PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2016 January 1; 291(1): 149–159.
Published online 2015 November 2. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M115.694133
PMCID: PMC4697152

MicroRNA Cargo of Extracellular Vesicles from Alcohol-exposed Monocytes Signals Naive Monocytes to Differentiate into M2 Macrophages*

Abstract

Membrane-coated extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by cells can serve as vehicles for delivery of biological materials and signals. Recently, we demonstrated that alcohol-treated hepatocytes cross-talk with immune cells via exosomes containing microRNA (miRNAs). Here, we hypothesized that alcohol-exposed monocytes can communicate with naive monocytes via EVs. We observed increased numbers of EVs, mostly exosomes, secreted by primary human monocytes and THP-1 monocytic cells in the presence of alcohol in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. EVs derived from alcohol-treated monocytes stimulated naive monocytes to polarize into M2 macrophages as indicated by increased surface expression of CD68 (macrophage marker), M2 markers (CD206 (mannose receptor) and CD163 (scavenger receptor)), secretion of IL-10, and TGFβ and increased phagocytic activity. miRNA profiling of the EVs derived from alcohol-treated THP-1 monocytes revealed high expression of the M2-polarizing miRNA, miR-27a. Treatment of naive monocytes with control EVs overexpressing miR-27a reproduced the effect of EVs from alcohol-treated monocytes on naive monocytes and induced M2 polarization, suggesting that the effect of alcohol EVs was mediated by miR-27a. We found that miR-27a modulated the process of phagocytosis by targeting CD206 expression on monocytes. Importantly, analysis of circulating EVs from plasma of alcoholic hepatitis patients revealed increased numbers of EVs that contained high levels of miR-27a as compared with healthy controls. Our results demonstrate the following: first, alcohol increases EV production in monocytes; second, alcohol-exposed monocytes communicate with naive monocytes via EVs; and third, miR-27a cargo in monocyte-derived EVs can program naive monocytes to polarize into M2 macrophages.

Keywords: cell signaling, exosome (vesicle), extracellular vesicles, liver injury, phagocytosis, alcoholic hepatitis

Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs),3 including exosomes and microvesicles (MVs), are heterogeneous, membranous, and cell-derived vesicles that are released by almost every cell type into their microenvironment. EVs have a lipid composition similar to those present on the plasma membranes of the parent cells (1,3). EVs act as signaling conveyors in cell-to-cell communication and contain bioactive molecules, including proteins, microRNAs (miRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Based on the mode of biogenesis, EVs can be categorized into two main classes as follows: shedding MVs (originating from plasma membrane) and exosomes (derived from multivesicular bodies) (2). Exosomal markers are CD63, CD81, and CD9, whereas microvesicles are annexin V-positive (3). Based on size distribution and CD63 expression, exosomes are defined as 40–150 nm and MVs as 150–1000 nm (4, 5). Recently, EVs, including exosomes, have emerged as important signaling organelles in mediating local and systemic communication between cells and in the pathogenesis of different diseases (6,9).

The pathogenesis of alcohol-induced liver disease is complex and is associated with liver abnormalities ranging from steatosis and inflammation to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (10,12). The intercellular signaling during alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is key to its progression and pathogenesis (13, 14). Our previous studies explored the role of exosomes in various liver diseases and showed that circulating miRNAs in exosomes may serve as biomarkers to differentiate between different types of hepatocyte injury and inflammation (15). Recent data showed a role for exosomes in communication between hepatocytes and monocytes/macrophages via horizontal transfer of hepatocyte-derived miR-122 to monocytes in the presence of alcohol (16). Innate immune cells, including monocytes and macrophages, play an important role in the pathogenesis of ALD. However, the role of immune cell-derived EVs in intercellular signaling and communication has yet to be explored in alcohol-induced immunoregulation.

Monocytes are the precursors of macrophages. In response to various signals, monocytes differentiate into macrophages with a polarized phenotype in the spectrum of M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes (17,19). Increasing evidence suggests that miRNAs, a class of non-coding RNAs, play an important role in macrophage polarization (7, 20,22). We and others have shown that miRNAs can regulate cellular differentiation and functions in immune cells (21, 23, 24). miRNAs not only function within the cells of origin but can also be packaged into EVs and released into the extracellular environment, where they are transferred in an active form to other cells and exert functional effects (16, 25,28). The possible contribution of circulating miRNAs transported via EVs to signal between monocytes and activate the process of monocyte differentiation and/or polarization has yet to be explored.

In this study, we investigated the effect of alcohol on EV secretion by human monocytes and studied the role of alcohol-induced EVs as an alternative mode of cell-to-cell communication between monocytes. Our data demonstrate that the total number of EVs secreted from alcohol-treated monocytes is significantly increased as compared with untreated monocytes. EVs originating from alcohol-exposed monocytes induced differentiation and polarization of naive monocytes into M2 macrophages. We demonstrated the role for miR-27a in EVs from alcohol-treated monocytes in inducing activation, polarization, and increased phagocytic activity of naive monocytes. These in vitro observations were validated in vivo where we found an increased number of EVs in the circulation of patients with alcoholic hepatitis, which had increased levels of miR-27a in the EV cargo. Our results suggest that in the pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis, EVs play an important role in cell-cell communication between monocytes/macrophages.

Experimental Procedures

Human Studies

Confirmed cases of alcoholic hepatitis (n = 8) and healthy individuals (n = 8) were enrolled. The diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis was performed by expert clinicians based on the patients' medical history, physical examination, and laboratory data and according to the guidelines of the American College of Gastroenterology (29). Healthy controls were defined as being free of any systemic and non-systemic diseases based on patients' history and routine laboratory findings performed by primary care physicians and a history of “only social” alcohol consumption. To avoid selection bias, healthy controls and patients were enrolled consecutively. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research at the University of Massachusetts Medical School (Worcester, MA), and written informed consents were obtained from all subjects. We obtained plasma samples from controls and patients for the study.

Reagents

RPMI 1640 cell culture media, antibiotics, and nonessential amino acids were purchased from Gibco. Exosome-depleted FBS (Exo-FBSTM) was purchased from System Biosciences (Mountain View, CA). CD14+ monocytes were isolated by MACS CD14 microbeads from Miltenyi Biotec (Auburn, CA). Human antibodies CD16 APC, CD14 FITC, and CD86 FITC were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego). Antibodies CD163 PE, CD68 PE, CD206 APC, and isotype control antibodies were purchased from Pharmingen. CD63 antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). miR-27a mimic and scrambled control were purchased from Ambion Life Technologies, Inc. Dextran-FITC beads were purchased from Sigma.

Cell Culture and EV Isolation

Primary human monocytes and THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 cell culture media containing antibiotics, nonessential amino acids, and FBS. For EV isolation and quantification experiments, the cells were cultured in the presence of RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% exosome-depleted FBS (Exo-FBSTM) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. For ethanol treatments, 25, 50, and 100 mm ethanol were added to the cells for various time points (24 and 48 h). At desired time points, culture media were harvested, and EVs were isolated or quantified using a NanoSight NS300 system (NanoSight, Amesbury, UK). For EV isolation from ethanol-treated and normal THP-1 cells, supernatants were centrifuged at 1500 × g for 10 min to remove cells followed by 10,000 × g for 20 min to deplete residual cellular debris, and then the supernatant was filtered through a 0.8-μm filter. The filtered supernatant was used to precipitate EVs with ExoQuick-TCTM, according to the manufacturer's guidelines (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). After isolation, EVs were resuspended in PBS. The concentration of EVs was determined by Bradford assay (30).

Co-culture Experiments

For co-culture experiments, EVs isolated from THP-1 cells or primary monocytes (ethanol-treated or non-treated) or from plasma of patients with alcoholic hepatitis or from healthy controls were added to normal primary human monocytes in the concentration of 25–50 μg/ml (50 μl). This concentration was comparable with EVs secreted by primary monocytes in the presence of ethanol. The monocytes were stimulated with EVs (25 μl) on day 1 and day 3 and cultured for 5 days.

EV Measurement Using Nanosight System and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

The concentration and diameter of EVs derived from culture supernatant from primary monocytes, THP-1 cells, and patient plasma samples were identified by a NanoSight equipped with a fast video capture and NTA software. Before using the samples, the instrument was calibrated with 100 nm polystyrene beads (Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA). The samples were captured for 90 s at room temperature. NTA software was used to measure particle concentration (particles/ml) and size distribution (in nanometers). For each sample, three measurements were taken, and the average value was determined.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SE)

THP-1 human monocytes were plated into 12-well plates and were left untreated or treated with 50 mm ethanol for 24 h. After 24 h, ethanol-treated THP-1 cells and untreated cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in Sorenson Phosphate buffer (0.1 m, pH 7.4) for 2 h. The cells were then given three 5-min washes with PBS and fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in 0.1 m PBS for 1 h. Next, the samples were rinsed and put through an alcohol dehydration series. The samples were mounted on aluminum, and the mounted specimens were coated with gold/palladium using a gold sputter coater. Then the samples were analyzed and examined with a MKII FEI Quanta 200 FEG MKII scanning electron microscope (FEI, Netherlands).

Western Blotting

EVs were isolated from THP-1 cells, and Western blot analysis for the exosomal marker CD63 was performed. EVs were resuspended in RIPA buffer, and the proteins were extracted. The proteins were run on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and blocked for 1 h in TBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20 at room temperature (TBST). The blot was then incubated overnight with primary CD63 antibody at 4 °C on a rocker. The following day, the blot was washed three times with TBST and then incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) for 1 h at a dilution of 1:10,000. ClarityTM Western ECL substrate kit (Bio-Rad) was used to develop the blot, and the CD63 protein band was visualized with a Fujifilm LAS-4000 luminescent image analyzer.

Flow Cytometry

Cell surface marker analysis on monocytes/macrophages was performed by flow cytometry as described previously (31). FcR blocking reagent (BD Biosciences) was used to inhibit nonspecific binding of antibodies. The cells were incubated with appropriate antibody or isotype control for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed with FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FBS) and acquired on a BD-LSR II (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed on FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). For CD14+ monocytes, we gated on the various markers and plotted the percentage of positive cells. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown by histogram plots.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Protein levels of TNFα, IL-10, IL-12, and TGFβ were measured in cell-free culture supernatant by ELISA. Whole blood cells isolated from human subjects were incubated overnight at 37 °C, and the levels of IL-10 and TGF-β secretion were determined by ELISA. Levels of TNFα, IL-12 (BD Biosciences), IL-10, and TGFβ (eBioscience, San Diego) were measured based on the manufacturers' recommendations and quantified using an ELISA reader.

Phagocytosis Assay

Mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis was measured as the cellular uptake of FITC-dextran and quantified by flow cytometry (32,35). For the phagocytosis assay, ~2 × 105 cells per sample were incubated in medium containing 1 mg/ml FITC-dextran beads for 120 min at 4 or 37 °C. After incubation, cells were washed with PBS containing 2% FBS. Phagocytic assays performed at 4 °C were used as negative controls (i.e. a reduced phagocytosis condition) and accounted for the particles bound to the cells' extracellular surface. The cells were acquired in the LSR II (BD Biosciences) instrument to analyze the uptake of FITC-dextran beads by the cells. The phagocytosis was calculated by normalizing with the phagocytosis at 4 °C. The phagocytosis index was calculated as described previously (36).

Loading miR-27a Mimic into the EVs and Monocyte Treatment

We loaded THP-1-derived EVs with miR-27a mimic and scrambled mimic according to our previously optimized protocol (4). Briefly, EVs were diluted in Gene Pulser® electroporation buffer (Bio-Rad) at a ratio of 1:1. miR-27a mimic or scrambled mimic at a final amount of 400 pmol was added to EV samples containing 1 μg/μl EV protein. For the dose-dependent experiments, 300, 100, and 40 pmol were loaded into the EVs. The mixtures (200 μl) were transferred into cold 0.2-cm electroporation cuvettes and electroporated at 150 kV and 100 microfarads with a Gene Pulser II System (Bio-Rad). The EVs were treated with 1 unit of RNase H to eliminate free-floating miR-27a mimic or scrambled mimic outside the EVs and were re-isolated using ExoQuick-TCTM. Based on the loading efficiency that we established earlier (4) and dilution of EVs, a final concentration of 10, 25, and 75 pmol of miR-27a mimic was used in the co-culture experiments with primary human monocytes.

