Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of foodscispringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen ChoiceThis journal
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 July; 52(7): 4146–4155.
Published online 2014 July 8. doi:  10.1007/s13197-014-1441-4
PMCID: PMC4486539

The influence of different polymers on viability of Bifidobacterium lactis 300b during encapsulation, freeze-drying and storage


Seven different types of natural polymers namely hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), sodium-carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), starch BR-07, starch BR-08, dextrin and pullulan were used in order to develop the optimal formula for the entrapment of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B in Ca-alginate based granules. Laminar flow drip casting with Brace-Encapsulator was used in order to prepare the granules. The results showed that alginate/pullulan and alginate/HPMC formulation provide high protection for the bacterial strain used for encapsulation. These two formulations were further used to obtain freeze dried granules, for which the viability in time and at different temperatures was tested. The final results showed a higher viability than the level of the therapeutic minimum (>107 CFU/g) after 15 days of storage. Other parameters like entrapment efficiency, production rate, sphericity, flowability were also discussed.

Keywords: Bioencapsulation, Biomaterials, Viability, Bifidobacteria, Granules Production

A wide range of fields such as foods, pharmaceutics, environmental protection, and biotechnology, benefits from the utilization of valuable microbial cells. Nevertheless, pure active agents, as probiotics are difficult to handle in their respective form (Brandau 2002) and are likely to degradation when exposed to environmental conditions.

The growing interest in microorganisms, living cells and other functional molecules encapsulation (Dalmoro et al. 2012b; Dalmoro et al. 2012a) has its origin in the lack of stability and target release of currently used formulations and in the attempt to provide appropriate growth conditions and protection (Rathore et al. 2013).

Numerous studies have been focused on microencapsulation of probiotic cells as a technique capable of cell loss limitation, insurances of mechanical stability, isolation, protection and target/controlled release (Albertini et al. 2010; Betoret et al. 2011; Burgain et al. 2011; Rathore et al. 2013). Major challenges, for the probiotic cells survival, include not only the complex and hazy events that occur during passage through the gastrointestinal tract (Savard et al. 2011), but also the adverse circumstances during processing and storage of the granules that serve as carriers for the active cells. Many food components may interact with the active cells, as polysaturated fatty acids and phytochemicals, or with the protective walls, as acidic food products (Vidhyalakshmi et al. 2009), of the granules. It is therefore, mandatory that the encapsulation technique protects the cells during the whole period of processing, storage and ensures, last but certainly not least, the target release. The efficiency of added probiotics in different functional foods (Stanton et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2014) depends on their level and viability, which must be maintained during storage (Vidhyalakshmi et al. 2009).

In recent years, medical scientists have developed an increase interest on probiotics, as Bifidobacterium lactis (Prasanna et al. 2014), for human consumption due to the benefits they confer to the humoral immune system (Cui et al. 2000), how they affect the intestinal microflora balance (McMaster et al. 2005), and their antimicrobial properties, which serve to inhibit gastrointestinal pathogens (Haros et al. 2007).

In a dripping process, the shape, the structure and the size of the granules is strongly influenced by the matrix used in the encapsulation process (Chan et al. 2011b). Chan et al. (2011a) related the survival of the encapsulated probiotic cell to the structural integrity of the granules. Alginate based granules are frequently used for the entrapment of probiotics (Anal and Singh 2007; Brinques and Ayub 2011; Burgain et al. 2011), due to its biodegradability and biocompatibility, resistance in acidic conditions, successful release in intestinal media (Sultana et al. 2000) its thermo tolerance and freeze-drying resistance (Cheow and Hadinoto 2013).

Natural polymers with valuable physical and biochemical proprieties, can improve the alginate based granules characteristics. This can be transposed in higher entrapment efficiency, improvement and enhance of the probiotic cells stability in the product until consumption better protection in biological environments.

The aim of this study was to investigate the entrapment of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B in Ca-alginate based granules, in order to obtain adequate physical and biochemical properties that sustain the viability of the cells. Seven different encapsulation matrices were used: three types of celluloses, two types of starch, dextrin and pullulan.

Materials and methods

Probiotic strain

In the present study, Bifidobacterium lactis 300B was used as probiotic strain. The strain was purchased as lyophilized probiotics powder from Howaru, Germany. The probiotic was used as received from the supplier. A viability test was performed before each trial. All materials and solutions were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. prior utilization.

Encapsulation of probiotic cells

Lyophilized probiotic, 75 g/L, were encapsulated using cross linking gelation. The encapsulation formulation consists in 15 g/L alginate (FMC, Norway) and 15 g/L filler material. The Spherisator M, type 2002SP-AE5-D0 was used in the granules formulation process, at Brace GmbH Germany. The slurry and the polymers were pumped from the feed tank to the nozzle head where the vibrating device induces the breakup of the flow into uniform droplets. These are formed into spheres by the surface tension of the feed. The droplets are solidificated during falling into the hardening bath. The obtained granules were hardened for 30 min in calcium chloride 40 g/L (Brenntag, Australia), the hardening bath, and then rinsed with sterile sodium chloride 8.5 g/L (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). The filler used for encapsulation of the probiotic powder, and each sample codification are shown in Table 1 The entrapment efficiency of the fresh granules was determined according to (Sandoval-Castilla et al. 2010) with slight change as follows:

Table 1
Bifidobacterium Lactis 300B encapsulation formulation

Entrapment efficiency = (a × F/b) × 100 (CFU/g)

Where a is CFU/g in the granules, and b is CFU/g in the biopolymer slurry before production, and F is the sphere packing factor (Aste and Weaire 2008). We considered the cubical densest package for all calculations F = 0.70 (Aste and Weaire 2008; Holleman et al. 1985).

Mixture properties

The density of the alginate-filler mixture was calculated using the mass (m) and volume (V) ratio

ρm/V g/cm3

The viscosity was measured with an HAAKE viscometer VT-02 (ThermoFisher, Germany) at 23 ± 1 °C, for each sample after sterilization and cooling down. The value for the surface tension of the alginate based solutions at 15 g/L was obtained from Chan et al. (2011a) and considered constant for all seven samples.

Micrometrics properties

Granules size and shape

The size of the granules was determined using the method described by Chan et al. (2011b) with slight change as follows.

Theoretical diameter of detached liquid drop, Dl(T) (mm):

DI(T) = (6dTγ/ρg)1/3

were dT is the capillary tip diameter (mm); γ is surface tension (g/s2); ρ is density (g/mm3); and g is gravitational acceleration (mm/s2).

Corrected diameter of detached liquid drop, Dl(C) (mm):


where kLF is the liquid lost factor, kLF = 0.98  0.04dT.

Corrected diameter of Ca–alginate granules after gelation, Db(C) (mm):


where kSF is the shrinkage factor attributed to the gelation process, which was found to be for Ca- alginate granules kSF(gelation) = 0.88 (Chan et al. 2011b). The shrinkage factor is given by the ratio of the diameter of the granules before gelation and the diameter of the granules after gelation.

The reduction in granules size after lyophilization was calculated and expressed by a shrinkage factor, as shown below:

kSF(lyophilization) = (Db − Db(lyophilized))/Db

where kSF(lyophilization) is the shrinkage factor attributed to the lyophilization process; Db is the diameter of the granules obtained as described above before lyophilization (mm); and Db(lyophilized) is the diameter of the granules obtained after lyophilization (mm).

Determination of granules shape

The granules shape was quantified using the sphericity factor (SF), which is given by the following equation:

Sphericity factor (6) (SF) = (dmaxdmin)/(dmax + dmin)

where dmax is the largest diameter and dmin is the smallest diameter perpendicular to dmax.

Tweenty granules were used for each determination of the dmax and dmin and the average was calculated. The dmax And dmin was obtained using a microscope.

Determination of bulk density, tapped density and flowability

The bulk density (ρBD) of the lyophilized granules was determined by pouring a known mass of granules (mp) into a calibrated cylinder, and it was calculated by dividing the mass (mp) by the bulk volume (vB), as shown in following equation:


The tapped density (ρTD) was determined by tapping a calibrated cylinder containing granules until the equilibrium tap volume (vT) was obtained. The tapping was performed until no volume change was observed. Hausner’s ratio of microcapsules was computed according to the following equation:

Hausner ratioρTD/ρBD

The Hausner ratio is a parameter that inversely influence the granule flowability.

Granules freeze-drying

Freeze drying is more suitable than other drying process (e.g. spray drying) for some bacterial strains (Capela et al. 2007; Johnson and Etzel 1995). The fresh obtained granules were shock frozen at -18 °C and connected to a VaCo 5 freeze dryer from Zirbus (Germany) at once and freeze dried at -50 °C and 0.05 mbar for 24 h. The fresh granules were connected to the freeze drier using sterile bottom flasks, for etch sample was weight approximately 30 g. The freeze dried material was collected sterile recipients. Samples were analyzed immediately and after 3, 6, 9 and 15 days at room temperature (~22 °C) and refrigeration (~4 °C) in order to determine the evolution of cell viability in time and at different temperatures.

Probiotic cells viability

Non-encapsulated and encapsulated Bifidobacterium lactis 300B were enumerated immediately after the encapsulation, and freeze drying process respectively, using the plate counting method, on BSM agar (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). The granules were dissolved completely in sodium citrate (20 g/L) with an adjusted pH = 7.3, before enumeration of viable cells. Dilutions steps 1:10 were performed in saline solution (8.5 g/L). From the last three dilutions, one ml of the dilution was introduced in the Petri dish where the nutrient agar medium was added. The operation was repeated three times for each dilution. After 72 h incubation at 37 °C in the anaerobic jar (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) the number of colony-forming units (CFU) was counted. Colonies of bacteria were calculated and converted to log10 CFU.

The survival of bacteria cells in each of the freeze-dried samples tested was determined using the mathematical formula: (9) survival = (n/n0), where “n0” is the number of bacteria per gram of wet granules before drying, and “n” is the number of the freeze-dried granules right away after drying (Simpson et al. 2005). The viability of the cells as a function of storage time, at room temperature and at 4 °C was obtained by calculating the ratio: (CFU/g of granules after 3, 6, 9 and 15 days storage/CFU/g of granules immediately after freeze-drying).

Statistical analyses

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to all data for the alginate based granules in all samples in order to determine differences between the log10 CFU/g of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B granules of the different treatments: right away after encapsulation, after freeze drying and at the end of the storage time (3, 6, 9 and 15 days). The mean values and the standard error were calculated from the triplicate data. The statistical evaluation was carried out using Graph Prism Version4.0 (Graph Pad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). For the size determination, all the calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010.

Results and discussion

Microencapsulation yield and granules properties

Throughput and processing conditions were investigated in order to evaluate the possibility of industrial scale production of probiotic entrapment in one of the formulations described above. It was found that the production of granules, in terms of quantity and quality, was influenced by the nature of the seven types of filler material used for the Bifidobacterium lactis 300B entrapment. This production was for laboratory purpose. Scaling up the process for small industrial production would be possible with slight modifications to the process, and according to Brandau (2002), it is suitable for large industrial production. The production of 600 g/h, the value obtained in our study, is an easily achievable outcome. Future attempts resulting in the production of higher outputs ranging from 3.6 kg/h to 10 kg/h may be reasonably expected.

As can be observed in Fig. 1, in terms of production per minute, the highest throughput is obtained for the samples AS08, AP and AS07 in this order.

Fig. 1
Throughput of alginate based granules production. ((●) sample AHPMC, (■) sample ACMC, (▲) sample AMCC, ([triangle]) sample AS07, (♦) sample AS08, ([white circle]) sample AD, ([rev bullet]) sample AP)

The production for the samples AHPMC- 580 g/h, ACMC-537,4 g/h and AD-552,4 g/h are similar while the sample AMCC- 441 g/h, shows the lowest production rate.

High entrapment capacity was observed for all formulations, as is represented in Fig. 2. In our study, the entrapment efficiency of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B into the granules varied between 57.20 and 69.96 %. In the literature (Jyothi et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2005) the entrapment efficiency data is linked to the viability losses in the granules. The highest entrapment efficiencies were obtained for the samples AHPMC, AP and AS07 in this order. Due to theirs excellent physicochemical and mechanical properties, HPMC, pullulan and starch enhance the alginate action. The granules filled with microcrystalline cellulose (sample AMCC) and dextrin (sample AD) showed the lowest entrapment efficiency, but not statistically significantly lower than the other samples. The rest of the alginate based granules, respectively the ones using the two types of cellulose and starch BR-08 as fillers showed similar trends. Our results concerning the entrapment efficiencies when using the different cellulose types and starch as fillers agree with those previously found by Nochos et al. (2008) and Sultana et al. (2000).

Fig. 2
Entrapment efficiency in alginate based granules for each sample (mean ± SD, n = 3, P > 0,05)

Micrometric properties

Granules size and shape

The various granule formulations show an average particle size in the range of 1054–1066 μm.

As can be seen in Table 2, similar trends can be observed for all formulations in the dripping and gelation processes regarding the size of the granules. Furthermore, in the Table 2 can be observed that the drop size decreased consistently along the hardening process.

Table 2
Density and viscosity of the mixture, nozzle size and the calculated diameters

The factors affecting the size of the granules involve the viscosity of the polymer solution, the diameter of the nozzle and the distance between the outlet and the coagulation solution (Anal et al. 2003; Anal and Singh 2007; Anal and Stevens 2005) and the manufacturing methods used (Grabnar and Kristl 2011). In our study for all the samples the same size diameter of the nozzle was used. A correlation between the size of the obtained granules and the viscosity can be observed. The sample AHPMC, the less viscous from the samples, with 190 (mPa · s) viscosity hade the biggest diameter, 1.0668 mm. This kind of correlation between the viscosity and the granules size underlined also by other studies (Chan et al. 2011b; Chandramouli et al. 2004). Similar trends were observed for the samples AD, AS07, AS08, ACMC and AP with no significant differences neither when the viscosity is discussed nor the diameter of the obtained granules.

In the vibration dip casting, the drop was formed by a vibration system. When the droplet was extruded by the flow rate, it broke up with the vibration under resonance, the liquid drop detached from the nozzle and immerse into the hardening bath where bound ions and create linkages lead to the gel formation. Granules were smaller than the drop detached from the nozzle, a phenomenon attributed to the syneresis effect happened in the formed gel. The calculated diameters of the granules after gelation were found to give a nigh approximation to the obtained experimentally as can be observed in Table 2.

Previous reports (Donati et al. 2005) have shown that the shrinkage factor, which is influenced by the M/G (mannuronic/glucuronic acid) ratio of the alginate, can be used to correct the diameter of the granules after gelation. Chan et al. (2011a) have shown that low viscosity of the filler leads to high shrinkage factor. In accordance to what was previously found, this trend is also observed in the present work as can be seen in Fig. 3. In our study, the highest amount of shrinkage of the lyophilized granules is attributed to AHPMC and AD, the samples that proved the lowest viscosity of the mixture. The least amount of shrinkage can be attributed to the samples ACMC and AP due to the same motive regarding the viscosity (Nienaltowska et al. 2010). A similar trend can be seen with SiO2 as filler (Brandau 2002).

Fig. 3
Effect of viscosity of the samples on the shrinkage factor of lyophilized Ca-alginate based granules

The shape of the alginate based granules was delineating using the sphericity factor due to its effectiveness in determining shape changes. A perfect sphere is defined by a sphericity factor equal to 0; meanwhile, the elongated objects have values of the sphericity factor approaching to unity. According to Goh et al. (2012) a high concentration of polymer leads to an increased sphericity. In the present study, all the obtained granules have hade spherical shape in spite of the type of the filler. The lyophilization process induced a deformation tin the structure of the granules caused by the sublimation of the water from the hydrogel matrix. This fact resulted in granules with an unpredictable and irregular shape, occurrence observed in former studies (Chan et al. 2011b; Rassis et al. 2002; Zohar-Perez et al. 2004). Nevertheless, in our study, the deformation of the granules was attenuated by the different fillers used as can be observed in Table 3, were the sphericity factor of the lyophilized granules is presented.

Table 3
Sphericity factor (SF) of the lyophilized granules

Bulk, tapped density and flowability

Generally, entrapment efficiency is used as a quality parameter for the dried granules. Nevertheless, other assessed quality control parameters as bulk density, tapped density and the Hausner Ratio provided the powder flowability (Kennedy and Panesar 2006). The results obtained for these quality parameters in this study are presented in Table 4.

Table 4
Bulk density, Tapped density and flowability of the lyophilized granules

The bulk density can be defined as the mass of granules divided by the total volume occupied, which includes the granules volume, the inter-particle void volume and the internal pore volume. In the present study, the results indicate that the bulk density of the samples ranges from 0.18 to 0.28 g/cm3. As it is well-known, a dry product with a high bulk density can be stored in a smaller container than a product with a relatively lower bulk density.

Tapped density refers to the bulk density of the granules after a specified compaction process. The variation of tapped density in our study was from 1.20 to 0.32 g/cm3. In this study, it was found that the tapped density was the highest in samples AMCC, AP, ACMC and AS07, and the tapped density was found to be higher than the bulk density. A correlation between the viscosity of the sample and the densities was found. The sample AMCC and AP show the highest values of viscosity, and also the highest values for the densities. The same tendency was observed in all the samples. This behavior was also observed in previous work (Chan et al. 2011b) where the difference of the samples viscosity was due to various concentrations of the filler.

The Hausner ratio of a granular material is defined as a measure of the interparticle friction or cohesiveness of the material (Kennedy and Panesar 2006). The description of granules degree of compaction is defined by this ratio, and it can be defined as the ratio of the tapped density to the bulk density. The presence of high inter-particle friction is indicated by a larger value (Abdullah and Geldart 1999). The friction is affected by the class of material used; the granules size and shape, the surface, the size distribution, the atmospheric conditions (humidity and temperature) and the inter-particle forces (e. g. cohesion and electrostatics).

A higher Hausner ratio means that the material is more cohesive and less able to flow freely. A Hausner ratio of less than 1.5 has been used to indicate good flowability (Thalberg et al. 2004) since particles at this ratio show little potential for further consolidation. In this study, all lyophilized granules were free flowing as indicated by Hausner ratios ranging from 1.07 to 1.16. In spite of this quality, the highest Hausner ratio was observed for the sample AMCC, which shows an increased inter-particle friction. The sample AHPMC showed the lowest Hausner ratio value followed by the sample AP. However, the Hausner ratio of the granules were similar despite the type of the filler. Chan et al. (2011b) correlate the values of the Hausner ratio with the concentration of the polymer rather than with the type of the filler. In our study, the similarity can be derived from the fact that was not a significant difference in regarding the size of the obtained granules.

Entrapment of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B in fresh granules

The entrapment of cells is influenced by the encapsulation process. The counts of the encapsulated cells were calculated based on the ratio of viable cells after encapsulation over the initial number of viable cells in the slurry.

Entrapped cells survival after the encapsulation process decreased in all the cases. However, the granules matrix composition provided a different degree of protection to the entrapped cells resulting in different survivability values. The encapsulation procedure was the same for all seven samples. It can be observed a greater number of surviving cells, by providing Bifidobacterium lactis 300B with a proper covering matrix. It is reported in the literature (Rodriguez-Huezo et al. 2007) that the oxygen protection immediately after gelation has a beneficial effect by reducing the decaying rate of cells consistently. The specific property of pullulan to form strong, oxygen-impermeable films is consistent reported (Leathers 2003; Singh et al. 2008).

This statement supports our results, shown in Fig. 4 where the survival rate of the probiotic cells under the same conditions is observed, indicating that the formulation of sample AP, were the pullulan filler was used, offer the best protection, providing a value of 1013 CFU/g immediately after encapsulation. The granules where the HPMC filler was used, reduce, to some extent, the protective effect, but the survivability is still high compared to the rest of the samples: 1012 CFU/g compared to 109 CFU/g the mean of the rest samples. It is interesting to observe that this granules variation was also positive for the freeze drying process and storage conditions.

Fig. 4
Viability of anaerobic bacteria in the slurry and loaded in the seven types of alginate based granules after encapsulation, expressed as log10 CFU/g. The error bars represents standard deviation of the means

The number of live cells found in the granules after the encapsulation process influences the number of living cells that will be found in any final product. Chan et al. (2011b) correlate the survival of entrapped cells after the encapsulation process to the physical properties of the granules. Our results fell in between because the samples with HPMC, pullulan and starch showed the best physical properties (in this order), while the best survival rate was observed in the alginate/pullulan formulation. In this specific case, the oxygen protection of pullulan balanced the expense of the physical properties.

Viability after freeze drying process

The application of shock freeze to the fresh granules caused considerably less shrinkage (data not show). For all the samples, the reduction in mass was greater than 92 %. This value is important in the scaling up process.

The freezing rate controls the nucleation and growth of ice crystals that are necessary to initiate the freezing process (Maa and Prestrelski 2000). Slow freezing creates conditions that allow the ice nuclei to grow into larger crystals. Rapid freezing affects mainly the number of the nuclei and not their size. However, fast freezing creates smaller ice crystals than slow freezing (Maa et al. 1999; Maa and Prestrelski 2000). These findings are associated with changes of protein state, as well as of the cells phospholipid membrane, during the freeze drying process. The deteriorative reactions are: damages created by large crystals to the cell membrane, and freezing induced unfolding of proteins. This process affects the survivability of the entrapped cells as is evident in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
Survival of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B before and after freeze drying in samples AHPMC and AP. The error bars represents standard deviation of the means

Since the AP and AHPMC samples proved to be the best formulae for entrapment of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B we decided to analyse the survival rate in these freeze dried granules. In order to prevent the rupture of the probiotic membrane by the large ice big crystals formed in a slow freezing process, the samples were shock frozen at -18 °C for 30 min.

The number of encapsulated cells in the freeze dried granules were calculated based on the ratio of viable cells after freeze drying over the initial number of viable cells in the fresh made granules is shown in Fig. 5. A higher survival rate of Bifidobacterium is observed in both samples. Such behavior can be attributed to the cell wall and membrane composition of Bifidobacterium (Carvalho et al. 2004). A 14.16 % and 17.98 % loss of cell viability was registered in the AHPMC respectively AP granules in the freeze drying process. For the freeze drying of the nonencapsulated Bifidobacterium, the literature (Capela et al. 2006) reports a mean of 77.78 % survival. This fact demonstrated that the encapsulation applied in this research sustains the viability of the probiotic cells during freeze drying process.

Stability of entrapped cells in freeze dried granules

Survivability of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B loaded in AP and AHPMC granules has the tendency to decline during storage. The survival was maintained at 1010 CFU/g after 15 days of storage at room temperature and 4 °C for alginate/pullulan based granules and for the alginate/HPMC cellulose based granules at 107 CFU/g after 15 days at room temperature and 109 CFU/g after 15 days at 4 °C. These results are comparable with the literature (Homayouni et al. 2008) which used encapsulation, in alginate/starch granules, of Bifidobacterium lactis for long term protection in lyophilized ice cream.

The influence of the temperature on freeze dried alginate/pullulan and alginate/HPMC cellulose based granules is shown in Fig. 6. A temperature close above 0 °C generally leads to higher survival compared to more elevated storage temperatures (Endo et al. 2014; Heidebach et al. 2009; Picot and Lacroix 2004; Weinbreck et al. 2010), because lower temperatures result in reduced rates of detrimental chemical reactions, such as fatty acid oxidation (Tanghe et al. 2003). In addition, the freeze dried granules kept at refrigeration temperature demonstrated better protection for the entrapped anaerobic bacteria compared to the granules stored at room temperature in our study too (Homayouni et al. 2008) affirms that the survival of bacteria against unfriendly conditions is species dependent also. Our study’s results show that Bifidobacterium lactis 300B after 15 days at room temperature and at refrigeration, is maintained to the level of the therapeutic minimum (>107 CFU/g) or higher. The HPMC cellulose filling was found to increase the survivability of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B during storage at room temperature (Klayraung et al. 2009), nevertheless, the pullulan filler proved even a higher protection at room temperature as it is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
Survivability of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B in freeze dried granules after 3, 6, 9 and 15 days kept at room temperature and at 4 °C. Symbols: (●) 4 ºC alginate/pullulan granules, (■) room temperature ...


This study compared the effect of seven types of fillers, namely HPMC, Na-CMC, MCC, starch BR-07, starch BR-08, dextrin or pullulan, on the viability of Bifidobacterium lactis 300B entrapped in alginate based granules, during encapsulation, freeze drying and storage for different periods of time. Parameters like entrapment efficiency, production rate, sphericity, flowability were also discussed.

Our study has indicated that the survival of immobilized bacteria may be dependent on the properties of the adding filler, which influences the granule’s characteristics. Among the seven types of fillers utilized in the encapsulation formula from this research, the pullulan and HPMC provide the highest protection. The viability recorded after encapsulation was 1013 CFU/g for the alginate/pullulan granules and 1012 CFU/g for the alginate/HPMC granules. The alginate/dextrin type of granules proved to have a lower viability rate after encapsulation, 106 CFU/g, while a similar behavior was determined for the two types of starches and cellulose with 109 CFU/g. Encapsulation formulas, alginate/pullulan and alginate/HPMC, were effective in keeping the counts of probiotic bacteria higher than the level of the therapeutic minimum (>107 CFU/g) in the freeze dried form. In conclusion, encapsulation in alginate/pullulan granules offers an effective means of protection in the freeze drying process and storage. Future work is needed to analyze the resistance of entrapped cells in different products and in the gastrointestinal tract. Cryo- and osmo-protective components can be incorporated into the matrix increasing the survival of cells during processing and storage. Finally, a further surface coating can be applied in order to enhance a specific delivery. From the economic standpoint, the technique described in this paper is suitable for industrial production.


This work was carried out at Brace GmbH - Karlstein am Main, Germany. The authors would like to thank Dr. Holger Strohm and Mr. Manfred Stöckl for their helpful collaboration during the experimental work.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in concerning this article. This paper was published under the frame of European Social Fund, Human Resources Development Operational Programme 2007-2013, project no. POSDRU/159/1.5/S/132765. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Contributor Information

Oana Lelia Pop, Phone: +4 0748488933, or.julcvmasu@pop.anao.

Thorsten Brandau, Phone: +49 6188 991757.

Jens Schwinn, Phone: +49 6188 991757.

Dan Cristian Vodnar, Phone: +4 0747341881.

Carmen Socaciu, Phone: +4 0741115673, or.julcvmasu@uicacos.nemrac.


  • Abdullah EC, Geldart D. The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators. Powder Technol. 1999;102(2):151–165. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00208-3. [Cross Ref]
  • Albertini B, Vitali B, Passerini N, Cruciani F, Di Sabatino M, Rodriguez L, Brigidi P. Development of microparticulate systems for intestinal delivery of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis. E J Pharm Sci. 2010;40(4):359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.04.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Anal AK, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2007;18(5):240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004. [Cross Ref]
  • Anal AK, Stevens WF. Chitosan-alginate multilayer beads for controlled release of ampicillin. Int J Pharm. 2005;290(1–2):45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.11.015. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Anal AK, Bhopatkar D, Tokura S, Tamura H, Stevens WF. Chitosan-alginate multilayer beads for gastric passage and controlled intestinal release of protein. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(6):713–724. doi: 10.1081/DDC-120021320. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Aste T, Weaire D. The pursuit of perfect packing, second edition. 2. Northwestern: Taylor and Francis group; 2008.
  • Betoret E, Betoret N, Vidal D, Fito P. Functional foods development: trends and technologies. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2011;22(9):498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.004. [Cross Ref]
  • Brandau T. Preparation of monodisperse controlled release microcapsules. Int J Pharm. 2002;242:179–184. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00151-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brinques GB, Ayub MAZ. Effect of microencapsulation on survival of Lactobacillus plantarum in simulated gastrointestinal conditions, refrigeration, and yogurt. J Food Eng. 2011;103(2):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.10.006. [Cross Ref]
  • Burgain J, Gaiani C, Linder M, Scher J. Encapsulation of probiotic living cells: from laboratory scale to industrial applications. J Food Eng. 2011;104(4):467–483. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.031. [Cross Ref]
  • Capela P, Hay TKC, Shah NP. Effect of cryoprotectants, prebiotics and microencapsulation on survival of probiotic organisms in yoghurt and freeze-dried yoghurt. Food Res Int. 2006;39:203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.07.007. [Cross Ref]
  • Capela P, Hay TKC, Shah NP. Effect of homogenisation on bead size and survival of encapsulated probiotic bacteria. Food Res Int. 2007;40(10):1261–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.08.006. [Cross Ref]
  • Carvalho AS, Silva J, Ho P, Teixeira P, Malcata FX, Gibbs P. Relevant factors for the preparation of freezedried lactic acid bacteria. Int Dairy J. 2004;14:835–847. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.02.001. [Cross Ref]
  • Chan E-S, Lim T-K, Voo W-P, Pogaku R, Tey BT, Zhang Z. Effect of formulation of alginate beads on their mechanical behavior and stiffness. Particuology. 2011;9(3):228–234. doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2010.12.002. [Cross Ref]
  • Chan E-S, Wong S-L, Lee P-P, Lee J-S, Ti TB, Zhang Z, Poncelet D, Ravindra P, Phan S-H, Yim Z-H. Effects of starch filler on the physical properties of lyophilized calcium-alginate beads and the viability of encapsulated cells. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(1):225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.044. [Cross Ref]
  • Chandramouli V, Kailasapathy K, Peiris P, Jones M. An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions. J Microbiol Methods. 2004;56(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.09.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cheow WS, Hadinoto K. Biofilm-like lactobacillus rhamnosus probiotics encapsulated in alginate and Carrageenan microcapsules exhibiting enhanced thermotolerance and freeze-drying resistance. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(9):3214–3222. doi: 10.1021/bm400853d. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cui J-H, Goh J-S, Kim P-H, Choi S-H, Lee B-J. Survival and stability of bifidobacteria loaded in alginate poly-l-lysine microparticles. Int J Pharm. 2000;210(1–2):51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00560-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dalmoro A, Barba AA, Lamberti G, Grassi M, d'Amore M (2012a) Pharmaceutical applications of biocompatible polymer blends containing sodium alginate. Adv Polym Tech 31(3):219–230
  • Dalmoro A, Barba AA, Lamberti G, d'Amore M (2012b) Intensifying the microencapsulation process: ultrasonic atomization as an innovative approach. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 80(3):471–477 [PubMed]
  • Donati I, Holtan S, Morch YA, Borgogna M, Dentini M, Skjak-Braek G. New hypothesis on the role of alternating sequences in calcium-alginate gels. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(2):1031–1040. doi: 10.1021/bm049306e. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Endo A, Terasjarvi J, Salminen S. Food matrices and cell conditions influence survival of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG under heat stresses and during storage. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;174:110–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.01.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Goh CH, Heng PWS, Chan LW. Alginates as a useful natural polymer for microencapsulation and therapeutic applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.012. [Cross Ref]
  • Grabnar PA, Kristl J. The manufacturing techniques of drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles from preformed polymers. J Microencapsul. 2011;28(4):323–335. doi: 10.3109/02652048.2011.569763. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Haros M, Bielecka M, Honke J, Sanz Y. Myo-inositol hexakisphosphate degradation by Bifidobacterium infantis ATCC 15697. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;117(1):76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.021. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Heidebach T, Forst P, Kulozik U. Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins. Food Hidrocolloid. 2009;23(7):1670–1677. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.01.006. [Cross Ref]
  • Holleman AF, Wiberg E, Wiberg N (1985) Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie (Inorganic Chemistry Manual). 91-100 edn. Walter de Gruyter,
  • Homayouni A, Azizi A, Ehsani MR, Yarmand MS, Razavi SH. Effect of microencapsulation and resistant starch on the probiotic survival and sensory properties of synbiotic ice cream. Food Chem. 2008;111(1):50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.036. [Cross Ref]
  • Johnson JAC, Etzel MR. Properties of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ-32 attenuated by spray-drying, freeze-drying, or freezing. J Dairy Sci. 1995;78(4):761–768. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76687-5. [Cross Ref]
  • Jyothi NVN, Prasanna PM, Sakarkar SN, Surya Prabha K, Ramaiah PS, Srawan GY (2010) Microencapsulation techniques, factors influencing encapsulation efficiency. J Microencapsul 27(3):187–197 [PubMed]
  • Kennedy JF, Panesar PS. C. Onwulata (Ed.), encapsulated and powdered foods, CRC press, Taylor and Francis group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;63(4):569.
  • Klayraung S, Viernstein H, Okonogi S. Development of tablets containing probiotics: effects of formulation and processing parameters on bacterial viability. Int J Pharm. 2009;370(1–2):54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.11.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Leathers TD. Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2003;62:468–473. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1386-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maa YF, Prestrelski SJ. Biopharmaceutical powders: particle formation and formulation considerations. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2000;1(3):283–302. doi: 10.2174/1389201003378898. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Maa YF, Nguyen P-A, Sweeney T, Shire SJ, Hsu CC. Protein inhalation powders: spray drying vs spray freeze drying. Pharm Res. 1999;16(2):249–254. doi: 10.1023/A:1018828425184. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McMaster LD, Kokott SA, Reid SJ, Abratt VR. Use of traditional African fermented beverages as delivery vehicles for Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 10140. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;102(2):231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.013. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nienaltowska K, Perfetti G, Meesters GMH, Ronsse F, Pieters JG, Dewettinck K, Depypere F. Attrition strength of water-soluble cellulose derivatives coatings. Powder Technol. 2010;198(2):298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.026. [Cross Ref]
  • Nochos A, Douroumis D, Bouropoulos N. In vitro release of bovine serum albumin from alginate/HPMC hydrogel beads. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;74(3):451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.03.020. [Cross Ref]
  • Picot A, Lacroix C. Encapsulation of bifidobacteria in whey protein-based microcapsules and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int Dairy J. 2004;14(6):505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.10.008. [Cross Ref]
  • Prasanna PHP, Grandison AS, Charalampopoulos D. Bifidobacteria in milk products: an overview of physiological and biochemical properties, exopolysaccharide production, selection criteria of milk products and health benefits. Food Res Int. 2014;55:247–262. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.11.013. [Cross Ref]
  • Rassis DK, Saguy IS, Nussinovitch A. Collapse, shrinkage and structural changes in dried alginate gels containing fillers. Food Hidrocolloid. 2002;16(2):139–151. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00071-6. [Cross Ref]
  • Rathore S, Desai PM, Liew CV, Chan LW, Heng PWS. Microencapsulation of microbial cells. J Food Eng. 2013;116(2):369–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.12.022. [Cross Ref]
  • Reid AA, Vuillemard JC, Britten M, Arcand Y, Farnworth E, Champagne CP (2005) Microentrapment of probiotic bacteria in a Ca(2+)-induced whey protein gel and effects on their viability in a dynamic gastro-intestinal model. J Microencapsul 22(6):603–619 [PubMed]
  • Rodriguez-Huezo ME, Duran-Lugo R, Prado-Barragan LA, Cruz-Sosa F, Lobato-Calleros C, Alvarez-Ramirez J, Vernon-Carter EJ. Pre-selection of protective colloids for enhanced viability of Bifidobacterium bifidum following spray-drying and storage, and evaluation of aguamiel as thermoprotective prebiotic. Food Res Int. 2007;40(10):1299–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.09.001. [Cross Ref]
  • Sandoval-Castilla O, Lobato-Calleros C, Garcia-Galindo HS, Alvarez-Ramirez J, Vernon-Carter EJ. Textural properties of alginate-pectin beads and survivability of entrapped Lb. casei in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Food Res Int. 2010;43(1):111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.010. [Cross Ref]
  • Savard P, Lamarche B, Paradis M-E, Thiboutot H, Laurin E, Roy D. Impact of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5-containing yoghurt, on fecal bacterial counts of healthy adults. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;149(1):50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.026. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Simpson PJ, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Intrinsic tolerance of Bifidobacterium species to heat and oxygen and survival following spray drying and storage. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(3):493–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02648.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Singh RS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF. Pullulan: microbial sources, production and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;73(4):515–531. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Stanton C, Gardiner G, Meehan H, Collins K, Fitzgerald G, Lynch PB, Ross RP (2001) Market potential for probiotics. Am J Clin Nutr 73 (2):476S-483s [PubMed]
  • Sultana K, Godward G, Reynolds N, Arumugaswamy R, Peiris P, Kailasapathy K. Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria with alginate-starch and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;62(1–2):47–55. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00380-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tanghe A, Van Dijck P, Thevelein JM (2003) Determinants of Freeze Tolerance in Microorganisms, Physiological Importance, and Biotechnological Applications. In: Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol Volume 53. Academic Press, pp 129-176 [PubMed]
  • Thalberg K, Lindholm D, Axelsson A. Comparison of different flowability tests for powders for inhalation. Powder Technol. 2004;146(3):206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.08.003. [Cross Ref]
  • Vidhyalakshmi R, Bhakyaraj R, Subhasree RS. Encapsulation “the future of probiotics”-a review. Advanced in Biological Research. 2009;3(3–4):96–103.
  • Weinbreck F, Bodnar I, Marco ML. Can encapsulation lengthen the shelf-life of probiotic bacteria in dry products? Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;136(3):364–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang L, Huang S, Ananingsih VK, Zhou W, Chen XD. A study on Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 viability in bread during baking. J Food Eng. 2014;122:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.08.029. [Cross Ref]
  • Zohar-Perez C, Chet I, Nussinovitch A. Irregular textural features of dried alginate-filler beads. Food Hidrocolloid. 2004;18(2):249–258. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00081-X. [Cross Ref]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer