PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
Molecular Biology Reports
 
Mol Biol Rep. 2016; 43: 381–389.
Published online 2016 March 10. doi:  10.1007/s11033-016-3969-z
PMCID: PMC4831998

Pig fatness in relation to FASN and INSIG2 genes polymorphism and their transcript level

Abstract

Fat content and fatty acid (FA) profile influence meat quality in pigs. These parameters are important for consumers due to their preferences for healthy, high quality meat. The aim of this study was searching for polymorphisms and transcript levels of two positional and functional candidate genes, FASN and INSIG2, encoding proteins which take part in lipid metabolism. The molecular findings were analyzed in relation to fatness traits. Pigs of four commercial breeds were included: Polish Landrace (PL), Polish Large White (PLW), Duroc and Pietrain. DNA sequencing, 5′RACE technique and real time PCR and association analysis were applied. In total, 20 polymorphisms in 5′-flanking, 5′UTR and 3′UTR regions of FASN (12 novel polymorphisms) and INSIG2 (seven novel ones and one known) genes were found. Association study with fatness traits (PL n = 225, PLW n = 179) revealed that four polymorphisms (c.-2908G>A, c.-2335C>T, c.*42_43insCCCCA and c.*264A>G) of the FASN gene were associated with back fat thickness in PL and PLW. Since the polymorphisms were identified in regulatory sequences of the both genes also their transcript levels were studied in PLW (n = 23), PL (n = 22), Pietrain (n = 17) and Duroc (n = 23). The INSIG2 transcript level was positively correlated with monounsaturated FA contents in the longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle. Several correlations were also found between three polymorphisms (c.*264A>G and c.-2335C>T in FASN, and c.-5527C>G in INSIG2) and the FA content. Our study showed that the FASN gene is a promising marker for subcutaneous fat tissue accumulation, while INSIG2 is a promising marker for FA composition.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11033-016-3969-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Pig, Adipose tissue, Fatness, Fatty acids, FASN, INSIG2

Introduction

Fat tissue deposition and fatty acid (FA) composition are important traits influencing pork quality and its dietetic value. Although not much is known on genes or molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic variation of fat deposition in different breeds, the contribution of genetic factors to these traits is relatively high, as the heritability coefficient for such traits as BFT (back fat thickness) or IMF (intramuscular fat content) as well as FA composition oscillates around 0.5 [1]. Thus, their improvement by selection is required for at least two reasons. Firstly, nowadays consumers prefer lean meat; however, a 2.5–3 % IMF content is desired as it confers marbling, which in turn is essential for meat tenderness and juiciness [2]. Secondly, FA composition determines the dietetic value of meat and thus has an impact on consumer health [3, 4].

Candidate genes for porcine fat tissue accumulation and FA composition include FASN and INSIG2, which expression products are involved in lipid metabolism. The former gene encodes FA synthase, an important enzyme that catalyses the biosynthesis of saturated fatty acids (SFA), mainly palmitic acid. The FASN gene was mapped to SSC12p1.5, nearby QTLs for BFT and the back fat FA composition [5]. In turn, the INSIG2 gene encodes a protein which participates in sterol-dependent HMG-CoA reductase degradation and the regulation of SREBP activation [6]. The SREBP transcriptional factor regulates expression of over 30 genes involved in cholesterol and FAs synthesis. Interestingly, one of these genes is FASN [7]. Chromosomal localization on SSC15q12, in the vicinity of QTLs for back and abdominal fat thickness, suggests that INSIG2 is also a positional candidate gene for fatness traits [8].

Since polymorphisms of gene regulatory regions (promoter, 5′UTR and 3′UTR) may affect their transcript level and in consequence may exhibit an association with fat tissue accumulation and FA composition, we aimed to: (1) search for polymorphic variants in the 5′-flanking as well as 5′- and 3′UTR of the porcine FASN and INSIG2 genes, (2) analyze the association of the identified polymorphisms with pig fatness traits, and (3) study the transcript levels of both genes in the longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) and subcutaneous fat (SC) with regard to their correlation with adipose tissue accumulation and FA content.

