Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosbiolPLoS BiologySubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Biol. Jul 2004; 2(7): e171.
Published online Jul 13, 2004. doi:  10.1371/journal.pbio.0020171
PMCID: PMC449785
A Chromosomal Memory Triggered by Xist Regulates Histone Methylation in X Inactivation
Alexander Kohlmaier,1 Fabio Savarese,1 Monika Lachner,1 Joost Martens,1 Thomas Jenuwein,1 and Anton Wutzcorresponding author1
1Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Anton Wutz: wutz/at/
Received January 15, 2004; Accepted April 9, 2004.
We have elucidated the kinetics of histone methylation during X inactivation using an inducible Xist expression system in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Previous reports showed that the ability of Xist to trigger silencing is restricted to an early window in ES cell differentiation. Here we show that this window is also important for establishing methylation patterns on the potential inactive X chromosome. By immunofluorescence and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments we show that histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27m3) and H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (H4K20m1) are associated with Xist expression in undifferentiated ES cells and mark the initiation of X inactivation. Both marks depend on Xist RNA localisation but are independent of silencing. Induction of Xist expression after the initiation window leads to a markedly reduced ability to induce H3K27m3, whereas expression before the restrictive time point allows efficient H3K27m3 establishment. Our data show that Xist expression early in ES cell differentiation establishes a chromosomal memory, which is maintained in the absence of silencing. One consequence of this memory is the ability to introduce H3K27m3 efficiently after the restrictive time point on the chromosome that has expressed Xist early. Our results suggest that this silencing-independent chromosomal memory has important implications for the maintenance of X inactivation, where previously self-perpetuating heterochromatin structures were viewed as the principal form of memory.
In mammals, dosage differences of X-linked genes between XX female and XY male cells are adjusted by transcriptional inactivation of one of the two female X chromosomes. X inactivation is a multistep process, in which the cell counts the number of X chromosomes, chooses one to be active, and silences all others. Initiation of silencing is triggered by accumulation of the 17-kb noncoding Xist RNA (Borsani et al. 1991; Brockdorff et al. 1991; Brown et al. 1991). Remarkably, Xist RNA attaches to chromatin and spreads from its site of transcription in cis over the entire inactive X chromosome (Xi), mediating transcriptional repression. Xist is essential for initiation of silencing, but not for the maintenance of transcriptional repression on the Xi at later stages of cellular differentiation (Penny et al. 1996; Marahrens et al. 1998; Csankovszki et al. 2001). Presently, the molecular nature of the silencing mechanism is not known. Previous studies have shown that X-chromosome inactivation involves the progressive recruitment of a variety of different factors and posttranslational modifications of lysine residues in the amino termini of histones (reviewed in Brockdorff 2002). The current view is that Xist expression initiates the formation of heterochromatin on the Xi, which can be perpetuated by redundant silencing mechanisms at later stages. Consistent with this view, it has been shown that the Xi in mouse embryonic fibroblasts is kept inactive in the absence of Xist by redundant mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone H4 hypoacetylation (Csankovszki et al. 2001).
The Polycomb group proteins Ezh2 and Eed localise to the Xi in embryonic and extraembryonic tissues early in mouse development (Wang et al. 2001; Mak et al. 2002; Plath et al. 2003; Silva et al. 2003). The human EZH2/EED and its homologous E(z)/ESC complex in Drosophila melanogaster show intrinsic histone H3 lysine 9 (H3-K9) and lysine 27 (H3-K27) methyltransferase activity (Cao et al. 2002; Czermin et al. 2002; Kuzmichev et al. 2002; Muller et al. 2002). Interestingly, H3-K27 methylation is one of the earliest chromosomal modifications on the Xi (Plath et al. 2003), and the requirement of Eed for histone methylation on the Xi has been demonstrated (Silva et al. 2003). However, analysis of Eed mutant embryos suggests that Eed is not required for initiation of silencing in trophoblast cells but is required for the maintenance of the Xi at later stages (Wang et al. 2001). Although data are consistent with the interpretation that Xist RNA recruits the Ezh2/Eed complex, thereby introducing histone H3 methylation, the significance of H3-K27 methylation for chromosomal inactivation is unclear. In flies, methylation on H3-K27 facilitates the binding of Polycomb to amino-terminal fragments of histone H3 (Cao et al. 2002; Min et al. 2003). Polycomb recruitment to the Xi has not been observed, and current models suggest that H3-K27 methylation in X-chromosome inactivation is indepen-dent of classical Polycomb silencing (Mak et al. 2002; Silva et al. 2003).
We have previously shown that chromosomal silencing can be recapitulated in embryonic stem (ES) cells by expressing Xist RNA from cDNA transgenes integrated into autosomes and the X chromosome (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000), and this allowed for an uncoupling of Xist regulation from cellular differentiation. In this transgenic system, Xist expression is under the control of a tetracycline-responsive promoter, which can be induced by the addition of doxycycline to the culture medium. We showed that Xist RNA localisation and silencing can be separated by introducing specific mutations in Xist RNA (Wutz et al. 2002). Initiation of silencing depends on the repeat A sequence at the 5′ end of Xist. Deletion of this element results in an RNA that localises to chromatin and spreads over the chromosome, but does not trigger transcriptional repression. Initial silencing in ES cells is reversible and dependent on Xist expression. At a later stage in differentiation this silent state becomes irreversible and independent of Xist, corresponding to the maintenance phase of X inactivation. We also showed that Xist expression must be induced early in ES cell differentiation to cause transcriptional repression (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). Therefore, establishment of silencing is restricted to an initiation window in ES cell differentiation, and induction of Xist expression at a time point later than 24 h in differentiation no longer causes silencing. We found that Xist RNA loses its potential to initiate transcriptional repression roughly 24 h earlier in differentiation than the point at which silencing becomes irreversible. Notably, this left a gap of approximately one cell cycle in length between the initiation and maintenance phases. How silencing is maintained during this period and how the silent state becomes irreversible remained previously unexplained. In this report we perform kinetic measurements and quantification of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27m3), revealing a novel chromosomal memory that is established by Xist expression at an early time point in ES cell differentiation independent of transcriptional repression. Our analysis suggests that this chromosomal memory might have an important role in the transition from the initiation phase to the maintenance phase of X inactivation.
Profiling Histone Modification States at the Initiation of X Inactivation
We have previously reported that the initial steps of chromosomal silencing in mammalian X inactivation can be recapitulated in transgenic undifferentiated male ES cells (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). Such ES cells are useful for studying the function of Xist RNA in the initiation of chromosomal silencing and for analysing the kinetics and relevance of chromosomal modifications. We aimed to delineate a pattern of histone methylation states that define the initial decision for facultative heterochromatin. To achieve this we performed immunofluorescence staining against the various modification states on histone H3 and H4 lysine residues in clone 36 ES cells, in which Xist expression can be induced from a transgene integrated on Chromosome 11 by addition of doxycycline to the culture medium (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). We used highly specific antisera for a defined methylation state (mono-, di-, or tri-) at a particular lysine residue in the amino terminus of histone H3 and H4 (Peters et al. 2003; Perez-Burgos et al. 2004). Some cross reactivity of the H3K27m2 antiserum with H3K27m1 and H3K27m3, of the H3K4m3 antiserum with H3K4m2, and of the H4K20m2 antiserum with H4K20m1 and H4K20m3 was detected on peptide blots (Figure S1), but does not affect the conclusions drawn in this study. Our cytological experiments show a focal signal for H3K27m3 in the interphase nuclei of clone 36 ES cells upon Xist expression, which colocalises with Chromosome 11 in metaphase spreads and Xist RNA in interphase nuclei (Figure 1). In cells grown in the absence of doxycycline, a diffuse nuclear signal was observed. H3-K27 mono- and dimethylation were equally present on the inactivated chromosome and other autosomes (Table 1). Notably, we did not observe any specific enrichment for the H3K9m1, H3K9m2, or H3K9m3 signal on Chromosome 11 upon Xist induction (Figures (Figures1C,1C, C,1G,1G, and S2). H3K9m3 and H3K27m1 colocalised strictly with constitutive heterochromatin at pericentric regions and the Y chromosome (Figure 1G and and1H).1H). H3K4m2 and H3K4m3 gave banded signals on chromosome arms that were reduced but not entirely erased on the transgenic chromosome, when Xist expression was induced (Figures (Figures1E1E and S2J). The heterochromatic Y chromosome completely lacked both H3K4m2 and H3K4m3 in the same metaphase spread. Thus, we conclude that the reduction of H3K4m2 and H3K4m2 on the Xist-expressing chromosome is consistent with a state of transcriptional repression (Santos-Rosa et al. 2002) and with earlier reports that implicate H3-K4 hypomethylation early in X inactivation (Heard et al. 2001; O'Neill et al. 2003). H3K4m1 was equally present on the Xist-expressing chromosome and other autosomes. Using antisera specific for methylation states of H4K20, we observed that H4K20m1 decorated Chromosome 11 upon Xist induction in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells (in 46% of interphase nuclei; Figure 1B). H4K20m2 and H4K20m3 were not enriched on the Xist-expressing chromosome (Figure S2H and S2I; G. Schotta and M. Lachner, unpublished data). We also investigated the acetylation state of histone H4 in these cells using a sheep polyclonal antiserum that preferentially recognises multiply acetylated H4 (Morrison and Jeppesen 2002). Using this antiserum, we detected partial hypoacetylation of Chromosome 11 in metaphase spreads of clone 36 ES cells that were induced to express Xist (Figures (Figures1F,1F, S2K, and S2L). This observation is different from the global chromosome-wide hypoacetylation of H4 that was reported on the Xi later in differentiation (Keohane et al. 1996) and might reflect the absence of active promoters. We also detected a degree of hypoacetylation when a silencing-defective Xist RNA was expressed (Figure S3), making it likely to be the consequence of cross talk with H4-K20 methylation, which is mutually exclusive at least with H4-K16 acetylation (Nishioka et al. 2002). In conclusion, H3K27m3, H4K20m1, reduction of H3K4m2 and H3K4m3, and reduced multiple-lysine acetylation of histone H4 correlate with the inactive state of the chromosome in undifferentiated ES cells (Table 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Epigenetic Imprints at the Initiation of X Inactivation
Table 1
Table 1
Histone Lysine Methylation States as Epigenetic Imprints during X Inactivation
Further confirmation of the cytological findings comes from chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments using antibodies specific for H3K27m3, H4K20m1, H3K4m3, H3K4m2, and H3K9m2 in both undifferentiated and differentiated clone 36 ES cells in the presence or absence of doxycycline (Figure 2). We observed enhanced H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 in the cells expressing Xist regardless of the differentiation state on three microsatellite sequences on Chromosome 11 (Figure 2). A control microsatellite on Chromosome 15 did not show this effect (Figure 2F and and2L).2L). Upon Xist expression, we also observed H3K27m3 on the puromycin marker gene cointegrated with the Xist transgene on Chromosome 11, compared to nearly undetectable levels in the uninduced sample (Figure 2B). This increase in H3K27m3 was paralleled by a marked decrease in H3K4m2 and H3K4m3, but no increase in H4K20m1 could be observed at this locus in undifferentiated ES cells. Upon differentiation, an increase in the H4K20m1 signal was observed when Xist was expressed on all sequences on Chromosome 11. A control tubulin gene located on Chromosome 15 showed no significant change upon Xist induction (Figure 2E and and2K).2K). These data show that H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 are elevated by Xist RNA expression on the transgenic chromosome, in agreement with our cytological analysis. However, regional differences are revealed by the higher resolution of the ChIP experiment, showing that the two modifications do not display a completely overlapping distribution on the chromosome. Differentiation of the ES cells resulted in increased H4K20m1 signals dependent on Xist expression. H3K9m2 was also elevated on two loci on Chromosome 11.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ChIP Mapping of H3K27m3, H4K20m1, H3K9m2, H3K4m3, and H3K4m2 on the Xist-Expressing Chromosome 11 during Differentiation of Clone 36 ES Cells
H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 Are Triggered by Xist RNA Localisation and Are Independent of Silencing
In agreement with earlier studies (Plath et al. 2003; Silva et al. 2003), our results indicate that chromosome-wide histone H3K27m3 is efficiently triggered in undifferentiated ES cells and therefore is an early mark of X inactivation. We measured the kinetics of H3K27m3 following induction of Xist RNA expression in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells (Figure S3A). At 6, 12, and 24 h after induction 0%, 12%, and 37% of the cells, respectively, showed a signal, and by 48 h a maximum of 70% was reached. Furthermore, the recruitment of Ezh2 protein to the transgenic Chromosome 11 upon Xist expression (see Figure 1D and and1K)1K) is consistent with the idea that the Ezh2/Eed complex contains the enzymatic activity causing H3K27m3 in X inactivation (Mak et al. 2002; Plath et al. 2003; Silva et al. 2003).
To identify the Xist sequences that are required for the binding of the Ezh2/Eed complex and to trigger H3K27m3, we examined a panel of Xist RNA mutations (Figure 3A). In an earlier study we inserted Xist cDNA transgenes containing defined deletions into the Hprt gene locus on the single X chromosome in male mouse T20 ES cells and measured their ability to cause silencing (Wutz et al. 2002). We used deletions spanning the entire RNA that eliminate relatively large parts of Xist to analyse H3K27m3 by immunofluorescence in ES cells after induction of transgenic Xist expression (Figure 3). H3K27m3 staining was observed for all Xist mutations tested, with the exception of the ΔXSa deletion, where sequences required for localisation are deleted. The resulting XistΔXSa RNA did not localise well to chromatin and showed consequently greatly diminished potential to silence (Figure S4). We interpret the absence of detectable H3K27m3 in this case as a consequence of the failure of the RNA to localise. All other mutants analysed, including that containing a ΔXN deletion spanning a similar region, gave rise to RNA that localised well to chromatin and caused H3K27m3. A mutant with a deletion of repeat A (T20:ΔSX ES cells; Figure 3), which localises to chromatin but does not cause silencing, was able to induce H3K27m3, suggesting that methylation can be established independent of silencing, a finding consistent with the results of an earlier study (Plath et al. 2003). The expression of the silencing-deficient Xist RNA led to a significantly lower percentage of cells with H3K27m3 foci in interphase nuclei (3- to 4-fold reduction compared to wild-type Xist RNA; Figure 3D). Moreover, on metaphase chromosomes methylation appeared mostly as a single band (only 5% showed a wild-type pattern; Figure 3C). Since the transgene is integrated in the Hprt locus on the X chromosome and the endogenous Xist gene is still present in this cell line, the possibility exists that the transgenic RNA might have stabilised the endogenous Xist RNA or vice versa to effect H3K27m3. To address this point we made use of another cell line in which repeat A was deleted from the endogenous Xist gene and an inducible promoter was inserted by homologous recombination (J1:XistΔSX-tetOP; Wutz et al. 2002). Induction of Xist RNA expression caused H3K27m3 on the single X chromosome in these cells, confirming that H3K27m3 can be established by Xist expression in complete absence of repeat A sequences. However, in undifferentiated ES cells, expression of the silencing-deficient Xist RNA led consistently to lower numbers of cells (30%–35%) showing H3K27m3 staining compared to the wild-type Xist RNA (80%; Figure 3B and and3C).3C). Mono- and dimethylation of H3-K27 were not visibly elevated in J1:XistΔSX-tetOP cells at the expense of the H3K27m3 signal (data not shown), suggesting that recruitment of the Ezh2/Eed complex was impaired in the absence of repeat A, and ruling out the possibility that repeat A would change the specificity of the complex to induce trimethylation activity. Consistent with this interpretation, Ezh2 was observed in only 9% of the J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells compared to 76% of the clone 36 ES cells (see Figures Figures1K1K and S3D). We note that the lower methylation potential of Xist RNA lacking repeat A sequences was only observed in undifferentiated ES cells. When the cells were differentiated, methylation levels were elevated (see Figure S3C). We further determined the role of H4K20m1 in silencing. We detected H4K20m1 upon induction of Xist expression in 14% of the interphase nuclei in undifferentiated J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells, showing that H4K20m1 can be established in the absence of repeat A (see Figure S3D). We conclude that H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 are independent of and not sufficient for silencing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sequences of Xist RNA Required for H3K27m3 Establishment
Efficient H3K27m3 Is Restricted to Early Stages of Differentiation
Xist-mediated transcriptional silencing is restricted in ES cell differentiation in that the potential of Xist to initiate repression diminishes 48 h after differentiation (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). We investigated whether the ability to establish H3K27m3 would be restricted to this initiation window in clone 36 ES cells. These cells carry a puromycin resistance gene (puro), which is cointegrated with the Xist cDNA transgene on Chromosome 11 and can be silenced by transgenic Xist expression. Xist expression was induced either from the beginning or at 24, 48, 72, 96, or 120 h after the onset of differentiation. The ability of Xist to initiate silencing at various time points was monitored by measuring puro expression, and H3K27m3 was analysed in parallel in all cultures at 12 d after differentiation (Figure 4A). When Xist was induced within 24 h of differentiation, H3K27m3 was observed in a large fraction of the cells. Induction of Xist after 24 h led to significantly lower methylation levels (10%–15% of cells; Figure 4A). The efficiency in H3K27m3 pattern establishment correlated at all time points with the potential of Xist to initiate silencing and Ezh2 recruitment (Figure 4B). Hence, an efficient H3K27m3 pattern was established in a time window that overlapped with the window for the initiation of Xist-mediated repression. We also determined the levels of Eed and Ezh2 protein during ES cell differentiation (Figure 4C). Our analysis shows that Eed levels are significantly reduced at day 3 of differentiation and Ezh2 levels diminish more gradually towards even later time points. This demonstrates that the ability of Xist to induce efficient H3K27m3 is restricted at a time when both Eed and Ezh2 proteins are detected in similar amounts, as in undifferentiated ES cells, suggesting that the efficiency of methylation is not a function of the protein levels.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Restriction of H3K27m3 Establishment and Transcriptional Silencing in Differentiation
To confirm this finding, we assayed the effect of induction of Xist expression on H3K27m3 in embryonic fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were isolated from male, day 13.5 embryos carrying an insertion of the doxycycline-inducible promoter in the endogenous Xist locus (Xist-tetOP allele) and a homozygous insertion of the tetracycline-responsive transactivator in the ROSA26 locus (ROSA26-nlsrtTA allele; Wutz et al. 2002; F. Savarese, unpublished data). In these fibroblasts, expression of the endogenous Xist RNA from the single male X chromosome could be induced in 80% of the cells by addition of doxycycline (data not shown). In uninduced cultures and control male fibroblasts no H3K27m3 foci were detected by immunofluorescence in interphase nuclei. However, upon Xist induction 5% (after 48 h of Xist induction) or 15% (after 72 h) of the cells showed focal H3K27m3 staining (H4K20m1 was established, as well; see Figure S3G). In control female fibroblasts H3K27m3 staining was detected in 85% of the cells. This shows that Xist induction in embryonic fibroblasts leads to H3-K27 methylation in a low percentage of cells. We further examined histological sections of male embryos carrying the inducible Xist-tetOP allele and the ROSA26-nlsrtTA allele. Xist expression was induced by feeding doxycycline in drinking water to the mothers for 3 d starting either from day 9.5 or day 13.5 of gestation. Embryos were dissected 3 d later, on day 12.5 and 16.5, respectively. In the sections, 74% (day 12.5 embryos) and 52% (day 16.5 embryos) of the cells expressed Xist, as determined by RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis (Figure 4D and and4E).4E). Focal H3K27m3 staining was detected in 61% of the cells in sections of the day 12.5 embryos but in only 18% of the day 16.5 embryos (Figure 4D and and4E),4E), demonstrating a clear reduction in the number of cells showing H3K27m3 staining in response to Xist expression in the later-stage embryos. In summary, our data demonstrate that Xist has been able to effect H3K27m3 in all cell types tested. However, the efficiency of methylation is regulated in cellular differentiation and development. Our experiments show that Xist is not sufficient for efficient establishment of the H3K27m3 pattern in differentiated cells.
Reversibility of H3K27m3
Once efficient H3K27m3 is established by Xist expression in early ES cell differentiation, it can be maintained throughout differentiation. This would be consistent with the view that lysine methylation is a permanent epigenetic mark. To test whether H3K27m3 is stably maintained in the absence of continuous Xist expression, we tested H3K27m3 reversibility in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells. Xist expression was induced from the transgenic Chromosome 11 in these cells for 3 days, and then the cells were washed and split into medium without doxycycline to shut off Xist expression. H3K27m3 levels and Xist RNA were determined by combined immunofluorescence RNA FISH at consecutive time points at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. High levels of H3K27m3 persisted until 24 h after Xist was turned off, but H3K27m3 disappeared by 48 h (Figures 5A and S3B). Our data show that the Xist RNA signal disappeared by 12 h after the withdrawal of doxycycline, demonstrating that H3-K27 methylation is reversible in undifferentiated ES cells and is removed after a period of approximately two cell divisions following the turning off of Xist expression. We also analysed the reversibility of H4K20m1 and Ezh2 in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells. The percentage of cells showing a signal went from 46% and 70% initially to 5% and 11% at 48 h after withdrawal of doxycycline for H4K20m1 and Ezh2, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kinetic Study of H3K27m3 Stability
To test whether H3K27m3 would become irreversible during ES cell differentiation, we turned off Xist expression in clone 36 ES cells at progressively later time points up to 6 d after initiation of differentiation. The H3K27m3 pattern was analysed in all cultures at day 12 of differentiation. In cells continuously expressing Xist during differentiation, methylation was detected in 60% of the cells at day 12. If Xist expression was turned off at any time points in the course of differentiation, the percentage of cells showing H3K27m3 was reduced to less than 10%, suggesting that methylation was reversible throughout differentiation and not stabilised (data not shown). We then analysed the kinetics of loss of methylation in differentiated ES cells. Clone 36 ES cells differentiated for 4 d in the presence of doxycycline were differentiated for 24, 48, and 72 more hours in the absence of doxycycline, and H3K27m3 was measured (Figure 5C). Focal H3K27m3 staining was initially observed in 97% of interphase nuclei and was reduced to 50% and 25% at 3 and 4 d, respectively, after Xist had been turned off. This shows that the decay of focal H3K27m3 was slower than in undifferentiated ES cells, possibly reflecting the slower cell cycle of differentiating cells.
Early Xist Expression Triggers a Chromosomal Memory Independent of Silencing
Detection of focal H3K27m3 staining persisted throughout ES cell differentiation when Xist was continuously expressed. Yet the methylation mark was reversible throughout ES cell differentiation, and Xist RNA could only establish an efficient methylation pattern during the initiation window early in ES cell differentiation. These observations could indicate that silencing enhances histone methylation in ES cell differentiation. To address this interpretation, we analysed the H3K27m3 pattern caused by expression of a mutant Xist RNA lacking repeat A, which cannot initiate silencing, in differentiating J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells. When these cells were differentiated in the presence of doxycycline, focal H3K27m3 staining was observed in 78% of the cells at day 12 (Figure 6). This clearly indicated that methylation was maintained in a high number of these cells. Silencing is therefore dispensable for methylation in ES cell differentiation. Notably, we observed H3K27m3 staining in a high percentage of differentiated ES cells but in a significantly reduced percentage of undifferentiated ES cells expressing a silencing-defective Xist RNA (see Figure 3B, B,3C,3C, and S3C). Silencing or repeat A sequences are therefore required to sustain high H3K27m3 levels specifically in undifferentiated ES cells but are dispensable upon differentiation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Early Xist Expression Imparts a Chromosomal Memory Independent of Silencing
To test whether continuous Xist expression was required for maintenance of efficient H3K27m3, we induced Xist expression from the transgenic Chromosome 11 in undifferentiated clone 36 cells and from the X chromosome in J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells for 3 d. The cells were then differentiated for 5 d in the presence of doxycycline followed by 5 and 7 d, respectively, without the inducer. At the end of this period H3K27m3 was analysed and could be detected in less than 20% and 10% of the cells, respectively (Figure 6). Parallel cultures were differentiated for 5 d in the presence of doxycycline followed by 4 d in the absence of doxycycline, and then doxycycline was added back for 1 or 3 more days. In these cells, in which Xist had been induced early, H3K27m3 was restored and detectable in 50%–55% of all cells. This level is significantly higher than the level in control cultures that had been induced de novo at day 6 or day 9 of differentiation (10% of all cells). In cells that had been continuously differentiated in the presence of doxycycline, methylation was detected in 73%–78% of the nuclei. Our data show that efficient methylation at late time points in differentiation did not require continuous Xist expression. Efficient remethylation occurred on a chromosome that had been exposed to Xist in early ES cell differentiation, consistent with the idea that Xist triggers a chromosomal change in early differentiation that is remembered until later time points to enhance H3K27m3 reestablishment. Importantly, the silencing-deficient Xist mutant RNA in J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells gave identical results, showing that this memory is established independent of silencing.
We further determined at which time point in differentiation the chromosomal memory is established. For this, clone 36 ES cells were differentiated for 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, or 72 h in the presence of doxycycline. Then Xist was turned off until day 8 of differentiation, when doxycycline was added back, and remethylation was assayed by immunofluorescence at day 13 in differentiation (Figure 7). In this experiment a transition occurred in a 24-h interval around 60 h if Xist was expressed for more than 48 h early in differentiation, allowing for efficient remethylation, a result consistent with the establishment of the memory in this interval. When Xist was turned off earlier than 60 h, remethylation was observed in only 10%–30% of the cells, demonstrating that the memory was not established. Turning off Xist at 72 h or later allowed remethylation in 85% of the cells. We also analysed the transition from Xist-dependent reversible to irreversible silencing in this experiment by Northern analysis of puro expression from the transgenic chromosome in differentiated clone 36 ES cells (Figure 7B). These data show that irreversible silencing was established in an interval between 48 and 72 h in ES cell differentiation, with puro expression levels dropping from 60% to 15% of the level in uninduced samples (Figure 7C), in agreement with our initial report (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). The 24-h intervals for the transition can be explained by the asynchronous cell cycle states in the ES cell culture (doubling time, 21.4 h) at the time when differentiation was induced. We conclude that the establishment of the chromosomal memory is silencing independent and occurs at the time when X inactivation becomes irreversible and Xist independent.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Establishment of Chromosomal Memory during ES Cell Differentiation
Our results identify H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 as specific modifications that mark the Xist-expressing chromosome in undifferentiated ES cells and contribute to the epigenetic histone code of the Xi (Table 1). We did not observe an enrichment of H3K9m2 or H3K9m3 signals on the Xist-expressing chromosome, which has been reported by other studies. This could be a shortcoming of our transgenic system, but we also did not detect the H3K9m2 or H3K9m3 signals in female mouse primary embryonic fibroblasts (less than 2% of the cells). We attribute the different observations in other studies to the various antisera used. We supply peptide blot analysis for our antisera that suggest that the antibodies are highly specific (see Figure S1). This is also supported by the specific staining patterns in immunofluorescence experiments. The lysine 9 methylation signal observed in other studies could potentially be a result of cross reactivity with H3K27m3, a fact we can exclude for our H3K9 antibodies based on the staining pattern and peptide blots. Alternatively, our antibody might not recognise the H3K9m2 modification in the context of the chromosome. However, this is unlikely since the H3K9m3 signals for the pericentric regions and the Y chromosome are clearly identified. The H3K9m2 antiserum has been successfully used in ChIP analysis of the minor centromeric repeats (Yan et al. 2003) and reacts with these repeats in immunofluorescence, but does not show cross reactivity to H3K27m3. This suggests that our reagent is able to detect the modification in both ChIP and immunofluo-rescence experiments. Using highly specific antisera, we failed to see a strong signal for H3K9m2 in either ChIP or immunofluorescence experiments (see Figures Figures22 and S2E). In our ChIP analysis two chromosomal loci showed an increase for H3K9m2 upon Xist expression in differentiated ES cells, suggesting some enrichment for H3K9m2. We take these data to indicate that H3K9m2 is not a prominent mark of X inactivation but might be enriched locally to some degree upon differentiation.
