|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Eating disorders are complex and serious psychiatric illnesses whose etiology includes psychological, biological, and social factors. Treatment of eating disorders is challenging as there are few evidence-based treatments and limited understanding of the mechanisms that result in sustained recovery. In the last 20 years, we have begun to identify neural pathways that are altered in eating disorders. Consideration of how these pathways may contribute to an eating disorder can provide an understanding of expected responses to treatments. Eating disorder behaviors include restrictive eating, compulsive overeating, and purging behaviors after eating. Eating disorders are associated with changes in many neural systems. In this targeted review, we focus on three cognitive processes associated with neurocircuitry differences in subjects with eating disorders such as reward, decision-making, and social behavior. We briefly examine how each of these systems function in healthy people, using Neurosynth meta-analysis to identify key regions commonly implicated in these circuits. We review the evidence for disruptions of these regions and systems in eating disorders. Finally, we describe psychiatric and psychological treatments that are likely to function by impacting these regions.
Eating disorders are complex multifactorial diseases without a clear pathogenesis. Eating disorders are diagnosed based on specific constellations of disordered cognitions and behaviors. Those behaviors include restrictive eating patterns, compulsive overeating behaviors, and purging behaviors. Anorexia nervosa (AN) is defined as an illness with pronounced restrictive eating patterns that result in weight loss in concert with a distorted perception of one’s size and shape and self-worth. Binge-eating disorder (BED) is characterized by compulsive overeating behaviors. Bulimia nervosa (BN) is characterized by both compulsive overeating in concert with purging behaviors and a tight link between one’s self-worth and one’s appearance. Eating disorders have high levels of morbidity and mortality rates1–3 and evidence-based treatments for eating disorders are few.4–7
The objective of this targeted review is to consider eating disorder treatments in the context of the current understanding of healthy brain function based primarily on cognitive neuroscience studies. First, we briefly consider expected nutritional problems that may result from eating disorder behaviors and lead to alterations in brain function. Next, we evaluate the evidence for alterations in reward pathway function, decision-making abilities, and social behavior in eating disorders. Neurosynth meta-analyses are used to provide an overview of the neural regions that have been connected with each of these cognitive processes. Functional magnetic resonance imaging papers examining these three cognitive processes were identified using a systematic, targeted review of the literature. Finally, we interpret alterations in the function of these pathways in the context of both studies of healthy subjects and treatment interventions utilized in eating disorders. Overall, the objective of this review is to provide an understanding of the types of cognitive neuroscience evidences that support various eating disorder treatment methodologies as well as to suggest future directions in translating neuroimaging data toward treatment.
This targeted review focuses on considering the insights into translational treatments of people with eating disorders that can be gleaned from cognitive neuroimaging studies. First, an overview of the acute problems expected from nutritional factors related to eating disorders is provided. These are fundamental factors that impact the efficacy of all treatments. Next, a systematic review identifies evidence that the roles of three major neural systems in healthy people are disrupted in EDs: reward processes, decision-making processes, and social brain function. Each of the terms (“reward,” “decision,” and “social”) was selected because 1) the neural circuitry associated with these processes has been a focus of multiple imaging studies in healthy subjects, 2) the healthy studies include a wide range of specific task paradigms, and 3) considerable literature, both imaging and clinical work, has focused on these topics in eating disorder patients. Further restriction of these search terms, such as dividing social into self or theory-of-mind, both reduces the saliency of the network visualized in the meta-analyses, and greatly limits the number of relevant studies conducted in eating disorder populations.
Finally, a Neurosynth reverse-inference meta-analysis was conducted to provide a general reference that visualizes the neural networks commonly engaged by each of these processes using the terms “reward,” “decision,” and “social.”8 The location and voxel-extent engaged in each of these maps at a PFDR < 0.01 are provided. Neurosynth extracts 1) verbal descriptive terms from the abstracts of published neuroimaging studies in concert with 2) coordinates of the neural regions reported in the tables of the manuscripts. The reverse-interference meta-analysis provides an automated method to analyze these studies, providing an overview of neural systems relevant to the search terms. For the systematic and targeted review of these topics in eating disorders, PubMed (1809 to February 2015) was searched in the following manner: the patient descriptor “Eating Disorders,” “Anorexia Nervosa,” “Bulimia Nervosa,” or “Binge-Eating Disorder” was combined with the term “Neuroimaging.” Then, it was combined with one of the following terms “Reward,” “Social,” “Decision,” or “Decision-Making.” The resulting articles were screened to include only those studies comparing eating disorder subjects with healthy comparison human subjects (HC) and utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Papers that were review articles, case studies, involved multiple eating disorder populations without health controls, and healthy control only studies were outside the scope of the systematic review. Six additional articles referenced by the identified articles and relevant to the review topics were also included. The resulting searches identified a total of 32 papers, which are summarized in Tables 1–3.
This review article is focused on the identification of cognitive neuroimaging data with translational relevance for the treatment of eating disorders. Three themes were identified by the authors in the course of the review that were particularly important and appropriate for a systematic review utilizing cognitive neuroimaging studies such as reward, decision, and social processing. However, it would be inappropriate to ignore the potential role that nutritional factors have on both brain development and on function. As such, the results section begins with a review of nutritional factors that relate to eating disorder symptoms. Following that section, results are organized by each search term, with each major section beginning with a description of the Neurosynth meta-analysis results. This Neurosynth meta-analysis allows a quantitative view of neural regions typically engaged during reward, decision, and social function tasks in healthy people. Each of these is followed by a section examining the neuroimaging studies in eating disorders identified in the systematic review. Based on the search of the eating disorder literature, papers utilizing similar paradigms, examining the same eating disorder diagnoses, or activating similar regions were described together.
There are a number of challenges in studying brain function in patients with eating disorders. The first is obvious, and a healthy brain function depends on a steady source of nutrients from all food groups. All eating disorders can interfere with healthy brain function by disrupting nutrient supplies. This problem is most obvious in AN when nutrient intake is insufficient to maintain body weight, but it can also be a factor in BN and BED, due to the selective restriction of particular food groups and binge-eating behaviors. Neurons utilize glucose as their sole energy source. Glucose is most readily obtained from simple sugars and carbohydrates, foods commonly restricted during dieting behaviors.9 Additionally, the structure of the brain is entirely composed of myelin, a high-density fat that surrounds neurons throughout the brain. Fat is another substance that is commonly excluded from the diet during restricting behaviors.10 Both carbohydrate and fat consumption is reduced in patients with AN.11,12 Fat consumption is more consistently reduced in overall diet in BED and BN, although the most common foods consumed during binges are carbohydrates.12,13 Importantly, most substantial neurodevelopmental changes are related to myelination of neurons, permitting faster neurotransmission between specific regions of the brain.14,15 During adolescence and young adulthood, myelination includes connecting the anterior and posterior regions of the brain, a process associated with abstract thinking, executive function, and decision-making.16,17 These processes have been reported to be altered in adults with eating disorders.18–20
Mood and motivation may vary with protein availability, as neurotransmitters, and their receptors are built from amino acids. In particular, mood and motivation have been closely connected to neural signaling involving serotonin and dopamine.21 Both are synthesized from essential amino acids, such as tryptophan (serotonin) and phenylalanine (dopamine). Interestingly, in healthy people, acute tryptophan deficiency (ATD) can be induced using a high protein shake that contains all the other amino acids except tryptophan.22 The average healthy person shows reduced mood and increases in impulsive behaviors for several hours following the ATD protocol.23,24 These data, in concert with other work examining serotonin and dopamine levels in the brain,25–27 support the idea that variations in the availability of these neurotransmitters may acutely alter mood and motivation. Even relatively normal levels of dietary restraint in athletes, high school, and college students have been correlated with elevations in irritability, apprehension, moodiness, depression, self-esteem, social withdrawal, and apathy, akin to those reported in the Minnesota starvation study.28–30 One study reported that women with bulimia nervosa showed similar mood shifts in response to ATD as in healthy people, and further, that those women with BN on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors reported increased desires to binge following ATD.31 In both recovered and ill patients with AN compared to healthy women, ATD caused more substantial changes in serum tryptophan levels, but interestingly, the subjects with AN reported feeling less anxious during the ATD than the healthy women.32 In sum, mood changes should be anticipated in patients who regularly restrict and binge. Once nutritional deficiencies are corrected after refeeding, designing and monitoring a healthy meal plan, and preventing binges, differences in the availability and efficacy of neurotransmitters might still impact brain function for some subjects, as common genetic variants are known to alter the metabolism and function of neurotransmitters and their receptors.33
On the structural side, both the hippocampi and anterior cingulate show reduced thickness of gray matter in patients currently with AN, but these regions also appear to recover in size after weight restoration.34–36 Consistent with these data, neuropsychological processes associated with hippocampal function, including working memory, spatial reasoning, and set-shifting, are commonly impaired in patients currently with AN.37 Recently, cognitive remediation therapy has been developed to improve flexibility of thinking and reasoning, potentially providing stimulation to these regions in AN.38 Furthermore, the anterior cingulate appears to play an essential role in self-regulation and emotional self-appraisal, and dysfunction of the anterior cingulate has also been associated with alexithymia in AN patients.39 In conclusion, reductions in the size of neural regions that are involved in both memory and emotional regulation are observed in underweight subjects.
To provide neuroanatomical context to this review, we have included a Neurosynth meta-analysis that highlights the neural regions most commonly identified in studies of reward (Figure 1). Five hundred and sixty studies were included in construction of the reward map, with two clusters identified (PFDR < 0.01). The first cluster was quite large (8,953 vox) and included bilateral nucleus accumbens, putamen, caudate, anterior insula, as well as the midbrain, the anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). The second cluster was smaller (115 vox) and included the posterior cingulate. These are the areas that we will focus on as we consider neural differences occurring in eating disorder studies from the systematic review. Of note, the primary neural regions activated by reward studies are in subcortical (midbrain, thalamus, striatum) and limbic areas (cingulate). vmPFC is the neocortical region consistently engaged during reward studies.
Motivation is closely linked to dopamine release in nucleus accumbens, the ventral striatum, and the caudate nuclei.40,41 As nearly all behavior occurs because of motivation, disruptions related to motivation are nearly ubiquitous across mental illnesses, with both depression and addictions characterized by impairments in reward processing.42 Eating disorders commonly co-occur with both depression and substance abuse, leading to the possibility that both the hypoactivity for reward that is observed in depression and the hyperactivity for the addictive substances might occur in eating disorders.43–45
As eating itself is a primary reward process, alterations in the reward pathway function in response to food, both its taste and pictures of food, have been extensively studied in eating disorder patients. Many neuroimaging studies in eating disorders as well as obesity have focused on the brain responses to viewing and even tasting food, with additional comparisons assessing the brain responses to food when hungry and full (Table 1). The brain appears to process food differently in people with eating disorders. Most consistently, these studies have identified altered responses to food images in the ventral striatum for both AN and BN.46,47 Patients with histories of restrictive eating typically respond differently both when tasting food48–50 and when viewing pictures of food.49,51,52 In healthy people, being hungry generally increases neural responses to pictures of food, with elevated amygdala, parahippocampal, and fusiform activation during hunger.53 People with and recovered from AN (recAN), compared to HC, show less consistent relationships between their neural responses to food images and their hunger state.47
Similarly, people with BN have shown heightened activation in response to food images in reward regions54 as well as reduced activation in response to the taste of food in the insula and medial frontal gyrus.55 Frank et al56 conducted an elegant paradigm to examine differences in expected and unexpected food reward in BN. First, they engaged a conditioning procedure to train subjects to expect a specific association (a particular visual stimuli cued either administration of sucrose or artificial saliva), but on some trials the association was altered to create an unexpected event (no sucrose given for the sucrose stimulus or sucrose given for a saliva stimulus). They found that the BN subjects showed less activation in the insula, the ventral putamen, the amygdala and the lateral orbitofrontal cortex, when that association was disrupted. This supports the idea that actual reward may be less important than the expectation or idea of a reward in BN. Additionally, the responsivity of reward regions for people with BN appears to depend more strongly on emotional state with more ventral striatum responses when anticipating a positive food reward than observed in HC.57 In sum, all of these studies suggest that the anticipation and emotional values attached to the idea of food may be a stronger stimulus for the reward neurocircuitry than the administration of the actual food reward itself in BN.
Schienle et al58 compared neural activations in reward neurocircuits for food, disgust, and neutral object images in BN, BED, normal weight HC, and overweight HC. They found differences in the orbitofrontal cortex in BED, and differences in the anterior cingulate and insula in BN in response to food images. Weygandt et al59 then examined this dataset using machine-learning techniques to diagnostically differentiate the groups. They found that differences in the responses to food images in the right and left insula cortex and ventral striatum could be used to identify which patients had BN or BED, with accuracies around 84%. These differences related to food responses in the amygdala, the ventral striatum, and the anterior cingulate in both eating disorder groups, suggesting that eating disorder patients show greater engagement of cognitive control regions in response to food than healthy people.
Understanding whether differences in reward are solely related to eating and food or extend into the neural responses to other stimuli may help determine if biological differences related to experiencing reward may underlie or contribute to development or maintenance of disordered eating behaviors. To assess this, several studies have probed the neural responses to monetary rewards in subjects with eating disorders (Table 1). In AN, many of these comparisons focus on women in weight recovery from AN (recAN) and to mitigate the effects associated with acute starvation. First, Wagner et al60 found that recAN women did not show different neural responses in the ventral striatum for positive and negative feedback, unlike healthy women. Using the same paradigm, recBN women also failed to differentiate positive and negative feedback in both the ventral striatum and the dorsal caudate.61 Bischoff-Grethe et al62 then engaged this paradigm to examine adolescent subjects with AN, reporting that the recovered adolescents with AN showed more neural activation of executive and striatal regions in responses to losses. Balodis et al63 examined ventrostriatal activations in BED, HC of normal weight, and HC that were overweight using a monetary incentive task. There, overweight HC differed from both other two groups, with elevated ventrostriatal activity when anticipating a reward. Most recently, the neural responses to monetary reward were examined in hungry and satiated individuals in recovery from AN and compared to those in healthy women.64 In the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate, healthy women showed greater responses to monetary reward when hungry than satiated, but the recAN group showed the opposite pattern.
Structural studies have also identified differences in the size of brain regions in the reward pathway in eating disorders. Amianto et al65 found reduced caudate size in BN relative to AN and HC. Similarly, Mettler et al66 reported reduced fractional anisotropy in the corona radiata in BN, suggesting differences in the connectivity of regions related to taste and reward. Frank et al67 identified alterations in brain structure in both AN and BN, with increased gray matter (GM) in medial orbitofrontal cortex and insula and reduced dorsal striatal volumes. Importantly, dorsal striatum volumes were also positively related to sensitivity to reward in both illnesses, with greater volume of the dorsal striatum corresponding to greater sensitivity to reward. Finally, Titova et al68 recently completed a meta-analysis combining nine separate studies of brain volumes in AN, identifying specific deficits in GM in the hypothalamus, caudate, and right lentiform nucleus. Brooks et al69 connected the size of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with dietary restraint, a finding that suggests top-down cortical feedback may serve to suppress subcortical regions related to experiencing primary rewards. In total, all of these studies suggest that reward responses may be less salient in patients with eating disorders.
Problems in decision-making can amplify the symptoms of mental disease, particularly issues with high temporal discounting for rewards,70 a common problem in addictive disorders71 and borderline personality disorder.72 The choices that an individual makes should be expected to relate to engagement of their reward pathways. One important characteristic of the reward system is a close sensitivity of the timing of reward relative to decisions and choices.73 Expectations about reward change the actual experience of reward, such that it is often more pleasurable to receive a small reward when expecting nothing than to receive a small reward when expecting a large reward.74 These studies demonstrate that cognitive expectations can modify psychological experience. Using Neurosynth to conduct a meta-analysis examining “decision,” 569 studies were combined, resulting in an activation map with seven clusters at PFDR < 0.01 (Figure 1). Many of these clusters overlapped with areas previously identified using the reward meta-analysis: the left caudate (247 vox), the right caudate (232 vox), two clusters in the medial prefrontal cortex (63 and 85 vox), the right inferior frontal gyrus and insula (81 vox), and the left inferior frontal gyrus and insula (54 vox). Only one new region was engaged: the dorsal anterior cingulate (238 vox). In sum, activations of subcortical reward regions are closely related to decisions and decision-making, with the addition of a portion of frontal cortex.
Eating disorders are characterized by recurrent problems in decision-making, leading to poor behavioral choices about consuming food, both eating too little or too much, as well as overexercising and engaging in purging behaviors. The Iowa Gambling Test asks participants to select cards with different values of money on them. The objective is to choose cards with larger long-term monetary gain, and those who do are deemed to have better decision-making skills. Several researchers have examined decision-making using behavioral measures from this task in eating disorder patients. Cavedini et al75 reported that patients with AN have poor performance compared to HC but that there was no relationship between the severity of illness and the degree of poor performance. Tchanturia et al found that people with AN performed more poorly than both HC and recAN, and whereas recAN and HC did not significantly differ76 In a study comparing AN, BN, and HC, AN and BN were both determined to have worse performance than HC, but AN and BN did not differ significantly between one another.77–79 Importantly, all of this work suggests that deficits in decision making are present in ill subjects, but not in recovered subjects. Thus, poor decision-making may be a state-based phenomenon.
Only a few neuroimaging studies have directly accessed decision-making in eating disorders (Table 2). Decker et al80 examined decision-making in AN with fMRI at two time points, at treatment initiation and after weight-recovery, using a delayed-discounting task. Participants provided their preference about receiving some money now or a different amount of money at a future time point, allowing an individual discounting rate for each participant to be obtained, while examining neural activity during their decisions. Their data suggest that while underweight, patients with AN prefer future rewards to current rewards compared to healthy women, although the opposite phenomena occurred in the Iowa Gambling Task.75,76,81 The bias seen by Decker et al80 also normalized after weight recovery, consistent with the Iowa Gambling studies of recovered AN.76 Further, normalization of the delayed discounting behaviors corresponded to higher activity in the anterior cingulate, the ventral striatum, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and parietal cortex. These data suggest that starvation impacts not only subcortical reward regions but also higher cortical regions engaged to evaluate decisions.
Making decisions involves collecting and synthesizing information prior to acting on it. As such, impulsivity is a specific personality trait that sabotages decisions and frequently appears altered in psychopathology, particularly in addictions.82 Impulsivity has also been shown to be elevated in office assessments for both BN and AN, binge/purge (B/P) type,83,84 and in BED.85,86 Neuroimaging studies using the Simon spatial incompatibility task to assess cognitive control identified reduced activations in the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate during response inhibition tasks in adults and adolescents with BN and AN, B/P type.87–89 Marsh et al90 later identified a structural difference related to symptom severity, that is, reduced gray matter in patients with BN in the inferior frontal gyri and temporoparietal regions. Lock et al91 also found differences in neural activations during another response inhibition task when comparing restricting AN with a binge–purge AN/BN group. That study found increased frontal and anterior cingulate activations in the binge–purge group, which was interpreted as inefficient processing. Impulsivity may be related to altered engagement of frontal regions as well as the bingeing and purging behaviors in EDs. Similarly, Kullmann et al92 utilized a Go/No-Go paradigm, with both food and nonfood stimuli and images of active and resting people in AN, healthy comparison athletes, and typical healthy comparison subjects. They found that the AN group had increased prefrontal cortex responses to the active people, suggesting alterations in frontostriatal circuits for stimuli related to the illness.92 In sum, differences in several frontal regions of the brain commonly engaged in decision-making and impulsivity measures are altered in eating disorders, particularly in patients with binge and purge behaviors.
Using Neurosynth to conduct a meta-analysis examining “social,” 960 studies were combined, resulting in an activation map with 12 clusters at PFDR < 0.01 (Figure 1). There is considerably less overlap in the social map than the reward and decision maps showed, with social studies activating many more cortical clusters. The only overlapping regions were areas in the medial prefrontal cortex (2,177 vox) and bilateral clusters in the inferior frontal gyri and insula (R, 391 vox; L, 451 vox). These regions have frequently shown alterations in both BN and AN.46,47,93 Other social regions included the precuneus (583 vox), bilateral temporoparietal junctions (two clusters on R, 391 vox and 60 vox; L 556 vox), bilateral amygdala (R, 360 vox, L 257 vox), a cluster in the right temporal pole (572 vox), right fusiform (134 vox), and superior frontal gyrus (54 vox). Of note, these social regions include both regions engaged in reward processing (the ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex) and regions activated during decision-making (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyri, and dorsal anterior cingulate).
Activations of many regions included in this social network can be altered based on sociocultural factors. Preferences for appearance of others95,96 appear highly malleable and can be altered over the short course of a scan to conform to what one is told about other people’s preferences. Izuma and Adolphs97 showed that exposure to the preferences of peers and an anti-peer group (sex offenders) about T-shirts over the course of short, single scanner session, not only altered brain activity in the dmPFC that day, but that these changes in the dmPFC persisted for 4 months. Specific brain regions, including both the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex, appear to track and adjust the current value of potential items based on societal valuation, generally provided in the form of “this is how much your peers like this.” These results are not surprising, as humans are social creatures, and nearly all of our preferences for whom we socialize with, and what our beliefs and values are, emerge based on interactions with other people.
Eating disorder (ED) behaviors have been related to the adoption of Western values and the exposure to Western media, supporting an idea that brain differences related to social factors might be present in this illness. Anne Becker98 studied Fijian girls (mean age 17) in 1995 and 1998. The first wave was surveyed in 1995 when Western television had been accessible on the island for less than a month. The 1998 wave had been exposed to television for 3 years and had radically different attitudes regarding body image and eating. The percentage of girls purging to achieve weight goals was 0% in 1995 to 11.3% in 1998.98 In subsequent work, Becker et al found that even indirect exposure to television, through peers with access to television, impacted the adolescent’s beliefs related to the ideal female body image and social identity.99
Several imaging studies have examined neural responses to social stimuli in EDs (Table 3). During imaging tasks probing general social behaviors, subjects with AN and BN have shown reduced modulation of the inferior frontal gyri, the medial temporal gyrus, the temporoparietal junctions, and the medial prefrontal cortex.100–102 Modulation of the medial prefrontal cortex in currently ill adolescents with AN has even been associated with outcomes after treatment for the disorder,102 supporting the idea that social brain function may be an important consideration in predicting outcomes following treatment.
One basic social–emotional task involves intuiting other people’s emotional states by viewing faces. Cowdrey et al103 presented emotional faces to 16 weight-recovered AN subjects and 16 HC and found no neural differences. In contrast, using a similar task but with 31 underweight AN subjects and 31 HC, Fonville et al104 found elevated responses in the fusiform gyrus in the AN subjects while viewing neutral, happy, and very happy expressions relative to healthy women. Ashworth et al105 found reduced neural responses in the precuneus for angry and disgusting expression in subjects with BN compared to healthy women, as well as reduced amygdala activation to angry expressions. In concert, these data suggest that the patients currently meeting criteria for eating disorders are more likely to show altered neural responses to basic social and emotional stimuli than patients recovered from an eating disorder.
Considering social and body image descriptive adjectives related to oneself or others are a social cognitive task that can engage neural regions related to self-knowledge, typically the midline cortical structures.106 Pringle et al107 reported reduced activation in the precuneus, occipital area, putamen, and amygdala in response to rating the relevance of negative social adjectives in BN. Miyake et al108 found that AN subjects showed elevated frontal activations for negative social adjectives relative to the HC subjects. Further, the amount of alexithymia in the AN group correlated with the activation of both the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, suggesting that emotional processing of negative stimuli in these self-referential neural regions may be specifically impaired in AN. Suda et al109 also observed reduced activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and right fusiform gyrus in an AN group, in response to viewing individuals engaging in body checking, an ED behavior. All of these studies suggest that self-knowledge may be specifically altered in EDs, consistent with the recently proposed idea that our self may be largely defined by what is rewarding to us.110
We examined the neural differences in adults with AN and BN using a pair of self-appraisal tasks.101,111 Subjects were asked to consider the validity of statements about themselves, their friend or their friend’s opinion of themselves. Two versions of the task were presented; in the social version, the prompt was a social adjective such as “kind,” whereas in the physical version, the prompt was a physical descriptor such as “white teeth.” One interesting observation was that the patient groups showed more activity in the precuneus for physical descriptors related to their friend or friend’s opinion whereas the healthy subjects showed much stronger activity in the precuneus when considering the social characteristics of their friend. A recent meta-analysis has identified activations of the precuneus as primarily related to other processing.112 These data suggest that the patients with eating disorders show less neural responsivity for social descriptors than for physical descriptors. Interestingly, Cabanis et al113 recently examined positive and negative social attributions in healthy people and identified the posterior precuneus as a region specifically associated with positive self-attributions. In concert, these data suggest that there may be significant differences in neural function of the precuneus in relation to both self and other processing in patients with eating disorders.
Eating disorders are complex psychiatric illnesses that include alterations in the neural systems related to reward, decision-making, and social processing. At this point, we cannot determine if the neural differences identified in eating disorders cause or are caused by the eating disorder. This does not lessen the importance of understanding the effects of these differences in the patients. First, providers must continually reiterate the expected neurobiological changes in brain function that relate to impaired nutrition: fatigue, concentration, mood swings, insomnia, impulsivity, anhedonia and learning impairments are the expected sequelae of starvation.28,29 Furthermore, our ability to target treatments should consider identified neural differences. Ideally, research will be conducted examining the impact of treatments on neural function of these pathways and regions, to help identify the changes leading to recovery.
One major translational result emerging across these studies is that people with eating disorders show less of a connection between their physiological need for food and their reward pathway responses to food than healthy people. Eating disorders appear to disrupt both hunger and hedonic responses to food. This suggests that treatments that do not require patients to identify appropriate amounts of food based on internal cueing are more likely to be more effective, as the internal cueing related to hunger and satiety is disrupted. This is consistent with most inpatient and partial hospital programs for AN and BN in which a dietician generally creates a meal plan for the patients as well as outpatient family therapy in which the authority to select appropriate foods and their amounts is given to the parents or caregivers.114–116 For BN and BED, one common approach across most therapies and treatments involves development of strategies that limit access to foods that the patients associate with binge eating. Another important translational consideration are the findings that neural responses to food stimuli depend on the emotional state of eating disorder patients.57 Thompson-Brenner et al117 recently reported that the improvement of depressive symptoms 4 weeks after the start of treatment of BN was as robust a predictor of success in treatment as the improvement in purging symptoms at 4 weeks. This clinical study supports the importance of mood symptoms as a possible mediator of eating disorder behaviors, just as observed in neuroimaging activations described in Bohon and Stice.57
Excitingly, recent work examining food preferences in healthy subjects has shown that immediate feedback about peer preferences for specific foods alters both the subject’s reported preferences for specific foods and neural responses to images of that food in the nucleus accumbens (NA) and vmPFC. Nook and Zaki118 asked college students to rate how much they liked a variety of both healthy and hedonic foods. After each rating, they were told the “average college student” rating for that food. They then repeated the task without the immediate peer feedback. Subjects’ original ratings shifted toward that of the peers, with changes in neural activations in both the NA and vmPFC. These are regions that are both part of the “reward” pathways identified in the Neurosynth map (Figure 1). This study demonstrates that peer values related to food preference can significantly and immediately alter both subcortical (NA) and cortical (vmPFC) activations.
We would like to consider this study in the context of the development and treatment of eating disorders. In concert with the proliferation of eating disorder support, social media, and eating disorder promotion groups on the internet, people with eating disorders seek out information related to the valuation of both hedonic and healthy foods.119,120 These different experiences related to peer valuations for food in eating disorder subjects and healthy comparison subjects likely contribute to the different neural responses in valuation regions in eating disorders.47,121 Furthermore, the malleability of valuation of food observed in healthy people suggests one important process during eating disorder treatments may be assistance in helping patients formulate new values and expectations surrounding food. As a caution, these data also suggest that exposure to eating disorder beliefs about food from peers (eg, all fats are unhealthy) might intensify some symptoms of this disease.
The studies of reward (Table 1) also suggest that the subcortical levels of reward responses may be less salient in response to the direct food stimuli in patients who have had eating disorders. Unfortunately, reward defines much of people’s lives, and we choose to do things that are rewarding for us. For people with eating disorders, direction in life may be more challenging, given reduced saliency of signals from their reward pathways. From a translational perspective, treatments that improve reward signaling may lead to improved outcomes. These treatments might include psychotherapeutic treatments to identify and amplify reward signals, pharmaceutical strategies to enhance neurotransmitters involved in reward, or targeted regional brain stimulation. For example, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex appears most effective for the subset of depressed patients who also show high levels of anhedonia, a construct specifically related to the experience of reward.122 A recent case report describes a patient with both BN and depression who underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression but had rapid remission of bulimia symptoms following that procedure.123 Assessment of anhedonia may provide a useful clinical method to assess reward pathway function in eating disorders. However, more research is needed to relate psychological measures, such as anhedonia, with both eating disorder behaviors, such as purging, and the dysfunction of specific neurocircuitry.
Psychosocial factors may contribute substantially to the alterations in decision-making and social brain differences demonstrated in eating disorders. The largest differences we observed in both AN and BN subjects in comparison to HC subjects, during a social identity task were in the dorsal anterior cingulate, and corresponded to the difference between subjects thinking about themselves from another person’s perspective compared to thinking about themselves from their own perspective.101,111 Recently, activations of that region, the dorsal anterior cingulate, were specifically related to the difficulty of performing a task in healthy people.124 In considering the relationship between this part of the brain and its role in decision-making and choice difficulty, these data suggest that the patients with eating disorders may find the process of evaluating themselves to be a more challenging task than considering other people’s views. From a translational treatment perspective, these data suggest that helping eating disorder patients with sociocultural evaluations related to human social behaviors rather than physical appearance may facilitate recovery. Similarly, imaging studies that showing deficits in social perception in patients currently with eating disorders support a role for therapies with some focus on social relationships in eating disorders, such as family therapy, couples, and mentalization-based therapy.125–127
In conclusion, eating disorders appear to include changes in the neural systems that mediate reward responses, decision-making, and social behaviors. As such, treatments are likely to require individualization based on the specific constellation of symptoms that each patient expresses. Different reward values for different experiences likely lead to different choices. Consider people who choose to stay home, investing in amenities for their home, in contrast to people who love to travel, investing in the expense of airfare and hotels. In eating disorders, decision-making and social behaviors may reinforce eating disordered behaviors due to alterations in the reward values that have become associated with food and appearance. Cognitive treatments of EDs likely function at least in part by facilitating the normalization and acceptance of consistent healthy eating patterns while simultaneously working to devalue judgments that one’s worth is based on appearance.
One cognitive measure that may be worth further investigation is self-esteem. Low self-esteem has been proposed as a prerequisite for the development of an ED,128 appears to serve as a prognostic factor for the development of EDs,129 can persist even following recovery from BN,130 and improvements in self-esteem are associated with recovery and completion of treatment.131,132 Evidence from healthy women is accumulating that self-esteem may relate to the engagement of frontal brain regions during social tasks. In healthy women, Mischner et al have found that women with low self-esteem are both more attentive to and alter their beliefs more after exposure to sexually objectifying material133 and react less if given norm-challenging education prior to the exposure.134 Somerville et al135 have also demonstrated, in healthy participants, that activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and vmPFC are linearly responsive to positive feedback, but only for subjects with low self-esteem, suggesting that these regions are particularly important for identifying and evaluating societal expectations. Fascinatingly, these regions were engaged by all three of the neural systems examined here: reward, decision, and social processing (Figure 1), and differences in these regions are observed in many studies of both AN and BN.80,87,92,101,111,136–141 Researchers examining brain function in concert with recovery from eating disorders should include measures of self-esteem in concert with clinical symptoms to clarify how neural differences may be related to self-esteem.
Understanding the role of neurobiological processes in mediating psychosocial responsivity may also help in designing and executing more efficient treatments for EDs. Recently, real-time neurofeedback techniques have trained subjects with depression to modulate the amygdala, improving depressive symptoms,142 and healthy subjects have been able to enhance neural activity in the hypothalamus and frontopolar cortex associated with affliative emotions.143 In the future, real-time neurofeedback may enable targeted treatments for specific symptoms of eating disorders. For example, real-time modulation of the vmPFC during self-evaluation might be assessed as an adjuctive treatment for eating disorder patients with low self-esteem. Subjects with difficulties in reacting to food stimuli might benefit from real-time modulation of the ventral striatum in response to food stimuli. However, more research is needed to better characterize how psychological and cognitive measures are associated with neural pathway dysfunctions, and also to relate these measures and neural dysfunctions to treatment and recovery. These types of studies may lead to improvements in the ability to identify, characterize, and treat eating disorders.
CJM has support from an NIMH K23 MH093684, a 2012 NARSAD Young Investigator Award from the Brain and Behavior Foundation, and a Junior Investigator Award from the Children’s Clinical Research Advisory Board at Children’s Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.