PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Atherosclerosis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4567041
NIHMSID: NIHMS674224

Iron, Inflammation and Atherosclerosis Risk in Men vs. Perimenopausal Women

Abstract

Objective

Age at first atherosclerotic event is typically older for women vs. men; monthly iron loss has been postulated to contribute to this advantage. We investigated the relationship between an MRI-based arterial wall biomarker and the serum inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in perimenopausal women vs. men.

Methods and Results

Women without evident atherosclerotic disease were prospectively enrolled and observed over 24 months of menopause transition, indicated by hormone levels and reduction in median number of menstrual cycles from 4 [3 – 6] per year to 0 [0 – 1] per year (P<0.01). Higher hsCRP predicted shorter carotid artery wall T2* in women entering the menopause transition (r=−0.3139, P=0.0014); this relationship weakened after 24 months of perimenopause in women (r=−0.1718, P=0.0859) and was not significant in a cohort of men matched for age and cardiovascular risk category (r=−0.0310, P=0.8362). Serum ferritin increased from baseline to 24-month follow-up during women’s menopause transition (37 [20–79] to 67 [36–97] ng/mL, P<0.01), but still remained lower compared to men (111 [45–220] ng/mL, P<0.01). Circulating ferritin levels correlated with arterial wall T2* values in women at baseline (r=−0.3163, P=0.0013) but not in women after 24 months (r=−0.0730, P=0.4684) of menopause transition nor in men (r=0.0862, P=0.5644).

Conclusions

An arterial wall iron-based imaging biomarker reflects degree of systemic inflammation in younger women, whereas this relationship is lost as women transition through menopause to become more similar to men. Iron homeostasis and inflammation in the arterial wall microenvironment warrants further investigation as a potential early target for interventions that mitigate atherosclerosis risk.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, women, magnetic resonance imaging, iron, risk factors

Introduction

Atherosclerosis causes the vast majority of acute coronary and cerebrovascular syndromes. While it affects both men and women, heart disease and stroke statistics have consistently shown a 10–20 year lag in first atherosclerotic event for women compared to men1. Furthermore, the incidence of heart attack and stroke increases after menopause beyond that predicted by chronologic age2. Both the Framingham Heart Study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) indicate that early menopause increases atherosclerotic events3, 4.

Women experience a rapid decline in sex steroid exposure with menopause. However, randomised trials have shown that hormone therapy provides inconsistent cardiovascular risk reduction57 and even increased risk of stroke810. A less-explored alternate hypothesis to explain relative lag in events for women vs. men is that monthly iron loss prior to menopause is cardioprotective11. Iron excess accelerates, while iron restriction attenuates, atheroma formation in animals12, 13 and humans14. Iron-generated free radicals oxidise LDL via Fenton chemistry15, 16, and LDL modification leads to foam cell production17.

Just as carotid ultrasound-based intima medial thickness (cIMT) has been widely used in studies of atherosclerosis risk19, non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid artery wall offers high reproducibility20, agreement with cIMT21, 22 and prognostic value23 while offering unique tissue characterization approaches. For instance, the MRI relaxation parameter T2* can accurately estimate iron in liver and myocardium24, 25, whereas serum measures such as ferritin do not reliably predict tissue iron content.26 Our group has developed T2* mapping for the carotid artery wall and applied it to analyze both disease-free as well as atherosclerotic arteries, the latter providing histopathological evidence of T2* as a marker of arterial wall iron2729. In this study, we incorporated this arterial wall imaging biomarker into a prospective study of perimenopausal women with atherosclerosis risk factors. We hypothesized that i) shorter carotid artery T2* correlates with higher levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in men and women at risk of atherosclerosis and ii) iron serologies do not consistently predict tissue-specific iron-based imaging measures.

Methods

Study Population

Women over the age of 40 reporting 1 to 6 menstrual cycles in the year prior to enrolment were prospectively identified via community advertisements as well as through a primary care-targeted, electronic health record (EHR) query. A group of men matched by age and Framingham risk score category (low, intermediate, high30) was identified through a similar primary care EHR query. Recorded risk factors for perimenopausal women and age/risk-matched men included: hyperlipidaemia (total cholesterol ≥240mg/dL), hypertension (diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or on medications for hypertension), smoking, and treated diabetes. Excluded from enrolment were individuals with clinically-apparent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, prior acute coronary syndrome, exertional angina or equivalent, prior coronary revascularization, anaemia, bleeding disorder, regular blood donation, known abnormality of iron metabolism, or unwillingness to not donate blood during the study. To avoid the confounding effect of chronic kidney disease on iron homeostasis, subjects with GFR ≤ 40 mL/min/m2 were excluded. Presence of any MRI contraindication (e.g. incompatible implant) also precluded enrolment. Female subjects who were pregnant or taking hormone therapy were not enrolled. The university’s Institutional Review Board approved the study, compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate.

Clinical and Laboratory Data

Laboratory measurement at baseline for men and women and again for women after 2 years included serum creatinine, hsCRP, lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides, calculated low-density lipoprotein [LDL]), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and iron serologies (ferritin, total iron binding capacity, transferrin and iron saturation). Subjects’ 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores were computed based on clinical and laboratory values per recently published guidelines31. Estradiol was quantified in serum by radioimmuno-assay (RIA) methods32, 33. Analysis of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) used a chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Free estradiol was calculated using the measured total estradiol levels and SHBG concentrations as well as an average assumed concentration for albumin3436.

Non-contrast Carotid Artery MRI

Female subjects underwent non-contrast MRI of bilateral carotid arteries at baseline and 2-year follow-up on the identical 3 Tesla scanner (Verio, Siemens) using a custom built 8-element (4 left and 4 right) carotid coil for carotid imaging (Massachusetts General Hospital); male subjects underwent the same imaging protocol. Three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight imaging was used to localise the carotid arteries followed by 5–7 minutes of 3D T1-weighted (T1W) dark blood imaging using a 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence37 optimised for carotid artery wall imaging38. Multi-slice, multi-echo gradient echo acquisitions for T2* mapping were subsequently obtained perpendicular to the vessel axis in both common carotid arteries (CCA) just proximal to the carotid bulb and then in both internal carotid arteries (ICA) at 5 mm and 2.5 mm distal to the bifurcation (6 slices per MRI)39.

Image Analysis

Carotid artery wall volume was measured from the 3D T1W TSE scan, from which contiguous multi-planar reformatted images were generated perpendicular to the right and left CCA and ICA (Fig. 1). Five consecutive 1 mm-thick slices were generated with the first slice starting at just below the carotid bulb (for CCA) and at the carotid bifurcation (for ICA). From the T2* acquisition, custom software (MATLAB) was used to fit a monoexponential decay curve at each pixel location using a neighborhood weighted least squares model and compute arterial wall T2* for each slice28. T2* values were then averaged across all 6 slices for each subject’s MRI. Repeat vessel wall T2* computation in 80 studies by two independent observers confirmed excellent inter-reader reliability (Fig. 2). Vessel wall area was calculated by subtracting lumen area from the outer border enclosed area. Carotid wall volume for each of four locations (right CCA/ICA, left CCA/ICA) was calculated by multiplying the sum of the five slice wall areas by slice thickness, and total carotid artery wall volume was the sum of these 4 volumes. Wall volume normalized to height was also computed. Repeat wall volume measurements in 70 studies by two independent observers showed excellent agreement (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
Carotid Artery Wall Volume Measurement
Figure 2
Interobserver Agreement in Carotid Artery Wall T2* and Wall Volume

Statistical Analysis

Median values of continuous clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared between women and men using the Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were applied for categorical variables. Furthermore, changes in clinical characteristics over 2-year follow-up were also analysed for women using Wilcoxon signed rank tests for continuous outcomes. The correlation between continuous variables was computed with the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Data were analysed using Stata 13.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

Of 127 women enrolled, 24 did not complete 2-year follow-up visits and 2 additional women had excessive motion artefact precluding use of their carotid images. Of 50 men enrolled, artefact precluded use of carotid images in 3. Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the final study cohort that consisted of 101 women and 47 men. Laboratory findings are summarised in Table 2.

Table 1
Baseline Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of the Study Cohort
Table 2
Blood Measurements

Number of menstrual cycles in the prior 12 months significantly decreased from a median of 4 [3 – 6] at baseline to 0 [0 – 1] at 24-month follow-up (P<0.). FSH increased significantly over 24 months (Table 2). The frequency of major risk factors did not change significantly over the follow-up period. Serum ferritin increased over 24 months for women, and was significantly lower in women vs. men at baseline (P<0.01).

In women, baseline carotid artery T2* was inversely related to hsCRP (r=−0.3139, P =0.0014). This relationship weakened after 24 months of menopause transition (r=−0.1718, P=0.0859), and was not present in men (r=−0.0310, P=0.8362, Fig. 3). Similarly, higher levels of serum ferritin predicted shorter carotid artery T2* in women at baseline (r=−0.3163, P=0.0013); this relationship attenuated over 24 months of menopause transition (r=−0.0730, P=0.4684) and was not significant in men of similar age and risk category (r=0.0862, P=0.5644, Fig. 4).

Figure 3
Arterial Wall MRI vs. Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Perimenopausal Women vs. Men

Higher ASCVD risk scores predicted higher hsCRP levels only in women at 24 months of menopause transition (r=0.2083, P=0.0476), but not in women (r=0.0053, P=0.9600) or men (r=0.1127, P=0.4946) at baseline. The correlation between ASCVD risk scores and arterial wall T2* values was not significant in any group (P>0.47 in women or men at baseline as well as women at 24 months).

Discussion

This study represents the first examination of iron homeostasis using in vivo arterial wall biomarkers in perimenopausal women in comparison to age- and risk-matched men. We found that in women entering the menopause transition, an iron-based non-invasive arterial wall MRI biomarker correlated with hsCRP, an established systemic marker of inflammation and atherosclerosis risk. This relationship diminished over 2 years of perimenopause, and was absent in men of similar age and cardiovascular risk profile. An increase in iron balance in women transitioning through menopause was supported by an increase in ferritin levels. Arterial wall volume, previously shown to be increased in the presence of atherosclerosis and predictive for cardiovascular events, was lower in perimenopausal women compared to men.

The association of hsCRP with shortened T2*, traditionally used to indicate increased iron content in myocardium and hepatic tissue, underscores the link between iron and inflammation. Considerable experimental evidence supports this link, from iron’s role in LDL oxidation via Fenton chemistry to accelerated uptake of oxidised LDL by macrophages to form foam cells that, in turn, promote atheroma progression40, 41. In a recent post-hoc analysis of the Iron in Atherosclerosis Study (FeAST), ferritin reduction –not lipid changes– with statin therapy plus phlebotomy paralleled reduced mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with established peripheral arterial disease42, suggesting that statin’s pleotropic effects may occur via iron and inflammation43.

In a randomised clinical trial, chelation therapy reduced total mortality and atherosclerotic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with established coronary heart disease44. Dietary modification may be a more feasible intervention for at-risk individuals, noting that consumption of red meat, a large source of dietary iron, increases atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events45, 46. Collectively, these data make it difficult to dismiss iron in the plaque microenvironment as a reasonable target for cardiovascular risk reduction.

While ferritin increased, its correlation with arterial wall T2* values diminished over the menopause transition. These findings suggest that iron homeostasis may have a role via inflammation early in subclinical arterial wall dynamics in patients at risk, but less so as women’s iron profiles become similar to those of men. Prior studies of serum ferritin, transferrin and TIBC have shown an inconsistent correlation with atherosclerosis risk47; similarly, serum ferritin is an unreliable predictor of tissue iron by T2* quantification in patients with myocardial iron overload48. Together, these data remind us that changes in total body iron vs. local tissue iron homeostasis reflect distinct processes.

While data from Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis did not find an association between estradiol levels and measures of subclinical arterial disease such as cIMT and coronary artery calcium score49, other studies suggest that HT favorably impacts subclinical coronary calcification5. Mechanistic data also suggest that calcium may defend against plaque destabilization by excluding intra-lesion iron50. Heterogeneity in hormone therapy trial results plus our findings behoove an integrated approach that considers iron balance as well as ovarian hormones in understanding sex differences in atherosclerosis.

Limitations

A direct mechanistic link between iron accrual and atherosclerosis initiation cannot be established with these observational data. However, the distinct sex-specific correlations between systemic inflammation and changing iron homeostasis through perimenopause make a compelling case to further investigate iron accrual’s role in atherosclerosis initiation. Measuring oxidised LDL might further illuminate potential mechanistic links between iron and excess atherosclerosis. Carotid IMT was not included in this protocol in favor of a volumetric approach to measure arterial wall disease; several studies comparing cIMT to MRI measurements indicate similar measurements with greater reproducibility using the MR-based volumetric approach2022.

Conclusions

An iron-sensitive tissue biomarker measured in the arterial wall reflects systemic inflammation early in perimenopausal women but less so as menopause transition progresses and not in men. Further preclinical and clinical studies that investigate iron and inflammation in atherosclerosis initiation and progression may help identify novel interventions to reduce the burden of atherosclerosis in both women and men at risk.

  • Iron balance differences may influence atherosclerosis incidence in women vs. men.
  • A magnetic resonance arterial wall biomarker sensitive to endogenous iron was used.
  • Arterial wall MRI-T2* paralleled hsCRP in early but not later menopause nor in men.
  • Ferritin’s link to MRI-T2* in women was lost after 2 years and was absent in men.
  • Targeting iron homeostasis to lower incident atherosclerosis warrants further study.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. National Institute of Health (grant number HL095563 to S.V.R.) and National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences (grant numbers 8UL1TR000090-05, 8KL2TR000112-05, and 8TL1TR000091-05).

The authors thank the women and men who participated in this study.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: Drs. Raman and Simonetti receive research support from Siemens. Dr. Raman receives research support from Novartis. Dr. Jackson receives research support from Pfizer.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres J, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2015 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2014 [PubMed]
2. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. Risk factors that attenuate the female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:57–61. [PubMed]
3. Lisabeth LD, Beiser AS, Brown DL, Murabito JM, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA. Age at natural menopause and risk of ischemic stroke: The framingham heart study. Stroke. 2009;40:1044–1049. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Wellons M, Ouyang P, Schreiner PJ, Herrington DM, Vaidya D. Early menopause predicts future coronary heart disease and stroke: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Menopause. 2012;19:1081–1087. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, Carr JJ, Langer RD, Hsia J, Kuller LH, Cochrane BB, Hunt JR, Ludlam SE, Pettinger MB, Gass M, Margolis KL, Nathan L, Ockene JK, Prentice RL, Robbins J, Stefanick ML. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;356:2591–2602. [PubMed]
6. Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL, Aragaki A, Beresford SA, Brzyski R, Chlebowski RT, Gass M, LaCroix A, Manson JE, Prentice RL, Rossouw J, Stefanick ML. Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin. JAMA. 2008;299:1036–1045. [PubMed]
7. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, Rossouw JE, Assaf AR, Lasser NL, Trevisan M, Black HR, Heckbert SR, Detrano R, Strickland OL, Wong ND, Crouse JR, Stein E, Cushman M. Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349:523–534. [PubMed]
8. Wassertheil-Smoller S, Hendrix SL, Limacher M, Heiss G, Kooperberg C, Baird A, Kotchen T, Curb JD, Black H, Rossouw JE, Aragaki A, Safford M, Stein E, Laowattana S, Mysiw WJ. Effect of estrogen plus progestin on stroke in postmenopausal women: The women’s health initiative: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2673–2684. [PubMed]
9. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative I. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. [PubMed]
10. Grodstein F, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rexrode K. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and stroke: Role of time since menopause and age at initiation of hormone therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:861–866. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Sullivan JL. Iron and the sex difference in heart disease risk. Lancet. 1981;1:1293–1294. [PubMed]
12. Araujo J, Romano E, Brito B, Parthe V, Romano M, Bracho M, Montano R, Cardier J. Iron overload augments the development of atherosclerotic lesions in rabbits. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1995;15:1172–1180. [PubMed]
13. Lee TS, Shiao MS, Pan CC, Chau LY. Iron-deficient diet reduces atherosclerotic lesions in apoe-deficient mice. Circulation. 1999;99:1222–1229. [PubMed]
14. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, Farb A, Guerrero LJ, Hayase M, Kutys R, Narula J, Finn AV, Virmani R. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349:2316–2325. [PubMed]
15. Agil A, Fuller CJ, Jialal I. Susceptibility of plasma to ferrous iron/hydrogen peroxide-mediated oxidation: Demonstration of a possible fenton reaction. Clin Chem. 1995;41:220–225. [PubMed]
16. Klouche K, Morena M, Canaud B, Descomps B, Beraud JJ, Cristol JP. Mechanism of in vitro heme-induced ldl oxidation: Effects of antioxidants. Eur J Clin Invest. 2004;34:619–625. [PubMed]
17. Choudhury RP, Lee JM, Greaves DR. Mechanisms of disease: Macrophage-derived foam cells emerging as therapeutic targets in atherosclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:309–315. [PubMed]
18. Cheung YF, Chan GCF, Ha SY. Arterial stiffness and endothelial function in patients with β-thalassemia major. Circulation. 2002;106:2561–2566. [PubMed]
19. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK., Jr Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular health study collaborative research group. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;340:14–22. [PubMed]
20. Varghese A, Crowe LA, Mohiaddin RH, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Nott DM, McCall JM, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ. Interstudy reproducibility of three-dimensional volume-selective fast spin echo magnetic resonance for quantifying carotid artery wall volume. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:187–191. [PubMed]
21. Boussel L, Serusclat A, Skilton MR, Vincent F, Bernard S, Moulin P, Saloner D, Douek PC. The reliability of high resolution mri in the measurement of early stage carotid wall thickening. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2007;9:771–776. [PubMed]
22. Mani V, Aguiar SH, Itskovich VV, Weinshelbaum KB, Postley JE, Wasenda EJ, Aguinaldo JG, Samber DD, Fayad ZA. Carotid black blood mri burden of atherosclerotic disease assessment correlates with ultrasound intima-media thickness. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2006;8:529–534. [PubMed]
23. Wannarong T, Parraga G, Buchanan D, Fenster A, House AA, Hackam DG, Spence JD. Progression of carotid plaque volume predicts cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2013;44:1859–1865. [PubMed]
24. Carpenter JP, He T, Kirk P, Roughton M, Anderson LJ, de Noronha SV, Sheppard MN, Porter JB, Walker JM, Wood JC, Galanello R, Forni G, Catani G, Matta G, Fucharoen S, Fleming A, House MJ, Black G, Firmin DN, St Pierre TG, Pennell DJ. On t2* magnetic resonance and cardiac iron. Circulation. 2011;123:1519–1528. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Brewer CJ, Coates TD, Wood JC. Spleen r2 and r2* in iron-overloaded patients with sickle cell disease and thalassemia major. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI. 2009;29:357–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, Prescott E, Charrier CC, Bunce NH, Firmin DN, Wonke B, Porter J, Walker JM, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular t2-star (t2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2171–2179. [PubMed]
27. Raman SV, Winner MW, III, Tran T, Velayutham M, Simonetti OP, Baker PB, Olesik J, McCarthy B, Ferketich AK, Zweier JL. In vivo atherosclerotic plaque characterization using magnetic susceptibility distinguishes symptom-producing plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:49–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Sharkey-Toppen TP, Mihai G, Maiseyeu A, Tran T, Clymer BD, Simonetti OP, Raman SV. Improved in vivo human carotid artery wall t2* estimation. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2013;31:44–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Winner MW, 3rd, Sharkey-Toppen T, Zhang X, Pennell ML, Simonetti OP, Zweier JL, Vaccaro PS, Raman SV. Iron and noncontrast magnetic resonance t2* as a marker of intraplaque iron in human atherosclerosis. Journal of vascular surgery. 2014 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. D’Agostino RB, Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel WB. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–753. [PubMed]
31. Goff DC, Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O’Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Jr, Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PW. 2013 acc/aha guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73. [PubMed]
32. Probst-Hensch NM, Ingles SA, Diep AT, Haile RW, Stanczyk FZ, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE. Aromatase and breast cancer susceptibility. Endocrine-related cancer. 1999;6:165–173. [PubMed]
33. Goebelsmann UBG, Gale JA, Kletzky OA, Nakamura RM, Coulson AH, Korelitz JJ. Serum gonadotropin, testosterone, estradiol and estrone levels prior to and following bilateral vasectomy. In: Lepow IHCR, editor. Vasectomy: Immunologic and pathophysiologic effects in animals and man. New York: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 165–175.
34. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM. A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:3666–3672. [PubMed]
35. Sodergard R, Backstrom T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H. Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17 beta to human plasma proteins at body temperature. Journal of steroid biochemistry. 1982;16:801–810. [PubMed]
36. Rinaldi S, Geay A, Dechaud H, Biessy C, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Akhmedkhanov A, Shore RE, Riboli E, Toniolo P, Kaaks R. Validity of free testosterone and free estradiol determinations in serum samples from postmenopausal women by theoretical calculations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1065–1071. [PubMed]
37. Mugler JP, 3rd, Bao S, Mulkern RV, Guttmann CR, Robertson RL, Jolesz FA, Brookeman JR. Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo mr imaging of the brain. Radiology. 2000;216:891–899. [PubMed]
38. Mihai G, Winner MW, Raman SV, Rajagopalan S, Simonetti OP, Chung YC. Assessment of carotid stenosis using three-dimensional t2-weighted dark blood imaging: Initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:449–455. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Mihai G, He X, Zhang X, McCarthy B, Tran T, Pennell M, Blank J, Simonetti OP, Jackson RD, Raman SV. Design and rationale for the atudy of changes in iron and atherosclerosis risk in perimenopause. Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology. 2011;2:152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Hansson GK. Atherosclerosis--an immune disease: The anitschkov lecture 2007. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:2–10. [PubMed]
41. Nagy E, Eaton JW, Jeney V, Soares MP, Varga Z, Galajda Z, Szentmiklosi J, Mehes G, Csonka T, Smith A, Vercellotti GM, Balla G, Balla J. Red cells, hemoglobin, heme, iron, and atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1347–1353. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Zacharski LR, Depalma RG, Shamayeva G, Chow BK. The statin-iron nexus: Anti-inflammatory intervention for arterial disease prevention. American journal of public health. 2013;103:e105–e112. [PubMed]
43. Mascitelli L, Goldstein MR. Might the beneficial effects of statin drugs be related to their action on iron metabolism? QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2012;105:1225–1229. [PubMed]
44. Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R, Mark DB, Rozema T, Nahin RL, Lindblad L, Lewis EF, Drisko J, Lee KL, Investigators T. Effect of disodium edta chelation regimen on cardiovascular events in patients with previous myocardial infarction: The tact randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1241–1250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. de Oliveira Otto MC, Alonso A, Lee DH, Delclos GL, Bertoni AG, Jiang R, Lima JA, Symanski E, Jacobs DR, Jr, Nettleton JA. Dietary intakes of zinc and heme iron from red meat, but not from other sources, are associated with greater risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. The Journal of nutrition. 2012;142:526–533. [PubMed]
46. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, Britt EB, Fu X, Wu Y, Li L, Smith JD, Didonato JA, Chen J, Li H, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Warrier M, Brown JM, Krauss RM, Tang WH, Bushman FD, Lusis AJ, Hazen SL. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nature medicine. 2013 Apr 7; doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. You SAWQ. Ferritin in atherosclerosis. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2005;357:1–16. [PubMed]
48. Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, Prescott E, Charrier CC, Bunce NH, Firmin DN, Wonke B, Porter J, Walker JM, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular t2-star (t2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. European Heart Journal. 2001;22:2171–2179. [PubMed]
49. Ouyang P, Vaidya D, Dobs A, Golden SH, Szklo M, Heckbert SR, Kopp P, Gapstur SM. Sex hormone levels and subclinical atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:255–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Rajendran R, Minqin R, Ronald JA, Rutt BK, Halliwell B, Watt F. Does iron inhibit calcification during atherosclerosis? Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:1675–1679. [PMC free article] [PubMed]