The etiologic agents of RA remain to be identified. However, in spite of the inability to isolate a specific infectious organism from the joints of RA patients, there is evidence suggesting that transient exposure to indigenous bacterial products may provoke an initial response that could eventually perpetuate and amplify itself. This notion has been supported by numerous animal studies. Single intraperitoneal injection of crude bacterial cell walls or water-soluble PG-PS from Gram-positive bacteria into susceptible strains of rats induces polyarthritis that closely resembles human RA. The joint lesions have a biphasic course with an initial acute inflammation of the ankle, wrist, and small joints of extremities, followed by chronic erosive arthritis (for review [
6]). The initial, acute, phase has features of the innate immune response in that inflammation is driven by neutrophils and macrophages and is T-cell independent. The chronic stage of arthritis is T-cell dependent and thus has features of the adaptive immune response [
7,
29]. Systemic administration of Gram-positive bacterial cell walls or PG-PS in susceptible strains of mice also produces arthritis, although, for unknown reasons, mice develop only the acute phase [
22,
30]. The minimal essential arthritogenic structures have been identified as PG-PS, the major structural components of Gram-positive bacterial cell walls [
31]. The peptidoglycan moiety is responsible for the pathogenicity of PG-PS, because enzymatic digestion of the peptidoglycan moiety eliminates the proinflammatory and arthritopathogenic properties of PG-PS [
32]. The peptidoglycan can substitute for PG-PS in the induction of the acute [
22] but not chronic phase of arthritis [
2,
33]; it has been proposed that the polysaccharide moiety protects the peptidoglycan moiety from degradation
in vivo, thereby facilitating chronic persistence of PG-PS in the host [
2].
The primary events and the identity of cellular receptors that mediate the innate immune response to and the arthritogenic properties of peptidoglycan and PG-PS are incompletely characterized. There is substantial evidence that the transmembrane signal leading to cell activation in response to stimulation with Gram-positive peptidoglycans is triggered by TLR-2 [
11]. CD14, has been proposed as an intermediate, connecting peptidoglycan with TLR-2-induced cell activation, but the role of CD14 is controversial. On the one hand, neutralizing antibody to CD14 prevented peptidoglycan-induced cell activation, and transfection of CD14-negative cells with exogenous CD14 conferred responsiveness to peptidoglycan [
14], suggesting that CD14 plays an essential role. On the other hand, peptidoglycan was shown to bind TLR-2 directly [
17] and to induce the activation of TLR-2-transfected cells regardless of CD14, although CD14 increased the affinity of PG–TLR-2 interactions [
17] and potentiated cell activation [
18], suggesting a facultative role for CD14. It is possible that the discrepancies between the studies can be attributed to differences in experimental conditions. In this regard, using primary cells with genetically inactivated CD14 allowed for clearer interpretation. We demonstrate that, in CD14 knockout macrophages, each step of PG-PS induced signal transduction, including the transient increase in [Ca
2+]
i, nuclear translocation of NF-κB, and secretion of TNF-α and IL-6, were almost completely suppressed. Thus, our data strongly support an essential role for CD14 in the innate immune responses to PG-PS.
To examine the role for CD14 in PG-PS induced arthropathy, CD14 knockout mice were backcrossed to a susceptible BALB/c genetic background [
22]. Because mice do not develop chronic arthritis, we were restricted to examination of acute arthritis, which is driven by the innate immune response to PG-PS. The CD14 knockout mice developed arthritis significantly less frequently (68% versus 100% in wild-type group), and the severity of arthritis was significantly reduced (average arthritis score of 2.5 versus 4.8 in the wild-type group). The gross observation data largely correlated with morphologic assessments, the most pronounced difference being in the degree of infiltration of inflammatory cells. Because CD14 knockout macrophages were largely unresponsive to PG-PS stimulation, these
in vivo results were not unexpected. It was rather surprising to find that PG-PS was able to induce arthritis in a significant proportion of CD14 knockout mice. The reason for that is not clear. Our analysis of mRNA expression has shown that inflammatory gene expression in arthritic joints of CD14 knockout mice was strongly inhibited but not abolished (Fig. ). It is possible that resident nonphagocytic cells within joints can be activated by PG-PS via CD14-independent mechanisms. In this regard, Kyburz and coworkers [
34] showed that stimulation of synovial fibroblasts with staphylococcal peptidoglycan caused cell activation and elevated expression of matrix metalloproteinases and cytokines IL-6 and IL-8; it appeared that cell activation was mediated by both TLR-2-dependent and -independent pathways. It is not known whether CD14 is the major receptor for PG-PS in each cell type; alternative receptors have been proposed, including the peptidoglycan recognition proteins and nucleotide-binding oligomerization proteins (NODs) [
35-
37]. Nonetheless, our data indicate that CD14 is an essential receptor for activation of the innate immune response in macrophages by the arthritiogenic PG-PS, and that CD14-dependent mechanisms significantly contribute to PG-PS-induced arthropathy.