Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jnnpsycJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 May; 62(5): 478–484.
PMCID: PMC486856

Does routine follow up after head injury help? A randomised controlled trial.


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Medical Disability Society's 1988 recommendation that "every patient attending hospital after a head injury should be registered and offered an outpatient follow up appointment" by determining whether offering a routine follow up service to patients presenting to hospital with a head injury of any severity affects outcome six months later. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial design with masked assessment of outcome. SETTING: A mixed rural and urban health district with a population of about 560000. PATIENTS: 1156 consecutive patients resident in Oxfordshire aged between 16 and 65 years presenting over 13 months to accident and emergency departments or admitted to hospital and diagnosed as having a head injury of any severity, including those with other injuries. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were registered and randomised to one of two groups. Both groups continued to receive the standard service offered by the hospitals. The early follow up group were approached at 7-10 days after injury and offered additional information, advice, support, and further intervention as needed. All randomised patients were approached for follow up assessment six months after injury by independent clinicians blind to their group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validated questionnaires were used to elicit ratings of post-concussion symptoms (the Rivermead postconcussion symptoms questionnaire), and changes in work, relationships, leisure, social, and domestic activities (the Rivermead head injury follow up questionnaire). RESULTS: The two groups were comparable at randomisation. Data was obtained at six months on 226 of 577 "control" patients and 252 of 579 "trial" patients (59% were lost to follow up). There were no significant differences overall between the trial and control groups at follow up, but subgroup analysis of the patients with moderate or severe head injuries (posttraumatic amnesia > or = one hour, or admitted to hospital), showed that those in the early intervention group had significantly fewer difficulties with everyday activities (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the 41% of patients followed up do not support the recommendation of offering a routine follow up to all patients with head injury, but they do suggest that routine follow up is most likely to be beneficial to patients with moderate or severe head injuries. Some of those with less severe injuries do continue to experience difficulties and need access to services. A further trial is under way to test these conclusions.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Jennett B, MacMillan R. Epidemiology of head injury. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 10;282(6258):101–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kraus JF, Nourjah P. The epidemiology of mild, uncomplicated brain injury. J Trauma. 1988 Dec;28(12):1637–1643. [PubMed]
  • Fortuny LA, Briggs M, Newcombe F, Ratcliff G, Thomas C. Measuring the duration of post traumatic amnesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 May;43(5):377–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Leininger BE, Gramling SE, Farrell AD, Kreutzer JS, Peck EA., 3rd Neuropsychological deficits in symptomatic minor head injury patients after concussion and mild concussion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Apr;53(4):293–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Evans RW. The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury. Neurol Clin. 1992 Nov;10(4):815–847. [PubMed]
  • Englander J, Hall K, Stimpson T, Chaffin S. Mild traumatic brain injury in an insured population: subjective complaints and return to employment. Brain Inj. 1992 Mar-Apr;6(2):161–166. [PubMed]
  • Rutherford WH, Merrett JD, McDonald JR. Symptoms at one year following concussion from minor head injuries. Injury. 1979 Feb;10(3):225–230. [PubMed]
  • Middleboe T, Andersen HS, Birket-Smith M, Friis ML. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5–9. [PubMed]
  • Oppenheimer DR. Microscopic lesions in the brain following head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Aug;31(4):299–306. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet. 1974 Sep 14;2(7881):605–609. [PubMed]
  • Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Cumulative effect of concussion. Lancet. 1975 Nov 22;2(7943):995–997. [PubMed]
  • Mandel S. Minor head injury may not be 'minor'. Postgrad Med. 1989 May 1;85(6):213–225. [PubMed]
  • Binder LM. Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986 Aug;8(4):323–346. [PubMed]
  • Dikmen S, McLean A, Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1227–1232. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bohnen N, Twijnstra A, Jolles J. Post-traumatic and emotional symptoms in different subgroups of patients with mild head injury. Brain Inj. 1992 Nov-Dec;6(6):481–487. [PubMed]
  • Greenwood RJ, McMillan TM, Brooks DN, Dunn G, Brock D, Dinsdale S, Murphy LD, Price JR. Effects of case management after severe head injury. BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1199–1205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Minderhoud JM, Boelens ME, Huizenga J, Saan RJ. Treatment of minor head injuries. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1980;82(2):127–140. [PubMed]
  • Relander M, Troupp H, Af Björkesten G. Controlled trial of treatment for cerebral concussion. Br Med J. 1972 Dec 30;4(5843):777–779. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Moss NE, Powers D, Wade DT. The Oxfordshire Head Injury Register. Disabil Rehabil. 1996 Apr;18(4):169–173. [PubMed]
  • King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995 Sep;242(9):587–592. [PubMed]
  • King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT, Caldwell FE. Measurement of post-traumatic amnesia: how reliable is it? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;62(1):38–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. Interventions and service need following mild and moderate head injury: the Oxford Head Injury Service. Clin Rehabil. 1997 Feb;11(1):13–27. [PubMed]
  • Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Wade DT. The Rivermead head injury follow up questionnaire: a study of a new rating scale and other measures to evaluate outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):510–514. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979 Feb;9(1):139–145. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group