Using Xist alleles that express a mutated version of Xist, which has a deletion of repeat A sequences and is unable to cause silencing, we showed that both H3K27m3 and H4K20m1 were established in the absence of transcriptional repression. This demonstrates that neither modification is sufficient to trigger silencing.
Xist expression led to rapid H3K27m3, which was complete after 1 to 2 d of Xist expression in both ES cells and differentiated cells (see Figure S3A and Figure 6, columns 1 and 2). This kinetics follows the localisation of Xist RNA, which accumulates between 4 and 12 h after doxycycline addition in ES cells (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000), suggesting that H3K27m3 is an immediate effect. We have further shown that in undifferentiated ES cells no progressive accumulation of the histone modifications occurs over time by comparing the percentage of cells showing H3K27m3, H4K20m1, and Ezh2 staining after 3 and 10 d expressing either full-length Xist RNA or a silencing-deficient mutant lacking repeat A (see Figure S3C). We have shown that H3K27m3 is a reversible modification throughout ES cell differentiation and depends at all stages on Xist expression. In undifferentiated ES cells H3K27m3 disappeared 48 h after Xist expression was turned off, corresponding to about two cell divisions. The kinetics would be consistent with the idea that replication is involved in the replacement of methylated histones, albeit our data do not rule out an active enzymatic process of demethylation. Importantly, we have observed nearly unchanged methylation levels 24 h after Xist expression has been turned off (see Figure S3B). This could reflect the intrinsic stability of the trimethylation mark or the persistence of the Eed/Ezh2 complex, which can stably associate with metaphase chromosomes from which Xist RNA is displaced (see Figure 1C; Mak et al. 2002). The transient maintenance of H3K27m3 might be significant for the mechanism of X inactivation. It could explain our observation that the inactive state will be “locked in” roughly 24 h after Xist loses its ability to initiate silencing, it will be locked in at 72 h of ES cell differentiation (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000).
Efficient methylation is established only when Xist expression is induced early in ES cell differentiation. The window in which Xist causes efficient methylation overlaps precisely with the initiation window, in which transcriptional silencing can be initiated. Yet methylation is independent of initiation of silencing. This would be consistent with the notion that H3K27m3 is necessary but not sufficient for silencing. However, this is unlikely, as a previous report has shown that in Eed mutant embryos, initiation of silencing is normal, but a defect in the maintenance of the inactive state leads to reactivation at later stages (Wang et al. 2001). Lower levels of Ezh2 and Eed could explain the restriction on the ability of Xist to induce H3K27m3 efficiently in differentiated ES cells (Silva et al. 2003). We do not favour this interpretation, as this restriction is observed at day 2 in differentiation, when Ezh2 and Eed protein levels are still high (see Figure 4C). Our data further show that the ability to efficiently methylate a chromosome late in ES cell differentiation is a feature of the chromosome and not a function of the protein levels of Eed and Ezh2. This is also in line with our observation that chromosome-wide H3K27m3 in clone 36 ES cells, in which Eed messenger RNA was reduced to 10%–15% of wild-type levels by stable RNAi, was still detected in 45%–60% of cells compared to 80% in control clone 36 cells (data not shown). Therefore, less abundant levels of Eed are sufficient to achieve efficient methylation. Xist induction later in ES cell differentiation or in cells of embryonic origin establishes H3K27m3 in only a small percentage of cells. The significance of H3K27m3 in this small number of cells is unclear at present.
The restriction of efficient methylation to early ES cell differentiation and the finding that methylation is reversible logically require that a chromosomal memory exists that enables H3K27m3 maintenance during differentiation. Previous models have suggested that a lock-in of X inactivation is based on chromosomal silencing, arguing that self-maintaining heterochromatin structures establish the principal form of memory. Our data clearly demonstrate that H3K27m3 is maintained in the absence of transcriptional repression, suggesting a chromosomal memory independent of silencing on the Xi. Using the inducible Xist expression system we have directly demonstrated the chromosomal memory (see Figure 6). A chromosome that had been exposed to Xist and been H3-K27 trimethylated early could be remethylated later in differentiation, after a period where Xist was turned off and methylation decayed, with significantly greater efficiency than a chromosome that had not expressed Xist early (see Figure 6). We have further determined the time point in ES cell differentiation when the chromosomal memory is established and found that it overlaps with the transition from Xist-dependent and reversible silencing to irreversible silencing. These data place the establishment of the memory in a critical phase of X inactivation. We note that the establishment of efficient H3K27m3 in the initiation window and the implementation of the memory are separated by a gap of approximately one cell division in ES cell differentiation. This parallels the gap between initiation of silencing and the maintenance of the silenced state independent of Xist. Our kinetic measurements indicate that H3K27m3 would decay from the Xist-expressing chromosome after two cell divisions; therefore, H3K27m3 could bridge the gap (critical window). We suggest that Xist expression and H3K27m3 might be the signal to recruit a chromosomal memory mediating the lock-in of X inactivation (Figure 8). In this model, silencing would be specified by separate signals depending on repeat A of Xist, which we predict would interact with the memory at the transition from reversible to irreversible and Xist-independent repression. In this regard we note that silencing or repeat A sequences enhance the efficiency of H3K27m3 in undifferentiated ES cells (see Figure 3B). However, there is no requirement for repeat A when ES cells are induced to differentiate (see Figures 6 and S3C). This could point to interactions between the silencing machinery and the Ezh2/Eed methylation complex specifically in ES cells.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Model for the Transition from Initiation to Maintenance of X Inactivation
The molecular basis for the chromosomal memory is presently unknown. Our data rule out the possibility that continuous Xist RNA expression or silencing is required for maintenance of the chromosomal memory and suggest that H3K27m3 is also not involved. The latter interpretation has to be treated cautiously, as it depends on the sensitivity of our assay to detect H3K27m3. Formally it is conceivable that low levels of H3K27m3 undetected by our assay could remain on the chromosome. Presently, it is also unclear what the role of H4K20m1 is and to what extent it interacts with H3K27m3. A H4-K20–specific histone methyltransferase has been identified (Fang et al. 2002; Nishioka et al. 2002; Rice et al. 2002), and we have performed in vitro functional analysis of the mouse Pr-Set7 protein (Figure S5; Protocol S1). Our results indicate that Pr-Set7 is a monomethylase for H4-K20. Its involvement in X inactivation and the function of H4K20m1 remain unclear at present. Future work is needed to identify the components of the memory configuration and to determine its precise function in X inactivation.
