PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of etmLink to Publisher's site
 
Exp Ther Med. 2016 July; 12(1): 28–32.
Published online 2016 April 11. doi:  10.3892/etm.2016.3253
PMCID: PMC4906629

Importance of gut microbiota in health and diseases of new born infants

Abstract

The multifarious assortment of microorganisms present in gut of humans is termed as gut microbiota. These include 1,000 species accompanied by approximately 2 million genes in an individual adult. The gut microbiota has multifactorial protective roles against allergic reactions, inflammation, cardiac pathological states and even in the state of malignant carcinogenesis existing in humans. By contrast, adverse alterations in the microbiota result in chronic pathological states, including autoimmune diseases, cancer and circulatory system obstructions. Gut bacteria also maintain sensitivity towards nutritional changes as well as antibiotics. The present review article focused on the importance of gut bacteria in newborn infants with special reference to their protective role in various pediatric pathological states linked with gut bacteria. In addition, the importance of probiotics in relation to gut microbiota are to be discussed.

Keywords: gut, bacteria, infants, preterm, microbiota

1. Introduction

The community of microorganism species residing in the digestive tracts of mammals including humans, forms gut microbiota (Fig 1). The growing advancements in molecular as well as metabolic research fields allowed us to study in depth interdependent relationships existing among microbiota and its host (1). The prospective impacts of gut microbiota have been documented in literature and are of an immune, metabolic, anti-cancerous, pro-carcinogenic and pro-inflammatory nature. Evidence suggested that the composition of microbiota may be affected by enduring treatment with microbes in the form of probiotics or by an influential high-fiber diet or by antibiotics (2). These studies have raised the possibility of playing with the varied microbiota species in the gut in order to have a futuristic control over upcoming adult pathological states (3,4).

Figure 1.
Major unrooted phylogenetic tree showing gut microbiota components in healthy adults. The size of the triangle indicates relative abundance, and the orientation of limbs denotes similar morphology.

The present review has also focused on the idea of utilization of probiotics to influence gut microbiota (2). Randomized controlled trials utilizing probiotic supplements in preterm infants for the prevention of various pediatric diseases such as sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis are being carried out by the scientists worldwide regardless of current evidence. There are increasing calls for observational studies to establish baseline data in these infants. Thus, it is clear that substantial research is being focused on the gut microbiota owing to its multi-factorial contribution in maintaining normal physiological homeostasis. We reviewed these developments pertaining to the importance of gut microbiota in pediatrics.

2. Various influences of gut microbiota

The observed important influxes triggered by microbiota (Fig. 2) are the result of competitive binding effect of harmful microorganisms, which do not allow beneficial bacteria adherence to gut mucosa (5,6). Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species of microorganisms have been observed to show supremacy in infant gut to promote local and systemic immune influences for the future prevention of adult pathological states such as eczema, allergic and inflammatory disorders (7). Moreover, the macrophage function in intestinal mucosa as well as in blood-brain barrier is affected by gut microbiota as it is observed to be associated with maturation of immune cells and signaling molecules (8). The important influences of gut microbiota is also warranted based on earlier pre-clinical studies which included germ-free mice showing lack of mature lymphatic system in the absence of beneficial bacteria (9). On the other hand, beneficial gut microbiota have also been observed to fortify the colonic defense barrier against various pathological states (10). Furthermore, in humans, the pathological state of viral gastroenteritis has been found to be significantly less in the infants with proper gut microbiota because of breast feeding as compared to infants who lack proper gut microbiota due to formula feeding. The above observation occurs due to the protective properties of gut bacteria, i.e., Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species that act by maintenance of acidic hostile environment for enteric viruses (11). Furthermore, gut microbiota offers protection via the production of bacteriocins that are known for their anti-enteropathogenic proteins (12). Scientific research is also being focused on these gut bacteria for the future use in medicinal applications (13).

Figure 2.
Interaction between gut microbiota, metabolites, inflammation and immunity at the gut mucosa. SCFA, short chain fatty acids; BCFA, branched chain fatty acids; SIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A.

3. Anti-carcinogenic effects of gut microbiota

The anti-carcinogenic properties of gut microbiota have been observed in an earlier study on Lactobaclli and Bifidobacteria strains (14). The study confirmed the unique abilities of these microbiota species as potential factors resulting in the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, and carcinogen degradation. In addition, these microorganisms have been shown to produce antioxidants that directly help in the prevention of carcinogenesis. The above observation was confirmed by later studies confirming the anti-carcinogenic properties of F. prausnitzii (a butyrate producer) and E. rectale against colon cancer in young patients (1517). The mechanism of action is mainly the lowering of colonic pH that resulted in anti-carcinogenic effect. Furthermore, the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs has been noted to be affected by the colonic pH (1820). Previously, it was confirmed that lack of complete gut bacteria, the capability mostly observed in preterm infants make them more vulnerable to deadly pathological state of cancer (21).

4. Influence of pribiotics, probiotics and symbiotics on gut microbiota

The term pribiotics involves specific ingredients that directly or indirectly affect beneficial gastrointestinal microflora in terms of composition as well as function. For instance, many carbohydrate-based ingredients are being utilized worldwide as pribiotics. The influential role of pribiotic Lactulose, is well documented for its medicinal effect to treat chronic condition of constipation in young infant and adults by stimulating the growth of Bifidobacteria and lactobacillus (1). Furthermore, prebiotics such as human milk oligosaccharides found in breast milk offer a progressive environment for the growth of beneficial bacteria, which in turn are useful in the fermentation of carbohydrates for energy purpose (1).

A class of microorganisms that are administered live in tolerable volumes into the human system and provide health benefits to host are collectively termed as probiotics (2). Studies currently in progress aim to utilize bacteria strains of breast milk as probiotics for medicinal purpose. The latest advanced techniques such as microencapsulation are being exploited for the utilization of bacterial strain in breast milk as probiotics (22). The nature of probiotic bacteria whether it is alive or dead did not affect its benefical probiotic effects, as confirmed in an earlier in vitro study (23). In addition, the change of nature of a probiotic enhances its efficacy, for example, heat-treated lactobacillus strains have been observed to be more stable with better probiotic effects (24,25). These probiotic mircrogainisms such as lactobacillus have been reported to offer protection against various infections on mucosal layers of vagina, oral mucosa and nasal mucosal surface (26). Previous experimental findings have confirmed that these properties differ in in vitro and in vivo environments (27). Additionally, the same probiotic microorganisms may show different properties in an infant or adult confirming the influence of age on probiotic effect (28). A previous study has also confirmed the role of the surrounding environment and cross contamination on the probiotic effect of certain microorganisms (29). Furthermore, when prebiotics and probiotics are combined, they are termed synbiotics. The most beneficial advantage of synbiotics in medicine is that they work simultaneously at two separate locations for example in human gut the pribiotic part of synbiotic was observed to be concentrated in the colon region while the probiotic part was seen more in the small intestine (30).

5. Therapeutic potential of probiotics and its influence on microbiota

Probiotics

The utilization of probiotics has proved its beneficial effects worldwide. The application of probiotics along with the diet has been observed to reduce necrotising enterocolitis in infants (31). Few pre-clinical studies have confirmed the protective potential of Bifidobacterium supplementation (32,33). To enhance the efficacy and applicability of probiotics different combinations of probiotics, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, have been utilized in preterm neonatal infants. In addition, a study on young infants undergoing antibiotics treatment evidenced a prominent increase in body weight gain following the administration of probiotics (34). New endeavors are being planned worldwide aiming towards the use of probiotics in the form of personalized medicine which currently consitutes the future of medical treatment (35).

Gut bacteria, cholesterol and morbid obesity

The gut bacteria Firmicutes has been observed to affect the concentration of serum cholesterol in infants that ultimately results in leanness in adulthood (36). The influence of gut bacteria on cholesterol synthesis has been studied in various animal studies (37,38). The major mechanisms responsible for the influence of gut bacteria on cholesterol synthesis include inhibition of a rate-limiting enzyme responsible for endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis, elevation in cholesterol excretion, reduction in cholesterol absorption by small intestine and stimulation of faecal bile acid loss (39). By contrast, a decrease in the gut bacteria has been observed to be associated with a rapid increase in cholesterol levels confirming the inverse relationship (40).

Gut microbiota and hormonal influences

The gut bacteria have been reported to influence hormone secretion as well as hormone interactions. Gut bacteria affect the release of hormones as well as certain signaling molecules, biologically active peptides that are specifically involved in the appetite regulation and control (41). Furthermore, a recent study showed the existence of a correlation among insulin resistance and intestinal microflora during a metabolic syndrome (42). In addition, a study has proven the inflicting role of microbiota on fat accumulation. The findings demonstrated that faecal transplantation of microbiota from obese mice caused elevation in body fat as compared to microflora from lean mice (43).

6. Gut microbiota and neurological development

The observed correlation of immunology and gut bacteria automatically links the latter with neurology (44). The gut bacteria indirectly influence the neurological system by affecting immune responses that in turn directly influence development of glial cells, cerebral vasculature and some neuronal pathways (45). The confirmatory studies in this regard in animals have proven the indirect effects of gut microbiota on neurological system by using mouse models of the relapsing-remitting inflammatory disease (46).

7. Safety aspects

The beneficial part of probiotics therapy was discussed above, but it is also associated with certain adverse effects. The adverse effects have short- and long-term implications (47). The observation of probiotic-related sepsis is one of the adverse effects reported in immunologically immature infants (48). In another study, Lactobacillus acidophilus sepsis was confirmed in a premature infant (49). However, in adults, Bifidobacterial strains resulted in wound abscesses following obstetric and gynecological procedures. Cerebral palsy is the result of adverse effects of the administration of high volumes of probiotics in premature infants (50). In view of the above literature, not a single probiotic study in preterm infants provided firm inference with regard to best combination of probiotics, appropriate dose of probiotics and effective timing and duration of probiotic treatment. Therefore, at present the results obtained in animal model studies are useful for understanding the influential world of probiotics.

In conclusion, the above citations demonstrate that gut microbiota play influential roles in safeguarding of normal homeostasis right from birth. Moreover, evidence requiring therapeutic potential indicate the importance of gut microbiota in the form of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics. However, more focused investigations are necessary in the area to manage safety aspects of probiotic therapeutics.

References

1. Vanhoutte T, De Preter V, De Brandt E, Verbeke K, Swings J, Huys G. Molecular monitoring of the fecal microbiota of healthy human subjects during administration of lactulose and Saccharomyces boulardii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5990–5997. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00233-06. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Tanriover MD, Aksoy DY, Unal S. Use of probiotics in various diseases: Evidence and promises. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2012;122:72–77. [PubMed]
3. Barker DJ. The malnourished baby and infant. Br Med Bull. 2001;60:69–88. doi: 10.1093/bmb/60.1.69. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Walker AW, Lawley TD. Therapeutic modulation of intestinal dysbiosis. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69:75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.09.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Chow J, Lee SM, Shen Y, Khosravi A, Mazmanian SK. Host-bacterial symbiosis in health and disease. Adv Immunol. 2010;107:243–274. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381300-8.00008-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K, Oshima K, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Tobe T, Clarke JM, Topping DL, Suzuki T, et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 2011;469:543–547. doi: 10.1038/nature09646. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Osborn DA, Sinn JK. Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4) 2007:CD006475. [PubMed]
8. Diamond B, Huerta PT, Tracey K, Volpe BT. It takes guts to grow a brain: Increasing evidence of the important role of the intestinal microflora in neuro- and immune-modulatory functions during development and adulthood. BioEssays. 2011;33:588–591. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100042. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Bouskra D, Brézillon C, Bérard M, Werts C, Varona R, Boneca IG, Eberl G. Lymphoid tissue genesis induced by commensals through NOD1 regulates intestinal homeostasis. Nature. 2008;456:507–510. doi: 10.1038/nature07450. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Prakash S, Rodes L, Coussa-Charley M, Tomaro-Duchesneau C. Gut microbiota: Next frontier in understanding human health and development of biotherapeutics. Biologics. 2011;5:71–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Plenge-Bönig A, Soto-Ramírez N, Karmaus W, Petersen G, Davis S, Forster J. Breastfeeding protects against acute gastroenteritis due to rotavirus in infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:1471–1476. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1245-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Hammami R, Fernandez B, Lacroix C, Fliss I. Anti-infective properties of bacteriocins: an update. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:2947–2967. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1202-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Benmechernene Z, Fernandez-No I, Kihal M, Böhme K, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velazquez J. Recent patents on bacteriocins: food and biomedical applications. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq. 2012;7:66–73. doi: 10.2174/1872215611307010010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Achuthan AA, Duary RK, Madathil A, Panwar H, Kumar H, Batish VK, Grover S. Antioxidative potential of lactobacilli isolated from the gut of Indian people. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:7887–7897. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1633-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Sobhani I, Tap J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roperch JP, Letulle S, Langella P, Corthier G, Van Tran Nhieu J, Furet JP. Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016393. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Cousin FJ, Jouan-Lanhouet S, Dimanche-Boitrel MT, Corcos L, Jan G. Milk fermented by Propionibacterium freudenreichii induces apoptosis of HGT-1 human gastric cancer cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031892. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Matthews GM, Howarth GS, Butler RN. Short-chain fatty acids induce apoptosis in colon cancer cells associated with changes to intracellular redox state and glucose metabolism. Chemotherapy. 2012;58:102–109. doi: 10.1159/000335672. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GV. Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-fluorouracil in the colon. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:5769–5779. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Rao Madhusudana K, Mallikarjuna B, Rao Krishna KS, Siraj S, Chowdoji Rao K, Subha MC. Novel thermo/pH sensitive nanogels composed from poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) for controlled release of an anticancer drug. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;102:891–897. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS. Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:4077–4088. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Griffin IJ, Cooke RJ. Development of whole body adiposity in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(Suppl 1):S19–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.023. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Cook MT, Tzortzis G, Charalampopoulos D, Khutoryanskiy VV. Microencapsulation of probiotics for gastrointestinal delivery. J Control Release. 2012;162:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Orlando A, Refolo MG, Messa C, Amati L, Lavermicocca P, Guerra V, Russo F. Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of viable or heat-killed Lactobacillus paracasei IMPC2.1 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in HGC-27 gastric and DLD-1 colon cell lines. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64:1103–1111. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2012.717676. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Fujiki T, Hirose Y, Yamamoto Y, Murosaki S. Enhanced immunomodulatory activity and stability in simulated digestive juices of Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 by heat treatment. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76:918–922. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110919. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Young SL, Simon MA, Baird MA, Tannock GW, Bibiloni R, Spencely K, Lane JM, Fitzharris P, Crane J, Town I, et al. Bifidobacterial species differentially affect expression of cell surface markers and cytokines of dendritic cells harvested from cord blood. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:686–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Strus M, Chmielarczyk A, Kochan P, Adamski P, Chełmicki Z, Chełmicki A, Pałucha A, Heczko PB. Studies on the effects of probiotic Lactobacillus mixture given orally on vaginal and rectal colonization and on parameters of vaginal health in women with intermediate vaginal flora. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;163:210–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.05.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Ibnou-Zekri N, Blum S, Schiffrin EJ, von der Weid T. Divergent patterns of colonization and immune response elicited from two intestinal Lactobacillus strains that display similar properties in vitro. Infect Immun. 2003;71:428–436. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.1.428-436.2003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Romeo J, Nova E, Wärnberg J, Gómez-Martínez S, Díaz Ligia LE, Marcos A. Immunomodulatory effect of fibres, probiotics and synbiotics in different life-stages. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:341–349. [PubMed]
29. Broekaert IJ, Nanthakumar NN, Walker WA. Secreted probiotic factors ameliorate enteropathogenic infection in zinc-deficient human Caco-2 and T84 cell lines. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:139–144. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31809fd85e. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Roberfroid M. Prebiotics: The concept revisited. J Nutr. 2007;137(Suppl 2):830S–837S. [PubMed]
31. Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S. Probiotics for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates with very low birthweight: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2007;369:1614–1620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60748-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Caplan MS, Miller-Catchpole R, Kaup S, Russell T, Lickerman M, Amer M, Xiao Y, Thomson R., Jr Bifidobacterial supplementation reduces the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in a neonatal rat model. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:577–583. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70450-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Wang C, Shoji H, Sato H, Nagata S, Ohtsuka Y, Shimizu T, Yamashiro Y. Effects of oral administration of bifidobacterium breve on fecal lactic acid and short-chain fatty acids in low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44:252–257. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000252184.89922.5f. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Mohan R, Koebnick C, Schildt J, Mueller M, Radke M, Blaut M. Effects of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 supplementation on body weight, fecal pH, acetate, lactate, calprotectin, and IgA in preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2008;64:418–422. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318181b7fa. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Rougé C, Butel MJ, Piloquet H, Ferraris L, Legrand A, Vodovar M, Voyer M, de la Cochetière MF, Darmaun D, Rozé JC. Fecal calprotectin excretion in preterm infants during the neonatal period. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011083. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Parnell JA, Raman M, Rioux KP, Reimer RA. The potential role of prebiotic fibre for treatment and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and associated obesity and insulin resistance. Liver Int. 2012;32:701–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02730.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
37. Kumar M, Nagpal R, Kumar R, Hemalatha R, Verma V, Kumar A, Chakraborty C, Singh B, Marotta F, Jain S, et al. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics as potential biotherapeutics for metabolic diseases. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:902917. doi: 10.1155/2012/902917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Pavlović N, Stankov K, Mikov M. Probiotics - interactions with bile acids and impact on cholesterol metabolism. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168:1880–1895. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9904-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Jones ML, Martoni CJ, Parent M, Prakash S. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr. 2012;107:1505–1513. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004703. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Santacruz A, Collado MC, García-Valdés L, Segura MT, Martín-Lagos JA, Anjos T, Martí-Romero M, Lopez RM, Florido J, Campoy C, et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:83–92. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000176. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Holzer P, Reichmann F, Farzi A. Neuropeptide Y, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide in the gut-brain axis. Neuropeptides. 2012;46:261–274. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2012.08.005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
42. Aroniadis OC, Brandt LJ. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Past, present and future. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013;29:79–84. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32835a4b3e. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
43. Vrieze A, Holleman F, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Hoekstra JB, Nieuwdorp M. The environment within: How gut microbiota may influence metabolism and body composition. Diabetologia. 2010;53:606–613. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1662-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Björkholm B, Samuelsson A, Hibberd ML, Forssberg H, Pettersson S. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3047–3052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010529108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Greenwood J, Heasman SJ, Alvarez JI, Prat A, Lyck R, Engelhardt B. Review: leucocyte-endothelial cell crosstalk at the blood-brain barrier: a prerequisite for successful immune cell entry to the brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011;37:24–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01140.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
46. Berer K, Krishnamoorthy G. Commensal gut flora and brain autoimmunity: A love or hate affair? Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:639–651. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0949-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Kalliomäki M, Isolauri E. Role of intestinal flora in the development of allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;3:15–20. doi: 10.1097/00130832-200302000-00003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Saxelin M, Lassig A, Karjalainen H, Tynkkynen S, Surakka A, Vapaatalo H, Järvenpää S, Korpela R, Mutanen M, Hatakka K. Persistence of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract when administered as capsules, yoghurt, or cheese. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;144:293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.009. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Thompson C, McCarter YS, Krause PJ, Herson VC. Lactobacillus acidophilus sepsis in a neonate. J Perinatol. 2001;21:258–260. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200509. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Halliday HL, Ehrenkranz RA, Doyle LW. Early (<8 days) postnatal corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD001146. [PubMed]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications