Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nat Rev Drug Discov. Author manuscript; available in PMC Nov 11, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3822762
Targeting Eosinophils in Allergy, Inflammation and Beyond
Patricia C. Fulkerson, MD, PhD and Marc E. Rothenberg, MD, PhD
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Eosinophils can regulate local immune and inflammatory responses, and their accumulation in the blood and tissue is associated with several inflammatory and infectious diseases. As such, therapies aimed at eosinophils may help control diverse diseases, including atopic disorders such as asthma and allergy, and diseases not primarily associated with eosinophils such as autoimmunity and malignancy. Recently, eosinophil-targeted therapeutic agents aimed at blocking specific steps involved in eosinophil development, migration and activation have entered clinical testing and have produced encouraging results and insights into the role of eosinophils. Herein, we describe recent advances in the development of first generation eosinophil-targeted therapies and highlight strategies for using personalized medicine approaches for eosinophilic disorders.
Eosinophilia (see text box), defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 450 cells per microliter, is associated with numerous disorders including allergies, drug reactions, helminth infections, Churg-Strauss syndrome [glossary], some malignancies and metabolic disorders, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and hypereosinophilic syndrome. Eosinophils are bone marrow-derived leukocytes that are normally less than 5% of leukocytes in the blood, but can be found in higher numbers in tissues such as the bone marrow and gastrointestinal. Recruitment of activated eosinophils from the bloodstream into tissues can occur under a variety of conditions and lead to the release of preformed and newly synthesized products, including cytokines, chemokines, lipid mediators and cytotoxic granule proteins, that can initiate, quickly escalate and sustain local inflammatory and remodeling responses.
Text Box- Blood and Tissue Eosinophilia
Eosinophilia, more than normal numbers of eosinophils, can be found in both the peripheral blood and/or tissues in a variety of disorders, including helminthic parasite infections, atopic and allergic diseases, and adverse drug reactions163,168170. In the peripheral blood, eosinophilia can be characterized as mild (450–1500 eosinophils per microliter), moderate (1500–5000 eosinophils per microliter) or severe (greater than 5000 eosinophils per microliter). Hypereosinophilia refers to blood eosinophils level greater than 1500 eosinophils per microliter. In general, blood eosinophilia results from enhanced eosinophilopoiesis (i.e. increased production of eosinophils in the bone marrow). Peripheral blood eosinophilia can be further categorized as primary, secondary and idiopathic. Primary eosinophilia usually occurs in the context of hematologic malignancies and proliferative disorders that result in increased numbers of progenitors leading to increased numbers of eosinophils in the bone marrow and blood. Secondary eosinophilia is the most common form of eosinophilia and often occurs in response to other primary disease processes such as overproduction of the cytokine IL-5 (often by T-cell lymphocytes) leading to elevated production of eosinophils. Idiopathic eosinophilia is often associated with moderate to severe eosinophilia with no identifiable cause.
In a healthy individual, tissue eosinophils normally can be found primarily in the bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract, but can also be found in smaller numbers in the thymus. The number of eosinophils that normally reside in tissues can vary dramatically, even within the same organ system. For instance, in a healthy gastrointestinal tract eosinophils can be found in increasing numbers from the stomach to the colon, but no eosinophils are present in the normal esophagus. Tissue eosinophilia usually results from increased recruitment of activated eosinophils from the bloodstream. Once recruited into the tissues, activated eosinophils have the capability to cause tissue damage and dysfunction. Tissue eosinophilia does not always correlate with blood eosinophilia. Blood eosinophil numbers can be normal, but increased migration of activated eosinophils from the blood results in significantly increased eosinophil numbers in organs, as is found in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic pneumonias. In contrast, blood eosinophilia can occur without any evidence of increased tissue eosinophilia likely due to the absence of activating signals in the blood stream.
Eosinophil-rich inflammation has long been associated with parasitic infestation and allergic inflammation. A body of evidence including clinical studies and animal models of asthma has demonstrated a causal role for eosinophils in asthma pathogenesis including airway hyper-reactivity, elevated mucus production and airway remodeling. These studies include elegant experiments in eosinophil-lineage-deficient mice that have protection against features of asthma, although not in all cases1,2. Clinical studies have revealed an important role for eosinophils in asthma exacerbations3,4. Recent evidence also supports a broader role for eosinophils in health and disease with their emerging role in malignancy and in regulating antibody production5,6. In addition, eosinophils can frequently be found surrounding solid tumors6,7 and can participate in tumor immune surveillance influencing the incidence of tumor formation8,9. Recent studies have proposed a role for eosinophils in humoral immunity as an important source of pro-survival factors for long-lived plasma cells in the bone marrow10,11. In autoimmune disease in which plasma cells have a pathologic role via autoantibody production, eosinophils may prove to be an attractive therapeutic target. Thus, treatments that specifically target eosinophils are likely to be effective in controlling a number of important and prevalent diseases in the fields of allergy, infectious disease, autoimmunity and malignancy. The increasing incidence of eosinophil-associated disorders, including eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders and asthma, in high income and low income countries highlights the important and expanding need for eosinophil-targeted therapies12,13.
There have traditionally been two major approaches to drug development for eosinophilic diseases: blocking recruitment of eosinophils into organs and impairing the survival of mature eosinophils. As discussed below, innovative new strategies for future drug development include blocking eosinophil production in the bone marrow and inhibiting eosinophil activation.
Eosinophils develop in the bone marrow from hematopoietic stem cells14,15. During human hematopoiesis, common myeloid progenitors give rise to a CD34+IL-5Rα+ eosinophil progenitor14, which is increased in numbers in several diseases including allergies, helminth infections [glossary] and hypereosinophilic syndrome [glossary], suggesting that increased production of eosinophil progenitors is an important checkpoint in disease-associated eosinophilia14,16. Mature human eosinophils contain crystalloid secondary granules, which are primarily composed of highly charged basic proteins, including two major basic proteins, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil peroxidase17. Deposition of granules released from eosinophils in tissues is a common finding in eosinophil-associated diseases and likely contributes to disease pathogenesis1822. Major basic protein and eosinophil peroxidase are toxic to a number of different cell types, including airway epithelial cells23,24 and cardiac muscle cells25, and may contribute to tissue damage and organ dysfunction in patients with asthma or hypereosinophilic syndrome. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eosinophil cationic protein belong to the RNase A family of granule proteins that have ribonuclease activity26, are associated with host defense against viruses27 and may have a role in tissue remodeling28. In addition to these cationic proteins, eosinophil granules contain a plethora of preformed cytokines, chemokines, enzymes and growth factors, which results in diverse biological activity for eosinophils in infection and inflammation29. In addition to preformed mediators stored in the granules, eosinophils can release upon activation de novo-synthesized mediators including IL-4, which has the capacity to stimulate adaptive immunity.
Glucocorticoids are the most effective current therapy used to reduce eosinophil numbers in the blood and tissue (Table 1), but the pleiotropic effects of corticosteroids can result in potentially harmful side effects and limit their therapeutic use. Glucocorticoids promote eosinophil clearance both by directly inducing apoptosis and by inhibiting pro-survival signals induced by cytokines such as IL-3, IL-5 and GM-CSF3032. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib, the first and only drug approved for hypereosinophilic syndrome, can be an effective treatment to reduce blood eosinophil levels, but only for patients who harbor genetic alterations that involve fusion genes that result in hypereosinophilic syndrome, such as the fusion of the FIP1L1 gene with PDGFRA33,34. Therapy directed against the eosinophil growth factor IL-5 is effective in animal studies35 and has recently been tested in clinical trials (as discussed below); while it results in a substantial decrease in blood eosinophil counts in several different diseases, such as hypereosinophilic syndrome, eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis, the reduction of tissue eosinophilia and improvements in symptoms have been variable depending upon the disease and patient subgroup4,3638. These and other new drugs that are based on an improved understanding of the mechanism of eosinophilia and eosinophil effector functions are thus desperately needed.
Table 1
Table 1
Current therapies to treat severe eosinophilia
A network of cytokines, adhesion molecules, chemoattractants and receptors regulate eosinophil trafficking17. A number of these molecules have been investigated as candidates for blocking eosinophil accumulation in tissues.
CCR3 and CCL11
CCR3, a seven-transmembrane cell surface G-protein-coupled receptor, is a promiscuous chemokine receptor that has up to eleven different ligands39,40. These ligands include the eotaxins [CCL11 (also known as eotaxin-1), CCL24 (also known as eotaxin-2) and CCL26 (also known as eotaxin-3)], which are high-affinity agonists for CCR3, a chemokine receptor that is selectively and abundantly expressed on eosinophils and promotes the accumulation of eosinophils. In addition to eosinophil chemoattraction, eotaxin-mediated activation of CCR3 triggers the respiratory burst apparatus, induces eosinophil degranulation and upregulates expression of adhesion molecules41,42.
The CCR3-CCL11 axis is crucial for the recruitment and accumulation of eosinophils in numerous disease states including experimental models of asthma and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders4346. In addition, increased expression of CCR3 and its ligands correlates with severity of disease in patients with asthma47. Thus, antagonism of CCR3 had been a promising target for therapeutic intervention in eosinophil-associated inflammation. In preclinical studies, low-molecular-weight CCR3 antagonists reduced airway eosinophilia in chronic experimental asthma models48,49. A selective, competitive antagonist for CCR3 was evaluated in a Phase II trial (NCT01160224) for effectiveness in reducing sputum eosinophilia in subjects with mild to moderate asthma, but no results have been reported. A neutralizing antibody, bertilimumab, directed against CCL11 (eotaxin-1), has been evaluated for reducing nasal congestion in a Phase II trial; allergen-induced nasal obstruction was significantly reduced, and there was a trend toward reduced numbers of eosinophils in nasal mucosa biopsies, although this trend did not reach statistical significance, perhaps due to the small sample size of patients50. The application of this drug for other eosinophil-associated disorders, such as subgroups of patients with ulcerative colitis, is currently being pursued (NCT01671956).
Although in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies have supported a crucial role for CCR3 and its ligands in recruiting eosinophils into inflamed tissues, the lack of significant efficacy in clinical trials to date may be related to redundant pathways in the diseases being studied. The redundancy of the chemokine and chemokine receptor system and the exquisite sensitivity of eosinophils to other chemoattractant molecules likely contribute to the decreased therapeutic potential of CCR3 blockade. However, there are likely to be some diseases that are more selectively driven by an eotaxin-dependent pathway, such as eosinophilic esophagitis, in which CCL26 is the most highly induced gene in the esophagus and there is limited induction of other major eosinophil chemoattractants51. Indeed, mice genetically engineered to be deficient in CCL11 or CCR3 are protected from the development of esophageal eosinophilia51,52. In addition, since eotaxin elicits eosinophilia in concert with other eosinophil-directed cytokines such as IL-5, combination therapy with IL-5-targeted and eotaxin- or CCR3-targeted therapy may be more effective. Indeed, mice with targeted ablation of IL-5 and eotaxin-1 have increased protection against experimental asthma compared with ablation of either gene alone53.
Adhesion Molecules
Eosinophil migration from the bloodstream into various tissues results from a specific interaction between integrins on the surface of eosinophils with adhesion receptors on the surface of the vascular endothelium17. In experimental models, recruitment of eosinophils into the lung in response to allergen challenge is dependent on VLA-4 (Very Late Antigen-4, an integrin dimer composed of CD49d and CD29)54, prompting investigations into targeting VLA-4 to inhibit eosinophil accumulation in inflamed lungs. Preclinical studies demonstrated that VLA-4 blockade using a CD49d-specific antibody inhibited airway eosinophilia in an experimental asthma model55. Small-molecule VLA-4 antagonists have also been evaluated for potential clinical utility, with studies demonstrating inhibition of eosinophil adhesion to VLA-4 and a significant reduction (up to 80%) in skin eosinophilia induced by intradermal injection of CCL11 in mice56.
Of note, marked peripheral blood eosinophilia (more than 2000 cells per mm3) in three patients with multiple sclerosis has been reported to develop following treatment with natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD49d57. Whether this was mediated by a direct inhibitory effect on eosinophil adhesion resulting in retention of eosinophils in the bloodstream is worthy of determining. Taken together, these data suggest that while blockade of integrin and adhesion receptor interaction could result in decreased eosinophil accumulation in tissues, there is the potential for inducing secondary blood eosinophilia with its associated risks, which could limit the therapeutic benefit of this strategy.
CRTH2 and PGD2
Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) is a product of arachidonic acid metabolism that is generated and released by activated mast cells during an allergic response58. PGD2 induces eosinophil chemotaxis and mobilization of mature eosinophils from the bone marrow59,60. The effects of PGD2 are mediated through two G-protein-coupled receptors, DP1 and CRTH2 (Chemoattractant Receptor of Th2 cells; also known as DP2, GPR44 and CD294). CRTH2 is expressed on the surface of Th2 cells, eosinophils and basophils61.
In experimental asthma models, CRTH2 mediates eosinophil recruitment into the lung61,62. Furthermore, PGD2 activates eosinophils via CRTH2 resulting in release of granule proteins and respiratory burst activity63. As PGD2 signaling results not only in eosinophil recruitment but also in eosinophil activation and mobilization of mature eosinophils from the bone marrow, the potential for clinical benefit from intervening in this pathway is high. Thus, antagonizing CRTH2 has been pursued as a potentially useful strategy for treatment of eosinophil-associated disorders. Low-molecular-mass CRTH2 antagonists partially attenuate pulmonary eosinophilia in a number of different models64,65. A published Phase II study of the effectiveness of a CRTH2 antagonist in patients with moderate persistent asthma showed a significant reduction in the geometric mean sputum eosinophil count from 2.1% to 0.7% after treatment66. While this may appear to be a small difference, reductions in sputum eosinophils (even at this low level) correlates very well with improved asthma control67. Another Phase II study is in progress to evaluate CRTH2 effects on reducing sputum eosinophilia in patients with persistent asthma (NCT01545726). Preliminary data from a clinical trial treating patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis with a CRTH2 antagonist show a moderate reduction in tissue eosinophilia68. More clinical studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of blockade of CRTH2, and possibly DP1, on blood and tissue eosinophilia in human disease.
Histamine H4 Receptor
The histamine H4 receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor expressed on cells of the immune system, including eosinophils. Activation of the H4 receptor by its ligand histamine results in eosinophil chemotaxis to sites of allergic inflammation and increased expression of adhesion molecules on the surface of eosinophils69,70. Small-molecule antagonists of the H4 receptor inhibit eosinophil migration in vitro71,72. In addition, antagonism of the H4 receptor inhibit eosinophil infiltration into the esophageal epithelium in an allergen-induced model of eosinophilic esophagitis in guinea pigs73. To date, only preclinical assessment of candidate drugs targeting H4 receptors have been completed, but the results from these studies advocate the H4 receptor as a drug target for the treatment of eosinophil inflammatory disorders72,74.
Interleukin-13 and Interleukin-4
Numerous studies to date support an important role for IL-13 in eosinophil-associated disorders75,76. In animal models, IL-13 is a key cytokine that regulates the recruitment of eosinophils into inflammatory sites, primarily through induction of chemokine expression77,78. For example, a whole genome expression analysis of primary human esophageal epithelial cells showed that CCL26 exhibited the greatest increase in expression levels following induction with IL-1379.
In patients with asthma, expression of IL-13 has been associated with eosinophil recruitment into the airway in response to allergen challenge80,81. Thus, it has been hypothesized that IL-13 neutralization would inhibit allergen-induced eosinophil inflammation. However, when the effectiveness of two fully humanized IL-13–specific antibodies on allergen-induced responses in mild asthmatics was recently assessed, there were no changes in peripheral blood eosinophil numbers or sputum eosinophils82. Treatment of patients with uncontrolled asthma with lebrikizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds IL-13, resulted in modestly increased peripheral blood eosinophil counts, suggesting that IL-13 blockade decreased eosinophil recruitment from the bloodstream into the lungs, but in patients with persistently increased eosinophil production this may lead to blood eosinophilia83. In addition, an IL-13-blocking antibody had no effect on nasal lavage eosinophil numbers in patients with allergic rhinitis in a nasal allergen challenge model84.
These studies suggest that IL-13 blockade alone may be insufficient to inhibit tissue eosinophilia and blood eosinophilia, likely due to overlapping roles of IL-13 and IL-4 in promoting eosinophil-rich inflammation85,86. Accordingly, the therapeutic effects of pitrakinra, an IL-4 variant and fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-4Rα that blocks both IL-4 and IL-13 activity, have been investigated in Phase II clinical trials87,88. However, inhibition of the biological activity of both IL-4 and IL-13 resulted in no significant change in the number of sputum eosinophils87,88 or peripheral blood eosinophils88 in atopic asthmatics.
Summary of Blockade of Eosinophil Recruitment
Preclinical studies suggest that blockade of eosinophil migration from the bloodstream into tissues has the potential to be therapeutically useful, but there has been limited clinical success to date with current targets and approaches. Studies have emphasized the importance of selecting patients to participate in clinical trials on the basis of mechanism of action of the drug4,83,89 and that the lack of efficacy may be due to inclusion of patients not likely to respond to the drug on the basis of the patients’ varying phenotypes90. For example, the effectiveness of lebrikizumab treatment was greater in patients with high periostin [glossary] and blood eosinophil levels, suggesting that these biomarkers could be used to identify patients with an asthma phenotype that is driven by IL-1383. It is notable that these may be the specific group of patients that are more likely to respond to specific and effective anti-eosinophil therapeutics either alone or in combination with anti-IL-13/IL-4 blockers. More work is needed to identify those patients who would be most likely to respond to migration-targeted therapy. The lack of effectiveness of current targets may also be due to the complex regulation of eosinophil recruitment into inflammatory tissue, especially the lung, which is often the first organ for which eosinophil-targeted therapy is tested (because of the large potential market for asthma); a single target may be insufficient to block tissue eosinophilia and prevent eosinophil-mediated pathology.
Eosinophils are differentiated from multipotent stem cells in the bone marrow under the influence IL-3, GM-CSF and IL-591. The most eosinophil-specific of these cytokines is IL-5, which has key roles in proliferation and maturation of the committed progenitors, as well as in migration and survival of mature eosinophils92,93. As differentiation and maturation of the developing eosinophil progresses, the cell loses the capacity to proliferate. The life cycle of the terminally differentiated mature eosinophil usually ends physiologically by apoptosis, although necrosis with release of functionally active granules, especially following cellular activation, can also occur. It is notable that eosinophilic inflammatory tissue often contains abundant and intact granules that are extracellular to the eosinophil, suggesting that these may be functionally relevant in the pathogenesis of disease94. Eosinophils have high rates of spontaneous apoptosis95, and a several mediators, including IL-5, promote eosinophil survival32,96,97. Agents that interfere with survival signals for eosinophils are being actively developed and have begun to be tested for therapeutic value.
IL-5 andIL-5Rα
As IL-5 signal transduction has been shown to participate in eosinophil development, survival and effector function, IL-5 and its specific receptor subunit IL-5Rα have been attractive therapeutic targets for eosinophil-associated disorders93. Two different humanized IL-5–specific antibodies, mepolizumab and reslizumab, have been developed and tested in clinical trials for asthma3,4,89, hypereosinophilic syndrome36, eosinophilic esophagitis [glossary]37,98,99 and nasal polyposis100. Treatment with IL-5-targeted therapy results in a dramatic decline in blood eosinophilia but has variable efficacy in reducing tissue eosinophilia and no effect on the numbers of eosinophil progenitors in the bone marrow. IL-5-targeted therapy reduced esophageal eosinophil infiltration99 and intraepithelial eosinophil counts37,101 in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis but had variable effects on symptoms, which was in part likely to be related to the use of non-disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures37,101. In asthma, initial studies showed no improvement in lung function in patients with asthma who were treated with reslizumab, but post-hoc analysis of patients to identify those with sputum eosinophilia at baseline showed a significant increase in pulmonary function for patients receiving reslizumab compared with placebo3,102. In other studies that included patients with persistent asthma and with baseline sputum eosinophilia, reductions in severe exacerbations4 and in daily corticosteroid dose89 and improvements in lung function3,38 were observed for those patients receiving IL-5-targeted therapy. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting patients with eosinophilia in disease-related tissues such as the airway in patients with asthma for maximum therapeutic benefit.
Another approach to blocking eosinophils is to therapeutically target the IL-5 receptor with a neutralizing and cytotoxic antibody. Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to IL-5Rα and blocks the biological activity of IL-5. Importantly, benralizumab also induces apoptosis of eosinophils through antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity103. As benralizumab reduced the numbers of peripheral blood eosinophils and eosinophil precursors in the bone marrow of non-human primates103, there is considerable potential in targeting IL-5Rα for clinical efficacy in eosinophil-associated diseases. In early Phase I/II studies, benralizumab treatment resulted in significant and prolonged peripheral blood eosinopenia [glossary] in patients with mild atopic asthma104.
Another strategy used to inhibit IL-5-mediated effects of eosinophils is through downregulation of the other subunit of the IL-5 receptor, the common β chain (βc chain), which is shared with IL-3, IL-5 and GM-CSF receptors. The inhaled antisense oligonucleotide [glossary] drug candidate TPI ASM8 contains antisense oligonucleotides directed against the mRNA for human CCR3 and βc. In an open-label study, TPI ASM8 reduced allergen-induced sputum eosinophil and eosinophil progenitor recruitment into the airway105. Further studies are ongoing to test the clinical usefulness of this strategy of downregulating receptors that are important for growth and recruitment of eosinophils via degradation of their respective mRNA. Improvements in the delivery and longevity of antisense oligonucleotides will help increase the clinical potential of this technology106,107. Another possibility, although not yet tested for eosinophil-associated diseases, is promoting the expression of the soluble form of IL-5Rα through the use of splice-switching oligonucleotides [glossary]. This strategy was effective in mouse models of arthritis in which a splice-switching oligonucleotide switched expression from a membrane-bound form of the TNF-α receptor to a secreted, soluble form that bound TNF-α in the bloodstream and antagonized its activity108.
Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (siglecs) are surface proteins expressed predominately by leukocytes. Siglec-8 is selectively expressed on human eosinophils and mast cells, while its murine functional paralog Siglec-F is expressed by eosinophils but not mast cells109. Engagement of Siglec-8 on the surface of eosinophils by a cross-linking antibody results in pronounced cell death via apoptosis110. Preclinical studies with Siglec-F-deficient mice demonstrated that Siglec-F is important in regulating eosinophil survival in experimental models of asthma111. Further, administration of Siglec-F-targeted antibodies to mice over-expressing IL-5 which leads to hypereosinophilia, resulted in induction of eosinophil apoptosis and rapid reduction in blood and tissue eosinophilia112. Treatment of mice with Siglec-F-targeted antibody also resulted in decreased eosinophil accumulation in the intestinal mucosa and decreased blood and bone marrow eosinophilia in a model of allergen-induced gastrointestinal inflammation113.
Together, these preclinical studies strongly support continued investigations into Siglec-8-targeted therapies for eosinophil-associated disorders, as engagement of Siglec-8 results in robust and selective apoptosis of eosinophils. Active research is currently underway to fully characterize the endogenous ligands for Siglec-8 and the enzymes required for its synthesis114.
Immunoglobulin E
Omalizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody that binds immunoglobulin E (IgE) and prevents it from binding to its receptor FcεRI on the surface of mast cells and basophils. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that omalizumab is effective in reducing exacerbations, corticosteroid use and other clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe asthma 115118. In studies where eosinophilia was measured, there was evidence that IgE-targeted treatment had an impact on eosinophilia. For example, individuals with allergic asthma receiving omalizumab therapy had reduced mean percentages of sputum eosinophils (6.6 to 1.7%) and bronchial eosinophils (8 to 1.5 cells/mm2) compared to patients receiving placebo119.
Pooled analysis from five randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials with patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma revealed a decrease in baseline mean blood eosinophils by a median of 18.8% post treatment with omalizumab (compared to 2.1% with placebo)120. The mechanism by which the reduction in circulating IgE with omalizumab therapy also leads to a reduction in blood and tissue eosinophils remains unclear. Omalizumab-treated patients have increased levels of eosinophil apoptosis compared to placebo-treated patients, but the reason for the increased apoptosis is undefined121.
In a small open-label trial evaluating omalizumab in patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, mean blood eosinophil counts were significantly decreased (47%) with omalizumab treatment122. Eosinophils in the duodenum and stomach declined but not significantly, and esophageal eosinophilia remained unchanged. Studies focused on understanding how IgE modulates blood and tissue eosinophilia are needed and may yield potential new therapeutic targets.
Inhibitory Receptors
Immune responses are regulated by an intricate network of positive and negative signals123. While a vast majority of studies have focused on activation receptors on cells of the immune system, recent evidence supports an important role for inhibitory receptors in maintaining immune homeostasis124. Eosinophils are known to express a number of different inhibitory receptors in addition to Siglec-8 (described above)125,126. Preclinical studies have emphasized a key role for inhibitory receptors in the regulation of eosinophil survival and activation. The inhibitory receptor CD300a can has been shown to override eosinophil survival signals mediated by IL-5, IL-3 and GM-CSF127. In addition, a recent study provides evidence for the inhibitory receptor CD172a as a negative regulator of eosinophil survival, as well as eosinophil degranulation, in the intestine128. Eosinophil chemotaxis is also counter-regulated by inhibitory receptors129, emphasizing that inhibitory receptors are key regulators not only of cell survival but also of effector functions. The potential for targeting these inhibitory receptors in eosinophil-rich inflammatory states was shown in a study in which treatment with a bispecific antibody fragment that recognized both CD300a and CCR3 reversed airway eosinophilia in an experimental model of chronic asthma130.
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an IL-7-like cytokine expressed primarily by activated epithelial cells that signals through a heterodimeric receptor (comprised of a TSLP-specific binding chain and the IL-7Rα chain)131. TSLP has diverse effects, but its primary target appears to be dendritic cells, through which it promotes differentiation of Th2 cells that produce IL-4, IL-13 and IL-5132134. Transgenic mice that overexpress TSLP have elevated serum levels of IL-5, suggesting TSLP has a role in the promotion of eosinophilia via induction of Th2 cytokine expression135.
TSLP has also been shown to have direct effects on human eosinophils – providing pro-survival signals, modulating expression of adhesion molecules on the surface and stimulating bacterial killing by eosinophils136,137. A human sequence variant associated with elevated blood eosinophil counts was identified in the 5q22 chromosomal region, which contains TSLP, supporting an association between eosinophilia and TSLP138. In a genome-wide association study aimed at identifying susceptibility loci for eosinophilic esophagitis, TSLP at chromosome 5q22 was identified as an important candidate gene in disease pathogenesis, with TSLP being overexpressed in esophageal biopsies from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis compared to controls139. These and other studies have prompted the development of therapeutic agents targeting TSLP, such as a fully monoclonal antibody (AMG 157) that blocks interaction of TSLP with its receptor. A phase I trial (NCT01405963) is underway to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of AMG 157 in mild atopic asthma.
Eosinophil Activation
The clinical severity of many eosinophil-associated disorders is believed to be a reflection of the extent of eosinophil activation in the tissues. Indeed there is a subgroup of patients with marked blood eosinophilia but no evidence of clinical pathology or organ dysfunction140. The eosinophils from these patients have reduced markers of activation when compared to those from patients with eosinophil-mediated organ damage, and their eosinophils show little to no evidence of degranulation when examined by electron microscopy. In contrast, studies have shown that airway eosinophils isolated from patients with asthma after allergen challenge display enhanced responsiveness to numerous mediators, with greater superoxide generation and degranulation compared to blood eosinophils141,142. The increased capacity of tissue-derived eosinophils to respond to mediators results from a process referred to as “priming” and has been recapitulated in vitro via exposure to IL-5, GM-CSF and other cytokines143,144.
Collectively, these studies suggest that inhibiting eosinophil priming and activation in patients may result in decreased tissue eosinophilia and organ damage. It is notable that IL-5-specific antibody therapy reduces levels of circulating eosinophil-derived neurotoxin36 and responsiveness of eosinophils to CCL11, providing evidence that anti-IL-5 may be the first agent that selectively inhibits eosinophil effector function145.
In addition to mediators such as PGD2 and IL-5 (discussed above) several other mediators can induce eosinophil activation, and as such might be beneficial therapeutic targets. The cytokine IL-33, a member of the IL-1 family of cytokines and a ligand for ST2 [glossary], is a potent eosinophil activator146148. In preclinical studies, treatment with an IL-33-blocking antibody and soluble ST2 markedly decreased tissue eosinophilia in experimental models of asthma and allergic rhinitis149151, supporting further investigations into this activating pathway.
Similar to priming of eosinophils by cytokines, Notch signaling has a role in regulating eosinophil activation state and effector functions152,153. The Notch pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway that has a key role in deciding the fate of progenitor cells154 as well as regulating immune cell activation155. In addition to eosinophil priming, Notch signaling regulates eosinophil maturation152,156. These findings are relevant as treatment with an inhibitor of Notch signaling (LY450139 dihydrate) in a clinical trial for Alzheimer disease resulted unexpectedly in a statistically significant mean increase (47%) in blood eosinophils in patients157.
Further studies are needed to identify key regulators and potential checkpoints that result in eosinophil activation and priming and thereby lead to enhanced tissue infiltration, degranulation and synthesis of mediators, as knowledge of these regulators and checkpoints may lead to the design of novel therapeutics.
Eosinophil Production
Atopy [glossary], helminth infections and allergen challenge have all been shown to be associated with increased eosinophil progenitor cells (CD34+IL-5Rα+ cells) in the bone marrow, highlighting the importance of the bone marrow in contributing to eosinophil-associated disorders1416. Furthermore, increased numbers of eosinophil progenitors have been identified within allergic nasal and airway mucosa and in sputum from patients with asthma patients, suggesting eosinophil differentiation in situ may contribute to the accumulation of effector eosinophils in tissues158160.
While IL-5-targeted therapy is very effective in reducing mature eosinophil counts in the blood and bone marrow, the number of eosinophil progenitors and capacity to produce eosinophils from the bone marrow is unchanged,161 which has important implications for patients when therapy is discontinued. Agents directed at specifically blocking production or survival of the eosinophil progenitor has the potential to be a long-lasting and specific therapy. As mentioned above, eosinophil precursors in the bone marrow of non-human primates were reduced following treatment with benralizumab103, indicating that targeting progenitors via cell surface markers is a viable approach to inhibiting eosinophilia. Research focused on further characterizing the biology of the eosinophil progenitor to identify specific surface markers, as well as proliferative and survival signals, may indeed result in new approaches to target eosinophils.
Sub-phenotyping Eosinophilic Disorders
Post-hoc analyses of data from clinical trials have emphasized the importance of including patients that will likely receive the most therapeutic benefit from a specific agent. For example, in a clinical study in subjects with severe persistent asthma there was an increase in lung function (mean increase in FEV1 [glossary] of 0.29L) after receiving IL-5-specific antibody therapy in a subgroup of subjects with baseline sputum eosinophil levels greater than 3%102. In subjects with baseline sputum eosinophils less than 3%, there was no difference in change in lung function between those receiving IL-5-specific antibody therapy or placebo, emphasizing the importance of phenotyping patients for baseline eosinophilia to maximize therapeutic benefit. It is interesting to note that eosinophilic asthmatic patients are particularly sensitive to the effects of anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-13 when separately used38,83. Elevated levels of serum periostin correlate with eosinophil levels and responsiveness to anti-IL-13, raising the possibility that this subgroup of patients should also be treated with anti-eosinophil therapy, either alone or in combination with anti-IL-13. Blood and tissue eosinophilia can occur in a wide variety of disease processes162 and hypereosinophilic syndrome is a heterogeneous disorder that often has no identifiable cause163. Thus, it is necessary to identify sub-phenotypes of patients with eosinophilic disorders in order to predict treatment responses on the basis of a patient’s genetics or gene expression profiles of affected organs and to tailor therapy for their eosinophil-associated disease accordingly. This approach has proven very effective in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome, with treatment plans being selected on the basis of the mechanism of eosinophilia (i.e. fusion-gene expression), and we believe this should now should be implemented in other more prevalent eosinophilic disorders such as eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders.
Indeed, whole-genome transcript expression profile analysis has identified a disease-specific tissue transcriptome in the esophagus of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis51,79. The transcriptome analysis has been limited to esophageal biopsies which typically represent mucosa (epithelium and lamina propria) rather than deeper layers of the esophagus. Notably, the transcript is not enriched for eosinophil-specific genes because eosinophils contain relatively low amounts of mRNA compared with other inflammatory and resident cells. Rather, the eosinophilic esophagitis transcriptome provides insight into effector pathways involved in eosinophilic inflammation and can distinguish patients with differing levels of mucosal inflammation as well patients who have been exposed to specific drugs such as topical glucocorticoids164. As such, the use of tissue transcript profiling enables an eosinophilic esophagitis diagnostic panel to be derived to monitor disease diagnosis, patient prognosis and responsiveness to therapy51,164166. It is anticipated that patient-specific information, derived from tissue transcriptome or cytokine expression analysis, would enable and customize key decisions about the degree and mechanism of tissue inflammation, the compliance with medications and the responsiveness to therapeutic intervention51,165,167.
Eosinophil accumulation in the blood and tissue is associated with a number of prevalent infectious and inflammatory disorders. Traditionally, therapy for eosinophilic disorders has primarily focused on glucocorticoids, but these agents are often toxic and variable degrees of drug resistance are common. More recently, drug development has focused on blocking eosinophil recruitment into organs and impairing their survival and activation. Clinical trials with first-generation eosinophil-targeted therapeutic agents are now underway and appear particularly promising, especially those that target IL-5 and its receptor. Challenges that need to be addressed as new agents are evaluated include residual tissue eosinophilia as reported in the trials to evaluate the efficacy of IL-5-specific antibodies and refractory response as seen in some patients treated with glucocorticoids. In addition, as therapeutic agents become more effective in blocking eosinophilia, the potential beneficial role for eosinophils in maintaining good health may come to the forefront and need to be addressed. Another substantial challenge for the future is identifying the sub-phenotypes of patients with other complex eosinophilic diseases, such as allergic asthma and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and determining how particular sub-phenotypes respond to specific agents on the basis of their disease characteristics and pathophysiology. Indeed, a personalized medicine approach has already proven to be crucial and effective, as demonstrated by patients with the PDGFRA-associated myeloproliferative form of hypereosinophilic syndrome, who are generally very responsive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib. Application of tissue transcriptome analysis offers opportunity to further advance personalized and predictive medicine for eosinophilic disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, as tissue biopsies are standard-of-care and such analysis has already proven feasible and useful.
Table 2
Table 2
New therapeutic strategies for eosinophilia
Churg-Strauss Syndromeis a rare systemic necrotizing vasculitis affecting small to medium-sized vessels, and characterized by late-onset asthma, blood eosinophilia, and eosinophil-rich granulomatous inflammation in affected tissues. First-line treatment is corticosteroids.
Eosinophilopoiesisis the process of eosinophil production in the bone marrow.
Blood eosinophiliais defined as greater than 450 eosinophils per microliter of blood.
Tissue eosinophiliais greater than normal numbers of eosinophils in a particular tissue.
Helminth infectionis an infection with a parasitic worm and the most common cause of eosinophilia world-wide. Helminth infections are most common in the developing world. Infections with helminths can arise through mosquito transmission, eating infected food, drinking contaminated water and walking on contaminated soil.
Hypereosinophilic Syndromesare a heterogenous group of disorders characterized by a persistently elevated peripheral blood eosinophil count (>1500/mm3) without any recognizable cause and evidence of tissue eosinophilia.
Periostinis a extracellular matrix protein that interacts with integrin molecules on epithelial and leukocyte cell surfaces. Periostin expression is induced by Th2 cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-13, and has recently been shown to promote allergic inflammation, including the accumulation of eosinophils in the skin.
Eosinophilic esophagitisis a chronic disease characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, evidence eosinophil infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power microscopy field on esophageal biopsy, and exclusion of other possible causes of esophageal eosinophilia, especially gastrointestinal reflux induced esophageal eosinophilia.
Eosinopeniais where the number of eosinophils in the blood or tissue is lower than expected. Eosinopenia can be caused by stress reactions, bacterial infections and the use of corticosteroids.
Antisense oligonucleotidesare synthesized strands of nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) that are complementary to a specific messenger RNA. They bind to their target messenger RNA to promote degradation of the messenger RNA and prevent translation from occurring. This can ultimately lead to decreased expression of a particular protein.
Splice-switching oligonucleotideare similar to antisense oligonucleotides in that they target and bind to a particular messenger RNA; however, instead of promoting degradation of the messenger RNA of targeted genes they can be designed to promote favorable splice variants.
ST2is a component of the receptor for IL-33 that is widely expressed by innate immune cells and a subset of T cell lymphocytes.
Atopyis the predisposition to develop allergic hypersensitivity (IgE-mediated) reactions. Atopy results from both hereditary and environmental components.
FEV1(forced expiratory volume) is the maximal amount of air that an individual can forcefully exhale in one second as calculated during pulmonary function testing. A normal FEV1 is predicted based on height, weight and race. A lower than normal FEV1 is a marker of an obstructive process such as asthma.
Eotaxin family of chemokinesis a subset of structurally related chemokines that bind to the eotaxin receptor (CCR3) and are involved in selectively activating and chemoattracting eosinophils.

1. Lee JJ, et al. Defining a link with asthma in mice congenitally deficient in eosinophils. Science. 2004;305:1773–1776. [PubMed]
2. Humbles AA, et al. A critical role for eosinophils in allergic airways remodeling. Science. 2004;305:1776–1779. [PubMed]
3. Castro M, et al. Reslizumab for poorly controlled, eosinophilic asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2011;184:1125–1132. [PubMed]
4. Haldar P, et al. Mepolizumab and exacerbations of refractory eosinophilic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:973–984. [PubMed]
5. Jacobsen EA, Helmers RA, Lee JJ, Lee NA. The expanding role(s) of eosinophils in health and disease. Blood. 2012 [PubMed]
6. Lee JJ, Jacobsen EA, McGarry MP, Schleimer RP, Lee NA. Eosinophils in health and disease: the LIAR hypothesis. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2010;40:563–575. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lowe D, Jorizzo J, Hutt MS. Tumour-associated eosinophilia: a review. J. Clin. Pathol. 1981;34:1343–1348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Cormier SA, et al. Pivotal Advance: eosinophil infiltration of solid tumors is an early and persistent inflammatory host response. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006;79:1131–1139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Simson L, et al. Regulation of carcinogenesis by IL-5 and CCL11: a potential role for eosinophils in tumor immune surveillance. J. Immunol. 2007;178:4222–4229. [PubMed]
10. Chu VT, et al. Eosinophils are required for the maintenance of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:151–159. [PubMed]
11. Chu VT, Berek C. Immunization induces activation of bone marrow eosinophils required for plasma cell survival. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012;42:130–137. [PubMed]
12. Hruz P, et al. Escalating incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis: a 20-year prospective, population-based study in Olten County, Switzerland. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;128:1349–1350. [PubMed]
13. Bohm M, et al. Mucosal Eosinophilia: Prevalence and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Symptoms and Endoscopic Findings in Adults Over 10 Years in an Urban Hospital. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2011 [PubMed]
14. Mori Y, et al. Identification of the human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor: revision of phenotypic definition of the human common myeloid progenitor. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:183–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Iwasaki H, et al. Identification of eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors in the murine bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:1891–1897. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sehmi R, et al. Allergen-induced increases in IL-5 receptor alpha-subunit expression on bone marrow-derived CD34+ cells from asthmatic subjects. A novel marker of progenitor cell commitment towards eosinophilic differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100:2466–2475. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Hogan SP, et al. Eosinophils: biological properties and role in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2008;38:709–750. [PubMed]
18. Ahlstrom-Emanuelsson CA, Greiff L, Andersson M, Persson CG, Erjefalt JS. Eosinophil degranulation status in allergic rhinitis: observations before and during seasonal allergen exposure. Eur. Respir. J. 2004;24:750–757. [PubMed]
19. Filley WV, Holley KE, Kephart GM, Gleich GJ. Identification by immunofluorescence of eosinophil granule major basic protein in lung tissues of patients with bronchial asthma. Lancet. 1982;2:11–16. [PubMed]
20. Kephart GM, et al. Marked deposition of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010;105:298–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Noguchi H, Kephart GM, Colby TV, Gleich GJ. Tissue eosinophilia and eosinophil degranulation in syndromes associated with fibrosis. Am. J Pathol. 1992;140:521–528. [PubMed]
22. Chung HL, et al. Deposition of eosinophil-granule major basic protein and expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in the mucosa of the small intestine in infants with cow's milk-sensitive enteropathy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999;103:1195–1201. [PubMed]
23. Brottman GM, Regelmann WE, Slungaard A, Wangensteen OD. Effect of eosinophil peroxidase on airway epithelial permeability in the guinea pig. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1996;21:159–166. [PubMed]
24. Gleich GJ, Frigas E, Loegering DA, Wassom DL, Steinmuller D. Cytotoxic properties of the eosinophil major basic protein. J Immunol. 1979;123:2925–2927. [PubMed]
25. Tai PC, Hayes DJ, Clark JB, Spry CJ. Toxic effects of human eosinophil products on isolated rat heart cells in vitro. Biochem. J. 1982;204:75–80. [PubMed]
26. Rosenberg HF. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin / RNase 2: connecting the past, the present and the future. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008;9:135–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Domachowske JB, Dyer KD, Bonville CA, Rosenberg HF. Recombinant human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/RNase 2 functions as an effective antiviral agent against respiratory syncytial virus. J. Infect. Dis. 1998;177:1458–1464. [PubMed]
28. Hernnas J, et al. Eosinophil cationic protein alters proteoglycan metabolism in human lung fibroblast cultures. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1992;59:352–363. [PubMed]
29. Muniz VS, Weller PF, Neves JS. Eosinophil crystalloid granules: structure, function, and beyond. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2012 [PubMed]
30. Meagher LC, Cousin JM, Seckl JR, Haslett C. Opposing effects of glucocorticoids on the rate of apoptosis in neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes. J. Immunol. 1996;156:4422–4428. [PubMed]
31. Druilhe A, Letuve S, Pretolani M. Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in human eosinophils: mechanisms of action. Apoptosis. 2003;8:481–495. [PubMed]
32. Her E, Frazer J, Austen KF, Owen WF., Jr Eosinophil hematopoietins antagonize the programmed cell death of eosinophils. Cytokine and glucocorticoid effects on eosinophils maintained by endothelial cell-conditioned medium. J. Clin. Invest. 1991;88:1982–1987. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Jain N, et al. Imatinib has limited therapeutic activity for hypereosinophilic syndrome patients with unknown or negative PDGFRalpha mutation status. Leuk. Res. 2009;33:837–839. [PubMed]
34. Ogbogu PU, et al. Hypereosinophilic syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;124:1319–1325. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Hamelmann E, et al. Anti-interleukin 5 but not anti-IgE prevents airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 1999;160:934–941. [PubMed]
36. Rothenberg ME, et al. Treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with mepolizumab. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1215–1228. [PubMed]
37. Stein ML, et al. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006;118:1312–1319. [PubMed]
38. Pavord ID, et al. Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:651–659. [PubMed]
39. Gong L, Wilhelm RS. CCR3 antagonists: a survey of the patent literature. Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009;19:1109–1132. [PubMed]
40. Pease JE, Williams TJ. Eotaxin and asthma. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2001;1:248–253. [PubMed]
41. Tenscher K, Metzner B, Schopf E, Norgauer J, Czech W. Recombinant human eotaxin induces oxygen radical production, Ca(2+)-mobilization, actin reorganization, and CD11b upregulation in human eosinophils via a pertussis toxin-sensitive heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein. Blood. 1996;88:3195–3199. [PubMed]
42. Kampen GT, et al. Eotaxin induces degranulation and chemotaxis of eosinophils through the activation of ERK2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases. Blood. 2000;95:1911–1917. [PubMed]
43. Fulkerson PC, Fischetti CA, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophils and CCR3 regulate interleukin-13 transgene-induced pulmonary remodeling. Am. J. Pathol. 2006;169:2117–2126. [PubMed]
44. Fulkerson PC, et al. A central regulatory role for eosinophils and the eotaxin/CCR3 axis in chronic experimental allergic airway inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:16418–16423. [PubMed]
45. Ahrens R, et al. Intestinal macrophage/epithelial cell-derived CCL11/eotaxin-1 mediates eosinophil recruitment and function in pediatric ulcerative colitis. J. Immunol. 2008;181:7390–7399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Waddell A, et al. Colonic eosinophilic inflammation in experimental colitis is mediated by Ly6C(high) CCR2(+) inflammatory monocyte/macrophage-derived CCL11. J. Immunol. 2011;186:5993–6003. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Ying S, et al. Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 mRNA and protein in atopic asthma. Association with airway hyperresponsiveness and predominant co-localization of eotaxin mRNA to bronchial epithelial and endothelial cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997;27:3507–3516. [PubMed]
48. Wegmann M, et al. Effects of a low-molecular-weight CCR-3 antagonist on chronic experimental asthma. Am.. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007;36:61–67. [PubMed]
49. Komai M, et al. A novel CC-chemokine receptor 3 antagonist, Ki19003, inhibits airway eosinophilia and subepithelial/peribronchial fibrosis induced by repeated antigen challenge in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2010;112:203–213. [PubMed]
50. Ding C, Li J, Zhang X. Bertilimumab Cambridge Antibody Technology Group. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2004;5:1213–1218. [PubMed]
51. Blanchard C, et al. Eotaxin-3 and a uniquely conserved gene-expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116:536–547. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Zuo L, et al. IL-13 induces esophageal remodeling and gene expression by an eosinophil-independent, IL-13R alpha 2-inhibited pathway. J. Immunol. 2010;185:660–669. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Mattes J, et al. Intrinsic defect in T cell production of interleukin (IL)-13 in the absence of both IL-5 and eotaxin precludes the development of eosinophilia and airways hyperreactivity in experimental asthma. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:1433–1444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Nakajima H, Sano H, Nishimura T, Yoshida S, Iwamoto I. Role of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1/very late activation antigen 4 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1/lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 interactions in antigen-induced eosinophil and T cell recruitment into the tissue. J. Exp. Med. 1994;179:1145–1154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Henderson WR, Jr, et al. Blockade of CD49d (alpha4 integrin) on intrapulmonary but not circulating leukocytes inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100:3083–3092. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Okigami H, et al. Inhibition of eosinophilia in vivo by a small molecule inhibitor of very late antigen (VLA)-4. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007;559:202–209. [PubMed]
57. Abbas M, et al. Hypereosinophilia in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab. Neurology. 2011;77:1561–1564. [PubMed]
58. Schleimer RP, et al. Role of human basophils and mast cells in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1985;76:369–374. [PubMed]
59. Schratl P, et al. The role of the prostaglandin D2 receptor, DP, in eosinophil trafficking. J. Immunol. 2007;179:4792–4799. [PubMed]
60. Royer JF, et al. A novel antagonist of CRTH2 blocks eosinophil release from bone marrow, chemotaxis and respiratory burst. Allergy. 2007;62:1401–1409. [PubMed]
61. Hirai H, et al. Prostaglandin D2 selectively induces chemotaxis in T helper type 2 cells, eosinophils, and basophils via seven-transmembrane receptor CRTH2. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:255–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Kagawa S, et al. Role of prostaglandin D2 receptor CRTH2 in sustained eosinophil accumulation in the airways of mice with chronic asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2011;155(Suppl 1):6–11. [PubMed]
63. Heinemann A, Schuligoi R, Sabroe I, Hartnell A, Peskar BA. Delta 12-prostaglandin J2, a plasma metabolite of prostaglandin D2, causes eosinophil mobilization from the bone marrow and primes eosinophils for chemotaxis. J. Immunol. 2003;170:4752–4758. [PubMed]
64. Sugimoto H, et al. An orally bioavailable small molecule antagonist of CRTH2, ramatroban (BAY u3405), inhibits prostaglandin D2-induced eosinophil migration in vitro. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003;305:347–352. [PubMed]
65. Schuligoi R, et al. CRTH2 and D-type prostanoid receptor antagonists as novel therapeutic agents for inflammatory diseases. Pharmacology. 2010;85:372–382. [PubMed]
66. Barnes N, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459 in moderate persistent asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2012;42:38–48. [PubMed]
67. Green RH, et al. Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1715–1721. [PubMed]
68. Straumann A, et al. 856 Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With the CRTH2-Antagonist Oc000459: A Novel Therapeutic Principle. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-147.
69. O'Reilly M, et al. Identification of a histamine H4 receptor on human eosinophils--role in eosinophil chemotaxis. J. Recept. Signal. Transduct. Res. 2002;22:431–448. [PubMed]
70. Ling P, et al. Histamine H4 receptor mediates eosinophil chemotaxis with cell shape change and adhesion molecule upregulation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;142:161–171. [PubMed]
71. Shin N, et al. INCB38579, a novel and potent histamine H(4) receptor small molecule antagonist with anti-inflammatory pain and anti-pruritic functions. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012;675:47–56. [PubMed]
72. Zampeli E, Tiligada E. The role of histamine H4 receptor in immune and inflammatory disorders. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;157:24–33. [PubMed]
73. Yu S, Stahl E, Li Q, Ouyang A. Antigen inhalation induces mast cells and eosinophils infiltration in the guinea pig esophageal epithelium involving histamine-mediated pathway. Life Sci. 2008;82:324–330. [PubMed]
74. Thurmond RL, Gelfand EW, Dunford PJ. The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in allergic inflammation: the search for new antihistamines. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008;7:41–53. [PubMed]
75. Finkelman FD, Hogan SP, Hershey GK, Rothenberg ME, Wills-Karp M. Importance of cytokines in murine allergic airway disease and human asthma. J. Immunol. 2010;184:1663–1674. [PubMed]
76. Sherrill JD, Rothenberg ME. Genetic dissection of eosinophilic esophagitis provides insight into disease pathogenesis and treatment strategies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;128:23–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Pope SM, et al. IL-13 induces eosinophil recruitment into the lung by an IL-5- and eotaxin-dependent mechanism. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001;108:594–601. [PubMed]
78. Pope SM, et al. Identification of a cooperative mechanism involving interleukin-13 and eotaxin-2 in experimental allergic lung inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13952–13961. [PubMed]
79. Blanchard C, et al. IL-13 involvement in eosinophilic esophagitis: transcriptome analysis and reversibility with glucocorticoids. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;120:1292–1300. [PubMed]
80. Huang SK, et al. IL-13 expression at the sites of allergen challenge in patients with asthma. J. Immunol. 1995;155:2688–2694. [PubMed]
81. Prieto J, et al. Increased interleukin-13 mRNA expression in bronchoalveolar lavage cells of atopic patients with mild asthma after repeated low-dose allergen provocations. Respir. Med. 2000;94:806–814. [PubMed]
82. Gauvreau GM, et al. Effects of interleukin-13 blockade on allergen-induced airway responses in mild atopic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2011;183:1007–1014. [PubMed]
83. Corren J, et al. Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:1088–1098. [PubMed]
84. Nicholson GC, et al. The effects of an anti-IL-13 mAb on cytokine levels and nasal symptoms following nasal allergen challenge. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;128:800–807. [PubMed]
85. Tomkinson A, et al. A murine IL-4 receptor antagonist that inhibits IL-4- and IL-13-induced responses prevents antigen-induced airway eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness. J. Immunol. 2001;166:5792–5800. [PubMed]
86. Munitz A, Brandt EB, Mingler M, Finkelman FD, Rothenberg ME. Distinct roles for IL-13 and IL-4 via IL-13 receptor alpha1 and the type II IL-4 receptor in asthma pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:7240–7245. [PubMed]
87. Corren J, et al. A randomized, controlled, phase 2 study of AMG 317, an IL-4Ralpha antagonist, in patients with asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2010;181:788–796. [PubMed]
88. Wenzel S, Wilbraham D, Fuller R, Getz EB, Longphre M. Effect of an interleukin-4 variant on late phase asthmatic response to allergen challenge in asthmatic patients: results of two phase 2a studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1422–1431. [PubMed]
89. Nair P, et al. Mepolizumab for prednisone-dependent asthma with sputum eosinophilia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:985–993. [PubMed]
90. Catley MC, Coote J, Bari M, Tomlinson KL. Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of asthma. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011;132:333–351. [PubMed]
91. Rothenberg ME, Hogan SP. The eosinophil. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006;24:147–174. [PubMed]
92. Takatsu K. Interleukin-5 and IL-5 receptor in health and diseases. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2011;87:463–485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Molfino NA, Gossage D, Kolbeck R, Parker JM, Geba GP. Molecular and clinical rationale for therapeutic targeting of interleukin-5 and its receptor. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2012;42:712–737. [PubMed]
94. Neves JS, Weller PF. Functional extracellular eosinophil granules: novel implications in eosinophil immunobiology. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009;21:694–699. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Stern M, Meagher L, Savill J, Haslett C. Apoptosis in human eosinophils. Programmed cell death in the eosinophil leads to phagocytosis by macrophages and is modulated by IL-5. J. Immunol. 1992;148:3543–3549. [PubMed]
96. Tai PC, Sun L, Spry CJ. Effects of IL-5, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-3 on the survival of human blood eosinophils in vitro. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1991;85:312–316. [PubMed]
97. Yamaguchi Y, et al. Analysis of the survival of mature human eosinophils: interleukin-5 prevents apoptosis in mature human eosinophils. Blood. 1991;78:2542–2547. [PubMed]
98. Assa'ad AH, et al. An antibody against IL-5 reduces numbers of esophageal intraepithelial eosinophils in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1593–1604. [PubMed]
99. Straumann A, et al. Anti-interleukin-5 antibody treatment (mepolizumab) in active eosinophilic oesophagitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Gut. 2010;59:21–30. [PubMed]
100. Gevaert P, et al. Mepolizumab, a humanized anti-IL-5 mAb, as a treatment option for severe nasal polyposis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;128:989–995. [PubMed]
101. Spergel JM, et al. Reslizumab in children and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;129:456–463. 463. [PubMed]
102. Kips JC, et al. Effect of SCH55700, a humanized anti-human interleukin-5 antibody, in severe persistent asthma: a pilot study. Am. J Respir. Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1655–1659. [PubMed]
103. Kolbeck R, et al. MEDI-563, a humanized anti-IL-5 receptor alpha mAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:1344–1353. [PubMed]
104. Busse WW, et al. Safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of MEDI-563, an anti-IL-5 receptor alpha antibody, in a phase I study of subjects with mild asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:1237–1244. [PubMed]
105. Imaoka H, et al. TPI ASM8 reduces eosinophil progenitors in sputum after allergen challenge. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2011;41:1740–1746. [PubMed]
106. Kole R, Krainer AR, Altman S. RNA therapeutics: beyond RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotides. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012;11:125–140. [PubMed]
107. Burnett JC, Rossi JJ. RNA-based therapeutics: current progress and future prospects. Chem. Biol. 2012;19:60–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
108. Graziewicz MA, et al. An endogenous TNF-alpha antagonist induced by splice-switching oligonucleotides reduces inflammation in hepatitis and arthritis mouse models. Mol. Ther. 2008;16:1316–1322. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
109. Bochner BS. Siglec-8 on human eosinophils and mast cells, and Siglec-F on murine eosinophils, are functionally related inhibitory receptors. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2009;39:317–324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Nutku E, Aizawa H, Hudson SA, Bochner BS. Ligation of Siglec-8: a selective mechanism for induction of human eosinophil apoptosis. Blood. 2003;101:5014–5020. [PubMed]
111. Zhang M, et al. Defining the in vivo function of Siglec-F, a CD33-related Siglec expressed on mouse eosinophils. Blood. 2007;109:4280–4287. [PubMed]
112. Zimmermann N, et al. Siglec-F antibody administration to mice selectively reduces blood and tissue eosinophils. Allergy. 2008;63:1156–1163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
113. Song DJ, et al. Anti-Siglec-F antibody inhibits oral egg allergen induced intestinal eosinophilic inflammation in a mouse model. Clin. Immunol. 2009;131:157–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
114. Kiwamoto T, Kawasaki N, Paulson JC, Bochner BS. Siglec-8 as a drugable target to treat eosinophil and mast cell-associated conditions. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012;135:327–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
115. Busse W, et al. Omalizumab, anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of severe allergic asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001;108:184–190. [PubMed]
116. Soler M, et al. The anti-IgE antibody omalizumab reduces exacerbations and steroid requirement in allergic asthmatics. Eur. Respir. J. 2001;18:254–261. [PubMed]
117. Holgate ST, et al. Efficacy and safety of a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin E antibody (omalizumab) in severe allergic asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2004;34:632–638. [PubMed]
118. Holgate ST, Djukanovic R, Casale T, Bousquet J. Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment with omalizumab in allergic diseases: an update on anti-inflammatory activity and clinical efficacy. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2005;35:408–416. [PubMed]
119. Djukanovic R, et al. Effects of treatment with anti-immunoglobulin E antibody omalizumab on airway inflammation in allergic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2004;170:583–593. [PubMed]
120. Massanari M, et al. Effect of omalizumab on peripheral blood eosinophilia in allergic asthma. Respir. Med. 2010;104:188–196. [PubMed]
121. Noga O, et al. Effect of omalizumab treatment on peripheral eosinophil and T-lymphocyte function in patients with allergic asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006;117:1493–1499. [PubMed]
122. Foroughi S, et al. Anti-IgE treatment of eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;120:594–601. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
123. Ravetch JV, Lanier LL. Immune inhibitory receptors. Science. 2000;290:84–89. [PubMed]
124. Cooper MD. Inhibition of immune cell function. Immunol. Rev. 2008;224:7–10. [PubMed]
125. Munitz A, Levi-Schaffer F. Inhibitory receptors on eosinophils: A direct hit to a possible Achilles heel? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007 [PubMed]
126. Munitz A. Inhibitory receptors on myeloid cells: new targets for therapy? Pharmacol. Ther. 2010;125:128–137. [PubMed]
127. Munitz A, et al. The inhibitory receptor IRp60 (CD300a) suppresses the effects of IL-5, GM-CSF, and eotaxin on human peripheral blood eosinophils. Blood. 2006;107:1996–2003. [PubMed]
128. Verjan GN, et al. SIRPalpha/CD172a regulates eosinophil homeostasis. J. Immunol. 2011;187:2268–2277. [PubMed]
129. Munitz A, McBride ML, Bernstein JS, Rothenberg ME. A dual activation and inhibition role for the paired immunoglobulin-like receptor B in eosinophils. Blood. 2008;111:5694–5703. [PubMed]
130. Bachelet I, Munitz A, Levi-Schaffer F. Abrogation of allergic reactions by a bispecific antibody fragment linking IgE to CD300a. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006;117:1314–1320. [PubMed]
131. Park LS, et al. Cloning of the murine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor: Formation of a functional heteromeric complex requires interleukin 7 receptor. J. Exp. Med. 2000;192:659–670. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
132. Soumelis V, et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:673–680. [PubMed]
133. Rimoldi M, et al. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:507–514. [PubMed]
134. Zhang Y, Zhou B. Functions of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in immunity and disease. Immunol. Res. 2012;52:211–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
135. Osborn MJ, et al. Overexpression of murine TSLP impairs lymphopoiesis and myelopoiesis. Blood. 2004;103:843–851. [PubMed]
136. Wong CK, Hu S, Cheung PF, Lam CW. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin induces chemotactic and prosurvival effects in eosinophils: implications in allergic inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010;43:305–315. [PubMed]
137. Morshed M, Yousefi S, Stockle C, Simon HU, Simon D. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin stimulates the formation of eosinophil extracellular traps. Allergy. 2012 [PubMed]
138. Gudbjartsson DF, et al. Sequence variants affecting eosinophil numbers associate with asthma and myocardial infarction. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:342–347. [PubMed]
139. Rothenberg ME, et al. Common variants at 5q22 associate with pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:289–291. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
140. Klion AD, et al. Familial eosinophilia: a benign disorder? Blood. 2004;103:4050–4055. [PubMed]
141. Bates ME, et al. Human airway eosinophils respond to chemoattractants with greater eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release, adherence to fibronectin, and activation of the Ras-ERK pathway when compared with blood eosinophils. J. Immunol. 2010;184:7125–7133. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
142. Sedgwick JB, et al. Comparison of airway and blood eosinophil function after in vivo antigen challenge. J. Immunol. 1992;149:3710–3718. [PubMed]
143. Coffer PJ, Koenderman L. Granulocyte signal transduction and priming: cause without effect? Immunol. Lett. 1997;57:27–31. [PubMed]
144. Kariyawasam HH, Robinson DS. The eosinophil: the cell and its weapons, the cytokines, its locations. Semin. Respir. Crit Care Med. 2006;27:117–127. [PubMed]
145. Stein ML, et al. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy reduces eosinophil activation ex vivo and increases IL-5 and IL-5 receptor levels. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:1473–1483. 1483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
146. Pecaric-Petkovic T, Didichenko SA, Kaempfer S, Spiegl N, Dahinden CA. Human basophils and eosinophils are the direct target leukocytes of the novel IL-1 family member IL-33. Blood. 2009;113:1526–1534. [PubMed]
147. Cherry WB, Yoon J, Bartemes KR, Iijima K, Kita H. A novel IL-1 family cytokine, IL-33, potently activates human eosinophils. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:1484–1490. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
148. Stolarski B, Kurowska-Stolarska M, Kewin P, Xu D, Liew FY. IL-33 exacerbates eosinophil-mediated airway inflammation. J. Immunol. 2010;185:3472–3480. [PubMed]
149. Kim YH, et al. Anti-IL-33 antibody has a therapeutic effect in a murine model of allergic rhinitis. Allergy. 2012;67:183–190. [PubMed]
150. Liu X, et al. Anti-IL-33 antibody treatment inhibits airway inflammation in a murine model of allergic asthma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;386:181–185. [PubMed]
151. Yin H, et al. Adenovirus-mediated delivery of soluble ST2 attenuates ovalbumin-induced allergic asthma in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2012;170:1–9. [PubMed]
152. Kang JH, et al. Regulation of functional phenotypes of cord blood derived eosinophils by gamma-secretase inhibitor. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007;37:571–577. [PubMed]
153. Radke AL, et al. Mature human eosinophils express functional Notch ligands mediating eosinophil autocrine regulation. Blood. 2009;113:3092–3101. [PubMed]
154. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999;284:770–776. [PubMed]
155. Eagar TN, et al. Notch 1 signaling regulates peripheral T cell activation. Immunity. 2004;20:407–415. [PubMed]
156. Kang JH, et al. Eosinophilic differentiation is promoted by blockage of Notch signaling with a gamma-secretase inhibitor. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005;35:2982–2990. [PubMed]
157. Siemers ER, et al. Effects of a gamma-secretase inhibitor in a randomized study of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;66:602–604. [PubMed]
158. Cameron L, et al. Evidence for local eosinophil differentiation within allergic nasal mucosa: inhibition with soluble IL-5 receptor. J. Immunol. 2000;164:1538–1545. [PubMed]
159. Robinson DS, et al. CD34(+)/interleukin-5Ralpha messenger RNA+ cells in the bronchial mucosa in asthma: potential airway eosinophil progenitors. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1999;20:9–13. [PubMed]
160. Allakhverdi Z, et al. CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells are potent effectors of allergic inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;123:472–478. [PubMed]
161. Menzies-Gow A, et al. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) therapy induces bone marrow eosinophil maturational arrest and decreases eosinophil progenitors in the bronchial mucosa of atopic asthmatics. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003;111:714–719. [PubMed]
162. Mejia R, Nutman TB. Evaluation and differential diagnosis of marked, persistent eosinophilia. Semin. Hematol. 2012;49:149–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
163. Simon HU, et al. Refining the definition of hypereosinophilic syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;126:45–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
164. Caldwell JM, et al. Glucocorticoid-regulated genes in eosinophilic esophagitis: a role for FKBP51. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:879–888. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
165. Blanchard C, et al. A striking local esophageal cytokine expression profile in eosinophilic esophagitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011;127:208–217. 217. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
166. Rothenberg ME. Biology and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1238–1249. [PubMed]
167. Dellon ES, Chen X, Miller CR, Woosley JT, Shaheen NJ. Diagnostic Utility of Major Basic Protein, Eotaxin-3, and Leukotriene Enzyme Staining in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
168. Valent P, et al. Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;130:607–612. [PubMed]
169. Roufosse F, Weller PF. Practical approach to the patient with hypereosinophilia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;126:39–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
170. Klion AD. How I treat hypereosinophilic syndromes. Blood. 2009;114:3736–3741. [PubMed]