Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
ACS Nano. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan 23, 2014.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3900637
Use of a Rapid Cytotoxicity Screening Approach to Engineer a Safer Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle through Iron Doping
Saji George,1,2+ Suman Pokhrel,3+ Tian Xia,1,2+ Benjamin Gilbert,4 Zhaoxia Ji,2 Marco Schowalter,5 Andreas Rosenauer,5 Robert Damoiseaux,6,2 Kenneth A Bradley,7,2 Lutz Mädler,3 and André E Nel1,2*
1Dept. of Medicine - Div. of NanoMedicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2California NanoSystems Institute at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3IWT Foundation Institute of Materials Science, Dept. of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, Germany
4Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
5University of Bremen, Institute for Solid State Physics, Bremen, Germany
6Molecular Shared Screening Resources, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
7Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*Address correspondence to- anel/at/
+Equal contribution
The establishment of verifiably safe nanotechnology requires the development of assessment tools to identify hazardous nanomaterial properties that could be modified to improve nanomaterial safety. While there is a lot of debate of what constitutes appropriate safety screening methods, one approach is to use the assessment of cellular injury pathways to collect knowledge about hazardous material properties that could lead to harm to humans and the environment. We demonstrate the use of a multi-parameter cytotoxicity assay that evaluates toxic oxidative stress to compare the effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2), cerium oxide (CeO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles in bronchial epithelial and macrophage cell lines. The nanoparticles were chosen based on their volume of production and likelihood of spread to the environment. Among the materials, dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles and Zn2+ release were capable of ROS generation and activation of an integrated cytotoxic pathway that includes intracellular calcium flux, mitochondrial depolarization, and plasma membrane leakage. These responses were chosen based on the compatibility of the fluorescent dyes that contemporaneously assess their response characteristics by a semi-automated epifluorescence procedure. Purposeful reduction of ZnO cytotoxicity was achieved by iron doping, which changed the material matrix to slow Zn2+ release. In summary, we demonstrate the utility of a rapid throughput, integrated biological oxidative stress response pathway to perform hazard ranking of a small batch of metal oxide nanoparticles, in addition to showing how this assay can be used to improve nanosafety by decreasing ZnO dissolution through Fe doping.
Keywords: nanoparticle, nanotoxicology, high content screening, hazard ranking, zinc oxide, dissolution, iron doping
The widespread use of engineered nanomaterials increases the likelihood that these materials will come into contact with humans and the environment. Because many biological processes take place at the nanoscale level there is the potential that engineered nanomaterials may interact with bio-molecules and cellular processes that are critical to life.1 Thus, although nanotechnology presents immense opportunities, there are concerns about the safety of these materials following intentional and unintentional human exposures. Identification of the hazard potential of nanoparticles and preventing harm to humans and the environment is of great importance for the widespread implementation and acceptance of this technology.1, 2 Early identification of potentially hazardous nanomaterial properties could also allow the re-design of these materials to improve safety while still maintaining key nanoscale properties.3 Such an approach has been implemented by side chain modification of nanoparticles,3 e.g., changing cationic amines to neutral acetamides on a dendrimer surface or attaching polyethylene glycol (PEG) to the particle surface to decrease bio-reactivity through steric hindrance.4 Similarly, functionalizing the fullerene and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) with carboxyl or hydroxyl groups was reported to decrease cytotoxic potential.5, 6 However, there are not many examples where the basic material characteristics have been modified through a rational design process to ameliorate toxicity. This is in part due to the lack of understanding of the material properties and the biological mechanisms that lead to toxicity, including how to properly screen for nanomaterial hazard. Hence, it has been difficult to implement a rational approach for the safe design of nanomaterials.
A screening tool that is capable of rapidly assessing key signals of nanoparticle toxicity in reporter cells would enhance the efficiency and rate at which hazard profiles can be acquired to plan in vivo testing as well as for the identification of hazardous material properties that could be re-engineered during the design phase.7 Rapid throughput screening approaches include the use fluorescence-based cellular assays with automated read-out by epifluorescence microscopy. These approaches can also be combined with high content screening (HCS), which has facilitated understanding of biological phenomena in cells as well as in drug screening.8 Recently, rapid throughput multi-parametric cellular screening has also been shown to be useful as a toxicological screening tool.912 The adoption of rapid throughput procedures would permit batches of nanomaterials or nanomaterial libraries to be screened for cytotoxic potential.12, 13 This could speed up knowledge acquisition of the property-activity relationships that are required to understand nanomaterial hazard at the nano-bio interface.3
Here, we report the optimization and validation of a multi-parametric fluorescence assay to compare the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2, CeO2 and ZnO), differing in their ability to generate oxidant injury in mammalian cells.1, 14, 15 We also show that this assay can be used for the identification of a hazardous nanomaterial property that could be improved through iron doping. We used oxidative stress injury to develop our assay based on previous demonstration that a hierarchical oxidative stress model is a useful screening procedure for nanoparticles that are capable of oxygen radical generation (Fig. S1).1 Moreover, we have also previously shown that the hierarchical oxidative stress paradigm is relevant for in vitro profiling of ambient particulate matter and is able to predict the ability of ambient ultrafine particles to induce atherosclerotic plaque formation and allergic airway inflammation in animals.16, 17 Briefly, Tier 1 oxidative stress constitutes a protective response wherein phase II enzyme expression attempts to restore redox disequilibrium.1, 14, 18, 19 However, if this antioxidant defense mechanism is overwhelmed, further escalation of oxidative stress could trigger a Tier 2 response that is characterized by pro-inflammatory effects resulting from cytokine and chemokine production.14, 16, 17 The highest tier of oxidative stress (Tier 3), a.k.a. toxic oxidative stress, involves mitochondrion-mediated cytotoxicity that can be triggered through intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) flux and opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore.20 We have previously demonstrated that a series of assays that assess each tier of oxidative stress can be used for in vitro hazard ranking of pro-oxidative nanoparticles.15 However, because of the labor intensiveness and longer time to complete these assays, we set out to develop a multi-parametric assay that utilizes fluorescence read-out of an integrated set of oxidative stress responses in one sitting. We show that it was possible to achieve this integration by combining oxidative stress events at the highest level of oxidative stress (Tier 3). Following the validation and optimization of our rapid throughput screening procedure, we theorized that it should be possible to demonstrate that the modification of a key ZnO property involved in oxidative injury, namely particle dissolution, could lead to a reduction in injury. We demonstrate that for ZnO nanoparticles it was possible to employ iron doping to change the dissolution characteristics and thereby render a less toxic material in our multi-parametric screen.
Metal oxide nanoparticle synthesis and characterization
TiO2, CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) as described in materials and methods. The choice of these materials to optimize and demonstrate the usefulness of rapid screening procedure was based on our recent demonstration of their differential toxic effects in cellular screening assays that assess biological hazard through incremental levels of oxidant injury.14, 15 The TEM image of TiO2 revealed tightly packed aggregates of small spherical (~10 nm) nanocrystals (Fig. 1A, a). The corresponding wide spot selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 1A, d) is indicative of the high crystallinity of TiO2.21 The XRD patterns show that the crystallites were either anatase or rutile with the approximate ratio of 4:1 (Fig. 1B, a). The intense diffraction peaks at (101), (004), (200), (105), (204) are attributed to anatase while those at (110) and 2θ ~75.24 (101) represent the rutile phase.2224 FSP synthesis of CeO2 from a cerium 2-ethylhexanoate precursor yielded particles of approximate size 5–8 nm (Fig. 1A, b). Their SAED pattern shows typical crystalline dots, which imply that the particles are comprised of many small crystals attached to each other in the same orientation to yield polycrystals (Fig. 1A, e). 25 The XRD pattern showing CeO2 planes at (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (311), (420), and (422) are indexed to the FCC structure with space group Fm3m having a lattice constant of a = 0.5410 nm according to JCPDS 78-0694 (Fig. 1B, b).2629
Figure 1
Figure 1
Physicochemical characterisation of metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs)
TEM images showed that 20 nm spheroidal ZnO particles that exhibit high crystallinity occasionally formed broken rod-like structures of 15–20 nm (Fig. 1A, c). The SAEDrings confirm that ZnO nanocrystals are in the wurtzite phase 30 and exhibit preferential instead of random orientation (Fig. 1A, f). All peaks in the XRD pattern for ZnO were indexed to hexagonal single phase ZnO (JCPDS No. 36–1451, a = b = 3.2498 Å, c = 5.2066 Å, space group: P63mc) 3134 in which each zinc atom is tetrahedrally coordinated with four oxygen atoms (Fig. 1B, c). Peaks at 2θ = 31.8°, 34.5°and 36.5° are attributed to ZnO (100), (002) and (10 1) planes, respectively.
Since the surface chemistry and dispersion state of the nanoparticles affect cellular uptake and bio-reactivity, we used a protein stabilization strategy to properly disperse the metal oxide nanoparticles in biological tissue culture media. Tissue culture media we used include Bronchial Epithelial Growth Medium (BEGM) and Complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (CDMEM) for growing bronchial epithelial (BEAS-2B) and macrophage (RAW 264.7) cell lines, respectively.15 Our approach is to initially disperse the particles in de-ionized water (to avoid buffered salt effects), and then to stabilize the particles by protein addition before final transfer into the tissue culture media. Table 1 show that particles agglomerate as a result of the buffered salts in the culture media.35 However, the agglomeration size was significantly reduced when BSA at a concentration of 20 mg/mL (w/v) was used to stabilize the nanoparticles before transfer to BEGM containing 2 mg/mL BSA or DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). BSA is known to transiently adsorb to metal oxide surfaces 36 and stabilize particle dispersion through steric or electrosteric effects. Upon dispersing the nanoparticles in cell culture media, their original positive surface charges in water changed to negative, which is likely due to protein interaction with the metal oxide surfaces (Table 1). This effect is reflected in the zeta potential measurements shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
NP size and zeta-potential in experimental dispersion conditions
Development of rapid throughput screening for metal oxide nanoparticles by epifluorescence microscopy
While there are a number of different cellular injury responses to nanomaterials, we are interested in toxicological pathways that integrate multiple upstream injury mechanisms. In this regard, we have previously demonstrated that it is possible to stratify the in vitro hazard potential of engineered and ambient nanoparticles using a series of cellular assays that measure different tiers of oxidative stress (Fig. S1).14, 15, 37 In fact, the oxidative stress paradigm has proven useful for comparing oxidant injury by engineered nanomaterials that exhibit properties such as electronically active surfaces (e.g., semiconductor particles), absorption or contamination with transition metals or redox cycling organic chemical impurities (e.g., carbon nanotubes), photoactivation leading to the generation of electron-hole pairs (e.g., TiO2), or dissolution of the particle surface and shedding of toxic metal ions that induce ROS (e.g., ZnO and chalcogenides).1, 14, 15, 37 Thus, in order to develop a rapid screening procedure for ZnO, CeO2 and TiO2 toxicity premised on oxidative stress injury, we initially experimented with fluorescent dye combinations to see if we can contemporaneously assess ROS production and oxidant injury. We observed, in accordance with our previous data,15 that ZnO but not CeO2 and TiO2 under dark conditions could induce H2O2 and O2•− production in RAW 264.7 cells and BEAS-2B cells using dichlorofluorescein acetate (DCF) and MitoSox Red respectively (Fig. S2). Unfortunately, it was not possible to combine these dyes with other fluorescent probes that assess cellular oxidant injury effects. However, we were able to find compatible dye combinations that could be combined in a multi-parametric assay that assesses Tier 3 hierarchical oxidative stress responses (Fig. 2A). These dyes include the DNA interactive agent, Hoechst 33342, JC1 (5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide), Fluo-4 and propidium iodide (PI). The cell-permeable Hoechst 33342 binds to DNA, allowing us to count the number of nuclei and locating the cells on the culture dish. JC-1 is a cationic dye that accumulates in the mitochondria of healthy cells. In this location, the dye exhibits red fluorescence but during a decrease of the MMP, the dye is released from this organelle allowing the monomer to accumulate in the cytosol where it fluoresces bright green. Therefore, the shift in fluorescence color from red to green is used to assess cells with compromised mitochondrial function. Propidium iodide (PI) is a red fluorescent dye that binds to DNA and is excluded from healthy cells by an intact plasma membrane. Damage of the plasma membrane in dying cells leads to the red fluorescence of the nucleus. Fluo-4 is a non-fluorescent cellular dye that is trapped inside living cells and fluoresces green when there is an increase in the cellular [Ca2+], occurring during generation of oxygen radicals and release of toxic metal ions that damage subcellular organelles.15 A visual example of the fluorescence changes captured by epifluorescence microscopy is shown in Fig. 2B. In BEAS-2B cells treated with ZnO, the drop in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) [panel (i)] is reflected as the appearance of green cytoplasmic fluorescence distinct from the granular and red fluorescence of mitochondria in untreated cells. The change in plasma membrane integrity and increase in intracellular calcium concentration, [Ca2+]i, manifest as increases in red and green fluorescence, respectively [panel (ii)].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluorescence probes-properties and utilities
With the dyes shown in Fig. 2A, it was possible to develop an independent rapid screening procedure that performs dose- (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μg/mL) and time-dependent (0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 hrs) quantification of integrated toxic oxidative stress responses in RAW 264.7 and BEAS-2B cells (Fig. 3 A and B, respectively). After correction for cell number and decrease in DNA content (Hoechst staining), ZnO nanoparticles could be seen to induce significant effects on intracellular Ca2+ flux, lowering of MMP, and loss of membrane integrity in both cell types. By contrast, CeO2 and TiO2 had little or no effect. The effect of ZnO on MMP, [Ca2+]i increase and PI uptake in RAW 264.7 cells commenced at doses of 12.5–25 μg/mL and within 3–6 hrs of introducing the particles (Fig. 3A). In contrast, all of the above responses were triggered in BEAS-2B cells in < 2 hours and by as little as 6 μg/mL ZnO (Fig 3B). Interestingly, TiO2 generated small but significant decreases of MMP in both cell types without any significant effects on cell viability. CeO2 did not exert any effect on any of the above response markers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multi-parametric assay to compare the cytotoxicity of metal oxide NPs in RAW 264.7 and BEAS-2B cells
In summary, hazard profiling according to our 4-dye rapid throughput approach was nearly identical to the profiling obtained in our conventional assay procedures.14, 15 However, it should be noted that while conventional assay procedures that assess each cellular response individually in a dose- and time-dependent fashion in different cell lines takes 2–3 weeks to complete, the rapid screening procedure can be accomplished in a single sitting following prior plating of cells.
Use of iron doping to synthesize ZnO nanoparticles exhibiting a decreased rate of dissolution
We have previously demonstrated that the cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of ZnO particles are related to particle dissolution intra- and extracellularly.15 We hypothesized, therefore, that a change in nanoparticle dissolution characteristics through iron doping should lead to a decreased toxicity that could be assessed by our multi-parametric procedure. Low resolution TEM (Fig. 4 A (a–b)), XRD (Fig. 4B) and BET (Fig. 4C) analyses showed a decrease in particle size with increasing iron concentration, a common trend when a dopant is incorporated into a host material during FSP synthesis.32, 38, 39 SAED and power spectrum (Fig 4A (c–f)) combined with high resolution TEM (Fig 4A (g–h)) confirmed that iron loading up to 10.2 atomic percentage is possible without difference in the lattice spacings, phase segregation and separate iron oxide particles. However, the crystal disorder in the doped particles increased with incremental Fe loading-likely due to oxygen vacancies that become the dominant source of structural disorder (Fig. 4D). Pre- and post-edge elemental mapping (Fig. 5A) and EELS in STEM mode (Fig. 5B) showed both Fe and Zn to be homogeneously distributed in the doped nanoparticles. An experimental inner-shell ionization Fe-L shell at 708 eV gave rise to an intense fine transition (Fig. 5B) responsible for the overlapping of the electrons from the neighboring atoms involved in an interatomic bonding. The effect of iron doping on the dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous solution were performed in electrolyte solution maintained at pH 7 ± 0.04 via pH stat control followed by aliquot extraction for dissolved zinc analysis (Fig 6A). After 10 days, Fe-doped nanoparticles appear to be less soluble than pure ZnO nanoparticles (Fig. S4). It is important to point out that lower zinc concentrations were observed for buffered vs. pure aqueous solutions, we infer that true equilibrium was not reached after 10 days. Thus, the strong bonding of Fe in the host lattice of ZnO is responsible for the significant reduction of ZnO nanoparticle dissolution. The presence of iron in the ZnO lattice affected the nanoparticle surface properties when suspended in water and cell culture media (Fig 6B). This is reflected by a decrease in zeta potential in water with incremental Fe doping levels (Fig. 6B). However, in the presence of protein containing cell culture media all the particles had approximately the same negative charge. In spite of the decrease in primary particle size with incremental dopant level (Fig. 4C), the average particle size in aqueous media was slightly bigger but still in the nm range (Fig 6B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Physicochemical characterisation of iron-doped ZnO NPs
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of Fe in crystal structure of ZnO NPs
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dissolution kinetics and physicochemical characteristics of iron doped ZnO NPs in aqueous media
Demonstration that iron doping and change in ZnO dissolution leads to reduced cytotoxicity as demonstrated in the multi-parametric assay
To test the hypothesis that reduced dissolution can improve nanomaterial safety, the cytotoxic effects of the panel of doped and undoped ZnO nanoparticles were evaluated using our rapid screening approach. In RAW 264.7 cells the mean % of cells positive for PI staining or cells exhibiting increased [Ca2+]i flux could be seen to decrease ~50% at the lowest Fe doping level (1.02%); this trend continued with increasing dopant levels and is statistically significant for doping levels and for every response being measured (Fig. 7A). Similarly, Fe doping slowed the loss of MMP, PI uptake and [Ca2+]i increase in BEAS-2B cells with increased atomic percentage of Fe (Fig. 7B). While all the responses returned to baseline at the highest doping level, the rates of decline was not as steep as RAW 264.7 cells, especially for the decline in MMP. These response differences could relate to differences in the routes of cellular nanoparticle uptake, including differences in the rate of dissolution of ZnO in the lysosomal and caveolar compartments of RAW 264.7 and BEAS-2B cells, respectively.15
Figure 7
Figure 7
Multi-parametric assay showing the effect of iron doping on the cytotoxicity of nano ZnO
In this communication, we demonstrate that it is possible to use a key pathway of nanomaterial toxicity to develop a rapid throughput assay procedure to assess the cytotoxic potential of three metal oxide nanoparticles, previously ranked for their toxic potential by conventional oxidative stress assays. Among the three metal oxide nanoparticles evaluated, ZnO was comparatively more toxic in our multi-parametric assay that assesses plasma membrane damage, [Ca2+]i flux, and mitochondrial depolarization. Because we have previously demonstrated in the conventional assays that ZnO nanoparticles are capable of inducing tier 2 and 3 oxidative stress responses through Zn2+ release, we used iron doping to test the hypothesis that decreased dissolution might decrease the cytotoxic potential of ZnO nanoparticles. We demonstrate through detailed physicochemical characterization that iron doping changes the ZnO nanoparticle matrix. These data demonstrate that it is possible to perform hazard ranking of chemically related nanomaterials by using an integrated biological injury pathway. We also demonstrate that if the nanomaterial property associated with the injury response is known, it is possible to use our biological screening assay to show that a composition change could affect material safety.
This is the first description of a multi-parametric assay that utilizes toxic oxidative stress to perform rapid screening of nanoparticle toxicity. In order to use a fluorescence-based approach it was necessary to obtain proper nanoparticle dispersal to avoid the artefacts that can be introduced by sedimenting agglomerates. This was achieved by using a protein-based nanoparticle dispersion strategy to stabilize the particles in de-ionized water prior to the introduction into protein containing tissue culture media. BSA and possibly other serum proteins are known to transiently adsorb to metal oxide surfaces,36 which could explain their stabilizing effects through steric hindrance and electrostatic effects (Table 1). A second issue that was addressed was the compatibility of fluorescence dyes included in our multi-parametric assay. The dye combinations that we settled on after serial experimentation were stable over the duration of the experiment and allowed contemporaneous assessment of cellular responses. We also carried out pilot studies where the dyes incubated with nanoparticles in the absence of cells to exclude the possibility of false positive results due to dye interactions with the particle surfaces. Further, the reliability of the cellular responses included in our screen was confirmed by traditional methodology (e.g., flow cytometry, ELISA or fluorometry) to assess membrane permeability changes, ATP content or metabolic activity. Apart from these precautions, we standardized the optimal number of cells (~1×104 cells per well of 384 well plate), optimal dye concentrations and incubation times with the dyes. A desired response characteristic that we could not introduce to the multi-parametric assay was cellular ROS production; this was due to incompatibility of the DCF and MitoSOX Red wavelengths with our selected dye combination (Fig. 2A). However, we did demonstrate that inclusion of these dyes in a parallel epifluorescence procedure could demonstrate increased H2O2 and superoxide generation by ZnO (Fig. S2), which is in accordance with the higher cytotoxic potential of these particles (Fig. 3).
There are numerous biological and molecular events that pre-stage or accompany the induction of cell death in response to engineered nanomaterials (Fig. 8). These include immediate biological injury requiring direct physical presence of hazardous nanomaterials as well as more distal injury responses that originate due to afferent injury. Cytotoxicity is an example of a downstream injury response to more immediate particle effects involving ROS production such as photoactivation (e.g., electron-hole pair formation during UV activation of TiO2), surface shedding of toxic metal ions that trigger cellular ROS generation (e.g., interference in mitochondrial electron transduction by cationic nanoparticles or dissolved Zn2+), electronically active surfaces (e.g., semiconductors), and presence of redox cycling chemical compounds (e.g., transition metal impurities in carbon nanotubes).1, 40 While our assay captures the events at the highest tier of oxidative stress (Tier 3), our attempts to develop a multi-parametric assay that also includes Tiers 1 and 2 was unsuccessful due to the labor intensiveness of such a procedure. We intend, however, to include the lower tier oxidative stress responses in future efforts because we believe that those responses do have clinical toxicological relevance. For instance, the in vitro oxidative stress profiling of ZnO nanoparticles have shown features that are analogous to the disease features of metal fume fever, an acute inflammatory condition of the lung in welders who are exposed to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles.41, 42 For instance, the expression of a tier 2-like response in macrophages and epithelial cells, characterized by interleukin 8 (IL-8) and TNF-α production, is reflective of similar cytokine production in the lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of exposed workers.15 In addition, metal fume fever is characterized by an adaptive response where prior exposure to welding fumes can avert metal fume fever upon re-exposure.43 This is reminiscent of a tier 1-like adaptive response.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic to illustrate the interrelatedness of cellular responses in our multi-parametric assay and the linkage to nanoparticle-induced ROS production
Our multi-parametric assay assesses the change in membrane permeability that develops in dying cells.44 In addition, our assay measures [Ca2+]i flux and mitochondrial depolarization that are functionally linked insofar as oxidative stress can trigger Ca2+ influx from the extracellular medium as well as from sequestered intracellular stores, such as the endoplasmic reticulum.45 Oxidative stress also inhibits Ca2+ transport from cytoplasm by inhibiting ATPase pumps such as Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA).46 The rise in [Ca2+]i simulates Ca2+ uptake into the mitochondria via uniporters. If this buffering action exceeds the threshold for mitochondrial Ca2+ sequestration, this could trigger large-scale opening of the permeability transition pore (PT pore), mitochondrial depolarization and the release of pro-apoptotic factors.47 This response is further enhanced by oxidative crosslinking of vicinal thiol groups in the PT pore.48 Thus, by combining membrane permeability with [Ca2+]i flux and mitochondrial depolarization, we have established a multi-parametric assay that goes beyond live/dead scoring. Fig. 8 summarizes this relationship. Please notice that [Ca2+]i flux and mitochondrial depolarization can also be achieved by non-oxidative injury pathways. This illustrates the importance of evaluating ROS generation to establish a relationship to oxidative stress. While we are currently unable to incorporate ROS production into the assay, it is possible that this could be achievable with future advances in cell imaging.
While there was good agreement in the hazard ranking of the metal oxides in the rapid throughput and conventional assay procedures,15 the former assay is accomplishable in one day versus the 2–3 weeks to complete the conventional assays. There is also good agreement between the results in RAW 264.7 and BEAS-2B cells, which were chosen because of differences in nanoparticle endocytic uptake routes.15 Thus, while the ZnO particles were mostly localized in a LAMP-1 positive compartment in RAW 264.7, the predominant uptake route in BEAS-2B cells are caveolae.15 Differences in the acidification and Zn2+ release in these compartments may determine the cascade of events leading to cytotoxicity (Fig. S3).15 While the exact molecular details of this complicated train of events requires further study, our multi-parametric assay demonstrates that it is possible to integrate key responses into a functional assay. In addition to drawing on these integrated responses, we foresee that a series of cellular response characteristics can be combined in cytotoxicity screening. Recently, a multi-dimensional assay was used as a rapid throughput procedure to compare the decrease in cell viability in response to a panel of paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles used for imaging purposes.12 These authors measured cytotoxic events such as ATP content, reducing equivalents, caspase-mediated apoptosis and MMP in different cell lines. Their analysis enabled them to identify nanomaterials with similar biologic activities.12 Further, the predictive power of multi-parametric in vitro assays was demonstrated under in vivo conditions.12
Since the critical steps in our multi-parametric assay (e.g., cell seeding, liquid handling, imaging, image analysis, etc) are automated, it is quite feasible that this test protocol can be further developed for high content or high throughput screening for a combinatorial library such demonstrated for the doped ZnO series (Fig. 7). We have just begun to expand the automated assay to assess large batches of nanomaterials not previously subjected to comparative screening and are currently able to analyze 5120 different variables in five days. This approach can speed up the knowledge generation and safety profiling of large batches of new nanomaterials that are entering the marketplace.40 In addition, the use of high throughput screening could lead to the discovery of unknown toxicological pathways. If, for instance, our procedure should reveal a cytotoxic material that does not generate ROS, this could prompt us to look at additional injury mechanisms such as surface membrane or DNA damage. It is also possible to envisage the emergence of a number of multi-parametric assays that assess non-oxidant injury mechanisms such as the protein unfolding response,49 triggering of immune “danger signals”, activation of signaling cascades,18 mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and apoptosis.3,50
For the in vitro screening assay to be a truly predictive toxicological tool, the assay results has to be linked to in vivo toxicological analysis.40 Thus, the in vitro screening assay only constitutes one step in nanomaterial safety assessment. We have therefore engaged in a series of experiments in the University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UCCEIN) to determine what effects the three metal oxides may have on a trophic series of life forms in freshwater, seawater and terrestrial mesocosms.51 The data that are emerging and currently being compiled for publication indicate that ZnO nanoparticles are indeed more toxic than TiO2 and CeO2 in environmental life forms such as bacteria, phytoplankton, plants, crustaceans and zebra fish. This is in agreement with a recent nano-ecotoxicological review of the effects of metal oxide nanoparticles, which documents that nano ZnO should be regarded as “extremely toxic” compared to the “harmful” labeling of nano TiO2.52 Moreover, it has also been clearly established that ZnO nanoparticle toxicity in the environment is dependent on solubilization and yields median L(E)C50 values of 0.06 μg/ml for algae, 1.9 μg/ml for fish, 5.4 μg/ml for ciliates, 20 μg/ml for bacteria and 121.2 μg/ml for yeasts.55 At present, data on real environmental concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles are scarce. However, a number of physicochemical and biotic factors contribute towards the magnification of nanoparticle concentration in environment,52 necessitating the inclusion of a range of concentrations in toxicological studies. For metal fume fever an 8-hour threshold limit value of 5 mg/m3 and 15-minute short-term exposure limit of 10 mg/m3 have been established to prevent adverse health effects by inhaling ZnO fumes, the exact intrapulmonary dose at sites of ZnO nanoparticle deposition and dissolution is unknown. However, we have previously demonstrated in the dose calculation for ambient fine particle that impact so-called hotspots of deposition in the lung that it is possible to achieve surface doses comparable to that in tissue culture dishes.53
Based on the importance of nanoparticle dissolution to ZnO toxicity, we hypothesized that lowering the rate of dissolution could decrease cytotoxicity. Since, mixed zinc–iron oxides are significantly more resistant to proton-assisted dissolution than pure zincite,54 we investigated the impact of iron doping on ZnO dissolution and cytotoxicity. As postulated, iron doping enhanced the aqueous stability of ZnO through strengthening of iron vs. zinc binding to oxygen.41 Consistent with this mechanism, we observed reduced dissolution after 10 days in buffered solution for iron-doped nanoparticles, although true equilibrium may not have been attained (Fig. S4). While the oxidation state of iron atoms doped in ZnO depends on the synthesis method and handling,55 iron is typically found to be present as high spin Fe2+ ions substituted for Zn2+ at lattice sites.55,56 Consideration of the crystal field splitting of the Fe 3d states (Fig S5) implies Fe2+ to be more strongly bound than Zn2+ despite lack of change in the Madelung contribution to the lattice energy. Iron atoms may also introduce a kinetic constraint for zinc release into solution,54 particularly if they preferentially segregate to surface sites as suggested by the zeta potential measurements. In addition, iron is an environmental friendly element that is abundantly found in the biological systems, making it an ideal candidate for designing safer nanomaterials.57
Consistent with the material properties of the doped particles, the cytotoxicity evaluation showed decreased ZnO cytotoxicity with incremental atomic percentages of iron (Fig. 7). While most of the toxicity parameters returned to normal at 4% Fe doping in RAW 264.7 cells, the decline was more gradual in BEAS-2B cells. These differences could be due to differences in the intracellular processing and endosomal acidification mechanism as discussed earlier.15 While it is possible that the change in doped particle size may have contributed to the biological effects, we did not observe a change in particle uptake when using TEM to compare high and low Fe-doped particles (not shown). However, further work is required and we will use techniques such as soft X-ray scanning transmission microscopy, micro X-ray fluorescence, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and environmental SEM to further dissected intracellular fate and dissociation of nano ZnO.
It is important to emphasize that cytotoxicity screening as a lone-standing exercise has several limitations and that the true toxicological significance of a cellular injury response can only be determined if it is associated with adverse biological effects in intact organisms and animals.40 Although, many studies point towards the possibility of extrapolating in vitro toxicity to in vivo toxicity,15, 58 one of the major concerns using in vitro assessment is that it can never represent all the events that shape in vivo toxicity. However, in vitro studies are excellent tools for studying cellular injury pathways and as a data gathering tool for prioritizing in vivo studies.
We demonstrate that our rapid multi-parametric screening procedure is capable of assessing changes in cell viability through an integrated toxicological paradigm. ZnO was comparatively more toxic than TiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles based on the principle of particle dissolution and shedding of toxic Zn2+. This toxicity could be reduced by iron doping which leads to a stabilization of material crystal structure. In ZnO containing sunscreens, for instance, subtle changes in crystal structure may not compromise their protection against sunlight although it may affect the electrical and magnetic properties of this material. Overall, our study demonstrates the utility of integrated cytotoxicity screening assays to assess nanomaterial hazard as well as how to improve material safety through rational modification of toxicological properties.
FSP synthesize of metal oxide nanoparticles
For FSP, the metallorganic based precursors, titanium isopropoxide (Aldrich), cerium (III) 2-ethylhexanoate (49% in 2-ethylhexanoic acid) and zinc napthenate (8% of Zn by metal, Strem) were used for the synthesis of the respective metal oxide nanoparticles. 50 mL of 0.5 M zinc napthenate was separately mixed with 0.6–6.0 mL of 0.5 M iron napthenate to make 1–10% of Fe doping in ZnO. All the precursors were dissolved in an organic solvent (xylene, 99.95%, Strem) to keep the metal to 0.5M except for the cerium precursor that was used at 0.27 M. Each liquid precursor was delivered to the nozzle tip by a syringe pump at a flow rate of 5 mL/min by atomising the precursor solution with dispersant O2 at a flow rate of 5mL/min and maintaining a pressure drop of 1.5 bar at the nozzle tip. Combustion of the dispersed droplets is initiated by the co-delivery of CH4 and O2 (1.5 L/min, 3.2 L/min) to form a flame.59
Nanoparticle dispersion in cell culture media
Nanoparticle stock solutions (5 mg/mL) were prepared by dispersing the nanoparticle powder in deionized water by probe sonication (3W). To ensure proper dispersion of nanoparticles, the stock solution was sonicated before removing aliquots to prepare working solutions. In order to coat the surface of nanoparticles with bovine serum albumin (BSA), the aliquoted nanoparticle suspension (~10 μl) was mixed with an equal volume of 4% BSA (Fraction –V; Gemini Bio-products, USA) and equilibrated for one hour at room temperature. Cell culture media (1 mL) were added to the BSA-coated nanoparticle suspensions. The particle suspensions in BEGM were further stabilized by the addition of BSA at a final concentration of 2 mg/mL. The nanoparticle suspensions were sonicated (3W) for 15s prior to the addition to tissue culture plates.
Aggregate size distribution and zeta potential measurement
Aggregate size distribution (PSD) was assessed in a ZetaSizer Nano (Malvern Instruments, Westborough, MA). This instrument measures DLS (173°) of nanoparticles in the range of 100–6000 nm by backscattering. The same instrument was used to measure the electrophoretic mobility of nanoparticle suspensions. Electrophoretic mobility is used as an approximation of particle surface charge and is transformed into zeta-potential using the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equation. Particle size distribution and electrophoretic mobility were performed in complete cell culture media at pH 7.4.
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of nanoparticles
N2 adsorption-desorption measurements were carried out at 77°K using a Quantachrome NOVA 4000e Autosorb gas sorption system. The BET method was used to determine the specific surface areas of the samples. The powders were placed in a test cell and allowed to degas for 2 hours at 200°C in flowing nitrogen. Data were obtained by introducing or removing a known quantity of adsorbing gas in or out of a sample cell containing the solid adsorbent maintained at a constant liquid nitrogen temperature. The specific surface area of ZnO, CeO2 and TiO2 were found to be 52.11 (± 0.13), 164.03 (± 2. 22), 144.91(± 3.16) m2/g corresponding to particle sizes of 20.2, 5.01 and 9.71 nm, respectively. XRD was collected in a reflection mode on the PW 3040/60 X’Pert PRO diffractometer equipped with X’Celerator linear detector using a Cu Kα (lambda; =0.154 nm) radiation and step size of 0.01°.
Transmission electron microscopic analysis of nanoparticles
The FSP-generated metal oxide nanoparticles were sonicated (water bath) in ethanol for three hours before TEM analysis. The microscopic imaging of the specimens were investigated with a FEI Titan 80/300 microscope equipped with a Cs corrector for the objective lens, a Fischione high angle annular dark field detector (HAADF), GATAN post-column imaging filter and a cold field emission gun operated at 300 kV as an acceleration voltage. To obtain EELS spectrum, Gatan parallel EELS spectrometer was operated at 0.2 eV per channel as an energy dispersive detector. Kevex energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer was used at 10 eV per channel for EELS spectra, SAED patterns and EDX. Spectra were taken at each sampling point in order to identify the homogeneity of the samples. EFTEM images of pre and post edges of elemental mappings were obtained from the data by energy calibration and background subtraction. Zero loss and low loss spectra were also taken at each sampling point for energy calibration and for sample thickness. Calibration was made by using the energy of the zero loss, low loss or core loss at the lower energy.
Cell culture and co-incubation with nanoparticles
All cell cultures were maintained in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks, in which the cells were passaged at 70–80% confluency every 2–4 days depending on the cell type. Recently thawed RAW 264.7 cells (ATCC# TIB71) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) (In Vitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine (complete medium) 15. These cells were plated at 5,000 cells per well into 384 well plates (CellBound, Corning Inc, MA, USA). Cells were cultured overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator before nanoparticle treatment. BEAS-2B (ATCC# CRL-9609) cells were cultured in BEGM (Lonza, San Diego, CA) in type-I rat tail collagen-coated flasks. Trypsinized cells were washed and plated at 5,000 cells per well (in 50 μL) into 384 well plates. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator while BEAS-2B cells were cultured for two days before nanoparticle treatment. Nanoparticles prior coated with BSA and then dispersed in CDMEM or BEGM added with 2 mg/mL BSA were used to treat RAW 264.7 and BEAS-2B cells, respectively. Nanoparticle exposures were carried out at concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μg/mL for 3 hrs or were exposed to 50 μg/mL nanoparticles for 1, 2, 3 and 6 hrs.
Cellular staining with fluorescent probes and high content epifluoresence microscopy
Two cocktails of fluorescent probe mixtures were prepared by mixing wavelength-compatible fluorescent probes in DMEM media devoid of phenol red. The first cocktail contained Hoechst 33342 (1 μM) and JC1 (1 μM) while the second cocktail contained Hoechst 33342 (1 μM), Fluo-4 (5 μM) and propidium iodide (5 μM). The utility of these dyes, their excitation-emission wavelengths, and cellular responses are summarized in Fig 2A. Cells in each well of the multiwell plates were incubated with 50 μL of dye mixture for 30 min under standard cell culture conditions in the dark. Unincorporated dyes were removed by washing, following which tissue culture wells were replenished with phenol red-free DMEM or BEGM. Plates were acquired on an Image-Xpressmicro (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) equipped with laser autofocus. Images were processed using MetaXpress (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) under a 10× magnification. DAPI, FITC and TRITC filter/dichroic combinations were used to image Hoechst 33342 (blue), Fluo-4 (green), and PI (red), respectively. The total number of nuclei was counted using the following thresholds: In the Hoechst/DAPI channel the approximate minimum width was 3 μm (about 3 pixels) and the approximate maximum width was 10 μm (about 7 pixels). The intensity above background level was 100 gray levels. For the FITC and TRITC channels the approximate minimum width was 5 μm (about 6 pixels) and the approximate maximum width is 30 μm (about 22 pixels). The intensity above background is 250 and 500 gray levels, respectively. The percentage of cells positive for a given cellular response was calculated based on the total number of cells (Hoechst 33342 positive cells) and total number of cells having fluorescence intensity above the defined threshold intensity for that parameter. The raw data were exported to an Excel file for comparison and statistical analysis.
ZnO nanoparticle dissolution studies
The effect of iron doping on the rate of ZnO dissolution and Zn2+ release was studied by adding 6.7 – 6.9 mg of material to 25 mL of a 0.1 M sodium perchlorate solution at pH 7 and 22 °C. Following an initial pH drop, the pH rebounded as expected for the reaction:
equation M1
Solution pH was maintained at pH 7.0 ± 0.4 by the addition of nitric acid controlled by the pH stat function of a Mettler-Toledo T70 autotitrator. The reaction was followed by recording the addition of acid with time and by periodic sampling of 100 μL aliquots for total zinc analysis following dilution with 1 mL of electrolyte solution and centrifugation for 5 min at 20,000g to remove non-dissolved suspended nanoparticles. 500 μL of supernatant was acidified with 500 μL of 7% ultra high purity nitric acid, and the zinc ion concentration, [Zn], measured with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Perkin-Elmer SCIEX Elan DRCII. There was close agreement between the measured [Zn] and the predicted concentrations based on the rate of acid addition assuming Eqn (1), indicating this to be the dominant process, with no significant formation of solid or aqueous phase protonated species, as expected for pH 7. We used the phreeqc code to estimate the equilibrium concentration of Zn(aq) in 0.1M NaClO4 at pH 7 due to the dissolution of bulk zincite at 25°C. [Zn]eq ~ 4.4 mM, indicating that equilibrium was not reached during the dissolution studies.60
The effect of iron doping on the long-term dissolved zinc concentration was studied by equilibrating 1 mg of each nanomaterial with 1 mL of a 0.1 M solution of 1,4–piperazinediethanesulfonic acid (PIPES) buffer at pH 7 for 10 days. The PIPES buffer exhibits weak affinity for divalent metal ions, and thus was not anticipated to affect the zinc oxide solubility product through complexation with aqueous species. The samples were centrifuged for 1 hour with temperature control and 100 μL of supernatant was removed for ICP-MS analysis of total zinc.
Supplementary Material
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement Number EF 0830117. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Environmental Protection Agency. This work has not been subjected to an EPA peer and policy review. Key support was provided by the UC Lead Campus for Nanotoxicology Training and Research, funded by UC TSR&TP, US Public Health Service Grants (U19 AI070453, RO1 ES016746, and RC2 ES018766) and the US EPA STAR award (RD-83241301) to the Southern California Particle Center. B.G. acknowledges funding from DOE BES DE-AC02-05CH11231 and thanks Joern Larsen for the ICP-MS analysis.
Supporting Information Available: Hierarchical oxidative stress paradigm, Assessment of ROS production by metal oxide NPs, Mechanism of ZnO NP mediated cytotoxicity, Dissolution of Zn2+ from iron doped ZnO NPs, Proposed model for reducing Zn2+ dissolution from ZnO NPs. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
1. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–627. [PubMed]
2. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, et al. Safe Handling of Nanotechnology. Nature. 2006;444:267–269. [PubMed]
3. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EMV, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M. Understanding Biophysicochemical Interactions at the Nano-bio Interface. Nat Mater. 2009;8:543–557. [PubMed]
4. Stasko NA, Johnson CB, Schoenfisch MH, Johnson TA, Holmuhamedov EL. Cytotoxicity of Polypropylenimine Dendrimer Conjugates on Cultured Endothelial Cells. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:3853–3859. [PubMed]
5. Sayes CM, Fortner JD, Guo W, Lyon D, Boyd AM, Ausman KD, Tao YJ, Sitharaman B, Wilson LJ, Hughes JB, et al. The Differential Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Fullerenes. Nano Lett. 2004;4:1881–1887.
6. Sayes CM, Liang F, Hudson JL, Mendez J, Guo W, Beach JM, Moore VC, Doyle CD, West JL, Billups WE, et al. Functionalization Density Dependence of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes Cytotoxicity in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 2006;161:135–142. [PubMed]
7. Service RF. Nanotechnology: Can High-Speed Tests Sort out Which Nanomaterials are Safe? Science. 2008;321:1036–1037. [PubMed]
8. Abraham VC, Taylor DL, Haskins JR. High Content Screening Applied to Large-Scale Cell Biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:15–22. [PubMed]
9. Abraham VC, Towne DL, Waring JF, Warrior U, Burns DJ. Application of a High-Content Multiparameter Cytotoxicity Assay to Prioritize Compounds Based on Toxicity Potential in Humans. J Biomol Screen. 2008;13:527–537. [PubMed]
10. O’Brien PJ, Irwin W, Diaz D, Howard-Cofield E, Krejsa CM, Slaughter MR, Gao B, Kaludercic N, Angeline A, Bernardi P, et al. High Concordance of Drug-induced Human Hepatotoxicity with in vitro Cytotoxicity Measured in a Novel Cell-based Model Using High Content Screening. Arch Toxicol. 2006;80:580–604. [PubMed]
11. Jones CF, Grainger DW. In Vitro Assessments of Nanomaterial Toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:438–456. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Shaw SY, Westly EC, Pittet MJ, Subramanian A, Schreiber SL, Weissleder R. Perturbational Profiling of Nanomaterial Biologic Activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7387–7392. [PubMed]
13. Weissleder R, Kelly K, Sun EY, Shtatland T, Josephson L. Cell-specific Targeting of Nanoparticles by Multivalent Attachment of Small Molecules. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1418–1423. [PubMed]
14. Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, Oberley T, Sioutas C, Yeh JI, Wiesner MR, Nel AE. Comparison of the Abilities of Ambient and Manufactured Nanoparticles to Induce Cellular Toxicity According to an Oxidative Stress Paradigm. Nano Lett. 2006;6:1794–1807. [PubMed]
15. Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Mädler L, Gilbert B, Shi H, Yeh JI, Zink JI, Nel AE. Comparison of the Mechanism of Toxicity of Zinc Oxide and Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Dissolution and Oxidative Stress Properties. ACS Nano. 2008;2:2121–2134. [PubMed]
16. Li N, Wang MY, Bramble LA, Schmitz DA, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C, Harkema JR, Nel AE. The Adjuvant Effect of Ambient Particulate Matter is Closely Reflected by the Particulate Oxidant Potential. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1116–1123. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Araujo J, Nel A. Particulate Matter and Atherosclerosis: Role of Particle Size, Composition and Oxidative Stress. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2009;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Xiao GG, Wang M, Li N, Loo JA, Nel AE. Use of Proteomics to Demonstrate a Hierarchical Oxidative Stress Response to Diesel Exhaust Particle Chemicals in a Macrophage Cell Line. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:50781–50790. [PubMed]
19. Li N, Alam J, Venkatesan MI, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Schmitz D, Di Stefano E, Slaughter N, Killeen E, Wang X, Huang A. Nrf2 is a Key Transcription Factor that Regulates Antioxidant Defense in Macrophages and Epithelial Cells: Protecting Against the Proinflammatory and Oxidizing Effects of Diesel Exhaust Chemicals. J Immunol. 2004;173:3467–3481. [PubMed]
20. Xia T, Korge P, Weiss JN, Li N, Venkatesen MI, Sioutas C, Nel A. Quinones and Aromatic Chemical Compounds in Particulate Matter Induce Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Implications for Ultrafine Particle Toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1347–1358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Antonietti YZ, Antonietti M. Synthesis of Very Small TiO2 Nanocrystals in a Room-temperature Ionic Liquid and their Self-assembly Toward Mesoporous Spherical Aggregates. J Am Chem Soc Commun. 2003;125:14960–14961. [PubMed]
22. Chen X, Mao SS. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, Modifications, and Applications. Chem Rev. 2007;107:2891–2959. [PubMed]
23. Niederberger M, Batl MH, Stucky GD. Benzyl Alcohol and Titanium Tetrachloride-A Versatile Reaction System for the Nonaqueous and Low-Temperature Preparation of Crystalline and Luminescent Titania Nanoparticles. Chem Mater. 2002;14:4364–4370.
24. Zhang Z, Zhong X, Liu S, Li D, Han M. Aminolysis Route to Monodisperse Titania Nanorods with Tunable Aspect Ratio. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3466–3470. [PubMed]
25. Qizheng C, Xiangting D, Jinxian W, Mei L. Direct Fabrication of Cerium Oxide Hollow Nanofibers by Electrospinning. Journal of Rare Earth. 2008;26:664–669.
26. Zhang D, Fu H, Shi L, Pan C, Li Q, Chu Y, Yu W. Synthesis of CeO2 Nanorods via Ultrasonication Assisted by Polyethylene Glycol. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:2446–2451. [PubMed]
27. Godinho M, Riberio C, Longo E, Leite ER. Influence of Microwave Heating on the Growth of Gadolinium Doped Cerium Oxide Nanorods. Cryst Growth Des. 2008;8:384–386.
28. Feng X, Sayle DC, Wang ZL, Paras MS, Santora B, Sutorik AC, Sayle TXT, Yang Y, Ding Y, Wand X, et al. Converting Ceria Polyhedral Nanoparticles into Single Crystal Nanospheres. Science. 2006;312:1504–1508. [PubMed]
29. Lee JS, Kim SJ. Synthesis and Characterization of Ce1-xGd x O2-δ Nanorods. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:661–663.
30. Karmakar D, MandaL SK, Kadam RM, Paulose PL, Rajarajan AK, Nath TK, Das AK, Dasgupta I. Ferromagnetism in Fe-doped ZnO Nanocrystals: Experiment and Theory. Phys Rev B. 2007;75:144404–144414.
31. Xingfu Z, Zhaolin H, Yiqun F, Su C, Weiping D, Nanping X. Microspheric Organization of Multilayered ZnO Nanosheets with Hierarchically Porous Structures. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:11722–11728.
32. Height MJ, Mädler L, Pratsinis SE. Nanorods of ZnO Made by Flame Spray Pyrolysis. Chem Mater. 2006;18:572–578.
33. Yang DS, Lao C, Zewail AH. 4D Electron Diffraction Reveals Correlated Unidirectional Behavior in Zinc Oxide Nanowires. Science. 2008;321:1660–1664. [PubMed]
34. Zhengrong RT, Voigt JA, Liu J, Mckenzie B, Mcdermott MJ, Rodriguez MA, Konishi H, Xu H. Complex and Oriented ZnO Nanostructures. Nat Mater. 2003;2:821–826. [PubMed]
35. Mayer A, Vadon M, Rinner B, Novak A, Wintersteiger R, Fröhlich E. The Role of Nanoparticle Size in Hemocompatibility. Toxicology. 2009;258:139–147. [PubMed]
36. Rezwan K, Studart AR, Voros J, Gauckler LJ. Change of Potential of Biocompatible Colloidal Oxide Particles upon Adsorption of Bovine Serum Albumin and Lysozyme. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:14469–14474. [PubMed]
37. Xia T, Kovochich M, Liong M, Zink JI, Nel AE. Cationic Polystyrene Nanosphere Toxicity Depends on Cell-specific Endocytic and Mitochondrial Injury Pathways. ACS Nano. 2008;2:85–96. [PubMed]
38. Mädler L, Stark WJ, Pratsinis SE. Rapid Synthesis of Stable ZnO Quantum Dots. J Appl Phys. 2002;92:6537–6540.
39. Shailaja M, Kavita B, Bendre BS, Valerie JL, Subhash HR. Spectroscopic and Structural Characterization of Electrochemically Grown ZnO Quantum Dots. J Appl Phys. 1999;85:2861–2865.
40. Meng H, Xia T, George S, Nel AE. The Use of a Predictive Toxicological Paradigm to Study Nanomaterial Toxicity. ACS Nano. 2009;3:1620–1627. [PubMed]
41. Martin CJ, Le XC, Guidotti TL, Yalcin S, Chum E, Audette RJ, Liang CK, Yuan BS, Zhang X, Wu J. Zinc Exposure in Chinese Foundry Workers. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35:574–580. [PubMed]
42. Rohrs LC. Metal-Fume Fever from Inhaling Zinc Oxide. Arch Inter Med. 1957;100:44–49. [PubMed]
43. Gordon T, Fine JM. Metal Fume Fever. Occupational Medicine-State of the Art Reviews. 1993;8:505–517. [PubMed]
44. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams J, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, Blagosklonny MV, El-Deiry WS, Golstein P, Green DR, et al. Classification of Cell Death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Differ. 2008;16:3–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Perraud AL, Knowles HM, Schmitz C. Novel Aspects of Signaling and Ion-Homeostasis Regulation in Immunocytes: The TRPM Ion Channels and their Potential Role in Modulating the Immune Response. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:657–673. [PubMed]
46. Ihara Y, Kageyama K, Kondo T. Overexpression of Calreticulin Sensitizes SERCA2a to Oxidative Stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:1343–1349. [PubMed]
47. Rodriguez-Enriquez S, He L, Lemasters JJ. Role of Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pores in Mitochondrial Autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:2463–2472. [PubMed]
48. Halestrap AP, McStay GP, Clarke SJ. The Permeability Transition Pore Complex: Another View. Biochimie. 2002;84:153–166. [PubMed]
49. Jung EJ, Avliyakulov NK, Boontheung P, Loo JA, Nel AE. Pro-oxidative DEP Chemicals Induce Heat Shock Proteins and an Unfolding Protein Response in a Bronchial Epithelial Cell Line as Determined by DIGE Analysis. Proteomics. 2007;7:3906–3918. [PubMed]
50. Xia T, Li N, Nel AE. Potential Health Impact of Nanoparticles. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:137–150. [PubMed]
51. Godwin HA, Chopra K, Bradley KA, Cohen Y, Harthorn BH, Hoek EMV, Holden P, Keller AA, Lenihan HS, Nisbet RM, et al. The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6453–6457. [PubMed]
52. Kahru A, Dubourguier H-C. From Ecotoxicology to Nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology. 2009 In press.
53. Phalen RF, Oldham MJ, Nel AE. Tracheobronchial Particle Dose Considerations for In Vitro Toxicology Studies. Toxicol Sci. 2006;92:126–132. [PubMed]
54. Elgersma F, Witkamp GJ, Vanrosmalen GM. Kinetics and Mechanism of Reductive Dissolution of Zinc Ferrite in H2o and D2o. Hydrometallurgy. 1993;33:165–176.
55. Wang RP, Sleight AW, Subramanian MA. An Unusual Iron Site in Iron-Doped Zinc Oxide. J Solid State Chem. 1996;125:224–227.
56. Wang LM, Liao JW, Peng ZA, Lai JH. Doping Effects on the Characteristics of Fe:ZnO Films: Valence Transition and Hopping Transport. J Electrochem Soc. 2009;156:H138–H142.
57. Jin J, Li R, Wang HL, Chen HN, Liang K, Ma JT. Magnetic Fe Nanoparticle Functionalized Water-soluble Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubules Towards the Preparation of Sorbent for Aromatic Compounds Removal. Chem Commun. 2007;4:386–388. [PubMed]
58. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W, Donaldson K. Carbon Nanotubes Introduced into the Abdominal Cavity of Mice Show Asbestos-like Pathogenicity in a Pilot Study. Nat Nano. 2008;3:423–428. [PubMed]
59. Maädler L, Stark WJ, Pratsinis SE. Flame-made Ceria Nanoparticles. J Mater Res. 2002;17:1356–1362.
60. Parkhurstand DL, Appelo CAJ. Users’s Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2) Water-Resources Investigations Report. 1999:99–4259.