Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
J Biol Chem. 2014 February 21; 289(8): 4743–4752.
Published online 2013 December 30. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M113.527473
PMCID: PMC3931036

Structural and Biochemical Basis for Ubiquitin Ligase Recruitment by Arrestin-related Domain-containing Protein-3 (ARRDC3)*


After protracted stimulation, the β2-adrenergic receptor and many other G-protein-coupled receptors are ubiquitinated and down-regulated. Arrestin-related domain-containing protein-3 (ARRDC3) has been proposed to recruit the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 to the β2-adrenergic receptor. ARRDC3 contains two PPXY motifs that could potentially interact with any of the four WW domains of Nedd4. Here we dissect the interaction determinants. ARRDC3 PPXY-Nedd4 WW dissociation constants vary from unmeasurable to Kd = 3 μm for the third WW domain of Nedd4 binding to the first PPXY motif of ARRDC3. Structures of the uncomplexed and PPXY1-bound WW3 domain were determined at 1.1 and 1.7 Å resolution. The structures revealed conformational changes upon binding and the hydrogen bonding network in exquisite detail. Tight packing of ARRDC3 Val-352′, part of a 310 helix at the C terminus of PPXY1, is important for high affinity binding to WW3. Although no single WW domain is strictly essential for the binding of Nedd4 and ARRDC3 expressed in HEK293 cells, high affinity binding of full-length ARRDC3 and Nedd4 is driven by the avid interaction of both PPXY motifs with either the WW2-WW3 or WW3-WW4 combinations, with Kd values as low as 300 nm.

Keywords: Arrestin, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry, Protein Crystallization, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin Ligase


In normal physiology no cell surface receptor remains indefinitely in an active signaling state. Various mechanisms turn receptor signals off, operating with differing kinetics (1). On short time scales, phosphorylation desensitizes active receptors (2). As long as the receptor remains at the cell surface and is not subjected to further post-translational modification, it can be quickly re-activated by dephosphorylation. In many cases, receptor activation and/or phosphorylation is followed by endocytosis (3). Receptor endocytosis, in turn, is often coupled to ubiquitination (4,6). Once endocytosed, ubiquitinated receptors may be recycled, or they may be targeted via the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) machinery for destruction in the lysosome (7). Thus multiple decision points determine whether the ultimate fate of activated receptors is rapid reactivation by dephosphorylation in situ, slower reactivation by recycling from endosomes to the plasma membrane, or degradation.

GPCR2 agonists and antagonists are among the largest single category of approved pharmaceuticals. The β2-adrenergic receptor in particular is a major drug target. Inhaled β2-adrenergic receptor agonists such as albuterol have been the primary treatment for asthma symptoms for decades. They continue to be used by millions of patients worldwide. In practice, the efficacy of these and other GPCR agonists as drugs is limited in part by the down-regulation of their receptors. The potential for the use of down-regulation inhibitors as potentiators of GPCR agonist potency and response duration is obvious. This study is motivated in part by the need to fill gaps in the basic structural mechanisms underlying β2-adrenergic receptor down-regulation.

The complex set of decisional nexa encountered by newly activated receptors highlight how critical the coupling to ubiquitin ligases is in this process. Although some transmembrane proteins, of which the epithelial sodium channel C-subunit (ENaC) is best known (8), have an intrinsic ability to couple to ubiquitin ligases, in most cases adaptor proteins are involved. The β and visual arrestin family has been intensively studied for more than two decades for its roles in GPCR desensitization (9) and has also been linked to GPCR ubiquitination (10). In the past five years it has become clear that a family of proteins containing arrestin homology domains (11), which includes six arrestin-related domain containing proteins (ARRDC1–5 and TXNIP) in humans and the arrestin-related transport proteins in yeast (12), has important roles in targeting Nedd4-family ubiquitin ligases to receptors. These arrestin-related proteins seem in many cases to target their substrates for degradation. In particular, ARRDC3 has been proposed to have a major role in the down-regulation of β2-adrenergic receptor in mice and in human cells (13, 14, 36), although contradictory observations have been reported (15).

The human proteome includes nine members of the Nedd4 ubiquitin ligase family (16). Nedd4 family members consist of an N-terminal membrane binding C2 domain, two to four WW domains with connecting linkers, and a C-terminal ubiquitin ligase HECT domain. The paradigmatic Nedd4 family reaction in human cells is the ubiquitination of the ENaC α, β, and γ subunits by Nedd4-2 (8). Nedd4-2 binds to PPXY motifs at the C-termini of the subunits of ENaC via its WW domains.

WW domains consist of ~40 amino acid residues, which fold into a three-stranded antiparallel β-sheet. The WW domain is one of the most compact of all autonomously folded domains (17). WW domains are so-named for their two conserved tryptophan residues. WW domains are widespread in proteins involved in apoptosis, transcription, RNA splicing, and ubiquitination among others (18). Most WW domains bind Pro-containing peptide sequences, but the details of their specificity vary. WW domains have been divided into five groups based on their preference for binding different types of Pro-rich motifs (18). The WW domains of group I have a consensus interaction motif as follows: (L/P)PX(Y/pY), where pY is phosphotyrosine. The four WW domains of Nedd4 belong to this group.

Solution NMR analyses of Nedd4 WW domain bound to PPXY peptides from ENaC (19, 20) provided the prototypical structural studies how Nedd4-family enzymes bind their substrates. Budding yeast contains just one Nedd4 ortholog, Rsp5. A recent structure of a large portion of Rsp5 bound to a PPXY-containing substrate, Sna3, showed how PPXY binding and ubiquitination are coordinated in three dimensions (21). Human ARRDC proteins and yeast arrestin-related transports contain PPXY motifs as one of their defining features. The natural hypothesis is that the ARRDCs bind to WW domains of Nedd4 ligases in the same way as substrates. However, no structural or quantitative biochemical data have been available to test this hypothesis or to understand the relative contributions of the various WW domains and PPXY motifs in this system. As part of a larger effort to understand how ARRDC3 and other ARRDCs might direct the ubiquitination and down-regulation of the β2-adrenergic receptor and other GPCRs, here we report a quantitative biochemical and atomic resolution structural dissection of the ARRDC3-Nedd4 interaction.


Expression and Purification of ARRDC3 and Nedd4 Fragments

All four WW domains of human Nedd4 and the WW2-3 and WW3-4 tandem constructs were subcloned into the pGST-parallel2 vector (22). These constructs span the following residues of Nedd4: WW1, 186–230; WW2, 346–386; WW3, 416–455; WW4, 467–508 (Fig. 1, A and B). The C-terminal tail fragment of ARRDC3 containing two PPXY motifs (Fig. 1, A and B) and spanning residues 341′–400′ (where the prime (′) denotes residues of ARRDC3) was cloned into pMBP-parallel2 (22). The WW domains and ARRDC3 C-terminal tail were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21-gold (DE3) cells (Agilent Technologies). After induction with 0.2 mm isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside overnight at 16 °C, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min. Cell pellets were lysed by sonication in 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 0.5 mm Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine-HCl, and 1 mm PMSF. The lysate was centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. For WW domain preparations, the supernatant was bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin (GE Healthcare). The eluted protein was further purified on a Hi Trap Q HP column. Peak fractions were pooled and digested with tobacco etch virus protease overnight at 4 °C. This material was incubated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin for 0.5 h to remove His6-tobacco etch virus protease. The sample was then applied to Superdex 75 16/60 column equilibrated with 150 mm NaCl, 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0.

Domain structure of Nedd4 and ARRDC3. A, schematic diagram of the domain structures of human Nedd4 and ARRDC3. Nedd4 consists of a C2 domain (cyan), four WW domains (green), and a HECT ubiquitin ligase domain (blue). ARRDC3 consists of an N-terminal arrestin ...

For preparation of the ARRDC3 C-terminal tail construct, the supernatant was bound to nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin. The eluted protein was further purified on a Hi Trap Q HP column and a Superdex 200 16/60 column. The elution peaks were pooled and flash-frozen in liquid N2.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Binding constants of the four WW domains of Nedd4–1 for the two PPXY motifs of ARRDC3 were measured using a MircoCal iTC200 system (GE Healthcare) at 25 °C. The purified WW domains were dialyzed overnight against 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.3, 150 mm NaCl. PPXY motif peptides (PPXY1, 341′-355′; PPXY2, 384′-399′) (New England Peptide) were dissolved into double-distilled water and adjusted to pH 7.0 with NaOH. The peptide solution was diluted to 1 mm using the WW domain dialysis buffer. 1.0 mm PPXY peptide solution was injected into a cell containing 0.1 mm WW domain. PPXY peptide samples were injected into dialysis buffer as a control. The curves were analyzed with Origin. Protein and peptide concentrations were determined by UV absorption across the 260–280-nm spectrum.


Nedd4-WW3 was concentrated to 20 mg/ml. Crystals were grown by hanging-drop vapor diffusion at 21 °C. To generate apoWW3 crystals, the WW3 solution was mixed with well buffer composed of 3.0 m NaCl, 100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, at a 1:1 ratio. Crystals appeared with 24 h and grew to full size after 2 days. Crystals were flash-frozen with liquid N2 in a cryoprotectant of 20% glycerol, 3.0 m NaCl, 100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. For crystallization of the WW3-PPXY1 complex, WW3 was mixed with PPXY1 peptide at a 1:3 molar ratio and incubated on ice for ~30 min. The complex crystals were grown in 0.35 m (NH4)2SO4, 100 mm Tris-HCl 8.0, and 100 mm guanidine-HCl. Complex crystals appeared and grew to full size within 24 h. The crystals were flash-frozen with liquid N2 in a cryoprotectant solution of 20% glycerol, 0.35 m (NH4)2SO4, 100 mm Tris-HCl 8.0, 100 mm guanidine-HCl.

Diffraction data were collected at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) beamline 22-ID. Data were processed with HKL2000 software (HKL Research). Data collection and processing statistics are given in Table 1. The WW3 apo structure was solved by a molecular replacement method using PDB coordinates 2HO2 A chain (human Fe65-WW domain as bound to a peptide from hMena (23)) as the search model. Molecular replacement was carried out with the program BALBES (24). The complex structure was solved by molecular replacement method with PHASER (25) using the WW3 apo structure as a search model. Model building and refinement were carried out with ccp4 (26), COOT (27), REFMAC5 (28), Phenix (29), and ARP/wARP (30).

Statistics of crystallographic data collection and refinement


The pCR3.1 YFP-ARRDC3 and p3×FLAG CMV26 myc-Nedd4 plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. Martin-Serrano (King's College) and Dr. Fadila Bouamr (National Institutes of Health), respectively. Mutations in the 3×FLAG CMV26 myc Nedd4 plasmid were prepared by site-directed mutagenesis and confirmed by DNA sequence analysis (NIDCR shared resource facility). Mutations included W219A in the WW1 domain, W376A in the WW2 domain, W449A in the WW3 domain, W501A in the WW4 domain, and combinations of two, three, or all four mutations. For immunoprecipitation, 1 μg of YFP-ARRDC3 and 1 μg of 3×FLAG Nedd4 plasmid were co-transfected into HEK293 cells in 6-well plates using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested with 300 μl of lysis buffer composed of 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mm NaCl, and 1% Triton X-100 and clarified for 10 min at 15,000 × g at 4 °C. A fraction of lysate (50 μl) was saved for input lysate, and the remaining lysate was used for immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG M2 affinity beads (Sigma) and rotated for 3 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed 3 times with Tris-buffered saline and eluted with sample buffer. Lysates were run on 10% SDS-PAGE gels for Western blot analysis. ARRDC3 antibody was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA), FLAG antibody was purchased from Sigma, and all other antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA).


WW3 Has the Highest Affinity for PPXY Motifs of ARRDC3

To quantitatively determine how ARRDC3 recruits Nedd4, we performed isothermal titration calorimetry. Each of the four independent WW domains was prepared as a recombinant protein and purified. Peptides were synthesized corresponding to the two PPXY motifs of ARRDC3. The peptides PPXY1 and PPXY2 correspond to ARRDC3 residues 341′–355′ and 384′–400′, respectively.

The WW domains have affinities in the rank order WW3 > WW4 ~ WW2 [dbl greater-than sign] WW1 (Fig. 2, A and B). WW3 binds to both PPXY1 and PPXY2 the most tightly of the four WW domains, with Kd values of 3.3 ± 0.4 and 19 ± 3 μm, respectively. WW1 binds with both PPXY motifs weakly, with Kd values that could not be quantitated accurately, but exceed 100 μm. WW2 and WW4 bind PPXY1 with intermediate affinity and bind PPXY2 weakly. A consistent trend is apparent in which PPXY1 binds severalfold more tightly than PPXY2 to all three of the WW domains where the affinities were high enough to measure.

Isothermal titration calorimetry of individual Nedd4 WW domains and ARRDC3 PPXY motifs. A, the isothermal titration of PPXY1 to WW3 is shown as representative raw data. B, summary of the binding affinities of each combination of individual WW domains ...

Crystal Structure of the WW3-PPXY1 Complex

To understand the structural basis for the highest affinity interaction in the system, the Nedd4 WW3 domain was co-crystallized in complex with the PPXY1 peptide, and the structure was determined at 1.7 Å resolution (Table 1, Fig. 3, A and B). The PPXY1 peptide residues 344′–348′ are in a type II polyproline conformation (Fig. 4A), with [var phi] angles ranging from −56 to −81 and ψ angles from 142 to 166 degrees. Residues 349′–352′ are in the 310-helical conformation. Residues 348′ and 349′ both participate in i to i+3 hydrogen bonds with residues 351′ and 352′, respectively (Fig. 4B). The peptide buries a total of 378 Å2 surface area.

Structure of the WW3-PPXY1 complex. A, overall structure of WW3-PPXY1 complex. The key residues of the PPXY1 peptide are shown as sticks. Carbon atoms of the WW3 domain are colored dark green, and those of the PPXY1 peptide are colored yellow. Nitrogen ...
Structural interactions in the WW3-PPXY1 complex. A, schematic model of the PPXY1 motif showing the key Pro residues in the type II polyproline conformation. B, the intrapeptide hydrogen bonds that help stabilize the PPXY1 conformation are show as magenta. ...

The type II polyproline conformation of the N-terminal region is stabilized by the packing of the two Pro of PPXY1 peptide, Pro-346′ and Pro-347′, against Trp-449 and Phe-438, respectively (Fig. 4C). Two hydrogen bonds between WW3 side chains and the peptide backbone also contribute to binding and stabilization of this conformation (Fig. 4D). The first is formed between the carbonyl of Glu-344′ of the PPXY1 peptide and the indole nitrogen of Trp-449. A second peptide main chain hydrogen bond is formed between the carbonyl of Pro-347′ and the side chain hydroxyl of Thr-447.

The 310 helical segment spanning Tyr-349′ to Val-352′ packs such that the Tyr and Val side chains contact a hydrophobic groove comprised of Phe-348, Ile-440, and the hydrocarbon portions of Lys-445 and Thr-447 of the WW domain (Fig. 4E). In particular, the side-chain methyl groups of Val-352′ are tightly packed and almost completely buried between the Tyr-349′ side chain and the above-mentioned WW domain residues (Fig. 4E). This region is also stabilized by a direct hydrogen bond between the phenolic hydroxyl of Tyr-349′ and the imidazole Nδ of His-442. The type II polyproline and 310 helical segments mutually stabilize one another via a hydrogen bond between the main-chain amide of Ser-348′ and the side chain of Glu-351′.

Induced Fit upon PPXY1 Binding to WW3

To understand whether changes in the conformation or dynamics of WW3 are important for binding to PPXY1, we determined the structure of the uncomplexed (apo) WW3 and compared it to the complex described above. The apo domain crystals diffracted to 1.1 Å resolution, allowing a true atomic resolution analysis including positions of hydrogen atoms and alternative conformations of side chains. There are two molecules per asymmetric unit in the apo structure. As compared with the complexed structure, the β2-β3 turn (residues 442–445) in one of the two chains (A) is highly mobile. B-factors in this region of the A chain reach 200 Å2, as compared with an average of 25 Å2 for the entire structure.

The main structural changes upon PPXY1 binding are as follows. The guanidine group of Arg-430 moves by 3 Å to make room for the side chain of Val-352′ (Fig. 5, A and B). Atoms of Ile-440 also move by up to 3 Å as its side chain χ1 switches from +61º to −66º. This shift in the Ile-440 side chain helps create the Val-352′ binding pocket. It has a second important consequence in facilitating a change in rotamer of Thr-447. The Thr-447 side chain χ1 dihedral angle changes from −60º to +60º upon peptide binding. The χ1 = +60º conformation would have been sterically disallowed in the apo structure because of a close contact between the Ile Cγ2 and the Thr Cγ atoms. The conformational change in the Thr side chain is very important for peptide binding because it contributes its hydroxyl group to donate a hydrogen bond to Pro-347′ as described above. Thus an elegant set of coupled repacking interactions connects formation of the Val-352′ binding pocket for the C-terminal part of the peptide to formation of a key hydrogen bond with the N-terminal part of the peptide (Fig. 5C).

Induced fit in PPXY1 binding to WW3. A, three-dimensional superposition of the WW3 apo and WW3-PPXY1 complex structures in the vicinity of the Val-352′ binding pocket. Yellow, residues from PPXY1; dark green, WW3 from WW3-PPXY1 complex; orange ...

Basis for Affinity Differences between PPXY1 and PPXY2

To explore whether the tight packing of Val at the +3 position of PPXY1 contributes to its higher affinity as compared with PPXY2, where Val is replaced by Ile (Figs. 1 and and6A),6A), a V352I peptide was prepared. The Kd of WW3 domain and PPXY1 V352I was 8.7 ± 0.8 μm, a roughly 2-fold reduction compared with wild-type PPXY1 (Fig. 6B). The Val thus contributes to the high affinity but does not fully account for it.

Isothermal titration calorimetry of V352′I. A, a model for the mutation of Val-352′ to Ile. In the absence of structural relaxation, this mutation would introduce a steric collision, highlighted with a star. The residues of wild type WW3-PP ...

Co-immunoprecipitations Are Robust to Mutation of Single WW Domains

A co-immunoprecipitation assay of YFP-ARRDC3 and FLAG-tagged Nedd4 demonstrated a robust interaction between these two proteins (Fig. 7A). Mutation of the WW3 domain (W449A) alone reduced association by roughly 2-fold. However, mutation of WW3 in combination with the WW2 (W376A) or WW4 (W501A) domains more significantly reduced the interaction with ARRDC3 (Fig. 7, A and B). Furthermore, mutation of the tryptophan residues of WW2, WW3, and WW4 (and of all four WW domains) completely abolished the co-immunoprecipitation, thus indicating the WW2, WW3, and WW4 domains of Nedd4 are required for interaction with ARRDC3.

Co-immunoprecipitation of Nedd4 WW mutants and ARRDC3. A co-immunoprecipitation assay was performed by co-transfecting YFP-ARRDC3 and 3× FLAG-tagged Nedd4 mutant (M1–M5) or WT plasmids into HEK293 cells. A, lysates were immunoprecipitated ...

Tandem WW Domains Have Very High Affinity for C-terminal Domain of ARRDC3

We sought to understand how the lower affinity interactions of the other three WW domains complement the high affinity binding of PPXY1 to WW3. Tandem constructs were generated that included the WW2-3 and WW3-4 pairs, and both PPXY motifs and their affinities were measured by isothermal titration calorimetry. These constructs bound with Kd values of 510 and 300 nm, respectively (Fig. 8).

Tandem Nedd4 WW domains have very high affinity for the tandem ARRDC3 PPXY motifs. Shown are isothermal titration calorimetry of the WW2-3 (A) and WW3-4 pair (B) with a construct of the ARRDC3 tail containing both PPXY motifs.


Our findings highlight the parallelism between the ARRDCs and PPXY-containing Nedd4 substrates. It appears that ARRDCs and arrestin-related transports likely evolved their Nedd4 family recruitment activity by recapitulating the same recognition principles used by Nedd4 substrates. As with the direct Nedd4 substrate ENaC (31,33), WW3 represents a focal point of affinity for ARRDC3. The WW3-PPXY1 complex resembles the ENaC β subunit complex (19) in the recognition of core PPXY residues. Indeed, these elements are shared in common by other group I WW-peptide complex structures (17, 21, 34).

The structural details that underpin the high affinity of the ARRDC3 PPXY1 interaction with WW3 appear on their surface to differ from the ENaC β subunit peptide complex. The PPXY motif of the ENaC β subunit forms what is described by the authors (19) as a single turn of α-helix C-terminal to the Tyr. The final residue of this single turn helix is a Leu-621′, three residues after the Tyr. The side chain of Leu-621′ contributes most of the additional buried surface area in the ENaC β subunit complex. The ARRDC3 PPXY1 motif also uses a C-terminal extension to bolster affinity. For the ARRDC3 motif, a 310 helix at the end of the ARRDC3 PPXY1 motif replaces the ENaC β subunit α-helix. Val-352′ of ARRDC3 binds to a similar hydrophobic surface region as Leu-621 of ENaC-β. There are no other amino acid residue differences in surrounding regions of these two peptides that can readily explain the differences in the conformations. It seems worth considering that the correct structure of this portion of the ENaC-β is actually a 310 helix, with the apparent discrepancies due to differences in the resolution of the x-ray crystallographic and NMR analyses.

The role of induced fit in Pro-rich motif recognition has been little discussed but was highlighted in a recent analysis of Nedd4 WW3 binding to ENaC α subunit (35). This report found that the β2-β3 turn was highly dynamic in the absence of peptide binding. This observation is consistent with the disorder in the same turn in one of the two copies present in the crystallographic asymmetric unit. The present pair of bound and unbound structures illuminates additional details that would have been difficult to detect in structures at less than atomic resolution. We observed an elegant interconnection between hydrophobic repacking at one site with hydrogen bond formation at an adjacent site. Repacking around the key Val-352′ side chain forces a change in rotamer for Thr-447. This is, in turn, essential for Thr side-chain hydrogen bonding to the type II polyproline segment. This previously unappreciated induced fit mechanism may contribute to the specificity of the WW3 for PPXY motifs with a hydrophobic residue three positions C-terminal to the Tyr.

The finding that PPXY1 has the highest affinity for Nedd4 WW domains in vitro is consistent with the finding that PPXY1 is also the more important of the two PPXY motifs for Nedd4 recruitment (13). Our observation that the interaction between Nedd4 and ARRDC3 persists to at least some extent in the WW3-inactivated mutant is consistent with the previous finding that the interaction survives deletion of either PPXY motif individually (13). This interaction seems to be important enough that is has been “over-engineered,” at least when using overexpressed proteins as done in our experimental conditions and those of Nabhan et al. (13).

Nevertheless, the interaction between Nedd4 and ARRDC3 could be inhibited by disrupting multiple PPXY-WW domain interactions. Because Nedd4 contributes to the ubiquitination and down-modulation of β2-adrenergic receptor, blocking Nedd4-ARRDC3 interactions could potentially provide an opportunity for potentiating and prolonging β2-adrenergic receptor signaling, which is particularly relevant for effective treatment of asthma.


We thank J. Martin-Serrano and F. Bouamr for DNA constructs. We thank M. Ragusa for experimental advice. Crystallographic data were collected at the SE Regional Collaborative Access Team 22-ID and 22-BM beamlines at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the United States Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38 and was supported by the United States Department of Energy Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.

*This work was supported by the American Asthma Foundation (to J. H. H. and J. S. G.). This work was also supported, in part, by intramural programs of the NIDDK and NIDCR, National Institutes of Health (to J. H. H. and J. S. G., respectively).

2The abbreviations used are:

G-protein-coupled receptor
arrestin-related domain-containing protein-3
epithelial sodium channel C-subunit.


1. Marchese A., Chen C., Kim Y. M., Benovic J. L. (2003) The ins and outs of G protein-coupled receptor trafficking. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 369–376 [PubMed]
2. Gainetdinov R. R., Premont R. T., Bohn L. M., Lefkowitz R. J., Caron M. G. (2004) Desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors and neuronal functions. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 107–144 [PubMed]
3. Wolfe B. L., Trejo J. (2007) Clathrin-dependent mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis. Traffic 8, 462–470 [PubMed]
4. Polo S., Pece S., Di Fiore P. P. (2004) Endocytosis and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 156–161 [PubMed]
5. Hurley J. H., Stenmark H. (2011) Molecular mechanisms of ubiquitin-dependent membrane traffic. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 40, 119–142 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Hislop J. N., von Zastrow M. (2011) Role of ubiquitination in endocytic trafficking of G-protein-coupled receptors. Traffic 12, 137–148 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Katzmann D. J., Odorizzi G., Emr S. D. (2002) Receptor down-regulation and multivesicular-body sorting. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 893–905 [PubMed]
8. Staub O., Gautschi I., Ishikawa T., Breitschopf K., Ciechanover A., Schild L., Rotin D. (1997) Regulation of stability and function of the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) by ubiquitination. EMBO J. 16, 6325–6336 [PubMed]
9. Shenoy S. K., Lefkowitz R. J. (2011) β-Arrestin-mediated receptor trafficking and signal transduction. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 32, 521–533 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Shenoy S. K., Xiao K., Venkataramanan V., Snyder P. M., Freedman N. J., Weissman A. M. (2008) Nedd4 mediates agonist-dependent ubiquitination, lysosomal targeting, and degradation of the β2-adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 22166–22176 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Alvarez C. E. (2008) On the origins of arrestin and rhodopsin. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Lin C. H., MacGurn J. A., Chu T., Stefan C. J., Emr S. D. (2008) Arrestin-related ubiquitin-ligase adaptors regulate endocytosis and protein turnover at the cell surface. Cell 135, 714–725 [PubMed]
13. Nabhan J. F., Pan H., Lu Q. (2010) Arrestin domain-containing protein 3 recruits the NEDD4 E3 ligase to mediate ubiquitination of the β2-adrenergic receptor. EMBO Rep. 11, 605–611 [PubMed]
14. Patwari P., Emilsson V., Schadt E. E., Chutkow W. A., Lee S., Marsili A., Zhang Y., Dobrin R., Cohen D. E., Larsen P. R., Zavacki A. M., Fong L. G., Young S. G., Lee R. T. (2011) The arrestin domain-containing 3 protein regulates body mass and energy expenditure. Cell Metab. 14, 671–683 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Han S. O., Kommaddi R. P., Shenoy S. K. (2013) Distinct roles for β-arrestin2 and arrestin domain-containing proteins in β2 adrenergic receptor trafficking. EMBO Rep. 14, 164–171 [PubMed]
16. Ingham R. J., Gish G., Pawson T. (2004) The Nedd4 family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Functional diversity within a common modular architecture. Oncogene 23, 1972–1984 [PubMed]
17. Macias M. J., Hyvönen M., Baraldi E., Schultz J., Sudol M., Saraste M., Oschkinat H. (1996) Structure of the WW domain of a kinase-associated protein complexed with a proline-rich peptide. Nature 382, 646–649 [PubMed]
18. Macias M. J., Wiesner S., Sudol M. (2002) WW and SH3 domains, two different scaffolds to recognize proline-rich ligands. FEBS Lett. 513, 30–37 [PubMed]
19. Kanelis V., Rotin D., Forman-Kay J. D. (2001) Solution structure of a Nedd4 WW domain-ENaC peptide complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 407–412 [PubMed]
20. Kanelis V., Bruce M. C., Skrynnikov N. R., Rotin D., Forman-Kay J. D. (2006) Structural determinants for high-affinity binding in a Nedd4 WW3* domain-Comm PY motif complex. Structure 14, 543–553 [PubMed]
21. Kamadurai H. B., Qiu Y., Deng A., Harrison J. S., Macdonald C., Actis M., Rodrigues P., Miller D. J., Souphron J., Lewis S. M., Kurinov I., Fujii N., Hammel M., Piper R., Kuhlman B., Schulman B. A. (2013) Mechanism of ubiquitin ligation and lysine prioritization by a HECT E3. eLife 2:e00828. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Sheffield P., Garrard S., Derewenda Z. (1999) Overcoming expression and purification problems of RhoGDI using a family of “parallel” expression vectors. Protein Expr. Purif. 15, 34–39 [PubMed]
23. Meiyappan M., Birrane G., Ladias J. A. (2007) Structural basis for polyproline recognition by the FE65 WW domain. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 970–980 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Long F., Vagin A. A., Young P., Murshudov G. N. (2008) BALBES. A molecular-replacement pipeline. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 64, 125–132 [PubMed]
25. McCoy A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Adams P. D., Winn M. D., Storoni L. C., Read R. J. (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 [PubMed]
26. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994) The CCP4 suite. Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760–763 [PubMed]
27. Emsley P., Cowtan K. (2004) Coot. model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 [PubMed]
28. Murshudov G. N., Vagin A. A., Dodson E. J. (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240–255 [PubMed]
29. Adams P. D., Afonine P. V., Bunkóczi G., Chen V. B., Davis I. W., Echols N., Headd J. J., Hung L. W., Kapral G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., McCoy A. J., Moriarty N. W., Oeffner R., Read R. J., Richardson D. C., Richardson J. S., Terwilliger T. C., Zwart P. H. (2010) PHENIX. A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Perrakis A., Morris R., Lamzin V. S. (1999) Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463 [PubMed]
31. Lott J. S., Coddington-Lawson S. J., Teesdale-Spittle P. H., McDonald F. J. (2002) A single WW domain is the predominant mediator of the interaction between the human ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4 and the human epithelial sodium channel. Biochem. J. 361, 481–488 [PubMed]
32. Fotia A. B., Dinudom A., Shearwin K. E., Koch J.-P., Korbmacher C., Cook D. I., Kumar S. (2003) The role of individual Nedd4-2 (KIAA0439) WW domains in binding and regulating epithelial sodium channels. FASEB J. 17, 70–72 [PubMed]
33. Henry P. C., Kanelis V., O'Brien M. C., Kim B., Gautschi I., Forman-Kay J., Schild L., Rotin D. (2003) Affinity and specificity of interactions between Nedd4 isoforms and the epithelial Na+ channel. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 20019–20028 [PubMed]
34. Huang X., Poy F., Zhang R., Joachimiak A., Sudol M., Eck M. J. (2000) Structure of a WW domain containing fragment of dystrophin in complex with β-dystroglycan. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 634–638 [PubMed]
35. Bobby R., Medini K., Neudecker P., Lee T. V., Brimble M. A., McDonald F. J., Lott J. S., Dingley A. J. (2013) Structure and dynamics of human Nedd4–1 WW3 in complex with the α ENaC PY motif. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1834, 1632–1641 [PubMed]
36. Shea F. F., Rowell J. L., Li Y., Chang T. H., Alvarez C. E. (2012) Mammalian alpha arrestins link activated transmembrane receptors to Nedd4 family E3 ubiquitin ligases and interact with beta arrestins. PLOS One 7, e50557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology