PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of conphysConservation PhysiologyAboutAuthor GuidelinesEditorial BoardSign up to e-alerts
 
Conserv Physiol. 2015; 3(1): cov026.
Published online 2015 July 1. doi:  10.1093/conphys/cov026
PMCID: PMC4778438

Towards a better monitoring of seed ageing under ex situ seed conservation

Abstract

Long-term conservation of 7.4 million ex situ seed accessions held in agricultural genebanks and botanic gardens worldwide is a challenging mission for human food security and ecosystem services. Recent advances in seed biology and genomics may have opened new opportunities for effective management of seed germplasm under long-term storage. Here, we review the current development of tools for assessing seed ageing and research advances in seed biology and genomics, with a focus on exploring their potential as better tools for monitoring of seed ageing. Seed ageing is found to be associated with the changes reflected in reactive oxygen species and mitochondria-triggered programmed cell deaths, expression of antioxidative genes and DNA and protein repair genes, chromosome telomere lengths, epigenetic regulation of related genes (microRNA and methylation) and altered organelle and nuclear genomes. Among these changes, the signals from mitochondrial and nuclear genomes may show the most promise for use in the development of tools to predict seed ageing. Non-destructive and non-invasive analyses of stored seeds through calorimetry or imaging techniques are also promising. It is clear that research into developing advanced tools for monitoring seed ageing to supplement traditional germination tests will be fruitful for effective conservation of ex situ seed germplasm.

Keywords: Ex situ conservation, seed ageing, seed storage, viability biomarkers, viability prediction

Introduction

The last 100 years have seen increased concerns about the erosion of genetic diversity in agricultural crops and the loss of biodiversity in natural ecosystems (Baur, 1914; Harlan and Martini, 1936; National Research Council, 1972; Corvalan et al., 2005), and large global efforts have been made to conserve plant genetic resources (Frankel and Bennett, 1970). Currently, there are more than 7.4 million accessions of seed germplasm conserved in 1750 genebanks around the world, and more than 130 genebanks have 10 000 or more accessions (FAO, 2010). More than 30 000 wild plant species are conserved in stored seeds in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Kunming Institute of Botany (Li and Pritchard, 2009). Ex situ seed storage is among the most effective ways to conserve desiccation-tolerant seed germplasm (Smith et al., 2003). However, seeds in long-term storage will eventually lose their viability; therefore assessment of seed deterioration over time is required (Walters et al., 2005; Hay and Probert, 2013; van Treuren et al., 2013). Given such a huge volume of ex situ genetic resources, the long-term conservation is a challenging mission, and yet critical for human food security and ecosystem services.

The maintenance of ex situ seed viability over long periods of time in genebanks is a key element in conservation of plant genetic resources. Standards aimed at maintaining seed viability have been developed and applied in genebank management procedures, including drying and storage under low seed moisture content and temperature (FAO, 2014). However, seed longevity varies among species and genotypes, and stored seeds will lose their viability over time to a level at which seed regeneration is required (Walters et al., 2005; Nagel et al., 2009; Probert et al., 2009; van Treuren et al., 2013). Regeneration is a costly genebank operation and may also negatively affect the genetic integrity of an accession through exposure to the influence of genetic drift, selection, contamination and human error. Therefore, it is important to maximize seed longevity and keep operational costs and logistics manageable through monitoring of seed deterioration, an essential task for managing stored germplasm (Engels and Visser, 2003).

Seed ageing or seed deterioration is commonly described as the loss of seed quality or viability over time (Priestley, 1986; Coolbear, 1995). Currently, a germination test is the standard method used to assess viability of ex situ conserved seeds (Smith et al., 2003; FAO, 2014). However, it destroys germplasm; can be a time-consuming and labour-intensive operation, given the huge amount of conserved germplasm; and neither assesses underlying mechanisms of seed deterioration nor provides any early projection of seed longevity for regeneration timing. Therefore, new non-destructive, low-cost, quick, sensitive and equally reliable methods are being sought for seed ageing assessments (Kranner et al., 2010b; Colville et al., 2012; Donà et al., 2013). As a result, many new tools for assessing seed ageing have been developed (Corbineau, 2012) and, following recent advances in seed biology and genomics, more sensitive tools, such as genomic or biochemical markers, are anticipated. Much research has been directed toward understanding the fundamentals of seed ageing and the roles of programmed cell death (PCD), mitochondria and epigenetics in seed deterioration. These advances have given us a clearer sense of the complex process of seed deterioration (Priestley, 1986; Smith and Berjak, 1995; Walters, 1998; McDonald, 1999; Rajjou et al., 2012; Ventura et al., 2012). Application of next generation sequencing technologies (Metzker, 2010) may allow for better detection of genomic changes associated with seed ageing (Bräutigam and Gowik, 2010) and may have provided a new opportunity for effective management of ex situ seed germplasm (Kocsy, 2015).

Here, we present a literature review with the following aims: (i) to summarize existing tools for assessing seed deterioration; (ii) to explore sensitive signals of seed ageing from recent research in seed biology and genomics; and (iii) to discuss the perspectives for the development of new sensitive tools for predicting seed ageing under ex situ storage. It is our hope that this review will advance our understanding of seed ageing and help to stimulate research efforts towards better monitoring of seed ageing under ex situ seed conservation.

Tools for assessing seed deterioration

Seed deterioration in genebanks is normally predicted through assessments of seed viability, germination, vigour and integrity. There are many different methods available to assess seed ageing (ISTA, 2005). The simplest testing method is direct visual inspection of seeds, but such inspection is unreliable. The most commonly used alternative is the standard germination test. There are also other, more complicated, biochemical testing procedures and non-destructive or non-invasive methods available. Recent years have seen the development of many new tools for assessing seed deterioration. Here, we highlight some of the recent developments.

Traditional tests

A germination test is the recommended method for testing seed deterioration in a genebank, because it is an accurate and reliable method. An accelerated ageing test (Delouche and Baskin, 1973) and electrical conductivity test (Thomas, 1960) are commonly used to assess seed vigour and facilitate seed ageing research. Available biochemical tests include the tetrazolium, vital colouring, enzyme activity, free fatty acid, hydrogen peroxide, indoxyl acetate, fast green, ferric chloride, sodium hypochlorite, excised embryo and X-ray tests. These methods are well described and their use is discussed in detail by Copeland and McDonald (1995). The use of these biochemical methods for seed quality testing is restricted specifically for seed viability, germinability, vigour or integrity under ISTA rules (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ista/rules). Biochemical tests are useful when germination tests yield variable results and have the advantage of being quick. However, some tests have the weakness of low accuracy and also require special skills to conduct and specialized knowledge to interpret test outcomes. These features help to explain, at least partly, why these tests are not usually recommended for general use in assessing seed deterioration in genebanks (Ellis et al., 1985; FAO, 2014).

Non-destructive and non-invasive methods

Non-destructive and/or non-invasive evaluations of seed deterioration are desirable (Agelet et al., 2012; Ishimwe et al., 2014), particularly for seed collections of low amount or low viability, because assayed seeds may not be affected or destroyed and could be used for regeneration or other purposes. Efforts have been made to develop reliable non-destructive and/or non-invasive tests (e.g. Prat, 1952; Mourik and Bakri, 1991; Crane and Walters et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2014). Here, we highlight several developments in the last decade. Kranner et al. (2010b) presented a method using infrared thermography to diagnose the developmental stage of a germinating pea (Pisum sativum) seed, non-invasively and in real time. Likewise, Kim et al. (2014) described an infrared thermal signal measurement system and photo-thermal signal and image reconstruction techniques for viability estimation of pepper (Capsicum annuum) seeds. Xin et al. (2013) demonstrated a real-time, non-invasive, micro-optrode technique for detecting seed viability in several crops by using oxygen influx. Isothermal microcalorimetry was explored for use as a tool to predict seed longevity in Ranunculus sceleratus (Hay et al., 2006), and differential scanning calorimetry was applied to measure seed deterioration in lettuce (Lactuca sativa; Crane and Walters, 2009). Measurement of volatile substance production from stored seeds has also been suggested as a valuable non-invasive alternative to predict the duration of the early, asymptomatic stage of seed deterioration (Hailstones and Smith, 1989; Mira et al., 2010; Colville et al., 2012). Min and Kang (2011) developed a simple, quick and non-destructive test method based on resazurin reagent, which was made by mixture of resazurin and yeast, for determining Brassicaceae seed viability. However, all of these methods have not been fully tested on stored seeds of different species and, consequently, are not yet widely applied in genebank operations.

Marker-based methods

Considerable research has also been conducted to develop biomarkers for evaluating seed quality (Corbineau, 2012). Table Table11 summarizes the biomarkers available for assessment of seed ageing, which were developed largely from biochemical and physiological research. These biomarkers are largely associated with factors involved in processes such as electrolyte leakage and ethylene production during imbibition, the cell cycle (DNA replication, β-tubulin), soluble sugar metabolism (in particular, changes in the raffinose family of oligosaccharides), the efficiency of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging through antioxidant defence systems (e.g. catalase activity) as well as various other proteins (11S globulin β-subunit, late embryogenesis abundant protein, heat-shock protein). One exciting example is the prediction tool used for detecting specific co-ordination during seed ageing mediated by common cis-elements and trans-factors, otherwise not detectable by conventional transcript analysis (Bassel et al., 2011). Recently, the half-cell reduction potentials of low molecular weight thiols, cysteine, cysteinyl-glycine and γ-glutamyl-cysteine, have been explored as biomarkers for seed ageing (Kranner et al., 2006; Birtic et al., 2011). These developments clearly illustrate the varied and exciting achievements in the search for informative biomarkers of seed viability, but no reports have been found so far on the applications of these biomarkers in genebank operations.

Table 1:
List of reported biomarkers associated with seed ageing of 17 plant species

Some genetic markers have also been developed (El-Maarouf-Bouteau et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2012) for detection of DNA damage and mutational events, including point mutations, structural rearrangements, small insertions or deletions of DNA and other genetic changes (Shatters et al., 1995; Liu et al., 2005; Atienzar and Jha, 2006; Vijay et al., 2009). The last decade has also seen some research effort directed towards the inference of the genetic basis of seed deterioration through investigation of quantitative trait loci associated with seed longevity (e.g. Nagel et al., 2009; Arif et al., 2012; Han et al., 2014). These efforts have helped to identify favourable longevity alleles for better prediction of seed longevity in plant germplasm collections. For example, four genomic regions identified for wheat (Triticum aestivum) seed longevity are known to contain genes associated with spike traits or biotic and abiotic stress responses (Arif et al., 2012). These findings are encouraging, because an accurate prediction of seed ageing before storage would allow for better viability monitoring of stored seeds (Nagel et al., 2015).

Seed ageing signals

The causes of seed ageing and death are not fully understood, because seed ageing is a complex biological trait and involves a network of molecular, biochemical, physiological and metabolic processes. Large efforts have been made to understand these ageing processes from the aspects of seed development, vigour, viability, longevity and germination. In recent years, many reviews have been published attempting to explain various aspects around the progression of seed deterioration (e.g. Bove et al., 2001; Chaudhury et al., 2001; Weber et al., 2005; Le et al., 2007; Linkies et al., 2010; Nonogaki et al., 2010; Rajjou et al., 2012; Ventura et al., 2012; Diaz-Vivancos et al., 2013; Sreenivasulu and Wobus, 2013). Here, we focus only on those studies revealing detectable signals of potential use for seed ageing assessment. Also, we search only for those signals reflecting various stages of seed deterioration, rather than for the molecular or cellular changes associated with the regulation and development of a process.

Molecular signals

Research has shown that seed ageing is associated with chromosomal aberration, telomere length change, DNA damage, DNA methylation and abnormal gene expression. Chromosomal aberrations in aged seeds comprise fragmentation, fusion, bridges, ring formation of chromosomes and alterations in nuclear size (e.g. McDonald, 1999; Chwedorzewska et al., 2002a, b). Age-related DNA changes have been illustrated through the investigation of DNA profiles of differentially aged seeds of soybean (Glycine max) and safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) obtained using different DNA marker technologies (Vijay et al., 2009). These chromosomal changes affect the expression of genes essential for successful germination. Experiments with wheat and rye (Secale cereale) seeds have shown a negative correlation between telomere length and seed ageing (Bucholc and Buchowicz, 1992). Donà et al. (2013) also reported that dry and rehydrated seeds of Silene vulgaris and Silene acaulis exhibit significant differences in their average telomere length. The telomere length increased significantly upon rehydration, but decreased significantly when seeds of both species were subjected to artificial ageing. These findings point to the possibility of using telomere length as a reliable marker for seed ageing (Boubriak et al., 2007).

DNA damage in stored seeds can occur due to oxidative stress and needs to be repaired at the onset of imbibition for effective seed germination. Multiple DNA ligase genes and protein l-isoaspartyl methyltransferase (PIMT) are needed for DNA and protein repairs, respectively. In Arabidopsis, atlig6 single and atlig6 atlig4 double mutants exhibited significant hypersensitivity to controlled seed ageing and showed delayed germination and reduced viability when compared with the wild-type. These observations suggest that atlig6 is a major determinant of Arabidopsis seed quality and longevity (Waterworth et al., 2010). Altered expression levels of PIMT1 found in isolated Arabidopsis lines suggest that PIMT1 is a major endogenous factor that improves seed longevity and vigour (Ogé et al., 2008). It is likely that the PIMT repair pathway works in concert with other anti-ageing pathways to eliminate deleterious protein products actively.

Epigenetic regulation can affect gene expression in stored seeds by DNA methylation, histone modifications, histone variants and chromatin remodelling (Ahmad et al., 2010). Recently, Michalak et al. (2013) investigated the relationship between DNA methylation and desiccation in pear (Pyrus communis) seeds and seedlings and found that 1 year of seed storage induced a significant increase in the level of DNA methylation. This finding suggests that seed ageing may be coupled with increased DNA methylation. Also, several studies have shown that microRNA is involved in the germination process of Arabidopsis seeds (Martin et al., 2005, 2006; Liu et al., 2007; Reyes and Chua, 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Recently, Li et al. (2013) discovered a diverse set of maize microRNAs and their regulatory functions in dry and imbibed seeds. However, little is known about the role of non-coding RNA in seed deterioration.

Seed germination is controlled by co-ordinated activities of various biological pathways, which in turn are regulated by spontaneous and differential expression of several gene families. Therefore, a characterization of gene expression level, enzyme activity, difference in signal transduction response and regulatory mechanisms in stored seeds could yield useful ageing signals (Ventura et al., 2012). For example, genes involved in the glyoxylate cycle, sulfur amino acid pathway, starch mobilization pathway, ROS scavenging pathway, DNA and enzyme repair, and abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) signalling, may display differential expressions in stored seeds. The characterization of three genes (NnMT2a, NnMT2b and NnMT3) that encode metallothioneins (MT) from sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) revealed that they were overexpressed during germination and upregulated in response to high salinity and oxidative stresses (Zhou et al., 2012). Also, transgenic Arabidopsis seeds overexpressing NnMT2a and NnMT3 exhibited remarkably increased resistance to accelerated ageing treatment and abiotic stresses. Garza-Caligaris et al. (2012) reported that At3g08030 mRNA detection could serve as a molecular marker of seed ageing in a variety of plant species. However, much less attention has been paid to studying the role of stored mRNAs or long-lived mRNAs (Dure and Waters, 1965; Nakabayashi et al., 2005; Kimura and Nambara, 2010) in seed deterioration.

Biochemical signals

Biochemical changes associated with seed ageing include impairment of protein synthesis, protein inactivation, changes in enzyme activities, protein hydrolysis and post-translational modifications (Rajjou et al., 2012). Based on these signals, many biomarkers have been developed to assess seed development, vigour, viability and germination (see Table Table1).1). However, few studies have been conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these biomarkers in detecting ageing signals in different species and, consequently, they are rarely applied to assess seed ageing.

In aged seeds, the inability to synthesize proteins is associated with the loss of RNA synthesis ability (Bray and Dasgupta, 1976). However, protein synthesis can also be hampered at the translation level due to reduced activity of ribosomes as a consequence of severe structural modifications. Such modifications have been found in non-viable seeds (Roberts and Osborne, 1973). Proteins may also be structurally modified by non-enzymatic glycation through Amadori and Maillard reactions (Wettlaufer and Leopold, 1991). The non-enzymatic reactions are considered to be the most probable cause of protein inactivation during seed storage, because dry seeds lack active enzymatic metabolism. Previous studies suggest that Amadori and Maillard products were found in soybean (Glycine max) seeds subjected to accelerated ageing and formed most rapidly in seeds at high humidity (Wettlaufer and Leopold, 1991). Protein inactivation in stored seeds may occur from the gain or loss of certain functional groups, by oxidation of sulfhydryl groups or by conversion of amino acids within the protein structure. Protein damage, such as spontaneous deamidation, isomerization and racemization of normal l-aspartyl and l-asparaginyl forms to abnormal l-isoaspartyl and l-isoasparaginyl forms, was observed during cellular ageing (Galletti et al., 1995). The inactivation of proteins would depress the metabolic capacity and reduce the ability of biological systems to repair cellular damage occurring during storage. Free radicals can also cause changes in protein structure. Soluble proteins are more susceptible to free radicals than membrane proteins. Certain amino acids, such as cysteine, histidine, tryptophan, methionine and phenylalanine, listed in typical order of sensitivity, are more susceptible to oxidative damage (Larson, 1997).

The activities of proteins in stored seeds may be altered, which in turn may affect metabolic processes. Alterations in protein activity could arise from conformational changes, including partial folding or unfolding, dissociation to monomers or subunits, and condensation to polymers. Various alterations in protein structure and function affect the ability of seeds to germinate, because various hydrolytic enzymes, including lipase, phospholipase, protease, DNase, phosphatase and amylase, are required for successful germination (Basavarajappa et al., 1991). Likewise, the deleterious effects of ROS, which boost seed ageing and reduce seed viability, are also neutralized by the enzymatic antioxidative system, which consists of superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate and glutathione reductase (Bailly, 2004). Various processes of post-translational modifications have been reported, including redox signalling, phosphorylation/dephosphorylation and nitrosylation. The roles of protein biotinylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, farnesylation and acetylation in germination have also been demonstrated experimentally (Arc et al., 2011). All of these post-translational modifications play crucial roles during germination by directly affecting the activities of various proteins and also by controlling the cascade of signal transduction between different components of a pathway. For example, a set of protein kinases and protein phosphatases has been shown to be involved in the control of germination through the modulation of ABA signalling by a regulatory mechanism of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation (Brock et al., 2010; Hubbard et al., 2010).

Accelerated ageing in pea seeds reduced seed viability, and this viability reduction was correlated with a substantial decrease in the transcriptional activation of prominent antioxidative genes (Yao et al., 2012). Oxidative stress, due to an increase in lipid peroxidation and a decrease in the activities of antioxidative enzymes, is considered to play a critical role in seed ageing in various plant species (Bailly, 2004). In sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds, for example, the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), lipid peroxidation and a decreased activity of antioxidant enzymes were considered to be associated with loss of viability during accelerated ageing (Kibinza et al., 2006). Catusse et al. (2011) demonstrated the utility of proteomics in developing biomarkers of seed vigour in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). However, many biomarkers based on biochemical signals were developed in controlled hot and humid ageing conditions (Table (Table1)1) and are not widely tested for their effectiveness in long-term cool storage conditions.

Physiological signals

Extensive research has been carried out to determine the association of seed ageing with many physiological processes (e.g. the reviews of McDonald, 1999; Ventura et al., 2012; Diaz-Vivancos et al., 2013). Physiological changes include lipid peroxidation, increase in ROS, imbalance in growth-regulating enzymes, impairment of metabolic transition, imbalance in growth-regulating hormones, loss of cytoplasmic glassy state, disruption of cellular membranes, and PCD. However, these physiological processes are significantly influenced by the seed moisture content and storage conditions. For example, lipid peroxidation, either autoxidation or enzymatic oxidation (lipoxygenases), is strongly influenced by moisture content. At lower seed moisture content (<6%), autoxidation is the primary cause of seed deterioration, while enzymatic oxidation increases when seed moisture content exceeds 14% for some species (Priestley et al., 1985). During oxidation, free radicals are produced, and these radicals react with various cellular components and cause damage to cellular organization (Diaz-Vivancos et al., 2013). Free radicals disrupt the cellular membrane, which causes movement of organic and inorganic solvents across the membrane, resulting in an imbalance, which leads to seed deterioration. Free radicals also disrupt genetic and enzymatic integrity, thus limiting the efficiencies of transcriptional and translational machineries. These observations suggest that various physiological processes are interdependent and, once the malfunctioning of one process starts, it triggers other events.

Early studies have established that the cytoplasm of a dry seed enters a vitreous or glassy state at a transitional moisture content that depends on temperature (Williams and Leopold, 1989; Maki et al., 1994). In a glassy state, the cytoplasm is so viscous that diffusional movement and many deterioration reactions are arrested (Williams and Leopold, 1989; Leopold et al., 1992). The acquisition of a glassy state depends upon moisture content, temperature and the amount of various sugars, such as sucrose, raffinose, stachyose and verbascose. Any physiological change that affects seed glassy state will lead to seed deterioration (Osborne, 2000). Recently, Walters et al. (2010) applied mechanical analysis techniques to the study of seed structure and transitions associated with changes in temperature and moisture and argued that relationships between seed structural properties and longevity would provide the necessary tool to predict seed ageing.

Programmed cell death is a fundamental cellular process in plants and is involved in defence, development and response to stress (e.g. Reape and McCabe, 2008). The early studies of the role of PCD in seed viability were largely based on the observation of cereal seed germination coupled with aleurone autolysis. Plant hormones, particularly GA and ABA, were found to regulate this process tightly, and ABA is thought to slow down PCD (Fath et al., 2000). Several other reports also described the involvement of PCD in seed ageing (El-Maarouf-Bouteau et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2012). It is also believed that ROS trigger the primary events of PCD (Kranner et al., 2010a). Whether ROS-triggered PCD participates in the loss of seed viability during seed storage is largely unknown.

Metabolic signals

Many metabolic studies have been pursued to determine the role of metabolism in seed development and germination (Rajjou et al., 2012), but rarely in seed ageing per se (Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, 1992). Some research has been carried out to analyse metabolic changes in seeds through stress imaging techniques (e.g. Qiao et al., 2005) and to develop biomarkers based on metabolic changes in seeds (Table (Table1).1). Nevertheless, we still are far from understanding the metabolic changes during seed ageing (Shin et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011). To facilitate the search for useful metabolic shifts in seeds stored over time, we highlight some advances in metabolic research below.

The transition from reserve accumulation to seed desiccation in Arabidopsis seeds is associated with a major metabolic shift, resulting in the accumulation of various sugars, nitrogen-rich amino acids, organic acids and other metabolites (Fait et al., 2006). However, seed priming is associated with decreased contents of several of these metabolic intermediates, reinforcing the idea that metabolic reorganization is required for seed germination. Likewise, the levels of other metabolites increase significantly during seed priming and are further elevated during germination (Rajjou et al., 2012). The close resemblance of gene expression patterns and metabolic signatures between the seed desiccation process at the time of maturity and seed germination implies that the preparation of seeds for germination begins during desiccation (Fait et al., 2006; Angelovici et al., 2010).

Among the essential amino acids synthesized by plants, methionine (Met) is a fundamental metabolite, which functions not only as a building block for protein synthesis but also as a precursor of polyamines, ethylene, biotin and other metabolites (Ravanel et al., 2008; Takahashi et al., 2011). During Arabidopsis seed germination, various enzymes involved in Met biosynthesis showed differential expression. Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthetase is highly expressed at the stage of radicle protrusion to synthesize AdoMet, an intermediate during Met synthesis (Gallardo et al., 2001, 2002a, b; Bassel et al., 2008). Similar results were also reported in different plant species, such as tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Fulnecˇek et al., 2011). Adenosylmethionine regulates a myriad of transmethylation reactions in plant cells, each of which is catalysed by a specific AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase, such as the repair methyltransferase, PIMT, mentioned earlier. Other AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases influence hormone signalling and homeostasis in plant tissues (Sawicki and Willows, 2010). Likewise, the requirement of biotin for seed germination was also reported in Arabidopsis (Hwang et al., 2010). Along with Met, other amino acids, such as cysteine (Cys) and lysine, and other compounds, such as biotin, ethylene and folate, can also play a major role in seed germination. For example, Cys is the precursor of the major antioxidant molecule glutathione, which is involved in several other processes required for successful seed germination (Bonsager et al., 2010). In dry pea seeds, the folate pool is present in very low concentration and increases considerably during germination (Jabrin et al., 2003). However, little is known about whether these metabolic processes and products during germination are associated with any ageing processes and/or conditions of stored seeds before germination.

It is possible to characterize major metabolic shifts in seeds stored over time for the development of useful biomarkers (Bernal-Lugo and Leopold, 1992; Shin et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011). A good example is the exploratory research on the half-cell reduction potentials of low molecular weight thiols, cysteine, cysteinyl-glycine and γ-glutamyl-cysteine as biomarkers for seed ageing (Kranner et al., 2006; Birtic et al., 2011). More research is needed to search for informative biomarkers from metabolic profiling in stored seeds (Wu et al., 2011).

Mitochondrial signals

In seeds, the mitochondrion is the major organelle for energy supply, and its function is tightly coupled to many other cellular processes associated with seed germination, such as cell signalling, cell differentiation, cell death and cell proliferation (Bewley, 1997). Mitochondria are one of the targets for various forms of stress damage, probably due to the large turnover of ROS (Møller, 2001; Amirsadeghi et al., 2007; Macherel et al., 2007; Møller et al., 2007; Pastore et al., 2007). Reactive oxygen species have many deleterious effects on mitochondrial membranes, leading to release of cytochrome c into the cytosol to activate apoptotic cell death. Likewise, the mitochondrial DNA is more susceptible to ROS damage, because it lacks any protective membrane, and no histone proteins are associated with it. Damage to mitochondrial DNA can lead to dysfunction of mitochondria, which is considered to be a major component of seed ageing during prolonged storage. In animals, mitochondrial alterations are considered to be involved in, and possibly responsible for, regular or programmed cell death (Bras et al., 2005). They are often considered to be a central mechanism driving mammalian ageing (Kujoth et al., 2005).

Some research has revealed that energy metabolism and membrane integrity in mitochondria are closely associated with seed ageing (Benamar et al., 2003; Lo et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012). One study (Lo et al., 2011) further reasoned that mitochondrial actin may be involved in mitochondrial DNA segregation and mitochondrial division. Law et al. (2012) suggested that the mitochondrial transition from a dormant to an active metabolic state was punctuated by an early molecular switch, characterized by a transient burst in the expression of genes encoding mitochondrial proteins. In artificially aged sunflower seeds with varying moisture contents, El-Maarouf-Bouteau et al. (2011) demonstrated that the effect of ageing on energy metabolism was related to moisture content, and mitochondrial dysfunction in aged seeds may be associated with the high moisture content. Recently, Wang et al. (2012) developed a method to monitor the structural alteration in mitochondrial membranes due to seed ageing, based on the early observation that mitochondrial alteration is associated with the damage or recovery of mitochondrial outer and inner membranes. However, insufficient studies have been carried out to characterize mitochondrial dysfunction under long-term storage and their associations with seed storage factors.

Integrating ageing signals for prediction of viability

Reviewing detectable ageing signals carries the hope that these signals can be used as seed viability biomarkers for prediction of viability loss over storage time, as illustrated in Fig. Fig.1.1. It is clear that these ageing signals, even classified non-exclusively into five groups, are complex and interconnected. Some of these signals have been used to develop biomarkers (see Table Table1),1), but no reports have been found so far on the use of these biomarkers for prediction of seed viability. This may reflect the fact that little effort has been made into the development and utilization of such viability prediction tools, and challenges exist in utilization of these ageing signals for prediction of viability.

Figure 1:
Illustration of complex and interconnected ageing signals and their potential use as viability biomarkers for early predictions of seed viability loss over storage time. A continuous or dashed line represents known or assumed relationships among ageing ...

The ideal monitoring tool for a genebank should provide an overall assessment of seed ageing status for a seed lot, such as generated by a germination test, allowing decisions to be made regarding the necessity of seed regeneration (Roberts, 1973; Ellis et al., 1985). An informative viability biomarker should allow for identification and quantification of seeds with viability loss through a bioassay of a seed lot. Thus, more effort is needed to develop such biomarkers from various ageing signals, with empirical validation of their ability to predict viability with traditional germination tests. However, given the complexity of these ageing signals, it is difficult to develop individual biomarkers capable of identifying clear-cut fingerprints of different ageing stages. Some signals may vary for different species even in the same storage conditions (Priestley, 1986; Probert et al., 2009), and related biomarkers may not always be effective. Some biomarkers were developed in controlled, not storage, ageing conditions, and their effectiveness in use for prediction of viability may vary with respect to ageing conditions. Different biomarkers developed from different signals may have variable weights in viability prediction. Thus, an integrative approach to using global ageing signals through multivariate modelling for viability prediction should be explored.

Our motivation to argue for a biomarker-based prediction of seed viability loss (Fig. (Fig.1)1) is based on the reasoning that biomarkers, such as genome alternations or telomere lengths, if available, should carry more accurate ageing information and are experimentally more reproducible, particularly for those genetically diverse seed collections of complex ageing kinetics (Walters, 1998), than traditional germination tests or other methods. Thus, the use of viability biomarkers can, at least theoretically, contribute to more accurate estimation of seed viability distribution spread (or standard deviation; σp) for given storage conditions (Fig. (Fig.1)1) and, consequently, more accurate prediction of seed viability loss (Ellis et al., 1985; Walters et al., 2005). However, whether such a biomarker-based approach is cost effective and if it can address other challenges currently faced with seed viability predictions (Pritchard and Dickie, 2003; Walters et al., 2005) remains to be seen. Among those challenges is the early biomarker-based projection of seed longevity for a seed collection in given storage conditions for the beneficial timing of seed regeneration.

Perspectives for viability prediction tools

Our review, although not exhaustive, shows that many tools are available for assessing seed deterioration. However, no comprehensive research has been done to evaluate, compare and standardize these tools and to make recommendations for use in ex situ genebanks. Clearly, further research is needed to assess the effectiveness and applicability of existing tools in genebank operations. More importantly, more efforts should be directed towards the development of advanced viability prediction tools for assessing seed ageing under ex situ storage.

The exciting fact obtained from this review is that many opportunities exist for the exploration and development of more accurate tools for monitoring seed ageing under ex situ seed conservation. Several interesting ageing signals have emerged from this literature search. They are the changes reflected in ROS and mitochondrial triggered PCDs, expression of antioxidative genes and DNA and protein repair genes, seed telomere lengths, epigenetic regulation of related genes (microRNA and methylation), and altered organelle and nuclear genomes. Although challenges exist in the use of ageing signals for viability prediction, as discussed above, it is our hope that these ageing signals should be better explored and used as biomarkers to play a role in seed viability monitoring for ex situ seed conservation.

Here, we promote two lines of research with great potential to take advantage of recent developments in next generation sequencing, calorimetry and imaging technologies. Recent advances in next generation sequencing technologies have made the acquisition of global ageing signals through genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic or metabolic analyses feasible and practical (Le et al., 2007; Rajjou et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2013), and new sensitive and effective biomarkers can be developed to identify ageing signals and assess ageing status (Koboldt et al., 2013; Nagel et al., 2015). Much could be learnt from next generation sequencing as applied to the development of biomarkers for human diseases (e.g. Schwarzenbach et al., 2011; Krock et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014). Among next generation sequencing applications, searching for ageing signals from related DNA alteration or mitochondrial dysfunction may be fruitful and informative (Chen et al., 2013), because these processes or molecules may be critical to seed ageing and/or represent the fingerprints of seed deterioration. Specific effort may be made on the genomic analysis of mitochondrial dysfunction, transcriptome alteration, microRNA expression alteration and abnormal methylations in response to different seed storage conditions present in genebanks. More focus should be placed on how variable ageing signals are integrated into a predictive tool for an overall ageing assessment of a seed lot (Ellis and Roberts, 1980; Walters et al., 2005).

The non-destructive or non-invasive analyses of stored seeds through microcalorimetry and/or stress imaging techniques may also hold the potential to provide new methods for assessment of seed ageing. Studies using microcalorimetry (Criddle et al., 1991; Wadso, 2000) have shown that metabolic heat flows can be used to assess gross metabolism associated with germination processes and have demonstrated the potential of extracting ageing signals (Prat, 1952; Mourik and Bakri, 1991; Hageseth and Cody, 1993; Sigstad and Prado, 1999; Edelstein et al., 2001; Qiao et al., 2005; Hay et al., 2006). Some studies have demonstrated good potential, such as the applications of isothermal microcalorimetry to predict seed longevity in R. sceleratus (Hay et al., 2006), the image reconstruction technique to estimate pepper seed viability (Kim et al., 2014) and mechanical analysis techniques to quantify differences among seed structures associated with ageing (Walters et al., 2010). More research is needed to assess the accuracy of prediction of viability for seeds of different species under long-term storage (Walters et al., 2005; Hay and Probert, 2013). The prediction tools developed should be tested for their effectiveness and applicability in genebank operations (FAO, 2014).

Nonetheless, the traditional germination test will continue to play a central role in seed viability monitoring. With advances in new technologies for detecting ageing signals, however, it is possible to explore and develop innovative viability prediction tools that are more accurate, sensitive, quick and cost effective (Kocsy, 2015). By combining all of these approaches, seed viability under storage can be monitored better for long-term management and conservation of ex situ seed germplasm.

Concluding remarks

Seed ageing is a complex biological trait and difficult to monitor. This review summarizes the recent development of tools for assessing seed ageing and reveals several biological signals that could be used to assess seed deterioration. Two lines of research are promoted that have great potential to take advantage of recent developments in next generation sequencing, calorimetry and imaging technologies for the development of biomarker-based seed viability prediction tools. These research efforts will provide useful methods to supplement traditional germination tests, enhancing the monitoring of seed deterioration for long-term conservation of ex situ seed germplasm.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Yan Zhang, Hui Yang and Gregory Peterson for their assistance with the literature search and Hong Wang, Daniel Perry, Ming Li Wang, Christopher Richards and three journal reviewers (including Hugh W. Pritchard) for their helpful comments on the earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by an A-Base research project (no. 1148) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

References

  • Agelet LE, Ellis DD, Duvick S, Goggi AJS, Hurburgh CR. (2012) Feasibility of near infra-red spectroscopy for analyzing corn kernel damage and viability of soybean and corn kernels. J Cereal Sci 55: 160–165.
  • Ahmad A, Zhang Y, Cao XF. (2010) Decoding the epigenetic language of plant development. Mol Plant 3: 719–728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Amirsadeghi S, Robson CA, Vanlerberghe GC. (2007) The role of the mitochondrion in plant responses to biotic stress. Plant Physiol 129: 253–266.
  • Angelovici R, Galili G, Fernie AR, Fait A. (2010) Seed desiccation: a bridge between maturation and germination. Trends Plant Sci 15: 211–218. [PubMed]
  • Arc E, Galland M, Cueff G, Godin B, Lounifi I, Job D, Rajjou L. (2011) Reboot the system thanks to protein post-translational modifications and proteome diversity: how quiescent seeds restart their metabolism to prepare seedling establishment. Proteomics 11: 1606–1618. [PubMed]
  • Arif MAR, Nagel M, Neumann K, Kobiljski B, Lohwasser U. (2012) Genetic studies of seed longevity in hexaploid wheat using segregation and association mapping approaches. Euphytica 186: 1–13.
  • Atienzar FA, Jha AN. (2006) The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay and related techniques applied to genotoxicity and carcinogenesis studies: a critical review. Mutat Res 613: 76–102. [PubMed]
  • Bailly C. (2004) Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Sci Res 14: 93–107.
  • Basavarajappa BS, Shetty HS, Prakash HS. (1991) Membrane deterioration and other biochemical changes associated with accelerated ageing of maize seeds. Seed Sci Technol 19: 279–286.
  • Bassel GW, Fung P, Chow TFF, Foong JA, Provart NJ, Cutler SR. (2008) Elucidating the germination transcriptional program using small molecules. Plant Physiol 147: 143–155. [PubMed]
  • Bassel GW, Glaab E, Marquez J, Holdsworth MJ, Bacardit J. (2011) Functional network construction in Arabidopsis using rule-based machine learning on large-scale data sets. Plant Cell 23: 3101–3116. [PubMed]
  • Baur E. (1914) Die Bedeutung der primitiven Kulturrassen und der wilden Verwandten unserer Kulturpflanzen für die Pflanzenzüchtung. Jahrbuch DLG 29: 104–109.
  • Bednarek PT, Chwdorzewska K, Puchalski J. (1998) Preliminary molecular studies on genetic changes in rye seeds due to long-term storage and regeneration. In Gass T, Podyma W, Puchalski J, Eberhart SA, editors. eds, Challenges in Rye Germplasm Conservation. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp 54–61.
  • Benamar A, Tallon C, Macherel D. (2003) Membrane integrity and oxidative properties of mitochondria isolated from imbibing pea seeds after priming or accelerated ageing. Seed Sci Res 13: 35–45.
  • Bentsink L, Jowett J, Hanhart CJ, Koornneef M. (2006) Cloning of DOG1, a quantitative trait locus controlling seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17042–17047. [PubMed]
  • Bernal-Lugo I, Leopold AC. (1992) Changes in soluble carbohydrates during seed storage. Plant Physiol 98: 1207–1210. [PubMed]
  • Bewley JD. (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9: 1055–1066. [PubMed]
  • Birtic S, Colville L, Pritchard HW, Pearce SR, Kranner I. (2011) Mathematically combined half-cell reduction potentials of the low-molecular-weight thiols as markers of seed aging. Free Radic Res 45: 1093–1102. [PubMed]
  • Bonsager BC, Shahpiri A, Finnie C, Svensson B. (2010) Proteomic and activity profiles of ascorbate–glutathione cycle enzymes in germinating barley embryo. Phytochemistry 71: 1650–1656. [PubMed]
  • Boubriak I, Polischuk V, Grodzinsky A, Osborne DJ. (2007) Telomeres and seed banks. Cytol Genet 41: 18–24. [PubMed]
  • Bove J, Jullien M, Grappin P. (2001) Functional genomics in the study of seed germination. Genome Biol 3: 1002.1–1002.5.
  • Bras M, Queenan B, Susin SA. (2005) Programmed cell death via mitochondria: different modes of dying. Biochemistry 70: 231–239. [PubMed]
  • Bräutigam A, Gowik U. (2010) What can next generation sequencing do for you? Next generation sequencing as a valuable tool in plant research. Plant Biol 12: 831–841. [PubMed]
  • Bray CM, Dasgupta J. (1976) Ribonucleic acid synthesis and loss of viability in pea seed. Planta 132: 103–108. [PubMed]
  • Brock AK, Willmann R, Kolb D, Grefen L, Lajunen HM, Bethke G, Lee J, Nürnberger T, Gust AA. (2010) The Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase PP2C5 affects seed germination, stomatal aperture, and abscisic acid-inducible gene expression. Plant Physiol 153: 1098–1111. [PubMed]
  • Buchanan BB, Balmer Y. (2005) Redox regulation: a broadening horizon. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 187–220. [PubMed]
  • Bucholc M, Buchowicz J. (1992) Synthesis and extra chromosomal DNA and telomere-related sequences in germinating wheat embryos. Seed Sci Res 2: 141–144.
  • Catusse J, Meinhard J, Job C, Strub JM, Fischer U, Pestsova E, Westhoff P, Dorsselaer AV, Job D. (2011) Proteomics reveals potential biomarkers of seed vigor in sugarbeet. Proteomics 11: 1569–1580. [PubMed]
  • Chaudhury AM, Koltunow A, Payne T, Luo M, Tucker MR, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. (2001) Control of early seed development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17: 677–699. [PubMed]
  • Cheah KSE, Osborne DJ. (1978) DNA lesions occur with loss of viability in embryos of ageing rye seeds. Nature 272: 593–599. [PubMed]
  • Chen H, Osuna D, Colville L, Lorenzo O, Graeber K, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. (2013) Transcriptome-wide mapping of pea seed ageing reveals a pivotal role for genes related to oxidative stress and programmed cell death. PLoS ONE 10: e78471. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chwedorzewska KJ, Bednarek PT, Puchalski J. (2002a) AFLP-profiling of long-term stored and regenerated rye gene bank samples. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7: 457–463. [PubMed]
  • Chwedorzewska KJ, Bednarek PT, Puchalski J. (2002b) Studies on changes in specific rye genome regions due to seed aging and regeneration. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7: 569–576. [PubMed]
  • Clerkx EJM, Vries HBD, Ruys GJ, Groot SPC, Koornneef M. (2004) Genetic differences in seed longevity of various Arabidopsis mutants. Plant Physiol 121: 448–461.
  • Colville L, Bradley EL, Lloyd AS, Pritchard HW, Castle L, Kranner I. (2012) Volatile fingerprints of seeds of four species indicate the involvement of alcoholic fermentation, lipid peroxidation, and Maillard reactions in seed deterioration during ageing and desiccation stress. J Exp Bot 63: 6519–6530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Coolbear P. (1995) Mechanism of seed deterioration. In Basra AS, editor. , ed, Seed Quality: Basic Mechanisms and Agricultural Implications. Food Product Press, New York, pp 223–277.
  • Copeland LO, McDonald MB. (1995) Principles of Seed Science and Technology, Ed 3 Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 59–110.
  • Corbineau F. (2012) Markers of seed quality: from present to future. Seed Sci Res 22: 61–68.
  • Corvalan C, Hales S, McMichael A. (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, pp 86.
  • Crane J, Walters C. (2009) Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool for nondestructive measurements of seed deterioration in lettuce (Lactuca sativa, CV “Black Seeded Simpson”). Seed Technol Newsl 83: 21–22.
  • Criddle RS, Fontana AJ, Rank DR, Paige D, Hansen LD, Breidenbach RW. (1991) Simultaneous measurement of metabolic heat rate, CO2 production and O2 consumption by microcalorimetry. Anal Biochem 194: 413–417. [PubMed]
  • Debeaujon I, Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. (2000) Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 122: 403–414. [PubMed]
  • Delouche JC, Baskin CC. (1973) Accelerated aging techniques for predicting the relative storability of seed lots. Seed Sci Technol 1: 427–452.
  • Devaiah SP, Pan XQ, Hong YY, Roth M, Welti R, Wang X. (2007) Enhancing seed quality and viability by suppressing phospholipase D in Arabidopsis. Plant J 50: 950–957. [PubMed]
  • Diaz-Vivancos P, Barba-Espín G, Hernandez JA. (2013) Elucidating hormonal/ROS networks during seed germination: insights and perspectives. Plant Cell Rep 32: 1491–1502. [PubMed]
  • Dinkova TD, Marquez-Velazquez NA, Aguilar R, Lazaro-Mixteco PE, de Jimenez ES. (2011) Tight translational control by the initiation factors eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E is required for maize seed germination. Seed Sci Res 21: 85–93.
  • Donà M, Balestrazzi A, Mondoni A, Rossi G, Ventura L, Buttafava A, Macovei A, Sabatini ME, Valassi A, Carbonera D. (2013) DNA profiling, telomere analysis and antioxidant properties as tools for monitoring ex situ seed longevity. Ann Bot 111: 987–998. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dure L, Waters L. (1965) Long-lived messenger RNA: evidence from cotton seed germination. Science 147: 410–412. [PubMed]
  • Duval M, Job C, Alban C, Douce R, Job D. (1994) Developmental patterns of free and protein-bound biotin during maturation and germination of seeds of Pisum sativum: characterization of a novel seed specific biotinylated protein. Biochem J 299: 141–150. [PubMed]
  • Edelstein M, Bradford KJ, Burger DW. (2001) Metabolic heat and CO2 production rates during germination of melon (Cucumis melo L.) seeds measured by microcalorimetry. Seed Sci Res 11: 265–272.
  • Ellis RH, Roberts EH. (1980) Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann Bot 45: 13–30.
  • Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH. (1985) Handbook of Seed Technology for Genebanks Volume I. Principles and Methodology. Handbooks for Genebanks No. 2. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.
  • El-Maarouf-Bouteau H, Mazuy C, Corbineau F, Bailly C. (2011) DNA alteration and programmed cell death during ageing of sunflower seed. J Exp Bot 62: 5003–5011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Engels JMM, Visser L. (2003) A Guide to Effective Management of Germplasm Collections. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
  • Fait A, Angelovici R, Less H, Ohad I, Urbanczyk-Wochniak E, Fernie AR, Galili G. (2006) Arabidopsis seed development and germination is associated with temporally distinct metabolic switches. Plant Physiol 142: 839–854. [PubMed]
  • FAO (2010) The second report on the state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome.
  • FAO (2014) Genebank standards for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3704e.pdf.
  • Fath A, Bethke P, Lonsdale J, Meza-Romero R, Jones R. (2000) Programmed cell death in cereal aleurone. Plant Mol Biol 44: 255–266. [PubMed]
  • Frankel O, Bennett E. (1970) Genetic Resources in Plants—Their Exploration and Conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 115–129.
  • Fulneček J, Matyášek R, Votruba I, Holý A, Křížova K, Kovařík A. (2011) Inhibition of SAH-hydrolase activity during seed germination leads to deregulation of flowering genes and altered flower morphology in tobacco. Mol Genet Genomics 285: 225–236. [PubMed]
  • Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D. (2001) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming. Plant Physiol 126: 835–848. [PubMed]
  • Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D. (2002a) Importance of methionine biosynthesis for Arabidopsis seed germination and seedling growth. Physiol Plantarum 116: 238–247. [PubMed]
  • Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D. (2002b) Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed germination: a comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol 129: 823–837. [PubMed]
  • Galletti P, Ingrosso D, Manna C, Clemente G, Zappia V. (1995) Protein damage and methylation-mediated repair in the erythrocytes. Biochem J 306: 313–325. [PubMed]
  • Garza-Caligaris LE, Avendano-Vazquez AO, Alvarado-Lopez S, Zuniga-Sanchez E, Orozco-Segovia A, Pérez-Ruíz RV, Gamboa-deBuen A. (2012) At3g08030 transcript: a molecular marker of seed ageing. Ann Bot 110: 1253–1260. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gurusinghe S, Powell ALT, Bradford KJ. (2002) Enhanced expression of BiP is associated with treatments that extend storage longevity of primed tomato seeds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127: 528–534.
  • Hageseth GT, Cody AL. (1993) Energy-level model for isothermal seed germination. J Exp Bot 44: 119–125.
  • Hailstones MD, Smith MT. (1989) Thermally-derived volatile aldehydes in relation to seed viability in soybean seeds. Seed Sci Technol 17: 649–658.
  • Han Z, Ku L, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Guo S, Liu H, Zhao R, Ren Z, Zhang L, Su H, et al. (2014) QTLs for seed vigor-related traits identified in maize seeds germinated under artificial aging conditions. PLoS ONE 9: e92535. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Harlan HV, Martini ML. (1936) Problems and results in barley breeding. In Bressman ES, editor. ed, Yearbook of Agriculture. USDA, Washington, DC, pp 303–346.
  • Hay FR, Probert RJ. (2013) Advances in seed conservation of wild plant species: a review of recent research. Conserv Physiol 1: doi:10.1093/conphys/cot030. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hay FR, O’Neill MAA, Beezer AE, Gaisford S. (2006) Isothermal micro-calorimetry: a tool to predict seed longevity? Seed Sci Res 16: 89–96.
  • Holman TJ, Jones PD, Russell L, Medhurst A, Tomas SU, Tallojie P, Marquez J, Schmuths H, Tung SA, Taylor I, et al. (2009) The N-end rule pathway promotes seed germination and establishment through removal of ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4549–4554. [PubMed]
  • Hu D, Ma G, Wang Q, Yao J, Wang Y, Pritchard HW, Wang X. (2012) Spatial and temporal nature of reactive oxygen species production and programmed cell death in elm (Ulmus pumila L.) seeds during controlled deterioration. Plant Cell Environ 35: 2045–2059. [PubMed]
  • Hubbard KE, Nishimura N, Hitomi K, Getzoff ED, Schroeder JI. (2010) Early abscisic acid signal transduction mechanisms: newly discovered components and newly emerging questions. Genes Dev 24: 1695–1708. [PubMed]
  • Hunt L, Holdsworth MJ, Gray JE. (2007) Nicotinamidase activity is important for germination. Plant J 51: 341–351. [PubMed]
  • Hwang I, Choi JS, Song HY, Cho SJ, Lim HK, Park NJ, Lee DH. (2010) Validation of 7-keto-8-aminopelargonic acid synthase as a potential herbicide target with lead compound triphenyltin acetate. Pestic Biochem Physiol 97: 24–31.
  • Ishimwe R, Abutaleb K, Ahmed F. (2014) Applications of thermal imaging in agriculture: a review. Adv Rem Sens 3: 128–140.
  • ISTA (2005) International Rules for Seed Testing. ISTA Secretariat, Zurich.
  • Jabrin S, Ravanel S, Gambonnet B, Douce R, Rebeille F. (2003) One-carbon metabolism in plants: regulation of tetrahydrofolate synthesis during germination and seedling development. Plant Physiol 131: 1431–1439. [PubMed]
  • Kepczynski J, Kepczynska E. (1997) Ethylene in seed dormancy and germination. Plant Physiol 10: 720–726.
  • Kibinza S, Vinel D, Côme D, Bailly C, Corbineau F. (2006) Sunflower seed deterioration as related to moisture content during ageing, energy metabolism and active oxygen species scavenging. Plant Physiol 128: 496–506.
  • Kim G, Kim G-H, Lohumi S, Kang J-S, Cho B-K. (2014) Viability estimation of pepper seeds using time-resolved photothermal signal characterization. Infrared Phys Techn 67: 214–221.
  • Kim JY, Lee HJ, Jung HJ, Maruyama K, Suzuki N, Kang H. (2010) Overexpression of microRNA395c or 395e affects differently the seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana under stress conditions. Planta 232: 1447–1454. [PubMed]
  • Kimura M, Nambara E. (2010) Stored and neosynthesized mRNA in Arabidopsis seeds: effects of cycloheximide and controlled deterioration treatment on the resumption of transcription during imbibition. Plant Mol Biol 73: 119–129. [PubMed]
  • Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. (2013) The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell 155: 27–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kocsy G. (2015) Die or survive? Redox changes as seed viability markers. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1008–1010. [PubMed]
  • Kranner I, Birtić S, Anderson KM, Pritchard HW. (2006) Glutathione half-cell reduction potential: a universal stress marker and modulator of programmed cell death? Free Radic Biol Med 40: 2155–2165. [PubMed]
  • Kranner I, Minibayeva FV, Beckett RP, Seal CE. (2010a) What is stress? Concepts, definitions and applications in seed science. New Phytol 188: 655–673. [PubMed]
  • Kranner I, Kastberger G, Hartbauer M, Pritchard HW. (2010b) Non-invasive diagnosis of seed viability using infrared thermography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 3912–3917. [PubMed]
  • Krock BL, Mao R, Best DH, Lyon E. (2014) Genomic applications in inherited genetic disorders. In Netto GJ, Schrijver I, editors. , eds, Genomic Applications in Pathology. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, pp 535–551.
  • Kujoth GC, Hiona A, Pugh TD, Someya S, Panzer K. (2005) Mitochondrial DNA mutations, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in mammalian aging. Science 309: 481–484. [PubMed]
  • Kushiro T, Okamoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yamagishi K, Kitamura S, Asami T, Hirai N, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Nam E. (2004) The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylases: key enzymes in ABA catabolism. EMBO J 23: 1647–1656. [PubMed]
  • Larson RA. (1997) Naturally Occurring Antioxidants. Lewis Publication, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–15.
  • Law SR, Narsai R, Nicolas R, Taylor L, Delannoy E, Carrie C, Giraud E, Millar AH, Small I, Whelan J. (2012) Nucleotide and RNA metabolism prime translational initiation in the earliest events of mitochondrial biogenesis during Arabidopsis germination . Plant Physiol 158: 1610–1627. [PubMed]
  • Le BH, Wagmaister JA, Kawashima T, Bui AQ, Harada JJ. (2007) Using genomics to study legume seed development. Plant Physiol 144: 562–574. [PubMed]
  • Leopold AC, Bruni F, Williams RJ. (1992) Water in dry organisms. In Somero GN, editor. , ed., Water and Life. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 161–169.
  • Li DZ, Pritchard HW. (2009) The science and economics of ex situ plant conservation. Trends Plant Sci 14: 614–621. [PubMed]
  • Li D, Wang L, Liu X, Cui D, Chen T, Zhang H, Zhang H, Jiang C, Xu C, Li P, et al. (2013) Deep sequencing of maize small RNAs reveals a diverse set of microRNA in dry and imbibed seeds. PLoS ONE 8: e55107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li JK, Zhang Y, Yu ZL, Wang YJ, Yang Y, Liu Z, Jiang JY, Song M, Wu YJ. (2007) Superior storage stability in low lipoxygenases maize varieties. J Stored Prod Res 43: 530–534.
  • Linkies A, Graeber K, Knight C, Leubner-Metzger G. (2010) The evolution of seeds. New Phytol 86: 817–831. [PubMed]
  • Liu PP, Montgomery TA, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Nonogaki H, Carrington JC. (2007) Repression of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR10 by microRNA160 is critical for seed germination and post-germination stages. Plant J 52: 133–146. [PubMed]
  • Liu W, Li PJ, Qi XM, Zhou QX, Zheng L. (2005) DNA changes in barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings induced by cadmium pollution using RAPD analysis. Chemosphere 61: 158–167. [PubMed]
  • Lo YS, Cheng N, Hsiao LJ, Annamalai A, Jauh GY, Wen TN, Dai H, Chiang KS. (2011) Actin in mung bean mitochondria and implications for its function. Plant Cell 23: 3727–3744. [PubMed]
  • McDonald MB. (1999) Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Sci Technol 27: 177–237.
  • Macherel D, Benamar A, Avelange-Macherel MH, Tolleter D. (2007) Function and stress tolerance of seed mitochondria. Plant Physiol 129: 233–241.
  • Macovei A, Balestrazzi A, Confalonieri M, Faé M, Carbonera D. (2011) New insights on the barrel medic MtOGG1 and MtFPG functions in relation to oxidative stress response in planta and during seed imbibition. Plant Physiol Biochem 49: 1040–1050. [PubMed]
  • Maki KS, Bartsch JA, Pitt RE, Leopold AC. (1994) Viscoelastic properties and the glassy state in soybeans. Seed Sci Res 4: 27–32.
  • Martin RC, Liu PP, Nonogaki H. (2005) Simple purification of small RNAs from seeds and efficient detection of multiple microRNAs expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds. Seed Sci Res 15: 319–328.
  • Martin RC, Liu PP, Nonogaki H. (2006) microRNAs in seeds: modified detection techniques and potential applications. Can J Bot 84: 189–198.
  • Metzker ML. (2010) Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 11: 31–46. [PubMed]
  • Michalak M, Barciszewska MZ, Barciszewski J, Plitta BP, Chmielarz P. (2013) Global changes in DNA methylation in seeds and seedlings of Pyrus communis after seed desiccation and storage. PLoS ONE 8: e70693. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Min TG, Kang WS. (2011) Simple, quick and nondestructive method for Brassicaceae seed viability measurement with single seed base using resazurin. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 52: 240–245.
  • Mira S, González-Benito ME, Hill LM, Walters C. (2010) Characterization of volatile production during storage of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seed. J Exp Bot 61: 3915–3924. [PubMed]
  • Møller IM. (2001) Plant mitochondria and oxidative stress: electron transport, NADPH turnover and metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52: 561–591. [PubMed]
  • Møller IM, Jensen PE, Hansson A. (2007) Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 459–481. [PubMed]
  • Mourik J, Bakri A. (1991) Application of microcalorimetry to plant technology: germination and initial growth. Thermometric Application Note 22017.
  • Nagel M, Vogel H, Landjeva S, Buck-Sorlin G, Lohwasser U, Scholz U, Böhner A. (2009) Seed conservation in ex situ genebanks—genetic studies on longevity in barley. Euphytica 170: 5–14.
  • Nagel M, Kranner I, Neumann K, Rolletschek H, Seal C, Colville L, Fernández-Marín B, Börner A. (2015) Genome-wide association mapping and biochemical markers reveal that seed ageing and longevity are intricately affected by genetic background, developmental and environmental conditions in barley. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1011–1022. [PubMed]
  • Nakabayashi K, Okamoto M, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Nambara E. (2005) Genome-wide profiling of stored mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana seed germination: epigenetic and genetic regulation of transcription in seed. Plant J 41: 697–709. [PubMed]
  • National Research Council (1972) Genetic Vulnerability of Crops. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
  • Nonogaki H, Bassel GW, Bewley JD. (2010) Germination—still a mystery. Plant Sci 179: 574–581.
  • Ogé L, Bourdais G, Bove J, Collet B, Godin B, Granier F, Boutin JP, Job D, Jullien M, Grappin P. (2008) Protein repair l-isoaspartyl methyltransferase1 is involved in both seed longevity and germination vigor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 3022–3037. [PubMed]
  • Osborne DJ. (2000) Hazards of a germinating seed: available water and the maintenance of genomic integrity. Isr J Plant Sci 48: 173–179.
  • Osborne DJ, Sharon R, Ben-Ishai R. (1981) Studies on DNA integrity and DNA repair in germinating embryos of rye (Secale cereale). Isr J Bot 29: 259–272.
  • Pastore D, Trono D, Laus MN, Di Fonzo N, Flagella Z. (2007) Possible plant mitochondria involvement in cell adaptation to drought stress: a case study: durum wheat mitochondria. J Exp Bot 58: 195–210. [PubMed]
  • Prat H. (1952) Microcalorimetric studies on germinations of cereals. Can J Bot 30: 379–394.
  • Priestley DA. (1986) Seed Aging: Implications of Seed Storage and Persistence in the Soil. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • Priestley DA, Werner BG, Leopold AC. (1985) The susceptibility of soybean seed lipids to artificially enhanced atmospheric oxidation. J Exp Bot 36: 1653–1659.
  • Prieto-Dapena P, Castano R, Almoguera C, Jordano J. (2006) Improved resistance to controlled deterioration in transgenic seeds. Plant Physiol 142: 1102–1112. [PubMed]
  • Pritchard HW, Dickie JB. (2003) Predicting seed longevity: the use and abuse of seed viability equations. In Smith RD, Dickie JB, Linington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ, editors. , eds, Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp 653–722.
  • Probert RJ, Daws MI, Hay FR. (2009) Ecological correlates of ex situ seed longevity: a comparative study on 195 species. Ann Bot 104: 57–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Puntarulo S, Galleano M, Sanchez RA, Boveris A. (1991) Superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide metabolism in soybean embryonic axes during germination. Biochim Biophys Acta 1074: 277–283. [PubMed]
  • Qiao YM, Wang RJ, Bai YG, Hansen LD. (2005) Characterizing critical phases of germination in winterfat and malting barley with isothermal calorimetry. Seed Sci Res 15: 229–238.
  • Rajjou L, Lovigny Y, Groot SPC, Belghazi M. (2008) Proteome-wide characterization of seed aging in Arabidopsis: a comparison between artificial and natural aging protocols. Plant Physiol 148: 620–641. [PubMed]
  • Rajjou L, Duval M, Gallardo K, Catusse J, Bally J. (2012) Seed germination and vigor. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 507–533. [PubMed]
  • Ravanel S, Gakiere G, Job D, Douce R. (2008) The specific features of methionine biosynthesis and metabolism in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7805–7812. [PubMed]
  • Reape TJ, McCabe PF. (2008) Apoptotic-like programmed cell death in plants. New Phytol 30: 175–180. [PubMed]
  • Revilla P, Butrón A, Rodríguez VM, Malvar RA, Ordás A. (2009) Identification of genes related to germination in aged maize seed by screening natural variability. J Exp Bot 60: 4151–4157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Reyes JL, Chua NH. (2007) ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J 49: 592–606. [PubMed]
  • Roberts BE, Osborne DJ. (1973) Protein synthesis and loss of viability in rye embryos. The liability of transferase enzymes during senescence. Biochem J 135: 405–410. [PubMed]
  • Roberts EH. (1973) Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Sci Technol 1: 449–514.
  • Rocha PSCF, Sheikh M, Melchiorre R, Fagard M, Boutet S, Loach R, Moffatt B, Wagner C, Vaucheret H, Furner I. (2005) The Arabidopsis HOMOLOGYDEPENDENT GENE SILENCING1 gene codes for an S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine hydrolase required for DNA methylation-dependent gene silencing. Plant Cell 17: 404–417. [PubMed]
  • Sattler SE, Gilliland LU, Magallanes-Lundback M, Pollard M, DellaPenna D. (2004) Vitamin E is essential for seed longevity and for preventing lipid peroxidation during germination. Plant Cell 16: 1419–1432. [PubMed]
  • Sawicki A, Willows RD. (2010) BchJ and BchM interact in a 1 : 1 ratio with the magnesium chelatase BchH subunit of Rhodobacter capsulatus. FEBS J 277: 4709–4721. [PubMed]
  • Schopfer P, Plachy C, Frahry G. (2001) Release of reactive oxygen intermediates (superoxide radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals) and peroxidase in germinating radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seeds controlled by light, gibberellin and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 125: 1591–1602. [PubMed]
  • Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. (2011) Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 426–437. [PubMed]
  • Shatters RG, Schweder ME, West SH, Abdelghany A, Smith RL. (1995) Environmentally-induced polymorphisms detected by RAPD analysis of soybean seed DNA. Seed Sci Res 5: 109–116.
  • Shin JH, Kim SR, An G. (2009) Rice aldehyde dehydrogenase7 is needed for seed maturation and viability. Plant Physiol 149: 905–915. [PubMed]
  • Sigstad EE, Prado FE. (1999) A microcalorimetric study of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. seed germination. Thermochim Acta 326: 159–164.
  • Slupphaug G, Kavli B, Krokan HE. (2003) The interacting pathways for prevention and repair of oxidative DNA damage. Mutat Res 531: 231–251. [PubMed]
  • Smith MT, Berjak P. (1995) Deteriorative changes associated with the loss of viability of stored desiccation-tolerant and desiccation-sensitive seeds. In Kigel J, Galili G, editors. eds, Seed Development and Germination. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 701–746.
  • Smith RD, Dickie JD, Linington SH, Pritchard HW, Probert RJ. (2003) Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.
  • Sreenivasulu N, Wobus U. (2013) Seed-development programs: a systems biology-based comparison between dicots and monocots. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 189–217. [PubMed]
  • Stein JC, Hansen G. (1999) Mannose induces an endonuclease responsible for DNA laddering in plant cells. Plant Physiol 121: 71–80. [PubMed]
  • Sung JM, Jeng TL. (1994) Lipid peroxidation and peroxide-scavenging enzymes associated with accelerated aging of peanut seed. Plant Physiol 91: 51–55.
  • Takahashi H, Kopriva S, Giordano M, Saito K, Hell R. (2011) Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62: 157–184. [PubMed]
  • Thomas CA. (1960) Permeability measurements of castor bean seed indicative of cold-test performance. Science 131: 1045–1046. [PubMed]
  • van Treuren R, de Groot EC, van Hintum JL. (2013) Preservation of seed viability during 25 years of storage under standard genebank conditions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60: 1407–1421.
  • Vazquez-Ramos JM, Lopez S, Vazquez E, Murillo E. (1988) DNA integrity and DNA polymerase activity in deteriorated maize embryo axes. J Plant Physiol 133: 600–604.
  • Ventura L, Donà M, Macovei A, Carbonera D, Buttafava A, Mondoni A, Rossi G, Balestrazzi A. (2012) Understanding the molecular pathways associated with seed vigor. Plant Physiol Biochem 60: 196–206. [PubMed]
  • Verma P, Kaur H, Petla BP, Rao V, Saxena SC, Majee M. (2013) PROTEIN l-ISOASPARTYL METHYLTRANSFERASE2 gene is differentially expressed in chickpea and enhances seed vigor and longevity by reducing abnormal isoaspartyl accumulation predominantly in seed nuclear proteins. Plant Physiol 16: 1141–1157. [PubMed]
  • Vijay D, Dadlani M, Kumar PA, Panguluri SK. (2009) Molecular marker analysis of differentially aged seeds of soybean and safflower. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27: 282–291.
  • Wadso I. (2000) Trends in isothermal microcalorimetry. Thermochim Acta 347: 73–86.
  • Walters C. (1998) Understanding the mechanisms and kinetics of seed ageing. Seed Sci Res 8: 223–244.
  • Walters C, Wheeler LM, Grotenhuis JM. (2005) Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: species characteristics. Seed Sci Res 15: 1–20.
  • Walters C, Ballesteros D, Vertucci VA. (2010) Structural mechanics of seed deterioration: standing the test of time. Plant Sci 6: 565–573.
  • Wang WQ, Cheng HY, Møller IM, Song SQ. (2012) The role of recovery of mitochondrial structure and function in desiccation tolerance of pea seeds. Plant Physiol 144: 20–34. [PubMed]
  • Waterworth WM, Masnavi G, Bhardwaj RM, Jiang Q, Bray CM, West CE. (2010) A plant DNA ligase is an important determinant of seed longevity. Plant J 63: 848–860. [PubMed]
  • Weber H, Borisjuk L, Wobus U. (2005) Molecular physiology of legume seed development. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 253–279. [PubMed]
  • Wettlaufer SH, Leopold AC. (1991) Relevance of Amadori and Maillard products to seed deterioration. Plant Physiol 97: 165–169. [PubMed]
  • Williams RJ, Leopold AC. (1989) The glassy state in corn embryos. Plant Physiol 89: 977–981. [PubMed]
  • Wu X, Liu H, Wang W, Chen S, Hu X, Li C. (2011) Proteomic analysis of seed viability in maize. Acta Physiol Plant 33: 181–191.
  • Xin X, Wan Y, Wang W, Yin G, McLamore ES, Lu X. (2013) A real-time, non-invasive, micro-optrode technique for detecting seed viability by using oxygen influx. Sci Rep 3: 3057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Xing S, Qin GJ, Shi Y, Ma Z, Chen Z, Gu HY, Qu LJ. (2007) GAMT2 encodes a methyltransferase of gibberellic acid that is involved in seed maturation and germination in Arabidopsis. J Integr Plant Biol 49: 368–381.
  • Yamaguchi S, Smith MW, Brown RGS, Kamiya Y, Sun TP. (1998) Phytochrome regulation and differential expression of gibberellin 3β-hydroxylase genes in germinating Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 10: 2115–2126. [PubMed]
  • Yao Z, Liu L, Gao F, Rampitsch C, Reinecke DM, Ozga JA, Ayele BT. (2012) Developmental and seed aging mediated regulation of antioxidative genes and differential expression of proteins during pre- and post-germinative phases in pea. J Plant Physiol 169: 1477–1488. [PubMed]
  • Zhou Q, Togun T, Li P, Liu Z. (2014) A pilot study of next-generation sequencing on cell-free DNA from blood plasma and bone marrow fluid for detecting Leukemic clonal abnormalities. North Am J Med Sci 7: 180–185.
  • Zhou Y, Chu P, Chen H, Li Y, Liu J, Ding Y, Tsang EWT, Jiang L, Wu K, Huang S. (2012) Overexpression of Nelumbo nucifera metallothioneins 2a and 3 enhances seed germination vigor in Arabidopsis. Planta 235: 523–537. [PubMed]

Articles from Conservation Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press