PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjBMJ helping doctors make better decisionsSearch bmj.comLatest content
 
BMJ. Apr 3, 2004; 328(7443): 823–826.
PMCID: PMC383384
Role of gender in health disparity: the South Asian context
Fariyal F Fikree, program associate1 and Omrana Pasha, manager, research projects2
1 International Program Division, Population Council, 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York 10017, USA
2 Women's and Children's Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Correspondence to: F F Fikree ffikree/at/popcouncil.org
Accepted March 11, 2004.
Short abstract
South Asia's girls and women do not have the same life advantage as their Western counterparts. A human rights based approach may help to overcome gender related barriers and improve the wellbeing of men, women, and children.
Introduction
Behaviour has an important role in health disparities—for example, young men take greater risks, causing injury and violent death, and men smoke more.1 In industrialised countries women are born with an advantage; their healthy life expectancy is two years longer and their life expectancy six years longer than those of men.2 This advantage is prominent in childhood; girls are more likely to survive the first five years of life than boys.2 However, does this female advantage endure in parts of the world where gender discrimination exists? We present the case of South Asia to illustrate the role that gender has on health.
From many perspectives women in South Asia find themselves in subordinate positions to men and are socially, culturally, and economically dependent on them.3 Women are largely excluded from making decisions, have limited access to and control over resources, are restricted in their mobility, and are often under threat of violence from male relatives.4 Sons are perceived to have economic, social, or religious utility; daughters are often felt to be an economic liability because of the dowry system.5
We believe that individual and societal beliefs about and attitudes towards appropriate gender specific roles, and the choices of individuals and households on the basis of these factors, mean that women are disadvantaged with regard to health and health care. There are some instances in which gender differences hurt men's health—for example, men are more likely to be involved in road crashes or occupational accidents as they are more likely to be outside the home or in a workplace than women. However, most of the evidence shows that gender inequalities have led to a systematic devaluing and neglect of women's health.
Summary points
The life advantage for girls and women that characterises the health statistics of industrialised countries is blurred in South Asia
Gender discrimination at each stage of the female life cycle contributes to health disparity, sex selective abortions, neglect of girl children, reproductive mortality, and poor access to health care for girls and women
The violation of fundamental human rights, and especially reproductive rights of women, plays an important part in perpetuating gender inequity
Policy makers, programme managers, health professionals, and human rights workers in South Asia need to be aware of and responsive to the detrimental health effects that gender plays throughout the life cycle
Established gender norms and values contribute to the loss of the “female advantage” in South Asia. In contrast to industrialised countries, healthy life expectancy is equal or shorter in women than in men in nearly all these countries. The probability of surviving the first five years of life for girls is equal to or smaller than that for boys (table). The single exception is Sri Lanka, which has indicators that reflect both improved overall health status of the population and a paucity of evidence of female disadvantage. India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan constitute almost 97% of the population in South Asia, and our comments will focus on these countries.
Table 1
Table 1
Life expectancy indicators for South Asian countries2
Gender related differences in health status have led to an unbalanced sex ratio for the past 100 years, which is declining further.6 An estimated 60-100 million girls are “missing” worldwide,7,8 and the imbalanced sex ratios of South Asian countries contribute a large proportion of this number.9,10 In some parts of the Indian subcontinent the sex ratio has fallen as low as 770 women per 1000 men.11 Gender discrimination at each stage of the female life cycle contributes to this imbalance. Sex selective abortions, neglect of girl children, reproductive mortality, and poor access to health care for girls and women have all been cited as reasons for this difference (figure).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Life cycle of gender discrimination and health
Sex selection
Since the advent of sex selection techniques before conception as well as in utero diagnosis and selective abortion of female fetuses, prenatal selection of male embryos has become common. One of the most disturbing aspects of this practice is that educated women who have frequent exposure to the media are the ones most likely to seek a sex selective abortion.12 The most extreme form of sex selection, female infanticide, has focused international media attention on certain communities in India.13,14 Reports from both the scientific literature and the local press show that this problem is likely to occur in various settings.15,16
Neglect of girls
Less notorious but more far reaching than infanticide is the so called benign neglect that girls are subject to at all ages in South Asia. This has led to gender based health disparities among the population aged under 5 years that are larger than anywhere else in the world.17 A girl between her first and fifth birthday in India or Pakistan has a 30-50% higher chance of dying than a boy.17 This neglect may take the form of poor nutrition,18-20 lack of preventive care (specifically immunisation),18,21 and delays in seeking health care for disease.22-24
Health of adolescents
Early marriage and pregnancy,25 anaemia,26 sexual violence,27 and poor educational opportunities all contribute to ill health among female adolescents in this region. Adolescents,28 especially young women,29 are disproportionately affected by HIV infection worldwide; adolescence is also a time when vulnerabilities to injury, including motor vehicle crashes and suicide, as well as substance abuse, rise.30 In most parts of the world men bear the greater burden of violence and injuries30; however, suicide among young women may be more common in South Asia than in other parts of the world.31-33 This, combined with the distressing practice of “dowry murder,”34 means that young South Asian women are at a particular risk from violence. The current demographic trend of a rapidly growing young population35 will increase the impact of adolescent health issues. Despite this, little attention has been paid to these conditions in the South Asian context of gender inequity.
The risks of reproduction
By their nature reproductive health hazards are borne by women alone. Poor outcomes for both mother and child are inevitable for a large proportion of the population as long as many South Asian mothers are too young,25 receive minimal antenatal care,36,37 and are malnourished36,38 or anaemic36,39,40 during pregnancy.
Poor vital registration systems in South Asia pose a challenge to measuring maternal mortality at the national level.41 Maternal deaths—most commonly from haemorrhage, sepsis, and eclampsia—continue to exact a high toll; unsafe abortions also contribute to deaths from haemorrhage and sepsis.36,38,41 Home deliveries by unskilled attendants, a paucity of knowledge of intrapartum danger signs, and poor transport mechanisms to and lack of appropriate care at health facilities all contribute to this burden.36,42 Women cite economic circumstances and spousal or familial opposition to delivery in hospital as the most common reasons for delivery at home. Decisions about seeking care in such emergencies are made largely by the husband or the elder members of his family.36,43,44
Health care for women
Women are less likely to seek appropriate and early care for disease. Yet the frequency with which such care is required—burden of disease, maternal mortality, and morbidity aside—and the quality of care provided to women has not been well documented in South Asia. In the authors' experience, diseases that generally have an equal prevalence in men and women are found to have affected women disproportionately in this region.45-47 It remains unclear why South Asian women are more often affected by diseases such as rheumatic heart disease and hepatitis C virus infection, but it is clearly a cause for grave concern.
As more women survive into old age, the role of gender differences among older adults will become more important. South Asian women experience greater ill health and a loss of activities of daily living as they age.48 They are also more vulnerable because they are likely to be illiterate, unemployed, widowed, and dependent on others.49 The combination of perceived ill health and lack of support mechanisms contributes to a poor quality of life, and public policy to address the concerns of this group of women will be needed as increasing numbers survive to old age.
Most gender based health differences in South Asia can be traced back to the same underlying factors: decreasing fecundity and consequently a preference for sons, spread of the practice of dowry across most groups in the region, and the marginalisation of women in agriculture. We believe that all of these factors are tied to the perceived lack of economic utility of women. Current societal circumstances make the cost of having a daughter so high that families may be unwilling to invest scarce resources for their benefit. Similarly, the scarcity of resources causes society to undervalue women, who, as a rule, are not making a visible economic contribution. Attempts to address gender disparities must take into account these underlying issues. However, education and improved economic circumstances alone are likely to be insufficient to change practices that have become culturally, socially, and in some cases legally, enshrined. Programmes and policies aimed at reducing differences at the level of education and employment between men and women must enshrine gender equity as a core value. In this respect Sri Lanka might be considered a role model for the rest of South Asia—minimal gender differences in education and employment levels in Sri Lanka lead to a life expectancy and healthy life expectancy equivalent to those of industrialised countries.
In this sociocultural context, the violation of fundamental human rights, and especially reproductive rights of women, plays an important part in perpetuating gender inequity. It is therefore imperative that a rights based approach be taken across all developmental activities in South Asian countries.
Conclusion
The life advantage for girls and women that is seen in health statistics in industrialised countries is blurred in South Asia where gender—based on social, cultural, and, in some cases, legal constructs and practices—overrides the biological advantage of being born female. Policy makers, programme managers, health professionals, and human rights workers in the developing world and especially in South Asia need to be aware of and responsive to the detrimental health effects that gender plays throughout the life cycle.
Notes
Contributors: FFF developed the idea, provided intellectual content and overall guidance, and is guarantor; OP wrote the initial draft. The final drafts were jointly written by FFF and OP.
Competing interests: None declared.
1. World Health Organization. Gender, health and ageing. Geneva: WHO, 2003. www.who.int/gender/documents/en/Gender_Aging.pdf (accessed 25 Feb 2004).
2. World Health Organization. World health report 2003. Shaping the future. Annex tables. www.who.int/whr/2003/annex/en/ (accessed 25 Feb 2004).
3. Narayan D, Patel R, Schafft K, Rademacher A, Koch-Schulte S. Changing gender relations in the household. In: Voices of the poor: can anyone hear us? New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000. www.worldbank.org/poverty/voices/reports/canany/ch5.pdf (accessed 24 Feb 2004).
4. Jejeebhoy SJ, Sathar ZA. Women's autonomy in India and Pakistan: the influence of region and religion. Popul Dev Rev 2001;27: 687-712.
5. Arnold F, Choe MK, Roy TK. Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Popul Stud 1998;52: 301-15.
6. Banthia JK. Sex composition of the population. In: Provisional population totals. Census of India, series 1 of 2001. www.censusindia.net/data/chapter6.pdf (accessed 24 Feb 2004).
7. Coale AH. Excess female mortality and the balance of the sexes in the population. Popul Dev Rev 1991;17: 517-523.
8. Sen A. Missing women. BMJ 1992;304: 587-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Watts C, Zimmerman C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 2002;359: 1232-7. [PubMed]
10. Allahbadia GN. The 50 million missing women. J Assist Reprod Genet 2002;19: 411-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Sharma DC. Widespread concern over India's missing girls. Lancet 2003;362: 1553. [PubMed]
12. Retherford RD, Roy TK. Factors effecting sex-selective abortion in India. Natl Fam Health Survey Bull 2003;17. www2.eastwestcenter.org/pop/misc/bull-17.pdf (accessed 25 Feb 004).
13. Singh J. India's unwanted girls. BBC 2000 July 11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/828856.stm (accessed 28 Feb 2004).
14. Bindra S. Grim motives behind infant killings. Cable News Network 2003 July 7. www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/south/07/07/india.infanticide.pt1/index.html (accessed 28 Feb 2004).
15. George SM, Dahiya, RS. Female infanticide in Tamil Nadu, India—from recognition back to denial? Reprod Health Matters 1997;5: 124-8.
16. Oberman M. Mothers who kill: cross-cultural patterns in and perspectives on contemporary maternal filicide. Int J Law Psychiatry 2003;26: 493-514. [PubMed]
17. Filmer D, King EM, Pritchett L. Gender disparity in South Asia: comparisons between and within countries. www.worldbank.org/html/dec/Publications/Workpapers/WPS1800series/wps1867/wps1867.pdf (accessed 27 Feb 2004). (World Bank policy research working paper No 1867.)
18. Pande RP. Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings. Demography 2003;40: 395-418. [PubMed]
19. Shaikh S, Mahalanabis D, Chatterjee S, Kurpad AV, Khaled MA. Lean body mass in preschool aged urban children in India: gender difference. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57: 389-93. [PubMed]
20. Choudhury KK, Hanifi MA, Rasheed S, Bhuiya A. Gender inequality and severe malnutrition among children in a remote rural area of Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 2000;18: 123-30. [PubMed]
21. Pande RP, Yazbeck AS. What's in a country average? Wealth, gender, and regional inequalities in immunization in India. Soc Sci Med 2003;57: 2075-88. [PubMed]
22. Abbasi KA, Mirani PH, Parsram A, Sarwar A. Causes, clinical features and outcome of 150 newborns with birth asphyxia at Larkana hospital. Pak Paediatr J 1998;21: 121-5.
23. Pandey A, Sengupta PG, Mondal SK, Gupta DN, Manna B, Ghosh S, et al. Gender differences in healthcare-seeking during common illnesses in a rural community of West Bengal, India. J Health Popul Nutr 2002;20: 306-11. [PubMed]
24. Hasan IJ, Khanum A. Health care utilization during terminal child illness in squatter settlements of Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc 2000;50: 405-9. [PubMed]
25. World Health Organization, South East Asia Regional Office. Reproductive health (adolescent childbearing). In: Women of South-East Asia: a health profile. New Delhi: WHO/SEARO, 2000. http://w3.whosea.org/women/chap3_1f.htm (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
26. Tiwari BK. Country report on India. Paper presented at the regional consultation on nutritional status of adolescent girls and women of reproductive age, 26-28 November 1997. New Delhi: World Health Organization, South East Asia Regional Office, 1998.
27. World Health Organization, South East Asia Regional Office. Prevalence of violence against women (adolescent childbearing). In: Women of South-East Asia: a health profile. New Delhi:WHO/SEARO 2000. http://w3.whosea.org/women/chap6_1f.htm (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
28. Unicef, UNAIDS, World Health Organization. Young people and HIV/AIDS: opportunities in crisis. New York: Unicef, UNAIDS, WHO, 2002.
29. World Health Organization. Gender and HIV/AIDS. www.who.int/gender/documents/en/Gender_factsheet.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
30. Barker G. What about boys? A literature review on the health and development of adolescent boys. Geneva: WHO, 2000. www.who.int/child-adolescenthealth/New_Publications/ADH/WHO_FCH_CAH_00.7.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
31. Khan MM. Suicide on the Indian subcontinent. Crisis 2002;23: 104-7. [PubMed]
32. Brockington L. Suicide in women. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2001;16(suppl 2): S7-19. [PubMed]
33. Ronsmans C. Khlat M. Adolescence and risk of violent death during pregnancy in Matlab, Bangladesh. Lancet 1999;354: 1448. [PubMed]
34. Kumar V. Burnt wives—a study of suicides. Burns 2003;29: 31-5. [PubMed]
35. United Nations Population Fund. State of the world's population. Making one billion count: investing in adolescents' health and rights. New York. UNFPA, 2003.
36. Fikree FF, Bhutta ZA, Marsh DR, Mahmood N, Ali N, Pasha O. State of the world's newborn: Pakistan. Islamabad: Save the Children/US, Pakistan Field Office, 2002.
37. Sugathan KS, Mishra V, Retherford RD. Promoting institutional deliveries in rural India: the role of antenatal-care services. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports 2001;2. www2.eastwestcenter.org/pop/misc/subj-20.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
38. International Institute for Population Sciences, Opinion Research Corporation (ORC MACRO). National family health survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99, India. Mumbai: IIPS, 2000.
39. Bentley ME, Griffiths PL. The burden of anemia among women in India. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57: 52-60. [PubMed]
40. Ahmed F. Anaemia in Bangladesh: a review of prevalence and aetiology. Public Health Nut 2000;3: 385-93. [PubMed]
41. Mari Bhat PN. Maternal mortality in India: an update. In: XXIV International Union for the Scientific Study of Population General Conference, 18-24 August 2001. Salvador, Brazil. Scientific Programme, 2001. www.iussp.org/Brazil2001/s10/S16_01_Bhat.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2004).
42. Bhatia JC. Levels and causes of maternal mortality in southern India. Stud Fam Plann 1993;24: 310-8. [PubMed]
43. Barua A, Kurz K. Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra, India. Reprod Health Matters 2001;9: 53-62. [PubMed]
44. Bloom SS, Wypij D, Das Gupta M. Dimensions of women's autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography 2001;38: 67-78. [PubMed]
45. Khan AJ, Luby SP, Fikree F, Karim A, Obaid S, Dellawala S, et al. Unsafe injections and the transmission of hepatitis B and C in a periurban community in Pakistan. Bull WHO 2000;78: 956-63. [PubMed]
46. Rizvi SFH, Khan MA, Kundi A, Marsh DR, Samad A, Pasha O. Current status of rheumatic heart diseases in rural Pakistan. Heart 2004;90: 394-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Agarwal AK, Yunus M, Ahmad J, Khan A. Rheumatic heart disease in India. J R Soc Health 1995;115: 303-4, 309. [PubMed]
48. Kabir ZN, Tishelman C, Aguero-Torres H, Chowdhury AM, Winblad B, Hojer B. Gender and rural-urban differences in reported health status by older people in Bangladesh. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003;37: 77-91. [PubMed]
49. Prakash IJ. Women and ageing. Indian J Med Res 1997;106: 396-408. [PubMed]
Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group