|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Typically, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is performed after DNA isolation. Real-time PCR (qPCR), also known as direct qPCR in mammalian cells with weak membranes, is a common technique using crude samples subjected to preliminary boiling to elute DNA. However, applying this methodology to prokaryotic cells, which have solid cell walls, in contrast to mammalian cells which immediately burst in water, can result in poor detection. We successfully achieved PCR elongation with the addition of 1.3 cfu of Cronobacter muytjensii to a newly developed direct qPCR master mix without performing any crude DNA extraction (detection limit of 1.6×100 cfu/ml for the test sample compared with a detection limit of 1.6×103 cfu/ml primarily for crude (boiling) or classical DNA isolation). We revealed that the chromosomal DNA retained in prokaryotic cells can function as a PCR template, similarly to the mechanism in in situ PCR. Elucidating this reaction mechanism may contribute to the development of an innovative master mix for direct qPCR to detect genes in a single bacterium with solid cell walls and might lead to numerous novel findings in prokaryotic genomics research.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a useful tool for the rapid detection and analysis of targeted microorganisms (particularly those that take a long time to grow or are difficult to grow artificially) in not only biochemical research samples but also food, environmental, or clinical samples1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Typical PCR requires time- or money-intensive DNA isolation to remove numerous PCR inhibitors8, although the DNA isolation may be partially conducted in an automated machine9.
Mammalian cells have weak cell membranes but do not have cell walls, whereas bacteria possess both10; thus, the chromosomal DNA of mammalian cells can easily be eluted from cells11. To remove the time- and money-intensive DNA isolation step, real-time PCR with crude DNA extraction (intermediate direct qPCR) through boiling has been performed with clinical samples, including hair roots. Concretely, intermediate direct qPCR has been performed by using commercially available kits, such as MightyAmp® DNA Polymerase Ver.2, to suppress the function of PCR inhibitors in experimental samples (Takara-Bio, Ohtsu, Japan)11. The goal of this experiment was to conduct simple and rapid genomic research and routine food/environmental/clinical testing to detect DNA from nearly a single prokaryotic cell with solid cell walls. Direct qPCR with crude DNA extraction (intermediate direct qPCR) for mammalian cells is commonly applied for the detection of prokaryotic cells without any modification. This method may prevent the identification of new information regarding prokaryotic cells, as a consequence of the poor detection limit, which is at best 102 cfu/ml, with average values of 103 – 104 cfu/ml or g. In detail, various pathogenic bacteria and fungi have been detected in faecal samples and nasopharyngeal aspirates through intermediate direct qPCR using crude DNA extraction through boiling, although the associated microorganisms in these samples, unlike mammalian cells, have solid cell walls12,13,14. When considering both the recovery rate of DNA extraction from cells and the contamination with PCR inhibitors originating from the tested sample matrices, crude DNA extraction methods, such as boiling, are not recommended to obtain the lower detection limit for a microorganism15.
Therefore, we have previously developed a series of simple and rapid real-time PCR (qPCR) techniques (direct qPCR) that do not require any DNA extraction, such as boiling, and we have applied the techniques to milk, infant formula, and blood samples16,17,18,19,20,21. The direct qPCR master mix includes a typical, real-time PCR master mix and other components, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), to adsorb PCR inhibitors from the test samples, a non-ionic detergent to modify the structures and dissolve the proteins of bacterial cell walls, and a calcium chelating agent18,19,20,21.
We had initially determined that this direct qPCR master mix (including the intermediate direct qPCR master mix) is more specialized than normal PCR master mix in adsorbing many of the PCR inhibitors present in samples20,22. However, the recovery rate of chromosomal DNA eluted from bacterial cells with this direct qPCR master mix remains unknown18,19,20,21. The soft membranes of mammalian cells easily burst under hyperosmolarity or hypoosmolarity, thus allowing intermediate direct qPCR elongation through the additional boiling of crude DNA extractions23,24. However, unlike mammalian cells, prokaryotic cells have solid cell walls10,25. Nonetheless, the mechanism of amplification when prokaryotic cells (and fungi) are directly added into a commercial direct qPCR master mix has not been elucidated12,13,14,18,19,20,21.
Indeed, there is a demand for new and precise methodologies for direct qPCR to obtain much lower detection limits for prokaryotic cells, including a more suitable direct qPCR master mix for prokaryotic cells12,13,14. Thus, in the present study, we present a viable method for in situ PCR that facilitates the physical elongation of DNA in prokaryotic cells concerning our direct qPCR. Herein, we succeeded in effectively elongating a target gene in nearly one prokaryotic cell of Cronobacter without performing any DNA extraction such as boiling. Because a low detection limit has never been obtained for prokaryotic cells through intermediate direct qPCR using crude (boiling) or classical approaches involving preventive DNA isolation12,13,14, here we report the detailed outcomes of the present study.
To evaluate the disruption rate of C. muytjensii cells during PCR thermal cycling, PCR elongation was performed using a direct qPCR master mix for the pellet and supernatant obtained from C. muytjensii previously subjected to 50 rounds of PCR thermal cycling in physiological saline or direct qPCR components (see the Methods section) (Table 1). The direct qPCR master mix comprised of the direct qPCR components, in which the volume of sterile water (SW) was reduced to 2.7μl, and the typical PCR master mix including Taq, specific (ompA) primers for C. muytjensii, and SYBR Green I.
The effects of matrices with direct qPCR components before and after PCR thermal cycling on PCR elongation were evaluated, to accurately evaluate Table 1 (Table 2). With respect to the samples amplified without thermal cycling (hereafter termed non-heated), we used C. muytjensii in physiological saline. A comparison of the Ct values for the suspension (corresponding to Pellet in Table 1) and Supernatant (Table 1) obtained through centrifugation revealed that the Ct values for the Pellet group were approximately 5 Ct units lower than those of the Supernatant group. In contrast, given the experimentally determined PCR efficiency (average of 2.1 nearing theoretical value of 2.0) calculated in the range of 2.5×103 to 2.5×106 cfu/PCR for C. muytjensii in saline (Table 2), the number of PCR amplicons increased approximately 101-fold (2.13.2-fold) after 3.2 cycles of PCR, and the Pellet group was approximately 5 Ct units lower than the Supernatant group, thus suggesting that the DNA amount in the Pellet group was 2.15-fold (1.6log10-fold) higher than that in the Supernatant group26. In relation to the C. muytjensii suspension with direct qPCR components, the Ct values for the Pellet group were 8.2 to 8.3 Ct units lower than those of the Supernatant group, regardless of PCR thermal cycling parameters (Table 1). Concerning the inhibitory effect of direct qPCR components compared with saline, no significant differences were observed before or after PCR thermal cycling between the Pellet and Supernatant groups (Table 2). The PCR efficiencies were calculated in a range from 2.5×103 to 2.5×106 cfu/PCR for C. muytjensii in the Pellet and Supernatant groups with and without PCR thermal cycling, and the efficiency values were 2.2 (Pellet with non-heated direct qPCR components), 2.1 (Supernatant with non-heated components), 2.1 (Pellet with heated components), and 2.1 (Supernatant with heated components). These calculations suggest that the DNA amounts in the Pellet groups could be 2.18.2– 2.28.3-fold (2.6 – 2.8log10-fold) higher than those in the Supernatant groups, regardless of PCR thermal cycling (Table 2).
In addition, the Ct values of the Pellet and Supernatant groups for C. muytjensii suspended in the direct qPCR components after PCR thermal cycling were by 6.6 to 6.7 higher than those of the Pellet and Supernatant groups, prior to PCR thermal cycling (rows 5 and 6, and rows 7 and 8 in Table 1). These significantly higher Ct values did not result from the inhibitory effects of the sample matrices of the direct qPCR components after PCR thermal cycling, because there were no significant differences in the PCR elongation between saline and direct qPCR components before and after PCR thermal cycling (Table 2). However, the originally transparent direct qPCR components became cloudy after 50 cycles of PCR thermal cycling (see cloudy particles of the second half and right-side image in Fig. 1). When C. muytjensi was suspended in the cloudy direct qPCR components, and this was followed by PCR in newly prepared direct qPCR master mix, no inhibitory effects were observed (Table 2). This result suggests that C. muytjensii exposed to gradually producing clouded compartments of the direct qPCR components could not immediately function as a PCR template in successive direct qPCR, reflecting adsorption and/or folding of the cloudy components.
To estimate the number of non-heated C. muytjensii cells suspended in saline that were recovered in the Supernatant through centrifugation, live bacterial counts were obtained after growth on standard plate count agar medium (SPC agar: Eiken, Tokyo, Japan) for the Supernatant and Pellet groups (Table 1). The live C. muytjensii cell counts for the Pellet and Supernatant groups were 7.6±0.19 and 5.7±0.20log10 cfu/ml, respectively. This result shows that the live count for the Pellet group was approximately 1.9log10 cfu/ml unit higher (by 1<<2log10 cfu/ml unit order for raw counting data) than that of the Supernatant group. Regarding the non-heated C. muytjensii suspension in physiological saline, the PCR data were highly consistent with that of the SPC counts.
Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry (FCM) measurements using SYTO9 nucleic acid staining (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA), which penetrates into both intact and compromised cell walls/inner membranes of C. muytjensii, were performed to determine whether C. muytjensii retained their morphology after PCR thermal cycling (Figs 1, ,2,2, ,33).
As observed in the green fluorescent bacteria (Fig. 1), significant differences between the suspended pellets (corresponding to Pellet in Table 1) and supernatant (corresponding to Supernatant in Table 1) occurred with and without PCR thermal cycling, regardless of the different suspension matrices (saline and the direct qPCR components). In both matrices, after PCR thermal cycling, the green fluorescent bacteria retained the morphology of bacterial cells with chromosomal DNA, and the numbers were at the same level as that before PCR cycling for the suspended pellets (Fig. 1).
The FCM assays for C. muytjensii suspended in saline before and after PCR thermal cycling are shown in Fig. 2. Similarly, the FCM assays for C. muytjensii suspended in the direct qPCR components before and after thermal cycling are presented in Fig. 3. The plot number in the SYTO9 quadrant (+)/FL3-H(−) for the C. muytjensii suspension in saline after PCR thermal cycling was approximately 80% of that before thermal cycling (Fig. 2). In contrast, relative to the comparison between C. muytjensii suspended in the direct qPCR components before and after PCR thermal cycling, the plot number of SYTO9 (+)/FL3-H (−) for the C. muytjensii after PCR thermal cycling was the same as that of the associated cell suspension before PCR cycling (Fig. 3), suggesting that the C. muytjensii in the direct qPCR components was not degraded through PCR thermal cycling.
To determine whether PCR elongation through direct qPCR is similar to that in in situ PCR, we performed direct qPCR elongation (0, 15, or 30 cycles) on C. muytjensii with preliminary fixation A (4% paraformaldehyde, PFA) or B (methanol/acetic acid=3/1) (Fig. 4) and also performed FCM assays (SYTO9 staining) for the direct qPCR products at 0, 15, or 30 cycles on fixed cells (Tables 3 and and4).4). Although the chromosomal DNA was retained in C. muytjensii cells after fixation, the gel-electrophoresed bands for both supernatants obtained through centrifugation after direct qPCR with 30 cycles were positive (Fig. 4). In contrast, compared with the quadrant numbers of the SYTO9 (+)/FL3-H (−) in the FCM plots for the pellets obtained through centrifugation of the direct qPCR products at 0, 15, or 30 cycles, there were few significant differences between either fixation method (Fig. 4). These results suggest that a large part of the chromosomal DNA from the fixed cells was retained in the cells, but that PCR elongations took place; as a consequence, the elongated amplicons (ompA of 469bp) were released from the bacterial cells into the external direct qPCR master mix.
When PCR elongation and in situ PCR were conducted in the C. muytjensii cells, the typically short DNA amplicons (i.e., ompA of 469bp) were eluted from the bacterial cells (Fig. 4); thus, to ascertain that the PCR amplicons resulted from in situ PCR in bacterial cells, long DNA amplifications for C. muytjensii with no fixation (labelled as S in Fig. 5) or fixation B (methanol/acetic acid=3/1 labelled as B in Fig. 5) were performed. Figure 5 indicates that long DNA amplicons (16S–23S rRNA gene; approximately 2,450bp) were retained in bacterial cells. Next, DNA extraction was performed using the pellets obtained through centrifugation of the PCR products (followed by combining 20 PCR tubes) after direct qPCR. As presented in lanes 4 and 5 of Fig. 5, the presence of long DNA PCR amplicons (2,450bp) was confirmed. As a control, DNA extractions were performed on the pellets obtained through centrifugation of the PCR reaction mixture (combining 20 PCR tubes) prior to direct qPCR, and no bands were detected (lanes 2 and 3 in Fig. 5). These results suggest that the long DNA amplicons, at least in part, were retained in C. muytjensii cells.
We obtained 1ml of 1.6×100–1.6×105 cfu/ml of the C. sakazakii and C. muytjensii suspensions in SW, on which we performed direct qPCR amplification or qPCR elongation after crude DNA extraction (boil for 10min) or DNA purification using the FastPure DNA Kit (Takara Bio). The results are presented in Table 5. As a control, qPCR standards of the serially diluted purified chromosomal DNA are also shown in Table 5. The Ct values for the DNA (qPCR standards) and Cell (direct qPCR using Cronobacter cells) groups in Table 5 were approximately the same between the relevant cell numbers of C. sakazakii or C. muytjensii, suggesting that nearly 100% of the chromosomal DNA retained in the cells was available for direct qPCR elongation. The following detection limis for each method (Table 5) were observed: 1.6×100 cfu/ml (corresponding to 1.3×100 cfu/PCR) for DNA (qPCR standards) and Cell (direct qPCR), 1.6×102 (C. sakazakii) or 1.6×103 cfu/ml (C. muytjensii) for the Clean-up methods, and 1.6×103 cfu/ml (both Cronobacter species) for the Boil methods. Comparison of the detection limits for Cronobacter revealed that the direct qPCR system utilizing in situ PCR for prokaryotic cells was superior to qPCR following crude or purified DNA extraction, indicating a significant advantage in the robust detection of nearly one singular bacterial cell.
When the DNA or RNA recovery from bacteria is nearly 100%, using crude extraction techniques, such as boiling, before intermediate direct qPCR could succeed in detecting a single cell. However, as previously discussed, the detection limit for prokaryotic cells and fungi, through intermediate direct qPCR using boiling is at best 102 cfu/ml, with an average of 103 to 104 cfu/ml or g12,13,14. Therefore, we used direct qPCR, which does not depend on crude DNA extractions. Initially, when C. muytjensii cells were directly added to the direct qPCR master mix (see the Methods section), we incorrectly presumed that the DNA elution from these microorganisms into the external direct qPCR master mix might be induced during PCR thermal cycling. Briefly, we thought that repeated increases in the temperature would cause physical injury to the C. muytjensii; thus, thermal cycling would correspond to the aforementioned crude DNA extraction methods. As described in the Methods section, the direct qPCR master mix used in the present study comprises a 2-fold higher concentration of DNA polymerase and an approximately 2.4-fold higher concentration of Mg2+ and primers than the commercial MightyAmp direct qPCR master mix (Takara-Bio). Furthermore, our new mix has a unique combination of the PCR additives, including BSA, lysozyme, non-ionic detergent of polyoxyethylene (10) cetyl ether (Brij56), and trisodium citrate dehydrate (TSC) (for details, see Supplementary Table 1). However, we had initially added a higher concentration of the aforementioned components to accelerate PCR elongation at the highest possible reactivity under many the PCR inhibitors present in milk and blood samples15.
If DNA from the Cronobacter cells were indeed eluted into the external direct qPCR master mix during PCR thermal cycling, the chromosomal DNA would be mainly distributed in the supernatant but not in the bacterial pellets obtained through centrifugation after direct qPCR. However, the comparison of Ct values in rows 7 and 8 of Table 1 revealed that the Ct of the Pellet was 8.2 units lower than the Ct of the Supernatant; thus, the DNA could be distributed in the pellets at a ratio of more than 100-fold higher than that in the supernatant, considering the actual PCR efficiency experimentally obtained from Table 2. Therefore, we discarded the previous hypothesis and proposed that direct qPCR without crude DNA extraction might use the same reaction mechanism as that of in situ PCR27 because the DNA elution from bacterial cells into the direct qPCR master mix did not occur (rows 7 and 8 in Table 1). In situ PCR is a biotechnological approach that facilitates PCR elongation in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Target cells need exposure to a low dose of protease, brief heating period or electron irradiation because typical in situ PCR requires that the cell walls/inner membranes be compromised to allow effective penetration of all the in situ PCR master mix components, including DNA polymerase, into the targeted cells27. Furthermore, each PCR master mix component of the in situ PCR must be significantly higher in concentration than the components in a typical PCR to facilitate the penetration of all master mix components into the cells27. Particularly, the DNA polymerase concentration for in situ PCR should ideally be 10-fold higher than that in typical PCR, and the Mg2+ concentration must be increased 2-fold. As previously mentioned, the components in the direct qPCR master mix used in the present study meet the requirements for in situ PCR.
According to Figs 1 and and3,3, nearly 100% of C. muytjensii cells suspended in the direct qPCR components maintained normal morphology and retained chromosomal DNA after PCR thermal cycling. As previously estimated, direct qPCR utilized the chromosomal DNA retained in C. muytjensii cells as a PCR template. Therefore, to ascertain that the mechanism of direct qPCR is similar to that of in situ PCR, we determined that the PCR elongation proceeded in fixed C. muytjensii cells whose chromosomal DNA was bound to membrane proteins originating from the bacterial cells; and then, its genome DNA was retained in the cells in the direct qPCR system (Fig. 4). Furthermore, according to the FCM assay and fluorescence microscopy analysis, increased thermal cycling did not accelerate the disruption of C. muytjensii cells in direct qPCR (Tables 3 and and4,4, Figs 1 and and3).3). Thus, the chromosomal DNA inside C. muytjensii cells emitted green fluorescence derived from SYTO9, which intercalated with the double-stranded chromosomal DNA (Tables 3 and and4,4, Figs 1 and and33).
Additionally, the confirmation of green fluorescent bacteria in the supernatant under the four different conditions revealed the presence of C. muytjensii having chromosomal DNA in the supernatant obtained through centrifugation (Fig. 1), at a level less than 10% of that in the relevant suspended pellets (Fig. 1), suggesting that the DNA elongation of Supernatant samples shown in Table 1 could result from the aforementioned retained C. muytjensii cells but not the chromosomal DNA eluted into the Supernatant.
Therefore, we demonstrated at an initial stage of the direct qPCR that the chromosomal DNA retained in microorganisms could function as a PCR template comparable to that used in in situ PCR.
As another approach to indicate that the direct qPCR for prokaryotic cells was comparable to in situ PCR, we revealed the presence of long amplicons (primarily 2,450bp of the 16S to 23S rRNA gene) in C. muytjensii cells (lanes 4 and 5 in Fig. 5). This result confirmed that the PCR elongation was comparable to that of in situ PCR.
Next, a comparison of the Ct values of the DNA (qPCR standards) and Cell (direct qPCR) samples shown in Table 5 revealed that the chromosomal DNA of nearly 100% of the Cronobacter cells could be utilized as the PCR template in direct qPCR. The direct qPCR master mix used in the present study, which was designed for in situ PCR for prokaryotic cells, is responsible for the low detection limit of 1.6×100 cfu/ml (1.3×100 cfu/PCR) for direct qPCR (Cell in Table 5). Furthermore, a low detection limit for Cronobacter cells with direct qPCR are never obtained through qPCR using purified or crudely extracted DNA (Clean-up or Boil in Table 5). Therefore, the direct qPCR master mix developed in the present study facilitated the detection of bacterial cells of interest in typical research samples in which the levels of these cells was below the detection limit of typical PCR using various DNA purification methods or crude extraction.
Moreover, concerning the discrimination of live from dead microorganisms of interest, the potential use of ethidium monoazide (EMA) or propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with direct qPCR is feasible (Supplementary Table 1)16,28,29.
For routine use, we propose that the elucidation of the mechanism underlying this methodology (which is similar to that of in situ PCR) will lead to the development of a further improved direct qPCR master mix for prokaryotic cells that does not require manual DNA isolation or an automated machine for DNA purification. Because the detection of cells of interest using direct qPCR reaches a level of nearly 1 cell per ml of the test samples, this technology could supply numerous novel findings for genome research and food/environmental/clinical testing for prokaryotic cells. This mechanism could also significantly impact manufacturers that have previously developed a direct qPCR master mix.
C. muytjensii ATCC51329 and C. sakazakii ATCC29544 were cultured at 37°C for 16h using Brain Heart Infusion Broth (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). An aliquot of 5ml of the culture was placed in a 15-ml Falcon tube (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and subjected to refrigerated centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, and 5ml of physiological saline was subsequently added to the pellet to prepare a stock live cell suspension of Cronobacter. The live cell suspension was appropriately diluted with physiological saline as in the test sample. Independently, 1ml of the aforementioned stock of live cell suspension was placed in a 1.5-ml volume microtube (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and the tube was subsequently immersed in a boiling water bath for 50sec and immediately quenched. To generate a stock of heat-killed (dead) cell suspension, we confirmed that the bacteria did not thereafter form any colonies on a standard plate count agar medium (SPC agar: Eiken). The viable cell count of C. muytjensii or C. sakazakii live cell suspension was conducted on SPC agar medium, and measurements of turbidity were simultaneously performed at a wavelength of 600nm using a spectrophotometer U-2800A (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) to determine the relationship between the live cell count and turbidity.
The direct qPCR components comprised 0.5μl of 500μg/ml lysozyme, 6.25μl 4% Brij56, 2.5μl 2% BSA, 0.1μl 250mM TSC, 0.1μl 750mM MgCl2, 0.1μl 320×SYBR Green I, and 15.45μl of SW (total 25μl). Each C. muytjensii suspension (physiological saline or direct qPCR components) was divided into 25-μl aliquots and placed into 200-μl PCR tubes. The 25-μl portions were subjected to PCR thermal cycling involving 50 cycles at 95°C for 15sec, 60°C for 20sec, and 72°C for 30sec and were subsequently recombined into one tube (total 0.25ml). A total of 0.25ml of heat-treated C. muytjensii suspension was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 5min at 4°C, and the supernatant was transferred to a new microtube.
Freshly prepared saline or direct qPCR components (0.25ml) were added to the obtained pellets, and an aliquot of 2.5μl of the re-suspension (0.25ml) was added to 12.25μl of fresh direct qPCR components (the volume of SW was changed from the aforementioned 15.45 to 2.7μl; hereafter unless otherwise mentioned, the volume of SW was 15.45μl), followed by the addition of 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix described below (that is, 25μl of the direct qPCR master mix), corresponding to “Pellet (suspension)” in Table 1. The specific primers for C. muytjensii, ompA_F (the forward primer for ompA gene elongation; 5′-GGATTTAACCGTGAACTTTTCC-3′) and ompA_R (the reverse primer for ompA gene elongation; 5′-CGCCAGCGATGTTAGAAGA-3′) were used, resulting in the amplification of a 469 bp product30. The typical PCR master mix comprised 2μl of 10pmol/μl ompA_F, 2μl of 10pmol/μl ompA_R, 0.25μl of 5U/μl Ex-Taq (Takara-Bio, Ohtsu, Japan), 2.5μl of 10×Ex-Taq Buffer (Takara-Bio), 2μl of 2mM dNTP mixture, and 4μl of 10×SYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (10,000×concentrate in DMSO, Lonza Rockland, Inc., Rockland, ME, USA).
Approximately 12.25μl of the direct qPCR components (2.7μl of SW ver.) and 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix (that is, direct qPCR master mix) were also added to an aliquot of 2.5μl of the supernatant following the centrifugation of the aforementioned C. muytjensii suspension, corresponding to “Supernatant” in Table 1. The thermal cycle program included 1 cycle at 4°C for 3min, 50 cycles at 95°C for 15sec, 60°C for 20sec, and 72°C for 30sec, followed by 1 cycle at 95°C for 3min and a successive melt analysis of the PCR amplicons. Additionally, the Ct value in qPCR represents the first PCR cycle at which the fluorescence value resulting from PCR elongation is above the threshold, and subsequently, the Ct value decreases with increasing DNA template concentration in the PCR tube.
Ten 25-μl portions of the direct qPCR components were subjected to 50 cycles of PCR thermal cycling and combined with one portion (0.25ml) to prepare the direct qPCR components (matrices) heated through thermal cycling. Concerning the pellet or supernatant obtained through centrifugation at 10,000×g for 5min at 4°C to its one portion, the former was re-suspended in 0.25ml of freshly prepared direct qPCR components, and then the latter was used as it is for sample matrices (corresponding to Pellet or Supernatant of Heat following PCR thermal cycling in Table 2). Likewise, the same experimental procedure was performed to prepare sample matrices regarding ten 25-μl portions of the direct qPCR components without PCR thermal cycling (corresponding to Pellet or Supernatant of No heat in Table 2).
Subsequently, the C. muytjensii cells were cultured overnight, washed, and suspended in physiological saline or the direct qPCR components (corresponding to 2 kinds of Pellet or Supernatant matrices in Table 2) with or without PCR thermal cycling, at a concentration of 2.5×106 to 109 cfu/ml. To an aliquot of 2.5μl of each bacterial suspension, 12.25μl of direct qPCR components (2.7μl of SW ver.) and 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix (including C. muytjensii ompA forward and reverse primers) were added to perform the PCR.
C. muytjensii cells were cultured overnight and washed, and the bacterial pellet was suspended in physiological saline or direct qPCR components (0.25ml) at a concentration of 109 cfu/ml. Each suspension was divided into 25μl aliquots and placed into a 200-μl PCR tube followed by PCR thermal cycling (50 cycles at 95°C for 15sec, 60°C for 20sec, and 72°C for 30sec). The contents were combined (total 0.25ml). Each combined 0.25-ml bacterial suspension was halved; one half was retained in the original state, and the other half was subjected to centrifugation at 10,000×g for 5min at 4°C, and the supernatant was recovered. To 0.125ml of each of the aforementioned bacterial suspensions and supernatants, SYTO9 (Molecular Probes) was added at a ratio of 1.5μl/ml and incubated at 4°C for 15min under a safelight. Subsequently, an aliquot of 2.5μl was placed onto a glass slide, covered with a cover slip, and examined on an AxiosKop2 motplus fluorescence/stereoscopic microscope (LEJ Leistungselektronik Jena GmbH, Jena, Deutschland) to determine whether the bacterial cell emitted λmax530nm green fluorescence with an argon laser and a 488nm excitation.
Similarly, the C. muytjensii suspension (109 cfu/ml; finally 0.25ml) in 25-μl aliquots with physiological saline or direct qPCR components, was subjected to PCR thermal cycling, including 50 cycles or no PCR cycles, and the divided portions were pooled, generating a total of 0.25ml. Each suspension (0.25ml) was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 5min at 4°C followed by the removal of the supernatant; the resulting bacterial pellet was suspended with 0.25ml of physiological saline. Similarly, SYTO9 staining was performed for the measurement of FCM; the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and an argon laser of 488nm were used to determine the bacterial cell plots through FSC (forward scattering light) and SSC (side scattering light). When the SYTO9 staining agent intercalated into the intracellular chromosomal DNA, the FL1 filter (of which λmax is 530nm by excitation with argon laser irradiation) detected the green fluorescence of the SYTO9, and the FL1 signal was plotted. Although no nuclear staining agents based on propidium iodide (PI) were used, the red fluorescence was collected using the FL3 filter as a reference. The detailed measurement conditions of FCM are presented below:
p1 of Parameter: FSC of Detection, E02 of Voltage, log of Mode; p2 of Parameter: SSC of Detection, 458 of Voltage, log of Mode; p3 of Parameter: FL1 of Detection, 820 of Voltage, log of Mode; p4 of Parameter: FL2 of Detection, 643 of Voltage, log of Mode; p5 of Parameter: FL3 of Detection, 643 of Voltage, log of Mode; p6 of Parameter: FL1-A of Detection, 1.00 of Amp-Gain, lin of Mode; p7 of Parameter: FL1-H of Detection, 1.00 of Amp-Gain; lin of Mode. Compensation was below: FL1 – 47.2 FL2; FL2 – 37.7 FL 1; FL2 – 44.7 FL3; FL 3–36.5 FL2. Threshold: Primary parameter of FSC-H 0. Total events in FSC-SSC plots: 5×104. Hereafter, all the FCM measurements followed the conditions described in this section.
Two 500-μl portions of the C. muytjensii cells (9.3×108 cfu/ml) were cultured overnight and centrifuged at 3,000×g for 10min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, and 500μl of fixation A (4% paraformaldehyde, PFA) or fixation B (methanol/acetic acid=3/1) was subsequently added to the pellet. The mixture was incubated overnight at 4°C to cross-link the chromosomal DNA in the C. muytjensii cells and cell wall proteins to fix the DNA in the bacterial cells. Next, the cells were washed 3 times with 500μl of physiological saline and were subsequently suspended in 250μl of physiological saline. The recovery rate of bacterial cells to pellet after each centrifugation for washing was experimentally determined to be 80% (legend of Table 5), and centrifugation was conducted four times. Thus, the concentration of the C. muytjensii suspension was estimated to be 7.6×108 cfu/ml. To an aliquot of 2.5μl of this suspension, 12.25μl of the direct qPCR components (2.7μl of SW ver.) and 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix (C. muytjensii ompA specific primers) were added, and the direct qPCR was subsequently performed for 30 cycles.
Next, twenty 27.5-μl aliquots of the PCR products were combined into one portion and subjected to centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10min at 4°C. A 5-μl aliquot of this supernatant was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel, followed by 1×SYBR® Gold nucleic acid gel staining (10,000×concentrate in DMSO, Lonza Rockland, Inc., Rockland, ME, USA; hereafter, all gel staining was performed with SYBR Gold stain). After the residual supernatant was removed, 200μl of physiological saline was subsequently added (estimated C. muytjensii cell number was 1.5×108 cells/ml, considering the recovery loss due to a single centrifugation). The SYTO9 (Invitrogen) was added at a concentration of 1.5μl/ml, followed by FCM measurements.
Following the aforementioned fixation procedure, 500μl of C. muytjensii cells (4.3×108 cfu/ml) were cultured overnight and subjected to centrifugation, followed by removal of the supernatant, and 500μl of fixation B (methanol/acetic acid=3/1) was added to the pellet, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C. As a control, a sample in which the fixation was not performed was obtained using the same volume of physiological saline instead of fixation agent. Next, the cells were washed 3 times with 500μl of saline and suspended in 250μl of saline. Because the recovery rate of bacterial cells to pellet after each centrifugation for washing was 80% (legend of Table 5) and centrifugation was conducted four times, the concentration of the C. muytjensii cells was estimated to be 3.5×108 cells/ml.
To an aliquot of 2.5μl of this suspension, 12.25μl of the direct qPCR components (2.7μl SW ver.) and 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix (total coliform-specific primers of 16S_2751F and 23S_5201R instead of C. muytjensii ompA primers) mentioned below were added to perform direct qPCR for retaining a fraction of the long PCR amplicons in C. muytjensii cells20. The forward primer 16S_2751F (5′-CTACAATGGCGCATACAAAGAGAAGCGACCT-3′) and reverse primer 23S_5201R (5′-CTTCTCCCGAAGTTACGGCACCA-3′) were used, and the principal elongated amplicon length was set at 2,451bp20. The thermal cycle profile included 1 cycle at 4°C for 3min; 50 cycles at 95°C for 15sec, 60°C for 20sec, and 72°C for 3min, followed by 1 cycle at 95°C for 3min. Before or after the direct qPCR elongation, the 20 portions of the pre- or post-PCR products for C. muytjensii cells treated with a preliminary fixation B or no fixation were combined and subjected to centrifugation. The pellet was washed three times with 500μl of saline to completely remove the long DNA amplicons potentially adsorbed onto the cell walls of C. muytjensii, and DNA purification was performed using the QuickGene SP kit DNA tissue to determine the presence of long DNA amplicons in the cells (Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
From the C. sakazakii ATCC29544 and C. muytjensii ATCC51329 cultured overnight, for Cronobacter DNA standards, purified DNA free from RNA contamination was obtained following the typical SDS/protease treatment and phenol/chloroform extraction, followed by precipitation with ethanol together with RNase treatment to confirm the ratio of the optical density OD260nm/OD280nm in a range of 1.8 to 2.016,31. In contrast, after the aforementioned overnight cultures were washed with physiological saline, and the cells were serially diluted with SW. A 1-ml Cronobacter cell suspension was centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed. To each bacterial pellet, 12.25μl of the direct qPCR components (2.7μl SW ver.) and 12.75μl of the typical PCR master mix (ompA), i.e., the direct qPCR master mix, were added for direct qPCR.
To examine the detection limits for Cronobacter cells by qPCR with purified DNA, DNA purification using the FastPure DNA Kit (Takara Bio) was performed for 1ml bacterial suspension, and subsequently, an aliquot of 2.5μl of purified DNA solution (200μl) was included for qPCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Crude extraction through boiling 1ml bacterial suspension for 10min was performed, and subsequently, an aliquot of 2.5μl of the supernatant obtained after centrifugation of the boiled suspension (1ml) was included for qPCR.
As a control (qPCR standards using diluted purified DNA), 2.5μl of the isolated DNA solutions was added to a new PCR tube at 6.5fg to 650pg/PCR tube, followed by the addition of the direct qPCR master mix. Because 1 cell of the bacteria was estimated to contain 5fg of chromosomal DNA, each amount of DNA included in the PCR was identical to that of the associated bacterial cell number obtained from the centrifugation of each 1ml bacterial suspension.
How to cite this article: Soejima, T. et al. A novel mechanism for direct real-time polymerase chain reaction that does not require DNA isolation from prokaryotic cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 28000; doi: 10.1038/srep28000 (2016).
Author Contributions T.S. designed the experiments, performed the analysis, and wrote the paper. J.-Z.X. edited the paper. F.A. supervised the study. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.