RNA Isolation and miRNA Analysis (Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR))

EVs were lysed in QIAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen), and total RNA was isolated using Direct-zolTM RNA MiniPrep isolation kit (Zymo Research Corp, Irvine, CA). Optical density (260/280 and 260/230 ratios) was measured to check RNA quality and quantity. 50 μl of EV suspension from the supernatant of ethanol-treated cells or normal cells was mixed with 500 μl of QIAzol lysis buffer, and the mixture was processed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The extracted RNA was eluted with 25 μl of RNase-free water.

For miRNA analysis of exosomes, synthetic Caenorhabditis elegans (cel)-miR-39 was added during the total RNA isolation process and was used to normalize the qPCR data. TaqMan® miRNA assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were used for detection of miR-27a, miR-146a, and miR-9 expression according to the manufacturer's protocol, as described previously (4). The miRNA levels were normalized, and the relative expression of the specific miRNAs was presented by 2−ΔΔCt.

Statistical Analysis

All the data are expressed as mean ± S.E. of the mean (S.E.), which was obtained from three or more independent experiments. For pairwise comparisons, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test or parametric Student's t test was used based on underlying distribution. Comparison between groups was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test or the analysis of variance parametric test. p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism version 6.05 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Dose- and Time-dependent Induction of EV Secretion in Primary Human Monocytes and THP-1 Monocytic Cells Is Induced by Alcohol Treatment

Monocytes become activated in the presence of alcohol and are characterized by changes in the expression of cell surface molecules and the secretion of cytokines and chemokines (24, 37, 38). Recently, we have reported that alcohol-treated hepatocytes secrete increased numbers of exosomes (16). Thus, we hypothesized that ethanol treatment can induce EV secretion by monocytes. To evaluate the EV secretion pattern of monocytes, we treated human blood monocytes with different concentrations of ethanol and measured the EVs using a Nanosight instrument coupled with NTA software. We observed that ethanol treatment (25–100 mm) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the total number of EVs produced by monocytes (Fig. 1A). We found a significant increase in the number of secreted exosomes with the increasing concentrations of ethanol from 25 to 100 mm (Fig. 1A). These ethanol concentrations are relevant to human alcoholics because the 25 mm in vitro dose mimics binge drinking (~0.1 g/dl) blood alcohol content and 100 mm approximates 0.4 g/dl blood alcohol content seen in chronic alcoholics (39, 40). MV numbers did not change between 25 and 50 mm ethanol treatment, but it was significantly higher in the presence of 100 mm ethanol (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, we studied the kinetics of the vesicle secretion from 50 mm ethanol-exposed monocytes and observed significantly increased levels of total EVs and exosomes but not of the MVs at 24 and 48 h (Fig. 1B). These data suggest that there is a dose- and time-dependent increase in the secretion of EVs and exosomes with ethanol treatment in primary human monocytes.

FIGURE 1.
Ethanol treatment increases total number of EVs in a dose- and time-dependent manner in primary human monocytes and THP-1 cells. Primary human monocytes were isolated from healthy individuals and treated with different doses of ethanol (0–100 ...

Human Monocyte Cell Line, THP-1, Secretes EVs in the Presence of Ethanol Similar to Primary Monocytes

THP-1 is a widely used monocytic cell line that resembles primary monocytes in its phenotype and function (41, 42). Thus, we utilized THP-1 cells to further evaluate the EV secretion pattern of THP-1 cells in the presence of ethanol. We found that there was a dose- and time-dependent increase in the levels of EV secretion by the THP-1 cells treated with different doses of ethanol (25–50 mm) at 24 and 48 h after ethanol treatment (Fig. 1, C and D). Similar to the findings in the primary monocytes, the numbers of exosomes (~1.96 × 1010 particles/ml) was a magnitude higher as compared with MV numbers (~4.05 × 109 particles/ml), demonstrating that the majority of EVs from ethanol-treated THP-1 monocytes are exosomes.

Characterization of Monocyte-derived EVs

To visualize the EVs secreted from monocytes, the THP-1 cells were either left untreated or treated with ethanol for 48 h, and images were taken by an electron microscope. THP-1 cells treated with ethanol showed an increased number of shedding EVs (exosomes/MVs) compared with untreated control monocytes based on the electron micrograph (EM) (Fig. 2, A and B). EVs derived from monocytes expressed the exosomal marker CD63 as shown by the Western blot analysis (Fig. 2C). Using NTA software, analysis of the EVs secreted from monocytes revealed that the average size of the EVs derived from THP-1 cells was 131 nm (Fig. 2D).

FIGURE 2.
Characterization of EVs from THP-1 human monocytes. In human monocytic cells, THP-1 cells were treated with ethanol for 48 h or left untreated. A, EM image of untreated THP-1 cells (control); B, ethanol-treated THP-1 cells are shown (×3000 magnification). ...

EVs Derived from Ethanol-treated THP-1 Cells Stimulate Naive Cells to Differentiate into M2 Macrophages

EVs play a role in cellular communication and cell-to-cell signaling (1, 6, 43, 44). Therefore, we explored the effect of EVs derived from ethanol-exposed monocytes on naive monocytes. Although alcohol increased EV release in both the primary human monocytes and THP-1 monocytic cells, the number of EVs secreted by THP-1 monocytes was 10 times greater as compared with the primary monocytes (Fig. 1). Thus, to investigate the functional effect of EVs, we incubated naive primary human monocytes with ethanol-exposed THP-1-derived EVs and studied the expression of CD14 (a monocyte marker which is highly up-regulated in macrophages) and CD68 (macrophage marker) (27). We found that naive monocytes treated with EVs derived from ethanol-exposed THP-1 cells gained high CD14 expression as compared with control EV-exposed monocytes (Fig. 3A). The expression of the macrophage marker, CD68, was also increased in the CD14+ cells incubated with EVs from ethanol-treated monocytes (Fig. 3B). As shown in Fig. 3, A and B, EVs derived from control THP-1 cells did not change expression levels of CD14 and CD68 on naive monocytes, suggesting control EVs do not activate monocytes. Next we studied the expression of M1 and M2 macrophage markers on EV-treated monocytes. There was a significant increase in the frequency of CD206- and CD163-expressing cells in the presence of ethanol EVs as compared with control EVs (Fig. 3, E and F). In contrast, the frequency of M1 marker-expressing macrophages (CD16 and CD86) did not change (Fig. 3, C and D).

FIGURE 3.
Alcohol-induced THP-1 or primary monocyte-derived EVs promote naive monocytes to differentiate into macrophages with M2 phenotype. EVs were derived from alcohol-treated (EtOH EVs) and untreated THP-1 cells or primary monocytes after 48 h of alcohol/no ...

A recent study reported that glioblastoma-derived EV can transform the phenotype of monocytic cells to M2-type macrophages (9). To ascertain that the effects of alcohol-treated THP-1 cell-derived EVs on naive monocytes were not cell line-specific, we isolated EVs from primary monocytes treated or untreated with ethanol and then exposed these EVs to naive monocytes. As shown in Fig. 3G, the ethanol EVs from primary monocytes also promoted CD206 and CD163 expression similar to alcohol-treated THP-1 cell-derived EVs. These results suggest that the EVs from ethanol-treated primary monocytes or THP-1 cells could induce monocyte activation, differentiation, and macrophage polarization, thus demonstrating the role of alcohol in influencing the characteristics of monocyte-derived EVs.

Alcohol EVs Stimulate Naive Monocytes to Secrete Increased Levels of IL-10 and TGFβ

Next, we studied the effect of EVs derived from ethanol-exposed monocytes on the cytokine secretion pattern of naive monocytes. We observed that naive monocytes treated with EVs from ethanol-exposed THP-1 cells had no significant effect on IL-12 secretion but increased TNFα secretion, although the TNFα levels were in the very low range (1–3 pg/ml) (Fig. 4, A and B). We also evaluated the secretion pattern of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1, and found no significant differences between monocytes treated with alcohol EVs and control EVs (data not shown). In contrast to no change in most of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-10, and TGF-β were significantly increased from monocytes treated with alcohol EVs as compared with control EVs (Fig. 4, C and D). Furthermore, we evaluated the secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by naive monocytes that were incubated with EVs from ethanol-treated or untreated primary monocytes. We observed increased IL-10 and TGFβ and decreased levels of TNFα and IL-12 secretion in alcohol EV-treated cells as compared with control EVs (Fig. 4E). Thus, these results suggested that alcohol EVs modulate naive monocytes to secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines.

FIGURE 4.
Functional effect of alcohol-induced THP-1 and primary monocyte-derived EVs on naive monocytes. Primary monocytes were incubated with control and ethanol EVs derived from THP-1 cells for 5 days. Cell culture supernatants were collected, and cytokine levels ...

One of the characteristics of monocytes and macrophages is their property of phagocytosis (45). Because we found an increased expression of the mannose receptor, CD206, a C-type lectin, we studied the uptake of dextran-FITC beads that are mainly taken up through this receptor into macrophages (34, 35). We observed that there was a significant increase in the percentage of phagocytic cells in monocytes after alcohol EV treatment as compared with control EVs (Fig. 4F). The phagocytic index was also increased in the alcohol EV-treated monocytes as compared with control EV-treated cells (Fig. 4G). These results demonstrate that EVs derived from ethanol-treated monocytes signal to naive monocytes and modulate both their cytokine secretion as well as phagocytic capacity.

Analysis of the Cargo of Alcohol EVs Revealed Increased Presence of the M2-polarizing miRNA, miR-27a

EVs have been shown to contain miRNAs as their cargo (43). Because we demonstrated a significant effect of monocyte-derived alcohol EVs on the phenotype and function of naive monocytes, we next studied the profile of miRNA cargo in the EVs derived from ethanol (50 mm)-treated monocytes. Based on their functional role in monocyte activation, we first determined the miRNA expression of miRNAs miR-27a, miR-146a, and miR-9 (20, 46, 47). We found increased expression of miR-27a and miR-146a but not miR-9 in the THP-1 cells exposed to ethanol (Fig. 5A). Next, we studied the expression of these miRNAs in the EVs derived from THP-1 cells and observed a significant increase in the expression levels of miR-27a in EVs derived from ethanol-treated monocytes as compared with control EVs (Fig. 5B). The levels of miR-146a and miR-9 were not significantly changed in the control EVs versus alcohol EVs (Fig. 5B). These data suggested that miR-27a was selectively sorted into the EVs released by the ethanol-treated monocytes.

FIGURE 5.
miR-27a-enriched EVs promote naive monocytes to differentiate into macrophages. A, total RNA was isolated from THP-1 cells treated with 50 mm ethanol for 48 h, and RT-PCR was performed to study the levels of miR-27a, miR-146a, and miR-9 using TaqMan® ...

miR-27a-loaded EVs Have Functional Effects on Naive Monocytes Similar to Alcohol EVs

Given the selective increase in the levels of miR-27a in ethanol-induced exosomes, we aimed to investigate the functional role of EV-associated miR-27a in monocyte polarization. To achieve this, control EVs were loaded with miR-27a and incubated with naive monocytes. We were successful in loading EVs from untreated THP-1 monocytes with scrambled and various concentrations of miR-27a mimic as shown by the increased levels of miR-27a (Fig. 5C). Next, we incubated naive monocytes with EVs loaded with either miR-27a mimic or scrambled miRNA mimic. We observed a dose-dependent increase in CD68-positive cells in the presence of EVs loaded with miR-27a as compared with scrambled mimic-loaded EVs (Fig. 5D). There was no change in the levels of CD11c expression on the naive monocytes. M1 markers, CD86 and CD16, were differentially regulated as indicated by a decreased expression of CD86 and increased expression of CD16 in the presence of EVs containing the higher doses of miR-27a mimic (Fig. 5D). The expression of M2 macrophage markers, CD206 and CD163, was induced with the miR-27a mimic EVs as compared with scrambled mimic EVs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5D). These results demonstrated that miR-27a is present in the EVs, is functional, and effects naive monocytes in a dose-dependent manner that leads to robust M2 macrophage marker expression.

Next, we studied the effect of miR-27a overexpressing EVs on the cytokine secretion capacity of naive monocytes. We noted that there was an increased level of TNFα with increased expression of miR-27a in the EVs (Fig. 6A). However, there was no change in the expression level of other pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-12 (Fig. 6A) and IL-1β, IL-6, or MCP-1 (data not shown). There was a dose-dependent increase in the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β with miR-27a-overexpressed EVs as compared with control EVs (Fig. 6B).

FIGURE 6.
Functional effect of miR-27a-containing EVs on the cytokine secretion and phagocytosis of macrophages derived from naive monocytes. Primary human monocytes were incubated with miR-27a mimic (10–75 pmol) or scrambled mimic (75 pmol) loaded into ...

miR-27a Mediates the Process of Phagocytosis by Regulating CD206 Expression

miRNAs have emerged as regulators of phagocytosis in myeloid cells (48, 49). Thus, we wanted to evaluate the role of miR-27a in increased phagocytosis induced by alcohol EVs. The addition of various doses of miR-27a-overexpressing EVs to naive monocytes resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of phagocytosis and phagocytic index compared with scrambled mimic-loaded EVs (Fig. 6, C and D). These results suggested that miR-27a present in EVs can regulate monocyte phagocytosis. Because we observed a high expression of CD206 in the presence of miR-27a-loaded EVs, we reasoned that the increase in CD206 mediated by miR-27a might be responsible for the increased phagocytosis. We used mannan, a CD206 ligand, and anti-CD206 (α-CD206), a monoclonal antibody directed against CD206, to block the surface expression of CD206 on the monocytes and examined the effect of miR-27a-loaded EVs on naive monocytes (50). We observed that both mannan and α-CD206 treatment led to a significant decrease in the phagocytic activity of monocytes (Fig. 6, E and F). Thus, our results demonstrate the functional role of miR-27a present as a cargo in the EVs to mediate naive monocyte differentiation into M2 macrophages with an increase in IL-10 and TGF-β secretion and enhanced phagocytic capacity. These results indicate that the effects of EVs derived from ethanol-treated monocytes on the phenotype and function of naive monocytes is mediated primarily by miR-27a present in these alcohol EVs.

Increased Number of Circulating EVs Is Found in the Plasma of Alcoholic Hepatitis Patients with High Levels of miR-27a

Finally, to validate the in vivo relevance of our in vitro findings, we studied circulating EVs in the plasma of AH patients. We observed a significant increase in the levels of EVs in plasma of AH patients as compared with healthy controls as shown previously by our group (Fig. 7A) (30). Next, we investigated the level of miR-27a in the EVs from the AH patients and healthy controls. Importantly, we found a significant increase in the levels of miR-27a in the EVs of AH patients (Fig. 7B). We also observed increased IL-10 and TGFβ levels in the plasma of AH patients compared with healthy controls (Fig. 7, C and D). Thus, these in vivo results from AH patients mirror alcohol-induced changes in vitro.

FIGURE 7.
Increased level of miR-27a in alcoholic hepatitis patients is associated with increased IL-10 and TGF-β secretion from immune cells. A, number of EVs was measured in the plasma of healthy controls and AH patients using Nanosight. Exosomes were ...

Circulating EVs from Plasma of Patients with Alcoholic Hepatitis Polarize Naive Monocytes into an M2 Phenotype

To study the effect of circulating EVs from patients on naive monocytes, EVs isolated from plasma of AH patients and healthy donors were co-cultured with healthy naive monocytes. We observed a significant increase in CD206 and CD163 expression as well as a slight increase in CD68 and CD11c expression on the monocytes in the presence of EVs isolated from plasma AH patients compared with controls (Fig. 7E). There was no significant change in the expression of CD86 and CD16 (Fig. 7E). Furthermore, we found a significant increase in IL-10 secretion from the monocytes which were incubated with EVs from AH patients as compared with EVs from healthy controls (Fig. 7F). An increase in the phagocytic index in monocytes incubated with EVs from AH patients compared with controls further indicated the functional role of EVs in vivo (Fig. 7G).

Discussion

Innate immune cells, monocytes, and macrophages are targets of alcohol-induced immunomodulation and organ damage. Alcohol exposure regulates the production and function of signaling molecules that coordinate the immune response in ALD and influence the cross-talk between liver parenchymal and immune cells (10, 51). Interactions between immune cells can occur by direct cell-cell contact and/or cytokine production. EVs derived from different cell types have also been shown to act as signaling organelles (43, 52). Recent studies from our group and other groups have evaluated the biological significance of EVs and their miRNA cargo in intercellular communication and signaling (16, 43, 44). In this study, we investigated the biological relevance of a novel signaling mechanism between the monocytes in the presence of alcohol, involving the role of EV-associated miR-27a in this process. We show that the numbers of EVs released by monocytes are increased in the presence of alcohol and demonstrate that the EVs generated from alcohol-treated monocytes were effective in modulating the phenotype and function of naive monocytes. This in vitro discovery was further validated by our observation of increased numbers of EVs in the circulation of patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis where macrophage activation is a major pathogenic factor. We found that miR-27a was selectively enriched in EVs of alcohol-exposed monocytes, and this finding correlated with increased levels of miR-27a in circulating EVs of patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Furthermore, our investigations revealed a functional role of miR-27a in the induction of an M2 macrophage phenotype. Exosomes released from alcohol-exposed hepatocytes have been shown to selectively accumulate miR-122 (16). Here, we show that the increased levels of miR-27a in EVs from alcohol-treated monocytes were instrumental in inducing monocyte differentiation and M2 macrophage polarization in naive monocytes. We also found that EVs overexpressing miR-27a displayed high phagocytic activity, demonstrating for the first time the role of miR-27a in the process of phagocytosis. Our study demonstrates that the number of EVs released by human primary monocytes or THP-1 monocytic cells is increased with the incubation of the cells with alcohol. The treatment of naive monocytes with these alcohol EVs as well as from EVs from alcoholic hepatitis patients resulted in an increase in expression of M2-polarized macrophages as revealed by the increased CD206 and CD163 (M2 macrophage marker) expression.

Monocytes and macrophages are important players in the innate immune system during ALD. They are highly plastic, are heterogeneous in their phenotype and function, and are regulated by environmental cues to differentiate into macrophages and polarize. We have recently reported the role of alcohol in modulating monocyte differentiation into an M2-type macrophage phenotype (24). In vivo studies have also shown that patients suffering from alcoholic hepatitis have a presence of both M1 and M2 macrophages (53). Our results demonstrate that the EVs secreted from alcohol-exposed monocytes can signal and influence the monocyte phenotype and function and macrophage polarization even when the monocytes were not directly exposed to alcohol. We also observed increased phagocytic capacity of the M2 macrophages generated in the presence of alcohol EVs. Thus, these results bring forth an interesting phenomenon that suggests that monocyte-derived EVs most likely represent a unique and important mode of signaling during alcoholic liver disease.

The contents of the EVs derived from alcohol-treated monocytes revealed the presence of miRNAs as their cargo. The role of miRNAs has been documented in the process of hematopoiesis, differentiation, survival, and function of immune cells, including monocytes and macrophages (23, 54). Transfection of miR-29b, miR-125a-5p, or miR-155 mimics in THP-1 cells altered macrophage polarization to M1 macrophages (23). Experiments with human macrophages have identified unique miRNAs associated with polarized macrophage phenotypes such as miR-155 in M1 macrophages and miR-27a and miR-132 expression in M2 macrophages (20). We have recently reported that miR-27a was significantly up-regulated in primary monocytes cultured in the presence of alcohol (24). We also demonstrated that alcohol mediates miR-27a induction, which in turn leads to monocyte differentiation and macrophage polarization. In this study, we show that miR-27a induced by alcohol treatment of monocytes is packaged in EVs and released by these cells, which in turn can affect the naive phenotype and function of monocytes. A previous study had demonstrated that miR-223 transfer via microvesicles to monocytes induced differentiation into macrophages (55). In this study we provide evidence that the EVs from alcohol-treated monocytes have miR-27a-enriched cargo, and the functional effects of the alcohol EVs was demonstrated by increased macrophage markers, M2 markers, IL-10, and TGFβ secretion and increased phagocytosis by the naive monocytes. Similar effects on naive monocytes were observed when they were incubated with EVs overexpressing miR-27a. Additionally, overexpression of miR-27a in EVs increased CD16 expression and TNF-α secretion in naive monocytes, which were different as compared with alcohol EVs, demonstrating the complex composition of the alcohol EVs and that miR-27a may have other regulatory effects on monocytes.

In vivo analysis of EVs from acute alcoholic hepatitis patients revealed a significant increase in the circulating EV population as compared with healthy controls. Results from the analysis of circulating EVs derived from an AH patient's plasma showed high levels of miR-27a expression. Interestingly, the fold increase of miR-27a in the EVs from AH patients was almost 100-fold higher than that from the EVs of in vitro alcohol-treated monocytes, suggesting other potential cellular sources of miR-27a in vivo. Acute alcoholic hepatitis is characterized by overactivation of the pro-inflammatory cascade; thus the significant increase in miR-27a levels in the circulating EVs from AH patients, as compared with that of EVs from alcohol-exposed monocytes, suggests that in vivo miR-27a might play additional roles in alcoholic hepatitis.

The role of miRs in monocyte/macrophage phagocytosis is not well studied. miR-15a/16 has been shown to regulate macrophage phagocytosis after bacterial infection (49). miR-21 has also been shown to play a role in the process of engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages (56). In this study, we show that miR-27a overexpression in the EVs leads to increased phagocytic capacity of the M2 macrophages that were differentiated from naive monocytes. We showed that miR-27a mediated phagocytosis by up-regulating CD206, as inhibiting the up-regulation by mannan or anti-CD206 led to decreased phagocytosis. Studies have shown that increased mannose receptor expression, a C-type lectin expression, leads to increased phagocytic capacity of monocyte-derived DCs and macrophages (32, 33). Previous studies have shown that ethanol inhibits the phagocytic activity of macrophages (57, 58). Thus, the increased generation of M2 macrophages with high phagocytic capacity in response to alcohol EVs may represent the next generation of macrophages that are generated when the alcohol is metabolized. EVs from alcohol-exposed monocytes still remain in the system to signal to naive monocytes, and this might be a survival mechanism for the monocytes/macrophages.

Our data suggest that EV cargos from alcohol-treated monocytes can signal and communicate with naive monocytes. miR-27a plays an important role in this process. Because EVs function as an important method of cellular communication during diseases, it will be interesting to further explore the therapeutic potential of the EVs during alcoholic liver disease. Our in vivo data from alcoholic hepatitis patients suggest an important role of miR-27a in the circulating EVs during ALD. The data suggest that miR-27a is not only important for macrophage differentiation and polarization, but it may also have other regulatory roles during ALD, which is beyond the scope of this study. Our study highlights a novel communication via EVs between immune cells in the presence of ethanol. Thus, further studies of the molecular mechanisms underlying cell-cell communication via the EVs will facilitate a better understanding of the effects of alcohol on the immune cells.

Author Contributions

B. S., F. M. H., and G. S. conceived and designed the experiments. B. S., F. M. H., and K. K. performed the experiments. B. S., F. M. H., and G. S. analyzed and interpreted the data. G. S. contributed reagents/materials. B. S. and G. S. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

*This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01AA011576 UO1, AA021907 UO1, and AA021893 (to G. S.) and the Defeat Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis (DASH) consortium. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

3The abbreviations used are:

EV
extracellular vesicle
AH
alcoholic hepatitis
ALD
alcoholic liver disease
EtOH
ethanol
MFI
mean fluorescence intensity
MV
microvesicles
miRNA/miR
microRNA
NTA
nanoparticle tracking analysis
qPCR
quantitative PCR.

References

1. Ratajczak J., Wysoczynski M., Hayek F., Janowska-Wieczorek A., and Ratajczak M. Z. (2006) Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia 20, 1487–1495 [PubMed]
2. Kalra H., Simpson R. J., Ji H., Aikawa E., Altevogt P., Askenase P., Bond V. C., Borràs F. E., Breakefield X., Budnik V., Buzas E., Camussi G., Clayton A., Cocucci E., Falcon-Perez J. M., et al. (2012) Vesiclepedia: a compendium for extracellular vesicles with continuous community annotation. PLos Biol. 10, e1001450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Momen-Heravi F., Balaj L., Alian S., Mantel P. Y., Halleck A. E., Trachtenberg A. J., Soria C. E., Oquin S., Bonebreak C. M., Saracoglu E., Skog J., and Kuo W. P. (2013) Current methods for the isolation of extracellular vesicles. Biol. Chem. 394, 1253–1262 [PubMed]
4. Momen-Heravi F., Bala S., Bukong T., and Szabo G. (2014) Exosome-mediated delivery of functionally active miRNA-155 inhibitor to macrophages. Nanomedicine 10, 1517–1527 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Pap E. (2011) The role of microvesicles in malignancies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 714, 183–199 [PubMed]
6. György B., Szabó T. G., Pásztói M., Pál Z., Misják P., Aradi B., László V., Pállinger E., Pap E., Kittel A., Nagy G., Falus A., and Buzás E. I. (2011) Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2667–2688 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. El Gazzar M., and McCall C. E. (2012) MicroRNAs regulatory networks in myeloid lineage development and differentiation: regulators of the regulators. Immunol. Cell Biol. 90, 587–593 [PubMed]
8. Taylor D. D., and Gercel-Taylor C. (2013) The origin, function, and diagnostic potential of RNA within extracellular vesicles present in human biological fluids. Front. Genet. 4, 142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. de Vrij J., Maas S. L., Kwappenberg K. M., Schnoor R., Kleijn A., Dekker L., Luider T. M., de Witte L. D., Litjens M., van Strien M. E., Hol E. M., Kroonen J., Robe P. A., Lamfers M. L., Schilham M. W., and Broekman M. L. (2015) Glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles modify the phenotype of monocytic cells. Int. J. Cancer 137, 1630–1642 [PubMed]
10. Mandrekar P., and Ambade A. (2012) in Cellular Signaling Pathways in Alcoholic Liver Disease, Trends in Alcoholic Liver Disease Research–Clinical and Scientific Aspects (Shimizu I., editor. , ed) 10.5772/27412 [Cross Ref]
11. Gao B., and Bataller R. (2011) Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology 141, 1572–1585 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Szabo G. (2015) Gut-liver axis in alcoholic liver disease. Gastroenterology 148, 30–36 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Beier J. I., and McClain C. J. (2010) Mechanisms and cell signaling in alcoholic liver disease. Biol. Chem. 391, 1249–1264 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Louvet A., and Mathurin P. (2015) Alcoholic liver disease: mechanisms of injury and targeted treatment. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12, 231–242 [PubMed]
15. Bala S., Petrasek J., Mundkur S., Catalano D., Levin I., Ward J., Alao H., Kodys K., and Szabo G. (2012) Circulating microRNAs in exosomes indicate hepatocyte injury and inflammation in alcoholic, drug-induced, and inflammatory liver diseases. Hepatology 56, 1946–1957 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Momen-Heravi F., Bala S., Kodys K., and Szabo G. (2015) Exosomes derived from alcohol-treated hepatocytes horizontally transfer liver specific miRNA-122 and sensitize monocytes to LPS. Sci. Rep. 5, 9991. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Mosser D. M., and Edwards J. P. (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 958–969 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Martinez F. O., and Gordon S. (2014) The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 6, 13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Sica A., and Mantovani A. (2012) Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 787–795 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Graff J. W., Dickson A. M., Clay G., McCaffrey A. P., and Wilson M. E. (2012) Identifying functional microRNAs in macrophages with polarized phenotypes. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21816–21825 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. O'Connell R. M., Rao D. S., Chaudhuri A. A., and Baltimore D. (2010) Physiological and pathological roles for microRNAs in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 111–122 [PubMed]
22. Zhang Y., Zhang M., Zhong M., Suo Q., and Lv K. (2013) Expression profiles of miRNAs in polarized macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Med. 31, 797–802 [PubMed]
23. Sharbati S., Sharbati J., Hoeke L., Bohmer M., and Einspanier R. (2012) Quantification and accurate normalisation of small RNAs through new custom RT-qPCR arrays demonstrates Salmonella-induced microRNAs in human monocytes. BMC Genomics 13, 23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Saha B., Bruneau J. C., Kodys K., and Szabo G. (2015) Alcohol-induced miR-27a regulates differentiation and M2 macrophage polarization of normal human monocytes. J. Immun. 194, 3079–3087 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Arroyo J. D., Chevillet J. R., Kroh E. M., Ruf I. K., Pritchard C. C., Gibson D. F., Mitchell P. S., Bennett C. F., Pogosova-Agadjanyan E. L., Stirewalt D. L., Tait J. F., and Tewari M. (2011) Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 5003–5008 [PubMed]
26. Guay C., Menoud V., Rome S., and Regazzi R. (2015) Horizontal transfer of exosomal microRNAs transduce apoptotic signals between pancreatic beta-cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 13, 17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Landmann R., Ludwig C., Obrist R., and Obrecht J. P. (1991) Effect of cytokines and lipopolysaccharide on CD14 antigen expression in human monocytes and macrophages. J. Cell. Biochem. 47, 317–329 [PubMed]
28. Bala S., Csak T., Momen-Heravi F., Lippai D., Kodys K., Catalano D., Satishchandran A., Ambros V., and Szabo G. (2015) Biodistribution and function of extracellular miRNA-155 in mice. Sci. Rep. 5, 10721. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. O'Shea R. S., Dasarathy S., McCullough A. J., Practice Guideline Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology (2010) Alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 51, 307–328 [PubMed]
30. Momen-Heravi F., Saha B., Kodys K., Catalano D., Satishchandran A., and Szabo G. (2015) Increased number of circulating exosomes and their microRNA cargos are potential novel biomarkers in alcoholic hepatitis. J. Transl. Med. 13, 261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Zhang S., Kodys K., Li K., and Szabo G. (2013) Human type 2 myeloid dendritic cells produce interferon-λ and amplify interferon-α in response to hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterology 144, 414–425 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Op den Brouw M. L., Binda R. S., Geijtenbeek T. B., Janssen H. L., and Woltman A. M. (2009) The mannose receptor acts as hepatitis B virus surface antigen receptor mediating interaction with intrahepatic dendritic cells. Virology 393, 84–90 [PubMed]
33. Piemonti L., Monti P., Allavena P., Leone B. E., Caputo A., and Di Carlo V. (1999) Glucocorticoids increase the endocytic activity of human dendritic cells. Int. Immunol. 11, 1519–1526 [PubMed]
34. Malathi K., Dong B., Gale M. Jr., and Silverman R. H. (2007) Small self-RNA generated by RNase L amplifies antiviral innate immunity. Nature 448, 816–819 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Stuart L. M., and Ezekowitz R. A. (2005) Phagocytosis: elegant complexity. Immunity 22, 539–550 [PubMed]
36. Wang Z., Fayngerts S., Wang P., Sun H., Johnson D. S., Ruan Q., Guo W., and Chen Y. H. (2012) TIPE2 protein serves as a negative regulator of phagocytosis and oxidative burst during infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15413–15418 [PubMed]
37. McClain C. J., Hill D. B., Song Z., Deaciuc I., and Barve S. (2002) Monocyte activation in alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol 27, 53–61 [PubMed]
38. Szabo G., Petrasek J., and Bala S. (2012) Innate immunity and alcoholic liver disease. Dig. Dis. 30, 55–60 [PubMed]
39. Bala S., Marcos M., Gattu A., Catalano D., and Szabo G. (2014) Acute binge drinking increases serum endotoxin and bacterial DNA levels in healthy individuals. PLoS ONE 9, e96864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Szabo G., Catalano D., Bellerose G., and Mandrekar P. (2001) Interferon α and alcohol augment nuclear regulatory factor-κB activation in HepG2 cells, and interferon α increases pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 25, 1188–1197 [PubMed]
41. Qin Z. (2012) The use of THP-1 cells as a model for mimicking the function and regulation of monocytes and macrophages in the vasculature. Atherosclerosis 221, 2–11 [PubMed]
42. Daigneault M., Preston J. A., Marriott H. M., Whyte M. K., and Dockrell D. H. (2010) The identification of markers of macrophage differentiation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS ONE 5, e8668. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Raposo G., and Stoorvogel W. (2013) Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 200, 373–383 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Campos J., Soares R., Ribeiro K., Andrade A., Batista W., and Torrecilhas A. (2015) Extracellular vesicles: role in inflammatory responses and potential uses in vaccination in cancer and infectious diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 10.1155/2015/832 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Silva M. T. (2010) When two is better than one: macrophages and neutrophils work in concert in innate immunity as complementary and cooperative partners of a myeloid phagocyte system. J. Leukocyte Biol. 87, 93–106 [PubMed]
46. Bazzoni F., Rossato M., Fabbri M., Gaudiosi D., Mirolo M., Mori L., Tamassia N., Mantovani A., Cassatella M. A., and Locati M. (2009) Induction and regulatory function of miR-9 in human monocytes and neutrophils exposed to proinflammatory signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 5282–5287 [PubMed]
47. Etzrodt M., Cortez-Retamozo V., Newton A., Zhao J., Ng A., Wildgruber M., Romero P., Wurdinger T., Xavier R., Geissmann F., Meylan E., Nahrendorf M., Swirski F. K., Baltimore D., Weissleder R., and Pittet M. J. (2012) Regulation of monocyte functional heterogeneity by miR-146a and Relb. Cell Rep. 1, 317–324 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Naqvi A. R., Fordham J. B., and Nares S. (2015) miR-24, miR-30b, and miR-142–3p regulate phagocytosis in myeloid inflammatory cells. J. Immunol. 194, 1916–1927 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Moon H. G., Yang J., Zheng Y., and Jin Y. (2014) miR-15a/16 regulates macrophage phagocytosis after bacterial infection. J. Immunol. 193, 4558–4567 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Ampel N. M., Nelson D. K., Li L., Dionne S. O., Lake D. F., Simmons K. A., and Pappagianis D. (2005) The mannose receptor mediates the cellular immune response in human coccidioidomycosis. Infect. Immun. 73, 2554–2555 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Szabo G. (1997) Alcohol's contribution to compromised immunity. Alcohol Health Res. World. 21, 30–41 [PubMed]
52. Julich H., Willms A., Lukacs-Kornek V., and Kornek M. (2014) Extracellular vesicle profiling and their use as potential disease specific biomarker. Front. Immunol. 5, 413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Lee J., French B., Morgan T., and French S. W. (2014) The liver is populated by a broad spectrum of markers for macrophages. In alcoholic hepatitis the macrophages are M1 and M2. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 96, 118–125 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Undi R. B., Kandi R., and Gutti R. K. (2013) MicroRNAs as haematopoiesis regulators. Adv. Hematol. 2013, 695754. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Ismail N., Wang Y., Dakhlallah D., Moldovan L., Agarwal K., Batte K., Shah P., Wisler J., Eubank T. D., Tridandapani S., Paulaitis M. E., Piper M. G., and Marsh C. B. (2013) Macrophage microvesicles induce macrophage differentiation and miR-223 transfer. Blood 121, 984–995 [PubMed]
56. Das A., Ganesh K., Khanna S., Sen C. K., and Roy S. (2014) Engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages: a role of microRNA-21 in the resolution of wound inflammation. J. Immunol. 192, 1120–1129 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Karavitis J., Murdoch E. L., Deburghgraeve C., Ramirez L., and Kovacs E. J. (2012) Ethanol suppresses phagosomal adhesion maturation, Rac activation, and subsequent actin polymerization during FcγR-mediated phagocytosis. Cell. Immunol. 274, 61–71 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Karavitis J., and Kovacs E. J. (2011) Macrophage phagocytosis: effects of environmental pollutants, alcohol, cigarette smoke, and other external factors. J. Leukocyte Biol. 90, 1065–1078 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology