PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
From:
Published online 2013 December 17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082853

Table 3

Mean differences estimated from the random effects network meta-analysis model
BW (kg)WC (cm)WHRFM (kg)LBM (kg)
AET versus
RT−1.34 [−2.28, 0.094]−1.3[−2.45, 0.058]−0.006 [−0.022, 0.011]−1.00[−1.90, 0.34]−1.30 [−3.24, 0.74]
CT versus
AET−0.22 [−2.21, 1.11]−0.22[−2.09, 1.29]−0.049 [−0.10, 0.009]−0.72[−2.20, 0.469]0.75 [−2.99, 2.77]
CT versus
RT−1.59 [−3.17, 0.058]−1.54 [−3.32, 0.015]−0.056 [−0.11, 0.006]−1.73[−2.92, −0.30]−0.53 [−4.36, 1.59]
I20.817 [0.04, 2.44]0.72 [0.038, 2.66]0.016 [0.0082, 0.04]0.49 [0.025, 2.26]0.86 [0.041, 4.55]
TC (mg/dl)HDL-C (mg/dl)TG (mg/dl)VO2 max (ml/kg/min)
AET versus
RT−3.82 [−15.49, 6.66]1.44 [−0.60, 3.38]−10.8 [−30.22, 8.12]2.67 [1.47, 3.97]
CT versus
AET10.72[−15.38, 36.84]0.86 [−1.64, 3.62]0.22 [−24.22, 28.98]−0.019 [−1.74, 1.28]
CT versus
RT6.88 [−20.43, 33.24]2.30 [−0.54, 5.29]−10.56 [−37.51, 20.39]2.66 [1.00, 3.99]
I25.87 [0.299, 23.88]0.78 [0.046, 3.26]9.79 [0.38, 36.97]0.519 [0.023, 2.24]

% credible intervals); I2: estimated between study heterogeneity standard deviation (95% credible intervals); Relative intervention effectiveness is expressed as posterior medians (95

AET, aerobic exercise training; BW, body weight; CT, combined training; FM, fat mass; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LBM, lean body mass; RT, resistance training; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacyglycerols; VO2 max, maximal oxygen uptake; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist to hip ratio;