PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2014 April 25; 289(17): 11650–11655.
Published online 2014 March 14. doi:  10.1074/jbc.C114.552802
PMCID: PMC4002075

Uncoupling of Ionic Currents from Substrate Transport in the Plant Ammonium Transporter AtAMT1;2*

Abstract

The ammonium flux across prokaryotic, plant, and animal membranes is regulated by structurally related ammonium transporters (AMT) and/or related Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins. Several plant AMT homologs, such as AtAMT1;2 from Arabidopsis, elicit ionic, ammonium-dependent currents when expressed in oocytes. By contrast, functional evidence for the transport of NH3 and the lack of coupled ionic currents has been provided for many Rh proteins. Furthermore, despite high resolution structures the transported substrate in many bacterial homologs, such as AmtB from Escherichia coli, is still unclear. In a heterologous genetic screen in yeast, AtAMT1;2 mutants with reduced transport activity were identified based on the resistance of yeast to the toxic transport analog methylamine. When expressed in oocytes, the reduced transport capacity was confirmed for either of the mutants Q67K, M72I,and W145S. Structural alignments suggest that these mutations were dispersed at subunit contact sites of trimeric AMTs, without direct contact to the pore lumen. Surprisingly, and in contrast to the wild type AtAMT1;2 transporter, ionic currents were not associated with the substrate transport in these mutants. Whether these data suggest that the wild type AtAMT1;2 functions as H+/NH3 co-transporter, as well as how the strict substrate coupling with protons is lost by the mutations, is discussed.

Keywords: Ammonia, Electrophysiology, Membrane Transport, Plant, Proton Transport

Introduction

Ammonium (this term designates the sum of NH4+ and NH3) is an important nutrient and ubiquitous intermediate in nitrogen metabolism. Some passive leakage of NH3 across lipid membranes may occur, but most cells regulate the ammonium permeability by the expression of AMT/Rh2 transporters (1, 2). In microorganisms and plants, the AMT/Rh-mediated high affinity ammonium transport is critical at low concentrations to provide sufficient nitrogen for growth (3, 4). At acidic pH, the NH4+ ion is by orders of magnitude more abundant than NH3, with an equilibrium constant of pKa = 9.25.

The high-resolution crystal structures of AmtB form Escherichia coli, AMT-1 from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and Rh-1 from Nitrosomonas europaea show that these proteins share a highly similar overall (homo-)trimeric structure (5,8). Each subunit forms a hydrophobic pore in its center that is aligned by two pore-facing conserved histidines, which are essential for excluding other cations, such as K+ (9). The pore is occluded to different levels by a “gate” that is formed by two conserved phenylalanines facing into the pore. Although functional assays with liposomes initially supported a facilitated diffusion mechanism for NH3 in EcAmtB (5), these results could not be confirmed by others (10). Heterologous expression of EcAmtB in oocytes is in agreement with a net NH3 transport mechanism (11), but NH4+ transport was proposed based on the capacity of an EcAmtB mutant to accumulate ammonium in cells (12). The structure of EcAmtB strongly suggests that an aromatic NH4+ recruitment site selects against water and other cations at the external pore entrance of each subunit. Structural, computational, and mutational analysis revealed that the ion is likely deprotonated before NH3 passes the pore (5, 6, 13). Simulations may suggest that NH4+ in the pore lumen is deprotonated close to the more externally situated pore histidine and that NH3 diffuses some distance in the pore lumen (14). In EcAmtB, the proton likely associates with water molecules that fill up the pore and might then be transported in a stoichiometric manner. However, the NH4+ recruitment site, the transient deprotonation acceptor, the NH3 conduction mechanism, and the H+ acceptor are disputed (15,19). After the pore transfer and exit into a cytosolic compartment with nearly neutral pH, NH3 is finally reprotonated at the cytoplasmic pore exit.

By contrast to the uncertain functional mechanism in EcAmtB, direct electrogenic transport and membrane potential-driven accumulation of ionic NH4+ and methylammonium (MeA+) have been measured for several plant AMTs (20, 21). The substrate/charge coupling of 1:1 was determined for AMTs from tomato and wheat, respectively. These data are compatible with an NH4+ uniport or an NH3/H+ co-transport mechanism, but cannot distinguish between these mechanisms (22, 23). By contrast, an NH4+/H+ co-transport mechanism has been suggested for a bean homolog, based on reversal potential measurements (24). On the other hand, two plant AMTs from the AMT2 sub-branch (25, 26) did not show electrogenic transport in oocytes and were concluded to transport only the uncharged substrate. Structural models of these functionally different plant AMTs were not helpful to understand different transport mechanisms (25).

In this study, plant ammonium transporter mutants with reduced transport capacity were identified. AtAMT1;2 from the plant Arabidopsis was chosen as the model because this protein generated very large ammonium uptake rates and NH4+-dependent currents in oocytes (20). These large currents allowed a clear distinction from putative endogenous background currents in oocytes. In an attempt to characterize these mutants further, it was identified that these mutants, despite retaining residual transport capacity, lacked (or had minimal) electrogenic ammonium transport currents. The positions of the mutations are surprisingly not found in the pore lumen, but rather on subunit contact sites within the trimer. The data are discussed in light of the proposed transport mechanisms for AMTs.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Yeast Transformation and Growth

The constructs involving AtAMT1;2 (At1g64780) were based on earlier constructs (20). Mutations were verified by full-length sequencing. The plasmids were heat shock-transformed in the ura wild type (23344c) and ura ammonium transporter-defective yeast strains (31019b; triple-Δmep) (3). Selection for transformed yeast was done on solid arginine medium (2% agar, 0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate (YNB) without amino acids and ammonium sulfate (Difco), supplemented with 3% glucose and 0.1% Arg as nitrogen source, buffered with 20 mm MES/Tris, pH 6.1). Yeast was grown in liquid Arg medium until A595 (optical density at 595 nm) reached 0.6–0.8. Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in water to a final A595 of 2. 10 μl of cells with an A595 of 2 (and stepwise 5-fold dilutions) were spotted on Arg medium with or without MeA (pH 6.0), or medium containing no Arg, but NH4Cl as sole nitrogen source, as well as 10 mm MgCl2 and 100 mm KCl.

Yeast Uptake

Yeast was grown in liquid arginine medium until the A595 reached 0.6–0.8. Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in uptake buffer (50 mm potassium phosphate buffer supplemented with 0.6 m sorbitol, pH 6) to a final A595 of 5. Before the uptake, cells were energized by adding 10 μl of 1 m glucose to 100 μl of cells with an A595 of 5 and incubated for 7 min at 30 °C. As controls, uptakes were also done with nonenergized cells (by adding 10 μl of uptake buffer and incubation), which gave qualitatively the same results. The uptake was started by adding 110 μl of uptake buffer containing [14C]MeA (2.11 Gbq/mmol, Amersham Biosciences). 50-μl samples were taken after 30, 60, 120, and 300 s and washed in 4 ml of ice-cold washing solution (uptake buffer containing a 100-fold excess of unlabeled MeA). Immediately after taking the sample, the solution was filtered through glass fiber filters (GF/C, Whatman). The filters containing the yeast were washed three times with 4 ml of ice-cold washing solution and measured by a liquid scintillation counter.

Mutant Screen

The ammonium transporter-defective triple-Δmep strain and wild type yeast were transformed with the plasmid encoding AtAMT1;2. The cells were plated on arginine medium containing 100 or 250 mm MeA. After plasmid rescue from more than 80 separate colonies, the plasmids were reintroduced into the triple-Δmep and the wild type strains. Growth was then assayed on 1 mm ammonium (triple-Δmep) and 100 mm MeA plus 0.1% arginine (wild type yeast) for each plasmid and compared with controls (NeRh-1, AtAMT1;2, and empty pDR plasmid). The full-length AtAMT1;2 sequence of the reisolated plasmids was sequenced.

Electrophysiological Measurements, Preparation, and Injection of Oocytes

Briefly, oocytes were taken from adult females, dissected by collagenase treatment (2 μg/ml, 1.5 h), and injected with 50 nl of linearized cRNA (1 ng/nl) of mutants or wild type AtAMT1;2 as described (22). Oocytes were kept in ND96 for 3 days at 16 °C and then placed in a small recording chamber containing the recording solution (in mm): 110 choline chloride, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 5 MES, pH adjusted to 6.0 with Tris. Ammonium and methylammonium (MeA) were added as chlorine salts. Two-electrode voltage clamp measurements involved 3 m KCl-filled glass capillaries of around 0.8 megohm of resistance. GFP fluorescence pictures were taken with identical settings at a Leica confocal microscope (488-nm argon excitation and 505–530-nm emission filter). The total fluorescence was quantified in a monochromator microplate reader (Safire; excitation at 490/12 nm; emission at 528/12 nm) after solubilization (5 oocytes each) in 50 μl of PBS with 0.2% dodecyl maltoside (pelleting for 2 min at 15,000 rpm).

Oocyte 15NH4+ and [14C]MeA Uptake

Injected oocytes were kept for 3 days at 16 °C in ND96. Uptake experiments were performed for 10 min (15NH4+) or 15 min ([14C]MeA) in ND96, buffered at pH 5.5. The uptake was started by placing the oocytes in ND96 containing 0.5 mm 15NH4+ (0.25 mm ammonium-[15N] sulfate 98+ atom % 15N, ISOTEC) or 3 mm [14C]MeA (only 1/10 14C)(2.11 Gbq/mmol, Amersham Biosciences). To stop the uptake, the oocytes were simultaneously transferred in ND96 containing a 100-fold excess of unlabeled NH4+/MeA. The [14C]MeA oocytes were washed for another three times in ND96 containing an 100-fold excess of unlabeled MeA before they were dissolved in scintillation mixture and measured by a liquid scintillation counter. The 15N isotope uptake was quantified after three further washing times of the oocytes in ND96 using the relative isotope ratio. The uptake of control oocytes was subtracted.

Homology Modeling and Display of Plant AMTs

The models were based on the two high-resolution structures of EcAmtB (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: 1U7G) and AfAmt-1 (PDB ID: 2B2H). 42 amino acids of the N terminus and 33 amino acids of the C terminus of the primary sequence of AtAMT1;2 were truncated because no corresponding regions exist in the crystal structures of the templates. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the EXPRESSO module of the T-Coffee suite. Modeling was carried out using MODELLER 9v7.Several homology models were generated for the target sequence, and the most stable model was chosen. Graphical representations were prepared using the software PyMOL.

RESULTS

Identification of AtAMT1;2 Mutants That Improved MeA Resistance of Yeast

The expression of plant AMT1s, such as AtAMT1;2, increases the yeast susceptibility to MeA due to increased uptake of this cytotoxic compound (28). We noted that occasionally AtAMT1;2-transformed yeast formed colonies of variable size even on nonpermissive MeA concentrations. This resistance was likely due to spontaneous mutations in the high copy number plasmid carrying AtAMT1;2, potentially leading to an abolished or reduced MeA+ import, improved compartmentation, or even efflux of MeA. The plasmids from initially more than 80 isolated colonies were isolated and reintroduced into the triple-Δmep yeast strain that lacks endogenous ammonium transporters. Most plasmids did not support yeast growth on 1 mm ammonium. The sequencing of a few of these revealed that mutations in the coding sequence of AtAMT1;2 introduced premature STOP codons, in accordance with loss-of-function mutations. Thus, in the original colonies, the lack of functional AMT led to a similar MeA sensitivity as had wild type yeast transfected with an empty plasmid.

However, a few plasmids that provided weak susceptibility to methylamine efficiently promoted the growth of the triple-Δmep strain on ammonium (1 mm NH4+, Fig. 1). In these, point mutations occurred that resulted in exchanges of residues in the translated protein sequence, namely Q67K, M72I, W145S, V179L, and G291S. Two other mutants (G357V and L399R, isolated in duplicate) improved the growth of the wild type yeast on MeA above the level of the empty plasmid transformed controls. However, these plasmids failed to support the growth of the triple-Δmep strain on low ammonium (Fig. 1A). These latter two mutations and the two mutations V179L and G291S occurred in residues that were conserved among most AMT/Rh proteins, but the three other mutations (Q67K, M72I, and W145S) were confined to stretches that were exclusively conserved among plant AMT1 sequences, but not in AmtB, AtAMT2, and Rh sequences. These three mutants were chosen for further analysis. Their reduced ammonium transport capacity as compared with AtAMT1;2 wild type was further supported by their differential effects on yeast growth at high ammonium concentrations in yeast (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
Mutants with reduced transport activity provide various levels of resistance to MeA. A, growth of wild type yeast expressing AMT mutants on nonselective conditions (2 mm arginine, left) or MeA (80 mm, middle). Right, growth of triple-Δmep yeast ...

Position of Mutant Residues at Subunit Contact Sites

The reduced transport activity in the mutants may be a consequence of altered pore properties or altered protein stability in the membrane or rigidity. Structural modeling clearly indicated that the altered residues were likely not in direct contact with the hydrophobic pore lumen (and thus likely not in direct contact with the substrate) (Fig. 1B). By contrast, these residues clustered at opposite surfaces between adjacent subunits and may therefore be important for subunit interactions within the functional trimers. Subunit interactions indeed appear to be crucial for the transport activity (29).

MeA and Ammonium Substrate Transport without Ionic Currents in AtAMT1;2 Mutants

AtAMT1;2 and the mutants were expressed in parallel as GFP-tagged proteins in oocytes. The fluorescence pattern at the rim of the oocytes was similar for all constructs and distinct from that of free GFP; this may indicate their plasma membrane localization, but identified different protein expression levels. The Q67K and W145S mutants expressed to high levels in oocytes, whereas a reduced protein level was detected for the M72I mutant (Fig. 2A). As all mutants increased [14C]methylamine uptake into oocytes, the mutant proteins must be inserted into the plasma membranes. However, the uptake activity of all mutants was significantly decreased by about ~70% of the wild type (Fig. 2B), which was consistent with the data from yeast (data not shown). This 30% of residual transport activity was expected to elicit about 30% of the ionic currents that were recorded from the AMT1;2 wild type upon the addition of MeA+. Surprisingly, no measurable residual MeA-associated currents above background were observed (Fig. 2, C and D), but it should be noted that the expected MeA+-induced ionic currents were relatively small, even in the AMT1;2-expressing oocytes.

FIGURE 2.
Coupling of substrate transport to ionic currents is defect in AtAMT1;2 mutants. A, fluorescence analysis of the expression level of GFP-tagged AtAMT1;2 and mutants in the plasma membrane of oocytes. Left panel, from left to right: AtAMT1;2, Q67K, M72I, ...

In the absence of MeA or ammonium, AtAMT1;2-expressing oocytes had similar small, almost linear background currents, which were not distinguishable from water-injected control oocytes. This small background leak was also recorded from mutant-expressing oocytes. Thus, in the absence of the substrate, the electrical resistance of expressing and nonexpressing oocytes was highly similar. In the presence of ammonium, however, large time-independent ionic inward currents were recorded in the wild type AtAMT1;2-expressing oocytes (Fig. 2E). Such a large NH4+-induced current was absent in water-injected controls and in mutant-expressing oocytes. When the relative ammonium uptake into AtAMT1;2- and mutant-expressing oocytes was quantified with 15N isotope label, it was found that the uptake activity by AtAMT1;2 mutants was significantly reduced, but readily detectable. These combined data from MeA and ammonium transport studies and parallel electrical recording indicated that the substrate transport in the mutants was not associated with significant electric charge transport, indicating that neither the ammonium ion nor H+ is transported at larger amounts in the mutants.

DISCUSSION

In a screen involving yeast survival on toxic MeA, functional AtAMT1;2 mutants that lowered the susceptibility of yeast to MeA and that were capable of rescuing growth on ammonium were identified. The mutations in the residues Gln-67, Met-72, and Trp-145 were characterized in more detail. The function of these mutants in yeast was consistent with the idea that ammonium and methylamine were transported at a reduced rate or that less AMT transporter protein was expressed at the plasma membrane of yeast.

The more detailed electrophysiological characterization of the mutants in oocytes revealed that the mutants not only had reduced transport activity, but failed to elicit the expected NH4+-dependent ionic currents that were associated with the transport in the AtAMT1;2 wild type. The fluorescence of oocytes expressing GFP-tagged wild type and mutants was similar, potentially indicating the same subcellular localization at the plasma membrane of oocytes, analogous to other diverse plant proteins expressed in oocytes (30, 31). However, the resolution of the confocal pictures of oocyte plasma membrane microvilli may not allow us to clearly distinguish plasma membrane localization from near plasma membrane subcompartments (32). Nevertheless, the fluorescence clearly indicated that at least the Q67K and W145S mutants were expressed at high levels and their functional activity proved their plasma membrane localization. Importantly, ammonium or MeA did not evoke any detectable ionic currents above background in oocytes expressing these three mutants, despite a residual substrate transport activity of 10–30%. These electrically silent transporters were mutated at positions that were in the membrane core of subunits, but not directly lining the pore lumen. The residues Gln-67, Met-72, and Trp-145 were located at the protein surface between monomers, where they are in contact with adjacent subunits. These residues may affect cooperative interactions in the functional trimer, which also involve the C terminus in plant AMTs (20, 29, 34, 35). The structure of the related EcAmtB was unaffected by point mutations (13, 33), which may argue that the overall architecture was not drastically changed by the mutations. Importantly, the residual electroneutral substrate transport in the mutants cannot be explained by simple NH3 diffusion through the mutant pores, as at the used low external pH 6, less than 0.1% of the ammonium is available as NH3, which is not sufficient to account for the observed transport rates. As a consequence, an NH4+ deprotonation step is likely to occur in the mutants.

Structural constraints, simulation studies, and electrophysiological data clearly indicate that NH4+ is recognized in the external pore vestibule of AMTs and that a charged substrate is transported, but it remains unclear whether this is NH4+, or H+ together with NH3. The fact that K+ is transported in EcAmtB mutants, in which the essential pore twin histidine motif was removed (9), is seemingly more compatible with an NH4+ conduction mechanism in the wild type AMT. However, the functional twin histidine motif was shown to be essential for ammonium transport, and the deletion of this motif must alter mutant EcAmtB pore properties, which now also pass other ions, such as an alkali cation. Alternatively, a H+/(uncharged substrate) mechanism may explain the excellent selectivity of AMTs against the transport of alkali cations of similar size and may explain why deprotonable substrates with very different size (NH4+ and MeA+) are transported at various levels. Such an NH4+ deprotonation step is likely occurring in AtAMT1;2 mutants with intact twin histidine motifs. Furthermore, the transport mechanism in a bean AMT homolog is mechanistically equivalent to a 2H+/NH3 co-transport mechanism (24). Larger electric currents elicited in oocytes by the AtAMT1;1 Q57H mutant may be explained by a higher H+/substrate coupling ratio (35). This mutation was in the homologous residue to Gln-67 of AtAMT1;2. This highlights the importance of the respective glutamine in AMTs and opens the possibility that different residues at this position may result in different transport/charge coupling ratios.

In conclusion, further experiments seem to be required to unequivocally answer whether NH4+ or H+/NH3 are transported by individual AMTs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel Straub and Marek Dynowski for help with initial experiments and help with the structural models.

*This work was partially supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

2The abbreviations used are:

AMT
ammonium transporter
Rh
Rhesus
MeA
methylammonium.

REFERENCES

1. Loqué D., von Wirén N. (2004) Regulatory levels for the transport of ammonium in plant roots. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1293–1305 [PubMed]
2. Ludewig U. (2006) Ion transport versus gas conduction: function of AMT/Rh-type proteins. Transfus Clin. Biol. 13, 111–116 [PubMed]
3. Marini A. M., Soussi-Boudekou S., Vissers S., Andre B. (1997) A family of ammonium transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4282–4293 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Yuan L., Loqué D., Kojima S., Rauch S., Ishiyama K., Inoue E., Takahashi H., von Wirén N. (2007) The organization of high-affinity ammonium uptake in Arabidopsis roots depends on the spatial arrangement and biochemical properties of AMT1-type transporters. Plant Cell 19, 2636–2652 [PubMed]
5. Khademi S., O'Connell J., 3rd, Remis J., Robles-Colmenares Y., Miercke L. J., Stroud R. M. (2004) Mechanism of ammonia transport by Amt/MEP/Rh: structure of AmtB at 1.35 Å. Science 305, 1587–1594 [PubMed]
6. Zheng L., Kostrewa D., Bernèche S., Winkler F. K., Li X. D. (2004) The mechanism of ammonia transport based on the crystal structure of AmtB of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17090–17095 [PubMed]
7. Lupo D., Li X. D., Durand A., Tomizaki T., Cherif-Zahar B., Matassi G., Merrick M., Winkler F. K. (2007) The 1.3-Å resolution structure of Nitrosomonas europaea Rh50 and mechanistic implications for NH3 transport by Rhesus family proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 19303–19308 [PubMed]
8. Andrade S. L., Dickmanns A., Ficner R., Einsle O. (2005) Crystal structure of the archaeal ammonium transporter Amt-1 from Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14994–14999 [PubMed]
9. Hall J. A., Yan D. (2013) The molecular basis of K+ exclusion by the Escherichia coli ammonium channel AmtB. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 14080–14086 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Javelle A., Lupo D., Li X. D., Merrick M., Chami M., Ripoche P., Winkler F. K. (2007) Structural and mechanistic aspects of Amt/Rh proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 158, 472–481 [PubMed]
11. Musa-Aziz R., Chen L. M., Pelletier M. F., Boron W. F. (2009) Relative CO2/NH3 selectivities of AQP1, AQP4, AQP5, AmtB, and RhAG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 5406–5411 [PubMed]
12. Fong R. N., Kim K. S., Yoshihara C., Inwood W. B., Kustu S. (2007) The W148L substitution in the Escherichia coli ammonium channel AmtB increases flux and indicates that the substrate is an ion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18706–18711 [PubMed]
13. Javelle A., Lupo D., Ripoche P., Fulford T., Merrick M., Winkler F. K. (2008) Substrate binding, deprotonation, and selectivity at the periplasmic entrance of the Escherichia coli ammonia channel AmtB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 5040–5045 [PubMed]
14. Wang S., Orabi E. A., Baday S., Bernèche S., Lamoureux G. (2012) Ammonium transporters achieve charge transfer by fragmenting their substrate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10419–10427 [PubMed]
15. Bostick D. L., Brooks C. L., 3rd. (2007) Deprotonation by dehydration: the origin of ammonium sensing in the AmtB channel. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e22. [PubMed]
16. Nygaard T. P., Rovira C., Peters G. H., Jensen M. Ø. (2006) Ammonium recruitment and ammonia transport by E. coli ammonia channel AmtB. Biophys. J. 91, 4401–4412 [PubMed]
17. Luzhkov V. B., Almlöf M., Nervall M., Aqvist J. (2006) Computational study of the binding affinity and selectivity of the bacterial ammonium transporter AmtB. Biochemistry 45, 10807–10814 [PubMed]
18. Cao Z., Mo Y., Thiel W. (2007) Deprotonation mechanism of NH4+ in the Escherichia coli ammonium transporter AmtB: insight from QM and QM/MM calculations. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 6811–6815 [PubMed]
19. Lin Y., Cao Z., Mo Y. (2009) Functional role of Asp160 and the deprotonation mechanism of ammonium in the Escherichia coli ammonia channel protein AmtB. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 4922–4929 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Neuhäuser B., Dynowski M., Mayer M., Ludewig U. (2007) Regulation of NH4+ transport by essential cross talk between AMT monomers through the carboxyl tails. Plant Physiology 143, 1651–1659 [PubMed]
21. Wood C. C., Porée F., Dreyer I., Koehler G. J., Udvardi M. K. (2006) Mechanisms of ammonium transport, accumulation, and retention in ooyctes and yeast cells expressing Arabidopsis AtAMT1;1. FEBS Lett. 580, 3931–3936 [PubMed]
22. Mayer M., Dynowski M., Ludewig U. (2006) Ammonium ion transport by the AMT/Rh homolog LeAMT1;1. Biochem. J. 396, 431–437 [PubMed]
23. Søgaard R., Alsterfjord M., Macaulay N., Zeuthen T. (2009) Ammonium ion transport by the AMT/Rh homolog TaAMT1;1 is stimulated by acidic pH. Pflugers Arch. 458, 733–743 [PubMed]
24. Ortiz-Ramirez C., Mora S. I., Trejo J., Pantoja O. (2011) PvAMT1;1, a highly selective ammonium transporter that functions as H+/NH4+ symporter. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 31113–31122 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Neuhäuser B., Dynowski M., Ludewig U. (2009) Channel-like NH3 flux by ammonium transporter AtAMT2. FEBS Lett. 583, 2833–2838 [PubMed]
26. Guether M., Neuhäuser B., Balestrini R., Dynowski M., Ludewig U., Bonfante P. (2009) A mycorrhizal-specific ammonium transporter from Lotus japonicus acquires nitrogen released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Physiol. 150, 73–83 [PubMed]
27. Deleted in proof.
28. Mayer M., Schaaf G., Mouro I., Lopez C., Colin Y., Neumann P., Cartron J. P., Ludewig U. (2006) Different transport mechanism in plant and human AMT/Rh-type ammonium transporters. J. Gen. Physiol. 127, 133–144 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Ludewig U., Wilken S., Wu B., Jost W., Obrdlik P., El Bakkoury M., Marini A. M., André B., Hamacher T., Boles E., von Wirén N., Frommer W. B. (2003) Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of ammonium transporter-1 NH4+ uniporters. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45603–45610 [PubMed]
30. Furuichi T., Sasaki T., Tsuchiya Y., Ryan P. R., Delhaize E., Yamamoto Y. (2010) An extracellular hydrophilic carboxy-terminal domain regulates the activity of TaALMT1, the aluminum-activated malate transport protein of wheat. Plant J. 64, 47–55 [PubMed]
31. Besserer A., Burnotte E., Bienert G. P., Chevalier A. S., Errachid A., Grefen C., Blatt M. R., Chaumont F. (2012) Selective regulation of maize plasma membrane aquaporin trafficking and activity by the SNARE SYP121. Plant Cell 24, 3463–3481 [PubMed]
32. Martinez-Torres A., Miledi R. (2001) Expression of γ-aminobutyric acid ρ1 and ρ1 Δ450 as gene fusions with the green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 1947–1951 [PubMed]
33. Javelle A., Lupo D., Zheng L., Li X. D., Winkler F. K., Merrick M. (2006) An unusual twin-His arrangement in the pore of ammonia channels is essential for substrate conductance. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 39492–39498 [PubMed]
34. Loqué D., Lalonde S., Looger L. L., von Wirén N., Frommer W. B. (2007) A cytosolic trans-activation domain essential for ammonium uptake. Nature 446, 195–198 [PubMed]
35. Loqué D., Mora S. I., Andrade S. L., Pantoja O., Frommer W. B. (2009) Pore mutations in the ammonium transporter AMT1 with increased electrogenic ammonium transport activity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24988–24995 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology