-β-actin mAb (Sigma-Aldrich). The secondary antibodies used were: horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies against rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare), mouse IgG (GE Healthcare) or goat IgG (Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA, USA). Immunoreactive bands on the blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence substrates (ECL Plus; GE Healthcare).
SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells seeded in a 4 well glass plate at a density of 5×103 cells/well were treated with or without CDDP (5μg/ml), DOX (1μg/ml), and/or OBP-301 (10 and 50 MOIs, respectively). In monotherapy, cells were treated with chemotherapy for 24hours or infected with OBP-301 for 72hours. In combination therapy, two days after viral infection with OBP-301, cells were further treated with chemotherapy for 24hours. Cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 10minutes. Cells were stained by nick end-labelling method to detect the fragmented DNA, and Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) to observe the nuclear morphology of the cells. Briefly, cells were incubated with TdT reaction solution (400U terminal transferase and 5 nmol Fluorescen-12-2′-deoxy-uridine-5′-triphosphate in 1.2ml TUNEL Dilution Buffer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)). The cells were then stained by Hoechst 33342 (20μM) for 5minutes at room temperature. The photographs of immunostained sections were obtained by fluorescent microscopy. The percentage of immunoreactive cells for TUNEL was calculated in five randomly selected fields in each group.
To evaluate the sub-G1 population, which is an apoptosis indicator, the cell cycle state was analyzed by flow cytometry, as previously reported21. SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells seeded in a 100-mm dish at a density of 1×106 cells/dish were treated with or without CDDP (5μg/ml), DOX (1μg/ml), and/or OBP-301 (10 and 50 MOIs, respectively). In monotherapy, cells were treated with chemotherapy for 24hours or infected with OBP-301 for 72hours. In combination therapy, two days after viral infection with OBP-301, cells were further treated with chemotherapy for 24hours. Cells were trypsinized and resuspended in original supernatant to ensure that attached and nonattached cells were analyzed. Cells stained with propidium iodide were analyzed using a FACS array (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
To evaluate the expression of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-29a in tumor cells after OBP-301 infection, SaOS-2 and MNNG/HOS cells were seeded on 6-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells/well and 24hours later infected with OBP-301 at MOIs of 0, 1, 5, 10, 50, or 100 PFU/cell. Three days after virus infection, total RNA was extracted from cells using a miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). After synthesis of cDNA from 10ng of total RNA using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems), the expression of miR-15a, miR-16, or miR-29a was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) using the Applied Biosystems StepOnePlusTM real-time PCR system. The expression levels of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-29a were defined from the threshold cycle (Ct), and relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method after normalization with reference to the expression of U6 small nuclear RNA.
Animal experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of Okayama University School of Medicine (No. OKU-2011062). MNNG/HOS-Luc cells (5×106 cells per site) were inoculated into the flanks of 5- to 6-week-old female BALB/c nu/nu mice (CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Palpable tumors developed within 21 days and were permitted to grow to approximately 5 to 6mm in diameter. At that stage, a 50μL volume of solution containing OBP-301 (5×107 PFU) or PBS was injected into the tumors every week for 3 cycles. Cisplatin (4mg/kg body weight) and doxorubicin (2mg/kg body weight) were intraperitoneally injected 2 days after OBP-301 injection for 3 cycles. Four mice were used for each group. To monitor tumor progression, the substrate luciferin (VivoGlo Luciferin; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was intraperitoneally injected at a dose of 3mg/kg body weight. Images were collected in the prone position after luciferin injection with the Xenogen IVIS Lumina Imaging System (Caliper Life Sciences, Cheshire, UK), and photons emitted from the flanks were quantified by using Xenogen Living Image Software (Caliper Life Science).
Tumors were fixed in 10% neutralized formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Paraffin-embedded sections (4μm) were prepared for hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical examination. Immunostaining with rabbit anti-Ki67mAb (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) using standard techniques was used to detect proliferating tumor cells within tumor tissues. The photographs of immunostained sections were obtained by light microscopy. The number of immunoreactive cells for Ki67 was calculated in five randomly selected fields in each tumor by using ImageJ software.
Data are expressed as means±SD. Determination of significant differences was assessed using the Student’s t-test. P values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
How to cite this article: Osaki, S. et al. Ablation of MCL1 expression by virally induced microRNA-29 reverses chemoresistance in human osteosarcomas. Sci. Rep. 6, 28953; doi: 10.1038/srep28953 (2016).
The authors thank Dr. Satoru Kyo (Shimane University) for providing the HOS and SaOS-2 cells, and Tomoko Sueishi and Setsuko Tanabe for their excellent technical support. This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan (to T. Fujiwara; No. 10103827, No. 13801426, No. 14525167) and grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (to T. Fujiwara; No. 25293283, T. Sasaki and T. Ozaki; No. 25293323).
Yasuo Urata is the president and CEO of Oncolys BioPharma, Inc., the manufacturer of OBP-301 (telomelysin). Hiroshi Tazawa and Toshiyoshi Fujiwara are consultants for Oncolys BioPharma, Inc.
Author Contributions H.T., J.H., T.Oz. and Tos.F. developed the concept and designed research; S.O., Y.Y., T.Om., K.S., T.Ko. and A.Y. performed research and acquired data; Tom.F., T.S., T.Ku. and S.K. analyzed and interpreted data; Y.U. supplied materials; and S.O., H.T. and Tos.F. wrote and reviewed the manuscript.