PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2015 February 13; 290(7): 4410–4421.
Published online 2014 December 30. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M114.593673
PMCID: PMC4326846

Lignin-rich Enzyme Lignin (LREL), a Cellulase-treated Lignin-Carbohydrate Derived from Plants, Activates Myeloid Dendritic Cells via Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4)

Abstract

Lignin-carbohydrates, one of the major cell wall components, are believed to be the structures that form chemical linkage between lignin and cell wall polysaccharides. Due to the molecular complexity of lignin-containing substances, their isolation and the assignment of their biological activities have so far remained a difficult task. Here, we extracted two lignin-containing carbohydrates, lignin-rich enzyme lignin (LREL) and pure enzyme lignin (PEL), from barley husk and demonstrated that they act as immune stimulators of dendritic cells (DCs), which are particularly important in linking innate and adaptive immunity. Thioacidolysis, acid hydrolysis, and mild alkali hydrolysis of both LREL and PEL revealed that their immunostimulatory activities depended on the lignin structure and/or content, neutral sugar content (especially the characteristic distribution of galactose and mannose), and presence of an ester bond. Furthermore, we showed that the immunostimulatory potency of the lignin-carbohydrate depended on its molecular weight and degree of polymerization. We also demonstrated that the LREL-induced activation of DCs was mediated via TLR4. Thus, LREL-induced increases in the expression levels of several cell surface marker proteins, production of inflammatory cytokines IL-12p40 and TNF-α, and activation and nuclear translocation of transcription factors, as was observed in the WT DCs, were completely abrogated in DCs derived from the TLR4−/− mice but not in DCs derived from the TLR2−/−, TLR7−/−, and TLR9−/− mice. We further demonstrated that LRELs isolated from other plant tissues also activated DCs. These immunostimulatory activities of lignin-carbohydrates, extracted from edible plant tissues, could have potential relevance in anti-infectious immunity and vaccine adjuvants.

Keywords: Dendritic Cell, Innate Immunity, Interleukin, Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF), Barley, Lignin-Carbohydrate

Introduction

Lignin is a major class of natural products found in various plants by phenolic oxidative coupling processes (1). It has been proposed earlier that lignin macromolecules are formed by random dehydrogenative polymerization of the three major phenylpropane units, known as guaiacyl (G)3 (derived from coniferyl alcohol), syringyl (S) (derived from synapyl alcohol), and p-hydroxyphenyl (H) (derived from p-coumaryl alcohol) (2). The amount and composition of lignins vary among taxa, cell types, and individual layers of the cell wall, and both are also influenced by developmental and environmental cues (3). Although there are some exceptions, lignins from dicotyledonous plants are principally composed of G and S units and traces of H units, whereas lignins from monocotyledonous plants contain comparable levels of G and S units and have more H units than dicotyledonous plants (4). Some polysaccharides in the cell walls are linked to lignin through hydroxycinnamic acids by forming ester-ether bridges to form structurally complex lignin-carbohydrates (5,7). Because of the molecular complexity of lignin-carbohydrates, stable preparation of lignin has proven to be difficult, and as a result, very little attention has been paid to the biological activities of lignins or lignin-containing substances. Although several earlier reports indicated a link between lignin and immunostimulation (8,10), analytical procedures used in these studies were not very clear and remained controversial as well. Additionally, lignin-containing substances used in these studies probably did not occur naturally because they were either extracted using harsh chemical methods (such as strong alkaline extraction) or were extracted from something unusual. In this report, we have succeeded in fractionating analytically obvious lignin-containing substances by enzyme treatment, which is a naturally occurring phenomenon during the action of digestive enzymes, and then we determined their biological activity and mechanism. As our primary source for isolating lignin, we used barley husk, which is a major byproduct of the malting and brewing industry. In the barley seed, husk is the only tissue that is highly lignified, and it is mainly composed of hemicellulose (about 30%), cellulose (about 27.7%), lignin (about 23%), and a small amount of ash and proteins (11).

Dendritic cells (DCs) are particularly important immune cells linking innate and adaptive immunity due to their deployment at barrier sites of antigen encounter, trafficking to central lymphoid sites of T cell recruitment, and exquisite tissue and environmental regulation of their antigen-presenting traits (12, 13). Upon activation, expressions of MHC proteins and costimulatory molecules, such as CD86, on the cell surface of DCs are up-regulated, and secretions of various cytokines, especially those of inflammatory cytokines, from these cells are increased. As a result of DC activation, the acquired immune system, such as cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity, is activated (14, 15).

Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which constitute a family of pattern recognition receptors, recognize specific molecular patterns in pathogenic microbial components and also in some endogenous ligands, and they act as the first line of defense against many bacteria and play an important role in the innate immune system (16,19). It is well established that TLR stimulation leads to DC activation by activation and nuclear translocation of transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), interferon regulatory factor 3/7 (IRF3/7), and/or activator protein-1 (AP-1) either via the MyD88-dependent pathway or via the TIR-domain containing adaptor protein inducing interferon beta (TRIF)-dependent pathway (20,22). The signaling cascade varies according to the TLR type, and TLR4 is the only TLR that activates both MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways (20).

Because we always ingest lignins through dietary consumption of vegetables and other plant products, we hypothesized that the naturally extracted lignins, and not the chemically extracted ones, might have innate immunomodulating activities. We also hypothesized that the immunomodulating activity of lignin is mediated via the TLRs, which are the major receptors related to innate immunity. In the present study, we showed that lignin-rich enzyme lignin (LREL) and pure enzyme lignin (PEL) stimulated DCs and were analytically obvious lignin-carbohydrates. We also provided evidence that the immunostimulatory activity of LREL was indeed induced via the TLR4 signaling pathway. These results provided some new insights into the immunologic profile of the host response to lignin-carbohydrates, and they might be pertinent to lignin's utility in host defense against microbial or viral infection and also against cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Plant Materials

Barley husk was a kind gift from KIRIN Brewing Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Wheat bran was purchased from Nisshin Seifun Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Rice husk, cinnamon bark, sesame seeds, green tea leaf, and turmeric rhizome were purchased from various commercial sources in Japan.

Lignin Extraction

Lignin was extracted from plant samples following a previously published protocol with some modifications (23). The extraction method is schematically described in Fig. 1. Briefly, the air-dried samples were incubated overnight in toluene/ethanol (2:1, v/v) to remove wax residues. The dewaxed samples were crushed into powders using a multibead shocker (Yasui Kikai, Tokyo, Japan) and then passed through a 200-μm size screen. The ground samples were extracted twice (12 h each time) with a dioxane/water mixture (90:10, v/v), followed by another extraction with a dioxane/water mixture (50:50, v/v) for 12 h. All three extractions were carried out at room temperature in the dark. Liquids obtained from these three extractions were combined into one composite sample, and dioxane was removed by using a rotary vacuum evaporator (EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). The hemicellulose-rich milled lignin (HRML) was obtained from the leftover liquid by precipitation with 4 volumes of ethanol. The pure milled lignin (PML) was obtained by lyophilizing the supernatant from ethanol precipitation. After the extraction of HRML and PML, the dioxane/water-extracted residues were washed with water more than once and then treated with a mixture of same volume of Aspergillus niger cellulase (Sigma) and A. niger hemicellulase (Sigma) (32 mg/ml each enzyme) dissolved in 0.2 m sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.8) at 37 °C for 72 h. After filtration through a nylon cloth, the insoluble residues were washed with a large amount of water, and the LREL and PEL samples were obtained by successive extractions with 90 and 50% dioxane/water as before. Klason lignin content in each fraction was determined by measuring the yield of insoluble residues after treating with sulfuric acid according to the standard procedure with slight modification as described previously (24). The sulfuric acid-soluble fraction was used for determining the neutral sugar composition (see below). Milled wood lignin (MWL) and the lignin-carbohydrate complex (LCC) were prepared from beech (Fagus crenata) using their extractive-free wood meals according to the conventional method (25, 26).

FIGURE 1.
Scheme for isolation of ball-milled and enzyme-treated lignin from plant tissues. Lignins were extracted from ball-milled and enzyme-treated plant tissue powders using dioxane/water mixtures, followed by fractional precipitation with ethanol, as described ...

Mice

6–10-week-old female C57BL/6N wild-type mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Japan (Kanagawa, Japan). TLR1−/−, TLR2−/−, TLR4−/−, TLR6−/−, TLR7−/−, TLR9−/−, and MyD88−/− mice with the C57BL/6N genetic background were obtained from Oriental Bioservice (Kyoto, Japan). All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals of KIRIN Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

Culture of Bone Marrow (BM)-derived DCs and Measurement of Immunostimulatory Activity

Flt-3L-induced BM-derived DCs (BM-DCs) were generated as described previously (27). In brief, BM cells were isolated from C57BL/6J, and erythrocytes were removed by a short exposure to 0.168 m NH4Cl. Cells were cultured at a density of 5 × 105 cells/ml for 7 days in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mm sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 2.5 mm HEPES (Invitrogen), 50 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), 50 μm β-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), 10% FCS, and 100 ng/ml Flt-3L (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Lignin was added at a concentration of 1 ng/ml to 100 μg/ml, and cultures were maintained in the incubator for another 24 h. The immunostimulatory activities of lignin substances were measured by following the expression levels of cell surface markers by FACS (BD Biosciences) and by measuring the concentration of inflammatory cytokines in the cell culture supernatant by ELISA (see below). As positive controls, we used cells treated with 10 ng/ml LPS (Sigma).

Antibodies

The following fluorescent dye-conjugated anti-mouse mAbs were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA): CD11c-PE-Cy7 (N418), CD40-FITC (HM40-3), CD80-APC (16-10A1), CD86-APC (GL1), PD-L1-PE (M1H5), ICOS-L-PE (HK5.3), and MHC class II-FITC (M5/114.15.2). Fluorescent dye-conjugated anti-mouse mAb CD11b-APC-Cy7 (M1/70) was purchased from BD Pharmingen. For the receptor inhibition assay, monoclonal anti-mannose receptor (clone 15-2) antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-mouse dectin-1 monoclonal (clone 2A-11) antibody was purchased from AbD Serotec (Oxford, UK).

FACS Analysis

Cells for FACS analysis were stained with the appropriate fluorescent dye-conjugated Abs (FITC, PE, PerCP, APC, PE-Cy7, and APC-Cy7). After staining, the cells were washed twice with FACS buffer (0.5% BSA in PBS buffer) and suspended in 2% paraformaldehyde for FACS analysis. Data were collected by using a FACSCanto II cell analyzer (BD Biosciences), and the collected data were analyzed by the FCS Express software (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA). Cells gated on CD11c+ and CD11b+ were defined as Flt-3L induced BM-derived myeloid DCs (mDCs).

ELISA

The concentration of cytokines in cell culture supernatant was measured by using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. For this purpose, the OptEIATM mouse IL-12 (p40) ELISA kit was purchased from BD Pharmingen, and the mouse TNF-α and mouse IL-4 Ready-SET-GO kits were purchased from eBioscience.

Lignin Analysis by Thioacidolysis

Monolignol analysis by thioacidolysis was performed according to a method described previously (28). The resulting products were trimethylsilylated and then identified by GC/MS (GCMS-QP2010, SHIMADZU Corp. (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Rtx-1 column (RESTEK, Bellefonte, PA) and were quantified from the total ion chromatogram.

Composition of Monosaccharides in Lignin Samples

Neutral sugar composition of the lignin fractions was determined by acid hydrolysis and the DIONEX ICS-3000 ion chromatography apparatus (Thermo-Fisher Scientific Inc., Yokohama, Japan) using the following conditions: column, CarboPac PA1 (2.0-mm inner diameter × 250 mm); column temperature, 30 °C; developing solution A, water; developing solution B, 100 mm NaOH; developing solution C, 100 mm NaOH + 1 m CH3COONa; programmed flow sequence, 0–45 min with 99.5% A and 0.5% B, 45–55 min with 100% C, 55–65 min with 100% B, 65–85 min with 99.5% A and 0.5% B; flow rate, 0.3 ml/min.

Ester Bond Cleavage by Mild Alkaline Treatment

Lignin samples were saponified with 1 m NaOH with stirring at room temperature for 1 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h, respectively. Upon completion, each sample was neutralized by adding the same volume of 1 m HCl. Neutralized lignin solutions were diluted with PBS and used in experiments for evaluating their immunostimulatory activities. As a positive control, we used alkali-untreated LREL.

Gel Permeation Chromatography

Average molecular weights of the lignin fractions were determined by gel permeation chromatography on SHIMADZU HPLC system equipped with SPD-20A detector and three TSKgel columns (α-6000, α-4000, and α-2500; Tosoh Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Lignin fractions, following dissolution in 10 mm LiCl/DMF for 2 days, were injected into the HPLC system. The columns were operated at 40 °C and eluted with 10 mm LiCl/DMF at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. All columns were calibrated using polystyrene standards.

Stimulation of DCs in the Presence of Polymyxin B or Cytochalasin D

BM-derived DCs were induced as described above. To inhibit LPS activation, 5 mg/ml polymyxin B (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) was added to the induced BM-DC culture. After incubation with polymyxin B, LPS (10 ng/ml) or LREL (100 ng/ml) was added to the culture medium. Treated cells were used for FACS analysis, and cell culture supernatants were used for ELISA. LPS was used as a positive control. To inhibit phagocytosis, BM-DCs were pretreated with 2 μm cytochalasin D (Sigma) for 1 h prior to their stimulation by LREL or LPS.

Stimulation of DCs in the Presence of Blocking Antibodies

BM-derived DCs were induced as described above. BM-DCs were preincubated with a blocking antibody directed toward mannose receptor (monoclonal anti-mannose receptor antibody (15-2); 10 μg/ml), a blocking antibody directed toward dectin-1 (monoclonal anti-dectin-1 antibody 2A-11; 20 μg/ml) or an appropriate isotype control antibody for 2 h. LREL was added to the culture medium. Treated cells were then used for FACS analysis, and cell culture supernatants were used for ELISA.

Activation of Transcription Factors by LREL

mDCs from Flt-3L-induced BM-derived DCs were sorted by a FACS Aria cell sorter (BD Biosciences). The purity of sorted mDCs was more than 95%. Purified mDCs were stimulated by LREL or LPS for 3 or 8 h. Nuclear extracts of mDCs were prepared by using NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagent (Pierce) following the manufacturer's instructions. Activated transcription factors (NF-κBp65, AP-1, IRF-3, and IRF-7) were quantified by ELISA using the TransAM transcription factor ELISA kit (ActiveMotif, Carlsbad, CA).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by using the standard Student's t test.

RESULTS

Immunostimulatory Activity of Lignin Fractions

First, we prepared four different lignin fractions, named here as HRML, PML, LREL, and PEL, from barley husk by a slightly modified version of Sun's method (23) as illustrated in Fig. 1. Approximate yields of HRML, PML, LREL, and PEL were 2.5, 6, 0.13, and 3%, respectively. Total lignin contents in HRML, PML, LREL, and PEL, as determined by Klason lignin analysis, were 37.3, 50.8, 55.2, and 62.8%, respectively. The immunostimulatory activity of each one of these lignin fractions on innate immunity was then determined using Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs. We found that only LREL and PEL had immunostimulatory activity (Fig. 2, A and B). We also tested the immune stimulatory abilities of MWL and LCC, both of which are extracted using methods different from the one described here, and found that neither of them could activate BM-DCs (data not shown). Next, to determine the specific stimulatory effect of each lignin, we compared the expression levels of marker proteins MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86 on the cell surface and concentrations of IL-12p40, TNF-α, and IL-4 in the cell culture supernatant after treating independent cultures of BM-DCs either with a 100 ng/ml concentration of one of the lignin fractions or with 10 ng/ml LPS. Strikingly, stimulation with LREL led to large increases in the expression levels of all of the cell surface marker proteins: 10-fold increase in CD40, 4-fold increase in CD80, 10-fold increase in CD86, and 4-fold increase in MHCII (Fig. 3A). Additionally, there were 5- and 20-fold increases in the concentrations of IL-12p40 and TNF-α, respectively, in the culture supernatant (Fig. 3B). IL-4 was not detected from any samples (data not shown). Although stimulation with PEL also led to significant increases in the expression levels of marker proteins on the cell surface and concentrations of cytokines in the culture supernatant, the stimulatory effect of PEL was much weaker than that of the LREL (Fig. 3). In contrast, HRML and PML did not activate the DCs. Therefore, LREL and PEL, both of which were obtained by cellulase and hemicellulase digestion, are immunostimulators. Interestingly, the biological activity of LREL was much higher than that of PEL. Thus, we focused on LREL and PEL for further analysis.

FIGURE 2.
Activation of DCs by lignins. BM-derived DCs were induced with Fit-3L, and the induced cells were treated with various concentrations of lignin fractions. As a positive control, induced cells were treated with 10 ng/ml LPS. After 24 h, treated cells were ...
FIGURE 3.
Comparative analysis of DC activation by lignin fractions. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were treated with a 100 ng/ml concentration of the indicated lignin sample or 10 ng/ml LPS (positive control). After 24 h, expression levels of various cell surface marker ...

Determination of Thioacidolysis Monomeric Reaction Products in LREL and PEL

We next performed thioacidolysis of lignin fractions to further characterize them. Thioacidolysis, an acid-catalyzed reaction that causes depolymerization of lignins (29), proceeds by cleaving only the β-O-4 linkage, which is actually the most frequent type of bond found in lignins. Therefore, thioacidolysis is a useful method for detecting lignins and comparing the relative amounts of monomeric building blocks of lignin, known as G unit, S unit, and H unit (30). We found that the yield of each monomeric building block of lignin found in LREL was about 4 times more than that in PEL (Table 1), and the ratios of S unit content and H unit content to G unit content in LREL and PEL were comparable. Thus, lignin could be extracted from barley husk after successive extraction with dioxane/water and then enzyme (cellulase and hemicellulase) treatment.

TABLE 1
Thioacidolysis monomeric reaction products in LREL and PEL (yield measured by thioacidolysis analysis)

Determination of Neutral Sugars and Uronic Acids in LREL and PEL

Next, we performed solvent acid hydrolysis of LREL and PEL and analyzed the hydrolyzed products by ion chromatography to determine the composition of neutral sugars and uronic acids. As summarized in Table 2, the amounts of neutral sugars and uronic acids in LREL were about 3 times greater than those in PEL, whereas the ratio of each molecule in LREL and PEL was largely similar. Xylose and arabinose were the most and second most neutral sugars, respectively, found in each lignin fraction. Glucose, galactose, and mannose were found at levels comparable with that of arabinose, and each fraction contained only a small amount of uronic acids.

TABLE 2
Neutral sugars and uronic acids (percentage, w/w) in LREL and PEL fractions

Role of Ester Bonds in Immunostimulatory Activity of LREL

It is well known that lignin substances are etherified with hydroxylcinnamic acids and esterified with either polysaccharides or lignins through etherified hydroxycinnamic acids (5,7). To determine whether the ester bonds have any functional importance, DC stimulation experiments were performed using mild alkali-hydrolyzed LREL. As shown in Fig. 4, the immunostimulatory activity of LREL became weaker as the time of alkali treatment got longer, and after more than 3 h of alkali treatment, its immunostimulatory activity was completely lost. Thus, these results suggested that the ester bonds of LREL play an essential role in the immunostimulatory activity of LREL.

FIGURE 4.
Effect of alkaline hydrolysis on LREL activity. LREL was first hydrolyzed by treating with 1 n NaOH for different time periods, and excess alkali was neutralized with 1 n HCl. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were then incubated with the indicated concentrations ...

Evaluation of Molecular Weights of Lignin Fractions

To understand whether there is any relationship between the molecular weight and the biological activity, molecular weight (Mr) of each lignin fraction was determined by gel permeation chromatography. The estimated weight-average molecular weights of LREL and PEL were 70,640 and 23,922, respectively (i.e. both over 20,000). Mr of LREL was 3 times greater than that of PEL. Because the observed biological activity of LREL was more than that of PEL, this result suggested a correlation between the molecular weight and immunostimulatory activity.

Taken together, our results suggested that LREL and PEL were analytically obvious lignin-containing immunostimulators. Because LREL is a better immunostimulator than PEL, we next focused our attention on LREL and examined the immunostimulatory mechanism of LREL.

LREL-induced DC Activation Is Mediated via the TLR4 Signaling Pathway

Pattern recognition receptors play a crucial role in host defense. TLRs, which are members of the pattern recognition receptor family, are essential for recognition of bacteria by DCs. In order to identify the responsible TLR through which LREL activates DCs, the degree of activation was compared using BM-DCs derived from various TLRs/MyD88-deficient mice. As shown in Fig. 5 (A and C), LREL-induced increases in the expression level of CD86 and production of IL-12p40 were completely abrogated in DCs derived from TLR4−/− mice and partially abrogated in DCs derived from MyD88−/− mice but remained unchanged in DCs derived from TLR2−/−, TLR7−/−, and TLR9−/− mice (compared with WT mice). In this experiment, we used LPS as a positive TLR4L control and confirmed that the DCs stimulated with LPS responded in a similar manner as the DCs stimulated with LREL (Figs. 5, B and C). These data suggested that, like LPS, LREL-induced activation of DCs is also mediated via TLR4.

FIGURE 5.
Immunostimulatory activity of LREL is mediated via TLR4. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were prepared from wild-type (WT), TLR2−/−, TLR4−/−, TLR7−/−, TLR9−/−, and MyD88−/− mice. These ...

TLR4 has long been considered as a bacterial sensor based on its specificity for LPS, a characteristic molecule found on the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, it is possible that the observed activation of DCs by LREL via the TLR4 signaling pathway might be due to endotoxin contamination. To exclude this possibility, we performed the following two experiments. In the first experiment, polymyxin B, a polycationic antibiotic, which is known to block many biological effects of LPS by binding to the lipid A portion of the molecule (31), was added to the DC culture during stimulation with LREL. As shown in Fig. 6A, although a slight decrease in CD86 expression was observed upon the addition of polymyxin B, LREL still caused significant and steady activation of BM-DCs. On the other hand, the addition of polymyxin B completely blocked the activation of DCs induced by LPS. In the second experiment, we performed GC/MS analysis of alkali-hydrolyzed LREL and searched for fatty acids, which are one of the major and integral components of LPS. However, we failed to detect any fatty acid molecule in the hydrolysate (data not shown). These results suggested that although the structures of LREL and LPS were completely different, the LREL structure might contain some element that is similar to that of LPS. Therefore, we believe that the observed immunostimulatory activity of LREL was not due to endotoxin contamination but due to a novel TLR4 ligand.

FIGURE 6.
Effect of polymyxin B and cytochalasin D on LREL-induced activation of DCs. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were treated with LPS inhibitor polymyxin B (A) and phagocytosis inhibitor cytochalasin D (B) and then incubated for 24 h with 100 ng/ml LREL (top) or 10 ...

Next, we examined whether there is any relationship between phagocytosis and stimulatory activity of LREL. As shown in Fig. 6B, inhibiting phagocytosis by treating with cytochalasin D had no effect on the LREL-induced responses in DCs, suggesting that the endosomal receptors are not involved in the activation process.

Because polysaccharides are one of the main components of LREL, we next examined whether other plasma membrane receptors, such as mannose receptor and C-type lectin receptor, are involved in activation of DCs by LREL stimulation. To test this possibility, we performed a receptor inhibition assay using blocking antibodies directed toward mannose receptor and dectin-1. As shown in Fig. 7, LREL-induced DC activation was not inhibited by these blocking antibodies, suggesting that neither of them is involved in the activation process.

FIGURE 7.
Effect of pattern recognition receptor-blocking antibodies on LREL-induced activation of DCs. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were treated with the blocking antibody (Ab) directed toward mannose receptor, blocking antibody directed toward dectin-1, or isotype-nonspecific ...

Activation of Intracellular Transcription Factors by LREL

Because TLR stimulation triggers activation and nuclear translocation of transcription factors, some of which are involved in cytokine production (22), we next examined the DNA binding levels of activated NF-κBp65, c-Jun (one of the members of the AP-1 family of molecules), IRF-3, and IRF-7 in the nuclear extracts of DCs stimulated with LREL or LPS. As shown in Fig. 8, when mDCs were stimulated with either LREL or LPS for 3 h, DNA binding levels of activated NF-κBp65 and c-Jun were significantly increased in the nuclear extracts of DCs. The DNA binding level of IRF-3 was also found to be up-regulated (p < 0.1); however, LREL or LPS stimulation did not have any effect on the DNA binding level of IRF-7. On the other hand, the DNA binding level of activated IRF-7 was significantly increased when mDCs were stimulated with LREL or LPS for 8 h (Fig. 8B).

FIGURE 8.
Activation of nuclear transcription factors by LREL. mDCs were sorted from the Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs. Purified mDCs were stimulated by 1 μg/ml LREL or 100 ng/ml LPS (positive control (Ctrl)) for 3 and 8 h. A, DNA binding levels of activated NF-κBp65, ...

Comparison of the Activity of LREL Prepared from Various Plants

We next examined the immunostimulatory activity of LRELs prepared from other grain husks and various tissues of edible plants. For this purpose, we chose rice husk and wheat bran as grain husks, sesame as seeds, cinnamon as barks, green tea as leaves, and turmeric as rhizomes. As before, the activity of LREL was measured by monitoring the expression level of CD86 on the cell surface of DCs and the concentration of IL-12p40 in the cell culture supernatant. Results shown in Fig. 9 (A and B) clearly demonstrated that the LRELs from all plant tissues tested in this study were able to activate DCs in a dose-dependent manner. However, LRELs from different sources activated DCs to different extents. Thus, the LRELs derived from grain husks (barley husk, rice husk, and wheat bran) exhibited strong immunostimulatory activities as compared with the LRELs derived from other plant tissues.

FIGURE 9.
Comparison of stimulatory activities of LRELs isolated from various plants tissues. Flt-3L-induced BM-DCs were treated with various concentrations of indicated LREL samples. Cells treated with 10 ng/ml LPS were used as a positive control (Ctrl). After ...

DISCUSSION

Barley grain is one of the raw materials for the malting and brewing industry, and a large amount of barley husk is produced as a by-product. The present study is the first report demonstrating that an analytically obvious lignin-carbohydrate, extracted from barley husk, is a potent immunostimulator of dendritic cells, and this lignin-carbohydrate acts via TLR4.

It was intriguing that BM-DCs were activated by only LREL and PEL, which were obtained by treating barley husks with cellulase/hemicellulase. Surprisingly, LREL stimulated DCs at a quite low concentration, whereas HRML and PML, both of which were extracted without the cellulase/hemicellulase treatment, could not activate DCs. These results strongly suggested that cellulase/hemicellulase treatment was essential for preparing the immunostimulatory fractions.

Our results also suggested that four important material features were responsible for the high immunostimulatory activities of LREL and PEL. The first important feature was the lignin content. As shown in Table 1, both LREL and PEL were found to contain thioacidolysis monomeric reaction products (G, S, and H units). The ratios of S and H unit contents to G unit in LREL and PEL were comparable. Thus, it was analytically obvious that LREL and PEL contained lignin, and the chemical structures of their lignins were probably similar. In addition, because LREL contained much more monomeric building blocks of lignin than PEL, the lignin content might have some relationship to immunostimulatory activity.

The second important feature was the content and composition of neutral sugars. Although LREL was found to contain more neutral sugars and uronic acids than PEL, the compositions of neutral sugars in LREL and PEL were comparable. Thus, we believe that, just like the lignin, the molecular structure of polysaccharides in LREL was similar to that of PEL, and the higher content of neutral sugars in LREL might be contributing to its higher activity. As reported previously, the major types of dietary fiber present in the barley husk were β-glucan and arabinoxylan (32, 33). Thus, barley husk contained mainly xylose, arabinose, and glucose and only minor amounts of galactose, mannose, and uronic acids. Characteristically, LREL and PEL were rich not only in xylose and arabinose but also in galactose and mannose. The galactose and mannose residues could have originated from the presence of arabinogalactan and glucomannan (34, 35). As reported previously, arabinogalactan from larch woods showed immunostimulatory activity both in vitro and in vivo (36, 37). Furthermore, Leung et al. (38) demonstrated that the immunopotency of aloe polysaccharides increased as their mannose content increased. Taken together, these results suggested that the enrichment of galactose and mannose residues in LREL and PEL might be important for their immunostimulatory activity.

The third important feature was the presence of ester bonds. Hydroxycinnamic acids are covalently linked to lignin by ester and ether bonds and to polysaccharides mainly by ester bonds (5,7). The ester bonds in LCCs are known to be cleaved by mild alkali treatment (39). As described above, we found that mild alkali-treated LREL could not stimulate DCs. Thus, our results suggested that the ester bonds between lignin and polysaccharides play an important role in the immunostimulatory activity.

The last important feature was the molecular weight. The molecular weights of lignin monomeric units and neutral sugars are approximately between 150 and 200. Therefore, considering the observed high Mr of LREL and PEL, they may be regarded as highly polymerized biopolymers, the so-called “lignin-carbohydrates.” Because the Mr of LREL was much higher than that of PEL, our results suggested a correlation between the activity and Mr. Thus, for the immunostimulatory activity, it is important that the lignin-containing substances contain neutral sugars (especially enriched with galactose and mannose) and ester bonds (linking the lignin molecule to polysaccharides), and it might be also important that the lignin units and neutral sugars are highly polymerized. As described above, MWL and LCC from beech could not activate DCs. MWL is known to be widely used for the structural studies of lignin and to contain mainly lignin and a few carbohydrates (40). In general, LCC is obtained by extracting the solid residue that remained after the extraction of MWL and harbors chemical linkages (such as ester, ether, and glucoside linkages) between the lignin and polysaccharides (41). Thus, the results on the activities of MWL and LCC suggested that only lignin-carbohydrates, extracted by a specific method, such as cellulase/hemicellulase treatment, could stimulate DCs.

Interestingly, LRELs extracted from barley husk as well from the edible parts of various other plants could stimulate DCs. Thus, potent immunostimulators could be extracted from plant sources by cellulase/hemicellulase treatment. Among these LRELs, the gramineae husk LREL exhibited the strongest activity. Because the amount and composition of lignin units vary among taxa and cell types (3), it is possible that the ratio of monomeric building blocks of lignin may have some relevance to the immunostimulatory potency. By analyzing our results on lignin fractions, we identified four important features that are responsible for the activity. We therefore believe that similar analysis of other LRELs from various plant sources could lead to the identification of additional important activity-related features.

The present study is the first report that demonstrated LREL is a novel ligand for TLR4 by using tlr-deficient mice. It has been shown earlier that TLR4 uses both MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent signaling cascades (19, 20). This may explain why we observed partial abrogation of LREL-induced activation of MyD88−/− DCs. There is also a possibility that not only TLR4 but also other pattern recognition receptors might be involved in mediating the stimulator effect of LREL. We have also excluded the possibility that phagocytosis and endosomal receptors, such as mannose receptor and C-type lectin, were involved in the stimulatory action of LREL. In addition, our results showed that LREL and LPS were different molecules, and our LREL preparation was free from bacterial contamination. We have also shown in Fig. 8 that short term LREL stimulation led to the activation of transcription factors NF-κBp65, c-Jun, and IRF-3, and long term stimulation led to the activation of IRF-7. Activation of these transcription factors was known to be induced by stimulation of TLRs (22). As reported previously, TLR4-mediated IFN-β expression is induced via mainly IRF-3 activation (42, 43). Once the initial activation of IFN genes has occurred, the positive feedback regulation becomes operational, and IRF-7 would be induced by IFN signaling (44). Our observation that short term and long term stimulation by LREL resulted in IRF-3 and IRF-7 activation, respectively, strongly supports the idea noted above. Taken together, we concluded from these results that LREL is a novel TLR4 ligand.

Several previous studies have identified novel TLR4Ls from plants. For example, dioscorin, a glycoprotein isolated from Dioscorea alata, was reported to activate macrophages via TLR4 (45). AILb-A, a 55-kDa protein isolated from Aeginetia indica L., was reported to induce anti-tumor immunity via TLR4 (46). These TLR4Ls might be useful as anti-tumor reagents and vaccine adjuvants. However, because these TLR4Ls normally contained proteins, their activities might be lost when they are orally administrated. In this paper, we successfully identified a lignin-carbohydrate as a novel TLR4L. Because lignins hardly get digested in the digestive tract (47), we believe that LREL might be a strong candidate as an oral immunostimulatory reagent.

There are several recent reports describing the physiological activities of lignins. For example, Sakagami et al. (9, 10) investigated the biological activities of lignin-carbohydrate complexes, obtained from the pine cones of Pinus parviflora Sieb et Zucc by extracting with hot water and alkali. They showed that the alkali-extracted fraction had various biological activities. Another study from this research group reported that the alkali-extracted fraction from pine cone contained a lignin-like polyphenolic skeleton and polysaccharides (48). In addition, the alkali-extracted fraction from Lentinus edodes mycelia was shown to induce macrophage activation via dectin-2 (49) but not via TLR4 (50). Because the alkali-extracted fraction from L. edodes mycelia was found to contain lignin structure (51), lignin was believed to be required for the activity. These authors claimed that their lignin-carbohydrate complexes were not related to LPS because they did not act via the TLR4 signaling pathway (52). The following results strongly suggested that their “lignin-carbohydrate complexes” are totally different from LREL, because (i) the activity of LREL was found to be mediated via TLR4 signaling pathway, and (ii) the activity of LREL was completely diminished by mild alkaline treatment.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that the cellulase-treated lignin-carbohydrate, called LREL, is a novel TLR4 ligand. We suggest that LREL could be used as an antibacterial, anticancer reagent and also as a vaccine adjuvant. It is also well known that cellulolytic bacteria are present among the ruminant rumen bacteria (53,55). Thus, barley husk, which is a by-product of the malting and brewing industry, could be utilized as an immunostimulatory feed for the ruminant without any cellulase treatment or any extraction step. We are currently exploring this possibility.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kenta Jounai, Dr. Yasuhisa Ano, Makiko Neyazaki, Konomi Ohshio, and Kumiko Ikado for technical assistance and also for valuable discussion.

Footnotes

3The abbreviations used are:

G
guaiacyl
S
syringyl
H
p-hydroxyphenyl
HRML
hemicellulose-rich milled lignin
PML
pure milled lignin
LREL
lignin-rich enzyme lignin
PEL
pure enzyme lignin
BM
bone marrow
DC
dendritic cell
BM-DC
BM-derived DC
mDC
myeloid DC
TLR
Toll-like receptor
TLR4L
TLR4 ligand
MWL
milled wood lignin
LCC
lignin-carbohydrate complex.

REFERENCES

1. Davin L. B., Wang H. B., Crowell A. L., Bedgar D. L., Martin D. M., Sarkanen S., Lewis N. G. (1997) Stereoselective bimolecular phenoxy radical coupling by an auxiliary (dirigent) protein without an active center. Science 275, 362–366 [PubMed]
2. Reale S., Di Tullio A., Spreti N., De Angelis F. (2004) Mass spectrometry in the biosynthetic and structural investigation of lignins. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 23, 87–126 [PubMed]
3. Campbell M. M., Sederoff R. R. (1996) Variation in lignin content and composition (mechanisms of control and implications for the genetic improvement of plants). Plant Physiol. 110, 3–13 [PubMed]
4. Bauchera M., Montiesb B., Montagua M. V., Boerjana W. (2010) Biosynthesis and genetic engineering of lignin. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 17, 125–197
5. Iiyama K., Tuyet T. B., Bruce L., Stone A. (1990) Phenolic acid bridges between polysaccharides and lignin in wheat internodes. Phytochemistry 10.1016/0031-9422(90)80009-6 [Cross Ref]
6. Hernanz D., Nuñez V., Sancho A. I., Faulds C. B., Williamson G., Bartolomé B., Gómez-Cordovés C. (2001) Hydroxycinnamic acids and ferulic acid dehydrodimers in barley and processed barley. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 4884–4888 [PubMed]
7. Sun R. C., Sun X. F., Wang S. Q., Zhu W., Wang X. Y. (2002) Ester and ether linkages between hydroxycinnamic acids and lignins from wheat, rice, rye, and barley straws, maize stems, and fast-growing poplar wood. Indust. Crops Product 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00112-1 [Cross Ref]
8. Suzuki H., Iiyama K., Yoshida O., Yamazaki S., Yamamoto N., Toda S. (1990) Structural characterization of the immunoactive and antiviral water-solubilized lignin in an extract of the culture medium of Lentinus edodes mycelia (LEM). Agric. Biol. Chem. 54, 479–487 [PubMed]
9. Sakagami H., Hashimoto K., Suzuki F., Ogiwara T., Satoh K., Ito H., Hatano T., Takashi Y., Fujisawa S. (2005) Molecular requirements of lignin-carbohydrate complexes for expression of unique biological activities. Phytochemistry 66, 2108–2120 [PubMed]
10. Sakagami H., Kushida T., Oizumi T., Nakashima H., Makino T. (2010) Distribution of lignin-carbohydrate complex in plant kingdom and its functionality as alternative medicine. Pharmacol. Ther. 128, 91–105 [PubMed]
11. Olkku J., Slmenkallio-Marttila M., Sweins H., Home S. (2005) Connection between structure and quality of barley husk. J. Am. Soc. Brewing Chem. 10.1094/ASBCJ-63-0017 [Cross Ref]
12. Banchereau J., Steinman R. M. (1998) Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245–252 [PubMed]
13. Villadangos J. A., Schnorrer P. (2007) Intrinsic and cooperative antigen-presenting functions of dendritic-cell subsets in vivo. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 543–555 [PubMed]
14. Whitmire J. K. (2011) Induction and function of virus-specific CD4+ T cell responses. Virology 411, 216–228 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Pulendran B., Tang H., Manicassamy S. (2010) Programming dendritic cells to induce T(H)2 and tolerogenic responses. Nat. Immunol. 11, 647–655 [PubMed]
16. Aderem A., Ulevitch R. J. (2000) Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response. Nature 406, 782–787 [PubMed]
17. Rock F. L., Hardiman G., Timans J. C., Kastelein R. A., Bazan J. F. (1998) A family of human receptors structurally related to Drosophila Toll. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 588–593 [PubMed]
18. Kawai T., Akira S. (2010) The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 11, 373–384 [PubMed]
19. Takeda K., Kaisho T., Akira S. (2003) Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 335–376 [PubMed]
20. Trinchieri G., Sher A. (2007) Cooperation of Toll-like receptor signals in innate immune defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 179–190 [PubMed]
21. Honda K., Taniguchi T. (2006) IRFs: master regulators of signaling by Toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 644–658 [PubMed]
22. Zhong B., Tien P., Shu H.-B. (2006) Innate immune responses: crosstalk of signaling and regulation of gene transcription. Virology 352, 14–21 [PubMed]
23. Sun R., Mott L., Bolton J. (1998) Isolation and fractional characterization of ball-milled and enzyme lignins from oil palm trunk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 718–723 [PubMed]
24. Kishimoto T., Chiba W., Saito K., Fukushima K., Uraki Y., Ubukata M. (2010) Influence of syringyl to guaiacyl ratio on the structure of natural and synthetic lignins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 895–901 [PubMed]
25. Björkman A. (1956) Studies on finely divided wood. Part 1. Extraction of lignin with neutral solvents. Svensk Papperstidning, 59, 477–485
26. Björkman A. (1957) Studies on finely divided wood. Part 3. Extraction of lignin-carbohydrate complexes with neutral solvents. Svensk Papperstidning 60, 243–251
27. Fujiwara D., Wei B., Presley L. L., Brewer S., McPherson M., Lewinski M. A., Borneman J., Braun J. (2008) Systemic control of plasmacytoid dendritic cells by CD8+ T cells and commensal microbiota. J. Immunol. 180, 5843–5852 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Saito K., Watanabe Y., Shirakawa M., Matsushita Y., Imai T., Koike T., Sano Y., Funada R., Fukazawa K., Fukushima K. (2012) Direct mapping of morphological distribution of syringyl and guaiacyl lignin in the xylem of maple by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Plant J. 69, 542–552 [PubMed]
29. Rolando C., Monties B., Lapierre C. (1992) in Methods in Lignin Chemistry (Lin S. Y., Dence C. W., editors. , eds) pp. 334–349, Springer, Berlin
30. Yue F., Lu F., Sun R. C., Ralph J. (2012) Syntheses of lignin-derived thioacidolysis monomers and their uses as quantitation standards. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 922–928 [PubMed]
31. Srimal S., Surolia N., Balasubramanian S., Surolia A. (1996) Titration calorimetric studies to elucidate the specificity of the interactions of polymyxin B with lipopolysaccharides and lipid A. Biochem. J. 315, 679–686 [PubMed]
32. Oscarsson M., Andersson R., Salomonsson A.-C., Åman P. (1996) Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fibre components. J. Cereal Sci. 10.1006/jcrs.1996.0049 [Cross Ref]
33. Pitkänen L., Tuomainen P., Virkki L., Aseyev V., Tenkanen M. (2008) Structural comparison of arabinoxylans from two barley side-stream fractions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 5069–5077 [PubMed]
34. Fincher G. B. (1975) Morphology and chemical composition of barley endosperm cell walls. J. Inst. Brewing 81, 116–122
35. Bacic A., Stone B. A. (1981) Chemistry and organization of aleurone cell wall components from wheat and barley. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8, 475–495
36. Kelly G. S. (1999) Larch arabinogalactan: clinical relevance of a novel immune-enhancing polysaccharide. Altern. Med. Rev. 4, 96–103 [PubMed]
37. Choi E. M., Kim A. J., Kim Y. O., Hwang J. K. (2005) Immunomodulating activity of arabinogalactan and fucoidan in vitro. J. Med. Food 8, 446–453 [PubMed]
38. Leung M. Y., Liu C., Zhu L. F., Hui Y. Z., Yu B., Fung K. P. (2004) Chemical and biological characterization of a polysaccharide biological response modifier from Aloe vera L. var. chinensis (Haw.) Berg. Glycobiology 14, 501–510 [PubMed]
39. Sun R. C., Sun X. F., Zhang S. H. (2001) Quantitative determination of hydroxycinnamic acids in wheat, rice, rye, and barley straws, maize stems, oil palm frond fiber, and fast-growing poplar wood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 5122–5129 [PubMed]
40. Lundquist K. (1992) in Methods in Lignin Chemistry (Lin S. Y., Dence C. W., editors. , eds) pp. 65–70, Springer, Berlin
41. Helm R. F. (1999) in Lignin: Historical, Biological, and Materials Perspectives (Glasser W. G., Northey R. A., Schultz T. P., editors. , eds) pp. 161–171, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.
42. Sakaguchi S., Negishi H., Asagiri M., Nakajima C., Mizutani T., Takaoka A., Honda K., Taniguchi T. (2003) Essential role of IRF-3 in lipopolysaccharide-induced interferon-β gene expression and endotoxin shock. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306, 860–866 [PubMed]
43. Honda K., Yanai H., Negishi H., Asagiri M., Sato M., Mizutani T., Shimada N., Ohba Y., Takaoka A., Yoshida N., Taniguchi T. (2005) IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature 434, 772–777 [PubMed]
44. Honda K., Yanai H., Takaoka A., Taniguchi T. (2005) Regulation of the type I IFN induction: a current view. Int. Immunol. 17, 1367–1378 [PubMed]
45. Fu S. L., Hsu Y. H., Lee P. Y., Hou W. C., Hung L. C., Lin C. H., Chen C. M., Huang Y. J. (2006) Dioscorin isolated from Dioscorea alata activates TLR4-signaling pathways and induces cytokine expression in macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 339, 137–144 [PubMed]
46. Okamoto M., Oh-E G., Oshikawa T., Furuichi S., Tano T., Ahmed S. U., Akashi S., Miyake K., Takeuchi O., Akira S., Himeno K., Sato M., Ohkubo S. (2004) Toll-like receptor 4 mediates the antitumor host response induced by a 55-kilodalton protein isolated from Aeginetia indica L., a parasitic plant. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 11, 483–495 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Vailhé M. A., Provan G. J., Scobbie L., Chesson A., Maillot M. P., Cornu A., Besle J. M. (2000) Effect of phenolic structures on the degradability of cell walls isolated from newly extended apical internode of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 618–623 [PubMed]
48. Sakagami H., Oh-Hara T., Kaiya T., Kawazoe Y., Nonoyama M., Konno K. (1989) Molecular species of the antitumor and antiviral fraction from pine cone extract. Anticancer Res. 9, 1593–1598 [PubMed]
49. Kushida T., Makino T., Tomomura M., Tomomura A., Sakagami H. (2011) Enhancement of Dectin-2 gene expression by lignin-carbohydrate complex from Lentinus edodes mycelia extract (LEM) in a mouse macrophage-like cell line. Anticancer Res. 31, 1241–1248 [PubMed]
50. Kawano M., Thet M. M., Makino T., Kushida T., Sakagami H. (2010) DNA microarray analysis of signaling pathway in macrophages stimulated by lignin-carbohydrate complex from Lentinus edodes mycelia (LEM) extract. Anticancer Res. 30, 2567–2576 [PubMed]
51. Kawano M., Sakagami H., Satoh K., Shioda S., Kanamoto T., Terakubu S., Nakashima H., Makino T. (2010) Lignin-like activity of Lentinus edodes mycelia extract (LEM). In Vivo 24, 543–551 [PubMed]
52. Sakagami H., Kushida T., Makino T., Hatano T., Shirataki Y., Matsuta T., Matsuo Y., Mimaki Y. (2012) in A Compendium of Essays on Alternative Therapy (Bhattacharya A., editor. , ed) InTech, Rijeka, Croatia: 10.5772/30449 [Cross Ref]
53. Miron J., Ben-Ghedalia D., Morrison M. (2001) Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1294–1309 [PubMed]
54. Wilson D. B. (2011) Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 259–263 [PubMed]
55. Russell J. B., Muck R. E., Weimer P. J. (2009) Quantitative analysis of cellulose degradation and growth of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 67, 183–197 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology