PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of upsalaLink to Publisher's site
 
Ups J Med Sci. 2016 May; 121(2): 113–119.
Published online 2016 March 24. doi:  10.3109/03009734.2016.1156789
PMCID: PMC4900066

Glucagon secretion from pancreatic α-cells

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes involves a ménage à trois of impaired glucose regulation of pancreatic hormone release: in addition to impaired glucose-induced insulin secretion, the release of the hyperglycaemic hormone glucagon becomes dysregulated; these last-mentioned defects exacerbate the metabolic consequences of hypoinsulinaemia and are compounded further by hypersecretion of somatostatin (which inhibits both insulin and glucagon secretion). Glucagon secretion has been proposed to be regulated by either intrinsic or paracrine mechanisms, but their relative significance and the conditions under which they operate are debated. Importantly, the paracrine and intrinsic modes of regulation are not mutually exclusive; they could operate in parallel to control glucagon secretion. Here we have applied mathematical modelling of α-cell electrical activity as a novel means of dissecting the processes that underlie metabolic regulation of glucagon secretion. Our analyses indicate that basal hypersecretion of somatostatin and/or increased activity of somatostatin receptors may explain the loss of adequate counter-regulation under hypoglycaemic conditions, as well as the physiologically inappropriate stimulation of glucagon secretion during hyperglycaemia seen in diabetic patients. We therefore advocate studying the interaction of the paracrine and intrinsic mechanisms; unifying these processes may give a more complete picture of the regulation of glucagon secretion from α-cells than studying the individual parts.

Keywords: diabetes, electrophysiology, experimental diabetes, glucagon, intrinsic mechanisms, pancreatic alpha-cells, paracrine

Introduction

When Banting and Best (1) injected extracts from pancreatic tissue intravenously or subcutaneously into diabetic dogs and humans, they observed a marked reduction in blood sugar (reflecting the hypoglycaemic action of insulin). However, this was often preceded by a small transient hyperglycaemia, which was initially attributed to epinephrine. A few years later, this phenomenon was suggested to be due to a glucose-mobilizing substance, later named ‘glucagon’ (2). It was another 30 years before the pancreatic α-cells were identified as being the source of glucagon (3), with hypoglycaemia demonstrated as triggering the release of this hormone (4,5).

Glucagon is part of a homeostatic hormonal system developed to protect against serious decreases in blood glucose—glucose ‘counter-regulation’. This mechanism is the combination of processes that act to protect against the development of hypoglycaemia and (should this occur) restore normoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemia suppresses insulin secretion from β-cells and stimulates glucagon secretion from islet α-cells, normalizing blood glucose levels. Even small changes in glucagon can greatly increase blood glucose; the addition of minimal doses of glucagon (0.50 ng/kg/min) is known to induce long-lasting hyperglycaemia (6). Glucagon acts exclusively on the liver, where it stimulates both glycogenolysis (the breakdown of glycogen into glucose) and gluconeogenesis (the formation of new glucose molecules), increasing glucose output within minutes. Under certain conditions, glucagon can also stimulate production of ketone bodies in the liver, which during fasting or prolonged hypoglycaemia may substitute partially for glucose in meeting the brain’s energy needs.

Hormones secreted from pancreatic islet cells play central roles in the whole-body glucose homeostasis. The dysfunction of these endocrine cells contributes to both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (7), with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounting for 90% of the total diabetes incidence (8). T2DM is a major and increasing health problem (9) with a complex aetiology. Both genetic and environmental factors are known to be involved in the disease (10). There is an excessive production of glucose by the liver, which contributes to the fasting hyperglycaemia that is characteristic of this disease. This pathological response is commonly attributed to a combination of insulin resistance and a failure of pancreatic β-cells to release insulin as required (11). However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that impaired glucagon secretion also contributes to the excessive hepatic glucose production in T2DM, exacerbating episodes of hyperglycaemia (12–14). Impaired secretion of glucagon in T2DM shows itself in a two-fold manner: as well as there being too much glucagon secretion during hyperglycaemia, there is also too little glucagon released to normalize hypoglycaemia (15). This compromised physiological and behavioural response to falling blood glucose concentrations is arguably the more fatal arm of impaired glycaemic control in T2DM, with hypoglycaemia being a major cause of mortality in insulin-treated patients (16).

