Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 28903.
Published online 2016 June 29. doi:  10.1038/srep28903
PMCID: PMC4926117

Photonic Programmable Tele-Cloning Network


The concept of quantum teleportation allows an unknown quantum states to be broadcasted and processed in a distributed quantum network. The quantum information injected into the network can be diluted to distant multi-copies by quantum cloning and processed by arbitrary quantum logic gates which were programed in advance in the network quantum state. A quantum network combines simultaneously these fundamental quantum functions could lead to new intriguing applications. Here we propose a photonic programmable telecloning network based on a four-photon interferometer. The photonic network serves as quantum gate, quantum cloning and quantum teleportation and features experimental advantage of high brightness by photon recycling.

Quantum network1,2,3, a distributed quantum entangled state4,5, can spread and process the quantum information from external quantum state by injecting into its local network nodes. Then the post-processed quantum information could be extracted from the distant nodes of the quantum network. This paradigm, derived from the seminal concept of quantum teleportation6,7,8, has been developed into many novel quantum protocols, ranging from complex quantum state teleportation9,10, telecloning11,12, programmable quantum gates13,14, quantum gates using teleportation15 to one-way quantum computation16,17,18.

The cloning, transporting and processing are three basic information operations. An optimal quantum cloning machine19,20,21 is built to dilute N copies of initial identical quantum bits into M identical output copies with a maximal fidelity of 1  (M  N)/(MN + 2M), which does not violate the quantum no-cloning theorem22. The quantum cloning machine23,24 can be implemented by a quantum network in the style of quantum teleportation, called quantum telecloning11, thus the quantum information copies are distributed among distant network nodes. In addition to the spread of quantum information, the network can also be programmed13 as a quantum computer25 to process the information simultaneously.

In this work, we propose a photonic quantum network of dual capacities for conveying and processing quantum information simultaneously – a photonic programmable telecloning machine. One copy of the quantum information was infused with the photon network through a Bell-state measurement. The information is further operated by a desired quantum gate programed in the entangled state of network. Two distant nodes are designed to output two copies of the post-processed information independently at the optimal quantum-cloning performance. In our photonic quantum network, four entangled photons are produced by the double emission of spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in nonlinear crystal26. A photon recycling technology is used to carry the external quantum information, which will remarkably improve the efficiency of experimental realization.


The programmable telecloning network11,14 is prepared in the four-party entangled state (up to normalization for simplicity) |ψnetright angle bracket1234 = 2|0000right angle bracket + |0101right angle bracket + |0110right angle bracket + |1001right angle bracket + |1010right angle bracket + 2|1111right angle bracket and is transformed by a quantum gate U on the port 1. Thus the resulted network state shown in Fig. 1 has the ability to spread and process quantum information. The photon 2 is depolarized and traced out from the network, which resulted in a mixed-state network An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m1.jpg. The input quantum information is carried by the recycled and reinitialized photon from port 2 with quantum state An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m2.jpg, where the new photonic mode is tagged as X and An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m3.jpg.

Figure 1
Programmable telecloning network.

To inject the quantum information from photon X into the network, we fuse it with the port 1 by a Bell-state measurement onto a quantum stateAn external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m4.jpg with An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m5.jpg. After the success of injection, the remained network state isAn external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m6.jpg. We find that the output ports 3 and 4 have quantum state An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m7.jpg and An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m8.jpg, which both are of quantum density matrixAn external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m9.jpg with (αβ′)T = U(α β)T. These cloned quantum states are of fidelity 5/6 with programmable-gate-processed quantum state U(α β)T.

When the result of Bell measurement for the injection process is not |00right angle bracket + 11right angle bracket, but other three Bell states, the quantum information in the network will be k(α β)T, where σk is one of the Pauli operators {σX, σY, σZ}. If the quantum gate U does not commutate with the Pauli operators, the Pauli errors presented between the quantum gate U and quantum state (α β)T cannot be corrected by some universal method. In this sense, the programmable gate features a probabilistic nature with success probability of 1/4 and thus the partial Bell-state measurement realized by using linear quantum optics is not more a bottleneck.

The proposed photonic network

We propose a photonic interferometer27 shown in Fig. 2 to realize the programmable telecloning network, where the horizontal (H) and vertical (V) polarization are used to encode the quantum state |0right angle bracket and |1right angle bracket, respectively. The photons are produced by type-II SPDC26 and double emission is exploited to engineer the telecloning network. An additional half wave plate reverse the state in one SPDC mode, thus the initial photons state (up to normalization) is An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m10.jpg. According to the nature of bosons, when two identical photons present in a same mode, the probability amplitude will be enhanced by a factor An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m11.jpg, the quantum state of four photons is An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m12.jpg. Two following beam splitters route the four photons to four separate ports 1~4 with a success probability 1/4, resulting in a four-party entangled state |ψnetright angle bracket1234, that is

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is srep28903-m13.jpg
Figure 2
A nonlinear crystal pumped by a UV pulsed laser produces double IR entangled photon pairs by SPDC process.

This photonic state will serve as the quantum network for pure telecloning. Furthermore, a quantum gate U is programmed in the network state by sending the photon in port 1 through wave plates with a quantum operation U. Now, the network state U|ψnetright angle bracket1234 , as programmable telecloning machine, is ready to spread and process quantum information.

In general, the external quantum information carrier will be a heralded single photon from a third photon pair of the SPDC emission. However, the SPDC process is probabilistic and the statistics of photon pairs follow the Poisson distribution. A trade-off between the brightness and the visibility of photon interference must be considered. An emission probability of a few percent is extensively used in quantum optical experiments28,29. Here, in our proposal, the photon in the idle port 2 of the network is exploited to serve as the carrier. Before the photon 2 is recycled, its information is erased through a depolarized channel. This can be viewed as we construct a mixed-state programmable telecloning network only with three ports 1, 3 and 4 (one as input port and two as output port).

The recycling photon, labelled as photon X, can be initialized to encode a quantum bit. Then it is send to the input port and joined with the photon 1 by Bell measurement. After a success detection of |1XH, 11Hright angle bracket + |1XV, 11Vright angle bracket, the quantum bit in the photon X is injected into the network and concurrently processed by the same network. Now, the two photons in the output port 3 and 4 are two copies of the post-processed cloning state of optimal fidelity 5/6 with the post-processed prefect state.

In this sense, our photonic programmable telecloning network combines three foundational quantum information processing modules: programmable quantum gate, quantum cloning and quantum teleportation. There are four main aspects cause the system working in a probabilistic nature. First, the double emission of SPDC has a probability p2. Second, using two beam splitters to prepare the four-port entangled network state has an efficiency of 1/4. Third, the desired Bell measurement event on one beam splitter is of average 1/4 efficiency. Last, the efficiency of coupling, propagation loss and single-photon detections.

The probability of stochastic emission in SPDC is dominant factor for the low system efficiency. To improve the system efficiency, more pumping power can be used to increase the emission probability p. However, the noise contributed by the undesired high-order term emission will also increase. Thus a reasonable choice of the emission probability p is important. Here we simulate the system performance by random sampling 200 quantum state in the qubit Bloch sphere and investigate how the fidelity of telecloning change with the emission probability p, where the quantum gate U is set as identity gate I.

The simulation is performed in multi-mode phase space30. The photonic source is two-mode squeezed vacuum state and the single-photon detector only distinguish zero and non-zero photon numbers. Figure 3 shows the simulation results. We find that under small emission probability p, the average fidelity approaches to the theoretical vale 0.83. Then the fidelity dropped as the emission probability raising. In broad region of emission probability (from 0.01 to 0.1), all the telecloning fidelity is above the classical limit 0.66. Thus, to demonstrate the quantum nature of the telecloning network, we can appropriately use a high emission probability. However, to achieve the optimal cloning fidelity, low emission probability is essential.

Figure 3
The performance of telecloning network.


We have presented a new photonic quantum network with three basic quantum functions in quantum information processing. A programmable quantum computing on the diluted input information by quantum cloning in a distributed pattern on a versatile quantum network may find interest not only in the controlled distribution of quantum information, but also the inspiration of secure quantum computing.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, W. and Chen, M.-C. Photonic Programmable Tele-Cloning Network. Sci. Rep. 6, 28903; doi: 10.1038/srep28903 (2016).


Author Contributions W.L. and M.-C.C. developed the protocol and wrote the manuscript.


  • Kimble H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Duan L.-M. & Monroe C. Colloquium: Quantum networks with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1209–1224 (2010).
  • Reiserer A. & Rempe G. Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379–1418 (2015).
  • Horodecki R., Horodecki P., Horodecki M. & Horodecki K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009).
  • Raimond J. M., Brune M. & Haroche S. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565–582 (2001).
  • Bennett C. H. et al. . Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993). [PubMed]
  • Bouwmeester D. et al. . Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390, 575–579 (1997).
  • Pirandola S., Eisert J., Weedbrook C., Furusawa A. & Braunstein S. L. Advances in quantum teleportation. Nat Photon 9, 641–652 (2015).
  • Zhang Q. et al. . Experimental quantum teleportation of a two-qubit composite system. Nat Phys. 2, 678–682 (2006).
  • Wang X.-L. et al. . Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature 518, 516–519 (2015). [PubMed]
  • Murao M., Jonathan D., Plenio M. B. & Vedral V. Quantum telecloning and multiparticle entanglement. Phys. Rev. A. 59, 156–161 (1999).
  • Zhao Z. et al. . Experimental Realization of Optimal Asymmetric Cloning and Telecloning via Partial Teleportation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 030502 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Nielsen M. A. & Chuang I. L. Programmable Quantum Gate Arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 321–324 (1997).
  • Yu Y., Feng J. & Zhan M. Multi-output programmable quantum processor. Phys. Rev. A. 66, 052310 (2002).
  • Gao W.-B. et al. . Teleportation-based realization of an optical quantum two-qubit entangling gate. PNAS 107, 20869–20874 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Raussendorf R. & Briegel H. J. A One-Way Quantum Computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Popescu S. Knill-Laflamme-Milburn Linear Optics Quantum Computation as a Measurement-Based Computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250501 (2007). [PubMed]
  • Briegel H. J., Browne D. E., Dür W., Raussendorf R. & Van den Nest M. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nat Phys. 5, 19–26 (2009).
  • Gisin N. & Massar S. Optimal Quantum Cloning Machines. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2153–2156 (1997).
  • Huang Y.-F. et al. . Optical realization of universal quantum cloning. Phys. Rev. A. 64, 012315 (2001).
  • Nagali E. et al. . Experimental Optimal Cloning of Four-Dimensional Quantum States of Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 073602 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Wootters W. K. & Zurek W. H. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802–803(1982).
  • Fan H. et al. . Quantum cloning machines and the applications. Physics Reports 544, 241–322 (2014).
  • Scarani V., Iblisdir S., Gisin N. & Acín A. Quantum cloning. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1225–1256 (2005).
  • Ladd T. D. et al. . Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Kwiat P. G., Waks E., White A. G., Appelbaum I. & Eberhard P. H. Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A. 60, R773–R776 (1999).
  • Pan J.-W. et al. . Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012).
  • Lu C.-Y. et al. . Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nat Phys. 3, 91–95 (2007).
  • Yao X.-C. et al. . Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nat Photon 6, 225–228 (2012).
  • Takeoka M., Jin R.-B. & Sasaki M. Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing. New Journal of Physics 17, 043030 (2015).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group