Cell lines, culture conditions, and histological sections.
Clone 36 ES cells (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000) and J1:XistΔSX-tetOP, T20:Xist, and ES cells expressing Xist deletions (Wutz et al. 2002) were cultured in DMEM (Biochrome, Berlin, Germany), 15% fetal calf serum (Euroclone, Milan, Italy), and 250 U of LIF/ml as described in those references. ES cells were induced to differentiate in ES medium without LIF by addition of all-trans-retinoic acid to 100 nM as described previously (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). Primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts were derived from day 13.5 embryos and grown in DMEM (Biochrome) and 10% fetal calf serum as described previously (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). Xist expression was induced by the addition of 1 μg/ml of doxycycline to the culture medium or was administered in drinking water (100 mg and 100 g of sucrose per liter). For sections, embryos were sexed (Lambert et al. 2000) and fixed, and 10-μm-thick frozen sections were prepared. Mice were handled according to institutional guidelines.
Immunostaining and Western blot.
For metaphase chromosome spreads, cells were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in RBS solution (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2), centrifuged for 10 min at 1,200 rpm onto Menzel SuperFrost slides (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) using a Cytospin 3 centrifuge (Thermo Shandon, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States). Staining was performed as described previously (Peters et al. 2003). Briefly, slides were extracted for 10 min at room temperature (RT) in KCM (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 120 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% [vol/vol] Tween-20) containing 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton-X100, fixed for 10 min at RT in 2% PFA/PBS, washed in KCM/0.1% Tween-20, and blocked for 30 min at RT in KCM containing 2.5% (wt/vol) BSA, 0.1% Tween-20, and 10% normal goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pennsylvania, United States). Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After washes in KCM/0.1% Tween-20, slides were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT, washed, and mounted (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, United States). For analysis of interphase nuclei, differentiated ES cells were grown on Roboz slides (CellPoint Scientific, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States) and undifferentiated cells were attached to poly-l-lysine coated coverslips or cytospun as described above. Immunostaining was performed as described previously (Peters et al. 2003). Briefly, cells were fixed for 10 min at RT in 2% PFA in PBS, permeabilized for 5 min at RT in 0.1% Na Citrate/0.1% Triton-X100, blocked for 30 min at RT in PBS containing 2.5% (wt/vol) BSA, 0.1% Tween-20, and 10% normal goat serum, and processed as described above.
Antibodies for histone lysine methylation states are described elsewhere (Peters et al. 2003) and were used as follows (metaphase spreads/interphase): α-H3-K9m1 (IgG fraction of α-2x-monomethH3-K9, #4858, 1.7 mg/ml), 1:200/1:500; α-H3-K9m2 (IgG fraction of α-2x-dimeth H3-K9, #4679, 1.7 mg/ml), 1:100/1:200; α-H3-K9m3 (IgG fraction of α-2x-trimeth H3-K9, #4861, 1.3 mg/ml), 1:300/1:500; α-H3-K27m1 (IgG fraction of α-2x-monometh H3-K27, #8835, 0.7 mg/ml), 1:500/1:1,000; α-H3-K27m2 (IgG fraction of α-2x-dimeth H3-K27, #8841, 0.6 mg/ml), 1:500/1:1,000; α-H3-K27m3 (IgG fraction of α-2x-trimeth H3-K27, #6523, 1.1 mg/ml), 1:300/1:500. Additional antibodies were as follows: α-H3-K4m1 (α-monomethyl-Histone H3 [Lys4], #1799; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, New York, United States), 1:400/1:1,000; α-H3-K4m2 (α-dimethyl-Histone H3 [Lys4], #07-030; Upstate), 1:400/1:1,000; α-H3-K4m3 (α-trimethyl-Histone H3 [Lys4], #1819; Upstate), 1:700/1:1,000; α-H4-K20m1 (α-monomethyl-Histone H4 [Lys20], #07-440; Upstate), 1:100/1:200; α-H4-K20m2 (α-dimethyl-Histone H4 [Lys20], #07-367; Upstate), 1:200/1:200; α-H4-K20m3 (α-trimethyl-Histone H4 [Lys20], #07-463; Upstate), 1:350/1:500; polyclonal sheep α-H4Ac (Morrison and Jeppesen 2002), 1:500/1:1,000; polyclonal rabbit α-Ezh2 (Sewalt et al. 1998), 1:100/1:200. Secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, United States) were as follows: Alexa A-11034 Fluor 488 goat antirabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa A-11036 Fluor 568 goat antirabbit IgG (H+L), and Alexa A-21099 Fluor 568 donkey antisheep IgG (H+L), all at 1:500.
For Western blots, total nuclear extract was separated by SDS PAGE, blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States), blocked in blocking solution (PBS, 3% [wt/vol] BSA), and incubated with primary antibodies for 3 h. After washing three times for 10 min in TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) and incubation with secondary antibodies (HRP; Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States), detection was performed using ECL reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). Rabbit polyclonal α-Eed (1:3,500), rabbit polyclonal α-Ezh2 (1:1,000), goat polyclonal α-histone H3 (1:800, #sc-8654; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California, United States), and rabbit polyclonal α-histone H4 (1:300, #07–108; Upstate) were used.
DNA FISH and RNA analysis.
For DNA FISH analysis, biotin-labelled STAR*FISH mouse whole chromosome-specific probes (1187-YMB-02, 1187–11MB-01; Cambio, Cambridge, United Kingdom) were detected with streptavidin, Alexa Fluor 633 conjugateS-21375 (Molecular Probes). RNA FISH probes were generated by random priming (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, United States) using Cy3-dCTP (Amersham). Hybridisation and washing were carried out as described previously (Wutz and Jaenisch 2000). Specimens were analysed using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioplan, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a CCD camera and the MetaMorph image analysis software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States). Northern analysis was performed using 20 μg of RNA (Trizol; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) as described previously (Wutz et al. 2002).
Cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at RT and quenched with 125 mM glycine, and whole-cell extracts were prepared. ChIPs were performed in duplicates as described previously (Martens et al. 2003). Briefly, 400 μg of fragmented chromatin (between 400 and 1000 base pairs) was used for immunoprecipitation, and DNA was extracted from the precipitates and analysed by real-time PCR using a Lightcycler (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Results were corrected for nonspecific binding to the beads and presented as a percentage of the input DNA (4 μg of fragmented chromatin, 100%). Primers sequences were as follows: tubulin, CCTGCTGGGAGCTCTACT and GGGTTCCAGGTCTACGAA; puromycin, GCTGCAAGAACTCTTCCTC and GCCTTCCATCTGTTGCTG; d11mit117, AAAAGACCCTATTTACAATACAACTGA and TGTCATTTTTGATTAATCGCTCC; d11mit108, GGCACAAGAAAGACACAGCA and AAAGAGAAACCCCAGAGGGA; d11mit102, CCAGGAGAGCAGGAAGGTC and TCCTTCTGGGTGCTGCAT; d15mit15, AGCATACACTCTTGTTCCTGCT and AATAAATACCAGAGAAGCACCGTG.
Figure S1: Specificities of H3-K9, H3-K27, H4-K20, and H3-K4 Mono-, Di-, and Trimethyl Antibodies
Immunodotblot analysis (Peters et al. 2003) of the antisera used to detect specific methylation states of histone H3 on Lysine 9 (A), H3 on Lysine 27 (B), H4 on Lysine 20 (C), and H3 on Lysine 4 (D). IgG fractions of the methyl-lysine histone antibodies were tested at various dilutions, with the most optimal dilution being displayed. Dotblots contain 0.4, 2, 10, and 50 pmol of linear H3 (amino acids 1–20; amino acids 19–34; amino acids 25–45; amino acids 72–91) and peptides, either unmodified or mono-, di-, or trimethylated at the K4, K9, K27, K36, or K79 positions. In addition, a linear H4 (amino acids 12–31) peptide, mono-, di-, or trimethylated at the K20 position, was also used.
(611 KB PDF).
Figure S2: Histone Modification Pattern of the Inactive X Chromosome
Immunofluorescence staining of metaphase spreads of clone 36 ES cells induced to express Xist for 3 d using H3K27m1 (A), H3K27m2 (B), H3K27m3 (C), H3K9m1 (D), H3K9m2 (E), H3K9m3 (F), H4K20m1 (G), H4K20m2 (H), H4K20m3 (I), H3K4m3 (J), and H4Ac (K) antisera. Chromosome 11 was identified by a DNA FISH probe (red; blue, DAPI) in (J) and (K). Clone 36 ES cells grown in the absence of doxycycline are used as a control for the H4Ac staining without Xist expression (L).
(4.8 MB TIF).
Figure S3: Initiation and Maintenance of Histone Methylation during Differentiation
(A) The kinetics of H3K27m3 was measured in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells. The number of cells showing H3K27m3 staining 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after induction of Xist expression is shown.
(B) The stability of H3K27m3 was determined in undifferentiated ES cells. The percentage of metaphase chromosome spreads (n > 150) showing H3K27m3 staining was analysed in undifferentiated clone 36 ES cells, which expressed Xist for 3 d (lane 1) or were further grown without inducer for 24 h (lane 2) or 48 h (lane 3). This experiment complements data presented in Figure 5A and and5B5B providing a ‘cell cycle synchronous' view of the H3K27m3 decay kinetics.
(C) Levels of H3K27m3 were measured in undifferentiated ES cells after 3 and 10 d of Xist expression. No progressive accumulation over time was observed, indicating that the steady state of H3K27m3 has been reached at 3 d Xist expression. However, a marked increase in methylation is observed in J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells upon differentiation for 2 d (hatched bar).
(D) Combined Xist RNA FISH (red) immunofluorescence analysis of Ezh2 and H4K20m1 in undifferentiated J1:XistΔSX-tetOP cells expressing Xist for 3 and 10 d (percentage of nuclei showing a staining is given). Analysis of H3K27m3 and H4 acetylation using an antiserum specific for multiply acetylated forms of H4 in clone 36 and J1:XistΔSX-tetOP ES cells that were grown for 4 d in the presence of doxycycline and then shifted to differentiation conditions for 2 d more in the presence of doxycylcine.
(E) Male primary mouse fibroblasts (PMEFs) hemizygous for the inducible Xist-tetOP allele and homozygous for the tetracycline-inducible transactivator were induced with doxycycline for 2 d (lane 1) or 3 d (lane 2), and the number of cells showing H3K27m3 staining in interphase was analysed. Control female PMEFs showed a methylation signal in the large majority of cells (lane 3); uninduced male PMEFs were always negative.
(F) Representative indirect immunofluorescence of uninduced (top) and induced (bottom) male Xist-tetOP PMEFs. The inducible Xist RNA triggers less pronounced and less dense foci of H3-K27 trimethylation (green) compared to the female wild-type control.
(G) Upon Xist expression, H4-K20 monomethylation (green) is observed in interphase Xist-tetOP PMEFs (left). Focal enrichment colocalises with the site or Xist RNA clusters (red) on the X chromosome. Female wild-type PMEFs (right).
(3.0 MF TIF).
Figure S4: Analysis of the XistΔXSa Mutation
The XistΔXSa transgene was integrated by Cre-mediated recombination into the Hprt locus on the single X chromosome in T20 ES cells (Wutz et al. 2002). A schematic representation of the Xist cDNA in given (top): repeats A to E are indicated by arrays of triangles, sequences mediating localisation to chromatin are indicated by boxes underneath (degree of hatching represents importance), and the location of the deletion is indicated by a coloured box. RNA localisation was analysed by FISH (lower left), showing that the RNA localises in small clusters in some cells. The ability of the RNA to induce silencing was measured by cell survival of differentiating cultures under induced versus uninduced conditions (lower right). Controls are cells either having a fully functional Xist cDNA transgene (Xist) or a cDNA lacking repeat A that is incompetent to induce silencing (ΔSX). The ΔXSa RNA shows poor silencing activity, presumably as a consequence of its failure to localise well to the chromosome.
(1.5 MB TIF).
Figure S5: Selective H4-K20 Monomethylation Activity of Mouse Pr-Set7 In Vitro
(A) Schematic presentation of full-length mouse PR/SET domain-containing protein 07 (Pr-Set7), indicating SET domain in black (gi:38080595). Below, region tested for histone methyltransferase (HMTase) activity.
(B) Coomassie stain (left) shows purified recombinant GST-tagged Pr-Set7 (arrow), H4 peptides (arrowhead), and histones used for in vitro reactions with S-adenosyl-[methyl-14C]-L-methionine as methyl donor. Fluorography (right) indicates HMTase activity on the unmodified H4 peptide comprising residues 12–31 of the histone H4 N-terminus. Notably, no further methyl groups could be transferred to the same peptide if it had been synthetically monomethylated at residue H4 lysine 20 (K20m1) before usage in the in vitro reaction. Free histones are not accepted as substrate.
(C) Fluorography indicates histone H4 HMTase activity of GST–Pr-Set7 selective for the unmodified histone H4 peptide (12–31). H4-K20 monomethylation obviously is the terminal state for Pr-Set7, because synthetically mono- (K20m1), di- (K20m2), and trimethylated H4 peptides (K20m3) could not be significantly methylated.
(948 KB TIF).
Protocol S1: Supplementary Methods
(22 KB DOC).
We thank Antoine Peters and Karen Ng for comments on the manuscript, Arie Otte for the Ezh2 antiserum, Andreas Bichl and Mijo Dezic for maintenance of the mouse colony, Karl Mechtler for peptide synthesis, and Peter Steinlein and Gotthold Schaffner for technical help. This research was supported by grants from the Austrian GEN-AU initiative financed by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture. JM is the recipient of a long-term European Molecular Biology Organization fellowship. The Research Institute of Molecular Pathology is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim.
ChIPchromatin immunoprecipitation
ES cellembryonic stem cell
FISHfluorescent in situ hybridization
H3-K9histone H3 lysine 9
H3K27m3histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation
HMTasehistone methyltransferase
PMEFprimary mouse fibroblast
RTroom temperature
Xiinactive X chromosome

Conflicts of Interest. The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Author Contributions. AK, FS, ML, JM, TJ, and AW conceived and designed the experiments. AK, FS, ML, JM, and AW performed the experiments. AK, FS, ML, JM, and AW analyzed the data. AK, TJ, and AW contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. AK, TJ, and AW wrote the paper.
Academic Editor: Peter Becker, Adolf Butenandt Institute
  • Borsani G, Tonlorenzi R, Simmler MC, Dandolo L, Arnaud D, et al. Characterization of a murine gene expressed from the inactive X chromosome. Nature. 1991;351:325–329. [PubMed]
  • Brockdorff N. X-chromosome inactivation: Closing in on proteins that bind Xist RNA. Trends Genet. 2002;18:352–358. [PubMed]
  • Brockdorff N, Ashworth A, Kay GF, Cooper P, Smith S, et al. Conservation of position and exclusive expression of mouse Xist from the inactive X chromosome. Nature. 1991;351:329–331. [PubMed]
  • Brown CJ, Ballabio A, Rupert JL, Lafreniere RG, Grompe M, et al. A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Nature. 1991;349:38–44. [PubMed]
  • Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science. 2002;298:1039–1043. [PubMed]
  • Csankovszki G, Nagy A, Jaenisch R. Synergism of Xist RNA, DNA methylation, and histone hypoacetylation in maintaining X chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:773–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Czermin B, Melfi R, McCabe D, Seitz V, Imhof A, et al. Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell. 2002;111:185–196. [PubMed]
  • Fang J, Feng Q, Ketel CS, Wang H, Cao R, et al. Purification and functional characterization of SET8, a nucleosomal histone H4-lysine 20-specific methyltransferase. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1086–1099. [PubMed]
  • Heard E, Rougeulle C, Arnaud D, Avner P, Allis CD, et al. Methylation of histone H3 at Lys-9 is an early mark on the X chromosome during X inactivation. Cell. 2001;107:727–738. [PubMed]
  • Keohane AM, O'Neill LP, Belyaev ND, Lavender JS, Turner BM. X-Inactivation and histone H4 acetylation in embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 1996;180:618–630. [PubMed]
  • Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2893–2905. [PubMed]
  • Lambert JF, Benoit BO, Colvin GA, Carlson J, Delville Y, et al. Quick sex determination of mouse fetuses. J Neurosci Methods. 2000;95:127–132. [PubMed]
  • Mak W, Baxter J, Silva J, Newall AE, Otte AP, et al. Mitotically stable association of polycomb group proteins Eed and Enx1 with the inactive X chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1016–1020. [PubMed]
  • Marahrens Y, Loring J, Jaenisch R. Role of the Xist gene in X chromosome choosing. Cell. 1998;92:657–664. [PubMed]
  • Martens JH, Verlaan M, Kalkhoven E, Zantema A. Cascade of distinct histone modifications during collagenase gene activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:1808–1816. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Min J, Zhang Y, Xu RM. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1823–1828. [PubMed]
  • Morrison H, Jeppesen P. Allele-specific underacetylation of histone H4 downstream from promoters is associated with X-inactivation in human cells. Chromosome Res. 2002;10:579–595. [PubMed]
  • Muller J, Hart CM, Francis NJ, Vargas ML, Sengupta A, et al. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell. 2002;111:197–208. [PubMed]
  • Nishioka K, Rice JC, Sarma K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Werner J, et al. PR-Set7 is a nucleosome-specific methyltransferase that modifies lysine 20 of histone H4 and is associated with silent chromatin. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1201–1213. [PubMed]
  • O'Neill LP, Randall TE, Lavender J, Spotswood HT, Lee JT, et al. X-linked genes in female embryonic stem cells carry an epigenetic mark prior to the onset of X inactivation. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1783–1790. [PubMed]
  • Penny GD, Kay GF, Sheardown SA, Rastan S, Brockdorff N. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature. 1996;379:131–137. [PubMed]
  • Perez-Burgos L, Peters AH, Opravil S, Kauer M, Mechtler K, et al. Generation and characterization of methyl-lysine histone antibodies. Methods Enzymol. 2004;376:234–254. [PubMed]
  • Peters AH, Mermoud JE, O'Carroll D, Pagani M, Schweizer D, et al. Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is an epigenetic imprint of facultative heterochromatin. Nat Genet. 2002;30:77–80. [PubMed]
  • Peters AH, Kubicek S, Mechtler K, O'Sullivan RJ, Derijck AA, et al. Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1577–1589. [PubMed]
  • Plath K, Fang J, Mlynarczyk-Evans SK, Cao R, Worringer KA, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science. 2003;300:131–135. [PubMed]
  • Rice JC, Nishioka K, Sarma K, Steward R, Reinberg D, et al. Mitotic-specific methylation of histone H4 Lys 20 follows increased PR-Set7 expression and its localization to mitotic chromosomes. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2225–2230. [PubMed]
  • Santos-Rosa H, Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Sherriff J, Bernstein BE, et al. Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature. 2002;419:407–411. [PubMed]
  • Sewalt RG, van der Vlag J, Gunster MJ, Hamer KM, den Blaauwen JL, et al. Characterization of interactions between the mammalian polycomb-group proteins Enx1/EZH2 and EED suggests the existence of different mammalian polycomb-group protein complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3586–3595. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Silva J, Mak W, Zvetkova I, Appanah R, Nesterova TB, et al. Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev Cell. 2003;4:481–495. [PubMed]
  • Wang J, Mager J, Chen Y, Schneider E, Cross JC, et al. Imprinted X inactivation maintained by a mouse Polycomb group gene. Nat Genet. 2001;28:371–375. [PubMed]
  • Wutz A, Jaenisch R. A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. Mol Cell. 2000;5:695–705. [PubMed]
  • Wutz A, Rasmussen TP, Jaenisch R. Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat Genet. 2002;30:167–174. [PubMed]
  • Yan Q, Huang J, Fan T, Zhu H, Muegge K. Lsh, a modulator of CpG methylation, is crucial for normal histone methylation. EMBO J. 2003;22:5154–5162. [PubMed]
Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science