PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjcrBMJ Case ReportsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015: bcr2014208942.
Published online 2015 April 24. doi:  10.1136/bcr-2014-208942
PMCID: PMC4420833
Case Report

Renal infarction caused by medium vessel vasculitis

Abstract

A 44-year-old Italian man presented to the emergency department on three occasions over 4 days with severe left flank pain. Initial investigations including a renal tract ultrasound were normal and he was discharged with analgaesia. On his third presentation, a CT angiogram was performed due to persisting pain, which demonstrated infarction of his left kidney as well as thickening of the anterior branch of left renal artery and complete occlusion with focal intimal dissection of the coeliac artery. His antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody was negative. A medium vessel vasculitis was suspected and confirmed on positron emission tomography-CT, which revealed increased metabolic activity involving the right internal mammary artery and coeliac artery. Treatment with pulse methylprednisolone was started followed by a tapering prednisolone regimen, with a rapid reduction in his inflammatory indices. Twenty-four months later his renal function remains normal off all immunosuppression.

Background

The vasculitides are rare (20 cases per million) inflammatory diseases of the blood vessel walls. Diagnosing this condition is important as, if left untreated, it can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The inflammatory process in vasculitides may be primary (idiopathic) or secondary to underlying diseases, often infections and are traditionally classified by the size of the blood vessels affected.1 2 Small vessel vasculitides such as microscopic polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Henoch-Schonlein purpura and cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis, frequently involve the kidneys and cause glomerular inflammation, which can lead to renal failure.3 Medium vessel vasculitides, including polyarteritis nodosa, are associated with renal and intestinal infarction.4

Signs and symptoms depend on the organs involved and the clinical presentation can vary from non-specific constitutional symptoms to life-threatening bleeding.5 A high index of suspicion is often required to make the diagnosis and investigations should include assessment for autoantibodies and infectious agents, including hepatitis B virus. Key aims are to identify secondary causes and to uncover the extent of the disease. Definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of vascular involvement by either biopsy or imaging.5

Renal infarction due to vasculitis is an uncommon presentation that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of loin pain and haematuria. Our case highlights the role modern imaging techniques play in establishing the diagnosis.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 2-day history of sudden onset non-radiating sharp left flank pain that was associated with nausea and vomiting. His medical history included a non-obstructive renal calculus treated with lithotripsy and alopaecia universalis. There was no family history of renal disease. He was an ex-smoker and did not consume alcohol. He had never used illicit drugs. His examination findings were normal. A urine dipstick demonstrated trace amounts of protein and blood and a renal calculus was suspected. He proceeded to have a CT of the kidney, ureter and bladder, which revealed an oedematous left kidney. The radiological differential diagnoses included a renal calculus that had passed or pyelonephritis; however, the urine dipstick did not suggest infection. The patient was therefore presumed to have a kidney stone and discharged home with oral analgaesia.

He re-presented the next day with worsening left flank pain and nausea. This settled with analgaesia and he was again discharged after a few hours. He then re-presented to the emergency department for the third time with similar symptoms, but on this occasion was noted to have raised inflammatory markers and a slightly elevated serum creatinine level. A Nephrology opinion was sought. A renal Doppler was performed, which was normal followed by a CT angiogram because of ongoing haematuria. This revealed a partially infarcted left kidney with a thickened anterior branch of the left renal artery and complete occlusion with focal intimal dissection of the coeliac artery (figures 1 and and22).

Figure 1
Infarction of the anterior half/two-thirds of the left kidney.
Figure 2
CT angiogram showing small focal area of dissection at the coeliac axis.

A screen for autoimmune and infectious diseases was negative and due to the risks associated with attempting to biopsy the affected vessels, an 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) scan was organised. The scan revealed intense activity in the right internal mammary artery; and coeliac axis consistent with vasculitis (figures 3 and and4)4) and no FDG activity were noted in the left kidney due to tissue necrosis. In the absence of an identifiable cause, a decision was made to treat this as an autoimmune condition, and the patient was pulsed with 500 mg intravenous methylprednisolone daily for 3 days, followed by oral prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day. His inflammatory markers rapidly improved after initiating steroid therapy, which was weaned over 2 months to 5 mg/day. He was not able to tolerate the steroid sparing agent azathioprine, so continued on prednisolone for a further 3 months. He remains in clinical remission with normal inflammatory markers 24 months following his initial presentation.

Figure 3
Positron emission tomography–CT scan showing moderate activity at coeliac axis.
Figure 4
Positron emission tomography–CT scan showing moderate activity along the right internal mammary artery.

Investigations

Initial blood tests revealed elevated inflammatory markers with a white cell count of 14.3 cells×109/L, C reactive protein of 370 mg/L and ESR of 45 mm/h, and his creatinine at presentation was 87 µmol/L. Antinuclear antibody, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, antistreptolysin O, anti-DNAseB, complement levels and hypercoagulability screen were normal. Hepatitis, HIV, Q fever, Epstein-Bar virus and cytomegalovirus serology were negative. 18F-FDG PET revealed moderate FDG uptake along the right internal mammary artery and moderate activity at the coeliac axis.

Follow-up blood tests and ultrasonography 3 months postdiagnosis revealed normal biochemistry, renal function and inflammatory markers with normal renal anatomy.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of loin pain and haematuria in a 44-year man includes renal or ureteric calculi, pyelonephritis, trauma, polycystic kidney disease, renal tumours (benign or malignant), infarction or papillary necrosis and glomerulonephritis. It is indeed difficult to distinguish these causes based on history alone, and in recurrent presentations special investigations are required to understand the aetiology and to guide appropriate management.

Treatment

Our patient was pulsed with 500 mg intravenous methylprednisolone over 3 days, followed by oral prednisolone at 1 mg/kg daily, which was weaned over 2 months. He did not tolerate azathioprine, so was maintained on 5 mg oral prednisolone for a further 3 months. On recent review 24 months after his initial presentation, he remains in remission off all immunosuppression (figure 5).

Figure 5
The chart shows the trend of inflammatory marker C reactive protein (CRP—primary Y axis in mg/L) and glucocorticoid dosage in milligrams in the secondary Y axis.

Outcome and follow-up

In this patient with medium vessel vasculitis we report an excellent clinical outcome with corticosteroid immunosuppression, with preserved renal function and no clinical manifestations of disease on follow-up. Although a repeat PET-CT was requested to confirm the remission, he declined to attend.

Discussion

In patients without significant atherosclerotic disease or other risk factors for arterial occlusion (such as atrial fibrillation), vasculitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of renal infarction. The patient in our case report was discharged three times from the emergency department with oral analgaesics for a presumed renal calculus even with no evidence of a stone on imaging. Despite the elevated inflammatory markers noted at the time of admission, our patient did not have constitutional symptoms such as fatigue, fever or arthralgias, and did not have systemic signs such as skin lesions, hypertension or neurological dysfunction, which are common in other medium vessel vasculitides such as polyarteritis nodosa. In addition, his CT angiogram did not reveal any small or large vessel aneurysms, and FDG uptake was absent in the left kidney due to underlying infarction secondary to thrombosed anterior branch of the left renal artery.

Renal infarction is uncommon and often associated with underlying conditions such as atrial fibrillation, cholesterol emboli or infective endocarditis. Although medium vessel vasculitis can cause renal infarction, other clinical features are usually present such as purpura, myalgia, weight loss, neuropathy and skin rash.3 4 Non-invasive imaging methods including 18F-FDG PET CT may provide additional information to assist in the diagnosis and management of vasculitis.4 6–8

This case highlights an unusual presentation of vasculitis and the utility of non-invasive imaging studies in making a diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is established, if no secondary causes are evident, corticosteroid-based immunosuppression can be highly efficacious in inducing remission.

Learning points

  • A high index of suspicion is required to diagnose vasculitides due to their rarity.
  • Clinical presentations are variable and usually involve the presence of constitutional symptoms.
  • Advances in imaging, such as 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography CT, can help make the diagnosis.
  • Early diagnosis and intervention may reduce the risk of organ dysfunction.
  • Primary vasculitides may respond well to immunosuppressive therapy.

Footnotes

Twitter: Follow Vinothkumar Kavarthapol Jayaraman at @kj_vino

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

1. Takahashi K, Oharaseki T, Yokouchi Y et al. [Overview of the 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides (CHCC2012)]. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi 2014;56:70–9. [PubMed]
2. Jennette JC. Overview of the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:603–6 doi:10.1007/s10157-013-0869-6 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Jennette JC, Falk RJ The pathology of vasculitis involving the kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24:130–41 doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80171-5 [PubMed]
4. Lightfoot RW Jr, Michel BA, Bloch DA et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of polyarteritis nodosa. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1088–93 doi:10.1002/art.1780330805 [PubMed]
5. Gross WL, Trabandt A, Reinhold Keller E Diagnosis and evaluation of vasculitis. Rheumatology 2000;39:245–52 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.245 [PubMed]
6. Einspieler I, Thürmel K, Eiber M et al. First experience of imaging large vessel vasculitis with fully integrated positron emission tomography/MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1117–19 doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000778 [PubMed]
7. Soussan M, Abisror N, Abad S et al. FDG-PET/CT in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis: case-series and literature review. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:125–31 doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.09.009 [PubMed]
8. Ozcakar ZB, Abisror N, Abad S et al. Polyarteritis nodosa: successful diagnostic imaging utilizing pulsed and color Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography. Eur J Pediatr 2006;165:120–3 doi:10.1007/s00431-005-0012-0 [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group