PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brheartjLink to Publisher's site
 
Br Heart J. 1985 June; 53(6): 587–593.
PMCID: PMC481819

Survival in second degree atrioventricular block.

Abstract

Two hundred and 14 patients with chronic second degree heart block were seen and followed up in the Devon Heart Block and Bradycardia Survey between 1968 and 1982. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of block. In group 1 there were 77 patients with Mobitz type I block (mean age 69 years), in group 2, 86 patients with Mobitz type II block (mean age 74 years), and in group 3, 51 with 2:1 or 3:1 block (mean age 75 years). The five year survival was similar in all groups, being 57%, 61%, and 53% in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The presence or absence of bundle branch block did not appear to influence prognosis. In particular, patients in group 1 without bundle branch block did not fare any better than those in group 2 both with and without bundle branch block. One hundred and three of the patients were fitted with pacemakers, the proportion being greatest in group 2. In each group a significantly larger number of paced patients survived than unpaced. The five year survival for all the paced patients in the study was 78% compared with 41% for the unpaced. Since the paced patients were slightly younger than the unpaced two age matched groups of 74 patients each were selected from the paced and unpaced patients, but the five year survival of those paced was still significantly better. It is concluded that in the patients in the present study chronic Mobitz type I block has a similar prognosis to that of Mobitz type II block. Unpaced patients with both types did very badly, whereas those fitted with pacemakers had a five year survival similar to that expected for the normal population. These results refute the benign reputation of chronic Mobitz type I block and imply that patients with this condition should be considered for pacemaker implantation on similar criteria to those adopted for patients with higher degrees of block.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Shaw DB, Holman RR, Gowers JI. Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome). Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):139–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Denes P, Dhingra RC, Wu D, Wyndham CR, Amat-y-Leon F, Rosen KM. Sudden death in patients with chronic bifascicular block. Arch Intern Med. 1977 Aug;137(8):1005–1010. [PubMed]
  • McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH, Murphy E, DeMots H, Ritzmann L, Kanarek PE, Kauffman S. Natural history of "high-risk" bundle-branch block: final report of a prospective study. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jul 15;307(3):137–143. [PubMed]
  • Hauer RN, Lie KI, Liem KL, Durrer D. Long-term prognosis in patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1982 May;49(7):1581–1585. [PubMed]
  • DONOSO E, ADLER LN, FRIEDBERG CK. UNUSUAL FORMS OF SECOND-DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK, INCLUDING MOBITZ TYPE-II BLOCK, ASSOCIATED WITH THE MORGAGNI-ADAMS-STOKES SYNDROME. Am Heart J. 1964 Feb;67:150–157. [PubMed]
  • Zipes DP. Second-degree atrioventricular block. Circulation. 1979 Sep;60(3):465–472. [PubMed]
  • Strasberg B, Amat-Y-Leon F, Dhingra RC, Palileo E, Swiryn S, Bauernfeind R, Wyndham C, Rosen KM. Natural history of chronic second-degree atrioventricular nodal block. Circulation. 1981 May;63(5):1043–1049. [PubMed]
  • Dhingra RC, Denes P, Wu D, Chuquimia R, Rosen KM. The significance of second degree atrioventricular block and bundle branch block. Observations regarding site and type of block. Circulation. 1974 Apr;49(4):638–646. [PubMed]
  • Mond HG. The bradyarrhythmias: current indications for permanent pacing (part I). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1981 Jul;4(4):432–442. [PubMed]
  • Horgan JH. Cardiac pacing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jun 30;288(6435):1942–1944. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shaw DB, Eraut D. Prevalence and morbidity of heart block in Devon. Br Med J. 1970 Jan 17;1(5689):144–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shaw DB, Kekwick CA. Potential candidates for pacemakers. Survey of heart block and sinoatrial disorder (sick sinus syndrome). Br Heart J. 1978 Feb;40(2):99–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • CUTLER SJ, EDERER F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699–712. [PubMed]
  • Langendorf R, Pick A. Atrioventricular block, type II (Mobitz)--its nature and clinical significance. Circulation. 1968 Nov;38(5):819–821. [PubMed]
  • Narula OS, Scherlag BJ, Javier RP, Hildner FJ, Samet P. Analysis of the A-V conduction defect in complete heart block utilizing His bundle electrograms. Circulation. 1970 Mar;41(3):437–448. [PubMed]
  • Rosen KM, Loeb HS, Gunnar RM, Rahimtoola SH. Mobitz type II block without bundle-branch block. Circulation. 1971 Dec;44(6):1111–1119. [PubMed]
  • Rosen KM, Gunnar RM, Rahimtoola SH. Site and type of second degree A-V block. Chest. 1972 Feb;61(2):99–100. [PubMed]
  • Goldreyer BN. Intracardiac electrocardiography in the analysis and understanding of cardiac arrhythmias. Ann Intern Med. 1972 Jul;77(1):117–136. [PubMed]
  • Rosen KM, Dhingra RC, Loeb HS, Rahimtoola SH. Chronic heart block in adults. Clinical and electrophysiological observations. Arch Intern Med. 1973 May;131(5):663–672. [PubMed]
  • Kannel WB, Thom TJ. Declining cardiovascular mortality. Circulation. 1984 Sep;70(3):331–336. [PubMed]
  • Demoulin JC, Simar LJ, Kulbertus HE. Quantitative study of left bundle branch fibrosis in left anterior hemiblock: A stereologic approach. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Nov;36(6):751–756. [PubMed]
  • Rossi L. His bundle in electrocardiographic semantics of AV block. Anatomoclinical considerations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1980 May;3(3):275–285. [PubMed]
  • Ohkawa S, Sugiura M, Itoh Y, Kitano K, Hiraoka K, Ueda K, Murakami M. Electrophysiologic and histologic correlations in chronic complete atrioventricular block. Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):215–231. [PubMed]
  • JOHNSON RL, AVERILL KH, LAMB LE. Electrocardiographic findings in 67,375 asymptomatic subjects. VI. Right bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1960 Jul;6:143–152. [PubMed]
  • Rose G, Baxter PJ, Reid DD, McCartney P. Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic findings in middle-aged men. Br Heart J. 1978 Jun;40(6):636–643. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scott O, Williams GJ, Fiddler GI. Results of 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of electrocardiogram in 131 healthy boys aged 10 to 13 years. Br Heart J. 1980 Sep;44(3):304–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Viitasalo MT, Kala R, Eisalo A. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording in endurance athletes. Br Heart J. 1982 Mar;47(3):213–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brodsky M, Wu D, Denes P, Kanakis C, Rosen KM. Arrhythmias documented by 24 hour continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in 50 male medical students without apparent heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Mar;39(3):390–395. [PubMed]
  • Sobotka PA, Mayer JH, Bauernfeind RA, Kanakis C, Jr, Rosen KM. Arrhythmias documented by 24-hour continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in young women without apparent heart disease. Am Heart J. 1981 Jun;101(6):753–759. [PubMed]
  • Clarke JM, Hamer J, Shelton JR, Taylor S, Venning GR. The rhythm of the normal human heart. Lancet. 1976 Sep 4;1(7984):508–512. [PubMed]
  • Clee MD, Smith N, McNeill GP, Wright DS. Dysrhythmias in apparently healthy elderly subjects. Age Ageing. 1979 Aug;8(3):173–176. [PubMed]
  • Camm AJ, Evans KE, Ward DE, Martin A. The rhythm of the heart in active elderly subjects. Am Heart J. 1980 May;99(5):598–603. [PubMed]
  • Stock RJ, Macken DL. Observations on heart block during continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1968 Nov;38(5):993–1005. [PubMed]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group