PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2013 December 27; 288(52): 37180–37191.
Published online 2013 November 13. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M113.513598
PMCID: PMC3873572

Cdc48 Chaperone and Adaptor Ubx4 Distribute the Proteasome in the Nucleus for Anaphase Proteolysis*

Abstract

The cell cycle transition is driven by abrupt degradation of key regulators. While ubiquitylation of these proteins has been extensively studied, the requirement for the proteolytic step is less understood. By analyzing the cell cycle function of Cdc48 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found that double mutations in Cdc48 and its adaptor Ubx4 cause mitotic arrest with sustained Clb2 and Cdc20 proteins that are normally degraded in anaphase. The phenotype is neither caused by spindle checkpoint activation nor a defect in the assembly or the activity of the ubiquitylation machinery and the proteasome. Interestingly, the 26S proteasome is mislocalized into foci, which are colocalized with nuclear envelope anchor Sts1 in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells. Moreover, genetic analysis reveals that ubx4 deletion mutant dies in the absence of Rpn4, a transcriptional activator for proteasome subunits, and the proteasome chaperone Ump1, indicating that an optimal level of the proteasome is required for survival. Overexpression of Rpn4 indeed can rescue cell growth and anaphase proteolysis in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells. Biochemical analysis further shows that Ubx4 interacts with the proteasome. Our data propose that Cdc48-Ubx4 acts on the proteasome and uses the chaperone activity to promote its nuclear distribution, thereby optimizing the proteasome level for efficient degradation of mitotic regulators.

Keywords: Aggregation, Cell Cycle, Mitosis, Molecular Chaperone, Proteasome

Introduction

Budding yeast Cdc48 and its metazoan homolog VCP/p97 are highly conserved, abundant, and essential AAA-ATPases that participate in many cellular functions. The protein contains two characteristic AAA domains termed D1 and D2 that bind and hydrolyze ATP. Energy from ATP hydrolysis alters the conformation of Cdc48/VCP/p97 hexamer, which exerts changes in the structure or assembly of its associated target proteins (13). Through specific adaptors, the chaperone activity of Cdc48/VCP/p97 is targeted to components in the ubiquitin-proteasome system, cell cycle control, transcriptional and metabolic regulation, DNA damage response, chromatin remodeling, selective autophagy, and cell death (4).

The adaptors of Cdc48/VCP/p97 include Npl4-Ufd1 complex and a family of proteins containing the ubiquitin regulatory X (UBX)2 domain (5, 6). The UBX domain mediates the interaction with Cdc48/VCP/p97 and is structurally similar to ubiquitin (7). Budding yeast genome predicts seven UBX domain proteins, Ubx1~7, whose functions have not been well determined. Ubx1, also known as Shp1 (suppressor of high copy protein phosphatase 1), is important for mitotic progression (8). Ubx2 and Ubx4 function in endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) (9). While several Ubx members are shown to participate in ubiquitin-dependent degradation of several model substrates (10, 11), their physiological targets are largely elusive.

Cdc48/VCP/p97 is best known to function in ERAD by extracting misfolded proteins from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for subsequent degradation by the proteasome (12). This function is mediated by Npl4-Ufd1 adaptor complex that contains a ubiquitin-binding domain for the recognition of ubiquitylated substrates (13, 14). Thus, Cdc48/VCP/p97 is regarded as a ubiquitin-selective chaperone that segregates ubiquitylated proteins from non-modified partners (15). Cdc48/VCP/p97 also exerts its segregase activity on a variety of targets in other cellular processes.

Besides segregating specific ubiquitylated proteins for degradation, Cdc48/p97/VCP appears to broadly affect the ubiquitin-proteasome system. As a substoichiometric component of the proteasome, Cdc48/p97/VCP facilitates the transfer of ubiquitylated substrates to the proteasome (16). Mature 26S proteasome is composed of catalytic 20S core particle (CP) capped by 19S regulatory particle (RP). In budding yeast, the proteasome is largely localized in the nucleus (17). CP and RP are formed as precursor complexes in the cytoplasm and imported into the nucleus independently of each other, and final maturation of the 26S proteasome occurs in the nucleus (18, 19). The assembly of complete proteasome from subcomplexes is an orderly event orchestrated by specific chaperones (20).

Despite its function in proteostasis, Cdc48 was initially isolated as a metaphase mutant in the budding yeast (21). The metaphase-to-anaphase transition normally requires the E3 ubiquitin protein ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) for the degradation of Securin (Pds1 in budding yeast), mitotic cyclin (Clb2 in budding yeast), and APC/C activator Cdc20. The APC/C activity is blocked by the spindle checkpoint mechanism until metaphase is achieved. Cdc48 is important for metaphase by promoting nuclear localization of type I protein phosphatase (8). In addition, Cdc48 is required for anaphase onset by stabilizing Separase in fission yeast (22), and VCP/p97 antagonizes Aurora B for proper chromosome congression and segregation in animal cells (23).

In this report, we study the function of budding yeast Ubx4 and reveal that Cdc48-Ubx4 is important for mitotic progression. Mutations in Cdc48 and Ubx4 do not directly affect the cell cycle machinery. Rather, they perturb proteasome distribution that impacts on the degradation of mitotic regulators.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Construction of Plasmids and Yeast Strains

All strains are derivatives of W303. Gene deletions, epitope tagging, and PGAL-3HA-UBX4 were generated by PCR-mediated integration (24). PDS1–8myc and mad2Δ were generated as described (8). For 3Flag-tagged wild-type and truncated Ubx4, the promoter region (500 bp upstream of start codon) of UBX4 was cloned at HindIII and BamHI in pRS306, the coding region of full-length, N-terminal (ubx4N, amino acids 1–225) or C-terminal region (ubx4C, amino acids 226–416) of UBX4 at BamHI and XhoI, 3Flag tag at XhoI and SalI, and 500 bp downstream of stop codon at SalI and NotI. The plasmids were linearized with StuI and integrated at URA3 locus. For Rpn4 overexpression, RPN4 sequence with 600 bp upstream and 400 bp downstream regions was cloned at XhoI and NotI in pRS425. For galactose-induced Cdc48 and Cdc48QQ, GAL1 promoter was cloned at XbaI and BamHI, HA tag at BamHI and SmaI, CDC48 coding sequence at HindIII and XhoI in pRS403. For Cdc48QQ, glutamic acid residues at positions 315 and 588 were changed to glutamine by the QuikChange Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA). The plasmids were linearized with NheI to integrate at the HIS3 locus.

Growth of Yeast

Cells were grown in medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, and 2% glucose (YPD) or galactose (YPGal). For microscopy studies, cells were grown in synthetic medium containing 0.67% yeast nitrogen base (YNB), complete supplement mixture (CSM, Bio101, Vista, CA) of amino acids or CSM without specific amino acid for selection, and 2% glucose or galactose. For the synchronized cell cycle, cells were grown in YPGal to mid-log phase at 25 °C and then incubated with 1 μg/ml of α-factor (Sigma) for 3 h to arrest cells at G1 before shifting to YPD plus α-factor for another 3 h. To release from G1 arrest, cells were washed three times with H2O and then resuspended in YPD. α-factor was added back after >90% of cells had budded to block the second cell cycle. For cycloheximide chase experiments, cycloheximide (100 mg/ml stock in DMSO) was added to 1 mg/ml.

Yeast Cell Lysates and Western Blots

Cell lysate preparation for SDS-PAGE and Western blots were performed as described (8). The following antibodies were used: anti-Myc (9E10; Covance, Princeton, NJ), anti-HA (16B12; Covance), anti-Cdc20 (sc-6731; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), anti-yClb2 (sc-9071; Santa Cruz), anti-Flag (M2; Sigma), and anti-Actin (MAB1501; Chemicon, Billerica, MA). Anti-mCherry and anti-GFP antibodies were from Chao-Wen Wang laboratory (IPMB, Academia Sinica).

Proteasome Purification

One liter of cells expressing Pre6-TAP were resuspended in native gel lysis buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm ATP, and 1 mm DTT) and lysed by grinding in liquid nitrogen. Equal amounts of lysates were incubated with IgG Sepharose (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA) at 4 °C for 2 h. The beads were then washed four times with native gel lysis buffer and once with TEV buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mm EDTA, 1 mm DTT), followed by incubation with 100 units of TEV protease (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) overnight at 4 °C. The TEV-released fraction was supplemented with 5 mm CaCl2 and incubated with calmodulin-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA) at 4 °C for 2 h. The beads were then washed 4 times with Calmodulin wash buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 10% glycerol, 3 mm DTT, 1 mm MgCl2, 2 mm CaCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) and another four times with 25 mm NH4HCO3, followed by denaturation in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. 10% of the sample was loaded onto a 10–20% gradient gel and stained by Sypro Ruby (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The gel was scanned with Typhoon FLA 9000 (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA).

Proteasome Non-denaturing Gel

Cells at mid-log phase were collected and lysed by bead-beating 5 times for 1 min each with 3-min interval in lysis buffer containing 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm DTT, 1 mm ATP, 10% glycerol, 1 mm PMSF, 10 μg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and chymostatin. The samples were clarified by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration in the supernatant was measured and adjusted to 10 μg/μl. A 5× loading dye (250 mm Tris, pH 8.0, 50% glycerol, 0.02% bromphenol blue) was added to the lysate, and 2 μl of the samples were loaded onto 4% acrylamide gel made in the non-denaturing gel buffer (50 mm Tris, 50 mm boric acid, 5 mm MgCl2, 1 mm ATP, and 1 mm DTT). The gel was run in the non-denaturing gel buffer at 100 V for 4.5 h at 4 °C, and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for Western blotting with anti-CP (BML-PW9355; Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY), anti-Rpn5 (ab79773; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-Blm10 (BMW-PW0570; Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY).

In-gel Proteasome Activity Assay

Yeast spheroplasts were prepared and lysed by bead-beating in native gel lysis buffer. Lysate of 100 μg of total protein was resolved by 4% non-denaturing gel. The gel was run at 100 V for 4 h at 4 °C and then incubated in 15 ml of 40 μm Suc-LLVY-AMC in buffer A (25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mm MgCl2, 1 mm ATP, 1 mm DTT, and 10% glycerol [v/v]) at 30 °C for 30 min. Immediately after visualization of the fluorescent signals of RP-CP and RP-CP-RP by UV transilluminator (UVP 600, Upland, CA), SDS was added to 0.02% in buffer A to detect CP.

Fluorescence Microscopy

Images were taken using a 100 × 1.4 N/A lens and CoolSNAP HQ2 CCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) on an Olympus IX71 fluorescence microscope controlled by DeltaVision system (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA). Z-stacks of 13 optical sections with spacing of 0.4 μm were collected and processed by Softworx software.

FRAP Analysis

The experiment was carried out on Zeiss LSM510 META confocal microscope equipped with EC Plan-NEOFLUA 40×/1.3 oil objective and an objective heater to maintain the sample at 25 °C. A 0.9 milliwatt argon laser was set at 85% of power. Images were collected with a pinhole of 10.77 airy units (AU) for optimal signal intensity. The sample was first scanned five times (5× zoom at 0.8% of laser power) to measure the fluorescence intensity before photobleaching, followed by 10 iterative laser pulses at full power to photobleach a circular area of ~1.144 μm in diameter in the nucleus. Fluorescence recovery was monitored every 500 ms. The fluorescence intensity values were exported from LSM software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) to Excel. Intensity (Fs) was corrected for background noise by subtracting the intensity in a nearby region without any cell (Fb) and normalized by the spontaneous photobleaching rate (r), which is determined by comparing the fluorescence of the control region before (FC0) and after (Fc) photobleaching (r = FC/FC0). The normalized intensity F = (Fs-Fb)/r. The recovery t1/2 was calculated by Zeiss FRAP software and expressed as average± S.D.

Cim5-TAP Pull-down

The pull-down was carried out as described (25). Briefly, yeast cultures at A600 of 1~2 were harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were washed in ice-cold water and lysed with native lysis buffer (50 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 15% glycerol, 25 mm β-glycerophosphate, 25 mm NEM, 10 μg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and chymostatin, 2 mm ATP, 5 mm MgCl2, and 2 mm CaCl2) by mixing the cell pellet with an equal volume of Zirconia beads and beating for 1.5 min at 4 °C. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were mixed with calmodulin-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) for 3 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed four times with native lysis buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and twice with wash buffer containing 25 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mm MgCl2, 2 mm ATP. The bound proteins were then solubilized by heating to 95 °C in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.

In Vitro APC/C Assay

APC/C subunit Cdc16 was tagged with TAP and purified sequentially by IgG-Sepharose and then by calmodulin-Sepharose beads as described previously (26). APC activator Cdc20 and the substrate Pds1 were transcribed and translated in vitro with TnT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). For Pds1, [35S]methionine was added during the reaction. APC/C assays were performed as described (26). The reactions were incubated at 25 °C, and aliquots were taken and stopped by the addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer at indicated times. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and the dried gel was exposed to a Phosphor screen (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA), which was then scanned by Typhoon FLA 9000 (GE Healthcare) and quantified by ImageQuant software.

RESULTS

cdc48-3 ubx4 Double Mutant Is Delayed in Mitosis

Cdc48 functions in diverse cellular processes through specific adaptors. The UBX domain-containing adaptor Ubx1/Shp1 is required for mitotic progression (8). Unlike UBX1, the other UBX members, UBX2~7, are not essential for vegetative cell growth. Interestingly, we found that deletion of UBX4 was synthetic-lethal with the temperature-sensitive cdc48-3 mutant (data not shown). To determine the terminal phenotype of cdc48-3 ubx4Δ double mutant, we conditionally expressed UBX4 by replacing its promoter with galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter and added HA3 tag at the N terminus of Ubx4. The resulting strain PGAL-3HA-UBX4 with or without cdc48-3 mutation can grow on galactose-containing plate, whereas cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 strain cannot survive on the glucose-containing plate even at permissive temperature for cdc48-3 (Fig. 1A). This result is consistent with the synthetic lethality of cdc48-3 ubx4Δ. We hereafter refer to PGAL-3HA-UBX4 and cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells shifted from galactose to glucose medium as ubx4 and cdc48-3 ubx4, respectively.

FIGURE 1.
cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant is delayed at mitosis. A, ubx4 is synthetic-lethal with cdc48-3. Cells with their genotype indicated on top were streaked out on plates containing galactose (YPGal) or glucose (YPD) to activate or suppress, respectively, UBX4 ...

To determine whether cdc48-3 ubx4 cells had any defect in cell cycle progression, we measured their DNA content in a synchronized cell cycle after release from G1 arrest by α-factor. The fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis shows that cdc48-3 ubx4 cells maintained 2N DNA content even at 4 h after release into the cell cycle, while the majority of wild-type, cdc48-3, and ubx4 cells had exited mitosis (Fig. 1B). This result shows that cdc48-3 ubx4 cells are delayed in mitosis.

We next examined the levels of various mitotic regulators by Western blots to determine what stage of mitosis was affected in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells. The anaphase inhibitor Pds1 that accumulates from S to M phase and is degraded after anaphase onset showed a similar pattern of expression during the synchronized cell cycle in wild-type and ubx4 cells (Fig. 1C). Pds1 also accumulated with similar kinetics in cdc48-3 and cdc48-3 ubx4 mutants, but its decline was slightly delayed in cdc48-3 and further delayed in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 1C). Similarly, mitotic cyclin Clb2 and APC/C activator Cdc20 disappeared with slower kinetics in cdc48-3 and cdc48-3 ubx4 than in wild-type and ubx4 cells (Fig. 1C). These results show that cdc48-3 ubx4 cells are delayed at the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Mitotic Delay in cdc48-3 ubx4 Is Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint and APC/C

Pds1, Clb2, and Cdc20 are ubiquitylated by APC/C after all kinetochores are properly attached to spindle microtubules. We have previously shown that cdc48-3 at non-permissive temperature affects kinetochore bi-orientation, leading to activation of the spindle checkpoint and block of anaphase onset (8). Thus, the delayed degradation of APC/C substrates in cdc48-3 and cdc48-3 ubx4 mutants at permissive temperature may be due to partial activation of the spindle checkpoint. We thus asked whether deletion of the evolutionarily conserved spindle checkpoint gene MAD2 may suppress the degradation defect. We did not include Pds1 in this experiment, because the effect of cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations on Pds1 was minor compared with Clb2 and Cdc20 (Fig. 1C). Western blots show that MAD2 deletion did not accelerate the decline of Clb2 and Cdc20 levels after mitosis in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells to the kinetics in cdc48-3 (Fig. 2A). Deletion of another spindle checkpoint gene MAD3 also gave the same result (data not shown). Therefore, the anaphase delay of cdc48-3 ubx4 was not due to activation of the spindle checkpoint.

FIGURE 2.
Clb2 and Cdc20 degradation defect in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant is independent of the spindle checkpoint. A, MAD2 deletion does not rescue the degradation defect in cdc48-3 ubx4. Cells were first arrested at G1 by α-factor and then released into ...

Cdc20 is rapidly turned over from late mitosis until G1 phase. We thus determined if cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations also affect Cdc20 protein stability at G1. We used cells deleted for MAD2 to avoid any effect from the spindle checkpoint that may interfere with G1 arrest. Because Cdc20 exists at a low level at G1, we expressed 4myc-tagged Cdc20 to enhance detection. After adding cycloheximide to block protein synthesis at G1, 4myc-Cdc20 disappeared by 5 min in mad2Δ and ubx4 mad2Δ, whereas about 40 and 60% of original 4myc-Cdc20 level remained in cdc48-3 mad2Δ and cdc48-3 ubx4 mad2Δ, respectively (Fig. 2B). In addition, the steady-state level of 4myc-Cdc20 (time 0, before cycloheximide addition) was elevated in cdc48-3 ubx4 mad2Δ (Fig. 2B). These results show that cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations delayed Cdc20 degradation at G1, supporting the notion that the degradation defect of APC/C substrates in cdc48-3 ubx4 mutant is independent of the spindle checkpoint or a failure to exit mitosis.

We next asked whether cdc48-3 ubx4 mutations may perturb APC/C function. We performed tandem affinity purification (TAP) on the APC/C subunit Cdc16 and found that the associated APC/C components were essentially the same between wild-type and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 3A), indicating that the mutations did not affect the assembly of APC/C. Furthermore, in vitro APC/C assay shows that APC purified from wild-type and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells ubiquitylated the substrate [35S]Pds1 to the same degree and with similar kinetics (Fig. 3B), indicating that APC/C activity was intact. Therefore, the inability to efficiently degrade Clb2 and Cdc20 in cdc48-3 ubx4 is not caused by a defect in APC/C.

FIGURE 3.
The assembly and activity of APC/C are intact in cdc48-3 ubx4 mutant. A, APC/C subunit Cdc16 was tagged with TAP and purified from wild-type or cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells that were first grown in YPGal and then shifted to YPD for 4 h. The samples were ...

cdc48-3 ubx4 Mutations Have No Gross Effect on Proteasome Assembly or Activity

We next determined whether cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations affect proteasome function. TAP of Pre6, α4 subunit of the CP, shows that proteins associated with Pre6-TAP were similar in cdc48-3 and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 4A). Mass spectrometry analysis further confirmed that the protein complex consisted of subunits in the RP and the CP (data not shown), indicating that cdc48-3 ubx4 mutations do not affect the assembly of 26S proteasome. We also analyzed proteasome architecture by Western blotting of non-denaturing gels. We used anti-Rpn5 antibody to detect the RP and found that the levels of the CP associated with one (RP-CP) or two RP (RP-CP-RP) were similar between wild-type, cdc48-3, ubx4, and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 4B). The Western blot of Blm10, another CP activator (27), also shows comparable levels of RP-CP-Blm10, Blm10-CP-Blm10, and Blm10-CP among these strains (Fig. 4B). Consistent with these results, Western blotting with anti-CP antibody shows that cdc48-3 ubx4 mutations did not affect the assembly of CP with RP and Blm10 (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, in-gel peptidase assay using the fluorogenic substrate Suc-LLVY-AMC shows comparable activities of RP-CP-RP and RP-CP between wild-type, cdc48-3, ubx4, and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 4C). Incubation of the non-denaturing gel with SDS to allow access to the catalytic core of the CP shows similar activities of CP and Blm10-CP among these strains (Fig. 4C). Together, these results suggest that cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations do not affect the structural integrity and the activity of 26S proteasome.

FIGURE 4.
Structure and activity of the 26S proteasome are intact in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells. A, pre6-TAP was purified from cdc48-3 and cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells that were first grown in YPGal and then shifted to YPD. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, followed ...

To investigate the effect of cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations on the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vivo, we examined several unstable proteins, including the model substrates Deg1-GFP, Deg-NLS-GFP (Deg1-GFP with nuclear localization signal), CPY*-HA, and G1 regulator Far1. Except for the ERAD substrate CPY*-HA, none of the other substrates were significantly stabilized in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (data not shown). Thus, cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutations do not have a general effect on the degradation of short-lived proteins, consistent with the notion that both structure and activity of the proteasome are intact. Nevertheless, tetrad analysis shows that ubx4Δ was synthetic-lethal with deletion of both CP chaperone UMP1 (Fig. 4D) and RPN4, the transcriptional activator for proteasome subunits (Fig. 4E), indicating that the mutant was sensitive to perturbation of proteasome biogenesis.

Proteasomes Form Nuclear Foci in cdc48-3 ubx4

We next examined the subcellular distribution of proteasomes by tagging Pre6 with GFP. Pre6-GFP was largely localized in the whole nucleus of wild-type and ubx4 cells (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, ~50% of cdc48-3 cells in glucose medium showed a small puncta of Pre6-GFP signal at the nuclear periphery in addition to the signal in the nucleoplasm (Fig. 5, A and B). The small Pre6-GFP puncta also existed in cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells grown in galactose-containing medium (Fig. 5A). However, upon depletion of Ubx4 by glucose, ~80% of cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells showed one dot of Pre6-GFP signal that was larger and brighter than the puncta found in cdc48-3 (Fig. 5, A and B). Similarly, GFP-tagged Pre2, β5 subunit of CP, and RP subunits Cim5 and Rpn11 also formed foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 5C). These results suggest that the 26S proteasome was abnormally clustered at nuclear periphery.

FIGURE 5.
cdc48-3 ubx4 mutations affect 26S proteasome localization. A, cells expressing GFP-tagged CP subunit Pre6 were grown in synthetic complete medium containing galactose or glucose and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. B, results in A were quantified ...

We further examined whether Pre6-GFP foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells might represent stable aggregates of the proteasome. We performed fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis and found that nuclear Pre6-GFP in wild-type cells was quickly recovered upon photobleaching with t1/2 ~0.66 s (Fig. 5D), indicating that the proteasome is highly mobile in the nucleus. Photobleaching the Pre6-GFP foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells showed a slightly slower recovery rate of t1/2 ~1.45 s (Fig. 5D), suggesting that Pre6-GFP foci are dynamic structures, not stable aggregates.

Proteasomes Congregate with Nuclear Envelope Anchor Sts1 in cdc48-3 ubx4

By labeling the nuclear envelope with mCherry-tagged nuclear pore complex subunit Nup49, we found that Pre6-GFP foci localized to the nucleoplasmic side of the nuclear envelope in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 6A). Thus, Cdc48-Ubx4 is important for nuclear distribution, but not import, of the proteasome.

FIGURE 6.
Pre6 is congregated with Sts1 at nuclear periphery in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells. A, Pre6-GFP foci reside at the inner side of the nuclear envelope. cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells expressing Pre6-GFP and Nup49-mCherry were grown in medium containing glucose. Maximum ...

Previous study has shown that the fission yeast nuclear membrane protein Cut8 provides an anchor for the proteasome to enrich at the nuclear periphery (28). Our result of proteasome foci at the nuclear envelope of cdc48-3 ubx4 cells suggests that the proteasome might be retained at the nuclear membrane. We thus examined the localization of Sts1, a budding yeast homolog of Cut8, by tagging the protein with mCherry. Sts1-mCherry signal was weak and mostly localized to the nucleus in both wild-type and ubx4 cells (Fig. 6B), but it appeared as a small dot at the nuclear periphery in a fraction of cdc48-3 cells (Fig. 6B). The Sts1-mCherry dot was co-localized with Pre6-GFP and became larger and brighter in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 6B), showing that Sts1 and the proteasome were congregated together in the mutants.

A possibility exists that the clustering of Sts1 and the proteasome is caused by misregulation of Sts1. Based on the fact that fission yeast Cut8 is a short-lived protein that is degraded upon its polyubiquitylation and association with the proteasome (28), we asked whether Sts1 protein level might be altered by cdc48-3 ubx4 mutations. Western blot result shows that Sts1-mCherry protein levels were similar in wild-type, cdc48-3, ubx4, and cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 6C), indicating that the formation of Sts1 and proteasome foci was not caused by a change of Sts1 protein stability.

We speculated that Cdc48 may employ its chaperone activity to distribute the proteasome in the nucleus. We tested this possibility by overexpressing dominant-negative Cdc48QQ mutant that blocks ATP hydrolysis (13). Induction of Cdc48QQ, but not wild-type Cdc48, through GAL1 promoter caused a metaphase arrest (data not shown). Upon Cdc48QQ expression, Pre6-GFP formed perinuclear foci similar to that in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells (Fig. 6D). The foci were also co-localized with Sts1-mCherry signal (Fig. 6D). This result shows that ATP hydrolysis of Cdc48 is important for proteasome distribution in the nucleus.

Rpn4 Overexpression Rescues the Phenotypes in cdc48-3 ubx4

We performed a high-copy suppressor screen and identified RPN4 that on a 2μ plasmid rescued the viability of cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 cells on the glucose-containing plate (Fig. 7A). Consistent with the cell growth, a high copy of RPN4 advanced the degradation of Clb2 and Cdc20 proteins in cdc48-3 ubx4 mad2Δ cells to similar kinetics as in cdc48-3 mad2Δ (Fig. 7B), although it did not restore normal proteasome distribution (data not shown). RPN4 encodes a transcription factor that binds the promoter of many genes in the ubiquitin-proteasome system and up-regulates the expression of proteasome subunits when proteasome function is compromised (29, 30). The result suggests that elevating the proteasome concentration can overcome the defect caused by proteasome clustering, supporting the notion that anaphase proteolysis requires an optimal level of the proteasome.

FIGURE 7.
Overexpression of Rpn4 suppresses cdc48-3 ubx4 phenotypes. A, cells carrying high-copy 2μ plasmid pRS425 without (−) or with (+) RPN4 were spotted in 10-fold serial dilutions from left to right on selection plates containing galactose ...

Ubx4 Associates with the Proteasome

Cdc48 may disassemble the proteasome from its anchor at the nuclear envelope to mobilize the proteasome in the nucleus. It is possible that Ubx4 mediates this chaperone function of Cdc48 by interacting with the proteasome. Ubx4 contains a putative ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain at its N terminus and a UBX domain at the C terminus (Fig. 8A). UBL domain shares high similarity with ubiquitin and is a proteasome-binding motif in other proteins (31). We first determined which region of Ubx4 was required for viability in cdc48-3 strain. We expressed 3Flag-tagged Ubx4, Ubx4N (amino acids 1–225), or Ubx4C (amino acids 226–416) in cdc48-3 PGAL-3HA-UBX4 strains and found that only full-length Ubx4-3Flag, but not the truncated proteins, supported cell growth on glucose-containing plate (Fig. 8B). This result shows that both UBL and UBX domains are important for the function of Ubx4. To determine if Ubx4 associates with the proteasome, we expressed Cim5-TAP in cells expressing 3Flag-tagged Ubx4, Ubx4N, and Ubx4C. Western blots show that the full-length and truncated proteins were present in Cim5-TAP pull-down (Fig. 8C), indicating that both N- and C-terminal regions of Ubx4 are involved in the interaction with the proteasome. Thus, Cdc48-Ubx4 may act directly on the proteasome to promote its distribution in the nucleus.

FIGURE 8.
Both UBL and UBX domains of Ubx4 are involved in the interaction with the proteasome. A, schematic representations of domain structures in Ubx4 and deletion mutants used in this study. B, both UBL and UBX domains are required for viability in cdc48-3 ...

DISCUSSION

Cdc48/VCP/p97 controls a variety of cellular processes through specific adaptors including the family of UBX domain proteins whose functions have not been well determined. Ubx4 was previously shown to be involved in ERAD and degradation of several model substrates (9, 32). In this report we demonstrate that Cdc48 together with Ubx4 are important for nuclear distribution of the 26S proteasome. Defects in this process perturb degradation of mitotic proteins Clb2 and Cdc20, leading to mitotic arrest.

We found that ubx4Δ is synthetic-lethal with cdc48-3 and that suppressing UBX4 expression in cdc48-3 cells has drastic effect on mitotic progression and proteasome distribution even at permissive temperature for cdc48-3. The lack of obvious phenotypes in ubx4Δ or in Ubx4-depleted cells suggests that another Cdc48 adaptor shares a similar function with Ubx4 and can support the function in the absence of Ubx4. The partially compromised activity of cdc48-3 at permissive temperature may work through both Ubx4 and the other redundant adaptor, causing only minor phenotypes of slight mitotic delay and small proteasome puncta in cdc48-3 cells. However, the other adaptor alone in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant may not be sufficient to maintain Cdc48 function, resulting in further compromised activity and enhanced phenotypes of large proteasome foci and mitotic arrest. This possibility predicts that deletion of both adaptors is likely lethal and would produce phenotypes similar to that of cdc48-3 ubx4. Previous finding shows that UBX4, UBX6, and UBX7 share redundant functions, since the triple deletion mutant is deficient in sporulation and degradation of model substrates (32). However, the triple mutant is viable under normal growth condition (32), suggesting that Ubx6 and Ubx7 are unlikely the redundant adaptors that share the function with Ubx4 in mitosis. Whether the putative redundant adaptor is another UBX domain protein or a novel molecule awaits future investigation.

We discover that proteasomes are mislocalized into foci at the inner side of the nuclear envelope in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant (Figs. 5 and and6).6). The foci likely contain the 26S proteasome, because subunits in both CP and RP form foci (Fig. 5, A–C). In mammalian cells, the inhibition of proteasome function or the overproduction of inefficiently folded or assembled proteins leads to the formation of centrosome-associated inclusions, termed aggresomes, that contain proteasome, ubiquitin, undegradable protein substrates and cytosolic chaperones (33). Similar structures have also been reported in budding yeast upon overexpression of human huntingtin protein with an expanded polyglutamine domain (34). However, inhibiting proteasome function by MG132 or mutations in the proteasome subunits do not cause proteasome aggregation in budding yeast (our unpublished results). Thus, the proteasome foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells are distinct from the aggresome in mammalian cells.

The 26S proteasome in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells is largely intact. By non-denaturing gel analysis of the proteasome, we demonstrate that CP can still assemble with its activator RP or Blm10 in cdc48-3 ubx4 cells and that the mutations have no apparent effect on the in-gel peptidase activity of the proteasome (Fig. 4). Interestingly, we found that ubx4Δ is synthetic-lethal with ump1Δ (Fig. 4D) and with rpn4Δ (Fig. 4E), indicating that optimal proteasome biogenesis is required for cell survival. However, the proteasome foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant are unlikely caused by impaired proteasome biogenesis, because we did not find a similar phenotype in cells with defective CP assembly due to the expression of C-terminal truncated Pre4 or HA-tagged Ump1.3

It has been shown that the proteasome is dynamically localized in budding yeast cells. It accumulates in the nucleus during exponential growth. At the transition from exponential to stationary phase, the proteasome is first enriched at the nuclear periphery, then forms immobile dots close to the nuclear periphery, and eventually accumulates as cytoplasmic storage granules (35). Interestingly, the proteasome foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant resemble that in cells of early stationary phase, indicating that proteasomes may accumulate at the foci through a physiological process. Our FRAP analysis shows that proteasomes in the foci are turned over with a half-life of ~1.45 s, which is slower than that of nuclear proteasomes in normal cells (~0.66 s) (Fig. 5D). Thus, proteasomes are likely retained but not aggregated in the foci. Fission yeast proteasomes are enriched at the nuclear envelope via the nuclear envelope protein Cut8 that interacts with and tethers the proteasome (28). Cut8 homolog Sts1 in budding yeast is also important for nuclear accumulation of the proteasome (36). We discover that the proteasome foci in cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutants are colocalized with Sts1 (Fig. 6B), raising a possibility that the proteasome is retained at the nuclear envelope through Sts1. Because Cdc48 is known to function as a segregase to extract proteins, Cdc48-Ubx4 may facilitate the release of proteasomes from Sts1. The formation of proteasome and Sts1 foci by ATPase-defective Cdc48QQ mutant (Fig. 6D) indicates that Cdc48 may exert its chaperone activity during ATP hydrolysis to promote proteasome distribution.

cdc48-3 ubx4 double mutant is defective in the degradation of mitotic proteins Clb2 and Cdc20, causing a delay in anaphase. This defect is likely a result of proteasome clustering at the nuclear envelope that reduces the level of available proteasomes. This notion is supported by the finding that the growth and proteolytic defects of cdc48-3 ubx4 can be rescued by up-regulation of proteasome gene expression through Rpn4. Clb2 and Cdc20 seem to be more sensitive to proteasome mislocalization than several other short-lived proteins tested. Consistent with this notion, temperature sensitive sts1 was originally isolated as a metaphase mutant and named as dbf8 (for dumbbell former 8) (37). Similarly, mutations in cut8, the fission yeast homolog of STS1, also perturb anaphase and produce a “cut” phenotype (38). Together, these findings demonstrate that proteasome mislocalization impacts on mitosis and that efficient degradation of mitotic regulators requires an optimal level of the proteasome. Our study provides a further link between mitotic progression and proteasome homeostasis mediated by Cdc48-Ubx4.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Chao-Wen Wang for sharing reagents and providing scientific inputs, Po-Lin Yang for critically reading the manuscript, and Sue-Ping Lee (IMB Imaging Core) for technical assistance in imaging, and Dr. Tuan-Nan Wen (IPMB Proteomics Core) for mass spectrometry analysis.

*This study was supported by grants from Academia Sinica and National Science Council, Taiwan.

3C.-Y. Chien and R.-H. Chen, unpublished result.

2The abbreviations used are:

UBX
ubiquitin regulatory X
ERAD
endoplasmic reticulum- associated protein degradation
CP
core particle
RP
regulatory particle
APC/C
anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome
TAP
tandem affinity purification
FRAP
fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

REFERENCES

1. Pye V. E., Dreveny I., Briggs L. C., Sands C., Beuron F., Zhang X., Freemont P. S. (2006) Going through the motions: the ATPase cycle of p97. J. Struct. Biol. 156, 12–28 [PubMed]
2. DeLaBarre B., Brunger A. T. (2005) Nucleotide dependent motion and mechanism of action of p97/VCP. J. Mol. Biol. 347, 437–452 [PubMed]
3. Davies J. M., Tsuruta H., May A. P., Weis W. I. (2005) Conformational changes of p97 during nucleotide hydrolysis determined by small-angle X-Ray scattering. Structure 13, 183–195 [PubMed]
4. Meyer H., Bug M., Bremer S. (2012) Emerging functions of the VCP/p97 AAA-ATPase in the ubiquitin system. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 117–123 [PubMed]
5. Buchberger A. (2002) From UBA to UBX: new words in the ubiquitin vocabulary. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 216–221 [PubMed]
6. Kloppsteck P., Ewens C. A., Förster A., Zhang X., Freemont P. S. (2012) Regulation of p97 in the ubiquitin-proteasome system by the UBX protein-family. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 125–129 [PubMed]
7. Yuan X., Shaw A., Zhang X., Kondo H., Lally J., Freemont P. S., Matthews S. (2001) Solution structure and interaction surface of the C-terminal domain from p47: a major p97-cofactor involved in SNARE disassembly. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 255–263 [PubMed]
8. Cheng Y. L., Chen R. H. (2010) The AAA-ATPase Cdc48 and cofactor Shp1 promote chromosome bi-orientation by balancing Aurora B activity. J. Cell Sci. 123, 2025–2034 [PubMed]
9. Alberts S. M., Sonntag C., Schäfer A., Wolf D. H. (2009) Ubx4 modulates cdc48 activity and influences degradation of misfolded proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 16082–16089 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Hartmann-Petersen R., Wallace M., Hofmann K., Koch G., Johnsen A. H., Hendil K. B., Gordon C. (2004) The Ubx2 and Ubx3 cofactors direct Cdc48 activity to proteolytic and nonproteolytic ubiquitin-dependent processes. Curr. Biol. 14, 824–828 [PubMed]
11. Schuberth C., Richly H., Rumpf S., Buchberger A. (2004) Shp1 and Ubx2 are adaptors of Cdc48 involved in ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. EMBO Rep. 5, 818–824 [PubMed]
12. Wolf D. H., Stolz A. (2012) The Cdc48 machine in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 117–124 [PubMed]
13. Ye Y., Meyer H. H., Rapoport T. A. (2001) The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol. Nature 414, 652–656 [PubMed]
14. Bays N. W., Wilhovsky S. K., Goradia A., Hodgkiss-Harlow K., Hampton R. Y. (2001) HRD4/NPL4 is required for the proteasomal processing of ubiquitinated ER proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 4114–4128 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Braun S., Matuschewski K., Rape M., Thoms S., Jentsch S. (2002) Role of the ubiquitin-selective CDC48(UFD1/NPL4)chaperone (segregase) in ERAD of OLE1 and other substrates. EMBO J. 21, 615–621 [PubMed]
16. Elsasser S., Finley D. (2005) Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 742–749 [PubMed]
17. Enenkel C., Lehmann A., Kloetzel P. M. (1998) Subcellular distribution of proteasomes implicates a major location of protein degradation in the nuclear envelope-ER network in yeast. EMBO J. 17, 6144–6154 [PubMed]
18. Lehmann A., Janek K., Braun B., Kloetzel P. M., Enenkel C. (2002) 20 S proteasomes are imported as precursor complexes into the nucleus of yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 317, 401–413 [PubMed]
19. Isono E., Nishihara K., Saeki Y., Yashiroda H., Kamata N., Ge L., Ueda T., Kikuchi Y., Tanaka K., Nakano A., Toh-e A. (2007) The assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 569–580 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Tomko R. J., Jr., Hochstrasser M. (2011) Order of the proteasomal ATPases and eukaryotic proteasome assembly. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 60, 13–20 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Moir D., Stewart S. E., Osmond B. C., Botstein D. (1982) Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: isolation, properties, and pseudoreversion studies. Genetics 100, 547–563 [PubMed]
22. Ikai N., Yanagida M. (2006) Cdc48 is required for the stability of Cut1/separase in mitotic anaphase. J. Struct. Biol. 156, 50–61 [PubMed]
23. Dobrynin G., Popp O., Romer T., Bremer S., Schmitz M. H., Gerlich D. W., Meyer H. (2011) Cdc48/p97-Ufd1-Npl4 antagonizes Aurora B during chromosome segregation in HeLa cells. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1571–1580 [PubMed]
24. Longtine M. S., McKenzie A., 3rd, Demarini D. J., Shah N. G., Wach A., Brachat A., Philippsen P., Pringle J. R. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 [PubMed]
25. Gomez T. A., Kolawa N., Gee M., Sweredoski M. J., Deshaies R. J. (2011) Identification of a functional docking site in the Rpn1 LRR domain for the UBA-UBL domain protein Ddi1. BMC Biol. 9, 33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Schuyler S. C., Murray A. W. (2009) An in vitro assay for Cdc20-dependent mitotic anaphase-promoting complex activity from budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 545, 271–285 [PubMed]
27. Schmidt M., Haas W., Crosas B., Santamaria P. G., Gygi S. P., Walz T., Finley D. (2005) The HEAT repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 294–303 [PubMed]
28. Takeda K., Yanagida M. (2005) Regulation of nuclear proteasome by Rhp6/Ubc2 through ubiquitination and destruction of the sensor and anchor Cut8. Cell 122, 393–405 [PubMed]
29. Xie Y., Varshavsky A. (2001) RPN4 is a ligand, substrate, and transcriptional regulator of the 26S proteasome: a negative feedback circuit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 3056–3061 [PubMed]
30. London M. K., Keck B. I., Ramos P. C., Dohmen R. J. (2004) Regulatory mechanisms controlling biogenesis of ubiquitin and the proteasome. FEBS Lett. 567, 259–264 [PubMed]
31. Hartmann-Petersen R., Gordon C. (2004) Integral UBL domain proteins: a family of proteasome interacting proteins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 247–259 [PubMed]
32. Decottignies A., Evain A., Ghislain M. (2004) Binding of Cdc48p to a ubiquitin-related UBX domain from novel yeast proteins involved in intracellular proteolysis and sporulation. Yeast 21, 127–139 [PubMed]
33. Kopito R. R. (2000) Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 524–530 [PubMed]
34. Wang Y., Meriin A. B., Zaarur N., Romanova N. V., Chernoff Y. O., Costello C. E., Sherman M. Y. (2009) Abnormal proteins can form aggresome in yeast: aggresome-targeting signals and components of the machinery. FASEB J. 23, 451–463 [PubMed]
35. Laporte D., Salin B., Daignan-Fornier B., Sagot I. (2008) Reversible cytoplasmic localization of the proteasome in quiescent yeast cells. J. Cell Biol. 181, 737–745 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Chen L., Romero L., Chuang S. M., Tournier V., Joshi K. K., Lee J. A., Kovvali G., Madura K. (2011) Sts1 plays a key role in targeting proteasomes to the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 3104–3118 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Houman F., Holm C. (1994) DBF8, an essential gene required for efficient chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6350–6360 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Samejima I., Yanagida M. (1994) Identification of cut8+ and cek1+, a novel protein kinase gene, which complement a fission yeast mutation that blocks anaphase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6361–6371 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology