|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Our goal was to examine associations of infant sleep and feeding patterns with maternal sleep and mood among women at risk for postpartum depression.
Participants were 30 women (age±SD = 28.3±5.1 years) with a history of MDD (but not in a mood episode at enrollment) who completed daily sleep diaries, wore wrist actigraphs to estimate sleep, and had mood assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) during 4 separate weeks of the perinatal period (33 weeks pregnancy and weeks 2, 6, and 16 postpartum). They logged their infants’ sleep and feeding behaviors daily and reported postnatal stress on the Childcare Stress Inventory (CSI) at week 16.
Mothers’ actigraphically-estimated sleep showed associations with infant sleep and feeding patterns only at postpartum week 2. Shorter duration of the longest infant sleep bout was associated with shorter maternal sleep duration (p=.02) and lower sleep efficiency (p=.04), and maternal sleep efficiency was negatively associated with number of infant sleep bouts (p =.008) and duration of infant feeding (p =.008). Neither infant sleep nor feeding was associated with maternal sleep at 6 or 16 weeks, but more disturbed infant sleep and more frequent feeding at 6 weeks were associated with higher HAM-D scores at 6 and 16 weeks and higher CSI scores.
Sleep in the mother-infant dyad is most tightly linked in the early postpartum weeks, but mothers continue to experience disturbed sleep and infant sleep and feeding behaviors continue to be associated with mothers’ depressive symptoms and stress ratings as long as 16 weeks postpartum. These data imply that interventions designed to improve maternal sleep and postpartum mood should include both mothers and infants, because improving infant sleep alone is not likely to improve maternal sleep and poor infant sleep is linked to postpartum depression and stress.
Many reports confirm that women experience significant sleep disruption during pregnancy and the postpartum period (Coble et al. 1994; Doan et al. 2007; Driver and Shapiro 1992; Gay et al. 2004; Goyal et al. 2007; Hedman et al. 2002; Horiuchi and Nishihara 1999; Karacan et al. 1969; Kennedy et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2000a; Lee et al. 2000b; Lee and Lee 2007; Mindell and Jacobson 2000; Montgomery-Downs et al. 2010b; Nishihara and Horiuchi 1998; Parry et al. 2000; Signal et al. 2007; Swain et al. 1997; Wilkie and Shapiro 1992; Wolfson et al. 2003), and several studies have shown associations between disturbed maternal sleep and development of postpartum depressed mood (Dennis and Ross 2005; Goyal et al. 2009; Goyal et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2000a; Swain et al. 1997). Although infant sleep and feeding patterns likely contribute to maternal postpartum sleep disturbance, associations of infant sleep and feeding with maternal sleep and mood are under studied, particularly among women at high risk for perinatal depression.
Epidemiologic studies show associations between maternal reports of infant sleep problems and increased maternal depressive symptoms in the concurrent postpartum period. For example, a study of 738 Australian mothers of 6-12 month old infants showed that women who reported that their baby had a sleep problem were more than twice as likely to score above the clinical threshold on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) relative to those who did not (Hiscock and Wake 2001). Similarly, a study of 505 postpartum women who did not exhibit high EPDS scores at postpartum week 1 showed that mothers reporting 3 or more infant awakenings per night and less than 6 hours maternal sleep in a 24 hour period had clinically-significant EPDS scores at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum (Dennis and Ross 2005).
Armitage and colleagues (Armitage et al. 2009) compared infant sleep measured with actigraphy at ages 2 and 24 weeks in 11 infants whose mothers had a diagnosis or history of major depressive disorder (MDD) versus 7 infants born to women with no personal or family history of depression. The infants of mothers with MDD took longer to fall asleep and had shorter nighttime sleep durations, decreased sleep efficiency, and more night awakenings at both ages. Thus, this study showed that associations between maternal history of MDD and infant sleep behavior are evident at a very early developmental stage (i.e., at week 2 of life) and that sleep differences in infants born to women with MDD persist for at least 6 months. This study did not examine associations between infant sleep and maternal sleep, however, and maternal mood symptoms were not reported.
Infant feeding behaviors have also been examined with respect to maternal sleep and mood. A large epidemiologic study demonstrated that new mothers who were breastfeeding reported that they had longer sleep durations and shorter sleep latencies than formula-feeding women (Kendall-Tackett et al. 2013). In addition, studies that measured sleep objectively with actigraphy in breastfeeding and formula-feeding mothers showed that women who breast fed had equivalent (e.g., (Montgomery-Downs et al. 2010a)) or longer (e.g.,(Doan et al. 2014)) sleep durations than new mothers who used formula. With respect to feeding and mood, a recent survey of 272 mothers of infants up to 24 months old showed that maternal reports of infant sleep and feeding problems were associated independently with higher maternal depression scores on the EPDS (Muscat et al. 2014).
Several studies have measured infant sleep with respect to maternal sleep, depression, or stress in the context of interventions aimed at improving infant sleep and thereby the outcomes for new parents, e.g., (Hiscock et al. 2007; Hiscock and Wake 2002; Mindell et al. 2011; Wolfson et al. 1992). Though methods in these trials varied, several showed that the interventions improved parental reports of infant sleep as well as maternal self-reported mood, stress, or sleep disturbance in those who received the interventions compared to controls. This area of research is not without controversy, however, as one recent systematic review of 43 such studies indicated that behavioral interventions aimed at improving infant sleep during the first six months of life do not improve long-term outcomes for mothers or infants and may increase risk of unintended outcomes, such as early discontinuation of breastfeeding and increased anxiety among new mothers (Douglas and Hill 2013).
Complementary to studies on improving infant sleep, a small number of intervention trials have focused on improving maternal sleep during the postpartum period (Lee and Gay 2011; Stremler et al. 2013; Stremler et al. 2006; Swanson et al. 2013). These interventions used actigraphy or sleep diaries to measure maternal sleep, but did not measure infant sleep. Furthermore, the interventions had mixed results in improving maternal sleep, but taken together, the data indicate that women at higher risk of postpartum sleep problems are more likely to benefit from sleep intervention.
In summary, despite a burgeoning interest in research on perinatal sleep and maternal mood, gaps in this literature remain, including describing associations between maternal sleep and infant sleep across the early weeks of development and associations of these sleep patterns with maternal mood and stress. A deeper understanding of sleep in the mother-infant dyad, particularly in women at high risk for postpartum sleep and mood difficulties, likely is necessary to develop more effective interventions to improve both maternal and infant sleep. Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to examine associations between maternal sleep and infant sleep and feeding patterns at 2, 6, and 16 weeks postpartum in women with a history of MDD; and (2) to assess associations between infant sleep and feeding and maternal depressed mood and maternal stress during the postpartum period. We hypothesized that shorter, more interrupted infant sleep and longer and more frequent feedings would be associated with more maternal sleep disruption, higher depression scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and higher reported stress on the Childcare Stress Inventory.
We recruited expectant mothers ages 18-40 at ~33 weeks gestation calculated by last menstrual period who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for history of MDD and were not in a current mood episode. Interested women telephoned the laboratory in response to flyers, brochures, newspaper advertisements, and a direct mailing. History of MDD and absence of a mood episode at enrollment were confirmed by a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders (SCID I/P, (First et al. 2002)). We excluded potential participants with a primary Axis I diagnosis other than MDD; learning disability, mental retardation, or developmental delay; diagnosis of a sleep disorder (including primary insomnia); high-risk pregnancy; current employment as night shift worker; disability that interfered with testing; current alcohol/drug dependence; and expectation that infants would not be living in the home or would have a nighttime caregiver other than the mother. Women with comorbid anxiety disorders were not excluded. We did not select participants on the basis of parity, feeding plans, tobacco use, or use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers. The Rhode Island Hospital and Women and Infants Hospital institutional review boards approved the study. Participants gave signed informed consent and were paid for participating.
Sleep measures were taken for one week each at 3rd trimester (~33 weeks gestation) and at postpartum weeks 2, 6, and 16. Participants completed a daily sleep/wake diary developed for perinatal women (Wolfson et al. 2003) and called the laboratory’s time-stamped voicemail each day when they woke up. Diary items include bedtime, rising time, amount of sleep, naps, and times when they removed the actigraph, as well a chart to record their infant’s sleep (see below).
Women wore a wrist actigraph (Octagonal Basic or Micro Motionlogger Watch, AMI, Ardsley, NY) continuously on the nondominant wrist during each study week. Actigraphy data were recorded in 1-minute bins using the zero crossing mode with a filter setting of 18 and were analyzed using Action-W software (AMI) algorithm, which has been validated with polysomnography (Sadeh et al. 1994). We estimated the following sleep measures from actigraphy: sleep onset time (first of three continuous epochs of sleep occurring after the bedtime reported on the sleep diary); sleep offset time (last epoch of 5 continuous epochs of sleep occurring before the wake time reported on the sleep diary); time in bed (TIB, hours between sleep onset and sleep offset); total sleep time (TST, hours of estimated sleep occurring between sleep onset and sleep offset); and sleep efficiency (TST ÷ TIB * 100). We scored sleep periods occurring between sleep offset and sleep onset as naps. To distinguish between daytime sleep episodes and periods when the participant had removed the actigraph or was engaged in quiet wakefulness, naps identified by actigraphy were confirmed by sleep diary and/or by questioning participants about periods of inactivity when we downloaded the actigraph.
We derived the following sleep measures from the “Baby’s Sleep/Wake Chart” included on the mother’s daily sleep/wake diary and calculated weekly averages for each measure (see Figure 1 for example of a completed sleep chart):
Participants received the sleep diary booklet that contained the “Baby’s Sleep/Wake Chart” on the first day of each study week, but since the drop-off times varied from person-to-person and from week-to-week, variables for maternal and infant sleep were taken from bedtime on day 1 through wake time on Day 7 provided that diaries were complete and the actigraph was worn. Data from individual diary days with less than 50% complete were excluded from analyses. Reliability of diary scoring was determined by comparing two scorers (INI and KMS) in a randomly selected sample of all records. Eleven percent of records were double-scored and showed high inter-scorer reliability; for example, Kappa was 0.83 for infant sleep duration.
We assessed symptoms of depressed mood with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D, (Hamilton 1960)) performed by a trained, board-certified psychiatrist (KMS) at the end of each monitoring week. Maternal stress was measured at 16 weeks postpartum with the Childcare Stress Inventory (CSI) (Cutrona 1983), which asks how many of 21 stressful experiences occurred for them since the baby was born. Previous work has shown an average of 5 stress items endorsed by postpartum women (Cutrona 1983). Among our participants, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86 for the CSI.
We used SPSS Version 19 (IBM, Chicago, IL) and SAS version 9.4 (The SAS Institute, Cary NC) for data analysis. Data are summarized as means with standard deviations or 95% confidence intervals. Changes across time in infant sleep and feeding measures and maternal sleep patterns were examined with analysis of variance and post-hoc comparisons were made using Tukey HSD. We modeled associations between infant and maternal sleep using generalized mixed linear models (SAS proc glimmix) to account for the expectation that individual participants’ data would be correlated over time and to provide flexibility with regards to the distribution of the dependent variables. Each model contained terms for the fixed effects of time point, the independent variable of interest, and their interaction (reported as an F-statistic). Subsequently, the slopes of the associations between the independent variable with the dependent variable were tested separately for each postpartum week (reported as a t-statistic) with alpha maintained at 0.05 across these multiple tests using the Holm method.
Thirty women (mean age±SD = 28.3±5.1 years) were eligible for inclusion in these analyses. Twenty-eight women participated at all four time points; 2 women did not complete the 16-week assessment. Ten participants (33%) were first-time mothers, and the median number of children among those who were already mothers was 1 (range 1-3 children). Median number of lifetime depressive episodes was 2 (range = 1-10 episodes). Other measures describing the sample are shown in Table 1.
Maternal sleep measures estimated with wrist actigraphy at 3rd trimester and 2, 6, and 16 weeks postpartum are shown in Table 2. Average nighttime sleep time was just over 6 hours at 2 weeks postpartum and by 16 weeks postpartum had increased to an average of about 6.5 hours, which is not a statistically significant change. Average maternal sleep efficiency was lowest at postpartum week 2 at 72.4%, but increased significantly to 82.7% by 16 weeks postpartum, back to 3rd trimester levels. Analysis of variance showed main effects of perinatal week for time in bed, minutes of wakefulness, and sleep efficiency. Post-hoc analyses showed significantly longer time in bed at 2 weeks compared with 16 weeks postpartum, significantly greater nocturnal wake at 2 and 6 weeks postpartum compared with 33 weeks gestation and 16 weeks postpartum, and significantly lower sleep efficiency at 2 and 6 weeks postpartum compared with 33 weeks gestation and 16 weeks postpartum. Sleep onset and sleep offset times did not differ significantly across the perinatal period in our sample.
Median number of naps was 2 at 3rd trimester and postpartum weeks 2 and 6 and 1 nap at week 16. All participants reported napping at least one time during the study period. The number of women who reported zero naps at 3rd trimester was 5, 4 at postpartum week 2, 5 at postpartum week 6, and 9 at postpartum week 16. Number of naps, nap length, and nap duration did not differ across the perinatal period.
We attempted to include as many infant sleep diaries as possible for each participant at each time point. We were able to include 92% of diary days from postpartum week 2, 92% from week 6 and 81% at week 16. The main reason for individual day non-inclusions was that > 50% of the diary was incomplete. Median completed diary days was 7.
Infant sleep data are summarized in Table 3. At 2 weeks postpartum, mothers reported average infant sleep times of 15.3 hours per day, with sleep divided into ~8 bouts per day; mean feeding duration was 3.9 hours per day. Infant behavior showed expected developmental changes from postpartum week 2 to postpartum week 16, including fewer bouts of sleep per 24 hours, decreased sleep duration, fewer feedings, shorter total feeding duration, and longer sleep bouts at night. Infants’ “bedtimes” shifted earlier from week 2 to week 16, while the interval between infant bedtime and mothers’ actigraphically-estimated sleep onset lengthened from postpartum week 2 to postpartum week 16.
The GLIMMIX procedure showed significant overall fixed effects of infant’s longest sleep bout on maternal sleep efficiency (F1,46=9.37, p=.004), number of infant sleep bouts on maternal sleep efficiency (F1,48=10.40, p=.002), and infant feeding duration on maternal sleep time (F1,48=4.50, p=.04), as well as trends for fixed effects of infant’s longest sleep on maternal sleep time (F1,46=3.06, p=.09) and for infant feeding duration on maternal sleep efficiency (F1,48=2.86, p=.09).
Further analyses of the slopes of individual weeks revealed significant associations between infant sleep and feeding patterns and maternal nighttime sleep at 2 weeks postpartum. Specifically, at postpartum week 2, shorter duration of longest infant sleep bout was associated with shorter maternal sleep duration (t46=2.89, adjusted p=.02, Figure 2A) and lower maternal sleep efficiency (t46=2.55, adjusted p=.04, Figure 2B). In addition, at 2 weeks postpartum, maternal sleep efficiency was negatively associated with number of infant sleep bouts (t48=-3.16, adjusted p =.008, Figure 2C) and with duration of feeding (t48= -2.59, adjusted p =.008, Figure 2D).
We did not observe similar associations at postpartum weeks 6 and 16. Infant total sleep time, infant bedtime, difference between infant and maternal bedtimes, and number of feeds were not associated significantly with maternal sleep measures at any time point.
Average HAM-D scores were 6.9±3.6 at 33 weeks gestation, 7.9±5.3 at 2 weeks postpartum, 8.1±4.1 at 6 weeks postpartum, and 9.2±7.4 at 16 weeks postpartum. We observed HAM-D scores greater than 13 (indicating moderate depression) in 2 participants at 33 weeks gestation, 4 at week 2, 3 at week 6, and 6 at week 16.
There was an overall fixed effect of average number of reported infant sleep bouts on maternal HAM-D score (F1,48=5.43, p=.02), with a higher number of bouts associated with more depressive symptoms; associations at 2 weeks (t48=2.05, adjusted p =.09) and 6 weeks (t48=2.46, adjusted p =.052) postpartum accounted for this effect. This finding was consistent, but significance was reduced to a trend, when maternal sleep items were removed from the calculated HAM-D score (F1,48=3.68, p=.06).
Average CSI score at week 16 was 6.2±4.7, range 0-19. Lower total infant sleep duration at postpartum weeks 2 (F1,27=7.81, p=.009) and 6 (F1,25=5.73, p=.02) were associated with a higher number of stressors reported by mothers at week 16, but this finding was reduced to a trend at week 16 (F1,23=3.31, p=.08). Number of infant sleep bouts at week 16, however, was positively associated with mothers’ reported stressors at week 16 (F1,23=12.57, p=.002).
Feeding behaviors also showed an association with maternal reported stress on the CSI. Report of a higher number of stressors at week 16 was associated with a higher number of daily feedings at postpartum weeks 2 (F1,26=8.67, p=.007) and 6 (F1,26=8.19, p=.008), with a similar trend observed at week 16 (F1,23=3.23, p=.09).
These analyses show associations of infant sleep and feeding behaviors with maternal nighttime sleep efficiency and sleep duration in the second week postpartum. We observed lower sleep efficiencies and shorter sleep durations among mothers who reported that their infants had shorter bouts of sleep at night during postpartum week 2. We also found an association between longer reported infant daily feeding durations at two weeks and less maternal sleep. These data indicate that maternal sleep is linked to her reports of infant sleep and feeding behaviors in the early postpartum period. After 2 weeks postpartum, however, associations between infant sleep and feeding patterns and maternal sleep were not seen. Thus, although average maternal sleep durations measured with actigraphy (Week 2 mean TST = 6.2 hours, Week 6 mean TST = 6.3 hours) and maternally-reported infant sleep durations (Week 2 mean TST = 15.3 hours, Week 6 mean TST = 14.5 hours) did not change significantly from 2 weeks to 6 weeks postpartum, maternal and infant sleep behaviors were not coupled as tightly after 2 weeks postpartum. This implies that factors other than infant sleep and feeding patterns impact maternal sleep in later weeks.
We are not aware of comparable studies that have assessed associations between maternal and infant sleep at various time points. Indeed, the few studies that have assessed both maternal and infant sleep have not focused on associations between sleep behaviors in the mother-infant dyad (e.g., (Quillin and Glenn 2004)). Behavioral patterns within the mother-infant dyad undergo dynamic changes during the early postpartum weeks (Acebo and Thoman 1995; Anders et al. 1992), and we may have been unable to show associations in maternal and infant sleep patterns after 2 weeks because of variability in infant development, as well as differences and changes in maternal responsiveness during that time period. Nevertheless, the data presented here imply that infant behaviors are not the main factor driving sleep disturbance in new mothers after 2 weeks postpartum. This interpretation is supported by the work of Doering (Doering 2013) who examined sleep in 143 socioeconomically disadvantaged women at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postpartum. Although waking at night to care for their infant was the most commonly reported source of sleep disturbance among these new mothers, their sleep was also disturbed by factors known to contribute to shortened or disturbed sleep in the general adult population. For instance, at 4 weeks postpartum 84% of participants reported caffeine use, 26% reported smoking cigarettes, > 20% reported sleeping with a child other than the infant in her bed, and 52% reported sleeping with the television on for all or part of the night.
Our data on maternal and infant sleep times are similar to those reported in the literature at similar time points. For instance, Quillin and Glenn (Quillin and Glenn 2004) reported average maternally-reported infant sleep time of 13.9 hours and maternal nocturnal sleep time of 5.8 hours at 4 weeks postpartum in their study comparing sleep between breast- and bottle-feeding mothers. Lee and colleagues (Lee et al. 2000b) reported a mean polysomographically-recorded sleep duration of 379 minutes in mothers at 3-4 weeks postpartum, which is nearly identical to our sleep durations estimated with actigraphy. In our sample, new mothers obtained an average of just over 6 hours of nighttime sleep during postpartum weeks 2 and 6, with ranges across women of 4.7-7.8 hours at 2 weeks postpartum and 4.7-8.1 hours at 6 weeks postpartum. By 16 weeks, average sleep duration had increased to only 6.5 hours with a range of 3.8-8.5 hours. Although napping was common in our sample, on average, naps added less than 20 minutes of sleep per day to mother’s total sleep time. This represents a pattern of insufficient sleep and also indicates that maternal sleep disturbance did not improve much from 2 weeks postpartum to 16 weeks postpartum. Such chronically short sleep durations would be expected to produce impairments in cognition, mood, and physiologic regulation (Basner and Dinges 2012; Insana et al. 2013; Vgontzas et al. 2004). Nevertheless, there are no guidelines for perinatal women and the clinicians who care for them regarding how severe and for how long shortened and disturbed sleep should be tolerated before treatment is considered during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Further work is needed in this area.
Though infant sleep and feeding patterns did not show significant associations with maternal sleep after 2 weeks postpartum in our sample, we did find associations between infants’ sleep and feeding and new mothers’ depression and stress during later postpartum weeks. Mothers who reported more infant sleep bouts at 6 weeks were rated as more depressed and those who reported less infant sleep and more feeding bouts at 2 and 6 weeks postpartum reported more postpartum stress. This is consistent with previous reports in the literature showing associations between reports of infant sleep problems and maternal depressed mood (Dennis and Ross 2005; Hiscock and Wake 2001). Thus, although maternal sleep in our sample only tracked infant sleep in the very early postpartum weeks, infant sleep and feeding behaviors continue to associate with mothers’ mood and stress ratings at later postpartum time points. Taken together, these findings indicate that interventions designed to improve maternal sleep and mood must focus on both mother and infant, because improving infant sleep alone is not likely to improve maternal sleep and poor infant sleep can contribute to maternal depression and stress even if it is not affecting sleep directly.
Studies examining the maternal-infant dyad often raise questions about whether the phenomena of interest represent “nature” or “nurture.” In other words, are infants born to mothers with a history of depression more likely to have sleep disruption for biological reasons, or do women with a history of depression treat their infants differently, thus resulting in more sleep problems in their infants? Armitage and colleagues’ data shows that infants with “exposure” to a mother with a history of depression had more sleep disturbance than controls as early as 2 weeks postpartum (Armitage et al. 2009) regardless of mother’s symptoms at the time of the assessment, suggesting that factors other than maternal behavior – i.e., in utero environment or genetics – likely play a role in sleep behavior in infants. This notion is supported by animal studies that show differential responsiveness of circadian and sleep behavior in mice pups depending on their mothers’ prenatal light-dark exposures (Ciarleglio et al. 2011). We speculate that expectant mothers’ prenatal sleep behaviors may influence infants’ behavioral regulation and that biological and behavioral factors during pregnancy and the postpartum period contribute to the development of sleep and feeding patterns.
Our data have implications for interventions designed to improve maternal and infant sleep and prevent perinatal depression. If maternal sleep patterns during pregnancy do indeed forecast infant behavioral outcomes, early interventions, i.e., during pregnancy, may result in improved sleep in mother and child after birth. Treatment strategies that address sleep problems during pregnancy may also improve obstetric outcomes, since disturbed sleep during pregnancy has been shown to predict untoward birth outcomes, such as increased pain perception (Beebe and Lee 2007; Lee and Gay 2004). Introducing a sleep intervention during pregnancy also has the practical advantage of allowing expectant mothers time to focus on their sleep before the arrival of the infant. If future studies show that improving maternal sleep during pregnancy has lasting positive effects postpartum for mother and baby, this may improve compliance with such treatments, particularly if clinicians promote healthy sleep in expectant mothers instead of ascribing perinatal sleep difficulties to pregnancy or a new baby regardless of duration or severity of symptoms.
One limitation of this study is that we examined a modestly sized, heterogeneous sample of women with a previous history of depression. Thus, since our study focused on women who are vulnerable to postpartum depression, our findings may not generalize to non-depressed mothers and their infants. That being said, relatively few of our participants developed a postpartum major depressive episode during the study, and we speculate that we may have observed greater sleep disturbance among new mothers and their infants if more had experienced postpartum depression. In addition, our measure of infant sleep was through maternal self-report and although reported infant sleep behaviors followed expected developmental trends, mothers’ reports of infant sleep might be different than objective measures, i.e., actigraphy or direct observation, in infants. Another limitation is that although most women in our sample reported some involvement with the father of the baby, we did not assess the quality or quantity of support provided by fathers or others, and these factors likely impact mothers’ sleep, mood, and stress levels. Similarly, we did not measure infants’ sleeping arrangements (i.e., co-sleeping), the impact of the infants’ siblings on maternal sleep, or other characteristics of the infant that might impact the mother-infant relationship, e.g., excessive crying, colic, or feeding difficulties. More “difficult” infants might be expected to increase mood disturbances in new mothers. Finally, we acknowledge that associations between infant behaviors and maternal sleep disturbance, stress, and depression are likely bidirectional and our study did not assess causality. Nevertheless, we note that it has been argued that direction of influence within the mother-infant is not a meaningful or useful construct in the early postpartum period because the dyad is so intertwined at this time (Acebo and Thoman 1995).
In summary, in our sample of perinatal women and their infants, insufficient maternal sleep was evident at 2, 6, and 16 weeks postpartum, but was related significantly to infant sleep patterns only at postpartum week 2. Nevertheless, more disturbed infant sleep continued to be associated with higher maternal stress and depressed mood at later time points. Interventions aimed at preventing postpartum depression and improving postpartum sleep should focus on both members of the mother-infant dyad.
This study was funded by K23-MH086689 from the National Institutes of Health and a J. Christian Gillin Award from the Sleep Research Society Foundation to KMS and a grant from the Brown University/Women and Infants Hospital National Center of Excellence in Women’s Health Seed Grant to KMS and TP. The authors thank Julie Quattrucci, Aubree Hoepper, and Emily Mepham for assistance with data collection. We acknowledge Christine Acebo, PhD and Mary A. Carskadon, PhD for helpful comments on the manuscript. Finally, we are grateful to the study participants and their families for participating in our study.
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Participants gave informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study and were paid for their participation.