Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Environ Sci Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 July 21.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC4526136

Exposure to Deepwater Horizon Crude Oil Burnoff Particulate Matter Induces Pulmonary Inflammation and Alters Adaptive Immune Response


The ″in situ burning” of trapped crude oil on the surface of Gulf waters during the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill released numerous pollutants, including combustion-generated particulate matter (PM). Limited information is available on the respiratory impact of inhaled in situ burned oil sail particulate matter (OSPM). Here we utilized PM collected from in situ burn plumes of the DWH oil spill to study the acute effects of exposure to OSPM on pulmonary health. OSPM caused dose-and time-dependent cytotoxicity and generated reactive oxygen species and superoxide radicals in vitro. Additionally, mice exposed to OSPM exhibited significant decreases in body weight gain, systemic oxidative stress in the form of increased serum 8-isoprostane (8-IP) levels, and airway inflammation in the form of increased macrophages and eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Further, in a mouse model of allergic asthma, OSPM caused increased T helper 2 cells (Th2), peribronchiolar inflammation, and increased airway mucus production. These findings demonstrate that acute exposure to OSPM results in pulmonary inflammation and alteration of innate/adaptive immune responses in mice and highlight potential respiratory effects associated with cleaning up an oil spill.


An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms709131f6.jpg


The Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 is considered as the largest accidental marine oil spill in global history. An estimated 4.9 million barrels of crude oil were released into the Gulf waters.1 The released crude oil was contained from spreading in the Gulf waters by several methods, one of which was by means of surface booms and controlled burning of contained oil termed as “in situ” burning. Approximately 411 in situ burning operations were conducted to remove an estimated 5% of the total crude oil released.1 Though in situ burning facilitates rapid removal of oil from the surface of water, it releases numerous pollutants including PM into the surrounding atmosphere. In this particular burn, the oil was corralled by booms being pulled in parallel from two boats. The collected surface oil was then ignited by igniter boats via an incendiary starter charge containing gelled diesel in a plastic container and equipped with a foam flotation and road flare (Gullett et al., unpublished observation). The heat stress experienced by the personnel limited them from wearing proper protective respiratory equipment during the burning activities and many days involved multiple simultaneous burns with as many as 16 in situ burns conducted simultaneously on a single day burning as much as 50,000–70,000 barrels of oil. The collected oil was burned for times varying from minutes to hours depending on the sea/wind conditions. The longest of the burns took 11 h. and 48 min to dissipate (On Scene Coordinator Report Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 2011).

During the initial period of cleanup, reports surfaced in which cleanup participants reported several lower respiratory tract problems such as wheezing, tightness in the chest, shortness of breath, itchy or runny nose and throat lasting at least 3 days.2 Oil spill cleanup participants are often exposed to oil fumes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and/or combustion products from in situ burning of crude oil.3 Reports from previous oil-spill cleanup participants have indicated the persistence of respiratory symptoms such as bronchial hyperresponsiveness and increased levels of oxidative stress marker 8-isoprostane (8-IP) and vascular endothelial growth factor in exhaled breath of participants.4,5 However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated whether exposure to PM from in situ burning of crude oil has a potential to cause or exacerbate respiratory health effects. Combustion derived PM such as diesel exhaust particles (DEPs) are known to promote a T helper 2 (Th2) biased immunologic responses, usually associated with allergic asthma. Indeed, in the presence of allergens, DEPs were shown to exacerbate Th2 biased immunologic responses.6,7 The residual carbonaceous components of DEPs are known to contribute to oxidative stress due to the redox potential of quinone radicals.8 The initial chemical characterization studies of the particulate emissions from in situ burns of BP crude oil showed the PAHs accounted for roughly 4.5 mg/kg of oil burned (Gullett et al., unpublished observations). The presence of PAHs suggests a similar ability to induce oxidative stress.

Epidemiological evidence of association between exposure to particulate air pollution and adverse respiratory health effects has been well documented.911 Our previous studies using animal models of asthma have shown that exposure to combustion derived PM affects pulmonary immunologic homeostasis and leads to adverse respiratory health effects such as asthma.1214 Further, several studies have demonstrated the role of PM-induced oxidative stress in the exacerbation of asthma.15 Though there are numerous studies suggesting the risk of acute respiratory health effects due to exposure to particulate pollution,16 very few studies have specifically addressed the respiratory health effects due to exposure to in situ burned oil particulate matter (OSPM). Airborne pollutants such as residual oil fly ash are shown to enhance allergic pulmonary inflammation and exacerbate lung disease indicating air borne burnoff pollutants as important risk factors for asthma.17 Though limited information is available on the health effects of crude oil spills, epidemiological studies have shown increased prevalence of acute and prolonged respiratory health effects in oil spill cleanup workers and residents closer to the spill area.4,18 Epidemiological studies on respiratory health effects of previous crude oil spills have demonstrated increased prevalence of asthma in residents and children living near the spill area suggesting that exposure to crude oil spill is a risk factor for asthma.19

In the present study, we sought to determine the respiratory health effects associated with inhalation of PM generated as a result of controlled burning of spilled crude oil (OSPM). We tested whether acute exposure to OSPM induces oxidative stress and alters pulmonary immunologic responses to allergens. We determined the free radical content of OSPM particles and estimated their ability to induce oxidative stress in vitro. Additionally, we tested whether acute exposure to OSPM exacerbates pulmonary innate and adaptive immune responses in a mouse model of allergic asthma. Results from our studies demonstrated that exposure to OSPM results in systemic oxidative stress, pulmonary inflammation, and altered innate and adaptive pulmonary immune responses. Combining OSPM exposure with allergen challenge resulted in increased peribronchiolar inflammation and airway mucus production. This was accompanied by significant increase in Th2 responses, a hallmark of asthma. Taken together, these studies identify the respiratory health effects of acute exposure to OSPM in mouse models and suggests that exposure to OSPM may induce adverse respiratory health effects among cleanup participants, especially those with preexisting allergic asthma.


Oil Sail Particulate Matter (OSPM)

The sample of OSPM was collected from black, particle-laden smoke plumes from incomplete combustion of crude oil. OSPM particles were collected by maneuvering an aerostat-lofted sampler into the in situ burn plumes of the DWH oil spill from a ship-mounted winch as described by Aurell et al.20 PM filters were collected from a total of 27 oil burn plumes and the average concentration of PM content as measured by carbon balance method from a total of five composite over a period of 4 days was found to be 0.088 kg/kg carbon burned. PM contributed to 10% of total carbon emitted by mass and over 80% of the PM mass was elemental carbon.21

Cytotoxicity Assessment

OSPM particles were tested for cytotoxic effect using Alamar blue reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). A detailed method is described in the Supporting Information.

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Superoxide Radicals Assay

OSPM particles were tested for generation of ROS and superoxide radicals using BEAS-2B cells following manufacturer’s instructions. A detailed method is described in the Supporting Information.

Animals and Treatment

Female BALB/c mice (aged 6–8 weeks) were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis IN). All animals were housed in ventilated cages and supplied with filtered air in a specific pathogen free environment. Mice had free access to food and water under controlled conditions with 12 h light/dark cycle, temperature, and humidity. All animal protocols were prepared in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the LSU and UTHSC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. OSPM particles were suspended at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in irrigation saline (Vehicle) containing 0.02% Tween-80 and were subsequently subjected to probe sonication to disperse the particles from forming aggregates. Each mouse received 50 µg OSPM on protocol days 1, 3, and 5 via oropharyngeal aspiration (OA) as described previously.12 In our studies, this has proven to be equivalent to an inhalation exposure of 230 µg/m3 for 30 min.14 We chose OA as the OSPM delivery method over inhalation route for administration of the particles due to limited availability of OSPM samples and to ensure accuracy of dosing. Vehicle and OVA group mice were exposed to the same volume of vehicle.

Serum 8-Isoprostane

Blood was collected 48 h after the last exposure of OSPM and was allowed to clot for 30 min. Serum was isolated by centrifugation and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Serum samples were saponified and subjected to solid phase extraction by using established methods as described earlier,22 and the level of 8-IP, a marker of oxidative stress, was quantified by ELISA (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Cellularity

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed by flushing lungs with 1 mL of PBS containing 0.5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). An aliquot of 200 µL of isolated BAL fluid was used to count the total number of cells. A volume of BAL fluid equivalent to 20,000 cells was centrifuged onto glass slides using cytospin. Subsequently, the slides were allowed to air-dry and stained using a Hema-3 staining kit (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Differential counts of cells were determined by an unbiased observer from a total of 20,000 cells per slide based on the morphology and the staining of the cells.

Mouse Model of Allergic Asthma

Mouse model of asthma was established by sensitizing and challenging the mice with chicken egg white ovalbumin (OVA). Briefly, mice were divided into Vehicle, OSPM, OVA, and OVA+OSPM groups (n = 5–6 per group). The OVA and OVA+OSPM group mice were sensitized with a mixture of 20 µg of OVA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) emulsified in Imject Alum (Pierce, Rockford, IL) via i.p. on protocol days 0 and 7. Subsequently, mice were challenged with a solution of 1% OVA in saline on protocol days 15, 16, and 17 and rechallenged on days 30, 31, and 32 by inhalation exposure for 20 min. OVA+OSPM group mice were exposed to 50 µg of OSPM via OA route on protocol days 14, 16, and 18 (Figure 4A).

Figure 4
OSPM enhances pulmonary inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. (A) Schematic of exposure protocol to OSPM and induction of mouse model of asthma. (B) Total cell numbers in BAL fluid and differential counts for macrophages (Mac), lymphocytes (Lym), neutrophils ...

Assessment of Pulmonary T Cell Populations

Mice were euthanized, and blood was gently flushed from the lungs to remove excess red blood cells by retrograde vascular perfusion with isotonic saline. A single-cell suspension of lung cells was prepared using collagenase digestion and physical manipulation as described earlier.23,24 Briefly, perfused lungs were excised, cut into small pieces, and collected in chilled Hank’s Balanced Salt solution (HBSS) containing 1 mg/mL collagenase and 150 ng/mL DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and mechanically dissociated using Octodissociator (Miltenyi, Germany). Dissociated lungs were incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm for 30 min. Following incubation, lungs were dissociated a second time in the octodissociator, and single cell suspension was obtained by filtering the cell suspension through a 40 µm cell strainer. The resulting cell suspension was treated with RBC lysis buffer to remove residual RBCs. A total of 1.2 million cells from each sample were stimulated with 5 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and 500 ng/mL ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of a protein transport inhibitor (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences). Cells were subsequently fixed, permeabilized, and stained with eFluor450-CD3, PerCP-CD4, FITC-CD8, PE-IFN-γ and PE-Cy7-IL-4, APC-IL-17A, Fixable live/dead dye eFluor 780 (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA) was used to stain dead cells. After the staining procedure, cells were immediately analyzed by FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Dead cells were excluded from analysis. Flowcytometry data was analyzed using FlowJo software v.7.6.5 (Tree Star, OR).

Lung Histology

Our methods used for lung histopathology are described in the Supporting Information.

Statistical Analysis

All results were expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software Inc., Version 6.03, CA). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test, one way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, unpaired t test, and multiple t tests with Holm-Sidak correction were used to determine statistical difference between groups. p values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically different.


Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectra of OSPM Particles

OSPM particles were analyzed for the presence of free radicals using EPR spectroscopy. A signal for the presence of paramagnetic center in the particles was observed with a ΔHp-p of 5.669 G (Figure S1). The g value for the OSPM particles was found to be ~2.0034. The g value indicated that OSPM predominantly consisted of phenoxyl type radicals. The radical concentration for the OSPM sample was 4.25 × 1016 radicals/g.

OSPM Caused Cytotoxic Effect in BEAS-2B Cells

The cytotoxic effect of OSPM particles was determined using BEAS-2B cells over a range of concentrations (0.97 to 31.24 µg/cm2). The percentage viability of BEAS-2B cells decreased in a timeand dose-dependent manner after treatment with OSPM particles (Figure 1). The lowest concentration at which cytotoxicity was observed was 7.81 µg/cm2.

Figure 1
Dose and time dependent decrease in percent viability of BEAS-2B cells following exposure to OSPM. BEAS-2B cells were exposed to OSPM particles (7.81, 15.62, and 31.24 µg/cm2), and cell viability was assessed 30 and 60 min post-exposure. Data ...

OSPM Induces Generation of ROS and Superoxide Radical Species

PM containing free radicals is known to generate reactive oxygen species in vitro25 and in vivo.13,23 OSPM particles caused a significant dose-dependent increase in ROS at 20, 50, and 100 µg/cm2 (Figure 2A). Significant generation of superoxide radicals was observed at 50 and 100 µg/cm2 in BEAS-2B cells compared to untreated control (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
OSPM generates ROS (A) and superoxide free radicals (B) in vitro. Cells were treated with either vehicle (medium) or OSPM at concentrations 10, 20, 50, and 100 µg/cm2 for 1 h prior to the addition of ROS and superoxide radical detection reagent. ...

Effect of OSPM Exposure in Vivo

Exposure to PM is known to cause morbidity in the form of decrease in body weight gain.23 Exposure to OSPM caused a significant decrease in body weight gain at 48 h after last exposure (Figure 3B). In addition, exposure to radical containing PM has been shown to induce systemic oxidative stress.13,24 To study whether exposure to OSPM induced systemic oxidative stress in mice, we studied indicators of oxidative stress such as 8-IP in the serum. Serum 8-IP levels were significantly increased at 48 h after the last OSPM exposure in mice compared to vehicle control (Vehicle: 106.9 ± 13.51 vs OSPM: 207.2 ± 38.93) (Figure 3C).

Figure 3
OSPM decreases body weight gain and induces oxidative stress in vivo. (A) Schematic of exposure protocol. (B) Body weight gain analysis at 7 days post-exposure. (C) Exposure to OSPM induces systemic oxidative stress. 8-IP levels were measured in the serum ...

Effect of OSPM Exposure on Pulmonary Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in a Mice Model of Asthma

To study whether exposure to OSPM exacerbated pulmonary inflammation, we quantified total and differential cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). We found a significant increase in the total number of cells in OSPM mice compared to vehicle control, which appeared to be due to significant increases in total number of macrophages and eosinophils (Figure 4B). Asthma is characterized by a Th2 biased immune response.26 To understand whether exposure to OSPM has any effect on altering the asthma response, we studied the effect of OSPM on pulmonary T cell responses in a mice model of asthma at 48 h after the final exposure to OVA. A significant increase in adaptive T cell responses (Th1, Th2, and Th17) was observed in mice in the OVA and OVA+OSPM groups. However, exposure to OSPM caused a significant increase in the percentage of Th2 cells (OVA: 1.58 ± 0.24 vs OVA+OSPM: 2.57 ± 0.08) and a decreased percentage of Th1 cells (OVA: 4.68 ± 0.24 vs OVA+OSPM: 3.72 ± 0.05) (Figure 4C and S4) in OVA+OSPM exposed mice compared to OVA exposed mice. Although the data reproducibly suggested a decrease in Th17 responses in the OVA+OSPM mice, we were unable to demonstrate a statistical difference between these mice and OVA mice. Total IgE concentrations in the lungs of both OVA and OVA+OSPM groups were comparable. The concentration of IgE was significantly elevated in OVA+OSPM group compared to vehicle or OSPM exposed mice. Though the concentration of IgE was increased in OVA group mice, it is not statistically significant compared to the OSPM group (Figure S5).

OSPM Exacerbates Pulmonary Inflammation and Mucus Production in a Mouse Model of Asthma

To study whether exposure to OSPM caused any alteration in pulmonary inflammation and mucus production caused by OVA challenge, we studied pulmonary inflammation after exposure to OSPM in a mouse model of asthma. Lung histopathology showed a significant increase in inflammatory cell infiltration in the peribronchiolar region characterized by the presence of increased numbers of eosinophils (Figure 5A). Also, PAS staining demonstrated a significant increase in mucus production in the pulmonary bronchioles of OVA+OSPM mice as characterized by an increased percentage of PAS+ cells in OVA+OSPM mice compared to OVA mice (Figure 5B, 5C). Alveolar macrophages with engulfed OSPM were observed adjacent to the airways in both OSPM and OVA+OSPM group mice even at 20 days after exposure suggesting a delayed pulmonary clearance of these particles. Figure 5D shows a PAS stained photomicrograph of lung section containing macrophages laden with engulfed OSPM.

Figure 5
OSPM enhances pulmonary inflammation and airway mucus production in a mouse model of asthma. (A) Representative photomicrographs of histological sections of mice lungs stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Black arrow heads point to peribronchiolar inflammation. ...


The association between exposures to elevated levels of PM from combustion processes and adverse respiratory health effects resulting in enhanced morbidity and mortality rates has been well documented,2729 although the mechanisms responsible are not fully understood. Crude oil smoke is a mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and PM. Though the volatile constituents of crude oil are known to cause respiratory symptoms, the PM generated from burning crude oil may also elicit adverse respiratory events. The air quality monitoring data acquired by the EPA during the in situ burns demonstrated that in certain places PM10 levels reached as high as 944 µg/m3 and the PM2.5 levels were as high as 213 µg/m3.30 The EPA’s health based National Ambient Air Quality (NAAQ) average annual and daily level standards for PM2.5 are 12 µg/m3 and 35 µg/m3, respectively, and the daily standard for PM10 is 150 µg/m3.31

The typical in situ burn operation of crude oil involves containment of the oil to achieve burnable thickness and is then ignited by means of a Heli-torch ignition system containing gelled gasoline.32 The smoke emitting from the crude oil combustion is a mixture of several gases and particulate matter. In addition, small amounts of toxic gases and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are emitted from the burn.33 Experimental results from Newfoundland off shore in situ burn studies showed that the concentration of particulates exceeded more than 150 µg/m3 at several places 10 miles down wind of the burn.33 In situ burning of surface oil reduces coastal and marine environmental threat by rapid removal of surface oil. However, the largest disadvantage is the emissions from incomplete combustion of the oil and release of large volumes of combustion derived particulate matter, thus posing potential exposure conditions to the personnel involved in the cleanup activities and people in the vicinity. Though in situ burning of DWH crude oil on the surface of the seawater is different from oil well fires, it is expected that smoke from both the fires will both produce vaporization of VOCs - the primary risk is chemicals associated with the soot generated in the fire. Indeed, the soot was shown to contain incomplete combustion products including transition metals, salts, and organics and generate compounds like polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCDFs)20 and, as shown here, PM containing environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs), which are individually and collectively of potential health concern. In general, the median particulate size in the smoke of oil burns was estimated to be 0.5 µm.34 Response personnel on the boats pulling the booms or on the igniter boats were not wearing respiratory protective devices; thus, exposure to OSPM represented a definite hazard to the respiratory system. Though studies showed that the concentration of PM10 near burn sites would be below the permissive levels (8 h mean for PM10 is 5 mg/m3),34 the high permissive level does not preclude the fact that high levels were observed or that respiratory effects may still may be observed at lower levels (especially in susceptible populations).34 There is little data concerning the effect of smoke from crude oil in situ burns on humans. Some of the previous epidemiological studies on Gulf war veterans exposed to oil well fires demonstrate an association between exposure to PM from crude oil well smoke and asthma35 and a higher prevalence of reduced forced vital capacity.36 Since PM from crude oil smoke is a complex mixture, it is difficult to attribute the observed respiratory health effects to specific constituents. However, PM is a major constituent of the smoke, and since PM is known to affect respiratory health, here we tested the effect of acute exposure to inhaled in situ burned oil PM (OSPM). The PM was collected from the smoke plumes during the cleanup of the oil on the Gulf surface resulting from the DWH.

Though epidemiological evidence of association between exposure to combustion derived PM and respiratory health effects exist, very few studies have actually addressed the mechanism responsible for such effects, and fewer studies have evaluated their effect in the exacerbation of asthma using animal models. A recent study has demonstrated that PM from residual oil fly ash exacerbates allergic airway inflammation using mice models.17 Our primary objective in this study was to understand the possible respiratory health consequences of acute exposure to OSPM from DWH oil spill using in vitro and in vivo approaches. As expected, we observed the presence of EPFRs in OSPM and the EPR spectral signature indicated that they are predominantly phenoxyl type of radicals (Figure S1). Previously, phenoxyl-type radicals generated as a result of combustion processes were shown to be stabilized and resistant to oxidation and persist in the environment for long periods of time.37,38 Further, these EPFRs have the ability to produce ROS in biological systems due to their redox potential.39 Our studies demonstrated that, in vitro, OSPM induced both reactive oxygen species and superoxide free radicals indicative of their ability to induce oxidative stress. Further, OSPM caused cytopathic effects on human bronchial epithelial cells in a dose dependent manner (Figure 1). Oxidative stress is known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma40 and augmentation of allergen induced lung inflammation.41 Moreover, exposure to ultrafine carbon particles is shown to exert an adjuvant effect on allergen induced airway inflammation.42,43 8-IP, a stable byproduct of lipid peroxidation, is a known indicator of oxidative stress, and airborne PM has been shown to induce oxidative stress leading to lipid peroxidation and increased serum levels of 8-IP.44 A significant increase in serum 8-IP levels was observed in mice exposed to OSPM at 48 h post-exposure, indicating a systemic oxidative stress response.

Despite our knowledge that particulate pollutants can interact with both innate and adaptive immune responses and exacerbate allergic airway disease, the mechanisms involved are not fully understood.45 Using a mice model of allergic asthma, we further examined the role of these particles in altering pulmonary immunologic homeostasis and driving allergic airway inflammation and lung dysfunction. Asthma is typically characterized by an imbalance between Th1 and Th2 immune response,46 and oxidative stress has been shown to play a role in favoring differentiation and polarization of CD4+ lymphocytes toward Th2 phenotype.47 Also, our previous studies showed oxidative stress as a result of exposure to combustion derived PM was associated with increased maturation of dendritic cells and Th17 immune response. Our data demonstrated that prior exposure to OSPM enhanced adaptive, pulmonary T cell responses, specifically increasing the Th2 cells and decreasing Th1 cells in mice exposed to OSPM and challenged with allergen (OVA) compared to mice that were challenged with just OVA, thus leading to a Th2 biased immune response. However, no difference in Th17 responses was observed. These observations are consistent with other studies using DEP, where oxidative stress was found to favor a Th2 skewed immune response while suppressing the Th1 response.4850 Consistent with these observations, OVA challenged mice exposed to OSPM exhibited significantly greater peribronchiolar inflammation compared to OVA exposed mice. Since inflammation was present in the BALF at 5 days after exposure to OSPM, it is possible that it resolved prior to T cell phenotype and histological analysis. Further, the presence of OSPM particles and the resulting oxidative stress due to OSPM exposure during OVA challenge might have favored the Th2 response observed. The increase in the airway mucus production in OVA+OSPM compared to OVA group mice is consistent with a Th2 biased response. Thus, our results indicate that OSPM synergizes with OVA and exacerbates OVA induced pulmonary pathophysiology.

In conclusion, our data suggests that exposure to OSPM causes systemic and local oxidative stress and pulmonary inflammation in the form of increased numbers of macrophages and eosinophils in the lungs of mice exposed to OSPM. Also, in a mouse model of asthma, OSPM exacerbated allergic asthma response by significantly increasing the Th2 biased immune response to OVA as evidenced by increased peribronchiolar inflammation and airway mucus production in the lungs. These responses may be attributed partially to oxidative stress induced by these particles. It is unclear if the respiratory health of cleanup participants was affected; however, our results provide valuable information to understand the possible health effects observed as a result of acute exposure to OSPM, especially in those with preexisting pulmonary conditions.


Due to limited sample, our study had limitations including the fact that we performed only acute exposures at one dose mimicking high PM2.5 levels recorded by the EPA and our route of exposure bypassed the nasal passages. We are also aware that potential human health risks would be best determined by determining the amount of actual inhaled OSPM, the duration of exposure, and repeating these studies with those parameters in mind. Moreover, further studies are required to understand the long-term respiratory health effects of exposure to OSPM.

Supplementary Material

Supporting data


This research was supported by NIEHS grants to S.A.C. (R01ES015050 and P42ES013648) and NIAID grant to S.A.C. (R01AI090059). This publication solely reflects the personal views of the authors and does not suggest or reflect the views of NIH/NIEHS.



Supporting Information

Methods for cytotoxicity assessment, ROS and superoxide radical assay, lung histology, and total IgE estimation in the lung homogenates. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01439.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.


1. On scene coordinator report, Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard; 2011. [accessed July 1, 2015].
2. BP Deepwater Horizon spill: Scientists say seafood safe, but health effects being measured. [accessed July 1, 2015];
3. Assessing the Effects of the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill on Human Health: A Summary of the June 2010 Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press; 2010. [accessed July 1, 2015]. [PubMed]
4. Zock JP, Rodriguez-Trigo G, Pozo-Rodriguez F, Barbera JA, Bouso L, Torralba Y, Anto JM, Gomez FP, Fuster C, Verea H, Group SE-PS. Prolonged respiratory symptoms in cleanup workers of the prestige oil spill. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;176(6):610–616. [PubMed]
5. Goldstein BD, Osofsky HJ, Lichtveld MY. The Gulf oil spill. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364(14):1334–1348. [PubMed]
6. Pandya RJ, Solomon G, Kinner A, Balmes JR. Diesel exhaust and asthma: hypotheses and molecular mechanisms of action. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 1):103–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Brandt EB, Kovacic MB, Lee GB, Gibson AM, Acciani TH, Le Cras TD, Ryan PH, Budelsky AL, Khurana Hershey GK. Diesel exhaust particle induction of IL-17A contributes to severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013;132(5):1194–1204. e2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Balmes JR. How does diesel exhaust impact asthma? Thorax. 2011;66(1):4–6. [PubMed]
9. Dockery DW. Health effects of particulate air pollution. Ann. Epidemiol. 2009;19(4):257–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Ruckerl R, Schneider A, Breitner S, Cyrys J, Peters A. Health effects of particulate air pollution: A review of epidemiological evidence. Inhalation Toxicol. 2011;23(10):555–592. [PubMed]
11. Downs SH, Schindler C, Liu LJ, Keidel D, Bayer-Oglesby L, Brutsche MH, Gerbase MW, Keller R, Kunzli N, Leuenberger P, Probst-Hensch NM, Tschopp JM, Zellweger JP, Rochat T, Schwartz J, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Team S. Reduced exposure to PM10 and attenuated age-related decline in lung function. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357(23):2338–2347. [PubMed]
12. Wang P, Thevenot P, Saravia J, Ahlert T, Cormier SA. Radical-containing particles activate dendritic cells and enhance Th17 inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011;45(5):977–983. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Balakrishna S, Saravia J, Thevenot P, Ahlert T, Lominiki S, Dellinger B, Cormier SA. Environmentally persistent free radicals induce airway hyperresponsiveness in neonatal rat lungs. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2011;8:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Saravia J, You D, Thevenot P, Lee GI, Shrestha B, Lomnicki S, Cormier SA. Early-life exposure to combustion-derived particulate matter causes pulmonary immunosuppression. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(3):694–704. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Li N, Hao M, Phalen RF, Hinds WC, Nel AE. Particulate air pollutants and asthma. A paradigm for the role of oxidative stress in PM-induced adverse health effects. Clin. Immunol. 2003;109(3):250–265. [PubMed]
16. Dockery DW, Pope CA., 3rd Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 1994;15:107–132. [PubMed]
17. Arantes-Costa FM, Grund LZ, Martins MA, Lima C. Airborne pollutant ROFA enhances the allergic airway inflammation through direct modulation of dendritic cells in an uptake-dependent mechanism. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014;22(1):9–20. [PubMed]
18. Janjua NZ, Kasi PM, Nawaz H, Farooqui SZ, Khuwaja UB, Najamul H, Jafri SN, Lutfi SA, Kadir MM, Sathiakumar N. Acute health effects of the Tasman Spirit oil spill on residents of Karachi, Pakistan. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Jung SC, Kim KM, Lee KS, Roh S, Jeong WC, Kwak SJ, Lee IJ, Choi YH, Noh SR, Hur JI, Jee YK. Respiratory effects of the hebei spirit oil spill on children in taean, Korea. Allergy, Asthma Immunol. Res. 2013;5(6):365–370. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Aurell J, Gullett BK. Aerostat sampling of PCDD/PCDF emissions from the Gulf oil spill in situ burns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44(24):9431–9437. [PubMed]
21. Ross JL, Ferek RJ, Hobbs PV. Particle and Gas Emissions from an In Situ Burn of Crude Oil on the Ocean. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1996;46(3):251–259.
22. Lord K, Moll D, Lindsey JK, Mahne S, Raman G, Dugas T, Cormier S, Troxlair D, Lomnicki S, Dellinger B, Varner K. Environmentally persistent free radicals decrease cardiac function before and after ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo. J. Recept. Signal Transduction Res. 2011;31(2):157–167. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Lee GI, Saravia J, You D, Shrestha B, Jaligama S, Hebert VY, Dugas TR, Cormier SA. Exposure to combustion generated environmentally persistent free radicals enhances severity of influenza virus infection. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:57. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Wang P, You D, Saravia J, Shen H, Cormier SA. Maternal exposure to combustion generated PM inhibits pulmonary Th1 maturation and concomitantly enhances postnatal asthma development in offspring. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013;10:29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Fahmy B, Ding L, You D, Lomnicki S, Dellinger B, Cormier SA. In vitro and in vivo assessment of pulmonary risk associated with exposure to combustion generated fine particles. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010;29(2):173–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Bosnjak B, Stelzmueller B, Erb KJ, Epstein MM. Treatment of allergic asthma: modulation of Th2 cells and their responses. Respir Res. 2011;12:114. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Dockery DW, Brunekreef B. Longitudinal studies of air pollution effects on lung function. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996;154(6 Pt 2):S250–S256. [PubMed]
28. Ko FW, Hui DS. Air pollution and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2012;17(3):395–401. [PubMed]
29. Gehring U, Gruzieva O, Agius RM, Beelen R, Custovic A, Cyrys J, Eeftens M, Flexeder C, Fuertes E, Heinrich J, Hoffmann B, de Jongste JC, Kerkhof M, Klumper C, Korek M, Molter A, Schultz ES, Simpson A, Sugiri D, Svartengren M, von Berg A, Wijga AH, Pershagen G, Brunekreef B. Air pollution exposure and lung function in children: the ESCAPE project. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013;121(11–12):1357–1364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Air Data from the Gulf Coastline. [accessed July 1, 2015];
31. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. Environmental Protection Agency; 2013. [accessed July 1, 2015].
32. Oil Spill Response Offshore, In-situ Burn Operations Manual. Groto, CT: U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center; 2003. [accessed July 1, 2015].
33. Barnea N. Health and Safety Aspects of In-situ Burning of Oil. Seattle, WA 98115, USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; [accessed July 1, 2015].
34. Guidance for developing a site safety plan for developing marine in situ burn operations. National Response Team Science and Technology Committee; 1997. [accessed July 1, 2015].$File/SAFETY%20PLAN%2097.pdf?OpenElement.
35. Cowan DN, Lange JL, Heller J, Kirkpatrick J, DeBakey S. A case-control study of asthma among U.S. Army Gulf War veterans and modeled exposure to oil well fire smoke. Mil. Med. 2002;167(9):777–782. [PubMed]
36. Kelsall HL, Sim MR, Forbes AB, McKenzie DP, Glass DC, Ikin JF, Ittak P, Abramson MJ. Respiratory health status of Australian veterans of the 1991 Gulf War and the effects of exposure to oil fire smoke and dust storms. Thorax. 2004;59(10):897–903. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Truong H, Lomnicki S, Dellinger B. Mechanisms of molecular product and persistent radical formation from the pyrolysis of hydroquinone. Chemosphere. 2008;71(1):107–113. [PubMed]
38. Dellinger B, Lomnicki S, Khachatryan L, Maskos Z, Hall RW, Adounkpe J, McFerrin C, Truong H. Formation and stabilization of persistent free radicals. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007;31(1):521–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Lomnicki S, Truong H, Vejerano E, Dellinger B. Copper oxide-based model of persistent free radical formation on combustion-derived particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42(13):4982–4988. [PubMed]
40. Montuschi P, Corradi M, Ciabattoni G, Nightingale J, Kharitonov SA, Barnes PJ. Increased 8-isoprostane, a marker of oxidative stress, in exhaled condensate of asthma patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999;160(1):216–220. [PubMed]
41. Alessandrini F, Beck-Speier I, Krappmann D, Weichenmeier I, Takenaka S, Karg E, Kloo B, Schulz H, Jakob T, Mempel M, Behrendt H. Role of oxidative stress in ultrafine particle-induced exacerbation of allergic lung inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;179(11):984–991. [PubMed]
42. Alessandrini F, Schulz H, Takenaka S, Lentner B, Karg E, Behrendt H, Jakob T. Effects of ultrafine carbon particle inhalation on allergic inflammation of the lung. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006;117(4):824–830. [PubMed]
43. Løvik M, Høgseth AK, Gaarder PI, Hagemann R, Eide I. Diesel exhaust particles and carbon black have adjuvant activity on the local lymph node response and systemic IgE production to ovalbumin. Toxicology. 1997;121(2):165–178. [PubMed]
44. Rosa MJ, Yan B, Chillrud SN, Acosta LM, Divjan A, Jacobson JS, Miller RL, Goldstein IF, Perzanowski MS. Domestic airborne black carbon levels and 8-isoprostane in exhaled breath condensate among children in New York City. Environ. Res. 2014;135:105–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. Air pollution and allergy: you are what you breathe. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6(3):223–226. [PubMed]
46. Barnes PJ. Th2 cytokines and asthma: an introduction. Respir Res. 2001;2(2):64–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. King MR, Ismail AS, Davis LS, Karp DR. Oxidative stress promotes polarization of human T cell differentiation toward a T helper 2 phenotype. J. Immunol. 2006;176(5):2765–2772. [PubMed]
48. Ohtani T, Nakagawa S, Kurosawa M, Mizuashi M, Ozawa M, Aiba S. Cellular basis of the role of diesel exhaust particles in inducing Th2-dominant response. J. Immunol. 2005;174(4):2412–2419. [PubMed]
49. van Zijverden M, van der Pijl A, Bol M, van Pinxteren FA, de Haar C, Penninks AH, van Loveren H, Pieters R. Diesel exhaust, carbon black, and silica particles display distinct Th1/Th2 modulating activity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2000;168(2):131–139. [PubMed]
50. Chan RC, Wang M, Li N, Yanagawa Y, Onoe K, Lee JJ, Nel AE. Pro-oxidative diesel exhaust particle chemicals inhibit LPS-induced dendritic cell responses involved in T-helper differentiation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006;118(2):455–465. [PubMed]