PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Diabetes Care. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 26, 2014.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3902103
NIHMSID: NIHMS403053
Pesticide Exposure and Self-Reported Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Agricultural Health Study
Tina M. Saldana, PHD,1 Olga Basso, PHD,1 Jane A. Hoppin, SCD,1 Donna D. Baird, PHD,1 Charles Knott, MPA,2 Aaron Blair, PHD,3 Michael C.R. Alavanja, DRPH,3 and Dale P. Sandler, PHD1
1Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
2Battelle Memorial Institute, Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation, Durham, North Carolina
3Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tina Saldana, Post-doctoral Fellow, Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. saldana/at/niehs.nih.gov
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between pesticide use during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among wives of licensed pesticide applicators.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Using data from the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), we estimated the association between self-reported pesticide-related activities during the first trimester of the most recent pregnancy and GDM among 11,273 women whose pregnancy occurred within 25 years of enrollment.
RESULTS
A total of 506 (4.5%) women reported having had GDM. Women who reported agricultural pesticide exposure (mixing or applying pesticides to crops or repairing pesticide application equipment) during pregnancy were more likely to report GDM (odds ratio [OR] 2.2 [95% CI 1.5–3.3]). We saw no association between residential pesticide exposure (applying pesticides in the home and garden during pregnancy) and GDM (1.0 [0.8–1.3]). Among women who reported agricultural exposure during pregnancy, risk of GDM was associated with ever-use of four herbicides (2,4,5-T; 2,4,5-TP; atrazine; or butylate) and three insecticides (diazinon, phorate, or carbofuran).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that activities involving exposure to agricultural pesticides during the first trimester of pregnancy may increase the risk of GDM.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy, affecting ~4% of pregnancies in the U.S. (1). Occurrence in the U.S. and worldwide differs by ethnicity, ranging between 1 and 14%, reflecting population-specific patterns seen for type 2 diabetes (2). GDM is regarded as an early stage in the progression to type 2 diabetes and has similar risk factors (3). Known risk factors for GDM include obesity, older maternal age, higher parity, having had GDM or a macrosomic infant in a previous pregnancy, and family history of diabetes (4,5).
Exposure to pesticides may result in abnormal glucose metabolism, increasing the risk of diabetes. In a cohort study of Australian outdoor workers, mortality from diabetes was elevated among those with high pesticide exposures compared with the general population (6). Studies of dioxin exposure (a contaminant of pesticides) are also suggestive of increased risk for type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia (7-9). In addition, there have been several case reports of glycosuria and transient hyperglycemia associated with herbicide or insecticide poisoning (10-12). Furthermore, glucose metabolism disturbances have been observed with exposure to both organo-chlorine and organophosphate insecticides in animal and in vitro studies (13-15). These disturbances include an increase in insulin and blood glucose concentrations, as well as changes in the activity of glucose metabolism enzymes (16-18).
While studies have examined the relationship between pesticides and diabetes (16-18), none have focused on GDM. In the diabetogenic state of pregnancy, women may be particularly susceptible to environmental triggers affecting glucose metabolism. In this article we investigated the risk of developing GDM in relation to pesticide exposures among wives of farmers enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study.
The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is a large study of licensed pesticide applicators and their families in Iowa and North Carolina. Farmers and commercial applicators using restricted-use pesticides must be licensed every 3 years. Between 1993 and 1997, 52,395 of those applying for a Private Pesticide License in Iowa and North Carolina enrolled in the AHS by completing a brief questionnaire. Seventy-five percent (32,171) of spouses also enrolled in the study by completing a different questionnaire (89.5% responded by mail and 10.5% by telephone). Of these, 61% (19,587) returned a Female and Family Health (FFH) questionnaire, with 18,335 reporting at least one pregnancy. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the National Institutes of Health, the University of Iowa, and the Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation. Additional details of the study are provided elsewhere (19).
Data for this study were obtained at the time of enrollment from both the applicators’ and spouses’ questionnaires (available at http://www.aghealth.org). The FFH questionnaire provided information on reproductive health, including pregnancies that occurred before enrollment in AHS. Detailed information on pregnancy complications and exposure history was collected on the most recent pregnancy. We excluded women whose pregnancy had occurred >25 years before enrollment in the study (n = 5,272), women whose age at the most recent pregnancy was missing (n =677), and women recorded as aged <16 or >49 years (n = 17) at the time of the pregnancy. We also excluded women whose pregnancy ended in a miscarriage, induced abortion, molar, or ectopic pregnancy (n =724) or if the outcome was not reported and the pregnancy did not reach 37 weeks of gestation (n = 104). Further exclusions included women reporting diabetes diagnosed before the age of 20 years (n = 46) and those with missing data on either GDM, pesticide-related activities during pregnancy, or other covariates of interest (n = 222). After these exclusions, 11,273 pregnancies remained for analysis.
Outcome definition
Information on pregnancy complications was only obtained for the most recent pregnancy. We categorized women as having had GDM if they answered “yes” to the question, “Did you have gestational diabetes (diabetes just during pregnancy) during this pregnancy?”
Exposure classification
To examine pesticide use, we used self-reported information from the FFH questionnaire about pesticide-related activities during the first trimester of the most recent (index) pregnancy. Exposures during the second and third trimesters were not ascertained. We defined four ordered pesticide exposure categories by combining activities with similar potential for pesticide exposure. The resulting categories, from lowest to highest, were: 1) no exposure, 2) indirect exposure (planting, pruning, weeding, picking, or harvesting), 3) residential exposure (applying pesticides to garden or inside house), and 4) agricultural exposure (mixing, applying pesticides to crops, or repairing pesticide application equipment). Women who reported activities pertaining to more than one category were classified according to the category reflecting the highest exposure potential.
Data on specific pesticide use during pregnancy were not collected. To explore the possible role of specific pesticides, we examined the association between GDM and the women’s self-reported ever-use of 50 individual pesticides. Our sample for these analyses was restricted to women who were classified in the agricultural exposure category during the index pregnancy. We report only those pesticides of a priori interest (2,4,5 T; 2,4,5 TP/silvex; and malathion), based on the existing studies (7-9) and those with at least five exposed cases.
Statistical analysis
We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of GDM as a function of pesticide exposure. We adjusted for BMI at enrollment (prepregnancy BMI was not available), mother’s age at delivery, parity at the beginning of the pregnancy (previous live births and stillbirths), and race. These covariates were decided a priori based on their being known predictors of GDM. We also adjusted for study center (Iowa and North Carolina). Additionally, for the models including women’s ever-use of pesticides, where appropriate, we adjusted for the five most common pesticides reported by women in the AHS (glyphosate; carbaryl; malathion; 2,4-D; and diazinon) (20). For our analyses, we used the AHS Phase 1 Release P1REL0310.01 data. All statistical analyses were done using SAS version 9.1 (21).
A total of 506 of 11,273 women (4.5%) reported having GDM in their most recent pregnancy. Of the study participants, >97% were white and >50% had greater than high school education (Table 1). Women aged >30 years at the time of the index pregnancy were more likely to report GDM. Women with GDM were more likely to report a BMI >25.0 kg/m2 at the time of enrollment (47%) compared with women without GDM (40%). There were no differences in parity or smoking status between women with and without GDM. Over half the women reported that they had mixed or applied pesticides at some time in their life (57%), and the proportion was similar for those with and without GDM. GDM was more common among women from North Carolina than among women from Iowa. The mean interval between enrollment and the most recent (index) pregnancy was 11.7 years.
Table 1
Table 1
Characteristics of women with and without GDM in the AHS, 1993–1997
Women whose activities during the first trimester of pregnancy involved agricultural exposures (mixing or applying pesticides or repairing pesticide-related equipment) had a twofold increased risk of developing GDM (adjusted OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.5–3.3]) (P <0.0001) (Fig. 1). We saw no increased risk of GDM among women with residential exposures (applying to home or garden) (1.0 [0.8–1.3]) or with indirect exposures (planting, pruning, weeding, picking, or harvesting) (0.9 [0.7–1.1]) during the first trimester of pregnancy (Fig. 1). Women who reported having mixed or applied pesticides at any time before enrollment in the AHS were not at increased risk of GDM compared with those who did not (data not shown).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted ORs for GDM and pesticide exposure category during pregnancy among wives of farmers in the AHS, 1993–1997. Models adjusted for BMI at enrollment, mother’s age at pregnancy, parity, race, and state categorized as shown in Table (more ...)
To reduce the potential for inaccurate recall, we restricted the analysis to women whose pregnancies occurred within 12 years of enrollment (n = 6,004). The adjusted OR for the association between agricultural exposure and GDM was 2.0 (95% CI 1.3–3.4). In addition, when we stratified the analysis by state, results were also unchanged (data not shown).
Pesticide-specific ORs for ever-use of 15 pesticides among women categorized with agricultural exposures during the first trimester of pregnancy (n = 337) are shown in Fig. 2. Risk of GDM was significantly associated with reporting of ever-use of the herbicides 2,4,5-T; 2,4,5-TP; atrazine; and butylate and the insecticides diazinon, phorate, and carbofuran.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pesticide-specific ORs for GDM among wives of farmers in the AHS reporting agricultural exposure during pregnancy. Individual models adjusted for BMI at enrollment with categories of <18.5 and 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 combined, mother’s (more ...)
Women enrolled in the AHS who reported activities involving agricultural pesticide exposures during the first trimester of their most recent pregnancy had a twofold increased risk of developing GDM. GDM risk was not increased among women who reported using pesticides only in the home and garden or who reported working in the fields. Prior analysis has shown that women in the AHS are involved in many aspects of farm work (22). Only mixing and applying pesticides during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with GDM. Thus, the association we observed is unlikely to be due to some uncontrolled correlate of participation in general farm activities. We had no information on specific pesticide use during pregnancy. For completeness, however, we examined the association between having ever mixed or applied individual pesticides at some time before enrollment and GDM only among women who reported agricultural exposures during the index pregnancy. These analyses are, however, limited by the small sample sizes. An elevated risk of GDM was associated with ever-use of four herbicides, two organophosphate insecticides, and one carbamate insecticide. Since we do not have information on the timing of exposure relative to pregnancy, any resulting misclassification is likely to have biased these estimates toward null values.
Although our findings of an association between 2,4,5-T and 2,4,5-TP and GDM are based on small numbers, they are of particular interest given the potential for contamination with dioxin in these pesticides (23). Several biologic mechanisms have been proposed for the effects of dioxin-like compounds on glucose metabolism (24). In general, most effects are thought to be mediated through interactions between aryl hydrocarbon receptors and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ–mediated signaling pathways (24), resulting in an increase in insulin resistance (14) and reduction in glucose transporter activity (15). Epidemiologic studies have also indicated an association between dioxin-like compounds and glucose metabolism (7-9,25). However, because these studies measured serum levels of TCDD (2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) after disease onset, it is possible that the disease process influenced TCDD metabolism. An advantage of questionnaire data in this instance is that our measure of pesticide exposure is unlikely to be influenced by disease processes.
Laboratory data have suggested a possible effect of malathion (an organophosphate) on glucose metabolism, including increases in insulin and blood glucose concentration and changes in key enzymes involved in gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis, and glycolysis. Similar mechanisms may be involved for other organophosphates (16,17). In our study we did not find an increased risk of GDM among women who reported agricultural exposures during pregnancy and ever-use of malathion (Fig. 2). Malathion is widely used for home and garden as well as for crop applications, and its purchase does not require a pesticide license (20). It is possible that we missed an association with malathion by focusing solely on women who reported mixing or applying pesticides to crops during the first trimester of the pregnancy. However, when we examined women reporting home and garden use of pesticides during the first trimester we still failed to see an association.
We saw an increased risk of GDM associated with two other organophosphate insecticides (diazinon and phorate) and one carbamate insecticide (carbofuran). Interestingly, there have been several case reports of glycosuria with and without hyperglycemia following pesticide poisoning with organophosphate insecticides and carbamates (10-12).
This study provides data on a large number of women who reported performing specific tasks during the first trimester of their most recent pregnancy. Even though GDM in this study was self-reported, the reported frequency of 4.5% is in the expected range for the U.S. (3–5%) (4). Although our analysis excluded women with diabetes diagnosed aged <20 years, we were unable to exclude preexisting type 2 diabetes for all women, since age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was asked in broad categories. Our GDM question asked specifically about “diabetes only during pregnancy” to facilitate more accurate reporting. Even so, bias from self-reported GDM may be a concern. Several studies in diverse populations have shown that maternal recall of rare obstetric complications (including GDM) is relatively accurate when compared with medical records (26-28). These studies report high sensitivity, which suggests that there are not likely to be unreported cases among the control subjects. While some women who report GDM may not have it, this would tend to bias our results toward the null.
The data on reported pesticide exposure during pregnancy span 25 years, which may affect accuracy of exposure reporting. However, we have previously found that farmers and their families tend to reliably report pesticide exposure history (29-31). Furthermore, our estimates were unchanged when we restricted the analysis to pregnancies that occurred within 12 years of enrollment. Unfortunately, the sample size was too small to focus on a shorter interval.
Our estimates may be affected by reporting bias if women who had GDM tended to over-report agricultural pesticide use during pregnancy or if women who had been exposed were more likely to report GDM. This is unlikely since GDM was not the primary focus of the questionnaire, and we characterized the exposure by aggregating responses to several individual questions. Furthermore, the increased risk observed in our estimates was associated only with activities with a greater potential for exposure to farm pesticides, while we saw no increase in risk with other activities.
Although adjusting for BMI had little effect on risk estimates, our ability to control for it was limited by the fact that we relied on weight reported at enrollment rather than before the index pregnancy. Even though BMI tends to track over time, BMI at enrollment will be a better surrogate for recent pregnancies than for those more distant in time. It was, however, reassuring that restricting the analysis to more recent pregnancies did not change the results. Furthermore, although BMI was not a confounder in our analysis, it was significantly associated with GDM. Due to small sample size, we were unable to explore whether race modified the association between agricultural exposure and GDM.
Pregnancy is a known diabetogenic state resulting from decreased insulin sensitivity (32,33). The inability to compensate for the decreased insulin sensitivity results in hyperglycemia above the normal pregnancy ranges. Although much is known about common risk factors for GDM, our understanding of whether and how environmental exposures may affect risk is still limited. Research shows that 20–50% of women with GDM will develop type 2 diabetes within 5–10 years (34). Thus, understanding any potential effect of environmental exposures on glucose tolerance during pregnancy may have substantial public health importance beyond the direct effects on GDM.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and National Cancer Institute.
The authors thank Stuart Long (Westat), the staff from the Iowa and North Carolina Field Stations, and the pesticide applicators and their families for their work and participation in Agricultural Health Study.
Abbreviations
AHSAgricultural Health Study
FFHFemale and Family Health
GDMgestational diabetes mellitus

1. King H. Epidemiology of glucose intolerance and gestational diabetes in women of childbearing age. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(Suppl 2):B9–B13. [PubMed]
2. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–1057. [PubMed]
3. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH. Gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:485–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Coustan DR. Diabetes in America. 2. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Diabetes Data Group; 1995. Gestational diabetes; pp. 703–718. NIH publ. no. 95-1468.
5. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2004;21:103–113. [PubMed]
6. Beard J, Sladden T, Morgan G, Berry G, Brooks L, McMichael A. Health impacts of pesticide exposure in a cohort of outdoor workers. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:724–730. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Henriksen GL, Ketchum NS, Michalek JE, Swaby JA. Serum dioxin and diabetes mellitus in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. Epidemiology. 1997;8:252–258. [PubMed]
8. Longnecker MP, Michalek JE. Serum dioxin level in relation to diabetes mellitus among Air Force veterans with background levels of exposure. Epidemiology. 2000;11:44–48. [PubMed]
9. Cranmer M, Louie S, Kennedy RH, Kern PA, Fonseca VA. Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Toxicol Sci. 2000;56:431–436. [PubMed]
10. Namba T, Nolte CT, Jackrel J, Grob D. Poisoning due to organophosphate insecticides: acute and chronic manifestations. Am J Med. 1971;50:475–492. [PubMed]
11. Hayes MM, van der Westhuizen NG, Gelfand M. Organophosphate poisoning in Rhodesia: a study of the clinical features and management of 105 patients. S Afr Med J. 1978;54:230–234. [PubMed]
12. Shobha TR, Prakash O. Glycosuria in organophosphate and carbamate poisoning. J Assoc Physicians India. 2000;48:1197–1199. [PubMed]
13. Kogevinas M. Human health effects of dioxins: cancer, reproductive and endocrine system effects. Human Reprod Update. 2001;7:331–339. [PubMed]
14. Alexander DL, Ganem LG, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gonzalez F, Jefcoate CR. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor is an inhibitory regulator of lipid synthesis and of commitment to adipogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:3311–3322. [PubMed]
15. Enan E, Liu PC, Matsumura F. TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-P-dioxin) causes reduction in glucose uptake through glucose transporters on the plasma membrane of the guinea pig adipocyte. J Environ Sci Health B. 1992;27:495–510. [PubMed]
16. Abdollahi M, Donyavi M, Pournourmohammadi S, Saadat M. Hyperglycemia associated with increased hepatic glycogen phosphorylase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in rats following sub-chronic exposure to malathion. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004;137:343–347. [PubMed]
17. Pournourmohammadi S, Farzami B, Ostad SN, Azizi E, Abdollahi M. Effects of malathion subchronic exposure on rat skeletal muscle glucose metabolism. Environl Toxicol and Pharmacol. 2005;19:191–196. [PubMed]
18. Abu-Basha EA, Yibchok-Anun S, Hopper DL, Hsu WH. Effects of the pesticide amitraz and its metabolite BTS 27271 on insulin and glucagon secretion from the perfused rat pancreas: involvement of alpha2D-adrenergic receptors. Metabolism. 1999;48:1461–1469. [PubMed]
19. Alavanja MC, Sandler DP, McMaster SB, Zahm SH, McDonnell CJ, Lynch CF, Pennybacker M, Rothman N, Dosemeci M, Bond AE, Blair A. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104:362–369. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kirrane EF, Hoppin JA, Umbach DM, Samanic C, Sandler DP. Patterns of pesticide use and their determinants among wives of farmer pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:856–865. [PubMed]
21. SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (version release 9.1) SAS Institute; Cary, NC: 2003.
22. Gladen BC, Sandler DP, Zahm SH, Kamel F, Rowland AS, Alavanja MC. Exposure opportunities of families of farmer pesticide applicators. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:581–587. [PubMed]
23. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Toxicological Profile for Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDDs) Atlanta, GA, U.S: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1998.
24. Remillard RBJ, Bunce NJ. Linking dioxins to diabetes: epidemiology and biologic plausibility. Environ Health Perspectives. 2002;110:853–858. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Calvert GM, Sweeney MH, Deddens J, Wall DK. Evaluation of diabetes mellitus, serum glucose, and thyroid function among United States workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56:270–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Solomon CG, Willett WC, Rich-Edwards J, Hunter DJ, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Manson JE. Variability in diagnostic evaluation and criteria for gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:12–16. [PubMed]
27. Hessol NA, Missett B, Fuentes-Afflick E. Lower agreement on behavioral factors than on medical conditions in self-reported data among pregnant Latina women. Arch Med Res. 2004;35:241–245. [PubMed]
28. Sou SC, Chen WJ, Hsieh WS, Jeng SF. Severe obstetric complications and birth characteristics in preterm or term delivery were accurately recalled by mothers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:429–435. [PubMed]
29. Blair A, Zahm SH. Patterns of pesticide use among farmers: implications for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1993;4:55–62. [PubMed]
30. Blair A, Tarone R, Sandler D, Lynch CF, Rowland A, Wintersteen W, Steen WC, Samanic C, Dosemeci M, Alavanja MC. Reliability of reporting on lifestyle and agricultural factors by a sample of participants in the Agricultural Health Study from Iowa. Epidemiology. 2002;13:94–99. [PubMed]
31. Hoppin JA, Yucel F, Dosemeci M, Sandler DP. Accuracy of self-reported pesticide use duration information from licensed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12:313–318. [PubMed]
32. Buchanan TA, Dornhurst A. The Metabolic Stress of Pregnancy. In: Dornhorst A, Hadden DR, editors. Diabetes and Pregnancy: An International Approach to Diagnosis and Management. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. pp. 45–61.
33. Catalano PM, Kirwan JP, Haugel-de Mouzon S, King J. Gestational diabetes and insulin resistance: role in short- and long-term implications for mother and fetus. J Nutr. 2003;133:1674S–1683S. [PubMed]
34. Centers for Disease Control. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2005.