PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2014 March 28; 289(13): 9000–9012.
Published online 2014 February 10. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M113.540955
PMCID: PMC3979410

Surface Tensiometry of Apolipoprotein B Domains at Lipid Interfaces Suggests a New Model for the Initial Steps in Triglyceride-rich Lipoprotein Assembly*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is the principal protein component of triacylglyceride (TAG)-rich lipoproteins, including chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein, which is the precursor to LDL (the “bad cholesterol”). TAG-rich lipoprotein assembly is initiated by the N-terminal βα1 superdomain of apoB, which co-translationally binds and remodels the luminal leaflet of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The βα1 superdomain contains four domains and is predicted to interact directly with lipids. Using drop tensiometry, we examined the interfacial properties of the α-helical and C-sheet domains and several subdomains to establish a detailed structure-function relationship at the lipid/water interface. The adsorption, stress response, exchangeability, and pressure (Π)-area relationship were studied at both triolein/water and triolein/1-palmitoyl, 2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine/water interfaces that mimic physiological environments. The α-helical domain spontaneously adsorbed to a triolein/water interface and formed a viscoelastic surface. It was anchored to the surface by helix 6, and the other helices were ejected and/or remodeled on the surface as a function of surface pressure. The C-sheet instead formed an elastic film on a triolein/water interface and was irreversibly anchored to the lipid surface, which is consistent with the behavior of amphipathic β-strands. When both domains were adsorbed together on the surface, the C-sheet shielded a portion of the α-helical domain from the surface, which retained its globular structure. Overall, the unique secondary and tertiary structures of the N-terminal domains of apoB support the intrinsic capability of co-translational lipid recruitment. The evidence presented here allows the construction of a detailed model of the initiation of TAG-rich lipoprotein assembly.

Keywords: Apolipoproteins, Atherosclerosis, Lipoprotein Secretion, Lipoprotein Structure, Phosphatidylcholine, Triacylglycerol, Apolipoprotein B, Chylomicron, Drop Tensiometry, Very Low Density Lipoprotein

Introduction

Chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), collectively known as triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs),6 distribute triacylglycerides (TAGs) to peripheral tissues for utilization or storage. The remaining particle remnants are smaller, more dense, and enriched in cholesterol esters. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the remnant particle of VLDL (1, 2), and high plasma concentrations of LDL are associated with heart attack and stroke (3).

ApoB is essential for the assembly and stability of TRLs and, in the case of LDL, its cellular uptake in humans. There are two physiological isoforms of human apoB as follows: apoB100 (4536 residues) produced in hepatocytes (2, 4) and apoB48 (the N-terminal 2152 residues or 48% of the mature apoB sequence) synthesized by enterocytes and associated with chylomicrons (5). Both isoforms of apoB are highly water-insoluble and are only found associated with lipoprotein particles in vivo (4). Because of apoB's large size and hydrophobicity, attempts to determine apoB's high resolution structure have been unsuccessful.

ApoB contains five superdomains, NH3-βα1-β1-α2-β2-α3-COOH (4), as depicted in Fig. 1A. The β1 and β2 domains are composed of a series of amphipathic β-strands that were proposed to bind directly to a lipoprotein surface and act as an anchor for the protein (4). Amphipathic β-strands are formed from a sequence of alternating hydrophobic-hydrophilic amino acids that associate to form a sheet where one side is hydrophilic and the other side is lipophilic (6). The α2 and α3 domains of apoB are predicted to form amphipathic α-helices. These helices have both a hydrophobic and hydrophilic face (7).

FIGURE 1.
A, apolipoprotein B has five putative superdomains. The βα1 superdomain of apoB has four domains as follows: the β-barrel (green); α-helical domain (cyan); C-sheet (red); and A-sheet (blue) (4). B, homology model of the ...

The N-terminal βα1 superdomain, corresponding to the first 20.5% of apoB, has both α-helical and β-sheet secondary structure and has a putative globular tertiary fold (8, 9). The βα1 domain is required for the initial assembly of TRL in enterocytes and hepatocytes (4). However, the mechanism and function of the βα1 domain during the initiation of lipoprotein assembly remain unclear. βα1 is moderately homologous to the lipid storage protein lipovitellin (LV) (Fig. 2) (8, 9). The high resolution crystal structure of LV has been used to construct structural models of βα1 (8, 10). The LV homology model, shown in Fig. 1B, predicts that the βα1 superdomain contains four domains as follows: an N-terminal β-barrel (apoB5.9); an α-helical domain (αHD, apoB6–13); and two AβS-rich domains called the C-sheet (apoB13–17) and A-sheet (apoB17–20.5). At the center of the dimeric LV structure is a small lipid droplet stabilized by the N-terminal half of the αHD, the C-sheet, and A-sheet domains of both monomers (8, 9). The structure of the isolated domains of apoB are consistent with the LV model, based on circular dichroism spectroscopy, cross-linking, and limited proteolysis (11).

FIGURE 2.
Sequence alignment of apoB17 (1st line) and lamprey lipovitellin (2nd line). Black bars above the apoB17 sequence indicate conserved sequence motifs (N1–N13), and the highlighted amino acids are residues that are conserved within the large lipoprotein ...

According to the LV model, the αHD contains 17 α-helices that form two layers that arc around the lipid binding pocket (Fig. 1, C and D). Helix 6 (and potentially helices 4 and 8) are in direct contact with the lipid core. Helices 1–3 are at the intersection of the β-barrel and A-sheet domains (Fig. 1C). Helices 10–17 are shielded from the lipid core by interaction with the C-sheet. The helices have different amphipathic characteristics (Figs. 1D and and3).3). Helices 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 15–17 have an amphipathic cross-section. Helices 2, 11, 13, and 14 have a seemingly random distribution of amino acids. Helices 4, 6, and 8 are very hydrophobic and have a hydrophobic face that spans more than 180°. A construct encoding the αHD (see Table 1 for construct sequences) interacts strongly with lipids and clears 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine multilamellar vesicles and forms bilayer discs. The N-terminal half of the αH domain containing helices 1–10 (H1–10) clears 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine at the same rate as the entire αHD. The C-terminal helices 9–17 (H9–17) do not, suggesting a globular structure with hydrophobic residues sequestered in the core (12).

FIGURE 3.
Helical wheel diagrams of the 17 α-helices of the αHD. Yellow amino acids are hydrophobic; blue amino acids are basic; red amino acids are acidic, gray amino acids are polar, and pink amino acids are glycines or prolines. The one-letter ...
TABLE 1
Constructs used in this study

The C-sheet is composed of six anti-parallel amphipathic β-strands with an additional long loop (apoB residues 706–728 in Fig. 2) missing in the LV crystal structure between strands 4 and 5, which may contain some amphipathic α-helices but little or no amphipathic β-strands (Fig. 1C) (13). The very hydrophobic face of the C-sheet is predicted to be in direct contact with the lipid core (8, 9). The hydrophilic face is predicted to form salt-bridge interactions with the C-terminal half of the αHD (8, 9). By itself, the C-sheet sequence clears 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine vesicles extremely rapidly (12). The A-sheet is less homologous to LV than the rest of the βα1 domain and is only partially modeled. It is predicted to form eight amphipathic β-strands but is not soluble in solution without detergent (12). The A-sheet is predicted to interact with the β-barrel and α-helical domains and is considered the beginning of the β1 domain.

The co-translational lipidation of apoB is the initial and essential step in TRL secretion. It is postulated that as domains of apoB are translocated into the rough ER, they recruit neutral lipids and remodel the ER lipids to bud off from the membrane in a primordial particle complexed with polar and neutral lipids. Budding may occur by forming a “micro-lens” of neutral lipid in the membrane, which ultimately buds off into the lumen of the rough ER. The molecular details of how the structure of the βα1 superdomain supports the initiation of TRL assembly remain a mystery.

We postulate that the mechanism of lipid recruitment is determined by the physical properties of each domain at the lipid/water interface. We and others have shown that drop tensiometry is a powerful tool for investigating protein functions at the lipid/water interface (14,17).

Here, we report on the Π-area isotherm at a triolein/water interface of the αHD, the C-sheet, and a construct containing both domains (αHD+C) and several other critical segments of apoB within this region. Several remodeling intermediates within the helices of the αHD at the interface are visible as the surface pressure (Π) is changed. These remodeling intermediates correspond to transitions in specific helices as they are reproduced in truncated constructs containing subsets of helices. We also characterize the adsorption of our constructs to a triolein/POPC/water as it has a monolayer of phospholipid that more closely resembles the ER membrane interface. We quantitate binding by determining the exclusion pressure (ΠEX), which is the pressure above which a construct cannot bind the interface (18). These insights into the structure-function relationship of the βα1 superdomain based on the interfacial properties allow us to propose a more detailed, step-by-step mechanism for the initial co-translational assembly of TRLs.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Drop Tensiometry

All experiments were performed with an IT Concepts Oil-Drop Tensiometer (Longessaigne, France) (19). A 16-μl drop of triolein (99.7% pure, Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN) was formed at the tip of a J-tube submerged in 6 ml of bulk buffer. The bulk buffer was 2 mm sodium phosphate buffer at a pH of 7.4 ± 0.1. Two sets of experiments were performed.

Linear Isotherms of Protein at a Triolein/Water Interface

ApoB-derived proteins (see below) were added to the solution surrounding a triolein drop. The triolein drop had a surface tension of 32 mN/m, which is considered “0” pressure. The protein spontaneously adsorbed to the triolein/water interface and raised the surface pressure (Π). After reaching the equilibrium surface pressure (ΠEQ), the excess unbound protein was removed from the bulk solution by flowing 220 ml of peptide-free bulk buffer through the cuvette. This “washout” effectively depleted the bulk peptide by >99.9% (16, 20). After the washout, the drop was slowly and linearly expanded at a rate of ~2.7 mm2/min, held at a large area for ~1000 s, then linearly compressed at a rate of ~2.7 mm2/min. In some experiments the linear expansions and compressions were repeated (see Fig. 4). The isotherm was determined by plotting Π versus area during a compression. The expanded Π/area curves shown in Figs. 6610 were obtained using this protocol.

FIGURE 4.
Protocol for reversible isotherms. In this example experiment, αHD was adsorbed to a triolein/water interface and washed out after reaching an equilibrium Π. After the washout, the drop was linearly expanded and then linearly compressed ...
FIGURE 6.
Linear compression isotherms of the C-sheet (A) and the αHD (B) at the triolein/water interface using the protocol from Fig. 5. The black dot on the x axis indicates the area of the drop during the initial adsorption.
FIGURE 7.
Π-A isotherms of the C-sheet at a triolein/water interface were reversible. The arrows indicate the direction where the area was changing for the closest isotherms. Compressions 3 and 4 were the same size and were reversible but had a small loss ...
FIGURE 8.
Pressure in the Π-A isotherm of the αHD at the triolein/water interface increased as the area of the drop was reduced (a compression). The compression was reversible and showed a large hysteresis. There was a wait time of 1500 s between ...
FIGURE 9.
Π-A isotherms at the triolein/water interface of helical domain constructs feature TP. A, αHD. The raw data for αHD is the same as in Fig. 6B. The derivative of the isotherm is shown below the data in gray to highlight the TPs ...
FIGURE 10.
Π-area isotherm of αHD+C (containing the αH domain and C-sheet) at the triolein/water interface. The TPs are like the other α-helical domain proteins but are less distinct and had less well defined maxima. Only 4 out of ...

Exclusion Pressure (ΠEX) of Protein at a Triolein/POPC/Water Interface

A triolein/POPC/water interface was created by adsorbing POPC (Avanti Polar Lipids) small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) to a triolein/water interface as described by Mitsche et al. (20). SUVs were made by sonicating aqueous POPC for 1 h using a probe sonicator (Branson). After a washout to remove SUVs, the drop was compressed to the specific initial pressure (Πi) (Fig. 11). Then the protein was added to a bulk concentration of ~3 μg/ml. After adding the protein, the surface area was increased in ~2-mm2 steps until increasing the area did not cause Π to decrease due to protein adsorption. The details for estimating ΠEX from these data are explained in Fig. 11.

FIGURE 11.
Exclusion pressure determination of αHD at the triolein/POPC/water interface. A, triolein/POPC/water interface was formed by adsorbing POPC small unilamellar vesicles to a triolein drop, washing out the excess POPC, and then compressing the surface ...

Protein Preparation

The following peptides were studied: αHD+C, αHD, H1–10, H1–6, H1–5 H1–4, H9–17, S1–4, and C-sheet (Table 1). The sequence for each peptide is shown in Fig. 2. There is an N-terminal methionine and a C-terminal His6 tag on each construct. The proteins were cloned in pET24a vector (Novagen) and expressed in BL21 DE3 Escherichia coli cells (Novagen) using standard protocols. For expression, cells were grown at 37 °C to an optical density of 0.6–0.8 at 600 nm in Luria broth supplemented with 34 μg/ml kanamycin. Protein expression was induced with 1 mm isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside, and the cells were grown for an additional 3 h. Cell pellets were lysed with 1 mg/ml lysozyme at room temperature for 30 min and then sonicated. The protein inclusion bodies were dissolved in 8 m urea after washing with 1% Triton X-100 and 1 m urea. Soluble proteins were loaded on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-Sepharose (Qiagen) and eluted with 250 mm imidazole in 6 m guanidine hydrochloride. Protein refolding was achieved by rapidly diluting concentrated protein stock in 6 m guanidine hydrochloride to a final protein concentration of 1 μm into a refolding buffer containing 50 mm Tris, 800 mm arginine, 10 mm reduced glutathione, 2 mm oxidized glutathione, 0.02% sodium azide at pH 8.0. The refolding mixture was incubated at 4 °C overnight and then dialyzed extensively against 10 mm Tris, 150 mm sodium chloride, pH 7.5 (TS buffer). The refolded protein was later re-concentrated on another nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column, and eluted with 250 mm imidazole in TS buffer. Finally, the protein was desalted to 2 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). The final solution had a protein concentration of 0.1–0.3 mg/ml and was stored at 4 °C for no more than a week. The protein concentration was determined using a standard Lowry method (21) and by the adsorption at 280 nm (22). Both methods were consistent within 5% of the concentration. The αHD+C, αHD, S1–4, and C-sheet constructs have previously been shown to be folded with the secondary structure expected from the lipovitellin model by circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) (11) as have H1–10 and H9–17 (23). The H1–6, H1–5, and H1–4 constructs have the expected helical CD signal and unfold cooperatively in urea denaturation experiments monitored by CD (data not shown). For drop tensiometry experiments, a small amount of peptide stock (~100 μl) was added to 6 ml of bulk buffer resulting in a final bulk concentration of ~3 μg/ml. See Table 2 for the bulk protein concentration and equilibrium surface pressure (ΠEQ) of each protein.

TABLE 2
Adsorption characteristics of proteins from the βα1 domain of apoB of the triolein/water interface

RESULTS

Π-area Isotherms of the α-Helical and C-sheet Domains at the Triolein/Water Interface

The Π-A relationship of a monolayer at constant temperature, called the “isotherm,” is an important indicator of monolayer properties. For complex monolayers, the isotherm is particularly useful because it yields compressibility information and highlights phase transitions and molecular rearrangements, which cause nonidealities during a compression of the surface area. The isotherms were determined for each protein by first adsorbing the protein to a triolein/water interface in the drop tensiometer, washing out the excess protein, and then linearly expanding and compressing the surface by changing the volume of the drop via the motorized syringe (as described in Fig. 5). The reversibility of the isotherms was determined by repeatedly linearly expanding and compressing the surface in progressively larger intervals (see Fig. 4).

FIGURE 5.
Protocol used to determine the isotherms of the apoB domains. The protein was adsorbed to the surface of a triolein droplet in the Oil-Drop Tensiometer. The shape of the drop was recorded by the camera of the tensiometer and provides the surface tension ...

During a linear compression at a triolein/water interface, the Π increased for both the C-sheet and the αHD as the area was reduced by removing volume from the drop in the tensiometer (Fig. 6). The isotherm of the C-sheet (Fig. 6A) was linear both during expansions and compressions. The isotherms of both proteins were reversibly compressible (see Figs. 7 and and8).8). The slope of the C-sheet isotherm was smooth without any clear or reproducible breaks or discontinuities (i.e. rapid changes in slope). This is indicative of an elastic surface that quickly remodeled upon compression of the surface. The lack of breaks or discontinuities in the isotherm suggests no major remodeling events of the protein structure or the surface in response to compressions. Instead, there was a gradual re-aligning of the strands to exert more Π as their surface density increased. The expansion and compression isotherms of the C-sheet were roughly parallel to one another indicating little hysteresis. Thus, the C-sheet was highly compressible and elastic, a property characteristic of other amphipathic β-strands (6, 24).

The αHD had a fascinating compression isotherm (Fig. 6B). Foremost, unlike the C-sheet, its isotherm is nonlinear. More interestingly, there were clear discontinuities in the isotherm with rapid increases in the slope (Fig. 9A). We term these discontinuities “transition points” (TP), and five of these TPs reproducibly occurred at the same Π and area when the isotherm was repeated within the same or independent experiments (Fig. 8). At these transition points, the area decreased with little or no change in Π, consistent with a very large compressibility, indicating a conformational phase transition in the protein monolayer. The average Π for each TP is shown in Table 3. When the surface was re-expanded (Fig. 8), the TPs occurred roughly at the same area but at a lower Π due to hysteresis.

TABLE 3
Transition points in the isotherm of apoB helical domain constructs at the triolein/water interface

TP 1 occurs at the highest Π (smallest surface area), and TP 5 occurs at the lowest Π (largest surface area). Because these transition points are observed in the exchangeable, amphipathic α-helices of the αHD, but are notably absent from the nonexchangeable amphipathic β-sheets of the C-sheet (17), the obvious physical explanation for these transition points is the ejection or expulsion of individual or subsets of helices from the triolein/water interface into the aqueous phase. Thus, the αHD undergoes five major structural rearrangements over this range of surface pressures.

Π-area Isotherms of Portions of the α-Helical Domain

To determine which helices of αHD are ejected from the drop surface by increasing Π at each TP, isotherms of smaller constructs containing only part of the 17-helix αHD were examined. Four additional proteins were studied as follows: H1–4, H1–6, H1–10, and H9–17 (Table 1). The isotherms of these smaller constructs also had TPs, and intriguingly, these TPs are subsets of TPs observed for the complete αHD (Fig. 9, B–E). The Π of each TP was approximately the same for all αHD proteins. However, none of the smaller proteins had all five TPs of the αHD isotherm (see Table 3 for a summary). H1–4 exhibited only two TPs corresponding the Π of TPs 2 and 3 of the intact αHD. The isotherm remained smooth at the transition pressures expected for TPs 1, 4, and 5 showing the absence of these TPs. Therefore, helices 1–4 undergo transitions at TPs 2 and 3. The H1–6 isotherm has TPs 1–3 of the intact αHD. Because TP 1 was present in H1–6 but not in H1–4, TP 1 could be attributed to a change in helices 5–6, which are part of H1–6 but absent in H1–4. Similarly, H1–10 exhibited TPs 1–3 like H1–6 but also had TP 4, indicating TP 4 occurs within helices 7–10. H9–17 had TPs 4 and 5, and a sixth TP at a low Π that was only seen with H9–17. Because TP 4 is found in H1–10 and H9–17, it must arise from helices 9–10 found in both constructs. Also, H9–17 undergoes TP 5, indicating that TP 5 must occur within helices 11–17, as helices 9–10 undergo TP 4.

We also examined the triolein/water isotherm of a larger construct, αHD+C, that contains the αHD and C-sheet to determine whether it underwent similar TPs. αHD+C only exhibited TPs 1–4, the four high-Π TPs, but they were not as dramatic as the isolated αHD domain (see Fig. 10). The equilibrium adsorption Π was between that of TP 3 and 4. At Π values less than TP 4, Π dropped at a linear rate, similar to the C-sheet. Therefore, αHD+C adsorbed to the surface at an equilibrium conformation where the N-terminal helices (H1–10) were likely in contact with the surface, but the C-terminal helices (H11–17) were not. When the surface was compressed, the helices remodeled at TP 1–4 as observed with αHD. This suggests that helices 11–17 did not bind to the interface. Instead, they fold against the more polar face of the C-sheet whose hydrophobic face is in direct contact with the triolein of the drop. This conformation is quite similar to that proposed for αHD+C based on its compression isotherm at an air/water interface measured with a Langmuir trough (16).

Protein Exclusion Pressure (ΠEX) at a Triolein/POPC/Water Interface

Physiological TAG/water interfaces are mostly covered with an amphipathic monolayer composed primarily of phospholipids. Therefore, a triolein/POPC/water interface is a better model to study the initial adsorption of the αHD or C-sheet to a lipid surface like the ER luminal membrane. The affinity of a protein for a triolein/POPC/water interface can be quantified by determining its exclusion pressure (ΠEX). ΠEX is defined as the surface pressure of a phospholipid monolayer where protein cannot penetrate the surface (18, 25, 26). When the initial pressure of the interface, ΠI, is greater than the exclusion pressure (i.e. ΠI > ΠEX), the protein is unable to insert into the interface. With ΠI < ΠEX, the protein can insert.

In our experiments, ΠEX was determined by adding the peptide to the bulk buffer surrounding a POPC-covered triolein drop with a high ΠI (>15 mN/m). The triolein/POPC/water interface was made by adsorbing POPC SUVs to a triolein/water interface followed by a washout (20). After the washout of POPC, the surface was compressed to increase ΠI. After the protein was added to the surrounding solution, the drop was slowly expanded in a stepwise fashion (with the protein in the bulk) until increasing the area did not decrease Π (see Fig. 11). In the presence of protein, the Π would be increased if the initial pressure, ΠI, was less than the exclusion pressure, ΠEX, of the protein (ΠI < ΠEX). If ΠI > ΠEX, there was no change in Π as the peptide cannot penetrate the surface (for example see the arrow in Fig. 11A). The surface was then expanded in a stepwise fashion (each step was less than 1 μl (~2 mm2)). The change in Π from adsorbing protein (ΔΠProtein) was equal to the equilibrium Π after an expansion, minus the ΠI of the POPC at the interface without any added protein that was determined in another experiment (black line, Fig. 11B). We can then determine ΠEX of the protein by plotting the ΔΠProtein at each expansion, versus the known Π of the POPC at that expanded area (that is the ΠI) and extrapolating to a ΔΠProtein of 0 (Fig. 11C).

The relationship between ΔΠProtein and ΠI was linear for all proteins (see Figs. 11 and and12).12). The ΠEX of αHD and the constructs with portions of the αHD ranged from 21–23 mN/m (see Table 4 and Fig. 12). The C-sheet had a ΠEX = 18.7 mN/m, significantly lower than ΠEX of the αHD. A construct containing only the first four of the six strands (S1–4) of the C-sheet had a ΠEX, identical to the full C-sheet construct. The αHD+C construct, with both the C-sheet and αHD domains, had a ΠEX = 22.2 mN/m, which is characteristic of the αHD alone. This suggests that the αHD+C construct initiates binding to triolein/POPC/water interface with the α-helices of the αHD, especially at high ΠI.

FIGURE 12.
Exclusion pressure data. Raw data used to measure ΠEX of the series of proteins at a triolein/POPC/water interface is reported in Table 4. ΠEX is equal to the linear regression of ΔΠProtein and ΠI (see Fig. 11). ...
TABLE 4
Exclusion pressures (ΠEX) and ΠEQ for apoB constructs

The difference between the αHD and C-sheet domains is more pronounced when binding at the triolein/POPC/water interface (ΠEX) is compared with that at the triolein/water interface (ΠEQ) (see Table 4). The αHD proteins' ΠEX at the triolein/POPC/water interface is 4–5 mN/m greater than ΠEQ at the triolein/water interface. Therefore, the αHD has a higher affinity for a triolein/POPC/water interface than a triolein/water interface so phospholipids increase the binding affinity of the helices. In contrast, for the C-sheet proteins ΠEX ≈ ΠEQ, which indicates the C-sheet has very little affinity for interfacial phospholipids. The C-sheet only adsorbed to the triolein/POPC/water interface at low surface pressures of POPC where there are probably patches of continuous triolein available to form a binding site. Thus, the C-sheet has an equivalent interfacial affinity for both interfaces, indicating the C-sheet preferentially binds triolein at both interfaces.

DISCUSSION

The process of lipid recruitment by the βα1 domain of apoB requires structural rearrangements of the protein to first recognize TAGs exposed in the ER membrane, bind to the membrane, recruit additional lipids, and finally create a binding site for the β1 superdomain of apoB when it is translocated. Given the disruptive nature of hydrophobic lipids during protein folding, the βα1 must orchestrate this highly coordinated process to avoid protein misfolding or improper particle assembly. Importantly, the translation rate of the nascent apoB (minutes) is much slower than the expected folding rate of the domains encoded in the βα1 superdomain ([double less-than sign] seconds) so these individual domains are likely to fold as they exit the translocon, well before they are assembled into the final primordial particle.

The βα1 domain contains both α-helical and β-sheet structure. Amphipathic α-helices and amphipathic β-strands have different properties at a lipid interface (6, 24). The helices exchange on and off a hydrophobic interface and behave viscoelastically. The helices remodel in response to changes in Π and can be ejected from the surface in a sequential and Π-dependent fashion (27). The large αHD displays discrete remodeling/ejection events as seen by the five transition points in its compression isotherm at the triolein/water interface (Fig. 9). Furthermore, these TPs are conserved in the smaller constructs allowing us to localize the helices that are remodeled/ejected. Each TP most likely indicates a surface pressure-dependent protein rearrangement.

It is instructive to follow the rearrangement of the helices of the αHD construct at the triolein/water interface during a compression from a high to low surface area (Fig. 13). At high area, the surface pressure is low (Π <17 mN/m) and both the N- and C-terminal helices spread on the surface. As the protein is compressed, the C-terminal helices (H9–17) are first ejected from the surface (TP 5 and 4). At a moderate surface pressure (Π = 22–25 mN/m), helices 1–4 remodel and are ejected in two steps (TP 3 and TP 2). At the highest surface pressure (above TP 1), the core helices (H5–8) remodel, but the αHD remains anchored to the surface by helix 6. The very hydrophobic helix 6 remains embedded in the interface to anchor the peptide at the surface even at the highest surface pressure. This anchoring prevents all constructs containing H6 from desorbing from the surface and allows a rapid response to changes in area.

FIGURE 13.
Potential structures of the αHD at the triolein/water interface at each transition point. The helices of αHD are numbered 1–17. Yellow indicates the hydrophobic triolein. Surface area increases from left to right. Conversely, surface ...

In our experiments, the αHD adsorbed to the triolein/water interface from the bulk solution to an equilibrium pressure between TP 2 and TP 3. Therefore, it adsorbed in a compact conformation, where the C-terminal nine helices were excluded from the surface and only some of the N-terminal eight helices were on the surface. Compression caused the N-terminal four helices to be ejected from the surface, whereas expansion led to binding by the C-terminal helices H10–17. Thus, the conformationally flexible interfacial structure of the αHD allows the βα1 superdomain to remodel as the composition and surface pressure of bound protein changes during initial lipoprotein assembly.

Amphipathic β-strands of the C-sheet have a higher affinity for a triolein/water interface than amphipathic α-helices and exert more surface pressure both when adsorbed and expanded (6, 24). The C-sheet binds irreversibly to a triolein/water interface and cannot be pushed off the droplet surface by compression. Based on their exclusion pressures (ΠEX) at the triolein/POPC/water interface (Table 4), they do not appear to interact with phospholipid and prefer the more hydrophobic triolein. The strands form an elastic interface that responds rapidly to compressions in an ideal manner. Ideal elastic remodeling could only occur if a continuous β-sheet was formed on the interface where a long range network of strand-strand interactions stabilizes the interface. Thus, the C-sheet displays near ideal two-dimensional behavior.

The αHD and C-sheet domains have different lipid binding activities (see Table 4). The C-sheet exerted more Π on a triolein/water interface. However, the αHD exerted more Π on a triolein/POPC/water interface and penetrated a higher initial surface pressure (ΠI) than the C-sheet. For the C-sheet to bind a triolein/POPC/water interface, the ΠI must be lower than C-sheet triolein/water equilibrium surface pressure (ΠEQ). Thus, the monolayer of POPC shields the C-sheet from binding to the hydrophobic TAG core. Conversely, POPC enhances the binding of the αHD. The αHD was able to bind a triolein/POPC/water interface with a ΠI > ΠEQ for the triolein/water interface. Therefore, the αHD has a higher affinity for a mixed triolein/POPC interface than a pure triolein interface.

αHD+C, which includes both domains, also adsorbed to a triolein/water interface in a compact structure (Fig. 10). In the adsorbed conformation, the C-terminal half of the αHD (H11–17) had a globular conformation and was shielded from the interface by the C-sheet. The N-terminal helices (H1–10) were partially unfolded and spread at the interface (16). When the monolayer of adsorbed αHD+C was compressed, the N-terminal helices remodeled to adapt to the smaller area per molecule. When the monolayer was expanded, the C-sheet remodeled while still shielding H11–17 from the lipid.

The unique two-layered helical structure of the αHD provides remarkable adaptability in both lipid binding and domain folding. Putting these findings into context with other studies of the βα1 superdomain, such as the LV structure of the βα1 superdomain (8,11, 13, 28), in vitro lipid binding assays (12, 14, 17, 23, 29), the conserved sequence motifs (9, 30), and apoB C-terminal truncation secretion (31,33), we have developed a more detailed mechanism of initial co-translational apoB lipid binding (see Fig. 14), using the TPs we report here as a road map. Note that we have measured the binding of isolated domains, not intact apoB, and that our system uses model interfaces and not the ER membrane or ER-resident lipid droplets, nor does our system contain microsomal triglyceride transfer protein or any of the other chaperones that are essential for VLDL secretion. Thus, our mechanism only addresses the interaction of apoB domains with lipids and not the critical role of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, chaperones, or any other proteins that are essential for VLDL secretion.

FIGURE 14.
Model of apoB TAG recruitment. A, after translocation of the β-barrel domain (green) through the translocon (black), lipid binding to the ER membrane (shaded black box) is initiated by the binding of helices 6 and 8 from the helical domain (cyan ...

The ER membrane likely resembles a highly compressed POPC monolayer with a high Π. There is a high concentration of PC, but other molecules like TAG and proteins are dispersed in the membrane, which lower the Π and create potential binding sites for apoB. The αHD can bind to these small binding sites, but the C-sheet cannot because of the high concentration of PC. The β-barrel domain and first four helices of the αHD do not have a high lipid affinity, so they are translocated into the lumen of the rough ER without binding lipid. As they are translocated, chaperones and microsomal triglyceride transfer proteins (not shown in the figure) are recruited to the site to facilitate the folding of the more hydrophobic portions of apoB. When the hydrophobic H6 is expressed and translocated, the protein binds the luminal leaflet of the rough ER and perhaps nucleates a TAG-enriched membrane patch (Fig. 14A and supplemental video 1). When the αHD binds the membrane, H1–4 partially unfolds to bind the membrane. As additional helices are translocated (H7–17), they also partially unfold to bind the membrane surface (Fig. 14B). As the αHD binds the surface, TAGs diffuse to the binding site and remain shielded from the water by the protein. This results in the passive accumulation of neutral lipids at the binding site of apoB as it is expressed. When the C-sheet is expressed and translocated, it first displaces H11–17 and then recruits a patch of TAG that binds to its hydrophobic face (Fig. 14C). The architecture of the ER-membrane does not dramatically remodel until the A-sheet has been translocated. Translocation of the A-sheet displaces H1–4 from the surface allowing it to bind to TAG and increase Π (Fig. 14D). In this extended membrane-bound conformation, the βα1 domain will have created a high surface pressure in the ER membrane. To alleviate the high surface pressure, the protein remodels the ER membrane to form a TAG-rich “bud” such that the amphipathic β-strands can bind favorably to the TAG-enriched membrane (Fig. 14E), but the overall surface pressure is reduced. The loops of the A-sheet can now interact with the conserved β-barrel domain forming a tertiary structure similar to that of lipovitellin with the lipid bud filling the lipovitellin lipid pocket. Once a bud is formed, the β1 superdomain will be capable of binding to the neutral lipids exposed at the membrane surface. Detachment of the bud as a nascent lipoprotein is required to complete the early stage of TRL assembly.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge helpful discussions with Dr. Haya Herscovitz.

*This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 HL094510 (to C. J. M.) and PO1 HL026335 (to D. M. S.). This work was also supported by a Boston University Graduate Student Research Fellowship (to J. W. B.).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental Video.

6The abbreviations used are:

TRL
triglyceride-rich lipoprotein
αHD
α-helical domain containing 17 helices (apoB6–13)
apoB
apolipoprotein B
A-sheet
apoB17–20.5
C-sheet
apoB13–17
ER
endoplasmic reticulum
LV
lipovitellin
POPC
1-palmitoyl, 2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine
SUV
small unilamellar vesicles
TAG
triacylglyceride
TP
transition point
mN
millinewton.

REFERENCES

1. Zannis V. I., Kypreos K. E., Chroni A., Kardassis D., Zanni D. D. (2004) in Molecular Mechanism of Cardiovascular Disease (Loscalzo J., editor. , ed) pp. 111–174, Taylor and Francis, New York
2. Havel R. J., Kane J. P. (2001) in The Metabolic Bases of Inherited Disease (Scriver C. R., Beaudet A. L., William S. S., Valle D., editors. , eds) pp. 2705–2716, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
3. Franco M., Cooper R. S., Bill U., Foster V. (2011) Challenges and opportunities for cardiovascular disease prevention. Am. J. Med. 124, 95–102 [PubMed]
4. Serest J. P., Jones M. K., De Loaf H., Datta N. (2001) Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 42, 1346–1367 [PubMed]
5. Kendrick J. S., Chan L., Higgins J. A. (2001) Superior role of apolipoprotein B48 over apolipoprotein B100 in chylomicron assembly and fat absorption: An investigation of apobec-1 knock-out and wild-type mice. Biochem. J. 356, 821–827 [PubMed]
6. Wang L., Small D. M. (2004) Interfacial properties of amphipathic β strand consensus peptides of apolipoprotein B at oil/water interfaces. J. Lipid Res. 45, 1704–1715 [PubMed]
7. Segrest J. P., Jones M. K., De Loof H., Brouillette C. G., Venkatachalapathi Y. V., Anantharamaiah G. M. (1992) The amphipathic helix in the exchangeable apolipoproteins–A review of secondary structure and function. J. Lipid Res. 33, 141–166 [PubMed]
8. Mann C. J., Anderson T. A., Read J., Chester S. A., Harrison G. B., Köchl S., Ritchie P. J., Bradbury P., Hussain F. S., Amey J., Vanloo B., Rosseneu M., Infante R., Hancock J. M., Levitt D. G., Banaszak L. J., Scott J., Shoulders C. C. (1999) The structure of vitellogenin provides a molecular model for the assembly and secretion of atherogenic lipoproteins. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 391–408 [PubMed]
9. Segrest J. P., Jones M. K., Dashti N. (1999) N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein B has structural homology to lipovitellin and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein: a “lipid pocket” model for self-assembly of apoB-containing lipoprotein particles. J. Lipid Res. 40, 1401–1416 [PubMed]
10. Raag R., Appelt K., Xuong N. H., Banaszak L. (1988) Structure of the lamprey yolk lipid protein complex lipovitellin phosvitin at 2.8-Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 200, 553–569 [PubMed]
11. Jiang Z. G., Carraway M., McKnight C. J. (2005) Limited proteolysis and biophysical characterization of the lipovitellin homology region in apolipoprotein B. Biochemistry 44, 1163–1173 [PubMed]
12. Jiang Z. G., Gantz D., Bullitt E., McKnight C. J. (2006) Defining lipid-interacting domains in the N-terminal region of apolipoprotein B. Biochemistry 45, 11799–11808 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Thompson J. R., Banaszak L. J. (2002) Lipid-protein interactions in lipovitellin. Biochemistry 41, 9398–9409 [PubMed]
14. Ledford A. S., Cook V. A., Shelness G. S., Weinberg R. B. (2009) Structural and dynamic interfacial properties of the lipoprotein initiating domain of apolipoprotein B. J. Lipid Res. 50, 108–115 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Weinberg R. B., Cook V. R., DeLozier J. A., Shelness G. S. (2000) Dynamic interfacial properties of human apolipoproteins A-IV and B-17 at the air/water and oil/water interface. J. Lipid Res. 41, 1419–1427 [PubMed]
16. Mitsche M. A., Wang L., Jiang Z. G., McKnight C. J., Small D. M. (2009) Interfacial properties of a complex multi-domain 490 amino acid peptide derived from apolipoprotein B (residues 292–782). Langmuir 25, 2322–2330 [PubMed]
17. Wang L., Jiang Z. G., McKnight C. J., Small D. M. (2010) Interfacial properties of apolipoprotein B292–593 (B6.4–13) and B611–782 (B13–17). Insights into the structure of the lipovitellin homology region in apolipoprotein B. Biochemistry 49, 3898–3907 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Mitsche M. A., Small D. M. (2011) C terminus of apolipoprotein A-I removes phospholipid from a triolein/phospholipids/water interface, but the N-terminus does not: A possible mechanism for nascent HDL assembly. Biophys. J. 101, 353–361 [PubMed]
19. Labourdenne S., Gaudryrolland N., Letellier S., Lin M., Cagna A., Esposito G., Verger R., Riviere C. (1994) The oil-drop tensiometer–Potential applications for studying the kinetics of (Phospho) lipase action. Chem. Phys. Lipids 71, 163–173
20. Mitsche M. A., Wang L., Small D. M. (2010) Adsorption of egg-PC to an air/water and triolein/water bubble interface: Use of the 2-dimensional phase rule to estimate the surface composition of a phospholipid/triolein/water surface as a function of surface pressure. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 3276–3284 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 [PubMed]
22. Pace C. N., Vajdos F., Fee L., Grimsley G., Gray T. (1995) How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 4, 2411–2423 [PubMed]
23. Jiang Z. G., Simon M. N., Wall J. S., McKnight C. J. (2007) Structural analysis of reconstituted lipoproteins containing the N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein B. Biophys. J. 92, 4097–4108 [PubMed]
24. Wang L., Martin D. D., Genter E., Wang J., McLeod R. S., Small D. M. (2009) Surface study of apoB1694–1880, a sequence that can anchor apoB to lipoproteins and make it nonexchangeable. J. Lipid Res. 50, 1340–1352 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Weinberg R. B., Ibdah J. A., Phillips M. C. (1992) Adsorption of apolipoprotein-A-IV to phospholipid monolayers spread at the air-water-interface- a model for its labile binding to high-density-lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8977–8983 [PubMed]
26. Ibdah J. A., Krebs K. E., Phillips M. C. (1989) The surface-properties of apolipoproteins A-I and A-II at the lipid water interface. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1004, 300–308 [PubMed]
27. Small D. M., Wang L., Mitsche M. A. (2009) The adsorption of biological peptides and proteins at the oil/water interface. A potentially important but largely unexplored field. J. Lipid Res. 50, S329–S334 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Richardson P. E., Manchekar M., Dashti N., Jones M. K., Beigneux A., Young S. G., Harvey S. C., Segrest J. P. (2005) Assembly of lipoprotein particles containing apolipoprotein-B: structural model for the nascent lipoprotein particle, Biophys. J. 88, 2789–2800 [PubMed]
29. Jiang Z. G., Liu Y., Hussain M. M., Atkinson D., McKnight C. J. (2008) Reconstituting initial events during the assembly of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in a cell-free system. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 1181–1194 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Smolenaars M. M., Madsen O., Rodenburg K. W., van der Horst D. J. (2007) Molecular diversity and evolution of the large lipid transfer protein superfamily. J. Lipid Res. 48, 489–502 [PubMed]
31. Shelness G. S., Hou L., Ledford A. S., Parks J. S., Weinberg R. B. (2003) Identification of the lipoprotein initiating domain of apolipoprotein B. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 44702–44707 [PubMed]
32. Herscovitz H., Derksen A., Walsh M. T., McKnight C. J., Gantz D. L., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras M., Zannis V., Curry C., Small D. M. (2001) The N-terminal 17% of apoB binds tightly and irreversibly to emulsions modeling nascent very low density lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 42, 51–59 [PubMed]
33. Carraway M., Herscovitz H., Zannis V., Small D. M. (2000) Specificity of lipid incorporation is determined by sequences in the N-terminal 37 of apoB. Biochemistry 39, 9737–9745 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology