Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brheartjLink to Publisher's site
Br Heart J. 1995 December; 74(6): 604–610.
PMCID: PMC484113

Prospective study of patients aged 55 years or less with acute myocardial infarction between 1981 and 1985: outcome 7 years and beyond.


OBJECTIVE--To determine the long-term prognosis of patients after a myocardial infarction (MI) at a young age. DESIGN--Prospective cohort study of patients aged 55 years or less suffering a myocardial infarction. SETTING--A single coronary care unit admitting patients from the community. PATIENTS--255 consecutive patients (210 men) aged 55 years or less admitted between 1981 and 1985 after acute MI. Twenty four patients died in hospital or within 3 months of infarction and 11 were lost to further follow up after discharge. Of the remaining patients, 150 (mean (SD) age 48 (5.7) years) able to exercise 3 weeks after infarction and who agreed to undergo coronary angiography were recruited to a study group and seen 18 months, and 3, 5, and 7 years after MI. In addition, a cross sectional analysis of survival was made to a median of 120 months. Seventy 3 month survivors (mean (SD) age 48 (5.8) years) were not recruited to the study group but were traced for late survival through their general practitioners and family health service associations to a median of 130 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Survival in young patients after MI and the survival of 3 month survivors stratified by their ability to exercise and agreement to undergo angiography. The rate of coronary artery surgery (CAGB) and reinfarction during the first 7 years after index MI in patients recruited to the study group. RESULTS--Sixteen patients (6%) died in hospital and eight (3%) within 3 months of the index infarction. The 7 and 11 year survival rates in the whole cohort of 255 patients were 80% and 66% respectively using life table methods. Survival 7 years after MI, in patients recruited to the study group was better than in those not recruited (93% v 79%, P = 0.001), but thereafter mortality in the study group accelerated and there was no significant difference in survival 11 years after infarction (76% v 67%, P = 0.05). There was a trend towards higher mortality in patients with multivessel disease and severely impaired left ventricular function. During the first 7 years after MI, 38 of 150 patients in the study group underwent CABG and 19 suffered reinfarction, which was fatal in three. CONCLUSION--The medium-term prognosis of young survivors of MI is good, particularly in patients recruited to the study group. After 7 years there is an increase in mortality and the long-term prognosis is less favourable. This should be taken into account when planning future management and follow up of young patients after MI.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Rich MW, Bosner MS, Chung MK, Shen J, McKenzie JP. Is age an independent predictor of early and late mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Am J Med. 1992 Jan;92(1):7–13. [PubMed]
  • Martin CA, Thompson PL, Armstrong BK, Hobbs MS, de Klerk N. Long-term prognosis after recovery from myocardial infarction: a nine year follow-up of the Perth Coronary Register. Circulation. 1983 Nov;68(5):961–969. [PubMed]
  • Sanz G, Castañer A, Betriu A, Magriña J, Roig E, Coll S, Paré JC, Navarro-López F. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 6;306(18):1065–1070. [PubMed]
  • Roubin GS, Harris PJ, Bernstein L, Kelly DT. Coronary anatomy and prognosis after myocardial infarction in patients 60 years of age and younger. Circulation. 1983 Apr;67(4):743–749. [PubMed]
  • Sandler H, Dodge HT. The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1968 Mar;75(3):325–334. [PubMed]
  • Peart I, Odemuyiwa O, Albers C, Hall A, Kelly C, Hall RJ. Exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction: its relation to course and outcome at one year in patients aged less than 55 years. Br Heart J. 1989 Mar;61(3):231–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Odemuyiwa O, Peart I, Albers C, Hall RJ. Exercise testing at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 18 months after infarction and the outcome at 3 years in young patients (under 55 years). Eur Heart J. 1992 Jul;13(7):936–941. [PubMed]
  • Robinson K, Conroy RM, Mulcahy R, Madden B. Relation of infarct site to 15 year prognosis in patients who survived for 28 days after a first myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1988 Dec;60(6):470–473. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Norris RM, Barnaby PF, Brandt PW, Geary GG, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ, Barratt-Boyes BG. Prognosis after recovery from first acute myocardial infarction: determinants of reinfarction and sudden death. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Feb 1;53(4):408–413. [PubMed]
  • Stewart AW, Fraser J, Norris RM, Beaglehole R. Changes in severity of myocardial infarction and three year survival rates after myocardial infarction in Auckland, 1966-7 and 1981-2. BMJ. 1988 Aug 20;297(6647):517–519. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hoit BD, Gilpin EA, Henning H, Maisel AA, Dittrich H, Carlisle J, Ross J., Jr Myocardial infarction in young patients: an analysis by age subsets. Circulation. 1986 Oct;74(4):712–721. [PubMed]
  • Merrilees MA, Scott PJ, Norris RM. Prognosis after myocardial infarction: results of 15 year follow up. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Feb 4;288(6414):356–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roth O, Berki A, Wolff GD. Long range observations in fifty-three young patients with myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Mar;19(3):331–338. [PubMed]
  • Fioretti P, Brower RW, Simoons ML, Bos RJ, Baardman T, Beelen A, Hugenholtz PG. Prediction of mortality during the first year after acute myocardial infarction from clinical variables and stress test at hospital discharge. Am J Cardiol. 1985 May 1;55(11):1313–1318. [PubMed]
  • Stone PH, Raabe DS, Jaffe AS, Gustafson N, Muller JE, Turi ZG, Rutherford JD, Poole WK, Passamani E, Willerson JT, et al. Prognostic significance of location and type of myocardial infarction: independent adverse outcome associated with anterior location. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):453–463. [PubMed]
  • Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS, Davis KB, Kaiser GG, Killip T, Mock MB, Pettinger M, Robertson TL. Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1629–1646. [PubMed]
  • Simoons ML, Vos J, Tijssen JG, Vermeer F, Verheugt FW, Krauss XH, Cats VM. Long-term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 5 year follow-up of a trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Dec;14(7):1609–1615. [PubMed]
  • Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyé LA, Basta L, Brown EJ, Jr, Cuddy TE, Davis BR, Geltman EM, Goldman S, Flaker GC, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 3;327(10):669–677. [PubMed]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group