Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Clin Cell Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4904842

Genetically Modified T-cell Therapy for the Treatment of Osteosarcoma: An Update


While patients with localized osteosarcoma have excellent survival rates, the prognosis for those with advanced disease is significantly worse despite aggressive multimodality therapies [1]. To overcome these limitations novel treatments are needed, especially for children and young adults with metastatic and/or recurrent osteosarcoma, whose poor rates of survival have remained relatively unchanged for decades. Immunotherapy with genetically modified T cells (Figure 1) offers a promising alternative to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies because T-cell killing does not rely on mechanisms employed by these cytotoxic agents [2,3].

Figure 1
Cell therapy with genetically modified T cells. Blood is drawn from patients, T cells are expanded and genetically modified in the laboratory before they are reinfused into patients.

In this communication, we briefly summarize our recent article detailing genetically modified T-cell therapy for osteosarcoma [4], as well as describe our experience using HER2-CAR T cells in a phase I clinical trial for patients with HER2-positive osteosarcoma [5]. Furthermore, we highlight additional immunomodulatory maneuvers that may enhance the efficacy of genetically modified T-cell therapy for the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma.

Genetically Modified T cells for Osteosarcoma: A Brief Review

Successful gene transfer strategies include the forced expression of antigen-specific α/β T-cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) [6]. Conventional TCRs are composed of α and β chains, and recognize peptide fragments presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Compared to genetically modifying T cells with CARs, generating tumor-specific T cells by forced expression of TCRs is cumbersome. Despite the inherent difficulty of synthesizing large numbers of α/β TCR-modified T cells, clinical studies using this approach demonstrate the potency of adoptively transferred α/β TCR-modified T cells for multiple cancer types, including NY-ESO-1-specific T cells for patients with synovial sarcoma [711]. Therefore active exploration of α/β TCR-modified T-cell therapy is warranted for patients with osteosarcoma.

CAR T cells have several advantages over α/β TCR T cells because CAR T cells recognize and kill tumor cells in a MHC unrestricted fashion. Therefore, target recognition by CAR T cells is unaffected by some of the major mechanisms by which tumors avoid MHC-restricted T-cell (α/β TCR) recognition, such as downregulation of HLA class I molecules and defective antigen processing. CARs consist of an extracellular domain (ectodomain) that confers antigen specificity, a hinge region, transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain (endodomain) [12]. The most commonly used method to generate extracellular CAR domains is by joining the heavy and light chain variable regions derived from monoclonal antibodies. Because CARs are derived from monoclonal antibodies, CAR T cells combine the antigen-binding property of monoclonal antibodies with the lytic capacity and self-renewal of T cells. CAR endodomains are typically derived from the T-cell receptor CD3-ζ chain, which can be combined with costimulatory molecules such as CD28 or 41BB. CAR nomenclature is based on the number of costimulatory domains contained within the intracellular CAR construct. CARs containing zero costimulatory domains are dubbed first generation, one costimulatory domain denotes second generation, and two costimulatory domains denotes third generation CARs (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Basic design of chimeric antigen receptors. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) consist of an antigen binding domain, a spacer/hinge region, a transmembrane domain, and an endodomain that consists of domains derived from costimulatory molecules and CD3-z. ...

Of the multiple tumor associated antigens expressed by osteosarcoma cells, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2, disialoganglioside (GD)2, interleukin (IL)11Rα, fibroblast activation protein, and B7-H3 [1317] are expressed on the tumor cell surface, making them viable CAR T-cell targets. We have focused on targeting HER2 with CAR T cells. Although osteosarcoma tumors are often HER2-positive, the HER2 gene is not amplified in this disease [18]. Thus, osteosarcoma is part of a group of tumors that express HER2 at levels too low for HER2 monoclonal antibodies to be effective [19]. We and others have shown that malignancies that express HER2 at low levels can be targeted with T cells that express HER2-CARs [13], and recently implemented a phase I clinical study using HER2-CAR T cells for the immunotherapy of HER2-positive sarcomas [5], with most patients enrolled having a diagnosis of osteosarcoma.

HER2-CAR T cells for Patients with Osteosarcoma

In a phase I clinical trial we evaluated the feasibility and safety of administering escalating doses of 2nd generation HER2-CAR (HER2.CD28.ζ-CAR) T cells for patients with recurrent/refractory HER2-positive sarcomas [5]. Sixteen of 19 patients who received HER2-CAR T cells were diagnosed with osteosarcoma. We began our study with an ultra-low dose of HER2-CAR T cells (1 × 104/m2) and escalated over eight dose levels to a maximum dose of 1 × 108/m2 T cells. HER2-CAR T cells were successfully generated for all patients. In regards to safety, none of the patients had adverse events related to the T-cell infusion, except for one patient on the highest dose level, who developed fever within 12 hours after T-cell infusion, which resolved with ibuprofen. Additionally, all patients enrolled had pre-infusion echocardiograms demonstrating normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the LVEF remained normal in all patients six weeks after T-cell infusion. In combination, these results demonstrate the feasibility of generating HER2-CAR T cells from the peripheral blood of patients previously treated with multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapies, and illustrate the safety of HER2-CAR T cells administered to patients with HER2-positive osteosarcoma at doses up to 1 × 108/m2.

Because efficacy of CAR T cells depends upon persistence of the infused T-cell product [20], we assessed persistence of HER2-CAR T cells by quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In patients who received T-cell doses from 1 × 105/m2 and higher, we detected HER2-CAR T cells in the peripheral blood of 14 of 16 patients, and the copy number correlated with the infused T-cell dose. Despite our ability to detect HER2-CAR T cells, 3 hours after T-cell infusion there was a rapid decline in the frequency of HER2-CAR T cells in the peripheral blood of all patients, demonstrating a lack of T-cell expansion. Despite the lack of expansion, low-levels of HER2-CAR T cells were detected 6 weeks after infusion in 7 of 9 evaluable patients who received greater than 1 × 106/m2 T cells. Furthermore, at 3 months we detected HER2-CAR T cells in 4 of 13 evaluable patients. Thus, although we found no evidence for HER2-CAR T cell expansion after infusion, HER2-CAR T cells persisted long term in some patients.

Clinical response to T-cell infusion was evaluated by comparing disease identified by imaging obtained before HER2-CAR T cell infusion to images obtained 6 weeks after infusion. Of 17 evaluable patients, 4 had stable disease for 12 weeks to 14 months. Three patients with stable disease received no additional therapy and had their residual tumor removed. A sample from one of these patients showed >90% necrosis, demonstrating antitumor activity of infused HER2-CAR T cells. All three patients remain in remission with no further treatment until now with a follow up of >3 years. Although HER2 expression was measured and objectively graded for all patients on this study, we were unable to establish a relationship between tumor HER2 expression and clinical response because the sample size was insufficient for such an analysis. In future clinical trials we plan to evaluate whether HER2-CAR T cells have greater efficacy for patients with high HER2-expressing osteosarcoma compared to those expressing relatively low HER2 levels. Data from this study show that a safe dose of HER2-CAR T cells can be established for patients with HER2-positive osteosarcoma, and these cells can persist at low levels for more than 6 weeks in a dose-dependent manner. Despite these encouraging findings, clinical benefit of HER2-CAR T cells was limited, indicating that further manipulation of the immune system will be essential to enhance outcomes for patients with osteosarcoma.

Immune Modulation to Enhance T-cell Therapy for Osteosarcoma

T-cell expansion and long-term persistence of adoptively transferred T cells has been observed in patients receiving lymphodepleting chemotherapy [21]. Due to serious safety concerns, which arose after a single patient developed fatal acute respiratory failure following the administration of 1 × 1010 third generation HER2-CAR T cells, derived from the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, in combination with IL-2 and lymphodepleting chemotherapy [22], we conducted our clinical study with HER2-CAR T cells without lymphodepletion. Since we have now established a safe dose (1 × 108/m2) of HER2-CAR T cells, we are currently evaluating the safety and clinical benefits of lymphodepleting patients with fludarabine +/− cyclophosphamide prior to the infusion of 1 × 108/m2 HER2-CAR T cells.

An alternative, or perhaps complimentary strategy, to enhance the efficacy of CAR T-cells for osteosarcoma is to combine CAR T cells with one or more checkpoint antibodies now becoming available for cancer immunotherapy. Intriguingly, Lussier and colleagues demonstrated in human osteosarcoma samples that metastatic but not primary osteosarcoma tumors express the T-cell inhibitory ligand program death ligand 1 (PD-L1) [23]. They also provide evidence that cytotoxic T cells infiltrating human metastatic osteosarcomas upregulate programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), implicating this T-cell inhibitory pathway as a contributing factor to osteosarcoma induced suppression of cytotoxic T cells. Furthermore, blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway using monoclonal antibody resulted in decreased tumor burden and increased survival in a murine osteosarcoma model system [23]. In a separate article, Lussier and colleagues demonstrate that T cells infiltrating osteosarcoma tumors upregulate CTLA-4, another receptor involved in decreasing activation of cytotoxic T-cells [24]. Based on these findings osteosarcoma bearing mice were treated with antibodies against both PD-L1 and CTLA-4. This combinational therapy significantly enhanced anti-osteosarcoma activity compared to mice that received either antibody alone. Importantly, a phase I clinical trial is currently underway to test the safety and efficacy of PD-1 antibody alone, or in combination with CTLA-4 antibody for the treatment of children, adolescents and young adults with osteosarcoma and other solid tumors (NCT02304458). In a separate phase I clinical trial, GD-2 CAR T cells given in combination with PD-1 antibody is being evaluated for patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma (NCT01822652). Targeting PD-L1 directly with PD-L1-speciifc CAR T cells is not an option since PD-L1 is expressed on a broad array of normal cells, however investigators have shown that it is possible to express chimeric PD-1 receptors on the cell surface of T cells that consist of the PD-1 ecto- and transmembrane domains, and the CD28 costimulatory endodomain to convert the ‘negative’ PD-L1 into a ‘positive’ costimulatory signal [25]. Given these findings, clinical trials using PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 antibody in combination with genetically modified T cells for the immunotherapy of osteosarcoma are likely to be developed in the near-term future.

Another method to disrupt the T-cell inhibitory PD-1/PD-L1 axis is by genetically modifying T cells to silence PD-1 expression or disrupt the PD-1 gene locus. Su and colleagues demonstrate that PD-1 can successfully be downregulated using a state of the art CRISPR/Cas9 immune editing system [26]. Reducing PD-1 did not affect the viability or persistence of primary human T cells cultured in vitro. Furthermore, immune responses of T cells genetically modified to downregulate PD-1 were enhanced, as evidenced by increased IFN-γ secretion upon recognition of target antigen, and enhanced killing of PD-L1 positive melanoma cells. Thus disrupting the PD-1 gene locus in CAR T cells has the potential to render T-cells resistant to osteosarcoma induced immunosuppression, and enhance anti-osteosarcoma activity.

Beyond Genetic Modification That Renders T cells Tumor Antigen Specific

As already discussed in the last section, a ‘2nd genetic modification’ of CAR T cells holds the promise to further enhance antitumor activity. Conceptually these can be divided into strategies to i) overcome immune escape by targeting multiple tumor antigens, ii) enhance T-cell expansion and persistence by transgenic expression of cytokines, cytokine receptors, chimeric cytokine receptors or silencing negative regulators, iii) increase T-cell trafficking to tumors, iv) render T cells resistant to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and v) to increase safety. With few exceptions [27,28], these strategies have been mainly evaluated in preclinical models with encouraging results. Several detailed reviews have been recently published on this topic [2934], and we refer the interested reader to these publications.


Genetically modified T cells have shown potent antitumor activity in multiple preclinical osteosarcoma models, and initial safety data in the first clinical experience using HER2-CAR T cells for patients with HER2-positive osteosarcoma is encouraging. However, several challenges remain including limited in vivo CAR T-cell expansion and persistence, and overcoming the inhibitory tumor microenvironment. We and others believe that CAR T-cell therapy for the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma remains promising. However, combinatorial immune modulating therapies and/or additional genetic modification strategies will be necessary before CAR T cells will have a major impact in the clinical management of this devastating solid tumor.


The authors received support for their solid tumor research from NIH grants 1R01CA148748-01A1, 1R01CA173750-01, P01CA094237, and 5K12CA090433-14, CPRIT grant RP101335, The V Foundation, Rally Foundation for Childhood Cancer Research, The Truth 365, Sarcoma Foundation of America, and Cookies for Kid’s Cancer.


1. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Branscheid D, Carrle D, Friedel G, et al. Second and subsequent recurrences of osteosarcoma: presentation, treatment, and outcomes of 249 consecutive cooperative osteosarcoma study group patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:557–565. [PubMed]
2. Buddingh EP, Schilham MW, Ruslan SE, Berghuis D, Szuhai K, et al. Chemotherapy-resistant osteosarcoma is highly susceptible to IL-15- activated allogeneic and autologous NK cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60:575–586. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Rainusso N, Brawley VS, Ghazi A, Hicks MJ, Gottschalk S, et al. Immunotherapy targeting HER2 with genetically modified T cells eliminates tumor-initiating cells in osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2012;19:212–217. [PubMed]
4. DeRenzo C, Gottschalk S. Genetically modified T-cell therapy for osteosarcoma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;804:323–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Ahmed N, Brawley VS, Hegde M, Robertson C, Ghazi A, et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for the Immunotherapy of HER2-Positive Sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1688–1696. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:299–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Cassard L, Yang JC, et al. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood. 2009;114:535–546. [PubMed]
8. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006;314:126–129. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Morgan RA, Chinnasamy N, Abate-Daga D, Gros A, Robbins PF, et al. Cancer regression and neurological toxicity following anti-MAGE-A3 TCR gene therapy. J Immunother. 2013;36:133–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Parkhurst MR, Yang JC, Langan RC, Dudley ME, Nathan DA, et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol Ther. 2011;19:620–626. [PubMed]
11. Robbins PF, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:917–924. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Rivière I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:388–398. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Ahmed N, Salsman VS, Yvon E, Louis CU, Perlaky L, et al. Immunotherapy for osteosarcoma: genetic modification of T cells overcomes low levels of tumor antigen expression. Mol Ther. 2009;17:1779–1787. [PubMed]
14. Roth M, Linkowski M, Tarim J, Piperdi S, Sowers R, et al. Ganglioside GD2 as a therapeutic target for antibody-mediated therapy in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2014;120:548–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Huang G, Yu L, Cooper LJ, Hollomon M, Huls H, et al. Genetically modified T cells targeting interleukin-11 receptor alpha-chain kill human osteosarcoma cells and induce the regression of established osteosarcoma lung metastases. Cancer Res. 2012;72:271–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Yuan D, Liu B, Liu K, Zhu G, Dai Z, et al. Overexpression of fibroblast activation protein and its clinical implications in patients with osteosarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:157–162. [PubMed]
17. Modak S, Kramer K, Gultekin SH, Guo HF, Cheung NK. Monoclonal antibody 8H9 targets a novel cell surface antigen expressed by a wide spectrum of human solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4048–4054. [PubMed]
18. Somers GR, Ho M, Zielenska M, Squire JA, Thorner PS. HER2 amplification and overexpression is not present in pediatric osteosarcoma: a tissue microarray study. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005;8:525–532. [PubMed]
19. Ebb D, Meyers P, Grier H, Bernstein M, Gorlick R, et al. Phase II trial of trastuzumab in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2545–2551. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dotti G, Pule M, Yvon E, et al. Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. Blood. 2011;118:6050–6056. [PubMed]
21. Dudley ME, Yang JC, Sherry R, Hughes MS, Royal R, et al. Adoptive cell therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: evaluation of intensive myeloablative chemoradiation preparative regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5233–5239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, et al. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther. 2010;18:843–851. [PubMed]
23. Lussier DM, O’Neill L, Nieves LM, McAfee MS, Holechek SA, et al. Enhanced T-cell immunity to osteosarcoma through antibody blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions. J Immunother. 2015;38:96–106. [PubMed]
24. Lussier DM, Johnson JL, Hingorani P, Blattman JN. Combination immunotherapy with α-CTLA-4 and α-PD-L1 antibody blockade prevents immune escape and leads to complete control of metastatic osteosarcoma. J Immunother. 2015;3:21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Prosser ME, Brown CE, Shami AF, Forman SJ, Jensen MC. Tumor PD-L1 costimulates primary human CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells modified to express a PD1:CD28 chimeric receptor. Mol Immunol. 2012;51:263–272. [PubMed]
26. Su S, Hu B, Shao J, Shen B, Du J, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated efficient PD-1 disruption on human primary T cells from cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20070. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Di Stasi A, Tey SK, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1673–1683. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Zhang L, Morgan RA, Beane JD, Zheng Z, Dudley ME, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes genetically engineered with an inducible gene encoding interleukin-12 for the immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2278–2288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Pegram HJ, Park JH, Brentjens RJ. CD28z CARs and armored CARs. Cancer J. 2014;20:127–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Dotti G, Gottschalk S, Savoldo B, Brenner MK. Design and development of therapies using chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells. Immunol Rev. 2014;257:107–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Mata M, Gottschalk S. Adoptive cell therapy for sarcoma. Immunotherapy. 2015;7:21–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Priceman SJ, Forman SJ, Brown CE. Smart CARs engineered for cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27:466–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Maus MV, Powell DJ., Jr Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: New Approaches to Improve Their Efficacy and Reduce Toxicity. Cancer J. 2015;21:475–479. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Chmielewski M, Abken H. TRUCKs: the fourth generation of CARs. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1145–1154. [PubMed]