Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 March 26.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3966021

Environmental Remediation in the Treatment of Allergy and Asthma: Latest Updates

Lakiea S. Wright
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, One Jimmy Fund Way, Smith Building Rm 638, Boston, MA 02215, USA


In the modern era, the prevalence of asthma and allergies are increasing. It has been speculated that environmental exposures are contributing to this rise. Several studies demonstrate that common indoor allergen exposures exacerbate asthma. Minimizing exposure to allergens and remediating the environment play a critical role in the treatment of asthma and allergies. The most effective environmental control measures are tailored multifaceted interventions which include education, thorough cleaning, using high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, integrated pest management, and maintenance of these practices.

Keywords: Asthma, Allergen, House dust mite, Cat, Dog, Mold, Endotoxin, Cockroach, Rodents, Environmental tobacco smoke, Air pollution, Home remediation, Integrated pest management


It has been speculated that the increasing prevalence of asthma and allergies, over the past few decades, is attributable to an increase in environmental exposures. In the modern era, environmental exposures are important because we spend more time indoors with increasing temperatures and humidity which are ideal conditions for the growth of mold and dust mites [1]. Important indoor allergens and irritants include the house dust mite, domestic pets, mold, cockroach, mouse, environmental tobacco smoke, endotoxin, and air pollution. In this article, we will review the literature on environmental interventions in the treatment of asthma and allergies. The most effective environmental remediation strategies include multifaceted interventions tailored to specific exposures and allergen sensitizations (Table 1).

Table 1
Summary of allergens and environmental remediation strategies

House Dust Mite

The most common species of the house dust mite (HDM) are Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae. The most extensive studies of allergen levels and sensitization have been conducted using the HDM. Cysteine proteases found in the HDM’s gut and fecal particles are potent inducers of allergic disease [2]. Studies have demonstrated that there is a dose–response relationship between HDM exposure and allergen sensitization [3]. HDM sensitization in asthmatics is associated with an increased risk of medication use and health care utilization including asthma-related unscheduled visits and hospitalizations [4].

There are multiple studies which have examined the efficacy of HDM interventions in HDM sensitized asthmatics; however, the results are inconsistent. In a systematic review of 54 studies, the authors concluded that HDM interventions did not significantly decrease asthma symptoms compared to control groups [5]. This systematic review included studies that focused on a single intervention. Woodcock et al. [6] found that using impermeable HDM bedding as a single intervention is ineffective because it does not reduce total HDM exposure. One of the studies in the systematic review conducted by Halken et al. [7] was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sixty children were randomized to receive either HDM impermeable encasings or sham encasings. The intervention group had a reduction in HDM levels which was associated with a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in a 1-year period [7]. However, these findings were not replicated in a study conducted by de Vries et al. [8].

More recently, Ghitany et al. [9] conducted a randomized control trial in Egypt with 160 asthmatic children sensitized to the HDM. The children were randomized into four groups: physical, chemical, both physical and chemical interventions, or no intervention. In the physical intervention group, there was an improvement in lung function and decreased hospitalizations in a 16-week period [9].

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for HDM

Although there have been few recently published studies that focus solely on HDM intervention, the evidence suggests that the most effective long-term strategy for HDM control is a comprehensive plan which includes cleaning regularly, washing and drying bedding weekly in high heat, using HDM impermeable encasings, maintaining humidity indoors below 50 %, and avoiding the use of carpet, upholstered furniture, and stuffed animals [2]. The more current approach to environmental remediation is multifaceted and targets multiple allergens. This is particularly important in children because they tend to be sensitized to more than one allergen [10]. We will discuss studies with more comprehensive approaches to environmental remediation at the end of this review.


The most common domestic animals include cats and dogs. Domestic animal allergies are common in atopic individuals. The primary cat allergen is Fel d 1, which is found in saliva, skin, and hair follicles. The major dog allergen is Can f 1, which is also found in saliva, skin, and hair follicles [2].

Cat allergen is carried on small particles, ranging from 2 to 10 microns, which allows it to remain airborne and become adherent to surfaces and clothing [11]. This allergen is found in dust samples taken from environments without cats, for example, in schools and daycares [12, 13••]. Wood et al. [14] found that after cat removal, it takes 20–24 weeks to reduce cat allergen levels in the indoor environment. After aggressive cleaning of the upholstered furniture, cat allergen decreases more rapidly [14]. Another potential reservoir of pet allergen is the mattress; thus, encasings are recommended as part of a comprehensive approach to reduce allergen levels. Regular washing of pets reduces allergen levels; however, the effects are not sustained. Washing cats demonstrated no benefit or transient benefit (not sustained beyond 1 week) [15, 16]. Hodson et. al. [17] reported, similarly, that dog washing reduced dog allergen levels; however, the results were short-lived unless the dog was washed twice a week.

There are few studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of pet allergen remediation in the treatment of asthma and allergies. In one study, excluding cats from the bedroom and using HEPA filters were found to be effective in reducing cat allergen levels; however, there was no reported improvement in asthma or allergic rhinitis symptoms [18]. Van der Heide et al. [19] conducted a 3-month HEPA filter intervention study in 20 pet-sensitized children with asthma. HEPA filter use, in the living room and bedroom, was associated with reduced airway hyper-responsiveness. However, more recently, Sulser et al. [20] conducted a similar study, over a 12-month period, and the results were not replicated; thus HEPA filter use is unlikely to improve symptoms and medication use for a sustained period of time.

Shirai et al. [21] conducted a study of 20 symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed pet allergic asthma. Ten of the 20 subjects had their pets removed from their homes. After 1-year follow up, none of the subjects in the pet removal group were on ICS compared to 9 subjects in the control group (p<.001) [21], which suggests that this is the most effective long-term strategy for environmental remediation. More recently, we have had to address issues pertaining to hypoallergenic pets. In the past two decades, many pet companies have marketed so called “hypoallergenic” pets. We have to stress to our patients and the public that there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of “hypoallergenic” pets [22, 23]. In a study conducted by Vredegoor et al. [24], higher Can f1 levels were found in hair and coat samples of hypoallergenic dog breeds compared to non-hypoallergenic dog breeds; however, there was no difference in dog allergen levels in settled dust and airborne samples between the two breeds.

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Pets

The American Academy of Allergy and Immunology (AAAAI) practice parameter for furry animals states hypoallergenic cats and dogs should not be recommended for sensitized individuals [23]. The most effective long-term strategy for environmental remediation in pet-sensitized individuals is to remove the pet from the home; however, individuals are often reluctant to remove their pets from the home. HEPA filter use may be beneficial, in pet-sensitized individuals who are unwilling to remove their pets from the home, because pet allergen may be airborne in these homes [25, 26].


The most common species of cockroach that cause sensitization are Blattella germanica (German cockroach) and Periplaneta americana (American cockroach). The major allergens are Bla g 1, Bla g 2, and Per a 1, which are found in saliva, secretions, debris, and fecal material [2]. There are regional differences in the prevalence of cockroach allergen. In Gary, Indiana, detectable levels of Bla g 1 allergen were found in 98 % kitchens in 101 apartments [27]. In New Orleans, Louisiana, cockroach allergen was found in 56.6 % of homes in moderate to high levels [28]. Cockroach infestation is associated with living in densely populated areas, urban environments, inner-city communities, and low socioeconomic status [29].

In 1997, cockroach was found to be the major allergen implicated in inner-city asthma exacerbations [30]. Gergen et al. [31] in the National Cooperative Inner City Asthma Study (NCICAS) demonstrated that using professional extermination with cockroach insecticide and directed education, in the homes of 265 asthmatic children, reduced cockroach allergen levels; however, the results were not sustained in a 12-month period. Sever et al. [32] found that results were more sustained when interventions were performed by academic entomologists compared to commercial companies.

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Cockroach

There are a variety of techniques used for abatement of pests. Pests and pest allergens are difficult to eliminate. The goal is to reduce pest allergen in an attempt to reduce pest-related asthma morbidity and allergy symptoms. These techniques involve short-term strategies and require long-term care to prevent re-infestation. Different strategies include education, cleaning regularly, plugging holes, using traps, and applying insecticides through professional extermination services. Strategies to repair structural defects include caulking, metal mesh, or expandable spray foams and gels. The above strategies, collectively, are termed integrated pest control (IPM) [29], and it is an effective and sustainable intervention to control cockroaches long term.


The major mouse allergens include Mus m 1 and Mus m 2, which are found in mouse urine, dander, and hair follicles [33]. Similar to cockroach, mouse infestations are more prevalent in urban and densely populated environments [29].

Exposure to mouse allergen is associated with a high rate of allergen sensitization [33]. High levels of mouse allergen, found in schools and homes, have been associated with increased asthma morbidity [34-37]. In the Northeastern US, Sheehan et al. [37] conducted a study examining the prevalence of mouse allergen in 4 inner-city schools. In schools with higher levels of mouse urinary protein, asthmatic students reported more asthma-related missed schools days [37]. Permaul et al. [13••, 38] examined allergen exposures in 29 inner-city schools and found children with asthma were exposed to high levels of mouse allergen. Mouse allergen levels were higher (generally greater than 0.5 μg/g) in the schools compared to homes. Predictors of mouse allergen in schools included visible droppings which were associated with higher mouse allergen levels in settled dust and air, particularly during the spring [38]. Matsui et al. [34] found that mouse allergen levels of greater than 0.5 μg/g, in the home of preschool inner-city asthmatics, were associated with increased asthma symptom days, medication use, and health care utilization.

Phipatanakul et al. [35] found that, in the NCICAS, 95% of the homes had detectable levels of mouse allergen; however, there was no statistically significant association between exposure, sensitization, and morbidity [36]. More recently, in Baltimore, Ahluwalia et al. [39••] conducted a study in the homes of 144 inner-city children with asthma. They found a high prevalence of both mouse and cockroach allergen exposure/sensitization; however, mouse allergen exposure/ sensitization contributed more to asthma morbidity.

IPM is an effective measure of reducing rodent infestation and rodent allergen levels. While most environmental remediation studies have focused on reducing cockroach allergen exposure in the inner-city, Phipatanakul et al. [40] performed a mouse allergen intervention using IPM in 18 homes of inner-city children with asthma. The IPM intervention entailed vacuuming, using low toxicity pesticides, traps, and sealing holes. These measures were associated with a mouse allergen reduction of 78.8 % in the kitchen (p=.02) and 77.3 % in the bedroom (p<.01) [40]. Pongracic et al. [41], from the Inner City Asthma Study (ICAS), performed IPM in the homes of children with asthma and found a reduction of mouse allergen in the bedroom which was associated with less sleep disruption and missed school days over a 12-month period, but there was no reduction in health care utilization [41]. However, in moderate to severe inner-city asthmatics, multi-faceted environmental remediation strategies were found to be cost-effective because of the associated reduction in health care utilization [42]. This suggests that IPM is an effective long-term strategy particularly when it is incorporated as part of a multifaceted approach to environmental remediation.

While associations between pest allergen exposure, sensitization, and asthma morbidity have been investigated in children, there are few studies in adults. Phipatanakul et al. [43] found that women in Boston, sensitized to mouse allergen, had greater than twice the odds of asthma diagnosis. In a New York City Public housing study, living in a senior citizen building and having a physician diagnosis of asthma were associated with high mouse allergen levels in the home [44].

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Mouse

In the AAAAI rodent practice parameters, Phipatanakul et al. [45] concluded the most effective strategies for abatement of rodents include preventing ingress, reducing clutter, and eliminating sources of food and shelter. Using bait, traps, and plugging cracks and holes are effective [29]. The use of rodenticides is not considered first-line treatment but it can be used if other interventions are ineffective; however, rodenticides should be applied by professional exterminators [45]. There is sufficient evidence to recommend IPM to reduce rodent allergen levels.


There are many species of mold, but common molds include Alternaria, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium [2]. Of all the molds, the most thoroughly investigated is Alternaria. In inner-city children with asthma, Alternaria sensitization has been associated with an increased risk of asthma-related hospitalization [4]. In the HEAL (Head off Environmental Asthma in Louisiana) study [46], the homes of 182 asthmatics were assessed for mold post-Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Most of the homes were damaged by flooding, rain water, or both. High levels of Alternaria were found, but other molds and allergens were not elevated; however, the authors speculated that this was likely due to thorough cleaning and other environmental remediation efforts performed post-Hurricane Katrina [46].

While many studies have focused on the home, a study conducted by Baxi et al. [47••] found that there was mold in 100 % of the 180 classrooms air samples collected from 12 inner-city schools. The amount of mold varied from classroom to classroom within the same school. The most commonly found species, at high concentrations, were Cladosporium (29.3±4.2 spores/m3), Penicillium/Aspergillus (15.0±5.4 spores/m3), smut spores (12.6±4.0 spores/m3), and basidio-spores (6.6±7.1 spores/ m3) [47••].

There are few studies that have examined the effect of mold remediation in the treatment of asthma and allergies. Lingell et al. [48] conducted an environmental remediation in a school in Finland with poor air quality and high levels of mold. After installing a ventilation and exhaust system, there were lower levels of mold but this was not associated with fewer respiratory complaints. Kercsmar et al. [49] studied mold remediation in the homes of 62 inner-city asthmatics. The intervention group had aggressive mold remediation which included repair of leaks, removal of water-damaged materials, ventilation alteration, and decreasing the humidity in damp basements. In this study, the asthmatics had fewer emergency rooms and hospitalizations after mold remediation compared to the control group. This study suggests that there may be a long-term benefit from a comprehensive plan to remediate mold and reduce asthma morbidity, but more studies are needed.

In a Cochrane review of mold remediation conducted by Sauni et al. [50] of 8 studies (6,538 participants) in homes, schools, and an office building, the authors found moderate evidence for remediation in both children and adults. In children, remediating homes was associated with decreased acute care visits. In adults, mold remediation in the homes was associated with decreased asthma symptoms. However, the interventions in these studies varied from cleaning only to extensive remediation; thus, it is difficult to make comparisons.

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Mold

More randomized control trials are needed to make a strong recommendation for extensive mold remediation. Extensive mold remediation is expensive and there is a lack of evidence to support its use in the treatment of asthma and allergies.

Environmental Tobacco Smoke

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is known to exacerbate asthma. In a cross-sectional study, using NHANES data, of 2,250 youths with asthma, 17.3 % reported using tobacco smoke products [51•]. Of the non-smokers, 53.2 % were exposed to second-hand smoke in their homes [51•]. Several intervention trials have targeted tobacco smoke cessation and reduction of second-hand smoke exposure in the home [52, 53, 54•, 55]. However, a Cochrane review found that most intervention studies aimed at reducing children’s ETS exposure were ineffective [56].

Since children may not be able to avoid second-hand smoke, the evidence suggests HEPA filters may be useful. Lanphear et al. [54•] conducted a double-blind randomized control trial of 215 asthmatic children with known second-hand tobacco smoke exposure. The intervention group received 2 HEPA filters and the control group received 2 sham air filters. In the intervention group, there was an 18.5 % reduction in the number of unscheduled asthma visits in a 12-month follow up period (185 visits vs. 227 visits; p=.043) [54•]. There were fewer airborne nicotine particles in the intervention group. Although there was a decrease in the amount of unscheduled visits, there was no difference in serum or hair cotinine between the two groups [54•]. This suggests that the use of HEPA filters may be a long-term effective strategy for reducing health care utilization in asthmatics who cannot avoid ETS.

There has been a recent body of literature published on the potential health hazards of third- hand smoke (THS) in children. THS is smoke pollutants remaining in the indoor environment and on surfaces after active tobacco smoking has ceased. Smoke pollutants include nicotine, formaldehyde, phenol, 3-ethenylpryidine, cresols, naphthalene, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines which can undergo physical and chemical transformations [57]. These smoke pollutants can persist for weeks to months on surfaces and in settled dust. Children are more vulnerable than adults to the potential hazardous effects of THS because of their behavioral habits which include crawling and ingesting non-food items [57]. Matt et al. [58] demonstrated that urine nicotine levels in infants were higher in the homes of smokers who smoked outside the home compared to infants in homes with non-smokers. This suggests that even smoking outside the home may be associated with adverse health effects in infants [58].

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for ETS

The most effective measure to control ETS is avoidance of second-hand smoke; however, more studies are needed to determine the adverse health effects of THS in children with asthma. If avoidance of second-smoke is impossible, then using a HEPA filter may be a beneficial and sustainable environmental intervention.


Endotoxin is a component found in the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria which is released after cell death [59]. Studies examining the associations between endotoxin and asthma are conflicting. Most of the studies focus on exposure to endotoxin and the development of asthma. In a study conducted by Sordillo et al. [60], dampness and visible water damage were associated with elevated endotoxin levels. Endotoxin levels were reduced by weekly cleaning of the home [60]. Chew [61] conducted a study measuring the levels of mold and endotoxin in homes post-Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. They found that thorough cleaning and disposing of damaged furnishings, and dry walls, maintaining cross-ventilation, and treating surfaces with a biostat agent reduced mold and endotoxin levels [61].

In a study conducted by Sheehan et al. [62••], endotoxin levels in both the schools and homes of inner-city children with asthma were measured. At each individual school, the median dust endotoxin concentration ranged from 6. to 24.0 EU/mg [62••]. The endotoxin levels in the classrooms were significantly higher compared to the matched samples obtained from the home bedrooms (mean log value=1.13 vs. 0.99, p=0.04) [62••].

More recently, a study conducted by Matsui et al. [63] found that the effects of airborne endotoxin on asthma were modified by co-exposure to airborne nicotine or nitrogen dioxide (NO2). In the homes of children without detectable nicotine levels, higher levels of endotoxin were associated with fewer acute care visits and less oral corticosteroid use; however, there was more acute care and more oral corticosteroid use if air nicotine levels were detected, and similar results were found for NO2 [63].

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Endotoxin

More studies are needed to determine the effect of endotoxin exposure on asthma and the role of endotoxin remediation on asthma morbidity.

Air Pollution

In the first 2 years of life, exposure to air pollutants has been associated with respiratory symptoms including cough and wheeze [64]. In childhood asthma, caregivers likely contribute to their child’s air pollution exposure. In a Chicago-based survey, 75 % of caregivers reported idling their cars while in the community [65]. Diette et al. [66] found that inner-city homes of children with asthma in Baltimore had higher levels of indoor NO2. The authors speculated that poorly ventilated gas stoves serve as the source of indoor NO2.

In a study conducted by Hansel et al. [67] of inner-city asthmatics, ages 2–6 years old, exposure to high levels of NO2 was associated with increased asthma symptoms including cough, limited speech, and nocturnal symptoms. In a study of 148 inner-city asthmatic children, Lu et al. [70] found being overweight or obese was associated with increased asthma symptoms when exposed to fine particulate matter (less that 2.5 μm) compared to those who were normal weight. In a double-blind crossover trial conducted by Marks et al. [71], exposure to low nitrogen oxide unflued gas heaters in school classrooms was associated with increased respiratory symptoms in atopic children compared to the use of non-indoor-air-emitting flued gas heaters [71].

In a study conducted in Korea, after reducing particulate matter and other air indoor air pollutants, there was an associated decrease in prevalence of atopic dermatitis and improvement in eczema area and severity index (EASI) [68]. In a study conducted by Du et al. [69], using HEPA filters reduced particulate matter by 69–80 % in the homes of children with asthma. This suggests that HEPA filter use may be an effective long term strategy to reduce indoor air pollution but more studies are needed.

Effective and Sustainable Interventions for Air Pollution

In a review on the effects of indoor pollution on inner-city asthmatics, the authors concluded that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that reducing indoor pollutants reduces asthma symptoms [72]. More studies are needed to determine the most effective control measures and strategies for reducing indoor air pollution and the effects of remediation on asthma Emorbidity and allergic diseases.

Multifaceted Intervention Programs

There have been few studies which examine the efficacy of multifaceted interventions in the treatment of asthma and allergies; however, based on the limited evidence available, these interventions are the most promising with regard to long-term benefit. Most children are sensitized to more than one allergen [10], and an environmental remediation approach that targets multiple allergens is an appropriate strategy. In the ICAS, Morgan et al. [73] reported a customized multi-allergen environmental intervention, based on positive skin-testing in asthmatic children, decreased asthma symptom days in the intervention group compared to the control group.

More recently, Breysse et al. [74] conducted a randomized control trial in Milwaukee to examine the impact of environmental remediation and nursing case management in the homes of asthmatics. The intervention included minor repairs of the home, thorough cleaning, and IPM. After the intervention, the control group had 72 % more total settled dust [74]. Although there was a decrease in settled dust in the intervention group, there was no significant difference in the concentration of allergens between the two groups [74].

The use of HEPA filters in targeted multifaceted interventions is effective. In an air filter review conducted by Sublett et al. [26], the authors concluded that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that air filtration decreases allergic respiratory disease progression. Air filtration is multifactorial and is impacted by the air filtering device, ventilation, source control, and humidity. The placement of an air filter in the home as a single intervention will not address the complex interactions that effect air quality and subsequent filtration [26].

In a systematic review of 23 multifaceted home environmental intervention studies in sensitized asthmatics, the authors concluded that these interventions in children were associated with decreased asthma morbidity as measured by asthma symptom days, asthma-related missed school days, and healthcare utilization; however, there were only 3 studies in adults included in the review [75••]. Thus, more studies are needed in adults.

Additionally, we need to conduct more studies in children to identify school-specific exposures that may contribute to asthma morbidity. Our group has an on-going study, the School Inner-City Allergen Study (SICAS), to comprehensively assess allergen exposures in both the school and home environments of inner-city asthmatics, and their associations with asthma morbidity [76]. In SICAS, there were higher allergen levels of mouse, cat, and dog in settled dust from schools compared to homes [13••]. This suggests that schools serve as an important source of environmental exposure for children which may influence asthma outcomes.


In the treatment of asthma and allergies, the most effective environmental remediation strategies are multifaceted interventions. This is particularly important in children because they are typically sensitized to more than one allergen [10]. There are fewer studies conducted in adults; thus, patterns of sensitization and the role of environmental remediation in adults are not well understood compared to children. Most trials have focused on children in an attempt to develop strategies to decrease disease progression or modify disease activity early in life. Although there are limited data in adults, the evidence suggests that multifaceted environmental interventions improve outcomes in children; thus, we recommend these interventions in children. However, more studies need to be conducted in adults. The most robust studies are multifaceted randomized, double–blind, placebo-controlled environmental intervention trials that examine composite outcomes which correlate objective data such as measured allergen levels with subjective and objective measures of patient outcomes. However, these studies are lacking in the literature.

One must devise a comprehensive environmental remediation strategy targeting multiple allergens based on sensitivities and exposures to effectively treat asthma and allergies. Based on the evidence available, the most effective control measures include education, thorough cleaning, use of HEPA filters, integrated pest management, and maintenance of these practices.


This work was funded in part by NIH/NIAID R-01grant AI-073964, R01AI073964-02S1, K24 AI 106822, and NIH/NHLBI grant 1U10HL098102.


Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Lakiea S. Wright and Wanda Phipatanakul declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

• Of major importance

1. Rao D, Phipatanakul W. Impact of environmental controls on childhood asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011;11(5):414–20. PMCID: PMC3166452. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Phipatanakul W. Environmental factors and childhood asthma. Pediatr Ann. 2006;35(9):646–56. [PubMed]
3. Sporik R, Holgate ST, Platts-Mills TA, Cogswell JJ. Exposure to house-dust mite allergen (Der p I) and the development of asthma in childhood. A prospective study. New Engl J Med. 1990;323(8):502–7. [PubMed]
4. Wang J, Visness CM, Calatroni A, Gergen PJ, Mitchell HE, Sampson HA. Effect of environmental allergen sensitization on asthma morbidity in inner-city asthmatic children. Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;39(9):1381–9. [PubMed]
5. Gotzsche PC, Johansen HK. House dust mite control measures for asthma: systematic review. Allergy. 2008;63(6):646–59. [PubMed]
6. Woodcock A, Forster L, Matthews E, Martin J, Letley L, Vickers M, et al. Control of exposure to mite allergen and allergen-impermeable bed covers for adults with asthma. New Engl J Med. 2003;349(3):225–36. [PubMed]
7. Halken S, Host A, Niklassen U, Hansen LG, Nielsen F, Pedersen S, et al. Effect of mattress and pillow encasings on children with asthma and house dust mite allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(1):169–76. [PubMed]
8. de Vries MP, van den Bemt L, Aretz K, Thoonen BP, Muris JW, Kester AD, Cloosterman S, van Schayck CP. House dust mite allergen avoidance and self-management in allergic patients with asthma: randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2007;57(536):184–90. PMCID: PMC2042544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. El-Ghitany EM, Abd El-Salam MM. Environmental intervention for house dust mite control in childhood bronchial asthma. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17(5):377–84. PMCID: PMC3437361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Arshad SH, Tariq SM, Matthews S, Hakim E. Sensitization to common allergens and its association with allergic disorders at age 4 years: a whole population birth cohort study. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E33. [PubMed]
11. de Blay F, Heymann PW, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA. Airborne dust mite allergens: comparison of group II allergens with group I mite allergen and cat-allergen Fel d I. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;88(6):919–26. [PubMed]
12. Instanes C, Hetland G, Berntsen S, Lovik M, Nafstad P. Allergens and endotoxin in settled dust from day-care centers and schools in Oslo, Norway. Indoor Air. 2005;15(5):356–62. [PubMed]
13••. Permaul P, Hoffman E, Fu C, Sheehan W, Baxi S, Gaffin J, Lane J, Bailey A, King E, Chapman M, Gold D, Phipatanakul W. Allergens in urban schools and homes of children with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Off Publ Eur Soci Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(6):543–9. PMCID: PMC3424376. This article highlights that, in addition to homes, schools are a major source of allergen exposure for children with asthma, particularly mouse allergen, and likely contribute to asthma morbidity. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Wood RA, Chapman MD, Adkinson NF, Jr, Eggleston PA. The effect of cat removal on allergen content in household-dust samples. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;83(4):730–4. [PubMed]
15. Klucka CV, Ownby DR, Green J, Zoratti E. Cat shedding of Fel d I is not reduced by washings, Allerpet-C spray, or acepromazine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95(6):1164–71. [PubMed]
16. Avner DB, Perzanowski MS, Platts-Mills TA, Woodfolk JA. Evaluation of different techniques for washing cats: quantitation of allergen removed from the cat and the effect on airborne Fel d 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100(3):307–12. [PubMed]
17. Hodson T, Custovic A, Simpson A, Chapman M, Woodcock A, Green R. Washing the dog reduces dog allergen levels, but the dog needs to be washed twice a week. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(4):581–5. [PubMed]
18. Wood RA, Johnson EF, Van Natta ML, Chen PH, Eggleston PA. A placebo-controlled trial of a HEPA air cleaner in the treatment of cat allergy. Am J respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(1):115–20. [PubMed]
19. van der Heide S, van Aalderen WM, Kauffman HF, Dubois AE, de Monchy JG. Clinical effects of air cleaners in homes of asthmatic children sensitized to pet allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(2 Pt 1):447–51. [PubMed]
20. Sulser C, Schulz G, Wagner P, Sommerfeld C, Keil T, Reich A, et al. Can the use of HEPA cleaners in homes of asthmatic children and adolescents sensitized to cat and dog allergens decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness and allergen contents in solid dust? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;148(1):23–30. [PubMed]
21. Shirai T, Matsui T, Suzuki K, Chida K. Effect of pet removal on pet allergic asthma. Chest. 2005;127(5):1565–71. [PubMed]
22. Butt A, Rashid D, Lockey RF. Do hypoallergenic cats and dogs exist? Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy, Asthma. Immunol. 2012;108(2):74–6. [PubMed]
23. Portnoy J, Kennedy K, Sublett J, Phipatanakul W, Matsui E, Barnes C, Grimes C, Miller JD, Seltzer CJM, Williams PB, Bernstein JA, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore UNJ, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang DM, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J. Environmental assessment and exposure control: a practice parameter-furry animals. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma, Immunol. 2012;108(4):223 e1–15. PMCID: PMC3519933. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Vredegoor DW, Willemse T, Chapman MD, Heederik DJ, Krop EJ. Can f 1 levels in hair and homes of different dog breeds: lack of evidence to describe any dog breed as hypoallergenic. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(4):904–9 e7. [PubMed]
25. Wood RA. Air filtration devices in the control of indoor allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2002;2(5):397–400. [PubMed]
26. Sublett JL, Seltzer J, Burkhead R, Williams PB, Wedner HJ, Phipatanakul W. Air filters and air cleaners: rostrum by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Indoor Allergen Committee. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(1):32–8. PMCID: PMC2824428. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Wang C, Abou El-Nour MM, Bennett GW. Survey of pest infestation, asthma, and allergy in low-income housing. J Community Health. 2008;33(1):31–9. [PubMed]
28. Rabito FA, Iqbal S, Holt E, Grimsley LF, Islam TM, Scott SK. Prevalence of indoor allergen exposures among New Orleans children with asthma. J Urban Health; bull NY Acad Med. 2007;84(6):782–92. PMCID: PMC2232043. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Sheehan WJ, Rangsithienchai PA, Wood RA, Rivard D, Chinratanapisit S, Perzanowski MS, Chew GL, Seltzer JM, Matsui EC, Phipatanakul W. Pest and allergen exposure and abatement in inner-city asthma: a work group report of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Indoor Allergy/Air Pollution Committee. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(3):575–81. PMCID: PMC2862381. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Rosenstreich DL, Eggleston P, Kattan M, Baker D, Slavin RG, Gergen P, et al. The role of cockroach allergy and exposure to cockroach allergen in causing morbidity among inner-city children with asthma. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(19):1356–63. [PubMed]
31. Gergen PJ, Mortimer KM, Eggleston PA, Rosenstreich D, Mitchell H, Ownby D, et al. Results of the National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study (NCICAS) environmental intervention to reduce cockroach allergen exposure in inner-city homes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(3 Pt 1):501–6. [PubMed]
32. Sever ML, Arbes SJ, Jr., Gore JC, Santangelo RG, Vaughn B, Mitchell H, Schal C, Zeldin DC. Cockroach allergen by cockroach control alone reduction in low-income urban homes: a randomized control trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(4):849–55. PMCID: PMC2804464. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Phipatanakul W. Rodent allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2002;2(5):412–6. [PubMed]
34. Matsui EC, Eggleston PA, Buckley TJ, Krishnan JA, Breysse PN, Rand CS, et al. Household mouse allergen exposure and asthma morbidity in inner-city preschool children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;97(4):514–20. [PubMed]
35. Phipatanakul W, Eggleston PA, Wright EC, Wood RA. Mouse allergen. I. The prevalence of mouse allergen in inner-city homes. The National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(6):1070–4. [PubMed]
36. Phipatanakul W, Eggleston PA, Wright EC, Wood RA. Mouse allergen. II. The relationship of mouse allergen exposure to mouse sensitization and asthma morbidity in inner-city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106(6):1075–80. [PubMed]
37. Sheehan WJ, Rangsithienchai PA, Muilenberg ML, Rogers CA, Lane JP, Ghaemghami J, Rivard DV, Otsu K, Hoffman EB, Israel E, Gold DR, Phipatanakul W. Mouse allergens in urban elementary schools and homes of children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;102(2):125–30. PMCID: 2658645. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Permaul P, Sheehan WJ, Baxi SN, Gaffin JM, Fu C, Petty CR, Gold DR, Phipatanakul W. Predictors of indoor exposure to mouse allergen in inner-city elementary schools. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111(4):299–301 e1. PMCID: PMC3783963. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39••. Ahluwalia SK, Peng RD, Breysse PN, Diette GB, Curtin-Brosnan J, Aloe C, Matsui EC. Mouse allergen is the major allergen of public health relevance in Baltimore City. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(4):830–5 e2. In inner-city asthma, both cockroach and mouse allergen sensitization and exposure increase asthma morbidity, but in this study, they found mouse contributes more to asthma morbidity. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Phipatanakul W, Cronin B, Wood RA, Eggleston PA, Shih MC, Song L, Tachdjian R, Oettgen HC. Effect of environmental intervention on mouse allergen levels in homes of inner-city Boston children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;92(4):420–5. PMCID: PMC1360245. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Pongracic JA, Visness CM, Gruchalla RS, Evans R, 3rd, Mitchell HE. Effect of mouse allergen and rodent environmental intervention on asthma in inner-city children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101(1):35–41. [PubMed]
42. Kattan M, Stearns SC, Crain EF, Stout JW, Gergen PJ, Evans R, 3rd, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a home-based environmental intervention for inner-city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116(5):1058–63. [PubMed]
43. Phipatanakul W, Litonjua AA, Platts-Mills TA, Naccara LM, Celedon JC, Abdulkerim H, Hoffman EB, Gold DR. Sensitization to mouse allergen and asthma and asthma morbidity among women in Boston. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(4):954–6. PMCID: PMC2243261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Chew GL, Carlton EJ, Kass D, Hernandez M, Clarke B, Tiven J, et al. Determinants of cockroach and mouse exposure and associations with asthma in families and elderly individuals living in New York City public housing. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;97(4):502–13. [PubMed]
45. Phipatanakul W, Matsui E, Portnoy J, Williams PB, Barnes C, Kennedy K, Bernstein D, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan D, Lang D, Nicklas R, Oppenheimer J, Randolph C, Schuller D, Spector S, Tilles SA, Wallace D, Sublett J, Bernstein J, Grimes C, Miller JD, Seltzer J. Environmental assessment and exposure reduction of rodents: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109(6):375–87. PMCID: PMC3519934. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Grimsley LF, Chulada PC, Kennedy S, White L, Wildfire J, Cohn RD, Mitchell H, Thornton E, El-Dahr J, Mvula MM, Sterling Y, Martin WJ, Stephens KU, Lichtveld M. Indoor environmental exposures for children with asthma enrolled in the HEAL study, post-Katrina New Orleans. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(11):1600–6. PMCID: PMC3556612. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47••. Baxi SN, Muilenberg ML, Rogers CA, Sheehan WJ, Gaffin J, Permaul P, Kopel LS, Lai PS, Lane JP, Bailey A, Petty CR, Fu C, Gold DR, Phipatanakul W. Exposures to molds in school classrooms of children with asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Off Publ Eur Soc Pediatr Allergy and Immunol. 2013;24(7):697–703. Common species of mold are highly prevalent in schools of children with asthma which may influence asthma morbidity. [PubMed]
48. Lignell U, Meklin T, Putus T, Rintala H, Vepsalainen A, Kalliokoski P, et al. Effects of moisture damage and renovation on microbial conditions and pupils’ health in two schools-a longitudinal analysis of five years. J Environ Monitoring: JEM. 2007;9(3):225–33. [PubMed]
49. Kercsmar CM, Dearborn DG, Schluchter M, Xue L, Kirchner HL, Sobolewski J, Greenberg SJ, Vesper SJ, Allan T. Reduction in asthma morbidity in children as a result of home remediation aimed at moisture sources. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(10):1574–80. PMCID: PMC1626393. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Sauni R, Uitti J, Jauhiainen UNM, Kreiss CK, Sigsgaard T, Verbeek JH. Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma (Review) Evid-based Child Health: a Cochrane Rev J. 2013;8(3):944–1000. [PubMed]
51•. Kit BK, Simon AE, Brody DJ, Akinbami LJ. US prevalence and trends in tobacco smoke exposure among children and adolescents with asthma. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):407–14. This article highlights the high prevalence of tobacco smoke product use in youths with asthma and the high prevalence of second-hand smoke exposure in the homes of non-smoking youths. [PubMed]
52. Butz AM, Matsui EC, Breysse P, Curtin-Brosnan J, Eggleston P, Diette G, et al. A randomized trial of air cleaners and a health coach to improve indoor air quality for inner-city children with asthma and secondhand smoke exposure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(8):741–8. [PubMed]
53. Hutchinson SG, Mesters I, van Breukelen G, Muris JW, Feron FJ, Hammond SK, van Schayck CP, Dompeling E. A motivational interviewing intervention to PREvent PAssive Smoke Exposure (PREPASE) in children with a high risk of asthma: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Publ Health. 2013;13:177. PMCID: PMC3599824. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54•. Lanphear BP, Hornung RW, Khoury J, Yolton K, Lierl M, Kalkbrenner A. Effects of HEPA air cleaners on unscheduled asthma visits and asthma symptoms for children exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):93–101. PMCID: PMC3010094. HEPA filters may be useful in reducing asthma morbidity in children with asthma who are exposed to second-hand smoke. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Wilson SR, Farber HJ, Knowles SB, Lavori PW. A randomized trial of parental behavioral counseling and cotinine feedback for lowering environmental tobacco smoke exposure in children with asthma: results of the LET’S Manage Asthma trial. Chest. 2011;139(3):581–90. PMCID: PMC3047287. [PubMed]
56. Priest N, Roseby R, Waters E, Polnay A, Campbell R, Spencer N, et al. Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4 CD001746. [PubMed]
57. Ferrante G, Simoni M, Cibella F, Ferrara F, Liotta G, Malizia V, et al. Third-hand smoke exposure and health hazards in children. Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace / Fondazione clinica del lavoro, IRCCS [and] Istituto di clinica tisiologica e malattie apparato respiratorio, Universita di Napoli. Secondo ateneo. 2013;79(1):38–43. [PubMed]
58. Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Hovell MF, Bernert JT, Song S, Novianti N, Juarez T, Floro J, Gehrman C, Garcia M, Larson S. Households contaminated by environmental tobacco smoke: sources of infant exposures. Tob Control. 2004;13(1):29–37. PMCID: PMC1747815. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Zhu Z, Oh SY, Zheng T, Kim YK. Immunomodulating effects of endotoxin in mouse models of allergic asthma. Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;40(4):536–46. [PubMed]
60. Sordillo JE, Alwis UK, Hoffman E, Gold DR, Milton DK. Home Dcharacteristics as predictors of bacterial and fungal microbial bio-markers in house dust. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(2):189–95. PMCID: PMC3040605. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Chew GL, Wilson J, Rabito FA, Grimsley F, Iqbal S, Reponen T, Muilenberg ML, Thorne PS, Dearborn DG, Morley RL. Mold and endotoxin levels in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: a pilot project of homes in New Orleans undergoing renovation. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(12):1883–9. PMCID: PMC1764149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62••. Sheehan WJ, Hoffman EB, Fu C, Baxi SN, Bailey A, King EM, Chapman MD, Lane JP, Gaffin JM, Permaul P, Gold DR, Phipatanakul W. Endotoxin exposure in inner-city schools and homes of children with asthma. Ann allergy, Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(6):418–22. PMCID: PMC3367391. This study is among the first of its kind, comparing endotoxin levels in the schools and homes of children with asthma. Endotoxin levels were higher in schools compared to homes. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
63. Matsui EC, Hansel NN, Aloe C, Schiltz AM, Peng RD, Rabinovitch N, Ong MJ, Williams DL, Breysse PN, Diette GB, Liu AH. Indoor Pollutant Exposures Modify the Effect of Airborne Endotoxin on Asthma in Urban Children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Morgenstern V, Zutavern A, Cyrys J, Brockow I, Gehring U, Koletzko S, Bauer CP, Reinhardt D, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J. Respiratory health and individual estimated exposure to traffic-related air pollutants in a cohort of young children. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(1):8–16. PMCID: PMC2092590. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Gupta RS, Ballesteros J, Springston EE, Smith B, Martin M, Wang E, Damitz M. The state of pediatric asthma in Chicago’s Humboldt Park: a community-based study in two local elementary schools. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10:45. PMCID: PMC2912879. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Diette GB, Hansel NN, Buckley TJ, Curtin-Brosnan J, Eggleston PA, Matsui EC, McCormack MC, Williams DL, Breysse PN. Home indoor pollutant exposures among inner-city children with and without asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(11):1665–9. PMCID: PMC2072822. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Hansel NN, Breysse PN, McCormack MC, Matsui EC, CurtinBrosnan J, Williams DL, Moore JL, Cuhran JL, Diette GB. A longitudinal study of indoor nitrogen dioxide levels and respiratory symptoms in inner-city children with asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(10):1428–32. PMCID: PMC2569107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Kim HO, Kim JH, Cho SI, Chung BY, Ahn IS, Lee CH, Park CW. Improvement of atopic dermatitis severity after reducing indoor air pollutants. Ann Dermatol. 2013;25(3):292–7. PMCID: PMC3756192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Du L, Batterman S, Parker E, Godwin C, Chin JY, O’Toole A, Robins T, Brakefield-Caldwell W, Lewis T. Particle Concentrations and Effectiveness of Free-Standing Air Filters in Bedrooms of Children with Asthma in Detroit, Michigan. Build Environ. 2011;46(11):2303–13. PMCID: PMC3161201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Lu KD, Breysse PN, Diette GB, Curtin-Brosnan J, Aloe C, Williams DL, Peng RD, McCormack MC, Matsui EC. Being overweight increases susceptibility to indoor pollutants among urban children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(4):1017–23. 23 e1-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
71. Marks GB, Ezz W, Aust N, Toelle BG, Xuan W, Belousova E, Cosgrove C, Jalaludin B, Smith WT. Respiratory health effects of exposure to low-NOx unflued gas heaters in the classroom: a double-blind, cluster-randomized, crossover study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(10):1476–82. PMCID: PMC2957932. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
72. Breysse PN, Diette GB, Matsui EC, Butz AM, Hansel NN, McCormack MC. Indoor air pollution and asthma in children. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010;7(2):102–6. PMCID: PMC3266016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
73. Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, O’Connor GT, Kattan M, Evans R, 3rd, et al. Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(11):1068–80. [PubMed]
74. Breysse J, Wendt J, Dixon S, Murphy A, Wilson J, Meurer J, Cohn J, Jacobs DE. Nurse case management and housing interventions reduce allergen exposures: the Milwaukee randomized controlled trial. Public health Rep. 2011;126(Suppl 1):89–99. (Washington, DC : 1974) PMCID: PMC3072907. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75••. Crocker DD, Kinyota S, Dumitru GG, Ligon CB, Herman EJ, Ferdinands JM, Hopkins DP, Lawrence BM, Sipe TA. Effectiveness of home-based, multi-trigger, multicomponent interventions with an environmental focus for reducing asthma morbidity: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2 Suppl 1):S5–32. This review focuses on multifaceted environmental interventions to reduce asthma morbidity, and highlights that most studies have been conducted in children. [PubMed]
76. Phipatanakul W, Bailey A, Hoffman EB, Sheehan WJ, Lane JP, Baxi S, Rao D, Permaul P, Gaffin JM, Rogers CA, Muilenberg ML, Gold DR. The school inner-city asthma study: design, methods, and lessons learned. J Asthma Off J Assoc Care Asthma. 2011;48(10):1007–14. PMCID: PMC3220801. [PMC free article] [PubMed]