PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of chromsciLink to Publisher's site
 
J Chromatogr Sci. 2016 May; 54(5): 871–877.
Published online 2016 March 23. doi:  10.1093/chromsci/bmw018
PMCID: PMC4890460

Molecularly Imprinted Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction for the Determination of Triazine Herbicides in Grape Seeds by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Abstract

Molecular imprinting technique, regarded as one of the current state-of-the-art researches, was incorporated with the simple dispersive solid-phase extraction (MI-DSPE) in this work for the extraction of triazine herbicides in grape seeds. The atrazine molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were successfully prepared and characterized by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The imprinting particles were used as the adsorbent in DSPE. Thus, a simple, rapid and selective method based on MIPs coupled with DSPE was established for the simultaneous cleaning-up and quantitative extraction of four triazine herbicides in grape seeds. The experiment parameters, including type of washing solvents, washing time and type of eluting solvents, were investigated and optimized. The performance of the present method was validated by high-performance liquid chromatography. Good linear responses were obtained in concentration range of 0.010–5.0 µg g−1 with correlation coefficients (r2) higher than 0.9993. The recoveries at two spiked levels (1.0 and 2.0 µg g−1) were between 81.2 and 113.0% with relative deviations ranging from 1.2 to 10.7%. The limits of detection were ranged between 0.006 and 0.013 µg g−1, which were lower than the values required by European regulations.

Introduction

Procyanidins (PAs) are a type of polymeric flavan-3-ol compounds. Studies show that the antioxidant activities of PAs are 20 times and 50 times more powerful than vitamin C and vitamin E, respectively (1). Nowadays, PAs are used in human nutriments and preventive medicines for the purpose of scavenging reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (24), modulating immune functions and platelet activation (58) and producing vasorelaxation (9). PAs can be found in large quantities in the extract of grape seeds (10). In order to control the growth of grass and broadleaf weeds in farmland, triazine herbicides are widely used in agriculture around the world (11). However, many studies have shown that triazine herbicides represent potentials for toxic effects on human health (1214). Therefore, many countries have formulated the maximum residue limits (MRLs) of triazine herbicides (1517).

To detect pesticides residual, effective and sensitive analytical methods play an important part. In recent years, many research groups have made extraordinary efforts on developing various methods of sample pretreatment for the determination of triazine herbicides in foods and agricultural products (1822). Most of the developed methods, such as liquid–liquid extraction (23), solid-phase extraction (24), solid-phase microextraction (25), pressurized microwave-assisted extraction (26), dynamic microwave-assisted extraction-solidification of floating organic drop (15), cloud point extraction (27), matrix solid-phase dispersion (28), dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) (29) and pressurized liquid extraction (30), are generally combined with gas chromatography, liquid chromatography (31, 32), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–mass spectrometry (33, 34) for the separation and quantification of triazine herbicides. DSPE, belonging to the “QuEChERS” (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) method, is a relatively new and effective approach to extract trace triazine herbicides from complex matrix. DSPE procedure can be carried out by dispersing the adsorbents in a sample solution. However, the dispersive adsorbents frequently used, including primary secondary amine, octadecylsilane (C18) and graphitized carbon black, are lack of necessary selectivity for triazine herbicides.

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), referring to a type of synthesized materials for molecular recognition, have drawn great attention owing to their importance in wide areas including separation, sensors and catalysis (3537). Comparing with natural recognition materials like antibodies, MIPs are more stable and easy to handle. During sample pretreatment, both matrix compounds and the target analytes are bound onto the atrazine-MIP sorbent. Thus, the ideal washing solvent should disrupt the binding forces between the MIP surface and interfering substances while it should not disrupt the forces binding the analyte to the MIP. That is, for the distribution, coefficient of the interferents toward the MIP should be low, while that of the analyte should be high (38). However, the eluting solvent should disrupt the forces binding the analyte to the MIP. Thus, by using the molecularly imprinting technique, the effect of selection, enrichment and extraction can be obtained.

In this article, atrazine MIPs, synthesized by simple precipitation polymerization, were employed as the dispersive adsorbent of DSPE for the selective extraction of triazine herbicides from grape seeds, followed by the determination of triazine herbicides using HPLC-ultraviolet spectrometry.

Experimental

Reagents and chemicals

HPLC-grade solvents used including methanol and acetonitrile were produced by Fisher Scientific Company (USA). Methacrylic acid (MAA) was purchased from Fuchen Chemical Reagent Company (Tianjin, China). Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) was supplied by Acros (New Jersey, USA). 2,2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was produced by Shanghai Haoshen Chemical Reagent Corp. (Shanghai, China). Four triazine herbicides, including atrazine, atraton, simetryn, prometryn and terbutryn, were obtained from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China). All other reagents used were of analytical grade and were purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, China).

The mixed stock solution of the four triazine herbicides was prepared in acetonitrile at the concentration of each analyte of 50 µg mL−1 and stored at 4°C. And the working solutions of the triazine herbicides employed in the following experiments were freshly prepared by diluting the stock solution with acetonitrile.

Instrumentation

The HPLC system (LC-20ADXR, Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with a SIL-20A automated sample injector, two LC-20AD pumps, a CTO-20A thermostatted column compartment and a SPD-20A UV–Vis detector, was used for triazine herbicides analysis. An eclipse XDB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm particle size, Agilent, USA) was applied to HPLC. An ultrasonic generator (KQ2200E, Kunshan Ultrasonic Instruments, China) and a high-speed centrifuge (HC-2066, Anhui USTC Zonkia Scientific Instruments, China) were employed for the sample pretreatments. A scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU-8020, Hitachi, Japan) was used to obtain the morphology of the MIPs synthesized and the non-imprinted polymer particles (NIPs). A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet Avatar 360, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) was employed to verify the synthesis of MIPs.

Sample preparation

Three kinds of powder of grape seeds cultivated in different regions were purchased from local stores and named as Sample 1, Sample 2 and Sample 3, respectively. Except for the experiments mentioned in “Analysis of real samples,” which were performed with all three samples, all other experiments were carried out with Sample 1. Recovery experiments were performed by spiking Sample 1 with a proper volume of triazine herbicides working solution.

Synthesis of MIPs

The MIPs were synthesized by polymerization reaction according to literature (39). Template atrazine (87.5 mg) and MAA (140 µL) were dissolved in acetonitrile (40 mL) in a round-bottom flask (100 mL). The mixture was shaken with an ultrasonic water bath at room temperature until a clear solution was obtained. The solution was kept for 4 h at room temperature. Then EGDMA (1,780 µL) and AIBN (80 mg) were added into the above solution under sonication. Then the flask was purged with a gentle flow of nitrogen for 10 min and sealed under the nitrogen atmosphere followed by water bath, of which the temperature was gradually increased from room temperature to 60°C in 30 min and kept for 24 h for polymerization reaction. The MIP particles produced were centrifuged at 4,000 r.p.m. and washed by the mixture of methanol and acetic acid (80 : 20, v/v) repeatedly until the template atrazine in the supernatant could not be detected by HPLC-UV. Finally, the obtained MIP particles were dried in the air. The NIPs were synthesized with the same procedure described above, except the addition of template atrazine.

Binding studies

The MIPs and NIPs with the weight ranging from 20 to 130 mg were placed into individual 3 mL polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes followed by the addition of 1 µg mL−1 solutions of atrazine. These mixtures were uniformly dispersed by sonication and then incubated overnight at room temperature. After that, the supernatants were filtered by 0.22 µm filter membranes and analyzed by HPLC-UV.

Morphological characterization

The morphology of the MIPs was observed using a SEM after coating the samples with a thin layer of gold. The IR spectra of MIPs before and after washing off the template atrazine were recorded on a FT-IR spectrometer using KBr pellet in the wavenumber range of 400–4,000 cm−1.

MI-DSPE procedure

About 0.5 g of grape seed powder sample and 3 mL of acetonitrile were added into a 10 mL centrifuge tube followed by shaking for 30 min (40). The mixture was centrifuged at 4,000 r.p.m. for 4 min and the supernatant was transferred to a 4 mL centrifuge tube containing 80 mg of MIPs. The MIPs were dispersed by sonication for 1 min and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 8,000 r.p.m. for 6 min and the supernatant was discarded. The MIPs obtained was washed with 2 mL acetonitrile for 10 min under sonication. The analytes were eluted from the MIPs with 2.5 mL of the mixture of methanol and acetic acid (80 : 20, v/v) by sonication for 10 min twice. The eluents obtained were combined and transferred to a 10 mL glass tube, followed by evaporating to dryness under mild nitrogen stream at 50°C. The residue was redissolved in 150 µL methanol. Finally, the solution was filtered by 0.22 µm filter membrane and analyzed by HPLC-UV. All experiments were performed in triplicate. After the MI-DSPE procedure, the MIPs were dried and recycled.

HPLC analysis

HPLC-grade acetonitrile (A) and deionized water (B) were employed as the mobile phase constituents for gradient elution. A gradient program was carried out as follows: 0–8 min, 80–70% B; 8–18 min, 70–60% B; 18–25 min, 60–55% B; 25–30 min, 55–45% B; 30–40 min, 45–10% B. The temperature of column oven, the flow rate of mobile phase and the volume of sample injection were set at room temperature, 0.8 mL min−1 and 20 µL, respectively.

Results

The molecularly imprinting polymers prepared were successfully incorporated with the simple dispersive solid-phase extraction (MI-DSPE) in this work for the simultaneous cleaning-up and quantitative extraction of triazine herbicides in grape seeds. Major extraction conditions were optimized. Satisfactory extraction recoveries were obtained.

Discussion

Synthesis and characteristics of MIPs

The atrazine MIPs, synthesized by using precipitation polymerization, were in the form of spherical particles. Compared with bulk polymerization, precipitation polymerization avoided grinding and sieving the synthetic polymers. The characteristics and morphologies of the MIPs synthesized were studied by FT-IR and SEM. Figure 1 shows the SEM images of the MIPs synthesized in this work and the reported literature (41). These particles are in the form of near-perfect spheres with the average diameter of 300 nm. Amplification image of MIP synthesized in this work (Figure 1a) exhibits the specific open-framework structure, which was favor of adsorption. The IR spectra of MIPs, NIPs and atrazine are presented in Figure 2. The bands at 3,562 and 3,554 cm−1 of NIPs and MIPs after washing off the template atrazine, respectively, which are assigned to –OH stretching vibration of MAA, are observed red shift (3,430 cm−1) in the spectrum of MIPs before washing off the template atrazine due to the hydrogen-bond interaction between atrazine and MAA. The characteristic band of atrazine at 1,550 cm−1, existed in the spectrum of MIPs before washing off the template atrazine, disappears in the spectrum of MIPs after washing off the template atrazine, indicating that the template atrazine is washed off completely.

Figure 1.
SEM images of the MIPs synthesized in this work (a) and the reported literature (b).
Figure 2.
Infrared spectra of the synthesized particles and atrazine. (a) MIPs after washing off the template atrazine, (b) MIPs before washing off the template atrazine, (c) NIPs and (d) atrazine.

Binding performance of the MIP

Figure 3 shows the results obtained by direct binding experiments of atrazine to the MIPs and NIPs synthesized. As expected, the MIPs bound more atrazine than the NIPs. The binding efficiency increases obviously with the amount of MIPs increasing in the range of 20–100 mg.

Figure 3.
Relative binding percentage of atrazine to MIPs and NIPs.

Optimization of the MI-DSPE conditions

In this study, the spiked grape seed samples at a concentration level of 3 µg g−1 were employed for the optimization of the MI-DSPE conditions. The HPLC peak areas of analytes were used to evaluate the extraction efficiency.

Influence of washing solvents and washing time

Various washing solvents including acetonitrile, dichloromethane, acetone and ethanol were tested. The volume of each washing solvent is set to 4 mL. The experimental results (Figure 4a) indicate that the recoveries of analyte obtained by acetonitrile and dichloromethane are better than that obtained by acetone and ethanol. Considering the environmental fate of dichloromethane (42), acetonitrile was selected as the washing solvent. The extraction efficiencies of analytes for various washing time ranged from 5 to 60 min were examined. The results show that the HPLC peak areas reach the maximum value at the washing time of 10 min (Figure 4b). Thus, 10 min was chosen as the optimum washing time.

Figure 4.
Effect of washing solvents (a) and washing time (b) on extraction.

Influence of eluting solvents

Four milliliters of the mixture of methanol and acetic acid were employed for the elution of analytes. The influences of the proportion of methanol and acetic acid were investigated. As shown in Figure 5, the elution efficiency increases with the increasing of acetic acid proportion of eluents. However, the time of evaporation of eluting solvents increases obviously if the ratio of methanol and acetic acid is <4 : 1. Therefore, the mixture of methanol and acetic acid with the ratio of 4 : 1 was used in following experiments.

Figure 5.
Effect of eluting solvents on extraction.

Evaluation of the method

Linearity, precision, recovery, limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of the present method were investigated by performing a series of experiments under the optimal experimental conditions.

Linearity, LOD and LOQ

Working curves were constructed by plotting the areas of the HPLC peaks versus the concentrations of spiked triazine herbicides in the range of 0.010–5.0 µg g−1. The correlation coefficients (r2) of the working curves are in the range of 0.9993–0.9999, and the LODs and LOQs of the present method, which were considered as the lowest concentration of a certain analyte detected and quantified at the signal-to-noise ratio of 3 and 10, are in the range of 0.006–0.013 and 0.02–0.04 µg g−1, respectively (Table I).

Table I.
Analytical Performances

Recovery and precision

Recovery and precision of the present method were assessed at two spiking levels (1 and 2 µg g−1) in terms of intraday repeatability (n = 3) and interday reproducibility (three consecutive days). The detailed results are listed in Table II. The recoveries of analytes were in the range of 81.2–113.0%. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the intra- and interday analyses were ranged from 1.2–7.8 to 4.9–10.7%, respectively.

Table II.
Recoveries and Precision of the Analytes

Analysis of real samples

Three grape seed samples cultivated in different regions were analyzed by the present method under the optimized MI-DSPE conditions and the results are listed in Table III. The HPLC chromatogram of Sample 1 is shown in Figure 6. In comparison with the sample without pretreatment by MI-DSPE, a considerable decrease in the amount of the matrix interference peaks is observed. The recoveries of four triazine herbicides are in the range of 81.2–113.0% with RSDs between 0.7 and 11.4% for two spiking concentrations (1 and 2 µg g−1), indicating that the present method was suitable for the quantification of triazine herbicides in the complex samples. In order to examine the significance levels of the analytical results, the Student's t-test was performed (43). The results, which are listed in Table III, indicate that the differences between most of the analytical values and the spiked concentrations are not significant.

Table III.
Analytical Results for Grape Seed Samplesa
Figure 6.
Chromatograms of the extracts without MI-DSPE (a) and with MI-DSPE (b) obtained at detection wavelength of 220 nm. 1, Atraton; 2, simetryn; 3, atrazine; 4, prometryn. This figure is available in black and white in print and in color at JCS online.

Conclusion

In this work, MIPs were prepared by simple precipitation polymerization and performed as the dispersive sorbents for MI-DSPE procedure. According to the obtained results, the facility for selective extraction and sample clean-up of the proposed MI-DSPE method were demonstrated. This LODs and LOQs obtained by this work can meet the European Union standards for MRLs of triazine herbicides in grape seed and have a promising application future.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 21405057, 21207047, 21075049 and 21105037) and Scientific Forefront and Interdisciplinary Innovation Project of Jilin University (No. 450060481018).

References

1. Shi J., Yu J., Pohorly E.J., Kakuda Y.; Polyphenolics in grape seeds—biochemistry and functionality; Jounal of Medicinal Food, (2003); 6: 291–299. [PubMed]
2. Arteel G.E., Sies H.; Protection against peroxynitrite by cocoa polyphenol oligomers; FEBS Letters, (1999); 462: 167–170. [PubMed]
3. Ariga T., Hamano M.; Radical scavenging action and its mode in procyanidins B-1 and B-3 from azuki beans to peroxy radicals; Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, (1990); 54: 2499–2504.
4. Hagerman A.E., Riedl K.M., Jones G.A., Sovik K.N., Ritchard N.T., Hartzfeld P.W. et al. ; High molecular weight plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants; Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, (1998); 46: 1887–1892.
5. Mao T.K., Powell J.J., van de Water J., Keen C.L., Schmitz H.H., Gershwin M.E.; The influence of cocoa procyanidins on the transcription of interleukin-2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells; International Journal of Immunotherapy, (1999); 15: 23–29.
6. Rein D., Paglieroni T.G., Wun T., Pearson D.A., Schmitz H.H., Gosselin R. et al. ; Cocoa inhibits platelet activation and function; The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, (2000); 72: 30–35. [PubMed]
7. Packer L., Rimbach G., Virgili F.; Antioxidant activity and biologic properties of a proanthocyanidin-rich extract from Pine (Pinus maritima) bark, Pycnogenol; Free Radical Biology Medicine, (1999); 27: 704. [PubMed]
8. Sanbongi C., Suzuki N., Sakane T.; Polyphenols in chocolate, which have antioxidant activity, modulate immune functions in humans in vitro; Cellular Immunology, (1997); 177: 129–136. [PubMed]
9. Fitzpatrick D.F., Fleming R.C., Bing B., Maggi D.A., O'Malley R.M.; Isolation and characterization of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxing compounds from grape seeds; Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, (2000); 48: 6384–6390. [PubMed]
10. Agarwal C., Veluri R., Kaur M., Chou S., Thompson J., Agarwal R.; Fractionation of high molecular weight tannins in grape seed extract and identification of procyanidin B2-3,3’-di-O-gallate as a major active constituent causing growth inhibition and apoptotic death of DU145 human prostate carcinoma cells; Carcinogenesis, (2007); 28: 1478–1484. [PubMed]
11. Worthing C.R., Walker S.B. (eds.). Pesticide Manual, 7th ed., The Lavenham Press, Lavenham, UK, (1983).
12. Hideji T., Hitomi T., Kazuo H.; Structure-toxicity relationship of monoketones; Toxicology Letters, (1986); 30: 13–17. [PubMed]
13. Graymore M., Stagnitti F., Allinson G.; Impacts of atrazine in aquatic ecosystems; Environment International, (2001); 26: 483–495. [PubMed]
14. Federico C., Motta S., Palmieri C., Pappalardo M., Librando V., Saccone S.; Phenylurea herbicides induce cytogenetic effects in Chinese hamster cell lines; Mutation Research, (2011); 721: 89–94. [PubMed]
15. Wang H., Li G., Zhang Y., Chen H., Zhao Q., Song W. et al. ; Determination of triazine herbicides in cereals using dynamic microwave-assisted extraction with solidification of floating organic drop followed by high-performance liquid chromatography; Journal of Chromatography A, (2012); 1233: 36–43. [PubMed]
16. Li N., Zhang R., Tian L., Ren R.B., Wang Y.Q., Zhang H.Q. et al. ; Extraction of eight triazine and phenylurea herbicides in yogurt by ionic liquid foaming-based solvent floatation; Journal of Chromatography A, (2012); 1222: 22–28. [PubMed]
17. Gao S.Q., You J.Y., Zheng X., Wang Y.R., Ren B., Bai Y.P. et al. ; Determination of phenylurea and triazine herbicides in milk by microwave assisted ionic liquid microextraction high-performance liquid chromatography; Talanta, (2010); 82: 1371–1377. [PubMed]
18. Sánchez-Avila J., Fernandez-Sanjuan M., Vicente J., Lacorte S.; Development of a multi-residue method for the determination of organic micropollutants in water, sediment and mussels using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; Journal of Chromatography A, (2011); 1218: 6799–6811. [PubMed]
19. Cherta L., Beltran J., Portolés T., Hernández F.; Multiclass determination of 66 organic micropollutants in environmental water samples by fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, (2012); 402: 2301–2314. [PubMed]
20. Maldaner L., Jardim I.C.S.F.; Determination of some organic contaminants in water samples by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; Talanta, (2012); 100: 38–44. [PubMed]
21. Dujaković N., Grujić S., Radišić M., Vasiljević T., Laušević M.; Determination of pesticides in surface and ground waters by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry; Analytical Chimica Acta, (2010); 678: 63–72. [PubMed]
22. Camilleri J., Morin N., Miège C., Coquery M., Cren-Olivé C.; Determination of the uptake and release rates of multifamilies of endocrine disruptor compounds on the polar C18 Chemcatcher. Three potential performance reference compounds to monitor polar pollutants in surface water by integrative sampling; Journal of Chromatography A, (2012); 1237: 37–45. [PubMed]
23. Mol H.G.J., Plaza-Bola-nos P., Zomer P., Stolker A.A.M., Mulder P.P.J.; Toward a generic extraction method for simultaneous determination of pesticides, mycotoxins, plant toxins, and veterinary drugs in feed and food matrixes; Analytical Chemistry, (2008); 80: 9450–9459. [PubMed]
24. Carabias M.R., Rodriguez G.E., Dominguez A.J., Hernandez M.J.; Evaluation of surface- and ground-water pollution due to herbicides in agricultural areas of Zamora and Salamanca (Spain); Journal of Chromatography A, (2000); 869: 471–480. [PubMed]
25. Berrada H., Font G., Moltó J.C.; Application of solid-phase microextraction for determining phenylurea herbicides and their homologous anilines from vegetables; Journal of Chromatography A, (2004); 1042: 9–14. [PubMed]
26. You J., Zhang H., Yu A., Xiao Y., Wang Y., Song D.; Determination of triazines in infant nutrient cereal-based foods by pressurized microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; Journal of Chromatography B, (2007); 856: 278–284. [PubMed]
27. Zhou J.H., Chen J.D., Cheng Y.H., Li D.M., Hu F., Li H.X.; Determination of prometryne in water and soil by HPLC-UV using cloud-point extraction; Talanta, (2009); 79: 189–193. [PubMed]
28. Desi E., Kovacs A., Palotai Z., Kende A.; Analysis of dexamethasone and prednisolone residues in bovine milk using matrix solid phase dispersion-liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection; Microchemical Journal, (2008); 89: 77–81.
29. Dagnac T., Garcia C.M., Pulleiro P., Garcia J.C., Llompart M.; Dispersive solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the multi-residue analysis of pesticides in raw bovine milk; Journal of Chromatography A, (2009); 1216: 3702–3709. [PubMed]
30. Brutti M., Blasco C., Pico Y.; Determination of benzoylurea insecticides in food by pressurized liquid extraction and LC-MS; Journal of Separation Science, (2010); 33: 1–10. [PubMed]
31. Bruzzoniti M.C., Sarzanini C., Costantino G., Fungi M.; Determination of herbicides by solid phase extraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in drinking waters; Analytical Chimica Acta, (2006); 578: 241–249. [PubMed]
32. Katsumata H., Kaneco S., Suzuki T., Ohta K.; Determination of atrazine and simazine in water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography after preconcentration with heat-treated diatomaceous earth; Analytical Chimica Acta, (2006); 577: 214–219. [PubMed]
33. Jiang H., Adams C.D., Koffskey W.; Determination of chloro-s-triazines including didealkylatrazine using solid-phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Journal of Chromatography A, (2005); 1064: 219–226. [PubMed]
34. Mou R., Chen M., Cao Z., Zhu Z.; Simultaneous determination of triazine herbicides in rice by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution and high mass accuracy hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometry; Analytical Chimica Acta, (2011); 706: 149–156. [PubMed]
35. Kempe M., Mosbach K.; Direct resolution of naproxen on a non-covalently molecularly imprinted chiral stationary phase; Journal of Chromatography A, (1994); 664: 276–279.
36. Kröger S., Turner A.P.F., Mosbach K., Haupt K.; Imprinted polymer based sensor system for herbicides using differential-pulse voltammetry on screen printed electrodes; Analytical Chemistry, (1999); 71: 3698–3702. [PubMed]
37. Wulff G., Gross T., Schönfeld R.; Enzyme models based on molecularly imprinted polymers with strong esterase activity; Angewandte Chemie International Edition English, (1997); 36: 1962–1964.
38. Tímea P., Viola H., Antal T., George H., Börje S.; Effect of solvents on the selectivity of terbutylazine imprinted polymer sorbents used in solid-phase extraction; Journal of Chromatography A, (2002); 973: 1–12. [PubMed]
39. Cacho C., Turiel E., Martín-Esteban A., Ayala D., Pérez-Conde C.; Semi-covalent imprinted polymer using propazine methacrylate as template molecule for the clean-up of triazines in soil and vegetable samples; Journal of Chromatography A, (2006); 1114: 255–262. [PubMed]
40. Mhaka B., Cukrowska E., Bui B.T.S., Ramstrom O., Haupt K., Tutu H. et al. ; Selective extraction of triazine herbicides from food samples based on a combination of a liquid membrane and molecularly imprinted polymers; Journal of Chromatography A, (2009); 1216: 6796–6801. [PubMed]
41. Dai C.M., Zhang J., Zhang Y.L., Zhou X.F., Duan Y.P., Liu S.G.; Removal of carbamazepine and clofibric acid from water using double templates–molecularly imprinted polymers; Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, (2013); 20: 5492–5501. [PubMed]
42. Rodríguez-González N., González-Castron M.J., Beceiro-González E., Muniategui-Lorenzo S., Prada-Rodríguez D.; Determination of triazine herbicides in seaweeds: Development of a sample preparation method based on matrix solid phase dispersion and solid phase extraction clean-up; Talanta, (2014); 121: 194–198. [PubMed]
43. Zhao X., Xu X., Su R., Zhang H., Wang Z.; An application of new microwave absorption tube in non-polar solvent microwave-assisted extraction of organophosphorus pesticides from fresh vegetable samples; Journal of Chromatography A, (2012); 1229: 6–12. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Chromatographic Science are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press