PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Immunol Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 December 17.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3865894
NIHMSID: NIHMS520133

Working out mechanisms of controlled/physiologic inflammation in the GI tract

Abstract

The mucosal immune system is distinct from its systemic counterpart by virtue of its enormous antigenic exposure (commensal flora, food antigen, pathogens). Despite this, the mucosal immune system maintains a response defined as controlled or physiologic inflammation. This is regulated by many different mechanisms, among which there are physical, cellular and soluble factors. Our laboratory has focused on unique Tregs in the gut controlled by, in one instance, intestinal epithelial cells that serve as non-professional antigen-presenting cells. We believe that intestinal epithelial cells, expressing classical and non-classical MHC molecules, serve to activate Tregs and thus maintain controlled or physiologic inflammation. In this review, we describe regulatory cytokines and T cells that are one part of the emphasis of our laboratory.

Keywords: Mucosal immunity, Oral tolerance, Lamina propria lymphocytes, Tregs, Epithelium

Introduction

The intestinal immune system: major components

The GI tract is the main site of contact with the external environment and, as such, is constantly exposed to antigenic stimulation. Stimuli can be harmful, such as pathogens (bacteria, protozoa, fungi, viruses) and toxic substances, or beneficial to the host, such as food or commensal flora [1]. The mucosal immune system has a complex scheme of defenses involving a physical barrier in addition to innate and adaptive immune mechanisms to create a delicate balance between mounting protective responses against pathogens and tolerance to harmless antigens.

Epithelial cells lining the mucosal surface of the GI tract comprise a dynamic physical interface between the external luminal environment and the body’s interior. Epithelial integrity is crucial for the maintenance of a selective physical barrier. Its function is maintained by specific intercellular structures including tight junctions, adherens junctions and desmosomes. This cell monolayer creates a trans-epithelial resistance that is indicative of the integrity of the epithelium [2]. The cells that make up the mucosal barrier are a self-renewing system undergoing continuous replacement from pluripotent stem cells located at the base of the crypts. Daughter cells undergo terminal differentiation into the absorptive or secretory lineage. Epithelial cells actively participate as a frontline defense response to external stimuli by playing an integral role in both innate and adaptive mucosal immunity. Epithelial host defense functions include secretion of fluid, electrolytes and mucus (flushing noxious substances from the bowel lumen) as well as the production of chemokines, cytokines, growth factors and antimicrobial peptides. Epithelial cells are also able to process and present antigens to immune cells located in the lamina propria (LP) [3, 4].

The mucosal immune system samples antigens and is responsible for their clearance. Sampling of antigens from the lumen of the gut is accomplished through different routes. Antigens can be taken up, processed and presented by classical and non-classical MHC molecules on intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). Antigens can also pass in between the intestinal epithelial cells and either get absorbed into capillaries that drain into the portal vein en route to the liver or get captured in the LP by resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [58]. Antigens can also be sampled from the gut lumen via fluid-phase endocytosis by specialized microfold cells (M cells) that overlay Peyer’s patches (PPs) [9]. Antigens within the PPs are presented by APCs to naïve T cells, and these T cells traffic to the draining mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) where classical APC presentation can occur [10, 11]. In the distal small bowel, antigens can be sampled by intestinal dendritic cells (DCs), which express tight junction proteins and can insert their dendrites through the epithelium and directly sample antigens from the lumen [12]. Effector cells traffic to the LP via contact with chemokines and integrins. Chemokines such as CCL25 and CCL28 are produced by IECs (from the small and the large intestine, respectively) and regulate trafficking of specific T cell subsets that express CCR9 or CCR10 to the mucosa. The expression of the α4β7 integrin by activated lymphocytes correlates with the recruitment to its ligand, mucosal adressin cell molecule (MAdCAM-1), which is expressed on the surface of high endothelial venules in the intestinal tissue and focuses homing of effector cells to the PP and the LP [4, 13, 14].

An interesting feature distinguishing the systemic and mucosal immune systems is that the reaction to antigens is geared toward hyporesponsiveness of the mucosal immune system, which is responsible for tolerance to commensal flora and food antigens. Different components of the mucosal immune system are responsible for maintaining the tolerant state (mucosal homeostasis). First, regulatory mucosal lymphocytes including regulatory T cells, DCs and macrophages are abundant in the intestinal LP. One more feature contributing to hyporesponsiveness in the mucosal immune system is the impaired signal transduction through the T cell receptor/CD3 complex in LP lymphocytes (LPLs). LPLs, unlike peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), can proliferate in response to anti-CD2 stimulation but not to anti-CD3 [15]. Furthermore, upon stimulation (via CD2), LPLs display increased levels of apoptosis [16]. LP macrophages, in contrast to peripheral blood monocytes, do not support proliferation of either LPL or PBL [17]. LP-DC populations, expressing CD103, induce the de novo differentiation of naïve T cells into CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ T cells, via a TGF-β- and retinoic acid (RA)-dependent mechanism. The LP-DC expressing the surface markers CD11bloCD11clo (although expressing high levels of TLRs) fail to produce proinflammatory cytokines when challenged. DCs isolated from PP can induce gut-homing properties in T cells, B cells and Tregs via an RA-dependent mechanism and can drive IgA class switching [18]. IgA is secreted by LP-resident plasma cells into the lumen and plays a role in neutralizing antigens. IgA-B cell development is usually T cell dependent; however, studies on the intestine have shown that IgA-producing B cells can develop in a T cell-independent manner, as part of the innate immune system. TLR signaling via NF-κB elicits B cell-activating factor (BAFF) and proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) expression in DCs, monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes and epithelial cells, including IECs. In the presence of appropriate cytokines, BAFF and APRIL initiate IgA-B cell development [19, 20].

Some of the regulatory mechanisms employed in the intestine to promote the tolerogenic environment by innate immune cells, comprising mucosal DC, monocytes and IECs, include the preferential secretion of the inhibitory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-10, TGF-β and the expression of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). IDO mediates tryptophan depletion, an essential nutrient for T cell proliferation and survival [21].

In addition, the hyporesponsiveness to antigens by IECs is mediated by aberrant expression of toll-like receptors (TLR) and the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) family of proteins that recognize conserved viral and bacterial motifs—pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). TLR function can be regulated by the location of the TLRs and the differential expression of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD14 and others [22]. TLR5 is only expressed on the basolateral side of IECs, allowing for the recognition of bacterial flagellins that are able to cross the barrier [23].

Immune regulation

One of the key components in regulating mucosal immune responses is the inhibitory pathways that are in place in the gut. These are divided into two groups: cytokines and regulatory cells.

Regulatory cytokines

Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)

TGF-β is a highly pleiotropic cytokine mediating several physiological processes including morphogenesis, embryonic development, adult stem cell differentiation, immune regulation, wound healing and inflammation. The human TGF-β family includes six isoforms: TGF-β, BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins), GDFs (growth and differentiation factors), MIF (Müllerian inhibitory factor), activins or inhibins. This family of proteins is expressed in distinct temporal and tissue-specific patterns. Interestingly, all immune cell lineages (including B cells, T cells, DCs and macrophages) secrete TGF-β. While the production of TGF-β is well programmed, the TGF-β receptor complex is widely expressed on hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells. The TGF-β receptor complex is composed of two serine/threonine kinase receptor subunits, TGF-β receptor 1 and TGF-β receptor 2 (TGF-βR1 and TGF-βR2, respectively), which form a heteromeric complex in the presence of the dimerized ligand [24, 25].

TGF-β is synthesized as part of a large precursor molecule containing a propeptide in addition to TGF-β. TGF-β is cleaved from a large precursor before its secretion from the cell but remains attached to the propeptide. Once secreted, the propeptide is stored in the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and integrins. The attachment of TGF-β to its binding protein (latency-associated protein—LAP) prevents it from binding to its receptor. The bioavailability of TGF-β depends on proteolytic processing that releases the cytokine. A number of mechanisms have been described for mediating this activation: high heat, pH, chaotropic agents, proteases, integrins and thrombospondin 1. Only integrin αvβ6 and thrombospondin 1 have been implicated by both in vivo and in vitro experiments [26, 27].

Upon TGF-β binding to the receptor complex, a series of phosphorylation events occur leading to phosphorylation of two intracellular proteins, SMAD2 and SMAD3. Once phosphorylated SMAD2 and SMAD3 associate with SMAD4 and translocate into the nucleus to induce transcription of target genes. Targeted disruption of SMAD3 is associated with diminished responsiveness to TGF-β [28]. SMAD6 and SMAD7 are negative regulators of this signaling pathway. They can bind to TGFβR1 and block its ability to activate SMAD2 and SMAD3. SMAD7 has been shown to be upregulated in tissue and peripheral blood from IBD patients [29].

There has been a substantial amount of literature describing the role of TGF-β in numerous and sometimes contradictory biological processes. Alterations of the TGF-β signaling pathway may lead to a wide range of pathologic conditions. Defects in the TGF-β signaling pathway have been associated with multiple cardiovascular abnormalities by influencing vascular cell proliferation, angiogenesis, etc. High TGF-β levels have also been associated with several bone and muscle diseases, as well as with pulmonary diseases such as broncho-pulmonary dysplasia, emphysema and asthma [30]. The role of TGF-β in cancer is still unclear. Defective TGF-β signaling is reported in human cancer and is associated with a worse prognosis. However, TGF-β is also a known tumor promotor. This dual role of TGF-β happens as a result of a combination of genetic or epigenetic perturbations in tumor cells, along with an alteration in the tumor microenvironment [31].

The expression of TGF-β mRNA and the production of TGF-β are associated with a number of pro-fibrogenic pathologies, including pulmonary fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, fibrotic kidney disease, alcohol-induced and autoimmune hepatic fibrosis, systemic sclerosis and CD. Tissue damage often occurs during pathological immune responses as a result of inflammation. First neutrophils enter the wounded sites to remove pathogens and damaged tissue via phagocytosis. Macrophages continue this process and also secrete growth factors including TGF-β, which help the fibrotic process. The fibrotic reaction is characterized by an increased production of ECM components such as fibronectin, collagen as well as proliferation, migration and accumulation of mesenchymal cells. This leads to activation of fibroblasts and their differentiation into myofibroblasts. TGF-β induces connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) production. Moreover, CTGF binds to TGF-β and enhances its binding to its receptor [26, 30, 32].

TGF-β has multiple effects on the immune system. Since high levels of TGF-β are found in the intestine, it likely plays a significant role in mucosal immune homeostasis. TGF-β is a known immunosuppressive cytokine, yet it is also able to induce immune responses. TGF-β has an overall suppressive affect on B cells by inhibiting mature B cell proliferation. Mature splenic B cells from a TGFβR2 conditional B cell of KO mice have shown an inhibition in B cell proliferation. Moreover, TGF-β induces apoptosis in immature and resting B cells through decreased expression of c-myc and NF-kB. Upon specific Ag stimulation, B cells can secrete TGF-β, which may be playing an autocrine role in inducing antibody production. TGF-β plays a role in T cell-dependent and T cell-independent IgA class switch in combination with CD40 ligand or BAFF and APRIL, respectively [3335]. TGF-β attenuates isotype switching to IgG1 and IgE through the inhibition of signals induced by IL4 via enhancing SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression. Secretory IgA is crucial for the prevention of recognition of microbial flora by the host. TGF-β function in IgA class switching is associated with an increased transcription of germline α transcripts. Mice with a blockade of TGF-β signaling in B cells have almost no serum IgA [34, 36]. Other APCs, such as macrophages and DCs, are also affected by TGF-β in different ways. TGF-β is crucial in the development of Langerhans cells (skin resident DCs). Mice lacking TGF-β do not have Langerhans cells [37]. TGF-β inhibits the maturation of DCs by inhibiting MHC class II expression. DCs also produce TGF-β, which plays an autocrine role in the maintenance of the immature state of DCs as well as promotes T cell differentiation. TGF-β has conflicting roles in monocytes, since it stimulates cells in the resting state (monocytes), whereas it inhibits activated macrophages.

TGF-β exerts the greatest impact on T lymphocytes. TGF-β can inhibit T cell proliferation by inhibiting IL-2 transcription as well as by upregulating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and downregulating c-myc. TGF-β is an important regulator of CD4+ TH differentiation. It inhibits TH1 and TH2 differentiation by reducing T-bet and GATA3 expression, respectively. TGF-β induces the differentiation of two very different subsets of CD4+ T cells. TGF-β contributes to immune suppression through the induction and maintenance of FoxP3 expressing CD4+ Treg cells (among other mechanisms). Nevertheless, TGF-β also has a pro-inflammatory effect through the differentiation of TH17 cells by inducing retinoic acid receptor–related orphan nuclear receptor γt TGF-β, in the presence or absence of IL-1β, and IL-6 induces the development of TH17 and Treg, respectively [38]. TGF-β plays a role in inhibiting CD8+ T cell differentiation and cytolytic activity. It inhibits perforin and FAS ligand expression.

The role that TGF-β plays in the mucosal immune system is still controversial. Animals with a homozygous mutation of TGF-β1 have no gross developmental abnormalities, but within a few weeks after birth, they exhibit wasting disease, multi-organ inflammation and tissue necrosis (including the intestine) resulting in organ failure and death [39, 40]. Moreover, a specific abrogation of TGF-β signaling in CD4+ T cells (TGFβR2-dn transgenic mice) leads to inflammation in the colon and the lungs [41]. To support the important role of the TGF-β signaling pathway in controlling autoimmunity and intestinal inflammation, a genetic disruption of SMAD3 has been shown to exhibit abnormal immune functions leading to inflammation in multiple organs including the intestine [28]. Human biopsies from normal controls treated with anti-TGF-β show an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-17. Interestingly, colonic biopsies from IBD patients display increased levels of TGF-β [42, 43].

Interleukin-10 (IL-10)

IL-10 is a homodimeric, pleiotropic cytokine with an immunoregulatory function whose actions influence many cell types in the mucosal immune system. It is a cytokine with potent anti-inflammatory properties, produced by both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells. IL-10 can suppress the activity of responder cells (T cells and APCs) or activates immunity as in IgA secretion by B cells. Most hematopoietic cells, lymphocytes and myeloid cells express the IL-10 receptor complex. Upon IL-10 binding to its receptor, Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) are phosphorylated and lead to activation of STAT3. The STAT3 signaling pathway increases the transcription of anti-apoptotic and cell cycle progression genes [44]. Interestingly, IL-10R has been found to be a susceptibility locus for IBD [45]. This finding correlates with the phenotype of the IL-10 or IL-10R2 KO mice models. Both KO mice develop colitis-like inflammation only when maintained in conventional animal facilities [46, 47]. This inflammation is a direct response to bacterial stimuli and is mediated by CD4+ T cells [48, 49]. IL-10 KO mice reared under specific-pathogen-free conditions do not develop intestinal inflammation. Infection of these mice with Helicobacter hepaticus induces chronic colitis [50]. Different studies have shown that the addition of IL-10 leads to the recovery from specific infections, like Leishmania, and prevention of autoimmunity, such as autoimmune gastritis, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis [5153].

STAT3 is a central player in mediating signaling from the IL-10 receptor complex. STAT3 KO mice die during early embryogenesis [54]; therefore, conditional STAT3 KO in different cell compartments are used. A myeloid-specific STAT3 ablation has led to the induction of macrophage activation and result in similar pathology to the one observed in IL-10 KO mice [55], while the loss of STAT3 in CD4+ T cells has been observed to prevent the development of inflammation [56].

Since the presence of IL-10 is crucial for mucosal immune homeostasis, potential therapies involving IL-10 have been tested. Injection of recombinant IL-10 into RAG mice prior to transfer with naïve CD4+ T cells has abrogated colitis, while transferring naïve CD4+ T cells from IL-10 transgenic mice has not led to colitis induction [57, 58]. Moreover, a genetically engineered IL-10 secreting L. lactis has been shown to cure colitis in IL-10 KO mice [59], while IL-10 induction by polysaccharide A (product of an intestinal commensal) has been shown to prevent colitis [60]. However, human phase 3 trials using recombinant IL-10 in IBD have not been successful due to lack of efficacy. This indicates that increasing the levels of IL-10 is not sufficient to cure IBD [61]. In fact, IL-10 is increased in tissues from IBD specimens.

Regulatory/suppressor T cells

For years, immunologists have known that the immune system requires regulatory components that dampen immune responses after a pathogen has been cleared [62]. These include regulatory T cells, macrophages, DCs, B cells and stromal cells. In 1970, Gershon and Kondo first introduced the concept of T cells suppressing immune responses in a paper describing CD8+ suppressor T cells (Ts) [63]. The study of CD8+ Ts cells triggered great interest during the 1970s and 1980s, yet no surface or other markers were found to uniquely distinguish CD8+ Ts from cytolytic CD8+ T cells, and this area of research was largely neglected. In 1988, Sakaguchi et al. showed that autoimmunity developed in nu/nu mice after engraftment of a thymus from euthymic nu/+ mice treated with cyclosporin A (CsA) [64]. This could be prevented by co-administration of thymocytes prepared from normal nu/+ mice. The cells promoting this regulatory effect were later described as the CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T cells [65]. Today, regulatory T cells have been shown to regulate immune responses, and several distinct regulatory T cell subsets have been described.

CD4+ regulatory T cells

The most studied population is the CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cell, which exists as a naturally occurring Treg (nTreg) or induced (antigen activated) Treg (iTreg). nTregs develop in the thymus through their ability to recognize self and foreign antigens. They play a role in maintaining self-tolerance and preventing immune pathology following chronic inflammation [66]. iTregs differentiate from naïve CD4+ T cells in response to tolerogenic processes in peripheral tissues. This differentiation is TGF-β dependent. These cells upregulate FoxP3, CD25 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) [67, 68]. CD25 is not a specific marker for Treg cells because it is also expressed by all activated T cells. In 2003, the FoxP3 transcription factor was identified as both a marker and a lineage commitment factor for CD4+ CD25+ Tregs [6971]. Patients with mutations affecting the FoxP3 gene develop immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy and enteropathy in an X-linked syndrome called IPEX. IPEX is a fatal autoimmune disorder, which develops early in life and affects multiple organs including the small intestine [72, 73]. Mice with a mutation in FoxP3 also develop fatal multi-organ inflammation similar to that found in IPEX patients [74]. In human, the expression of FoxP3 is not restricted to regulatory T cells, while in mice all of the evidence supports its role in a commitment toward a regulatory lineage [75]. nTreg protect from the induction of experimental colitis by CD4+ CD45RBhigh expressing cells (transferred into SCID mice). Interestingly, intestinal inflammation is not generally associated with a decrease in Tregs (with the exception of IPEX patients) [7678]. Moreover, Tregs have also been shown to be up-regulated in the mucosa of both UC and CD patients and to have intact suppressor activity (suppressing the proliferation of effector CD4+ CD25 T cells) [79, 80]. Thus far, of all of the CD4+ Tregs shown to have regulatory function in vitro, there is little evidence that their deficiency is involved in the development of IBD. This can be due to the fact that these cells have a redundant function in regulating the immune system in the gut or alternatively that there may be other cell subsets that play a major role in regulating the mucosal immune system. It is important to note that IL2R KO mice (CD25 KO mice) have inflammation only in the colon, suggesting that other types of regulatory T cells are responsible for maintaining homeostasis in the small bowel. Scurfy mice that lack FoxP3 have only small bowel inflammation (if they are inflamed at all) [62].

Both nTregs and iTregs have been shown to suppress proliferation of T cells. It is not clear whether FoxP3+ nTregs differ in phenotype or function from iTregs. When analyzing the mechanisms by which these subsets regulate immune responses, it is clear that both can specifically recognize a wide variety of antigens (auto-antigens in the case of nTregs). In fact, there is a requirement for Tregs to be activated, possibly by antigen stimulation via TcR, to exert Treg suppressive function in vitro. After activation by a specific antigen, Tregs mediate antigen-nonspecific suppression on the activation and expansion of other T cells [65, 81]. Survival of Tregs in the periphery is TGF-β and retinoic acid (RA) dependent [67, 82, 83]. Tregs have been demonstrated to suppress in a contact-dependent manner. Treg contact-dependent suppressor activity has been demonstrated in vitro and may involve signals from CTLA-4, glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) and membrane-bound TGF-β. Several groups have shown that membrane-bound TGF-β mediates this suppressor activity, while others have shown its dispensability. CTLA-4 expression has also been suggested by several groups to mediate suppression in nTregs and iTregs [84]. CTLA-4 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and encodes a protein that transmits an inhibitory signal to T cells. CTLA-4 binds to B7 molecules with a higher affinity than CD28 molecules, thereby inhibiting the positive co-stimulatory signals that activate T cells. In responder cells, CTLA-4 plays a role in ending immune responses initiated by the CD28 co-receptor. CTLA-4 downstream signaling in Tregs has been suggested to promote the suppressor activity of the cells. GITR is a member in the TNF receptor superfamily and plays a role in T cell homeostasis. A major role of glucocorticoid hormones is both to induce apoptosis and to protect the cell from undergoing apoptosis under different stimuli. GITR expression appears to be dependent on the activation through the CD3 complex. Binding of GITR ligand to GITR abrogates the suppressive activity of Treg cells and therefore can be used as a marker to identify the FoxP3+ Treg cell [85, 86].

CD4+ CD25+ T cells do not produce IL-10, but there are some studies suggesting that IL-10 does play a role in their mechanism of suppression [80, 8789]. Transferring CD4+ CD45Rbhigh cells into SCID mice induces colitis that can be abrogated by co-transfer of CD4+ CD45Rblow cells. Interestingly, administration of anti-IL-10-receptor antibodies completely abrogates the ability of CD4+ CD45Rblow cells to protect. In addition, transferring CD4+ CD45Rblow cells from IL-10-deficient mice were not able to protect the mice from colitis induction [90]. Furthermore, IL-10 administration benefits animals with colitis induced by CD4+ CD45Rbhigh cells [57]. CD4+ CD103+ T cell is another CD4+ Treg cell subset (can either be CD25+ or CD25) that expresses CTLA-4 and plays a role in preventing the development of IBD in mice. The molecule potentially involved in the suppression is CD101. It is expressed on 25–30 % of CD4+ CD25+ cells, and these cells have been shown to have a regulatory function in vitro, as well as in vivo (in a graft-vs-host disease model) [91]. Lack of expression of CD127 (the receptor for IL-7) is also seen in CD4+ CD25+ Tregs [13].

Tr1 cells do secrete IL-10 and are dependent on IL-10 but do not express FoxP3 and have low levels of CD25. Tr1 cells can proliferate in the presence of IL-2 and IL-15. The absence of Tr1 cells in IL-10-deficient mice is associated with the development of colitis, although there is no evidence that Tr1 cells play a direct role in the prevention of colitis in mice. Even though IL-10 KO mice have been shown to develop intestinal inflammation in the presence of commensal flora, the use of IL-10 as a treatment for human IBD has not proven efficacious.

TH3 cells were first identified to be present after oral tolerance induction [92]. TH3 express FoxP3 but not high levels of CD25. These cells produce TGF-β and respond to TGF-β. TH3 suppress the activity of TH1 and TH2 cells. TH3 are thought to promote the differentiation of nTreg and iTregs [93]. However, there is no evidence to correlate defects in TH3 cells and IBD [62, 94].

We have recently identified a novel population of CD4+ FoxP3/IL17 double-positive cells in the lamina propria of CD but not UC or normal patients. These cells share phenotypic characteristics of Th17 cells with secretion of IL17, IL22 and IL21 while expressing high levels of CCR6, CD161 and RORγt. However, unlike conventional Th17 cells and similar to FoxP3+ Tregs, they express high levels of CD101 and low levels of CD127, exhibit a similar TcR repertoire (Vβ usage) and are functionally suppressive in in vitro co-culture systems. FoxP3+ IL-17-producing cells are imprinted for gut homing, as indicated by high levels of CCR6, CD103 and the integrin α4β7 expression. These cells secrete IFNg but not IL10 or TGF-β. Thus, they represent a novel cell population that could provide useful insights into lineage commitment of Tregs versus Th17 cells. We propose that these cells sit at the crossroads between Treg and Th17 cells and that further commitment to either lineage results from microenvironmental cues present in the tissues. In an effort to define the microenvironmental cues present in the tissue that would give rise to these cells, we identified that UC LPL, but not normal or inflamed LPLs, in the presence of TGF-β gives rise to double-positive cells [95].

CD8+ T suppressor cells

The study of CD8+ T suppressor (Ts) cells is an evolving field of research, and the literature is somewhat puzzling and overlapping. It is still unclear how many distinct subsets there are and whether different groups have identified the same cell subsets utilizing different markers. Similar to CD4+ Tregs, CD8+ Ts cells can develop in the thymus (natural CD8+ Ts cells) or arise in the periphery upon stimulation. A number of subsets of naturally occurring CD8+ Ts cells have been described in humans and mice. Natural CD8+ Ts subsets have the ability to mediate suppression in an antigen non-restricted fashion. Human thymic CD8+ CD25+ Ts cell subsets share phenotypic similarities with CD4+ Treg. They express FoxP3, CTLA-4 and GITR. These cells mediate contact-dependent suppression, which can be blocked by anti-TGF-β- and anti-CTLA-4-neutralizing antibodies. CD8+ CD25+ Ts cells have also been shown to downregulate CD25 in responder cells [96]. Another subset is the CD8+ CD122+ Ts cell identified in mice and shown to mediate suppression via IL-10 production [97]. CD122-deficient mice spontaneously develop an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), which can be prevented by adoptive transfer of CD8+ CD122+ Ts cells, but not CD4+ Tregs [98, 99]. Moreover, CD8+ CD122+ were able not only to prevent the development of EAE but also to mediate a recovery after the onset of the disease [100], by recognition of activated T cells through conventional MHC class I and αβ TCR [101]. CD8+ CD122+ Ts cells have also been shown to play a role in regulating Graves’ hyperthyroidism [102]. A microarray analysis of murine CD8+ CD122+ has revealed a high level of expression of CXCR3. Human and murine CD8+ CXCR3+ cells have been shown to have suppressor function in vitro and to secrete IL-10 similar to murine CD8+ CD122+ cells [103]. It is important to mention that CD8+ Ts cells can recognize self-peptides restricted by Qa-1 in mice (HLA-E in humans) and attenuate EAE and MS [104108]. The mechanism of action utilized by these cells has been described as a direct killing of immune cells [109]. The interaction between the responder and the regulatory cells is mediated by the NKG2A receptor, and disruption of this interaction abolishes the ability of CD8+ Ts to protect from EAE development [110].

Multiple groups have shown that CD8+ Ts can be induced in the periphery. These can be separated into the ones that are activated in a specific cytokine milieu and the ones that are activated by TCR stimulation. Activation of CD8+ Ts cells has been shown to be IL-2 and GM-CSF dependent and found to be defective in multiple sclerosis patients. Moreover, the activated cells were not able to mediate suppression in the presence of anti-IFN-γ antibodies [111]. Another group has shown that CD8+ Ts cells can be induced with IL-2 and GM-CSF from healthy subjects but not from systemic erythematosus (SLE) patients, underscoring the roles of IL-2 and GM-CSF. In this instance, the suppressive activity has been blocked by either anti-IFN-γ antibodies or anti-sense oligonucleotides targeting IL-6 [112, 113]. Defects in CD8+ Ts cell induction have been shown in several autoimmune diseases, including MS, SLE and systemic sclerosis, and in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection or HIV infection [112, 114, 115].

A mixed lymphocyte reaction stimulating the induction of CD8+ Ts cells has been reported in multiple studies for over 20 years. A population of CD8+ CD28 Ts cells has been induced by xenoreactive or allogeneic stimulation. These cells induce anergy in responder CD4+ T cells [110, 116118]. Multiple groups have described a population of CD8+ CD103+ T cells. Allostimulation, viral peptides or TGF-β treatment have been shown to induce CD8+ CD103+ T cells. After the induction by viral peptides, these cells have been found to co-express FoxP3, GITR and CTLA-4, and the suppression is contact dependent [119121]. Another cell population resembling CD4+ Tregs is the CD8+ CD25+ FoxP3 Ts-expressing cells. The cells are induced through incubation with different types of APCs and can also upregulate CTLA-4 expression, which is involved in mediating contact-dependent suppression [122, 123]. LAG3 and CCL4 have also been shown to be upregulated in CD8+ CD25+ FoxP3 Ts-expressing cells after activation [124]. A modified anti-CD3 antibody has been shown to induce CD8+ Ts cells [125, 126].

Several IBD animal models have demonstrated that CD8+ Ts cells have an in vivo suppressor activity and are able to prevent the development of colitis by naïve CD4+ T cells. These cells were not able to protect from colitis induction in this model when isolated from IL-10-deficient mice or when co-transferred with naïve CD4+ T cells that are defective in their ability to respond to TGF-β [127, 128]. In a mouse model of Crohn’s disease, which features overexpression of tumor necrosis factor (TNFΔARE mice), CD8+ Tregs expressing CD44CD103+ secrete TGF-β. CD8+ CD44CD103+ T cells isolated from WT or TNFARE mice reconstitute the CD8+ compartment of RAG−/− mice and attenuate the ileitis induced by adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells from TNFΔARE mice [128]. Another CD11c+ - and CD103+ CD8+ -expressing Ts cell population, isolated from the epithelium of the small intestine, is able to protect against the induction of colitis by naïve CD4+ T cells. Interestingly, the same cell population isolated from the colon has not been shown to protect the mice from induction of chronic inflammation [129]. Recent work has shown that TGF-β and RA can induce a CD8+ Ts cell population expressing FoxP3 and CTLA-4 with regulatory function. This cell population is reduced in UC patients when compared to normal controls [130].

IEC-activated CD8+ Ts cells

Our laboratory has previously shown that IECs can stimulate a specific subset of CD8+ T cells. This was first demonstrated using an in vitro IEC/T cell co-culture, showing that only a small fraction of PB T cells could be expanded48. IECs express several antigen-presenting molecules, including classical class I and II molecules, non-classical class I molecules (CD1d, human leukocyte antigen E, MICA/B, FcRn) and co-stimulatory molecules (gp180, B7 h or B7H1) [131133]. In vitro co-culture studies have shown that the presence of a CD1d/gp180 complex (a non-classical MHC class I molecule and a co-stimulatory molecule, respectively) is crucial for the expansion of CD8+ Ts cells. We have also shown that IECs isolated from IBD patients have a defect in inducing the expansion of this regulatory T cell population, likely a result of the absence of the CD1d/gp180 complex on the surface of IECs. The expanded CD8+ Ts cell populations have been shown to express CD101 and CD103 but not CD28 and to mediate suppression via cell-to-cell contact [134].

CD1d most likely presents glycolipid molecules that are generated from the cell walls of bacteria or host cells. The combination of a CD1d/gp180 complex with a glycolipid antigen might stimulate a unique LPL population. This concept is furthered by the observation that there is a clonal expansion of CD8+ VB5.1 T cells in the mucosa compared to peripheral blood. This unique expansion is thought to be a direct result of antigen presentation by IECs. Blocking CD1d and/or gp180 inhibits the expansion of Ts cells. Since LPLs from IBD patients promote inflammation, and IECs from IBD patients do not express the CD1d/gp180 complex, we propose that IBD LPLs lack CD8+ Ts cells in their gut. The absence of this population may allow for an unchecked inflammatory response against luminal flora [134].

Conclusion

Controlled/physiologic inflammation is mediated in the intestine by several mechanisms. Different antigens elicit distinct types of immune responses. It is imperative that the mucosal immune system can distinguish between benign versus pathologic insults. Tregs (CD4 and CD8) have the capacity to modify the immune response in the intestine, and defects in any of these cells can lead to disease. Failure to generate these cells can lead to mucosal pathology such as IBD.

Biography

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms520133b1.gif

Lloyd Mayer

References

1. Vighi G, Marcucci F, Sensi L, Di Cara G, Frati F. Allergy and the gastrointestinal system. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;153(Suppl 1):3–6. [PubMed]
2. Bouhet S, Oswald IP. The effects of mycotoxins, fungal food contaminants, on the intestinal epithelial cell-derived innate immune response. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;108(1–2):199–209. [PubMed]
3. Blumberg RS. Current concepts in mucosal immunity. II. One size fits all: nonclassical MHC molecules fulfill multiple roles in epithelial cell function. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(2 Pt 1):G227–G231. [PubMed]
4. Zimmerman NP, Vongsa RA, Wendt MK, Dwinell MB. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in mucosal homeostasis at the intestinal epithelial barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(7):1000–1011. [PubMed]
5. Wyatt J, Oberhuber G, Pongratz S, Puspok A, Moser G, Novacek G, et al. Increased gastric and intestinal permeability in patients with crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(10):1891–1896. [PubMed]
6. McKay DM, Singh PK. Superantigen activation of immune cells evokes epithelial (T84) transport and barrier abnormalities via IFN-gamma and TNF alpha: Inhibition of increased permeability, but not diminished secretory responses by TGF-beta2. J Immunol. 1997;159(5):2382–2390. [PubMed]
7. Soderholm JD, Peterson KH, Olaison G, Franzen LE, Westrom B, Magnusson KE, et al. Epithelial permeability to proteins in the noninflamed ileum of crohn’s disease? Gastroenterology. 1999;117(1):65–72. [PubMed]
8. Kerr SW, Wolyniec WW, Filipovic Z, Nodop SG, Braza F, Winquist RJ, et al. Repeated measurement of intestinal permeability as an assessment of colitis severity in HLA-B27 transgenic rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291(2):903–910. [PubMed]
9. Jang MH, Kweon MN, Iwatani K, Yamamoto M, Terahara K, Sasakawa C, et al. Intestinal villous M cells: an antigen entry site in the mucosal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(16):6110–6115. [PubMed]
10. Gebert A, Steinmetz I, Fassbender S, Wendlandt KH. Antigen transport into peyer’s patches: increased uptake by constant numbers of M cells. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(1):65–72. [PubMed]
11. Fleeton MN, Contractor N, Leon F, Wetzel JD, Dermody TS, Kelsall BL. Peyer’s patch dendritic cells process viral antigen from apoptotic epithelial cells in the intestine of reovirus-infected mice. J Exp Med. 2004;200(2):235–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Niess JH, Brand S, Gu X, Landsman L, Jung S, McCormick BA, et al. CX3CR1-mediated dendritic cell access to the intestinal lumen and bacterial clearance. Science. 2005;307(5707):254–258. [PubMed]
13. Putnam AL, Brusko TM, Lee MR, Liu W, Szot GL, Ghosh T, et al. Expansion of human regulatory T-cells from patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58(3):652–662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Kuklin NA, Rott L, Darling J, Campbell JJ, Franco M, Feng N, et al. Alpha(4)beta(7) independent pathway for CD8(+) T cell-mediated intestinal immunity to rotavirus. J Clin Invest. 2000;106(12):1541–1552. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Meuer SC, Autschbach F, Schurmann G, Golling M, Braunstein J, Qiao L. Molecular mechanisms securing “unresponsiveness” in lamina propria T lymphocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;13(778):174–184. [PubMed]
16. Boirivant M, Pica R, DeMaria R, Testi R, Pallone F, Strober W. Stimulated human lamina propria T cells manifest enhanced fasmediated apoptosis. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(11):2616–2622. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Qiao L, Braunstein J, Golling M, Schurmann G, Autschbach F, Moller P, et al. Differential regulation of human T cell responsiveness by mucosal versus blood monocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1996;26(4):922–927. [PubMed]
18. Rescigno M, Lopatin U, Chieppa M. Interactions among dendritic cells, macrophages, and epithelial cells in the gut: Implications for immune tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20(6):669–675. [PubMed]
19. Macpherson AJ, Slack E. The functional interactions of commensal bacteria with intestinal secretory IgA. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23(6):673–678. [PubMed]
20. Cerutti A, Chen K, Chorny A. Immunoglobulin responses at the mucosal interface. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;23(29):273–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Arnett HA, Viney JL. Gatekeepers of intestinal inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2010;59(1):1–14. [PubMed]
22. Fearns C, Kravchenko VV, Ulevitch RJ, Loskutoff DJ. Murine CD14 gene expression in vivo: Extramyeloid synthesis and regulation by lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med. 1995;181(3):857–866. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Gewirtz AT, Navas TA, Lyons S, Godowski PJ, Madara JL. Cutting edge: bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression. J Immunol. 2001;167(4):1882–1885. [PubMed]
24. Moustakas A, Pardali K, Gaal A, Heldin CH. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth and differentiation. Immunol Lett. 2002;82(1–2):85–91. [PubMed]
25. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113(6):685–700. [PubMed]
26. Blobe GC, Schiemann WP, Lodish HF. Role of transforming growth factor beta in human disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1350–1358. [PubMed]
27. Annes JP, Chen Y, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Integrin alphaVbeta6-mediated activation of latent TGF-beta requires the latent TGF-beta binding protein-1. J Cell Biol. 2004;165(5):723–734. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Yang X, Letterio JJ, Lechleider RJ, Chen L, Hayman R, Gu H, et al. Targeted disruption of SMAD3 results in impaired mucosal immunity and diminished T cell responsiveness to TGF-beta. EMBO J. 1999;18(5):1280–1291. [PubMed]
29. Monteleone G, Boirivant M, Pallone F, MacDonald TT. TGF-beta1 and Smad7 in the regulation of IBD. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1(Suppl 1):S50–S53. [PubMed]
30. Santibanez JF, Quintanilla M, Bernabeu C. TGF-beta/TGF-beta receptor system and its role in physiological and pathological conditions. Clin Sci (Lond) 2011;121(6):233–251. [PubMed]
31. Yang L, Pang Y, Moses HL. TGF-beta and immune cells: an important regulatory axis in the tumor microenvironment and progression. Trends Immunol. 2010;31(6):220–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Li MO, Wan YY, Sanjabi S, Robertson AK, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta regulation of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:99–146. [PubMed]
33. Islam KB, Nilsson L, Sideras P, Hammarstrom L, Smith CI. TGF-beta 1 induces germ-line transcripts of both IgA subclasses in human B lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1991;3(11):1099–1106. [PubMed]
34. Cazac BB, Roes J. TGF-beta receptor controls B cell responsiveness and induction of IgA in vivo. Immunity. 2000;13(4):443–451. [PubMed]
35. Kaminski DA, Stavnezer J. Enhanced IgA class switching in marginal zone and B1 B cells relative to follicular/B2 B cells. J Immunol. 2006;177(9):6025–6029. [PubMed]
36. Li MO, Sanjabi S, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta controls development, homeostasis, and tolerance of T cells by regulatory T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Immunity. 2006;25(3):455–471. [PubMed]
37. Borkowski TA, Letterio JJ, Farr AG, Udey MC. A role for endogenous transforming growth factor beta 1 in langerhans cell biology: the skin of transforming growth factor beta 1 null mice is devoid of epidermal langerhans cells. J Exp Med. 1996;184(6):2417–2422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Hong S, Lee HJ, Kim SJ, Hahm KB. Connection between inflammation and carcinogenesis in gastrointestinal tract: Focus on TGF-beta signaling. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(17):2080–2093. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Shull MM, Ormsby I, Kier AB, Pawlowski S, Diebold RJ, Yin M, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature. 1992;359(6397):693–699. [PubMed]
40. Kulkarni AB, Ward JM, Yaswen L, Mackall CL, Bauer SR, Huh CG, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 null mice. an animal model for inflammatory disorders. Am J Pathol. 1995;146(1):264–275. [PubMed]
41. Gorelik L, Flavell RA. Abrogation of TGFbeta signaling in T cells leads to spontaneous T cell differentiation and autoimmune disease. Immunity. 2000;12(2):171–181. [PubMed]
42. Di Sabatino A, Pickard KM, Rampton D, Kruidenier L, Rovedatti L, Leakey NA, et al. Blockade of transforming growth factor beta upregulates T-box transcription factor T-bet, and increases T helper cell type 1 cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase-3 production in the human gut mucosa. Gut. 2008;57(5):605–612. [PubMed]
43. Babyatsky MW, Rossiter G, Podolsky DK. Expression of transforming growth factors alpha and beta in colonic mucosa in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1996;110(4):975–984. [PubMed]
44. Donnelly RP, Dickensheets H, Finbloom DS. The interleukin-10 signal transduction pathway and regulation of gene expression in mononuclear phagocytes. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1999;19(6):563–573. [PubMed]
45. Glocker EO, Kotlarz D, Boztug K, Gertz EM, Schaffer AA, Noyan F, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease and mutations affecting the interleukin-10 receptor. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(21):2033–2045. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Kuhn R, Lohler J, Rennick D, Rajewsky K, Muller W. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell. 1993;75(2):263–274. [PubMed]
47. Spencer SD, Di Marco F, Hooley J, Pitts-Meek S, Bauer M, Ryan AM, et al. The orphan receptor CRF2–4 is an essential subunit of the interleukin 10 receptor. J Exp Med. 1998;187(4):571–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Davidson NJ, Leach MW, Fort MM, Thompson-Snipes L, Kuhn R, Muller W, et al. T helper cell 1-type CD4+ T cells, but not B cells, mediate colitis in interleukin 10-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1996;184(1):241–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Asseman C, Read S, Powrie F. Colitogenic Th1 cells are present in the antigen-experienced T cell pool in normal mice: control by CD4+ regulatory T cells and IL-10. J Immunol. 2003;171(2):971–978. [PubMed]
50. Kullberg MC, Ward JM, Gorelick PL, Caspar P, Hieny S, Cheever A, et al. Helicobacter hepaticus triggers colitis in specific-pathogen-free interleukin-10 (IL-10)-deficient mice through an IL-12- and gamma interferon-dependent mechanism. Infect Immunol. 1998;66(11):5157–5166. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Liu H, Hu B, Xu D, Liew FY. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells cure murine colitis: the role of IL-10, TGF-beta, and CTLA4. J Immunol. 2003;171(10):5012–5017. [PubMed]
52. Suri-Payer E, Cantor H. Differential cytokine requirements for regulation of autoimmune gastritis and colitis byCD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. J Autoimmun. 2001;16(2):115–123. [PubMed]
53. O’Garra A, Barrat FJ, Castro AG, Vicari A, Hawrylowicz C. Strategies for use of IL-10 or its antagonists in human disease. Immunol Rev. 2008;223:114–131. [PubMed]
54. Akira S. Functional roles of STAT family proteins: lessons from knockout mice. Stem Cells. 1999;17(3):138–146. [PubMed]
55. Takeda K, Clausen BE, Kaisho T, Tsujimura T, Terada N, Forster I, et al. Enhanced Th1 activity and development of chronic enterocolitis in mice devoid of Stat3 in macrophages and neutrophils. Immunity. 1999;10(1):39–49. [PubMed]
56. Liu X, Lee YS, Yu CR, Egwuagu CE. Loss of STAT3 in CD4 + T cells prevents development of experimental autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):6070–6076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Powrie F, Leach MW, Mauze S, Menon S, Caddle LB, Coffman RL. Inhibition of Th1 responses prevents inflammatory bowel disease in scid mice reconstituted with CD45RBhi CD4+ T cells. Immunity. 1994;1(7):553–562. [PubMed]
58. Hagenbaugh A, Sharma S, Dubinett SM, Wei SH, Aranda R, Cheroutre H, et al. Altered immune responses in interleukin 10 transgenic mice. J Exp Med. 1997;185(12):2101–2010. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, Falk W, et al. Treatment of murine colitis by lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science. 2000;289(5483):1352–1355. [PubMed]
60. Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature. 2008;453(7195):620–625. [PubMed]
61. Plevy SE, Targan SR. Future therapeutic approaches for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1838–1846. [PubMed]
62. Allez M, Mayer L. Regulatory T cells: peace keepers in the gut. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10(5):666–676. [PubMed]
63. Gershon RK, Kondo K. Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970;18(5):723–737. [PubMed]
64. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N. Thymus and autoimmunity trans-plantation of the thymus from cyclosporin A-treated mice causes organ-specific autoimmune disease in athymic nude mice. J Exp Med. 1988;167(4):1479–1485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Takahashi T, Kuniyasu Y, Toda M, Sakaguchi N, Itoh M, Iwata M, et al. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+ CD4+ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int Immunol. 1998;10(12):1969–1980. [PubMed]
66. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:531–562. [PubMed]
67. Chen W, Jin W, Hardegen N, Lei KJ, Li L, Marinos N, et al. Conversion of peripheral CD4 + CD25− naive T cells to CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-beta induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J Exp Med. 2003;198(12):1875–1886. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Park HB, Paik DJ, Jang E, Hong S, Youn J. Acquisition of anergic and suppressive activities in transforming growth factor-beta-costimulated CD4+ CD25- T cells. Int Immunol. 2004;16(8):1203–1213. [PubMed]
69. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(4):330–336. [PubMed]
70. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299(5609):1057–1061. [PubMed]
71. Khattri R, Cox T, Yasayko SA, Ramsdell F. An essential role for scurfin in CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(4):337–342. [PubMed]
72. Bennett CL, Christie J, Ramsdell F, Brunkow ME, Ferguson PJ, Whitesell L, et al. The immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is caused by mutations of FOXP3. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):20–21. [PubMed]
73. Gambineri E, Torgerson TR, Ochs HD. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, and X-linked inheritance (IPEX), a syndrome of systemic autoimmunity caused by mutations of FOXP3, a critical regulator of T-cell homeostasis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15(4):430–435. [PubMed]
74. Wildin RS, Ramsdell F, Peake J, Faravelli F, Casanova JL, Buist N, et al. X-linked neonatal diabetes mellitus, enteropathy and endocrinopathy syndrome is the human equivalent of mouse scurfy. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):18–20. [PubMed]
75. Allan SE, Alstad AN, Merindol N, Crellin NK, Amendola M, Bacchetta R, et al. Generation of potent and stable human CD4+ T regulatory cells by activation-independent expression of FOXP3. Mol Ther. 2008;16(1):194–202. [PubMed]
76. Maul J, Loddenkemper C, Mundt P, Berg E, Giese T, Stallmach A, et al. Peripheral and intestinal regulatory CD4+ CD25(high) T cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(7):1868–1878. [PubMed]
77. Uhlig HH, Coombes J, Mottet C, Izcue A, Thompson C, Fanger A, et al. Characterization of Foxp3+ CD4+ CD25+ and IL-10-secreting CD4+ CD25+ T cells during cure of colitis. J Immunol. 2006;177(9):5852–5860. [PubMed]
78. Tiittanen M, Westerholm-Ormio M, Verkasalo M, Savilahti E, Vaarala O. Infiltration of forkhead box P3-expressing cells in small intestinal mucosa in coeliac disease but not in type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;152(3):498–507. [PubMed]
79. Saruta M, Yu QT, Fleshner PR, Mantel PY, Schmidt-Weber CB, Banham AH, et al. Characterization of FOXP3+ CD4+regulatory T cells in crohn’s disease. Clin Immunol. 2007;125(3):281–290. [PubMed]
80. Yu QT, Saruta M, Avanesyan A, Fleshner PR, Banham AH, Papadakis KA. Expression and functional characterization of FOXP3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(2):191–199. [PubMed]
81. Thornton AM, Piccirillo CA, Shevach EM. Activation requirements for the induction of CD4+ CD25+ T cell suppressor function. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(2):366–376. [PubMed]
82. Coombes JL, Siddiqui KR, Arancibia-Carcamo CV, Hall J, Sun CM, Belkaid Y, et al. A functionally specialized population of mucosal CD103+ DCs induces Foxp3+ regulatory T cells via a TGF-beta and retinoic acid-dependent mechanism. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1757–1764. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Sun CM, Hall JA, Blank RB, Bouladoux N, Oukka M, Mora JR, et al. Small intestine lamina propria dendritic cells promote de novo generation of Foxp3 T reg cells via retinoic acid. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1775–1785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
84. Saurer L, Mueller C. T cell-mediated immunoregulation in the gastrointestinal tract. Allergy. 2009;64(4):505–519. [PubMed]
85. Ji HB, Liao G, Faubion WA, Abadia-Molina AC, Cozzo C, Laroux FS, et al. Cutting edge: The natural ligand for glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein abrogates regulatory T cell suppression. J Immunol. 2004;172(10):5823–5827. [PubMed]
86. Nocentini G, Riccardi C. GITR: A multifaceted regulator of immunity belonging to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35(4):1016–1022. [PubMed]
87. Oppenheim JJ, Feldmann M, Durum SK. Cytokine reference: a compendium of cytokines and other mediators of host defense. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.
88. Kapp JA, Honjo K, Kapp LM, Goldsmith K, Bucy RP. Antigen, in the presence of TGF-beta, induces up-regulation of FoxP3gfp+ in CD4+ TCR transgenic T cells that mediate linked suppression of CD8+ T cell responses. J Immunol. 2007;179(4):2105–2114. [PubMed]
89. Levings MK, Allan S, d’Hennezel E, Piccirillo CA. Functional dynamics of naturally occurring regulatory T cells in health and autoimmunity. Adv Immunol. 2006;92:119–155. [PubMed]
90. Asseman C, Mauze S, Leach MW, Coffman RL, Powrie F. An essential role for interleukin 10 in the function of regulatory T cells that inhibit intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med. 1999;190(7):995–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Fernandez I, Zeiser R, Karsunky H, Kambham N, Beilhack A, Soderstrom K, et al. CD101 surface expression discriminates potency among murine FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2007;179(5):2808–2814. [PubMed]
92. Chen Y, Kuchroo VK, Inobe J, Hafler DA, Weiner HL. Regulatory T cell clones induced by oral tolerance: suppression of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science. 1994;265(5176):1237–1240. [PubMed]
93. Faria AM, Weiner HL. Oral tolerance. Immunol Rev. 2005;206:232–259. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Dinesh RK, Skaggs BJ, La Cava A, Hahn BH, Singh RP. CD8+ tregs in lupus, autoimmunity, and beyond. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9(8):560–568. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Hovhannisyan Z, Treatman J, Littman DR, Mayer L. Characterization of interleukin-17-producing regulatory T cells in inflamed intestinal mucosa from patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(3):957–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
96. Cosmi L, Liotta F, Lazzeri E, Francalanci M, Angeli R, Mazzinghi B, et al. Human CD8+ CD25+ thymocytes share phenotypic and functional features with CD4+ CD25+ regulatory thymocytes. Blood. 2003;102(12):4107–4114. [PubMed]
97. Endharti AT, Rifa’I M, Shi Z, Fukuoka Y, Nakahara Y, Kawamoto Y, et al. Cutting edge: CD8+ CD122+ regulatory T cells produce IL-10 to suppress IFN-gamma production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175(11):7093–7097. [PubMed]
98. Suzuki H, Kundig TM, Furlonger C, Wakeham A, Timms E, Matsuyama T, et al. Deregulated T cell activation and autoimmunity in mice lacking interleukin-2 receptor beta. Science. 1995;268(5216):1472–1476. [PubMed]
99. Rifa’i M, Kawamoto Y, Nakashima I, Suzuki H. Essential roles of CD8+ CD122+ regulatory T cells in the maintenance of T cell homeostasis. J Exp Med. 2004;200(9):1123–1134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
100. Lee YH, Ishida Y, Rifa’i M, Shi Z, Isobe K, Suzuki H. Essential role of CD8+ CD122+ regulatory T cells in the recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2008;180(2):825–832. [PubMed]
101. Rifa’i M, Shi Z, Zhang SY, Lee YH, Shiku H, Isobe K, et al. CD8+ CD122+ regulatory T cells recognize activated T cells via conventional MHC class I-alphabetaTCR interaction and become IL-10-producing active regulatory cells. Int Immunol. 2008;20(7):937–947. [PubMed]
102. Saitoh O, Abiru N, Nakahara M, Nagayama Y. CD8+ CD122+ T cells, a newly identified regulatory T subset, negatively regulate graves’ hyperthyroidism in a murine model. Endocrinology. 2007;148(12):6040–6046. [PubMed]
103. Shi Z, Okuno Y, Rifa’i M, Endharti AT, Akane K, Isobe K, et al. Human CD8+ CXCR3+ T cells have the same function as murine CD8+ CD122+ treg. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(8):2106–2119. [PubMed]
104. Jiang H, Ware R, Stall A, Flaherty L, Chess L, Pernis B. Murine CD8+ T cells that specifically delete autologous CD4+ T cells expressing V beta 8 TCR: a role of the qa-1 molecule. Immunity. 1995;2(2):185–194. [PubMed]
105. Jiang H, Kashleva H, Xu LX, Forman J, Flaherty L, Pernis B, et al. T cell vaccination induces T cell receptor vbeta-specific qa-1-restricted regulatory CD8(+) T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(8):4533–4537. [PubMed]
106. Hu D, Ikizawa K, Lu L, Sanchirico ME, Shinohara ML, Cantor H. Analysis of regulatory CD8 T cells in qa-1-deficient mice. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(5):516–523. [PubMed]
107. Tennakoon DK, Mehta RS, Ortega SB, Bhoj V, Racke MK, Karandikar NJ. Therapeutic induction of regulatory, cytotoxicCD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 2006;176(11):7119–7129. [PubMed]
108. Correale J, Villa A. Isolation and characterization of CD8+ regulatory T cells in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;195(1–2):121–134. [PubMed]
109. Jiang H, Braunstein NS, Yu B, Winchester R, Chess L. CD8+ T cells control the TH phenotype of MBP-reactive CD4+ T cells in EAE mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(11):6301–6306. [PubMed]
110. Liu Z, Tugulea S, Cortesini R, Suciu-Foca N. Specific suppression of T helper alloreactivity by allo-MHC class I-restricted CD8+ CD28- T cells. Int Immunol. 1998;10(6):775–783. [PubMed]
111. Balashov KE, Khoury SJ, Hafler DA, Weiner HL. Inhibition of T cell responses by activated human CD8+ T cells is mediated by interferon-gamma and is defective in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(6):2711–2719. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Filaci G, Bacilieri S, Fravega M, Monetti M, Contini P, Ghio M, et al. Impairment of CD8+ T suppressor cell function in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166(10):6452–6457. [PubMed]
113. Filaci G, Fravega M, Negrini S, Procopio F, Fenoglio D, Rizzi M, et al. Nonantigen specific CD8+ T suppressor lymphocytes originate from CD8+ CD28- T cells and inhibit both T-cell proliferation and CTL function. Hum Immunol. 2004;65(2):142–156. [PubMed]
114. Filaci G, Rizzi M, Setti M, Fenoglio D, Fravega M, Basso M, et al. Non-antigen-specific CD8(+) T suppressor lymphocytes in diseases characterized by chronic immune responses and inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1050:115–123. [PubMed]
115. Filaci G, Fravega M, Fenoglio D, Rizzi M, Negrini S, Viggiani R, et al. Non-antigen specific CD8+ T suppressor lymphocytes. Clin Exp Med. 2004;4(2):86–92. [PubMed]
116. Jiang S, Tugulea S, Pennesi G, Liu Z, Mulder A, Lederman S, et al. Induction of MHC-class I restricted human suppressor T cells by peptide priming in vitro. Hum Immunol. 1998;59(11):690–699. [PubMed]
117. Ciubotariu R, Colovai AI, Pennesi G, Liu Z, Smith D, Berlocco P, et al. Specific suppression of human CD4+ th cell responses to pig MHC antigens by CD8+ CD28- regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 1998;161(10):5193–5202. [PubMed]
118. Colovai AI, Liu Z, Ciubotariu R, Lederman S, Cortesini R, Suciu-Foca N. Induction of xenoreactive CD4+ T-cell anergy by suppressor CD8+ CD28- T cells. Transplantation. 2000;69(7):1304–1310. [PubMed]
119. Uss E, Rowshani AT, Hooibrink B, Lardy NM, van Lier RA, ten Berge IJ. CD103 is a marker for alloantigen-induced regulatory CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2006;177(5):2775–2783. [PubMed]
120. Billerbeck E, Blum HE, Thimme R. Parallel expansion of human virus-specific FoxP3− effector memory and de novo-generated FoxP3+ regulatory CD8+ T cells upon antigen recognition in vitro. J Immunol. 2007;179(2):1039–1048. [PubMed]
121. Lu L, Yu Y, Li G, Pu L, Zhang F, Zheng S, et al. CD8(+)CD103(+) regulatory T cells in spontaneous tolerance of liver allografts. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9(5):546–548. [PubMed]
122. Jarvis LB, Matyszak MK, Duggleby RC, Goodall JC, Hall FC, Gaston JS. Autoreactive human peripheral blood CD8+ T cells with a regulatory phenotype and function. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35(10):2896–2908. [PubMed]
123. Mahic M, Henjum K, Yaqub S, Bjornbeth BA, Torgersen KM, Tasken K, et al. Generation of highly suppressive adaptive CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells by continuous antigen stimulation. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(3):640–646. [PubMed]
124. Joosten SA, van Meijgaarden KE, Savage ND, de Boer T, Triebel F, van der Wal A, et al. Identification of a human CD8+ regulatory T cell subset that mediates suppression through the chemokine CC chemokine ligand 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(19):8029–8034. [PubMed]
125. Bisikirska B, Colgan J, Luban J, Bluestone JA, Herold KC. TCR stimulation with modified anti-CD3 mAb expands CD8+ T cell population and induces CD8+ CD25+ tregs. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(10):2904–2913. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Ablamunits V, Herold KC. Generation and function of human regulatory CD8+ T cells induced by a humanized OKT3 monoclonal antibody hOKT3gamma1 (ala–ala) Hum Immunol. 2008;69(11):732–736. [PubMed]
127. Menager-Marcq I, Pomie C, Romagnoli P, van Meerwijk JP. CD8+ CD28- regulatory T lymphocytes prevent experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(6):1775–1885. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
128. Ho J, Kurtz CC, Naganuma M, Ernst PB, Cominelli F, Rivera-Nieves J. A CD8+/CD103high T cell subset regulates TNF-mediated chronic murine ileitis. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2573–2580. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
129. Fujiwara D, Chen L, Wei B, Braun J. Small intestine CD11c+ CD8+ T cells suppress CD4+ T cell-induced immune colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300(6):G939–G947. [PubMed]
130. Fleissner D, Frede A, Knott M, Knuschke T, Geffers R, Hansen W, et al. Generation and function of immunosuppressive human and murine CD8+ T cells by transforming growth factor-beta and retinoic acid. Immunology. 2011;134(1):82–92. [PubMed]
131. Campbell NA, Park MS, Toy LS, Yio XY, Devine L, Kavathas P, et al. A non-class I MHC intestinal epithelial surface glycoprotein, gp180, binds to CD8. Clin Immunol. 2002;102(3):267–274. [PubMed]
132. Allez M, Tieng V, Nakazawa A, Treton X, Pacault V, Dulphy N, et al. CD4+ NKG2D+ T cells in crohn’s disease mediate inflammatory and cytotoxic responses through MICA interactions. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2346–2358. [PubMed]
133. Nakazawa A, Dotan I, Brimnes J, Allez M, Shao L, Tsushima F, et al. The expression and function of costimulatory molecules B7H and B7–H1 on colonic epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(5):1347–1357. [PubMed]
134. Brimnes J, Allez M, Dotan I, Shao L, Nakazawa A, Mayer L. Defects in CD8+ regulatory T cells in the lamina propria of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol. 2005;174(9):5814–5822. [PubMed]