Whereas the mechanisms by which glucose regulates insulin secretion from the β-cells have been well established (17–19), factors regulating glucagon secretion from α-cells in response to glucose belong to the most contested aspects of islet cell biology (20–22). The heart of the question is whether glucagon secretion is regulated by an intrinsic mechanism (within the α-cells) or by factors released from other cells within the islets (paracrine mechanisms). In this review, we summarize the intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms contributing to the glucose control of glucagon secretion in pancreatic α-cells. We also attempt to combine the intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms using mathematical models to address the possible cause of impaired glucagon secretion seen in diabetes.

Paracrine regulation of glucagon secretion

Since glucose stimulates insulin release, and insulin inhibits glucagon secretion, it is inviting to think that inhibition of glucagon secretion from α-cells is secondary to stimulation of the β-cells. A similar argument could be made for somatostatin, the release of which is also stimulated by glucose. The argument that paracrine factors influence glucagon secretion is supported by reports that isolated α-cells (that no longer have paracrine input) are unable to respond appropriately (i.e. decreasing their activity and glucagon secretion) to increased glucose concentrations; in fact, the reports demonstrate that glucose stimulates glucagon secretion when α-cells are removed from their normal paracrine environment (23,24). Insulin was the first paracrine factor from β-cells to provide evidence for this inhibitory action (25). GABA is also released from β-cells (26), and some studies have demonstrated it can inhibit glucagon secretion from α-cells by activation of the GABA(A) receptor (27). Zn2+ (co-released with insulin) has been suggested to have an important role in glucagon secretion (28,29), but this has been questioned (30). Indeed, in mice where the Zn2+ granule transporter is knocked out, there was no alteration in the regulation of glucagon secretion by glucose (31).

Other studies refute the centrality of the control of glucagon secretion by insulin; they demonstrate that single (isolated) α-cells do respond to high glucose by lowering [Ca2+]i and decreasing glucagon secretion (32,33). Furthermore, in 5 mM glucose, glucagon secretion is maximally inhibited in mouse islets—a concentration not associated with any change in insulin secretion (22,34). In fact, insulin actually stimulated glucagon secretion in islets exposed to 6 mM glucose. This may explain the paradoxical stimulation of glucagon secretion that occurs in line with increasing insulin secretion (for glucose concentrations ≥6 mM in mouse islets). Therefore, the inhibition of glucagon secretion in <6 mM glucose is not due to insulin secretion.

Somatostatin (SST) is a potent inhibitor of insulin and glucagon secretion. It has been proposed to be a paracrine regulator of glucagon secretion (35) with an important role for inhibiting glucagon secretion during hyperglycaemia (36). α-Cells in islets express somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) (37). Glucagon secretion is increased in islets in which the SSTR2 is knocked out, highlighting SST as a mediator of the glucose inhibition of glucagon secretion (38).

SST exerts its inhibitory effect at the level of membrane potential and cell exocytosis. Upon binding to the SSTR2, SST activates a G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channel (GIRK), which repolarizes the cell membrane and inhibits the firing of action potentials (39). This effect in membrane potential is transient, probably due to the desensitization of the receptors. SST also inhibits α-cell exocytosis by effectively decreasing the intracellular cAMP level (37,40). With increasing glucose concentrations in the range 0–7 mM, SST release increases in parallel with the decrease in glucagon secretion (22,34). Therefore, it may be argued that inhibition of glucagon secretion is caused by SST signalling. However, glucose retains an inhibitory influence on glucagon secretion in the presence of CYN154806, an SSTR2-specific blocker (34), suggesting that SST does not regulate glucagon secretion (41). Furthermore, a number of different laboratories have demonstrated that blocking the SST signalling pathway in α-cells—either by blocking SST receptors (42) or the associated G-protein cascade (43)—increases glucagon secretion but does not prevent inhibition of glucagon release by glucose. In particular, SST does inhibit glucagon secretion at 0–7 mM glucose, but there is an SST-independent pathway that inhibits glucagon secretion in α-cells.

Taken together, these studies indicate that glucose exerts regulation of glucagon secretion independently of the paracrine factors, via intrinsic mechanisms. Interestingly, the ability of the incretin hormone GLP-1 to inhibit glucagon secretion in the perfused rat pancreas was abolished after immunoneutralization of somatostatin, whilst the effect of glucose was unaffected (44), indicating that the significance of paracrine and intrinsic mechanisms in the control of glucagon secretion is variable.

Intrinsic regulation of glucagon secretion

Pancreatic α-cells, like β-cells, are electrically excitable. At low concentrations of glucose, when the secretion of glucagon is stimulated, α-cells fire continuous overshooting action potentials (APs) (23,27,45). Voltage-gated Na+ channels (Nav channels) and Ca2+ channels contribute to the upstroke of APs (46,47). The discharge of high-voltage APs opens voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) to allow influx of extracellular Ca2+ into the cytosol. This results in an elevation of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and provides Ca2+ signals that trigger glucagon granule exocytosis—a process that makes hormone-containing granules fuse to the cell membrane to release their cargo. Pharmacological studies have confirmed that there are at least four different VGCCs (T, L, N, and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels) expressed in the α-cells (46,48,49). Among them, the P/Q-type Ca2+ channel has been identified as the main VGCC that is involved in glucagon secretion evoked by low glucose despite its relatively low contribution in the transmembrane Ca2+ current (~30%) (46). The L-type Ca2+ channel, although contributing the majority of Ca2+ currents (>50%), plays a minor role in the glucagon secretion under these conditions (50,51). This suggests that there is a tight coupling of the P/Q-type Ca2+ channels and the exocytotic machinery of the α-cells—which is likely to be compartmentalized. Such arrangement avoids the spill-over of Ca2+ from other VGCCs and enables glucagon secretion be regulated by modulation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channel activity.

When the circulating glucose level rises, glucagon secretion is suppressed. This is likely to be via the reduction of P/Q-type Ca2+ channel activity in α-cells. Such inhibitory effect can be achieved by lowering the amplitude or the firing frequency of APs, by influencing membrane depolarization or repolarization, respectively (Figure 1). The change of membrane potential is a result of glucose metabolism or transport (via electrogenic sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 transporters (52) as discussed below), which leads to the alteration of membrane ion conductance. α-Cells are equipped with ATP-sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) of the same molecular identity as in β-cells (46,48,51). Increasing glucose concentrations result in increased glucose metabolism and ATP production, inhibiting the KATP channel. This in turn leads to membrane depolarization (Figure 1A). Consequently, the amplitude of APs reduces due to voltage-dependent inactivation of Nav channels. As a result, APs, although still being generated, cannot reach the voltage that is sufficient to open P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. The result is that secretion of glucagon is reduced.

Figure 1.
The glucose control of glucagon secretion from α-cells via intrinsic mechanisms. (A) KATP channels and SGLT2 depolarize the cell, decreasing action potential height and therefore P/Q activity. This results in reduced glucagon secretion. (B) TASK1 ...

Besides restriction of K+ conductance, membrane depolarization can also be induced by influx of positively charged ions. In α-cells, this can occur at the stage of glucose transport. In addition to glucose transporters (GLUTs), α-cells, in particular in human islets, also express sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) (52). When glucose concentrations are high, SGLT2 transports glucose into the α-cell together with Na+ with a ratio of 1:1 (53). Thus, positive charges can be introduced into cells before glucose undergoes metabolism, which will lead to membrane depolarization. Although there are no direct electrophysiological data about the role of SGLT2 in α-cell membrane potential, it has been reported that blocking it with dapagliflozin could lift the inhibitory effect of glucose on glucagon secretion (52).

The central role of KATP channels and SGLT2 in the suppression of glucagon secretion from α-cells by reducing action potential height (through membrane depolarization) is contested. There are reports that suggest that glucagon secretion is controlled in a different manner: glucose metabolism increases repolarization of the α-cell membrane (reducing its firing frequency, and therefore secretion of glucagon) by either reducing depolarizing cation conductances or enhancing repolarizing K+ conductances (Figure 1B). It has been proposed that α-cell excitability at low glucose concentrations was maintained by a store-operated Ca2+-channel (SOC) (21,22,42,54). In high glucose, ATP generated from glucose metabolism promotes Ca2+ sequestration into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by activating sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). Consequently, the SOC is closed and the cell membrane repolarizes. In addition, the increasing ATP level due to high glucose can also activate a two-pore domain K+ channel—TWIK-related acid-sensitive K+ channel 1 (TASK1 channel), thus providing repolarizing K+ conductance (55). Both mechanisms suggest that a rise of glucose concentration/metabolism leads to the inhibition of intracellular Ca2+ oscillation and thus ceased secretion. These studies were conducted using dispersed single cells that went through mechanical and/or enzymatic dispersing processes. However, most studies on intact islets indicate that the α-cell Ca2+ oscillations persist at high (inhibitory) glucose concentrations (46,56). These divergent results may therefore be a result of isolated/cultured α-cells being different from α-cells in situ in terms of their electrophysiology. For example, Na+ currents are reduced 10-fold in dispersed single α-cells (57) compared to those recorded from intact islets (46).

Combining intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms to understand glucagon secretion

It is important to emphasize that these intrinsic/paracrine mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. However, major uncertainty remains about their relative roles and whether they interact. For example, at a glucose level where glucagon is maximally inhibited (5–7 mM), although little insulin is secreted, somatostatin secretion is already being stimulated (34,42). Thus it may be that both the aforementioned intrinsic and paracrine effects of SST govern the glucose control of glucagon secretion in low glucose (Figure 2). It is interesting to notice that, in the presence of SSTR2-specific blockers, even at a very low concentration of glucose (below the stimulatory level for somatostatin secretion), glucagon secretion is much higher than that measured under control conditions (42,46). Such an observation suggests that glucagon secretion is under tonic inhibition by somatostatin. Indeed, we have observed that 60% (16 out of 27) of α-cells exhibited transient spontaneous repolarizations (possibly due to the activation of GIRK channels by SST; see Figure 3B2 for an example) when sensing 1 mM glucose. The occurrence of such repolarizations only moderately increased (65%; 9 out of 14 cells) when a high concentration of glucose was applied. We have found that although δ-cells are stimulated by glucose, some (<10%) δ-cells are spontaneously active already at low (1 mM) glucose (E. Vergari and P. Rorsman, unpublished observations).

Figure 2.
Combining intrinsic and paracrine regulation of glucagon secretion. See main text for details.
Figure 3.
Mathematical modelling of the involvement of KATP and GIRK channels in the response of α-cells to high glucose. The mathematical model was simulated under conditions of a stepwise increase in KATP (A) and GIRK channel (B) activity, to mimic the ...

Unifying these intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms could provide a more complete picture of the regulation of glucagon secretion in health and disease. A pharmacological and electrophysiological dissection of how these paracrine and intrinsic mechanisms interact to regulate glucagon secretion would be technically challenging. Therefore we resorted to mathematical modelling, a powerful complement to understanding biological systems (58), which provides a useful tool for investigating complex dynamic systems.

Hodgkin–Huxley-like formalisms of the membrane ion channels in α-cells allow the modelling of the α-cell membrane potential. A number of such mathematical models of α-cells have been created and used to study the mechanisms regulating glucagon secretion (59–62).

We investigated whether KATP and GIRK channel activity could explain glucose counter-regulation. We generated a model of the α-cell membrane potential, described by the following differential equation:

equation image
(Eq. 1)

Here we have assumed that the membrane potential dynamics are governed by T-type and L-type calcium currents (lCaT and lCaL), a fast-activating Na+ current (lNa), potassium currents of the delayed rectifying-type (lDR) and A-type (lA), and a passive leak current (lL). We also have currents due to a G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying (lGIRK) and ATP-sensitive potassium channel (lKATP). All equations for these currents are as in Watts and Sherman (59), except lGIRK which is given by:

equation image
(Eq. 2)

Here, gGIRK is the maximal conductance density of the GIRK channel (governed by activation of SSTR2), xlR is a gating variable, VK is the potassium reversal potential, and [Ko] is the extracellular potassium concentration (see Fink et al. (63)). We mimic changes in GIRK and KATP channel activity (driven by changes in glucose concentration) by modulating the maximal conductance densities of the KATP and GIRK channel, gKATP and gGIRK, respectively (Figure 3). We find that decreasing gKATP depolarizes the membrane potential and reduces action potential height, as seen experimentally when α-cells are exposed to high glucose (Figure 3A1,2). When we force the model with gGIRK (to mimic periodic SST release), we see that the model exhibits a spontaneous repolarization, as seen experimentally in a subpopulation of α-cells (that are proximal to δ-cells) in response to high glucose (Figure 3B1,2). The model can therefore explain the different membrane potential responses to high glucose in α-cells.

Glucose control of glucagon release and T2DM

As previously mentioned, insufficient insulin secretion and insulin resistance are exacerbated in T2DM by too much glucagon secretion during hyperglycaemia and too little during hypoglycaemia (64). However, the contribution of KATP channels to impaired regulation of glucagon secretion in T2DM is unclear. It is interesting to note that the inversion of glucagon secretion seen in T2DM can be mimicked in a mouse model with deficient KATP channels (Kir6.2STOP (34)). However, this mouse model revealed that high-glucose stimulation of glucagon secretion must have a KATP-channel-independent mechanism.

It is of great interest that SST receptor antagonists can correct the defective counter-regulation of glucagon secretion observed in diabetic rats (65,66). This is consistent with reports that in diabetes there is an increase in the number of δ-cells (67–70). The resultant hypersecretion of SST may, via binding to SSTR2 and activation of GIRK channels, suppress glucagon secretion. However, this hypothesis remains to be experimentally validated. To mimic this increase in SST release in diabetes, we increased gGIRK in the mathematical model (increased SST release would cause hyperactivation of GIRK channels). We then mimicked exposure to high glucose by decreasing KATP, and the model demonstrated an increase in firing frequency, but no change in action potential firing (Figure 4A). Hence the secretion of glucagon in high glucose would be expected to increase in this situation; the model therefore demonstrates that a combination of overactivity of GIRK and the depolarization due to KATP closure may explain the loss of counter-regulation of glucagon secretion seen in T2DM.

Figure 4.
The interaction of intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms in the regulation of glucagon secretion in T2DM. (A) The mathematical model was simulated under conditions of increased GIRK conductance, to mimic the increased SST seen in diabetes. Under low glucose, ...

Based on these simulation data we therefore propose a mechanism by which impaired counter-regulation of glucagon secretion is generated in T2DM (Figure 4B): In healthy α-cells, GIRK channel activity at low glucose is relatively low (due to low basal SST release) and KATP activity remains sufficiently high to prevent Nav inactivation. As a result, the α-cell fires large-amplitude action potentials, and glucagon secretion is high. When glucose is elevated, KATP channel activity becomes completely inhibited and the resultant membrane depolarization (via inactivation of Nav and reduced action potential amplitude) leads to suppression of glucagon secretion.

In T2DM α-cells, there is a higher K+ conductance due to increased KATP channel activity (46) and hyperactivation of GIRK channels as the consequence of SST over-secretion (as suggested by the ability of SST antagonists to increase glucagon (38,39)). The high resting K+ conductance moves the membrane potential to a state of reduced action potential firing. When such T2DM α-cells are exposed to high glucose, glucose leads to the closure of KATP channels but GIRK channel activity is unaffected, and in these cells the response to glucose is similar to what is seen in β-cells: action potential firing is increased due to the membrane depolarization, but the depolarization is not strong enough to cause a reduction of the action potential height. Therefore, in contrast to the non-diabetic α-cells, increasing glucose results in a stimulation of secretion of glucagon in T2DM. These intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms can, when taken together, explain the impaired regulation of glucagon secretion seen in T2DM.

Conclusions

We have attempted to illustrate the power of combining experimental data with mathematical modelling. It demonstrated, within certain ranges of glucose concentrations, that both intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms can operate in parallel to regulate glucagon secretion from the pancreatic islet α-cells. In particular, the analyses underscore the important physiological role played by intra-islet somatostatin signalling. It should be pointed out that, in this study, we have restricted our analysis to the electrical activity. However, in addition to its ability to inhibit action potential firing (which is only transient), SST also exerts a more sustained inhibitory effect on the exocytotic release of glucagon (39). The amount of glucagon actually being secreted will reflect the combination of the effects on electrical activity and exocytosis. The mathematic model used here provides a powerful tool to investigate the cause of dysregulation of glucagon secretion seen in diabetes.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Banting FG, Best CH, Collip JB, Campbell WR, Fletcher AA. Pancreatic extracts in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J 1922;12:141–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Murlin JR, Clough HD, Gibbs CBF, Stokes AM. Aqueous extracts of the pancreas. 1. Influence on the carbohydrate metabolism of depancreatized animals. J Biol Chem 1923;56:253–96.
3. Sutherland EW, De Duve C. Origin and distribution of the hyperglycemic-glycogenolytic factor of the pancreas. J Biol Chem 1948;175:663–74. [PubMed]
4. Foa PP, Galansino G, Pozza G. Glucagon, a second pancreatic hormone. Recent Prog Horm Res 1957;13:473–503; discussion 503–10. [PubMed]
5. Foa PP, Weinstein HR, Smith JA. Secretion of insulin and of a hyperglycemic substance studied by means of pancreatic-femoral cross-circulation experiments. Am J Physiol 1949;157:197–204. [PubMed]
6. Lins PE, Wajngot A, Adamson U, Vranic M, Efendic S. Minimal increases in glucagon levels enhance glucose production in man with partial hypoinsulinemia. Diabetes 1983;32:633–6. [PubMed]
7. Kahn SE, Zraika S, Utzschneider KM, Hull RL. The beta cell lesion in type 2 diabetes: there has to be a primary functional abnormality. Diabetologia 2009;52:1003–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2009;32(Suppl 1):S62–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Ginter E, Simko V. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, pandemic in 21st century. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012;771:42–50. [PubMed]
10. Murea M, Ma L, Freedman BI. Genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic vascular complications. Rev Diabet Stud 2012;9:6–22. [PubMed]
11. Prentki M, Nolan CJ. Islet beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest 2006;116:1802–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. D'Alessio D. The role of dysregulated glucagon secretion in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011;13(Suppl 1):126–32. [PubMed]
13. Dunning BE, Foley JE, Ahren B. Alpha cell function in health and disease: influence of glucagon-like peptide-1. Diabetologia 2005;48:1700–13. [PubMed]
14. Unger RH, Cherrington AD. Glucagonocentric restructuring of diabetes: a pathophysiologic and therapeutic makeover. J Clin Invest 2012;122:4–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Cryer PE. Glucagon and hyperglycaemia in diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond) 2008;114:589–90. [PubMed]
16. Cryer PE. Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes. Diabetologia 2002;45:937–48. [PubMed]
17. Rorsman P, Renstrom E. Insulin granule dynamics in pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 2003;46:1029–45. [PubMed]
18. Ashcroft FM, Rorsman P. Electrophysiology of the pancreatic beta-cell. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1989;54:87–143. [PubMed]
19. Ashcroft F, Rorsman P. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: not quite exciting enough? Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:R21–31. [PubMed]
20. Gromada J, Franklin I, Wollheim CB. Alpha-cells of the endocrine pancreas: 35 years of research but the enigma remains. Endocr Rev 2007;28:84–116. [PubMed]
21. Gylfe E. Glucose control of glucagon secretion: there is more to it than K-ATP channels. Diabetes 2013;62:1391–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Gylfe E, Gilon P. Glucose regulation of glucagon secretion. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:1–10. [PubMed]
23. Franklin I, Gromada J, Gjinovci A, Theander S, Wollheim CB. Beta-cell secretory products activate alpha-cell ATP-dependent potassium channels to inhibit glucagon release. Diabetes 2005;54:1808–15. [PubMed]
24. Olsen HL, Theander S, Bokvist K, Buschard K, Wollheim CB, Gromada J. Glucose stimulates glucagon release in single rat alpha-cells by mechanisms that mirror the stimulus-secretion coupling in beta-cells. Endocrinology 2005;146:4861–70. [PubMed]
25. Ostenson CG. Regulation of glucagon release: effects of insulin on the pancreatic A2-cell of the guinea pig. Diabetologia 1979;17:325–30. [PubMed]
26. Reetz A, Solimena M, Matteoli M, Folli F, Takei K, De Camilli P. GABA and pancreatic beta-cells: colocalization of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and GABA with synaptic-like microvesicles suggests their role in GABA storage and secretion. EMBO J 1991;10:1275–84. [PubMed]
27. Rorsman P, Berggren PO, Bokvist K, Ericson H, Mohler H, Ostenson CG, et al Glucose-inhibition of glucagon secretion involves activation of GABAA-receptor chloride channels. Nature 1989;341:233–6. [PubMed]
28. Ishihara H, Maechler P, Gjinovci A, Herrera PL, Wollheim CB. Islet beta-cell secretion determines glucagon release from neighbouring alpha-cells. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:330–5. [PubMed]
29. Zhou H, Zhang T, Harmon JS, Bryan J, Robertson RP. Zinc, not insulin, regulates the rat alpha-cell response to hypoglycemia in vivo. Diabetes 2007;56:1107–12. [PubMed]
30. Ravier MA, Rutter GA. Glucose or insulin, but not zinc ions, inhibit glucagon secretion from mouse pancreatic alpha-cells. Diabetes 2005;54:1789–97. [PubMed]
31. Nicolson TJ, Bellomo EA, Wijesekara N, Loder MK, Baldwin JM, Gyulkhandanyan AV, et al Insulin storage and glucose homeostasis in mice null for the granule zinc transporter ZnT8 and studies of the type 2 diabetes-associated variants. Diabetes 2009;58:2070–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Johansson H, Gylfe E, Hellman B. Cyclic AMP raises cytoplasmic calcium in pancreatic alpha 2-cells by mobilizing calcium incorporated in response to glucose. Cell Calcium 1989;10:205–11. [PubMed]
33. Pipeleers DG, Schuit FC, Van Schravendijk CF, Van de Winkel M. Interplay of nutrients and hormones in the regulation of glucagon release. Endocrinology 1985;117:817–23. [PubMed]
34. Walker JN, Ramracheya R, Zhang Q, Johnson PR, Braun M, Rorsman P. Regulation of glucagon secretion by glucose: paracrine, intrinsic or both? Diabetes Obes Metab 2011;13(Suppl 1):95–105. [PubMed]
35. Starke A, Imamura T, Unger RH. Relationship of glucagon suppression by insulin and somatostatin to the ambient glucose concentration. J Clin Invest 1987;79:20–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Klaff LJ, Taborsky GJ. Pancreatic somatostatin is a mediator of glucagon-inhibition by hyperglycemia. Diabetes 1987;36:592–6. [PubMed]
37. Cejvan K, Coy DH, Efendic S. Intra-islet somatostatin regulates glucagon release via type 2 somatostatin receptors in rats. Diabetes 2003;52:1176–81. [PubMed]
38. Strowski MZ, Parmar RM, Blake AD, Schaeffer JM. Somatostatin inhibits insulin and glucagon secretion via two receptor subtypes: an in vitro study of pancreatic islets from somatostatin receptor 2 knockout mice. Endocrinology 2000;141:111–17. [PubMed]
39. Kailey B, van de Bunt M, Cheley S, Johnson PR, MacDonald PE, Gloyn AL, et al SSTR2 is the functionally dominant somatostatin receptor in human pancreatic beta- and alpha-cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2012;303:E1107–16. [PubMed]
40. Elliott AD, Ustione A, Piston DW. Somatostatin and insulin mediate glucose-inhibited glucagon secretion in the pancreatic alpha-cell by lowering cAMP. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2015;308:E130–43. [PubMed]
41. Hauge-Evans AC, King AJ, Carmignac D, Richardson CC, Robinson ICAF, Low MJ, et al Somatostatin secreted by islet delta-cells fulfills multiple roles as a paracrine regulator of islet function. Diabetes 2009;58:403–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Vieira E, Salehi A, Gylfe E. Glucose inhibits glucagon secretion by a direct effect on mouse pancreatic alpha cells. Diabetologia 2007;50:370–9. [PubMed]
43. Cheng-Xue R, Gomez-Ruiz A, Antoine N, Noel LA, Chae HY, Ravier MA, et al Tolbutamide controls glucagon release from mouse islets differently than glucose: involvement of K(ATP) channels from both alpha-cells and delta-cells. Diabetes 2013;62:1612–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. de Heer J, Rasmussen C, Coy DH, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits glucagon secretion via somatostatin (receptor subtype 2) in the perfused rat pancreas. Diabetologia 2008;51:2263–70. [PubMed]
45. Gromada J, Ma X, Hoy M, Bokvist K, Salehi A, Berggren PO, et al ATP-sensitive K + channel-dependent regulation of glucagon release and electrical activity by glucose in wild-type and SUR1-/- mouse alpha-cells. Diabetes 2004;53(Suppl 3):S181–9. [PubMed]
46. Zhang Q, Ramracheya R, Lahmann C, Tarasov A, Bengtsson M, Braha O, et al Role of KATP channels in glucose-regulated glucagon secretion and impaired counterregulation in type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 2013;18:871–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Zhang Q, Chibalina MV, Bengtsson M, Groschner LN, Ramracheya R, Rorsman NJ, et al Na + current properties in islet alpha- and beta-cells reflect cell-specific Scn3a and Scn9a expression. J Physiol 2014;592:4677–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. MacDonald PE, De Marinis YZ, Ramracheya R, Salehi A, Ma XS, Johnson PRV, et al A K-ATP channel-dependent pathway within alpha cells regulates glucagon release from both rodent and human islets of Langerhans. PLoS Biol 2007;5:1236–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. De Marinis YZ, Zhang E, Amisten S, Taneera J, Renstrom E, Rorsman P, et al Enhancement of glucagon secretion in mouse and human pancreatic alpha cells by protein kinase C (PKC) involves intracellular trafficking of PKCalpha and PKCdelta. Diabetologia 2010;53:717–29. [PubMed]
50. De Marinis YZ, Salehi A, Ward CE, Zhang Q, Abdulkader F, Bengtsson M, et al GLP-1 inhibits and adrenaline stimulates glucagon release by differential modulation of N- and L-type Ca2+ channel-dependent exocytosis. Cell Metab 2010;11:543–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Barg S, Galvanovskis J, Gopel SO, Rorsman P, Eliasson L. Tight coupling between electrical activity and exocytosis in mouse glucagon-secreting alpha-cells. Diabetes 2000;49:1500–10. [PubMed]
52. Bonner C, Kerr-Conte J, Gmyr V, Queniat G, Moerman E, Thevenet J, et al Inhibition of the glucose transporter SGLT2 with dapagliflozin in pancreatic alpha cells triggers glucagon secretion. Nat Med 2015;21:512–17. [PubMed]
53. Hummel CS, Lu C, Loo DD, Hirayama BA, Voss AA, Wright EM. Glucose transport by human renal Na+/D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2011;300:C14–21. [PubMed]
54. Liu YJ, Vieira E, Gylfe E. A store-operated mechanism determines the activity of the electrically excitable glucagon-secreting pancreatic alpha-cell. Cell Calcium 2004;35:357–65. [PubMed]
55. Dadi PK, Luo B, Vierra NC, Jacobson DA. TASK-1 potassium channels limit pancreatic alpha-cell calcium influx and glucagon secretion. Mol Endocrinol 2015;29:777–87. [PubMed]
56. Le Marchand SJ, Piston DW. Glucose suppression of glucagon secretion: metabolic and calcium responses from alpha-cells in intact mouse pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 2010;285:14389–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Dai XQ, Spigelman AF, Khan S, Braun M, Manning Fox JE, MacDonald PE. SUMO1 enhances cAMP-dependent exocytosis and glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha-cells. J Physiol 2014;592:3715–26. [PubMed]
58. Epstein JM. Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2008;11:12 https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/Y1zJBRt699ndi5
59. Watts M, Sherman A. Modeling the pancreatic alpha-cell: dual mechanisms of glucose suppression of glucagon secretion. Biophys J 2014;106:741–51. [PubMed]
60. Montefusco F, Pedersen MG. Mathematical modelling of local calcium and regulated exocytosis during inhibition and stimulation of glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha-cells. J Physiol 2015;593:4519–30. [PubMed]
61. Fridlyand LE, Philipson LH. A computational systems analysis of factors regulating alpha cell glucagon secretion. Islets 2012;4:262–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Diderichsen PM, Gopel SO. Modelling the electrical activity of pancreatic alpha-cells based on experimental data from intact mouse islets. J Biol Phys 2006;32:209–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Fink M, Giles WR, Noble D. Contributions of inwardly rectifying K + currents to repolarization assessed using mathematical models of human ventricular myocytes. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006;364:1207–22. [PubMed]
64. Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1902–12. [PubMed]
65. Yue JT, Burdett E, Coy DH, Giacca A, Efendic S, Vranic M. Somatostatin receptor type 2 antagonism improves glucagon and corticosterone counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes 2012;61:197–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Karimian N, Qin T, Liang T, Osundiji M, Huang Y, Teich T, et al Somatostatin receptor type 2 antagonism improves glucagon counterregulation in biobreeding diabetic rats. Diabetes 2013;62:2968–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Rahier J, Goebbels RM, Henquin JC. Cellular composition of the human diabetic pancreas. Diabetologia 1983;24:366–71. [PubMed]
68. Kilimnik G, Zhao B, Jo JH, Periwal V, Witkowski P, Misawa R, et al Altered islet composition and disproportionate loss of large islets in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 2011;6:e27445. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Clark A, Wells CA, Buley ID, Cruickshank JK, Vanhegan RI, Matthews DR, et al. Islet amyloid, increased a-cells, reduced B-Cells and exocrine fibrosis - quantitative changes in the pancreas in type-2 diabetes. Diabetes Res 1988;9:151–9. [PubMed]
70. Brereton MF, Vergari E, Zhang Q, Clark A. Alpha-, delta- and PP-cells: are they the architectural cornerstones of islet structure and co-ordination? J Histochem Cytochem 2015;63:575–91. [PubMed]

Articles from Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis