PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of acssdACS PublicationsThis JournalSearchSubmit a manuscript
Nano Letters
 
Nano Lett. 2016 June 8; 16(6): 3507–3513.
Published online 2016 May 11. doi:  10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00315
PMCID: PMC4901366

Synthesis, Morphological, and Electro-optical Characterizations of Metal/Semiconductor Nanowire Heterostructures

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nl-2016-003155_0006.jpg

In this letter, we demonstrate the formation of unique Ga/GaAs/Si nanowire heterostructures, which were successfully implemented in nanoscale light-emitting devices with visible room temperature electroluminescence. Based on our recent approach for the integration of InAs/Si heterostructures into Si nanowires by ion implantation and flash lamp annealing, we developed a routine that has proven to be suitable for the monolithic integration of GaAs nanocrystallite segments into the core of silicon nanowires. The formation of a Ga segment adjacent to longer GaAs nanocrystallites resulted in Schottky-diode-like I/V characteristics with distinct electroluminescence originating from the GaAs nanocrystallite for the nanowire device operated in the reverse breakdown regime. The observed electroluminescence was ascribed to radiative band-to-band recombinations resulting in distinct emission peaks and a low contribution due to intraband transition, which were also observed under forward bias. Simulations of the obtained nanowire heterostructure confirmed the proposed impact ionization process responsible for hot carrier luminescence. This approach may enable a new route for on-chip photonic devices used for light emission or detection purposes.

Keywords: Nanowires, heterostructures, Schottky, GaAs, Si, electroluminescence

A successful implementation of a new class of materials or means of processing has a potential impact on long-term future technology nodes. Fundamental investigations of electronic and optical properties of nanowire (NW) heterostructures thus triggered tremendous research on novel device concepts.13 Particularly, integrating photonic devices into the Si platform is a challenge that requires the development of elaborate device designs.4 Nanoscale Si-based photonic devices would provide full compatibility with mature IC manufacturing processes; yet owing to the inherent disadvantages of the indirect Si band gap, no efficient light emission can be obtained. A hybrid Si platform, integrating III–V functionality into Si nanostructures, would give access to a wide range of high-speed electronic and high-performance photonic applications. However, the diverse natures of the III–V and Si device approaches, material technologies, and processing have posed a significant obstacle in the route for Si-based hybrid optoelectronic systems in the past. Within the last years, a few approaches for Si-based hybrid NW formation via bottom-up growth techniques5,6 or in combination with substrate etching7 were presented, which are restricted to semiconductors, with limitations in epitaxial integration and in retaining the NW morphology. Recently, we published a novel approach for integrating III–V nanocrystallites (NCs) into Si NWs by combining ion implantation and flash lamp annealing, yielding InAs/Si NW heterostructures.8 Within this study we present this approach to be capable for integrating GaAs NCs into crystalline Si NWs. Due to a modification of the ion implantation routine, NCs with increased axial lengths are obtained, exhibiting a metallic Ga segment adjacent to the GaAs NCs. Such wired NC configuration ensures directed current flow through the abrupt heterointerfaces.

We achieved the monolithic integration of GaAs and Ga/GaAs NCs into Si NWs by exploring ion implantation and flash lamp annealing (FLA) routines. Such application of mature semiconductor processing techniques9 allows to process wafer-scale NW samples along with excellent control of NW morphologies. The main processing steps for NW heterostructure formation are sketched in Figure Figure11a.

Figure 1
Processing and material characterization of Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures. (a) Processing scheme: epitaxial VLS-grown Si [left angle bracket]111[right angle bracket] NWs covered with 20 nm SiO2; room temperature ion implantation of Ga and As (2 at% each) with samples mounted ...

The samples consisted of [left angle bracket]111[right angle bracket] oriented zinc-blende Si NWs epitaxially grown on Si(111) substrates via the gold-catalyzed vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) approach.10 A low pressure chemical vapor deposition system was utilized for NW growth, using SiH4 (2% diluted in He) as precursor gas, a growth temperature of T = 788 K and a total pressure of p = 4 mbar, which resulted in epitaxial and single crystalline NWs with typical lengths of 10 μm and mean diameters of about 130 nm. Prior to high fluence implantation of Ga and As ions, the gold catalyst was removed, and a 20 nm thick SiO2 layer had to be deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, acting as a protective mold during implantation and millisecond FLA. In order to achieve a homogeneous ion distribution and to avoid bending of the NWs due to high fluence ion bombardment,11 samples were mounted on a 45° tilted stage and continuously rotated during ion implantation. Due to nanostructure-related peculiarities of ion beam induced sputtering, implantation parameters were derived from 3D Monte Carlo simulations using iradina.12 Ga and As ions were implanted alternatingly, resulting in a nominal concentration of 2 at % Ga and 2 at % As inside the NW core. Full amorphization and a significant shortening as well as a change of the NW cross-section from hexagonal to circular was observed due to plastic deformation of NWs during ion implantation.13 Remarkably, the SiO2 shell was found to persist during implantation with little intermixing at the interface to the Si core (see Supporting Information 1). Finally the phase separation and actual formation of NW heterostructures by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE)14 was induced by a 3 min preheating at 600 °C and subsequent 20 ms FLA, whereby the SiO2 shell stabilized the molten core of the NWs. FLA was performed in Ar atmosphere with a flash energy of 54.2 J/cm2, resulting in peak sample temperatures of approximately 1470 K.8 Within the cooling period after FLA, GaAs NCs formed with lengths varying from approximately 10 nm to 1 μm (cf. Supporting Information 2). In addition, an adjacent Ga segment was observed for NCs exceeding a length of about 75 nm.

The composition, morphology, and crystallinity of such obtained NW heterostructures were analyzed in detail by μ-Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figure Figure11b shows a typical μ-Raman spectrum acquired from the GaAs NC depicted in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image. The main Raman features were identified as the transverse optical (TO) phonon mode of crystalline GaAs (peak I), a GaAs related surface phonon mode due to the cylindrical shape of the GaAs NC (peak II),15 and GaAs local vibrational modes (peak III).16 The occurrence of GaAs local vibrational modes indicates a high concentration of Si atoms occupying Ga or As lattice sites. As the excitation laser spot exceeds the GaAs NC size, Raman features arising from the adjacent Si NW (peak IV, V) were also detected (see Supporting Information 3).

Extensive high resolution TEM (HRTEM) and EDX analysis confirmed composition and crystallinity of both the Si and GaAs segments with abrupt interfaces as indicated by Raman investigations (see Supporting Information 4). Although a rapid annealing step was applied, consisting of melting of the NW core during the 20 ms FLA step and recrystallization during subsequent cooling, only a low number of crystallographic defects of the NW heterostructure were observed in TEM investigations (see Supporting Information 5). As mentioned above, for larger GaAs NCs, we observed the formation of amorphous Ga segments, separating the GaAs NCs from the Si NW core. Previous investigations indicated a liquid state for nanoscale Ga droplets at room temperature,17 which may also apply for the observed amorphous structure of the Ga segments. Further EDX revealed As within the recrystallized Si NWs, thus expecting n-type doping of the Si NW. In the HRTEM images of Figure Figure11c, the respective interfaces of the axially aligned Si/Ga/GaAs/Si segments are shown. Remarkably, the Si NWs, although fully amorphous after ion implantation, recrystallize in [left angle bracket]111[right angle bracket] directions along the NW axis during LPE, which is also the predominant growth direction for VLS-grown Si NWs with diameters above 40 nm.18 The embedded zinc-blende GaAs NCs adopt the crystallite direction of the Si NW as shown in the fast Fourier transform patterns in Figure Figure11c. Furthermore, the amorphous Ga segment formed next to larger GaAs NCs exhibits an abrupt interface to both the GaAs and the Si NWs.

To determine the electrical transport properties of wired GaAs NCs embedded in Si NWs, individual NW heterostructures were integrated in four-terminal and two-terminal (cf. inset in Figure Figure22a) devices resembling a back-gated NW field effect transistor with a 120 nm thick SiO2 layer as gate dielectric and the substrate as common gate. Electrical contacts to nanowire devices were processed by e-beam lithography, e-beam evaporation of Ni, and lift off techniques.

Figure 2
Electrical characterization of selected NW heterostructures. (a) I/V characteristics of a processed Si NW without NCs (NW1), a Si NW heterostructure with a GaAs NC (NW2), and four Si NWs with Ga/GaAs NCs (NW3–NW6). Axial lengths of the GaAs NCs ...

The I/V characteristics of a contacted Si NW without a NC exhibits linear behavior (NW1 in Figure Figure22a) and four-terminal measurements revealed a resistivity of 1.1 mΩ·cm. Unambiguously n-type doping was confirmed by thermoelectric measurements on individually contacted Si NWs (see Supporting Information 6). Assuming As as the dopant, this corresponds to a bulk impurity concentration of approximately 8.6 × 1019 cm–3 and thus degenerate doping of the Si NWs.19 Due to the high doping of the Si NW and the present SiO2 shell, influences of surface states or adsorbates on the electronic structure of the NW core were assumed to be negligible. Furthermore, the low resistivity of the Si NWs impeded the use of capacity-dependent scanning probe microscopy to investigate NW doping.

For the NWs with GaAs NCs and Ga/GaAs hybrids, no such direct experimental determination of the doping type could be achieved. However, as GaAs grown from a Si-rich high temperature melt by LPE results in n-type GaAs crystals,20 n-type doping was also assumed to be prevailing in the present GaAs NCs. Furthermore, rectifying Ga/GaAs contacts only form with n-type GaAs,21 which agrees well with the Schottky-type behavior of the Ga/GaAs heterostructures (NW3–NW6 in Figure Figure22a). The resistivity of the GaAs NCs was measured to be approximately 6 Ω·cm, which corresponds to an effective impurity concentration of 1.5 × 1014 cm–3 in n-type GaAs.19 However, Raman investigations (cf. Supporting Information 3) indicate considerably higher Si impurity concentrations of about 5 × 1018 cm–3.22 Thus, we can conclude that, due to the amphoteric nature of Si dopants in GaAs, compensation doping results in overall moderately doped n-type GaAs NCs.

The highly n-type doped Si NWs aligned with a 124 nm long GaAs NC (NW2 in Figure Figure22a) results in a quantum-barrier-like structure with a barrier height for conduction electrons of about 67.8 meV (see simulation results in Supporting Information 7). In contrast to the n-type Si NWs for which ohmic behavior was observed (cf. NW1), a strongly nonlinear but symmetric behavior is observed, which is typical for field-induced tunneling currents that increase steeply when the effective tunneling barrier narrows for ascending bias voltages. Temperature-dependent I/V measurements, at a small bias voltage of 10 mV to minimize band-bending and tunneling effects, yielded an effective barrier height of approximately 50 meV, which is in reasonable agreement with semiclassical device simulations (see Supporting Information 7).

For NW heterostructures with a Ga segment adjacent to the GaAs NC, the Ga/GaAs Schottky junction dominates the I/V characteristics, resulting in a distinct rectifying behavior (NW3–NW6 in Figure Figure22a). I/V characteristics are further labeled forward (reverse) for positive (negative) bias VSD applied to the NW end facing the Ga segment. According to the simulated energy band diagram under forward bias (right panel in Figure Figure33) conduction electrons encounter the small barrier at the Si/GaAs interface with a turn on voltage of around 0.2–0.6 V.

Figure 3
Simulated energy band diagrams. Band diagrams of a Ga/GaAs/Si heterostructure similar to NW4, calculated with the semiclassical device simulator Minimos-NT under reverse (left panel), zero (center panel), and forward (right panel) bias conditions. EV ...

For such Si NW heterostructures containing a Ga/GaAs segment, Schottky barrier heights in the range of 186–330 meV were obtained from temperature-dependent I/V measurements. With e the elementary charge, χ = 4.07 eV the electron affinity and eϕm = 4.3 eV the work function of GaAs,23 the Schottky barrier height of an ideal Ga/GaAs junction can be calculated to eϕ = eϕm – χ ≈ 230 meV. In literature, Schottky barrier heights of Ga/n-GaAs junctions are usually larger than 1 eV, owing to Fermi level pinning caused by defects at the interface.21 Thus, a reasonable low number of interface defects due to the absence of Fermi level pinning can be assumed for the obtained Ga/GaAs Schottky junctions within NW heterostructures.

Under reverse bias conditions, the voltage is supported across the drift region of the Schottky contact with the maximum electric field located at the Ga/GaAs interface. Due to a weak barrier lowering, the leakage current rises gradually with reverse bias as thermally excited electrons in the metal surmount the barrier. However, as the field increases further, a fraction of high energy carriers fail to lose energy by phonon emission, attaining energies in excess of the material bandgap and lose energy by creating electron–hole pairs, a process generally known as impact ionization.24,25 At a crucial breakdown field, these generated carriers gain sufficient energies to induce further impact ionizations cascades leading to avalanche carrier multiplication (left panel in Figure Figure33).

Simulations of the reverse biased NW heterostructure yielded high impact ionization rates in the GaAs NC next to the Schottky interface, proportional to the applied bias (see Supporting Information 8). Since negligible voltage is supported within the metal and the degenerately doped Si NW, the reverse blocking capability of the Schottky rectifier is governed by the GaAs NC, and the breakdown voltage thereby appears to be linearly dependent on the length of the NC, as shown in Figure Figure22b.

Operating the Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure devices under reverse bias in the avalanche breakdown regime resulted in broadband light emission, clearly originating from the GaAs NCs. In Figure Figure44 an SEM image of the two-terminal device (Figure Figure44a) and an optical microscope image (Figure Figure44b) are shown, demonstrating distinct electroluminescence (EL) of NW4 under reverse bias conditions. The associated EL spectrum for the device operated under reverse and forward bias conditions is depicted in Figure Figure44c. The measured EL spectra were corrected according to transmission data obtained from calibrating the spectroscopy equipment with a calibrated halogen light source.

Figure 4
Room temperature EL of a Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructure device. (a) SEM image, showing the two-terminal device (NW4) with a Ga segment next to a 180 nm long GaAs NC. (b) Optical microscope image (1 min exposure time) of the same device under reverse bias ...

Pronounced features were observed in the EL spectra above the GaAs band gap energy EG = 1.42 eV, which are assigned to radiative band-to-band (b–b) recombinations. A continuous background in the EL spectrum extending to the near-infrared is ascribed to intraband transitions, or Bremsstrahlung.26,27

Under high forward biases, the weak EL appears to be consisting of Bremsstrahlung only. Assuming a Maxwellian distribution for electrons and a bulk density of states with simple parabolic energy bands, the rate R for light emission ascribed to Bremsstrahlung at an energy E is proportional to27

equation image
1

with kB the Boltzmann constant and Te the electron temperature. Values for Te, obtained by fitting eq 1 to EL spectra, assuming the electron energy distribution to be reproduced by the photon energy distribution, are in good agreement with temperatures of hot electrons in GaAs high-electron-mobility transistors.26

In general, considerably higher EL intensities were observed under reverse bias conditions. Bremsstrahlung corresponding to Te = 2256 K and superimposed b–b recombinations constitute the EL spectra, as shown in Figure Figure44c for such a reverse biased device. For a more detailed analysis of the b–b recombination related EL, Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures with increasing GaAs NC lengths and thus increasing breakdown voltages were investigated. Figure Figure55a shows EL spectra of three NW heterostructures, exemplarily selected out of 30 investigated devices, which all exhibited similar EL characteristics.

Figure 5
EL spectra with designated transition energies. (a) Room temperature EL spectra obtained from NW3, NW5, and NW6 and the respective bias parameters. Vertical lines denote transition energies for the radiative b–b recombinations correlating with ...

Operated under reverse bias conditions (cf. Figure Figure22a), these devices exhibited a broad visible EL extending to the near-infrared. Notably, there is no distinct emission peak that may be assigned to the band gap energy EG = 1.42 eV of GaAs (cf. Figure Figure55b). Under reverse bias, the voltage is supported across the drift region of the Schottky contact. As the moderately doped GaAs NC is embedded between a metallic and a degenerately doped (i.e., highly conducting) Si NW, the maximum electric field, exceeding 2 × 105 V/cm, is supposed to be located in the GaAs NC. At such high electric fields, the conduction band Γ valley population is approaching zero with high populations of the X and L valleys,25 diminishing direct Γ valley transitions (i.e., EL at the GaAs band gap energy).

For EL in the visible spectral range, distinct emission peaks can be observed with the overall maximum shifting to higher energies for longer GaAs NCs, i.e., increasing breakdown voltages (cf. Figure Figure22b). These distinct EL peaks are assigned to hot carrier luminescence26,27,29 with the respective phonon-assisted radiative b–b recombinations as sketched in the GaAs energy band structure in Figure Figure55b. Due to the necessity of energy and momentum conservation, light emission arising from b–b recombinations requires electrons to be scattered from the indirect conduction band valleys to the zone center (k ≈ 0). High phonon density of states are related to a large number of phonon states for a certain energy in the phonon dispersion, i.e., parts of phonon dispersion curves with almost zero slope.30 In the case of GaAs, the phonon dispersion of all kinds of involved phonons exhibit approximately zero slope at the X- and L-symmetry points.31 Thus, a high density of states of phonons with the respective wave vectors are available for scattering electrons to the zone center by emission or absorption of such phonons, resulting in the observed EL maxima. The involvement of split-off band holes in radiative b–b recombinations in GaAs was also observed in photoluminescence studies.32 However, the respective b–b transitions require adequate electron population of the L and X valley, as well as holes in the heavy-hole, light-hole, and split-off band.29 The formation of hot charge carriers in [left angle bracket]111[right angle bracket] oriented GaAs NCs further requires electrons to gain energies higher than the impact ionization threshold (1.8–2 eV)25,33 through scattering events, changing their k-vector.24

The proposed hot charge carrier generation mechanism is sketched in the left panel of Figure Figure33 with electrons tunneling from Ga through the Schottky barrier into the GaAs NC. Under reverse bias, a high electric field is present in the GaAs depletion layer adjacent to the Schottky interface, accelerating charge carriers, which in turn attain energies in excess of the impact ionization threshold. Such hot carriers, instead of transferring energy to phonons, lose energy by elevating valence band electrons to the conduction band and these generated electron–hole pairs themselves generate carrier pairs and the process enters runaway. Simulations of the actual structures confirmed impact ionization and also high yields of holes adjacent to the Ga/GaAs Schottky junction (see Supporting Information 8). Remarkably, with increasing bias voltages, EL emission extends further into the GaAs NC, which is consistent with the impact ionization generation rate simulations.

Radiative recombinations and intraband electron scattering thus result in the characteristic EL spectra with contributions from b–b recombinations and Bremsstrahlung. This confirms the assumed avalanche process with hot electrons injected from Ga into the GaAs NC, generating holes and resulting in the observed EL. Such single-nanowire light emitters yielded external quantum efficiencies of up to EQE = ∫(Psp/Eλ)(e/I) dλ = 8.9 × 10–7, where the emitted spectral power Psp was obtained from integrating the EL spectral power in the wavelength range λ = 400–1000 nm. Eλ is the energy of a photon with wavelength λ, I the applied NW current, and e the elementary charge. However, including the numerical aperture of the spectroscopy system and considering a homogeneously light emitting GaAs segment with a cylindrical shape, this results in a high EL spectral power density of 14.8 mW/cm2.

In conclusion, we demonstrated effective EL from avalanche light-emitting diodes in self-assembled metal/semiconductor NW heterostructures. The axially aligned Si/Ga/GaAs/Si NW heterostructures were achieved via a novel approach, combining VLS NW growth, ion implantation, and millisecond FLA. The visible spectrum of the EL is dominated by hot carrier luminescence due to impact ionization, revealing distinct maxima, which are correlated with GaAs interband transitions. A low broadband exponential component of the EL is ascribed to Bremsstrahlung. A considerable benefit of the presented approach to process heterostructures within Si NWs is the advantageous condition for combining highly mismatched materials, provided by efficient strain relaxation. Recent experiments already supplied evidence for this method to be applicable to other highly mismatched III–V/Si heterostructures, namely, InAs or InGaAs. Furthermore, this unique method is suitable for integrating axial metal segments into Si NWs, by only implanting metal ions. In this study, single NW heterostructures were investigated to gain insight into the fundamental properties of the processed light emitting devices. However, this method could readily be applied to process a large scale device consisting of straight Si NW arrays on bulk Si, allowing to significantly increase device performances due to parallel operation of numerous NW heterostructures.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michael Stöger-Pollach from the USTEM at TU Wien for providing EFTEM analysis of nanowire slices as well as Oskar Baumgartner from Global TCAD Solutions for his support in setting up simulations. We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project No. I 724-N16 and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project No. R01198/14-1 and thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for funding through NCCR-QSIT. We would also like to acknowledge the ITN network “NanoEmbrace”. Furthermore, we thank the interdisciplinary Centre for Electron Microscopy (CIME) at EPFL for access to and training of the electron microscopes. The cleanroom facilities were provided by the Center for Micro- and Nanostructures (ZMNS) at TU Wien.

Glossary

ABBREVIATIONS

EDX
energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
EL
electroluminescence
FLA
flash lamp annealing
HRTEM
high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
LPE
liquid phase epitaxy
NC
nanocrystallite
NW
nanowire
SEM
scanning transmission electron microscopy
TEM
transmission electron microscopy
VB
valence band
VLS
vapor–liquid–solid

Supporting Information Available

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00315.

  • SEM investigations of nanowire response on ion implantation and annealing, thin crystallite formation, detailed Raman and TEM-EDX investigations, experimental determination of Si nanowire doping type, simulations of Si/GaAs/Si barrier heights, hole concentrations, and impact ionization generation rates (PDF)

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

References

  • Yan R.; Gargas D.; Yang P. Nat. Photonics 2009, 310569–576.10.1038/nphoton.2009.184 [Cross Ref]
  • Wallentin J.; Anttu N.; Asoli D.; Huffman M.; Åberg I.; Magnusson M. H.; Siefer G.; Fuss-Kailuweit P.; Dimroth F.; Witzigmann B.; Xu H. Q.; Samuelson L.; Deppert K.; Borgström M. T. Science 2013, 33961231057–1060.10.1126/science.1230969 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bryllert T.; Wernersson L.-E.; Froberg L. E.; Samuelson L. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2006, 275323–325.10.1109/LED.2006.873371 [Cross Ref]
  • Lockwood D. J.; Pavesi L.Silicon Photonics; Topics in Applied Physics; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2004; pp 1–50.
  • Hocevar M.; Immink G.; Verheijen M.; Akopian N.; Zwiller V.; Kouwenhoven L.; Bakkers E. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1266..10.1038/ncomms2277 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Conesa-Boj S.; Dunand S.; Russo-Averchi E.; Heiss M.; Ruffer D.; Wyrsch N.; Ballif C.; Fontcuberta i Morral A. Nanoscale 2013, 5209633–9639.10.1039/c3nr01684f [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Borg M.; Schmid H.; Moselund K. E.; Signorello G.; Gignac L.; Bruley J.; Breslin C.; Das Kanungo P.; Werner P.; Riel H. Nano Lett. 2014, 1441914–1920.10.1021/nl404743j [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Prucnal S.; Glaser M.; Lugstein A.; Bertagnolli E.; Stöger-Pollach M.; Zhou S.; Helm M.; Reichel D.; Rebohle L.; Turek M.; Zuk J.; Skorupa W. Nano Res. 2014, 7121769–1776.10.1007/s12274-014-0536-6 [Cross Ref]
  • Fiory A. T. J. Electron. Mater. 2002, 3110981–987.10.1007/s11664-002-0031-9 [Cross Ref]
  • Wang N.; Cai Y.; Zhang R. Q. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 2008, 601–61–51.10.1016/j.mser.2008.01.001 [Cross Ref]
  • Borschel C.; Niepelt R.; Geburt S.; Gutsche C.; Regolin I.; Prost W.; Tegude F.; Stichtenoth D.; Schwen D.; Ronning C. Small 2009, 5222576–2580.10.1002/smll.200900562 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Borschel C.; Ronning C. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2011, 269192133–2138.10.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.004 [Cross Ref]
  • Johannes A.; Noack S.; Wesch W.; Glaser M.; Lugstein A.; Ronning C. Nano Lett. 2015, 1563800–3807.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00431 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wutzler R.; Rebohle L.; Prucnal S.; Bregolin F. L.; Hübner R.; Voelskow M.; Helm M.; Skorupa W. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 11717175307..10.1063/1.4919775 [Cross Ref]
  • Watt M.; Sotomayor Torres C. M.; Arnot H. E. G.; Beaumont S. P. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1990, 54285–290.10.1088/0268-1242/5/4/001 [Cross Ref]
  • Newman R. C. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1994, 9101749–1762.10.1088/0268-1242/9/10/001 [Cross Ref]
  • Sutter E. A.; Sutter P. W.; Uccelli E.; Fontcuberta i Morral A. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 8419193303..10.1103/PhysRevB.84.193303 [Cross Ref]
  • Schmidt V.; Senz S.; Gösele U. Nano Lett. 2005, 55931–935.10.1021/nl050462g [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sze S. M.; Irvin J. C. Solid-State Electron. 1968, 116599–602.10.1016/0038-1101(68)90012-9 [Cross Ref]
  • Ahn B. H.; Shurtz R. R.; Trussell C. W. J. Appl. Phys. 1971, 42114512–4513.10.1063/1.1659807 [Cross Ref]
  • Spicer W. E.; Liliental-Weber Z.; Weber E.; Newman N.; Kendelewicz T.; Cao R.; McCants C.; Mahowald P.; Miyano K.; Lindau I. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Process. Phenom. 1988, 641245–1251.10.1116/1.584244 [Cross Ref]
  • Ketterer B.; Mikheev E.; Uccelli E.; Fontcuberta i Morral A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 9722223103..10.1063/1.3517254 [Cross Ref]
  • Michaelson H. B. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1978, 22172–80.10.1147/rd.221.0072 [Cross Ref]
  • Shichijo H.; Hess K. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1981, 2384197–4207.10.1103/PhysRevB.23.4197 [Cross Ref]
  • Cavassilas N.; Aniel F.; Fishman G.; Adde R. Solid-State Electron. 2002, 464559–566.10.1016/S0038-1101(01)00221-0 [Cross Ref]
  • Zanoni E.; Manfredi M.; Bigliardi S.; Paccagnella A.; Pisoni P.; Tedesco C.; Canali C. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1992, 3981849–1857.10.1109/16.144674 [Cross Ref]
  • Zappe H. P. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1992, 73391–400.10.1088/0268-1242/7/3/020 [Cross Ref]
  • Adachi S.. Handbook on Physical Properties of Semiconductors; Springer Science & Business Media, 2004; Vol. 2.
  • Onodera K.; Nishimura K.; Furuta T. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1999, 46112170–2177.10.1109/16.796293 [Cross Ref]
  • Kittel C.. Introduction to Solid State Physics; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2005; pp 106–128.
  • Strauch D.; Dorner B. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1990, 261457..10.1088/0953-8984/2/6/006 [Cross Ref]
  • Burr K. C.; Tang C. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74121734–1736.10.1063/1.123671 [Cross Ref]
  • Bude J.; Hess K. J. Appl. Phys. 1992, 7283554–3561.10.1063/1.351434 [Cross Ref]

Articles from ACS AuthorChoice are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society