Materials and methods

Animals

A total of 85 unrelated gilts, representing four breeds: the Polish Large White (PLW, n = 23), Polish Landrace (PL, n = 22), Pietrain (n = 17) and Duroc (n = 23), were analyzed in order to search for polymorphism and to determine transcript levels of the FASN and INSIG2 genes. Furthermore, for these animals data concerning FA content in LTL and SC, measured by gas chromatography and reported elsewhere [9], were used. The associations between selected polymorphisms and production traits were calculated for PLW (n = 179) and PL (n = 225) gilts. All animals were kept under identical conditions in a local Pig Testing Station (Pawlowice, Poland), fed ad libitum, slaughtered at 100 kg of body weight and dissected. The study was approved by the Local Ethical Commission for Research on Animals in Poznan (Poland).

DNA sequencing and genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples using the Blood Mini Isolation Kit (A&A Biotechnology). In total 8 primer pairs, 4 for each gene, were designed in the Primer3 tool (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). Primer sequences, their annealing temperatures and amplicon lengths as well as localizations are listed in Supplementary Table 1. To screen for polymorphisms direct sequencing was applied. Amplicons, after exonuclease and alkaline phosphatase treatment, were sequenced with the use of the BigDay Terminator Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems), followed by purification on a Sephadex G-50 (Sigma Aldrich) and analysis by capillary electrophoresis on a 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Genotyping for association analysis was performed by direct sequencing (FASN, c.*42_43insCCCCA and INSIG2, c.*423G>A) or by RFLP with the use of the following endonucleases: AlwNI (FASN, c.-2908G>A), SmaI (FASN, c.-2335C>T), BsrBI (FASN, c.*264A>G), HaeIII (INSIG2, c.-5527C>G). The Haploview software (http://www.broadinstitute.org/scientific-community/science/programs/medical-and-population-genetics/haploview/haploview) was used to estimate haplotype frequencies, TESS (http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/cgi-bin/tess/tess) and P-Match 1.0 Public (http://www.gene-regulation.com/cgi-bin/pub/programs/patch/bin/patch.cgi) softwares were applied to search for potential transcription binding sites in the 5′-flanking regions and EMBOSS Cpglot (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/seqstats/emboss_cpgplot/) was used in prediction of CpG islands. Polymorphisms within 3′UTR were analyzed with TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/) in order to determine whether they are localized within a potential target sequence for miRNA.

Transcript level

To perform the amplification of cDNA 5′ ends a FirstChoice RLM-RACE Kit (Ambion) was used, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was isolated from SC of PL pigs. Primers used for 5′RACE are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Total RNA was extracted from the LTL and SC using the TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics). The RNA quantity and quality were assessed in a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Subsequently to reverse transcription of approximately 2.5 µg RNA with random hexamers and oligodT (Roche), the real-time PCR analysis was performed in duplicate on the LightCycler2.0 analyzer (Roche). For fluorescence monitoring SYBR Green I (Roche) was used. The specificity of the amplified fragments was confirmed based on the melting curve and product length analysis. The standard curve for each gene (FASN and INSIG2, as well as reference genes: ACTB and PPIA) was designed as a series of tenfold dilutions of the purified PCR product. In each real-time PCR analysis standards of studied and reference genes were included. The relative abundance of FASN and INSIG2 transcripts was normalized to a geometric mean of the two reference genes (ACTB and PPIA), as it was proposed by Vandesompele et al. [10]. All primer pairs (Supplementary Table 1) for this reaction covered 2 neighboring exons, in order to facilitate detection of potential genomic DNA contamination.

Statistics analysis

The association analysis between FASN and INSIG2 gene polymorphisms and fatness traits was conducted with a linear mixed model for each breed separately. The statistical model was as follows:

yijklμsigjrkβ1xlβ2zleijkl

where yijkl is the trait observed for gilt ijkl, µ is the overall mean; si is the random effect of sire; gj is the fixed effect of polymorphism under study; rk is the fixed effect of genotype at the RYR1 locus (two levels: CC and CT at position 1843); β1 and β2 are fixed coefficients of regression, xk and zk are the age at slaughter and right half-carcass weight, respectively; and eijkl is the residual effect.

Due to the low frequencies of some genotypes, namely: TT (c.-2335C>T) in PLW and PL, AA (c.-2908G>A) in PL, GG (c.-5527C>G) in PL and AA (c.*423G>A) in PLW, they were excluded from genotype-phenotype association studies.

In case of FASN gene we also considered an association between fatness traits and haplotypes (c.-2908G>A and c.-2335CT for PL; c.-2908G>A, c.-2335CT and c.*42_43insCCCCA for PLW). We regressed phenotype on haplotype content (0, 1 and 2). When for a gilt the haplotypes could not be fully determined we selected variants with highest population frequencies as estimated by HaploView program. Additive effects of haplotypes were estimated simultaneously by imposing a restriction for their sum to be 0. The statistical model was similar to that described above, except that the effect of genotype was replaced by covariates for the haplotype contents.

Analyses were performed for 12 fatness traits (BFT measured at seven points, IMF, abdominal fat weight, percentage of lean meat in carcass, back fat of ham with skin weight, back fat of loin with skin weight). All statistical calculations were performed using the R software v3.2.0 (R Development Core Team).

Correlations between FASN and INSIG2 transcript levels and FA contents as well as fatness traits were calculated. Due to the skewness of transcript levels the logarithm transformation was applied, followed by the outlier removal (values 2 SD above or below the mean trait value were excluded). To account for the breed effect the correlation was calculated from residuals after application of a fixed linear model with the breed effect included.

The U Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were applied to compare mean levels of transcripts and FAs depending on the polymorphic variants.

Results and discussion

FASN and INSIG2 polymorphisms

Altogether 2127 bp of the FASN gene, including 1730 bp of the 5′-flanking sequence and 5′UTR, and 397 bp of 3′UTR were obtained. Using the 5′RACE technique we identified the transcription start site (TSS), expressed in SC, as well as additional 85 bp at the 5′ end of the transcript compared to the sequence deposited in the NCBI GenBank (NM_001099930). In the obtained sequence upstream of TSS all characteristic motifs (TATA-box, SRE/E-box, Sp1-binding GC box, NF-Y binding box) for the FASN gene promoter were present (Fig. 1) [11]. Comparison of this sequence (200 bp above TSS) revealed a high level of its similarity (around 90 %) between four species: pig, human, rat and cattle.

Fig. 1
Comparison of 200 bp of the FASN gene promoter sequence in four species

Altogether, 12 novel polymorphic sites in the FASN gene were found, including 10 in the 5′-flanking region (c.-3220C>T, c.-3023C>T, c.-2943A>C, c.-2908G>A, c.-2863G>A, c.-2649T>C, c.-2631G>T, c.-2392T>G, c.-2335C>T and c.-2333_2334insG) and 2 in 3′UTR (c.*42_43insCCCCA and c.*264A>G). Among them one (c.-3023C>T) was absent in Duroc pigs, whereas the indel (c.*42_43insCCCCA) was present in PLW only (Supplementary Table 2). To our knowledge in the pig FASN gene other 10 SNPs, located within the coding sequence (c.196C>T, c.265C>T, c.508T>C, c.826C>T, c.1254A>G, c.2236G>T, c.3082G>A, c.3189T>C, c.5008C>T and c.6545A>C), were reported earlier and three of them altered the amino acids sequence: c.1254A>G (Arg>Gln), c.3189T>C (Thr>Ile), c.6545A>C (His->Asn) [12]. Moreover, they co-segregated as two haplotypes (c.[1254A; 3189T; 6545A] and c.[1254G; 3189C; 6545C]) in the Landrace breed. In 2014 Molnar et al. found in Mangalica and Duroc breeds another two missense SNPs in this gene [13]. One of them was located in exon 9 (G>A, position 1,028,766) and caused amino acid substitution (R443Q), while the second one (C>T in exon21, position 1,025,096) resulted in a T1088I change.

The in silico analysis of the detected polymorphisms in the 5′flanking sequence indicated that some of them (c.-2335C>T, c.-2392T>G, c.-2649T>C, c.-2908G>A, c.-2943A>C and c.-3220C>T) may affect the binding probability of the transcription factors. For example, c.-2335C>T polymorphism occurs within a consensus sequence for the Sp1 transcription factor, while the c.-2943A>C polymorphism is found within a target sequence for the NF-1 transcription factor. Interestingly, all identified polymorphisms in the 5′-flanking region are located within a potential CpG island. On the other hand, the two polymorphic sites in 3′UTR occurred outside potential target sequences for microRNA molecules.

Sequence analysis of the 2462 bp of the INSIG2 gene, comprising 1270 bp of the 5′-flanking region and 5′UTR, as well as 1192 bp of 3′UTR, revealed 8 polymorphisms. They were found in the 5′-flanking region (c.-5616G>T, c.-5603T>C, c.-5527C>G), 5′UTR (c.-5271G>A) and 3′UTR (c.*423G>A, c.*463C>T, c.*725T>C, c.*793A>C). Among them three (c.-5616G>T, c.-5603T>C and c.-5271G>A) were specific to the Duroc breed, while in the lean Pietrain breed only one SNP (c.*423G>A) was observed (Supplementary Table 2). One SNP (c.-5616G>T) and another 4 polymorphic sites in the promoter and 3′UTR (c.-212-669T>C, c.-212-84G>C, c.*121_122delGT and c.*442A>G) were previously reported in the Ph.D. thesis of Pertek [14]. These four polymorphisms were not found in our study, possibly due to a low minor allele frequency (MAF) or their specificity to the Mangalica breed, since they were detected in Mangalica x Pietrain crossbred pigs.

Two SNPs, c.-5603T>C and c.-5527C>G, alter the putative transcription factor binding sites. The first SNP is located within the sequences recognized by NF-1 and c-Ets-1, whereas the other—within sequences for the AP-1 and Sp1 transcription factors. Similarly to FASN gene polymorphisms, none of the INSIG2 polymorphic sites affected the conserved target sequences for microRNA molecules.

Associations between FASN and INSIG2 polymorphisms and fatness traits

On the basis of two criteria, namely location within the potential regulatory element sequence and the relatively even distribution of alleles, 4 polymorphisms in the FASN gene (c.-2335C>T, c.-2908G>A, c.*264A>G for PL and PLW; and c.*42_43insCCCCA for PLW only) and 2 SNPs in the INSIG2 gene (c.-5527C>G for PL only and c.*423G>A for PLW only) were selected for the association studies.

The following genotype frequencies at the FASN locus were calculated: (1) at c.-2335C>T: 0.57 (CC), 0.39 (CT), 0.04 (TT) in PL, and 0.73, 0.25, 0.02 in PLW; (2) at c.-2908G>A: 0.44 (GG), 0.50 (GA), 0.06 (AA) in PL, and 0.29, 0.53, 0.18 in PLW; (3) at c.*264A>G: 0.32 (AA), 0.60 (AG), 0.08 (GG) in PL, and 0.28, 0.50, 0.22 in PLW, and (4) at c.*42_43insCCCCA: 0.84 (del/del) and 0.16 (ins/del) in PLW. The Chi square test revealed deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg proportion in PL for c.-2908G>A (FASN) and c.*264A>G (FASN).

With regard to INSIG2 polymorphism we observed a distinct differences between PL and PLW breeds. At c.-5527C>G site a quite wide distribution of polymorphic variants was observed in PL and the genotype frequencies were as follows: CC (0.59), CG (0.37) and GG (0.04), while in PLW this site was almost monomorphic. A reverse situation was observed at c.*423G>A, which was polymorphic in PLW—genotype frequencies were: 0.70 (GG), 0.26 (GA) and 0.04 (AA), but almost monomorphic in PL. The association analysis did not reveal significant (p > 0.05) associations between the analyzed polymorphisms and fatness traits.

The association analyses revealed a number of statistically significant multiple associations with fatness traits for four polymorphisms in the FASN gene (Table 1). Interestingly, all analyzed polymorphisms were associated with adipose tissue accumulation, mainly with back fat thickness. For instance, in the GG homozygotes (c.*264A>G in FASN gene) higher values of BFT over the back and BFT at sacrum point III were found. In turn, deletion of c.*42_43insCCCCA (FASN) was associated with a lower BFT over back and a lower back fat of ham with skin weight. We observed a high correlation between c.-2908G>A and c.*264A>G (linkage disequilibrium R2 = 0.98), therefore we believe these two markers capture the same phenotypic effect on BFT. A synonymous mutation in exon 4 (c.265C>T) was tested by Renaville et al. [15]. No effect on BFT was observed, but an association with weight loss during salting in four hybrids was found. The search for an association between FASN gene polymorphisms and pork fatness traits was also carried out by Kim et al. [16]. They reported an association between c.6545A>C and IMF content in Korean native x Yorkshire crossbred pigs. Taking into consideration the detected associations, as well as the chromosomal localization of the FASN on SSC12 nearby QTLs for BFT and the back fat FA composition, it might be suggested that a functional polymorphism, exerting a significant phenotypic impact on BFT, may occurs within or in the vicinity of the FASN gene.

Table 1
Associations between FASN polymorphisms and pig fatness traits—the marginal means with standard errors and p value for the polymorphism effect

In the case of the porcine INSIG2 the association between the heterozygous genotype at c.*121_122delGT and a higher BFT in Mangalica x Pietrain crossbred pigs was mentioned by Pertek [14]. In our study we found no significant (p > 0.05) associations between the analyzed INSIG2 gene polymorphisms and fatness traits, thus only above mentioned four FASN gene polymorphisms may be used as molecular markers for pig BFT.

Transcript levels of FASN and INSIG2 genes

The mean abundance of FASN and INSIG2 transcript levels was examined in the longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) muscle and SC tissue. In general, the level of FASN mRNA in SC was the highest in PL and the lowest in Duroc pigs (Fig. 2). A similar relationship was observed also for other genes involved in lipid metabolism, i.e. ME, SCD and ACACA, which transcript levels were elevated in the SC of PL pigs when compared to other analyzed breeds [1719]. Interestingly, Miao et al. [20] claimed that the FASN transcript was more abundant in SC of Jinhua pigs (a fat Chinese breed) than in the Landrace pigs (a leaner breed). Furthermore, considering that gilts in our study were kept under identical conditions and slaughtered at the same body weight, one may conclude of a significant genetic impact on observed differences between breeds. We detected no FASN transcripts in LTL and we assumed that it was due to the lack or a very low level of its expression in this tissue. A similar result was reported by Ding et al. [21], who also did not detect the FASN transcripts in the muscle of Newsham and Duroc pigs. It should be mentioned, that in pigs FAs are synthesized mainly in adipose tissue [22]. However, Yu et al. [23] showed that the FASN transcript was present in LTL of Lantang and Landrace pigs. This discrepancy may be caused by changes in transcript levels during postnatal development, as it was suggested by Duran-Montgé et al. [24]. The authors showed that the expression of some genes related to lipid metabolism, including FASN, decline with animal weight and in pigs at a 100-kg body weight the FASN mRNA abundance in muscle was only 1/4 of the transcript level of pigs at 60 kg.

Fig. 2
The mean abundance of FASN and INSIG2 transcript levels in subcutaneous fat tissue (SC) and the longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) muscle. PL Polish Landrace, PLW Polish Large White, PIE Pietrain, DUR Duroc

We also analyzed a relationship between c.-2335C>T polymorphism, occurring in a consensus sequence for the SP1 transcription factor, and the transcript level of FASN in Duroc pigs. The abundance of the transcript in SC was higher (p = 0.041) in CT pigs when compared to the CC ones. Unfortunately, due to an uneven distribution of the variants we could not test the effect of the TT genotype. Nonetheless this result is surprising, since this polymorphism disrupts a putative binding site for the SP1 transcription factor, so one could assume that the effect would be opposite, e.g. lower transcript level. It can be speculated that other mechanisms may affect the transcript level, e.g. methylation pattern, since this SNP occurs within a predicted CpG island.

With regard to the INSIG2 gene we observed breed- and tissue-specific transcript level variability, as well as a positive correlation between the INSIG2 mRNA levels in SC and LTL tissues (r = 0.50, p < 0.0001). In PLW the mRNA abundance in SC was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than in LTL. For other breeds this tendency was similar, although not statistically significant. Moreover, the INSIG2 transcript level in SC of PLW was higher in comparison to PL, Duroc and Pietrain (Fig. 2). Also results obtained by Yingkai et al. [25] indicated a 1.3× higher level of the INSIG2 transcript in adipose tissue in fat Rongchang pigs than in leaner Landrace. Thus it could be expected, that we should observe the lowest INSIG2 transcript level in the leanest (in terms of BFT and AF (abdominal fat) values) breed among included in our study, i.e. in Pietrain [9]. However no such correlation was detected, what may suggest, that INSIG2 transcript level depends also on other factors than breed (lean or fat) and tissue type.

It should also be stressed that we found a negative correlation (r = −0.25, p = 0.032) between transcript levels of FASN and INSIG2 in SC. This result is consistent with the findings of Takaishi et al. [7], who reported that the INSIG2 overexpression leads to a reduction in mRNA level of ACC, FASN, SCD and GPAT. It is also in agreement with INSIG2 biological function, which is regulation of cholesterol homeostasis through binding/releasing mechanism of SCAP/SREBP complex in the endoplasmic reticulum, and thus blocking or enabling SREBP proteolytic activation and action as a factor regulating among others FASN gene transcription [6].

FASN and INSIG2 polymorphisms and transcript levels in relation to fatty acid composition

The importance of meat FAs profile stems mainly from two reasons. On the one hand meat, as a substantial source of FA in the diet, needs to answer consumers requirements of healthy meat, i.e. higher PUFA to SFA ratio and more optimal balance of n-6 to n-3 PUFA [2]. On the other hand, FA composition influences significantly firmness and softness of the meat fat, determining its processing.

Since both studied genes encode proteins playing crucial roles in lipid metabolism, we analyzed an association of their transcript level and polymorphisms with FA composition. At first, we found that the FASN gene transcript level in SC was negatively correlated with the C20:2 concentration (r = −0.24, p = 0.048), while with regard to INSIG2 the correlation concerned C18:2 in SC (r = 0.23, p = 0.046) and MUFA (r = 0.33, p = 0.003), C16:1 (r = 0.24, p = 0.035) and C18:1 n9 (r = 0.35, p = 0.002) in LTL. Furthermore, two FASN (c.-2335C>T and c.*264A>G) and one INSIG2 (c.-5527C>G) polymorphisms showed several breed- and tissue-specific associations with FA composition in SC and LTL tissues. The INSIG2 polymorphism was associated with the SFA content in LTL tissue of the PL breed and MUFA content in LTL tissue of the PLW breed, while the FASN polymorphism (c.-2335C>T) was associated with PUFA content in SC tissue of the Pietrain breed. The increase of FA unsaturation, however desirable from consumer point of view, may lead to technological difficulties in meat processing, in contrast to higher percentage of SFA, which is more favorable during meat transformation [26]. Associations were also observed for specific FA in different breeds and tissues (Table 2). However, due to a limited number of animals, these results should be considered as preliminary suggestions.

Table 2
Association of three polymorphisms in the FASN and INSIG2 genes with fatty acid composition

In pigs several associations between FASN nucleotide substitutions and FA content were documented. Muñoz et al. [12] found that allele A (c.1254A>G) is positively correlated with the lower C20:1(n-9) content in back fat of the Landrace breed. Kim et al. [16] reported higher levels of C16:1 and C18:1 in Korean native pigs crossed with Yorkshire pigs, with the CC or CT genotype (c.265C>T) and AA or AC (c.6545A>C) in comparison to the TT and CC genotypes, respectively. The effect of c.265C>T polymorphism (exon 4) was also analyzed by Maharani et al. [27], who confirmed a higher proportion of C16:1, C18:1 and MUFA and lower contents of PUFA, including C18:2 and C18:3, in Duroc heterozygotes than in CC homozygotes. Our study also indicates that two polymorphisms (c.-2335C>T and c.*264A>G) of this gene are associated with the FA composition in back fat and longissimus thoracis et lumborum tissues.

Associations of INSIG2 polymorphism with the FA contents were also reported. A higher SFA concentration and a decreased PUFA level in IMF of heterozygotes (c.*121_122delGT polymorphism) of Mangalica x Pietrain pigs was described by Pertek [14]. We observed higher C18:2 level of PL gilts with the CC (c.-5527C>G) genotype. It should be stressed, that C18:2 (linoleic acid) is a main factor of fat tissue firmness [2]. With the increase of C18:2 percentage the lowering of melting point is observed, which leads to worse fat firmness (soft fat), causing technological difficulties in the meat processing: cutting, grinding and slicing [26]. As it was showed by Suzuki et al. [28] the heritability of C18:2 in outer and inner SC tissue is quite high (0.44 and 0.32 respectively), suggesting that FA content is significantly controlled by genetic factors.

Conclusion

Among 20 polymorphisms identified in regulatory sequences, mainly in 5′-flanking regions, of the FASN and INSIG2 genes 3 SNPs and 1 indel in FASN gene (c.-2908G>A, c.-2335C>T, c.*42_43insCCCCA and c.*264A>G) were associated with back fat thickness. Moreover, the transcription profile of the analyzed genes was breed- (for both genes) and tissue-specific (for INSIG2), as well as correlated with the content of several FAs. Thus, we conclude that FASN is an interesting candidate gene for SC tissue accumulation, while INSIG2 for the FA profile in the studied tissues.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Grant Number: N311 288936). The first author received a fellowship from the European Social Fund (EU) – Priority 8.2.

References

1. Switonski M, Stachowiak M, Cieslak J, Bartz M, Grzes M. Genetics of fat tissue accumulation in pigs: a comparative approach. J Appl Genet. 2010;51:153–168. doi: 10.1007/BF03195724. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, et al. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 2008;78:343–358. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Ntawubizi M, Colman E, Janssens S, Raes K, Buys N, De Smet S. Genetic parameters for intramuscular fatty acid composition and metabolism in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:1286–1294. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2355. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Sellier P, Maignel L, Bidanel JP. Genetic parameters for tissue and fatty acid composition of backfat, perirenal fat and longissimus muscle in Large White and Landrace pigs. Animal. 2010;4:497–504. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109991261. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Muñoz G, Ovilo C, Noguera JL, Sánchez A, Rodríguez C, Silió L. Assignment of the fatty acid synthase (FASN) gene to pig chromosome 12 by physical and linkage mapping. Anim Genet. 2003;34:234–235. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.00987.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Yabe D, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Insig-2, a second endoplasmic reticulum protein that binds SCAP and blocks export of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12753–12758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162488899. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Takaishi K, Duplomb L, Wang M-Y, Li J, Unger RH. Hepatic insig-1 or -2 overexpression reduces lipogenesis in obese Zucker diabetic fatty rats and in fasted/refed normal rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:7106–7111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401715101. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Nowacka-Woszuk J, Szczerbal I, Fijak-Nowak H, Switonski M. Chromosomal localization of 13 candidate genes for human obesity in the pig genome. J Appl Genet. 2008;49:373–377. doi: 10.1007/BF03195636. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Klensporf-Pawlik D, Szydlowski M, Kaczmarek A, Nowacka-Woszuk J, Switonski M, Jelen H. The fatty acid composition of the Longissimus dorsi muscle, subcutaneous and visceral fats differ in four commercial pig breeds. J Anim Feed Sci. 2012;21:661–676.
10. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:research0034–research0034.11. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Choi W-I, Jeon B-N, Park H, Yoo J-Y, Kim Y-S, Koh D-I, et al. Proto-oncogene FBI-1 (Pokemon) and SREBP-1 synergistically activate transcription of fatty-acid synthase gene (FASN) J Biol Chem. 2008;283:29341–29354. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802477200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Muñoz G, Alves E, Fernández A, Ovilo C, Barragán C, Estell J, et al. QTL detection on porcine chromosome 12 for fatty-acid composition and association analyses of the fatty acid synthase, gastric inhibitory polypeptide and acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha genes. Anim Genet. 2007;38:639–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01668.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Molnár J, Nagy T, Stéger V, Tóth G, Marincs F, Barta E. Genome sequencing and analysis of Mangalica, a fatty local pig of Hungary. BMC Genom. 2014;15:761. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-761. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Pertek A (2011) QTL and candidate gene analysis of energy and lipid metabolism in swine. Dissertation, Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Tierzucht
15. Renaville B, Bacciu N, Lanzoni M, Corazzin M, Piasentier E. Polymorphism of fat metabolism genes as candidate markers for meat quality and production traits in heavy pigs. Meat Sci. 2015;110:220–223. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.07.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Kim S-W, Choi Y-I, Choi J-S, Kim J-J, Choi B-H, Kim T-H, Kim K-S. Porcine fatty acid synthase gene polymorphisms are associated with meat quality and fatty acid composition. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2011;31:356–365. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2011.31.3.356. [Cross Ref]
17. Bartz M, Szydlowski M, Kociucka B, Salamon S, Jelen HH, Switonski M. Transcript abundance of the pig stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene has no effect on fatty acid composition in muscle and fat tissues, but its polymorphism within the putative microRNA target site is associated with daily body weight gain and feed conversion ratio. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(1):10–19. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5380. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Bartz M, Kociucka B, Mankowska M, Switonski M, Szydlowski M. Transcript level of the porcine ME1 gene is affected by SNP in its 3′UTR, which is also associated with subcutaneous fat thickness. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013;131:271–278. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12065. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Stachowiak M, Nowacka-Woszuk J, Szydlowski M, Switonski M. The ACACA and SREBF1 genes are promising markers for pig carcass and performance traits, but not for fatty acid content in the longissimus dorsi muscle and adipose tissue. Meat Sci. 2013;95:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Miao Z, Zhu F, Zhang H, Chang X, Xie H, Zhang J, Xu Z. Developmental patterns of FASN and LIPE mRNA expression in adipose tissue of growing Jinhua and Landrace gilts. Czech J Anim Sci. 2010;55:557–564.
21. Ding S, Schinckel AP, Weber TE, Mersmann HJ. Expression of porcine transcription factors and genes related to fatty acid metabolism in different tissues and genetic populations. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:2127–2134. [PubMed]
22. Nafikov RA, Beitz DC. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in farm animals. J Nutr. 2007;137:702–705. [PubMed]
23. Yu K, Shu G, Yuan F, Zhu X, Gao P, Wang S, et al. Fatty acid and transcriptome profiling of longissimus dorsi muscles between pig breeds differing in meat quality. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9:108–118. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5306. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Duran-Montgé P, Theil PK, Lauridsen C, Esteve-Garcia E. Fat metabolism is regulated by altered gene expression of lipogenic enzymes and regulatory factors in liver and adipose tissue but not in semimembranosus muscle of pigs during the fattening period. Animal. 2009;3:1580–1590. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990450. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Yingkai L, Mingzhou L, Jiuqiang G, Xuewei L. Breed, gender and anatomic location-specific expression patterns of the porcine insig-1 and insig-2 genes. Sci Res Essays. 2012;7:1573–1576.
26. Mourot J, Hermier D. Lipids in monogastric animal meat. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2001;41:109–118. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2001116. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Maharani D, Jung Y, Jo C, Jung W-Y, Nam K-C, Seo K-S, et al. Evaluation of three candidate genes affecting fatty acid composition in pigs. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2012;32:6–12. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.1.6. [Cross Ref]
28. Suzuki K, Ishida M, Kadowaki H, Shibata T, Uchida H, Nishida A. Genetic correlations among fatty acid compositions in different sites of fat tissues, meat production, and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:2026–2034. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-660. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer