|Accueil | Aperçu | Revues | Soumettre | Nous Contacter | English|
Resveratrol is a natural compound that affects energy metabolism and mitochondrial function and serves as a calorie restriction mimetic, at least in animal models of obesity. Here we treated 11 healthy, obese men with placebo and 150 mg/day resveratrol in a randomized double-blind cross-over study for 30 days. Resveratrol significantly reduced sleeping- and resting metabolic rate. In muscle, resveratrol activated AMPK, increased SIRT1 and PGC-1α protein levels, increased citrate synthase activity without change in mitochondrial content, and improved muscle mitochondrial respiration on a fatty acid-derived substrate. Furthermore, resveratrol elevated intramyocellular lipid levels, and decreased intrahepatic lipid content, circulating glucose, triglycerides, alanine-aminotransferase, and inflammation markers. Systolic blood pressure dropped and HOMA index improved after resveratrol. In the postprandial state, adipose tissue lipolysis and plasma fatty acid and glycerol decreased. In conclusion, we demonstrate that 30 days of resveratrol supplementation induces metabolic changes in obese humans, mimicking the effects of calorie restriction.
In our western society, the number of age-related chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes and cancer increases progressively (Crews, 2005).
The only non-pharmacological intervention known to date to alleviate these deleterious conditions is calorie restriction. Reduction of calorie intake to 30-50% below ad libitum levels, or every-other-day feeding, can delay the onset of age-related diseases, improve stress resistance, and decelerate functional decline (Barger et al., 2003; Goodrick et al., 1990; McCay et al., 1935). Although short-term dietary restriction has metabolic effects in humans such as lowering metabolic rate (Heilbronn et al., 2006), improving insulin sensitivity (Larson-Meyer et al., 2006; Lim et al., 2011) and reducing cardiovascular risk factors (Lefevre et al., 2009), eating less for the sake of creating a desirable metabolic profile is unlikely to gain widespread compliance. As such, the focus has been on the development of calorie restriction mimetics that evoke some of the benefits of calorie restriction without an actual reduction in calorie intake. In that respect, sirtuins are considered an important molecular target (Canto and Auwerx, 2009). Indeed, it was suggested that the yeast Sir2 gene (Lin et al., 2000) or its worm (Tissenbaum and Guarente, 2001) and fly (Rogina and Helfand, 2004) orthologues are required for the effects of calorie restriction, although the relevance of the role of Sir2/SIRT1 as a strictu sensu longevity regulator is debated (Burnett et al., 2011). What is clear, however, is that mammalian SIRT1 plays a context-dependent role in health span regulation, for instance by mediating effects in metabolic stress situations, such as high-fat diet-induced obesity (Baur et al., 2006; Lagouge et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 2008). As such, SIRT1 confers protection against ageing-associated metabolic diseases such as glucose intolerance and cancer (Herranz et al., 2010; Pearson et al., 2008; Rutanen et al., 2010). In light of the growing number of patients suffering from metabolic diseases, compounds that activate SIRT1 directly or indirectly might offer protection against the onset of metabolic damage and promote healthy ageing.
To this end, Howitz and colleagues performed an in vitro screen to identify small molecule activators of SIRT1 (Howitz et al., 2003). Resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound present in various dietary components such as mulberries, peanuts, grapes and red wine, was identified as the most potent activator of SIRT1 (Howitz et al., 2003). Recently, it was shown, however, that resveratrol may not activate SIRT1 directly (Beher et al., 2009; Pacholec et al., 2010), but rather exerts its effects on SIRT1 through activation of AMPK (Baur et al., 2006; Canto et al., 2009; Canto et al., 2010; Feige et al., 2008; Hawley et al., 2010; Um et al., 2010), although additional direct SIRT1 activation is not completely excluded (Dai et al., 2010). Regardless of the mode of activation, resveratrol treatment in mice fed a high calorie diet consistently improved various health parameters including glucose homeostasis, endurance and survival (Baur et al., 2006; Lagouge et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2007), and has therefore been suggested to act as a calorie restriction mimetic. However, so far no human studies have been reported that have systematically examined the metabolic effects of resveratrol in vivo.
Here, we gave obese but otherwise healthy subjects a dietary supplement containing 99% pure trans-resveratrol (resVida™), during 30 days and examined whole-body energy expenditure, substrate utilization, ectopic lipid storage, mitochondrial function, and lipolysis in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle using a combination of in vivo and ex vivo measurements. Our data show that like calorie restriction, resveratrol supplementation lowers energy expenditure, improves metabolic profile, as well as global health parameters.
Eleven obese but otherwise healthy male volunteers without a family history of diabetes or any other endocrine disorder participated in this study. Baseline characteristics of the subjects are included in table 1. Subjects participated in two experimental trials: (1) a placebo and (2) a resveratrol (150 mg/day (99%); resVida™) (provided by DSM Nutritional Products, Ltd) condition, in a randomized double-blind crossover design with a four-week wash-out period. Subjects were instructed to take the first supplement on the day after the baseline measurements (day 1) and the last supplement in the evening on day 29.
To ensure that the subjects adhered to the study protocol and to confirm systemic conversion of resveratrol to dihydroresveratrol (DHR), total (sum of conjugated and unconjugated resveratrol) and free plasma levels of both compounds were analyzed each week during the 30-day period of resveratrol or placebo supplementation. Whereas no resveratrol or DHR could be detected in the placebo group, both compounds were present in plasma of resveratrol-supplemented subjects (table 2, levels at day 30 are shown and representative for the whole intervention period). Whereas measurement of plasma resveratrol demonstrated compliance to the study protocol and indicated that the compound was well absorbed, measurement of DHR confirmed that resveratrol was efficiently metabolized, especially as the plasma levels of DHR exceeded those of resveratrol after an overnight fast. No detectable levels of free resveratrol and free DHR were observed in the plasma in both the resveratrol and placebo period, also confirming efficient metabolism. It is important to note that although the dosage of 150 mg of resveratrol per day is around 133-266 fold lower compared to the high doses of 200 to 400 mg/kg/day used to supplement mice (Baur et al., 2006; Lagouge et al., 2006), plasma resveratrol levels in our human intervention (231 ng/ml on average during the 30 days) were even higher than those obtained in mice (10-120 ng/ml) (Lagouge et al., 2006). These differences may be due to different metabolic rates of resveratrol between humans and mice, and therefore suggest that resveratrol may exert its effects at different concentration ranges in different mammals.
To ensure that resveratrol supplementation did not cause adverse effects, we screened plasma and blood of the subjects for several general health parameters. Clinical chemistry, hematology and coagulation analysis revealed no adverse effects after 30 days of resveratrol (see table S1 available online). Plasma ALAT concentrations were significantly lower after resveratrol compared to placebo (table 2). Also, leptin levels and leukocytes in the plasma were significantly lower in resveratrol-treated subjects (table 2). In line with the reduced leukocyte count, resveratrol also lowered some markers of systemic inflammation, for including IL-6 and TNF-α (table 2). ECGs were inconspicuous and did not raise clinical concern in any subject. No clinical adverse events were reported during the resveratrol supplementation.
Next, we assessed whether resveratrol also exerted positive effects on plasma markers that predict the metabolic risk for development of diabetes and shorter lifespan. After 30 days of resveratrol, plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were lower compared to placebo (table 2), resulting in a lower HOMA-index, indicative of improved insulin sensitivity (table 2). Plasma triglyceride concentrations were significantly lower after resveratrol compared to placebo. No differences were observed in plasma non-esterified fatty acids (table 2).
As calorie restriction was described to associate with reduced absolute and body weight-adjusted 24-hour energy expenditure and sleeping energy expenditure (Heilbronn et al., 2006), we sought to investigate whether resveratrol treatment induced similar metabolic adaptations. Indeed, resveratrol supplementation for a period of 30 days had a profound effect on resting energy expenditure (table 3). Subjects had a significantly lower sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) compared to placebo, even though 24-hour energy expenditure was similar between resveratrol and placebo (table 3). Although calorie restriction causes metabolic adaptations also partly through weight loss, we found no effect on body mass (99.9 ± 3.9 vs. 99.6 ± 2.5 kg, in resveratrol vs. placebo, p=0.43). Respiratory quotient (RQ) values over 24 hours tended to be higher after resveratrol supplementation, which was largely accounted for by higher RQ values during the daytime (table 3, the complete time-course for the RQ and the energy expenditure over 24 hours is shown in table S2). The higher RQ in the resveratrol group is especially apparent after periods of feeding and suggests improved metabolic flexibility, i.e. the ability to switch between energy substrates. No differences were observed in diet-induced thermogenesis or physical activity index (table 3).
Next, we investigated whether resveratrol also exerted favorable effects on other general health parameters. As long-term calorie restriction in humans (Lefevre et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2006) and resveratrol treatment in mice (Lagouge et al., 2006) was shown to ameliorate cardiac function, we examined whether resveratrol also exerts beneficial effects on blood pressure. Resveratrol significantly lowered systolic blood pressure by ~5 mmHg, while resveratrol had no effect on diastolic blood pressure (table 3). Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower after resveratrol supplementation (table 3).
Mounting evidence implicates SIRT1 as a switch in substrate utilization, for instance from glucose to fatty acid oxidation under low-nutrient conditions (Canto and Auwerx, 2009; Feige et al., 2008). Therefore, we next investigated whether resveratrol is capable to increase fat oxidation in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle after a mixed meal, by stimulating tissue lipolysis. The peak glucose and insulin responses after consuming a liquid test meal were reached after 30 min for placebo and after 60 min for resveratrol (figure 1A,B). There was a tendency for non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) (AUC 4h-6h, p=0.13) and free glycerol (AUC 4h-6h, p=0.06) to be lower in the late postprandial phase after resveratrol (figure 1C,D). Resveratrol did not alter postprandial triglyceride and lactate responses (data not shown). Using the microdialysis technique, ethanol out/in ratios were determined to measure blood flow. At baseline, ethanol out/in ratios were not different after resveratrol supplementation compared to placebo, both in adipose tissue (0.81 ± 0.02 vs. 0.81 ± 0.02, respectively) and skeletal muscle (0.46 ± 0.02 vs. 0.49 ± 0.02, respectively). Furthermore, resveratrol did not affect postprandial adipose tissue and skeletal muscle blood flow (data not shown). The interstitial glycerol concentration in adipose tissue was slightly lower in the resveratrol condition in the mid- and late postprandial phase, although it did not reach statistical significance (AUC 2h-4h, p=0.14; AUC 4h-6h, p=0.13) (figure 1E). There were no differences in interstitial glucose, pyruvate and lactate responses in adipose tissue between placebo and resveratrol (data not shown). For skeletal muscle, there were no differences in interstitial glucose, pyruvate, lactate and glycerol concentrations (glycerol data shown figure 1F). Interestingly, energy expenditure in the postprandial period was significantly lower after resveratrol supplementation (AUC, p=0.02) (figure 1G). During the late postprandial phase (4h-6h), RQ tended to be higher (AUC 4h-6h, p=0.07) (figure 1H) and fat oxidation was decreased in the resveratrol condition (AUC 4h-6h, p=0.007) (figure 1I).
To clarify the mechanism of action of resveratrol, we performed microarray analysis on vastus lateralis muscle biopsies. We found 469 genes to be differentially expressed between placebo and resveratrol supplementation, 219 of which were increased and 250 decreased (figure 2A). We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to define the pathways that were affected by resveratrol, and to compare the expression profile with previous studies in mouse (Lagouge et al., 2006). Several gene sets related to mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation were upregulated, whereas pathways linked to inflammation were downregulated upon resveratrol supplementation (table S3). Indeed, when analyzing expression of the individual genes in the oxidative phosphorylation-related gene sets, we observed a marked increase (figure 2B, left panel), while for cytokine signaling, there was a clear decrease (figure 2B, right panel). Importantly, these effects are highly similar to the effects observed in mice treated with resveratrol (figure 2C), even though the effects in the latter are more pronounced, probably due to longer treatment time and their identical genetic and environmental background.
Since resveratrol was shown to activate AMPK, we measured levels of phosphorylated AMPK on the Thr172 residue of the α-subunit—a marker for its activation. Indeed, increased AMPK phosphorylation was observed in muscle biopsies of the resveratrol-treated subjects (figure 3A, S1A).
Our microarray data clearly suggested strong involvement of mitochondrial function in the beneficial effects of resveratrol. We hence performed some more detailed analyses of mitochondrial function. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in the resveratrol condition was similar to the values obtained after placebo (994.8 ± 101.4 vs. 1074.7 ± 109.9 AU in resveratrol vs. placebo, p=0.20). Also, neither the protein content of the individual structural components of the individual OXPHOS complexes nor the mean of all these complexes revealed differences in mitochondrial density in resveratrol compared to placebo supplementation (figure 3B, S1B). On the other hand, protein content of the AMPK downstream effector SIRT1 (Canto et al., 2009), as well as the mitochondrial master regulator PGC-1α were significantly increased after 30 days of resveratrol (figure 3C, S1C), as was citrate synthase activity (figure 3D), a common marker for mitochondrial activity.
Mitochondrial function can also be assessed in vivo by measurement of phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate after exercise (Schrauwen-Hinderling et al., 2007). To this end, single leg extension exercise was performed for 5 min with a weight corresponding to 60% of maximal capacity, which was determined with an incremental maximal test on the same ergometer on a different day. Low- to medium- intensity exercise was chosen to prevent acidification of the muscle, which is known to affect PCr recovery. Spectra were acquired 2 minutes before exercise, during the 5 minutes of knee extension exercise, and during the subsequent 5 minutes of recovery (rest). As targeted, PCr levels decreased during the knee-extension exercise until a steady state was reached. However, mean PCr recovery half time (PCr-t1/2) was unchanged by resveratrol compared to placebo (figure 3E).
To functionally characterize mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in more detail, we measured mitochondrial respiration using different substrate combinations. State 2 respiration (i.e., respiration in the presence of exogenous substrates alone) was not different between resveratrol versus placebo on any of the substrate combinations studied (data not shown). ADP-stimulated (state 3) respiration on a lipid substrate (malate + octanoyl-carnitine, MO) tended to be higher after resveratrol supplementation (p=0.075, figure 3F). State 3 respiration upon the Complex I-linked substrates malate + glutamate (MG) was unaffected (figure 3G). Respiration upon parallel electron input to both Complex I and II was ~10% higher upon resveratrol. Thus, state 3 respiration upon malate + octanoyl-carnitine + glutamate (MOG) was significantly higher in subjects receiving resveratrol (figure 3H). Similar differences were observed for state 3 respiration upon malate + octanoyl-carnitine + glutamate + succinate (MOGS) (figure 3H), but not in the absence of octanoyl-carnitine (malate + glutamate + succinate, MGS) (figure 3H). Maximal FCCP-induced uncoupled respiration, measured in the presence of octanoyl-carnitine, reflecting the maximal capacity of the electron transport chain, was also higher after 30 days of resveratrol (figure 3I). State 4o respiration (reflecting mitochondrial proton leak) was similar between resveratrol and placebo condition (figure 3J). Similar results were obtained if respiration rates were not corrected for mtDNA copy number.
Since our data show that resveratrol clearly induced a shift in mitochondrial substrate selection, we tested whether this was also reflected in liver and skeletal muscle lipid accumulation. Intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content was lower after 30 days of resveratrol supplementation in comparison to placebo (figure 4A). This was paralleled by lower plasma ALAT values, as mentioned before, both indicating improved liver function. The mean intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) area fraction was ~2-fold higher in the resveratrol group (figure 4B). The increase in lipid accumulation was more pronounced in fibers identified as slow, oxidative (type 1) fibers than in type 2 muscle fibers (figure 4B).
Resveratrol, which was discovered in a small-molecule screen as a potent SIRT1 activator (Howitz et al., 2003), has been extensively studied in animal and cellular studies with promising results (Baur et al., 2006; Lagouge et al., 2006). Here, we show that resveratrol supplementation in humans exerted favorable metabolic adaptations that in many aspects mimic the effects of calorie restriction and/or endurance training (Civitarese et al., 2007; Heilbronn et al., 2006; Larson-Meyer et al., 2006; Larson-Meyer et al., 2008; Lefevre et al., 2009). These metabolic adaptations include a reduction in sleeping metabolic rate, blood pressure and hepatic lipid content, an improvement in skeletal muscle intrinsic mitochondrial function and several plasma markers of general health, an increase in intramyocellular lipid content, as well as an increase in skeletal muscle PGC-1α protein content. These data extend findings, which so far have only been observed in cell and rodent models, to the human situation, showing that resveratrol has promising beneficial metabolic effects, and suggests that resveratrol has the potential to improve metabolic health in subjects at risk for developing the metabolic syndrome.
Resveratrol exerts significant effects on energy metabolism. Sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) was significantly lower following 30 days of resveratrol supplementation, without changing 24-hour energy expenditure. It should be noted that SMR is the component of human energy metabolism that is most sensitive to metabolic changes—as it is not affected by physical activity—and small differences in sleeping energy expenditure can be detected with high accuracy. In line, we observed that basal and postprandial energy expenditure was also lower after 30 days of resveratrol supplementation. The 2-4% reduction in energy expenditure upon resveratrol treatment is consistent with the effects observed after calorie restriction (6% reduction) (Heilbronn et al., 2006; Martin et al., 2007).
It is important to note that basal and postprandial energy expenditure were reduced by resveratrol in our human study rather than increased, as was true for mice (Lagouge et al., 2006). Although our energy expenditure data are opposite to the effects seen in mice, a lowering of resting and sleeping metabolic rate is likely a reflection of improved metabolic efficiency, and completely in line with the endurance training or calorie restriction-like effects of resveratrol (Heilbronn et al., 2006; Martin et al., 2007). Although the dose used in our human study was ~200 fold lower than doses used in the mouse studies, we reached similar plasma resveratrol concentrations. We cannot exclude, however, that metabolism of resveratrol is different between mouse and man, and possibly more importantly that timing of treatment (30 days in our study vs 4-6 months in mice (Baur et al., 2006; Lagouge et al., 2006)) significantly impacts physiological outcome.
Prolonged calorie restriction (during six months) has also been suggested to increase the expression of genes encoding proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and function (Civitarese et al., 2007). Similarly, our microarray data indicate increased mitochondrial gene expression in muscle following resveratrol supplementation. In fact, we showed that this induction is likely to be mediated by AMPK—which is activated by resveratrol—and resulted in increased SIRT1 and PGC-1α protein content, accompanied by increased citrate synthase activity, suggesting that mitochondrial activity was effectively improved. Moreover, detailed mitochondrial characterization revealed that resveratrol had beneficial effects on mitochondrial respiration when octanoyl-carnitine was used a substrate, but not when only glutamate was used. These data suggest that resveratrol specifically improves muscle fat oxidative mitochondrial capacity. Interestingly, we have recently found comparable effects in PGC-1α overexpressing mice, showing an improved intrinsic mitochondrial function (i.e. respiration per mitochondrion) but only when fatty acids are used as a substrate (Hoeks et al., 2011). The fact that mtDNA copy number, OXPHOS protein content, and PCr recovery were not changed in resveratrol-treated subjects suggests that 30 days resveratrol treatment mostly affects mitochondrial efficiency, not abundance. It is well possible that more long-term treatment would cause these parameters to change as well.
Interestingly, IMCL content was markedly increased after 30 days of resveratrol supplementation. Together with the improvement in muscle fat oxidative capacity and the other beneficial metabolic adaptations like lowering of circulating triglyceride and glucose levels, the present data hint towards endurance training-like effects of resveratrol (Dube et al., 2008; Meex et al., 2010). Consistent with data in rats, where resveratrol has been shown to reduce hepatic lipid synthesis (Ahn et al., 2008; Arichi et al., 1982), we observed reduced IHL content. Recent data suggest that endurance training is also able to lower IHL content (Kantartzis et al., 2009), as was calorie restriction, although this effect was mainly attributed to a reduction in body weight (Larson-Meyer et al., 2006; Lim et al., 2011). Taken together with the reduced plasma triglycerides and increased muscle fatty acid oxidation, we hypothesize that fat is liberated from peripheral depots to be metabolized by the muscle. Again, here our data suggest that resveratrol mimics the effect of calorie restriction and endurance training. Also, we have investigated postprandial metabolism, but only found a reduction in total energy expenditure that was reflected by a lower fat oxidation during the late postprandial phase—a change that is reminiscent of the role of SIRT1 in regulating the efficient switch in energy substrate utilization (Canto et al., 2009; Canto et al., 2010). Although postprandial lipolysis tended down, this does not refute our hypothesis of increased fat mobilization, but rather confirms the idea of improved metabolic flexibility.
A striking finding in our study was the resveratrol-induced reduction of systolic blood pressure by 5 mmHg. In rodents, resveratrol is also vasoactive and has been shown to cause vasodilatation and to improve aortic endothelial function in diabetic mice (Wang et al., 2011), to reduce heart rate (Lagouge et al., 2006) and even to lower blood pressure (Rivera et al., 2009). Also in human obese subjects endothelial function and cardiovascular health, dose-dependently improved after one week of resveratrol supplementation (Wong et al., 2010). Similarly, healthy non-obese individuals also improved their cardiovascular risk after six months of calorie restriction as evidenced by a reduction in blood pressure (Lefevre et al., 2009). Another indication that global health was improved upon resveratrol treatment was the decreased expression levels of genes of inflammatory pathways, as were plasma levels of several inflammatory markers, and leukocyte numbers.
Our data also point towards favorable effects on glucose homeostasis after 30 days of resveratrol supplementation in obese subjects. Indeed, HOMA-index was improved after resveratrol, suggesting favorable effects on insulin sensitivity. These beneficial effects of resveratrol on metabolism are in concordance with several findings of resveratrol supplementation in animals (Baur et al., 2006; Canto et al., 2009; Lagouge et al., 2006; Pearson et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2007). Unfortunately, we could not determine if these effects resulted in improved whole body insulin sensitivity.
In conclusion, we demonstrate beneficial effects of resveratrol supplementation for 30 days on the metabolic profile in healthy obese males, which seems to reflect effects observed during calorie restriction (table S4). Although most of the effects that we observed were modest, they were very consistently pointing towards beneficial metabolic adaptations. Furthermore, there were no effects on safety parameters and no adverse events were reported. Therefore, resVida was safe and well tolerated at the tested concentration. Future studies should investigate the long-term and dose-dependent metabolic effects of resveratrol supplementation in order to further establish whether resveratrol supplementation has the potential to overcome the metabolic aberrations that are associated with obesity in humans.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+). All study participants gave written informed consent before initiation of the study.
Eleven healthy, obese, male volunteers without family history of diabetes or any other endocrine disorder participated in this study (Table 1). None of the subjects were on medication or were engaged in sports activities for more than two hours per week. Body composition was determined by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (DXA, Discovery A; Hologic Corp, Bedford, MA) and maximal aerobic capacity was measured as described (Kuipers et al., 1985).
Subjects participated in two experimental trials: a placebo and a resVida™ (150mg/day trans-resveratrol (99.9%) (provided by DSM Nutritional Products, Ltd) condition, in a randomized double-blind crossover design with a four-week wash-out period. Subjects were instructed to take the first supplement on the day after baseline measurements (d1) and the last supplement in the evening on day 29. The subjects were instructed to abstain from alcoholic beverages and foods containing substantial amounts of resveratrol (e.g. wine, red grapes, peanuts and berries) and were advised not to take any other food supplements during the study period. Compliance with these instructions was confirmed by verbal declaration of the subjects. Subjects were advised to maintain their normal living-, activity-, and sleeping-pattern during the intervention period. At the start (day 0) and end (day 30) of both intervention periods (resveratrol and placebo), blood samples were analyzed for general safety parameters including clinical chemistry, hematology and coagulation values. A twelve lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (Laméris, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) was performed at the beginning and end of both the resveratrol and placebo intervention. Each experimental trial lasted four weeks during which the subjects came on a weekly basis (day 0, 7, 14, 21, 30) to the university. The weekly check-up took place in the morning after an overnight fast, and included a measurement of body mass and withdrawal of a small blood sample for the analysis of resveratrol (original and metabolites) to confirm compliance to the protocol. On day 28 in the evening, subjects came to the university for 1H-MRS measurements of the liver, to quantify intrahepatic lipid content, and post-exercise PCr recovery rate was examined by 31P-MRS to estimate in vivo mitochondrial function (Schrauwen-Hinderling et al., 2007). To standardize food intake, subjects had lunch with the same food items in the two conditions and after lunch stayed fasted until the start of the measurement at 17 h.
After the MRS measurements on day 28, subjects stayed in the respiration chamber during 36 h to allow measurement of 24 h substrate oxidation and energy expenditure (Schoffelen et al., 1997). Before their stay in the respiration chamber, a standardized evening meal was provided. In the respiration chamber subjects were fed in energy balance (2332.5 kcal/day, 13.1 g of protein, 54.0 g of carbohydrate, 32.9 g of fat) and followed an activity protocol as described (Schrauwen et al., 1997). In the morning of day 30, after subjects left the respiration chamber, a muscle biopsy was taken to investigate ex vivo mitochondrial respiration, which was followed by the withdrawal of a fasting blood sample for the analysis of the effect of resveratrol on circulating substrates. Hereafter, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle lipolysis was examined by means of microdialysis.
To check compliance, resveratrol metabolites were measured by mass spectrometry in plasma on day 0, 7, 14, 21, 29 and 30 as described in the supplemental methods.
In the morning of day 30 - after a standardized overnight fast for 12 hours - and during the postprandial microdialysis test, blood samples were withdrawn for the determination of plasma metabolites according to standard procedures. Full experimental detail is described in the supplemental methods.
On day 0 and day 30, blood pressure was measured after an overnight fast. By placing an automatic inflatable cuff (Omron Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany) on the non-dominant arm in the resting condition, systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured in triplicate. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were used to calculate the mean arterial pressure.
On day 28, before subjects underwent the respiration chamber measurement, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) was used to quantify hepatic lipid content (IHL) on a 3 T whole body scanner (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) using a five-element coil as described (Hamilton et al., 2011), however with a repetition time = 4000 msec, echo time = 37 msec, and number of averages = 64). To minimize motion artifacts, subjects were asked to breathe in the rhythm of the measurement and to be at end-expiration during acquisition of spectra. To determine the intensity of the lipid peak, the water signal was suppressed using frequency-selective prepulses. The unsuppressed water resonance was used as internal reference (number of averages=32) and spectra were fitted with AMARES (Vanhamme et al., 1997) in the jMURI software (Naressi et al., 2001). Values are given as T2-corrected ratios (according to (Hamilton et al., 2011)) of the CH2 peak, relative to the unsuppressed water resonance (as percentage).
On day 28, 31P-MRS measurements were performed in vastus lateralis muscle on a 1.5 T whole-body scanner (Intera; Philips Health Care, Best, The Netherlands) essentially according to an established methodology (Schrauwen-Hinderling et al., 2007).
On day 30, when subjects left the respiration chamber, a muscle biopsy was taken from the vastus lateralis muscle under local anesthesia (2% lidocaïne), as previously described (Phielix et al., 2008). A portion of the muscle tissue was directly frozen in melting isopentane and stored at −80°C until assayed. Another portion (~30 mg) was immediately placed in ice-cold preservation medium for determination of ex vivo mitochondrial respiration (Phielix et al., 2008).
Mitochondrial DNA copy number, gene expression by microarray, and protein expression by Western blot, were performed according to standard procedures as described in the supplemental methods.
Permeabilized muscle fibers were immediately prepared from the muscle tissue collected in the preservation medium, as described elsewhere (Boushel et al., 2007; Phielix et al., 2008). Subsequently, the permeabilized muscle fibers (~2.5 mg wet weight) were analyzed for mitochondrial function using an oxygraph (OROBOROS Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria) (Hoeks et al., 2010).
Fresh cryosections (5 μm) were stained for intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) by Oil Red O staining combined with fibertyping and immunolabeling of the basal membrane marker laminin to allow quantification of IMCL, as described (Koopman et al., 2001).
In 10 subjects, the lipolytic effects of resveratrol in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle were successfully determined by microdialysis, essentially according to (Goossens et al., 2004). A full description of the microdialysis method is provided as supplemental information.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was performed to evaluate normality distribution. Student’s paired t-test was used to compare placebo and resVida supplementation in normally distributed data, otherwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. For the microdialysis test day, postprandial area under the curve (AUC) of plasma and interstitial metabolites and indirect calorimetry data were calculated using the trapezium rule. In addition to the total AUC (0h-6h after meal ingestion), also the early (0h-2h), mid (2h-4h) and late (4h-6h) AUCs were calculated to obtain more detailed information about the time course of postprandial responses. A P-Value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical program SPSS 16.0 for Mac OS X.
Raw microarray datasets have been submitted to NBCI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE32357).
This study was funded by Top Institute Food and Nutrition. TI Food and Nutrition, formerly known as WCFS, is a unique public/private partnership that generates vision on scientific breakthroughs in food and nutrition, resulting in the development of innovative products and technologies that respond to consumer demands for safe, tasty and healthy foods. Partners are major Dutch food companies and research organizations. A VICI (grant 918.96.618) and a VENI (grant 916.11.136) for innovative research from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) supports the work of P. Schrauwen and V. Schrauwen-Hinderling, respectively. The work in the Auwerx laboratory is supported by the European Research Council (Sirtuins; ERC-2008-AdG231-118), Swiss National Science Foundation, the Velux foundation, and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale. JA is the Nestle Chair in Energy Metabolism. RHH is supported by a Rubicon fellowship of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
The authors would like to thank DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., Kaiseraugst, Switzerland for providing us with the resVida™ and placebo capsules and for performing the resveratrol and dihydroresveratrol analysis. The authors thank Jos Stegen for his excellent technical assistance with the biochemical analysis and Mark Boekschoten from the Netherlands Nutrigenomics Centre for the microarray analysis.