PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of medicineHomeSearchSubmit a ManuscriptMedicine
 
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 November; 94(44): e1932.
Published online 2015 November 6. doi:  10.1097/MD.0000000000001932
PMCID: PMC4915899

Renal Denervation

A Potential Novel Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?
Tao Pan, PhD, Jin-he Guo, MD, and Gao-jun Teng, MD
Monitoring Editor: Sanket Patel.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a group of metabolic diseases of multiple etiologies. Although great progress has been made, researchers are still working on the pathogenesis of T2DM and how to best use the treatments available. Aside from several novel pharmacological approaches, catheter-based sympathetic renal denervation (RDN) has gained a significant role in resistant hypertension, as well as improvements in glycemic control in T2DM.

In this article, we will summarize herein the role sympathetic activation plays in the progression of T2DM and review the recent clinical RDN experience in glucose metabolism.

We performed systematic review in online databases, including PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science, from inception until 2015.

Studies were included if a statistical relationship was investigated between RDN and T2DM.

The quality of each included study was assessed by Newcastle–Ottawa scale score. To synthesize these studies, a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model was applied as appropriate. Then, we calculated heterogeneity, performed sensitivity analysis, tested publication bias, and did meta-regression analysis. Finally, we identified 4 eligible articles.

In most studies, RDN achieved via novel catheter-based approach using radiofrequency energy has gained a significant role in resistant hypertension, as well as improvements in glycemic control in T2DM. But the DREAMS-Study showed that RDN did not change median insulin sensitivity nor systemic sympathetic activity.

Firstly, the current published studies lacked a proper control group, along with the sample capacity was small. Also, data obtained in the subgroups of diabetic patients were not separately analyzed and the follow-up period was very short. In addition, a reduction in blood pressure accounts for the improvements in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance cannot be excluded.

If the favorable result of better glucose metabolism is confirmed in large-scale, randomized studies, RDN may emerge as a novel therapeutic option for patients with T2DM.

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of metabolic diseases that resulted from alterations in insulin secretion or insulin action, which is characterized by impairment in glucose, protein, and lipid metabolism.1 Among the 4 types of DM, type 2 DM (T2DM) is the most prevalent and makes up 90% to 95% of all the diabetic patients,2,3 whose pathophysiology includes insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and a variable degree of insulin secretory deficiency.4 Patients with T2DM are at a high risk of macrovascular events, doubling the risk of developing acute myocardial infarction and stroke,5 indicating a higher mortality rate in patients affected by heart failure alongside T2DM than nondiabetic ones6 and leading to about 8 years shorter of life expectance than the general population.7 Importantly, unless urgent measures are taken, 1 in 19 adults will be affected by DM by 2030.8

Over 3 decades ago, Asmal and Marble9 stated that “despite the availability of oral hypoglycaemic drugs for nearly 30 years, their precise mode of action and role in the management of diabetes mellitus remains poorly defined and controversial.” Until now, although great progress has been made, researchers are still working on the pathogenesis of T2DM and how to best use the treatments available.10 The past few years have witnessed the international interests of clinicians and researchers on the approach of renal denervation (RDN) by catheter using radiofrequency energy as a novel treatment for resistant hypertension.11 In some RDN researches, aside from better blood pressure control, a fall of fasting glucose and an increase in insulin sensitivity had been observed.1214 This improvement in glycemic control likely resulted from attenuation in sympathetic nervous system activity and is accompanied with a reduction in insulin resistance. However, very recent findings of the DREAMS-Study15 showed that fasting glucose and median insulin sensitivity did not change after RDN and no effect in systemic sympathetic activity was observed. Therefore, further evaluation in rigorously designed clinical trials will be necessary before any definite conclusion can be drawn.

In this article, we will summarize herein the role sympathetic activation plays in the progression of T2DM and review the recent clinical RDN experience in glucose metabolism.

Sympathetic Nervous System and T2DM

Awareness of the role of the sympathetic nervous system in T2DM has captured scientific attention with the possibility of catheter-based RDN as a novel therapeutic option.

Elevated Sympathetic Nerve Activity in T2DM

A great many clinical and epidemiological investigations have observed elevated sympathetic nerve activity in T2DM.1620 Huggett et al18 examined muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), which has been shown to correlate well with sensory, somatomotor, and autonomic effector responses of sympathetic activity,21 in 4 groups of subjects, patients with T2DM alone, essential hypertension alone, essential hypertension accompanied with T2DM, and healthy controls. They found highest MSNA in hypertensive-T2DM patients, as well as higher MSNA in essential hypertension alone and T2DM alone patients comparing with matched subjects. Fasting insulin levels were greater in hypertensive-T2DM and T2DM alone patients than in hypertensive patients and healthy controls. Their observations provided the proof that T2DM patients had a marked increase in sympathetic nervous system activity, even in the presence of normal blood pressure. In support of this contention, their subsequent study19 demonstrated that patients with T2DM had both greater resting MSNA and single-unit MSNA, although with similar reflex responses, baroreflex sensitivity, and sympathovagal balance controlling the heart period. Furthermore, very recent findings showed that T2DM patients had higher resting MSNA burst incidence, increased arterial norepinephrine levels, lower plasma norepinephrine clearance, and reduced neuronal reuptake compared with controls; besides, norepinephrine spillover responses to glucose ingestion were blunted in subjects with T2DM.20 Moreover, in another investigation conducted by Huggett et al,22 elevated sympathetic nerve activity also occurred in normal nondiabetic offspring of patients with T2DM in proportion to their plasma insulin levels and resistance, indicating the presence of a mechanistic link between sympathetic activation and hyperinsulinemia. More recently, Santulli et al23,24 stated that systemically circulating or locally released sympathetic catecholamines may activate α1 and β2 adrenergic receptors, which provides fine-tuning to the endocrine pancreas activity and insulin secretion. These observations suggest that the overactivity of sympathetic nervous system may be strongly associated with T2DM.

The Potential Mechanisms Linking Sympathetic Activation to T2DM

The task now becomes to demonstrate how the sympathetic nervous system may result in T2DM. Since 1664, Thomas Willis first described the sympathetic nervous system in detail25; researches had been carried on the role of it. Besides in cardiovascular regulation, the activation of sympathetic nervous system also has profound metabolic effects leading to increased levels of fatty acids in plasma, increased hepatic gluconeogenesis, and alterations in pancreatic insulin release.26,27 Sympathetic activation could contribute to the development of insulin resistance,28 which cells fail to respond to insulin and is generally considered as a key feature in the pathogenesis of T2DM.29 In a study of isolated perfused forearm models in 14 healthy volunteers, an increase was found in sympathetic nervous system activation, which can cause acute insulin resistance in the forearm.30 Moreover, the subsequent study in a cohort of 433 young, nonobese, normotensive men31 showed that baseline plasma noradrenaline levels, which can provide information on sympathetic activity,32 independently predicted a rise in hyperinsulinemia, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure in 5 years. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that in response to a cold pressor test, which predominantly activates alpha adrenergic responses, noradrenaline independently predicted insulin resistance at 18-year follow-up.33 These findings were supported by observations that acute activation of endogenous noradrenaline release antagonized insulin-mediated glucose uptake in forearm skeletal muscle.34 According to Jamerson et al,30 a decrease in blood flow after the raise of noradrenaline concentration could impair the ability of cells to transport glucose through their membranes, which is probably the result of alpha-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstriction caused by sympathetic overactivity. This physiological activity could reduce the number of open capillaries and increase the distance, which insulin has to travel from the intravascular compartment to reach the cell membrane.35 Collectively, these studies suggest that pathological activation of sympathetic nervous system plays a significant role in the process of insulin resistance, making patients more prone to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM.18,35

On the contrary, almost 30 years ago, Landsberg36 proposed a link between insulin resistance and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Thereafter, insulin resistance could lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system activation has been confirmed.37 Subsequent studies in healthy volunteers supported that infusions of insulin increased MSNA, which appeared to be independent of the vasodilatory effects of insulin.38 Then, it comes to a “chicken and egg” scenario; in other words, which abnormality comes first and originates the vicious circle that maintains both sympathetic overactivity and insulin resistance.35 Masuo et al28 found that in the development of hypertension, Japanese individuals showed an increase in both plasma noradrenaline and insulin levels, while 10 years earlier they only showed an increase in plasma noradrenaline. This suggested that sympathetic activation possibly causes insulin resistance in some conditions. It is vital to know whether this is also the case for T2DM to implement the most effective therapeutic measures.

Above all, there is the abundant evidence for an important role of activation of the sympathetic nervous system in insulin resistance, which is considered essential in the pathogenesis of T2DM.

Sympathoinhibition may Improve Glycemic Control

An experiment of cats, which underwent total removal of the sympathetic nervous chain from the stellate to the pelvic ganglia, showed that normal cats experienced an average increase in blood glucose of 34.1% compared with an average decrease of 0.02% in the sympathectomized cats.39 Given its unfavorable major side effects profile and the high mortality rate, this approach had not been used in clinical. Lately, studies showed that sympathoinhibition would be expected to improve glycemic control.40 Therefore, it appears possible to propose a novel procedure that abolishes efferent and afferent renal nerve activity may be helpful to improve plasma glucose concentrations.

Clinical Studies on RDN

Recently, a novel catheter-based approach selectively targeting the renal sympathetic nerves using radiofrequency ablation technology has been developed. It was first assessed in Symplicity HTN-1 trial,41 and a sustained decrease of blood pressure at 3-year follow-up was observed.42 MSNA were also decreased after RDN,43 indicating a reduction in overall sympathetic tone. The following multicenter, randomized Symplicity HTN-2 trial showed that RDN was more effective at blood pressure reduction than medical therapy alone.44,45 However, the findings of the Symplicity HTN-3 trial,46 a prospective, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial, contradicted those of the Symplicity HTN-1 and HTN-2 trials. In that trial, the reduction of blood pressure after RDN was not significant as compared with a sham procedure.46 Therefore, more clinical trials are needed before any definite conclusion can be drawn.

Besides resistant hypertension, RDN may also benefit other diseases characterized by overactivity of sympathetic nervous system. The EnligHTN I trial47 showed that RDN significantly reduced average heart rate; besides, patients with heart failure may benefit from this treatment.48 Moreover, a reduction in left ventricular mass and an improvement of diastolic parameters were reported after RDN49; atrial and ventricular arrhythmias have shown to be improved as well.50 In addition, RDN improved renal resistance indices and decreased the severity of macroalbuminuria and microalbuminuria even in the absence of an improvement in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).51 Interestingly, RDN improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients with T2DM,1214 suggesting that this approach might help with glycemic control in addition to hypertension control.

Effects of RDN on Glucose Metabolism

In 1998, Huang et al52 performed experiments in male Sprague-Dawley rats, making hyperinsulinemic by insulin infusion via osmotic minipumps implanted subcutaneously, to evaluate the role of the renal nerves. They used surgically stripping all visible renal nerves along renal arteries and veins to obtain bilateral RDN, which depleted renal norepinephrine stores and prevented the development of hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension. After hypertension model had been fully established, bilateral RDN reversed the elevated systolic blood pressure to normal within 2 weeks,52 suggesting that RDN could not only prevent hypertension but also reverse the pressor effects of insulin. In addition, the possible confounding role of insulin-induced glucose alterations was shut out by using the euglycemic clamp approach to keep constant blood glucose levels.53

On the basis of this background, some clinicians have experimented catheter-based RDN on glycemic control, and these studies (Table (Table1)1) were based on the theory that sympathetic overactivity can induce insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia.28 Mahfoud et al12 investigated the effect of RDN on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in patients with resistant hypertension. In their study, 50 patients with resistant hypertension were divided into RDN group (N = 37) and conventional treatment group (N = 13), of whom 20 (40%) were T2DM under metformin, glicazide, or combined therapy, while none was under insulin treatment. Three months after treatment, besides mean blood pressure reduction by 32 and 12 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic, respectively, a significant improvement in glucose metabolism was found in the RDN group. Specifically, fasting glucose was reduced from 118 ± 3.4 to 108 ± 3.8 mg/dL (P = 0.039), insulin levels from 20.8 ± 3.0 to 9.3 ± 2.5 μIU/mL (P = 0.006), C-peptide levels decreased from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 3.0 ± 0.9 ng/mL (P = 0.002), and homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) improved from 6.0 ± 0.9 to 2.4 ± 0.8 (P = 0.001) significantly. In addition, mean 2-hour glucose levels significantly reduced by 27 mg/dL (P = 0.012) following oral glucose tolerance test, although there were no changes in blood pressure or metabolic markers in the control group. Meanwhile, BMI and antihypertensive treatment remained unchanged during this period.12 However, the glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels remained nearly at baseline values and did not change significantly during 3-month follow-up. As the level of HbA1c correlates with the risk of long-term diabetes complications,54 it still needs to be determined that whether this may be due to short-term life span of red blood cells or other factors. This was the first study showing that RDN could reduce insulin resistance and improve glycemic control, which might by reducing sympathetic drive. The possibility observed in this research may open a promising nonpharmacological strategy for T2DM patients.

TABLE 1
Studies of Catheter-Based RDN on Glycemic Control

The favorable effect of RDN on glucose metabolism is supported by investigations of 2 female patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS),14 a disease characterized by insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes, and blood pressure elevation related to sympathetic nervous activation.55 After both patients took RDN, fasting plasma glucose declined and insulin sensitivity improved by 17.5% in the presence of unaltered bodyweight at 3-month follow-up. Moreover, the improvements in glucose metabolism, reduction in sympathetic activity measured by MSNA, and whole-body norepinephrine spillover was observed.14 In addition, glomerular hyperfiltration and urinary albumin excretion were also reduced, indicating that RDN might serve as a therapeutic intervention to attenuate the progression of renal injury in diabetic nephropathy, which had been proved in an animal model.56 In that study, renal norepinephrine content was significantly raised following diabetic induction in streptozotocin-induced DM in (mRen-2)27 rats and ablated after denervation. Immunohistochemistry and protein densitometric analysis of diabetic-innervated kidneys revealed that RDN significantly reduced protein expression of fibrotic markers, attenuated albuminuria, and prevented the loss of glomerular podocin expression,56 indicating the potential of RDN to slow the progression of diabetes-induced nephropathy. Nonetheless, the available data are only from experimental models; whether RDN has similar effects in T2DM patients and could help to prevent the development of diabetes remains to be explored.

Another potential beneficial effect of RDN on glucose metabolism came from study carried out in 10 obese patients with resistant hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS),13 which is characterized by an increased sympathetic activity.57 Six months after RDN, aside from significant reduction in blood pressure (-34/-13 mm Hg; P < 0.01) and apnea–hypopnea index (16.3 vs 4.5 events per hour; P = 0.059), plasma glucose concentration 2-hour after oral glucose tolerance test significantly reduced from 7.0 to 6.4 mmol/L (P = 0.05), and HbA1c decreased from 6.1% to 5.6% (P < 0.05).13 However, alterations in fasting plasma glucose have not been found, possibly because of small number of diabetic patients in this study. The mechanisms by which RDN affects insulin metabolism remain unknown. The possibilities may be complex, such as a decrease in central sympathetic outflow indicating an alteration in afferent sympathetic drive, an inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system, a decrease in vascular alpha adrenergic tone, resulting in skeletal muscle vasodilation, an increased sensitivity to the nonesterified fatty acid lowering effects of insulin, and an improved glucose transport to skeletal muscle.53,58,59

Nevertheless, the DREAMS-Study,15 investigating the effects of RDN on insulin sensitivity and blood pressure in patients with metabolic syndrome, contradicted the result of better glucose metabolism of those researches mentioned above.1214 In that study, 29 patients fulfilling the criteria for metabolic syndrome were enrolled, of whom 5 (17%) were T2DM. MSNA and heart rate variability (HRV) measurements were performed to assess sympathetic activity. Fasting glucose changed from 7.2 ± 1.7 to 7.4 ± 2.6 mmol/L at 6-month follow-up (P = 0.34) and 7.0 ± 1.3 mmol/L at 12-month follow-up (P = 0.34). Median insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the Simple Index assessing Insulin Sensitivity oral glucose tolerance test (SIiSOGTT), did not change at half- and 1-year follow-up (P = 0.60 and P = 0.77, respectively). Although decreased numerically by −0.55 ± 3.7 (P = 0.43) 1 year after RDN, HOMA-IR did not reach any statistical significance at 6- and 12-month follow-up. One year after treatment, mean ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure was reduced by 6 ± 12/5 ± 7 mmHg when compared with baseline (P = 0.02/<0.01). However, self-monitored blood pressure measurements data showed no decreases. MSNA did not change after RDN: 48 (31) bursts/min and 75 (23) bursts/100 heartbeats at 6-month follow-up when compared with 48 (41) bursts/min (P = 0.86) and 74 (48) bursts/100 heartbeats (P = 0.80) at baseline. In addition, no significant differences in HRV measures were observed 12 months after RDN. Their results showed that RDN did not change fasting glucose, median insulin sensitivity nor systemic sympathetic activity.15 The difference between this study and the previously published studies may be explained by patient selection, as the DREAMS-Study included nearly drug-naive patients whose MSNA was higher than other studies.60,61 As preclinical studies have proven that surgical denervation could lower sympathetic activity,62 another explanation may be that the currently used catheter did not adequately lower sympathetic nervous system activity. It is vital to realize that this study lacked a control group and T2DM sample capacity was small and made it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Therefore, further evaluation in rigorously designed clinical trials will be necessary to confirm previously reported benefits of RDN in patients with T2DM.

Future Perspectives

In spite of the preliminary results observed by RDN in diabetic patients, several limitations have to be mentioned. Firstly, the current published studies lacked a proper control group, along with the sample capacity was small. Also, data obtained in the subgroups of diabetic patients were not separately analyzed and the follow-up period was very short. In addition, a reduction in blood pressure accounts for the improvements in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance cannot be excluded.

These limitations require future studies in the metabolic area to confirm the previous results. Appropriately designed future researches are needed to enhance the understanding of the potential diabetic consequences of RDN, as well as to document the durability of the results. Currently, ongoing clinical trials, including Renal Denervation in Diabetes (NCT 02081989, conducted to investigate the effects of RDN on diabetes), Metabolic Syndrome Study (Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Metabolic Syndrome, NCT 01911078, performed to determine the effects of RDN on insulin resistance and MSNA in patients with metabolic syndrome), and others, which are evaluating the effects of sympathetic RDN on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, will further define the applicability of RDN in T2DM.

Besides reduction of blood pressure and improvements in glycemic control, reducing sympathetic activity by RDN might also have beneficial effects of reducing heart rate,63 improving atrial and ventricular arrhythmias50 and other currently unknown multiple effects. As long as the pathophysiological understanding of RDN therapy is confirmed by proper designed clinical trials, this technique could be used to treat a variety of diseases.

CONCLUSION

In most studies, RDN achieved via novel catheter-based approach using radiofrequency energy has gained a significant role in resistant hypertension, as well as improvements in glycemic control in T2DM. This conforms the concept that activation of renal sympathetic nerves importantly contributes to insulin resistance and impairment of glucose metabolism. But the DREAMS-Study showed that RDN did not change median insulin sensitivity nor systemic sympathetic activity. Thus, more clinical trials are needed before any definite conclusion can be drawn. Unless the favorable result of better glucose metabolism is confirmed in large-scale, randomized studies, RDN may emerge as a novel therapeutic option for patients with T2DM.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, DM = diabetes mellitus, GFR = glomerular filtration rate, HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance, HRV = heart rate variability, MSNA = muscle sympathetic nerve activity, OSAS = obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome, RDN = renal denervation, SIiSOGTT = Simple Index assessing Insulin Sensitivity oral glucose tolerance test, T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Tao Pan helped to draft the manuscript. Jin-he Guo was involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. Gao-jun Teng participated in the design of the study and was involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical drug(s).

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81471762).

Neither the entire paper nor any of its contents is currently being submitted or has been accepted by any other journal.

REFERENCES

1. Castro TY, Katholi RE. Novel treatment approaches in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. World J Diabetes 2014; 5:536–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Maraschin JF, Murussi N, Witter V, et al. Diabetes mellitus classification. Arq Bras Cardiol 2010; 95:e40–e46. [PubMed]
3. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36 Suppl 1:S67–S74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Goff DJ, Gerstein HC, Ginsberg HN, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: current knowledge and rationale for the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99 (12A):4i–20i. [PubMed]
5. Buse JB, Ginsberg HN, Bakris GL, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation 2007; 115:114–126. [PubMed]
6. Sardu C, Marfella R, Santulli G. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly people. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2014; 7:362–368. [PubMed]
7. Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF, et al. Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ 2001; 322:1389–1393. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 94:311–321. [PubMed]
9. Asmal AC, Marble A. Oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update. Drugs 1984; 28:62–78. [PubMed]
10. Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del PS. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet 2014; 383:1068–1083. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Schmieder RE, Redon J, Grassi G, et al. ESH position paper: renal denervation: an interventional therapy of resistant hypertension. J Hypertens 2012; 30:837–841. [PubMed]
12. Mahfoud F, Schlaich M, Kindermann I, et al. Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: a pilot study. Circulation 2011; 123:1940–1946. [PubMed]
13. Witkowski A, Prejbisz A, Florczak E, et al. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnea course, and glycemic control in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea. Hypertension 2011; 58:559–565. [PubMed]
14. Schlaich MP, Straznicky N, Grima M, et al. Renal denervation: a potential new treatment modality for polycystic ovary syndrome? J Hypertens 2011; 29:991–996. [PubMed]
15. Verloop WL, Spiering W, Vink EE, et al. Denervation of the renal arteries in metabolic syndrome: the DREAMS-Study. Hypertension 2015; 65:751–757. [PubMed]
16. Schaan BD, Irigoyen MC, Lacchini S, et al. Sympathetic modulation of the renal glucose transporter GLUT2 in diabetic rats. Auton Neurosci 2005; 117:54–61. [PubMed]
17. Bikhazi AB, Azar ST, Birbari AE, et al. Characterization of insulin-resistance: role of receptor alteration in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000; 11:299–306. [PubMed]
18. Huggett RJ, Scott EM, Gilbey SG, et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on sympathetic neural mechanisms in hypertension. Circulation 2003; 108:3097–3101. [PubMed]
19. Huggett RJ, Scott EM, Gilbey SG, et al. Disparity of autonomic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2005; 48:172–179. [PubMed]
20. Straznicky NE, Grima MT, Sari CI, et al. Neuroadrenergic dysfunction along the diabetes continuum: a comparative study in obese metabolic syndrome subjects. Diabetes 2012; 61:2506–2516. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Vallbo AB, Hagbarth KE, Torebjork HE, et al. Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev 1979; 59:919–957. [PubMed]
22. Huggett RJ, Hogarth AJ, Mackintosh AF, et al. Sympathetic nerve hyperactivity in non-diabetic offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2006; 49:2741–2744. [PubMed]
23. Santulli G, Trimarco B, Iaccarino G. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and hypertension: molecular insights and pathophysiological mechanisms. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2013; 20:5–12. [PubMed]
24. Santulli G, Lombardi A, Sorriento D, et al. Age-related impairment in insulin release: the essential role of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Diabetes 2012; 61:692–701. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Esler M. Sympathetic nervous system moves toward center stage in cardiovascular medicine: from Thomas Willis to resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2014; 63:e25–e32. [PubMed]
26. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, et al. Decreased effect of insulin to stimulate skeletal muscle blood flow in obese man. A novel mechanism for insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 1990; 85:1844–1852. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Grassi G, Dell’Oro R, Facchini A, et al. Effect of central and peripheral body fat distribution on sympathetic and baroreflex function in obese normotensives. J Hypertens 2004; 22:2363–2369. [PubMed]
28. Masuo K, Mikami H, Ogihara T, et al. Sympathetic nerve hyperactivity precedes hyperinsulinemia and blood pressure elevation in a young, nonobese Japanese population. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10:77–83. [PubMed]
29. Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B, Kahn CR. Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:85–96. [PubMed]
30. Jamerson KA, Julius S, Gudbrandsson T, et al. Reflex sympathetic activation induces acute insulin resistance in the human forearm. Hypertension 1993; 21:618–623. [PubMed]
31. Masuo K, Kawaguchi H, Mikami H, et al. Serum uric acid and plasma norepinephrine concentrations predict subsequent weight gain and blood pressure elevation. Hypertension 2003; 42:474–480. [PubMed]
32. Lansdown A, Rees DA. The sympathetic nervous system in polycystic ovary syndrome: a novel therapeutic target? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012; 77:791–801. [PubMed]
33. Flaa A, Aksnes TA, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Increased sympathetic reactivity may predict insulin resistance: an 18-year follow-up study. Metabolism 2008; 57:1422–1427. [PubMed]
34. Lembo G, Capaldo B, Rendina V, et al. Acute noradrenergic activation induces insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 1994; 266 (2 Pt 1):E242–E247. [PubMed]
35. Mancia G, Bousquet P, Elghozi JL, et al. The sympathetic nervous system and the metabolic syndrome. J Hypertens 2007; 25:909–920. [PubMed]
36. Landsberg L. Diet, obesity and hypertension: an hypothesis involving insulin, the sympathetic nervous system, and adaptive thermogenesis. Q J Med 1986; 61:1081–1090. [PubMed]
37. Landsberg L. Insulin-mediated sympathetic stimulation: role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related hypertension (or, how insulin affects blood pressure, and why). J Hypertens 2001; 19 (3 Pt 2):523–528. [PubMed]
38. Hausberg M, Mark AL, Hoffman RP, et al. Dissociation of sympathoexcitatory and vasodilator actions of modestly elevated plasma insulin levels. J Hypertens 1995; 13:1015–1021. [PubMed]
39. Cannon WB, Newton HF, Bright EM, et al. Some aspects of the physiology of animals surviving complete exclusion of sympathetic nerve impulses. Am J Physiol 1929; 89:84–107.
40. Straznicky NE, Grima MT, Eikelis N, et al. The effects of weight loss versus weight loss maintenance on sympathetic nervous system activity and metabolic syndrome components. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:E503–E508. [PubMed]
41. Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet 2009; 373:1275–1281. [PubMed]
42. Krum H, Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, et al. Percutaneous renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: final 3-year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study. Lancet 2014; 383:622–629. [PubMed]
43. Schlaich MP, Sobotka PA, Krum H, et al. Renal sympathetic-nerve ablation for uncontrolled hypertension. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:932–934. [PubMed]
44. Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376:1903–1909. [PubMed]
45. Esler MD, Krum H, Schlaich M, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension: one-year results from the Symplicity HTN-2 randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2012; 126:2976–2982. [PubMed]
46. Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, et al. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1393–1401. [PubMed]
47. Worthley SG, Tsioufis CP, Worthley MI, et al. Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:2132–2140. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Davies JE, Manisty CH, Petraco R, et al. First-in-man safety evaluation of renal denervation for chronic systolic heart failure: primary outcome from REACH-Pilot study. Int J Cardiol 2013; 162:189–192. [PubMed]
49. Brandt MC, Mahfoud F, Reda S, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation reduces left ventricular hypertrophy and improves cardiac function in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:901–909. [PubMed]
50. Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Corbucci G, et al. A randomized comparison of pulmonary vein isolation with versus without concomitant renal artery denervation in patients with refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation and resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:1163–1170. [PubMed]
51. Mahfoud F, Cremers B, Janker J, et al. Renal hemodynamics and renal function after catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2012; 60:419–424. [PubMed]
52. Huang WC, Fang TC, Cheng JT. Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats. Hypertension 1998; 32:249–254. [PubMed]
53. Grassi G. Renal denervation in cardiometabolic disease: concepts, achievements and perspectives. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 23:77–83. [PubMed]
54. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32:1327–1334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Dasgupta A, Khan A, Banerjee U, et al. Predictors of insulin resistance and metabolic complications in polycystic ovarian syndrome in an eastern Indian population. Indian J Clin Biochem 2013; 28:169–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Yao Y, Fomison-Nurse IC, Harrison JC, et al. Chronic bilateral renal denervation attenuates renal injury in a transgenic rat model of diabetic nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2014; 307:F251–F262. [PubMed]
57. Taranto ML, Floras JS, Millar PJ, et al. Inverse relationship of subjective daytime sleepiness to sympathetic activity in patients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2012; 142:1222–1228. [PubMed]
58. Asai K, Yang GP, Geng YJ, et al. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockade arrests myocyte damage and preserves cardiac function in the transgenic G(salpha) mouse. J Clin Invest 1999; 104:551–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Krum H, Sobotka P, Mahfoud F, et al. Device-based antihypertensive therapy: therapeutic modulation of the autonomic nervous system. Circulation 2011; 123:209–215. [PubMed]
60. Brinkmann J, Heusser K, Schmidt BM, et al. Catheter-based renal nerve ablation and centrally generated sympathetic activity in difficult-to-control hypertensive patients: prospective case series. Hypertension 2012; 60:1485–1490. [PubMed]
61. Hering D, Lambert EA, Marusic P, et al. Substantial reduction in single sympathetic nerve firing after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2013; 61:457–464. [PubMed]
62. Henegar JR, Zhang Y, De Rama R, et al. Catheter-based radiorefrequency renal denervation lowers blood pressure in obese hypertensive dogs. Am J Hypertens 2014; 27:1285–1292. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Ukena C, Mahfoud F, Spies A, et al. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on heart rate and atrioventricular conduction in patients with resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167:2846–2851. [PubMed]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health