|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and rosacea were complicated by barrier abrogation and deficiency in innate immunity. The first defender of epidermal innate immune response is the antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that exhibit a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against multiple pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses, and fungi. The deficiency of these AMPs in the skin of AD fails to protect our body against virulent pathogen infections. In contrast to AD where there is a suppression of AMPs, rosacea is characterized by overexpression of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP), the products of which result in chronic epidermal inflammation. In this regard, AMP generation that is controlled by a key ceramide metabolite S1P-dependent mechanism could be considered as alternate therapeutic approaches to treat these skin disorders, i.e., Increased S1P levels strongly stimulated the CAMP expression which elevated the antimicrobial activity against multiple pathogens resulting the improved AD patient skin.
The skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) is highly susceptible to colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. The defense system of the skin against bacterial invasion is significantly disrupted in AD. The high incidence of S. aureus colonization was also observed in the decrease of IgA and the slight change toward an alkaline pH in AD skin. Recently, another important association between sphingolipid metabolites and the defense mechanism against S. aureus colonization has been ascribed to decreased levels of ceramide which reflects possible alteration of sphingolipid metabolites in the AD skin. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress stimulates the production of cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP), the proapoptotic sphingolipids, ceramide and sphingosine as well as an antiapoptotic sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). In previous studies, a variety of external perturbations including ER stress stimulated the production of ceramides (Uchida et al., 2003; Lei et al., 2008; Uchida et al., 2010). Recently, we also suggested the CAMP production via a novel NF-κB- and C/EBPα-mediated pathway independent of vitamin D receptor mediated mechanism (Park et al., 2011). Interestingly, sphingolipid metabolites especially ceramides were converted into sphingosine by ceramidase or dephosphorylated from S1P by S1P phosphohydrolase-1 in subtoxic levels of ER stress (Lepine et al., 2011). Therefore, sphingolipid metabolites ceramides, sphingosine and S1P were possibly involved in triggering innate immunity in skin.
Here, we introduce the antimicrobial peptides released from skin epithelial cells in relation to the activation or upregulation of their defense mechanism mediated by the sphingolipid signaling molecules in AD.
Mammalian epithelial tissues, such as intestine, respiratory tract, reproductive tract, mucosal epithelia and skin, are positioned at the interface with the external environment, where they continuously encounter exogenous microbial pathogens. These tissues have developed protective mechanisms that include antimicrobial peptides (AMP) (also called host defense peptides) that exhibit a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against multiple pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, enveloped viruses and even transformed or cancerous cells. (Liu et al., 2013). In addition to antimicrobial activity, it has been highlighted that AMPs have the ability to enhance innate/adaptive immunity by functioning as immunomodulators (Beignon et al., 2001). In human and other mammals, the two main AMP families are defensin and CAMP. Defensins are widely distributed in mammalian epithelial cells and phagocytes (Ali et al., 2001). CAMP is a structurally and evolutionarily distinct antimicrobial peptide that is similar to defensins in abundance and distribution. In addition to CAMP and defensins, additional antimicrobial peptides also exist which including histatins (de Sousa-Pereira et al., 2013), dermcidin (Schittek et al., 2001; Zeth, 2013) and anionic peptides. However, these antimicrobial peptides are restricted to a few animal species and tissues. In this review, the major characteristics of two major epidermal AMP families, β-defensins and CAMP will be present and discussed.
The defensins, which have six conserved cysteine residues, are small and cationic peptides that are divided into three subfamilies, α-, β-, and θ-defensin based on the pairing of the cysteine residues to form three disulfide bridges (α-defensin [cys1-cys6, cys2-cys4, cys3-cys5], β-defensin [cys1-cys5, cys2-cys4, cys3-cys6], θ-defensin [cys1-cys1, cys2-cys3, cys2-cys3]) (Ali et al., 2001; Huh et al., 2002; Fazakerley et al., 2010). Six α-defensins have been identified from five genes in human, human neutrophil peptide (HNP)-1, HNP-2, HNP-3, HNP-4, and human defensin (HD)-5, and HD-6. The α-defensins are mainly produced by neutrophils and to our knowledge are not found in keratinocytes, which are human epidermal skin cells. Whereas, human β-defensins (hBDs) are encoded by more than 30 β-defensin genes (DEFBs) and the keratinocytes express hBD-1 through hBD-3 (Table 1). Unlike α- and β-defensins those are found in humans, the θ-defensin protein product has not been identified in humans.
hBD-1 is constitutively expressed in human skin, whereas both hBD-2 and hBD-3 are inducible AMP in epidermis dependent on a number of factors, including pathogenic bacteria, cytokines, growth factors or external stresses such as UVB irradiation. These factors have shown to differentially induce hBDs production in the skin. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 has been noted to recognize lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that induce hBD-2, not hBD-3, expression in keratinocytes (Luo et al., 2012). Moreover, hBD-2 production was mainly regulated by IL-1, whereas hBD-3 induction is influenced primarily by IL-6 and epidermal growth factors, indicating that different stimulators and regulatory mechanisms are responsible for the generation of various hBDs (Harder et al., 2000; Pioli et al., 2006; Ahn et al., 2013). hBD3 has potent antimicrobial activity against exogenous microbial pathogens, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, while hBD2 has no noted effects against Gram-positive Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, which is the virulent bacteria that colonizes approximately 90% of AD patients (Fazakerley et al., 2010; Ong, 2010).
The properties of CAMP were first discovered in porcine (Ritonja et al., 1989), CAMP has been continuously investigated and found in multiple other mammalian species, e.g., rabbit (Larrick et al., 1991), humans (Larrick et al., 1995), sheep (Bagella et al., 1995), mice (Popsueva et al., 1996), monkeys (Bals et al., 2001), and recently in dogs (Sang et al., 2007). These mammalian CAMPs are small, cationic, and amphipathic peptides, which range in size <100 amino acid residues. In humans, there is a single CAMP gene, which encodes the inactive precursor protein, known as CAP18. This inactive precursor consists of an N-terminal cathelin domain and a C-terimal peptide domain. Local proteases, e.g., serine protease 3, kalikerin-5 or -7, cleave the C-terminal domain from the inactive precursor CAP18 to form active AMP such as LL-37, which is responsible for antimicrobial activity (Table 1) (Glaser et al., 2005; Radek et al., 2008; Segaert, 2008; Wittersheim et al., 2013).
Epidermal CAMP is minimally detected in intact, unperturbed skin but significantly upregulated in response to exogenous infections, wounding, and permeability barrier perturbation. It has been well established that the Vitamin D3-induced Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) activation is the primary transcriptional regulatory mechanism of CAMP production in the skin (Martineau et al., 2007; Heilborn et al., 2010; Kanda et al., 2012). In general, while Vitamin D3 is synthesized from 7-dehydrocholesterol in human skin upon exposure of UVB irradiation, with the two key enzymes being vitamin D 25-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) in liver and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) in kidney. Both enzymes are required to form active Vitamin D3, 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1,25D3) (Lehmann et al., 1999; Kragballe, 2002; Vantieghem et al., 2006). In particular, CYP27B1 which can activate 1,25D3 is also expressed in keratinocytes and is under the control of the signals that occur in bacterial infection or injury in the skin. Activated 1,25D3 binds to the VDR and recruits transcriptional coactivator proteins such as steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) 3. This result is in the formation of a complex with activated VDR, leading to initiate CAMP expression and function (Fig. 1).
In addition to VDR-dependent mechanism, we have discovered that the subtoxic external perturbations such as UVB irradiation that induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and increase cellular ceramide production in parallel with stimulated metabolic conversion of sphingosine to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) lead to enhanced CAMP generation via an NF-κB activation, independent of the VDR pathway (Fig. 1) (Uchida et al., 2010). In addition to VDR, several consensus transcription factor-binding sequences, including C/EBP, are present on the promoter region of CAMP, but an NF-κB binding element has not been identified in the region that includes the 693 bp upstream from the transcription initiating site. Since NF-κB binding site(s) is not present within the CAMP promoter, the ER stress-induced activation of NF-κB could not directly bind to the promoter region; instead, NF-κB activation induces C/EBPα via p38 MAP kinase (Hayakawa et al., 2010; Garcia-Garcia et al., 2012). Although a detailed mechanism of how the ER stress-mediated increases in S1P activate NF-κB still remains unresolved, our recent studies further demonstrated that CAMP generation likely occurs by an S1P receptor independent mechanism (Park et al., 2013). Moreover, VDR- and S1P/NF-κB-dependent mechanism are not operating simultaneously in response to ER stress, both pathways could alternatively regulate CAMP expression depending upon cellular environments, i.e. under basal (unstressed) vs. under stressed conditions in the skin (Fig. 1).
A number of previous studies have revealed that CAMP is a major epidermal AMP with the most potent antimicrobial activity against virulent S. aureus, and a multifunctional peptide that also modulates cytokine production, cellular differentiation, and adaptive immunity (Table 1). Furthermore, recent studies revealed that CAMP combined with hBD-2 has synergistic antimicrobial activity by effectively killing S. aureus (Kim et al., 2009; Goo et al., 2010).
AD is the most common inflammatory skin disease and is characterized by T helper type 2 (Th2) cytokine-mediated inflammations and significant barrier disruption. Since Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, which are highly expressed in AD skin and suppress key epidermal AMPs, e.g., hBD-2, hBD-3, and CAMP, expression levels of these AMPs decline in AD skin as compared to healthy skin (Reinholz et al., 2012; Lancto et al., 2013). Decreased expression of AMPs can explain the increased susceptibility of AD patients to bacterial infection, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which poses a significant community health problem for atopic dermatitis patients since treatment is difficult. In contrast to AD, CAMP is strongly overexpressed in the skin of rosacea patient compared to the skin of healthy controls (Meyer-Hoffert and Schroder, 2011). However, levels of hBDs in rosacea patient do not differ from healthy controls. As presented above, the active form LL-37, which is cleaved from the inactive precursor CAP18 by serine proteases, can be further processed to smaller peptide fragments and has pro-inflammatory response. In addition, increased expression/activity of serine proteases such as serine protease 3 and kalikerin-5 have been found in skin lesions of rosacea patients (Yamasaki et al., 2007; Morizane et al., 2010). Although further studies are needed to show how cutaneous serine proteases are activated in rosacea, increased CAMP expression due to enhanced serine protease activity can explain why patients suffering from rosacea show chronic inflammation.
The stratum corneum (SC) is the outmost upper layer of the skin and provides the rate-limiting barrier function for penetration into and out of the skin. The SC of the skin contains relatively high amounts of ceramides as much as 50% of total skin lipids (Bouwstra et al., 1999). Ceramides in skin exist both in the free form and bound to proteins. Interestingly, skin ceramides have unique structures which are not reported in other tissues. Typical skin ceramides structures contain the long-chain fatty acids linked to sphingosine or phytosphingosine (Stewart and Downing, 1999). Some of fatty acids with 2-hydroxyl group were also observed in skin ceramides structure (Huang and Chang, 2008). In addition, there are O-acyl ceramides structure consisted with a long-chain fatty acids, having a terminal hydroxyl group which esterified either with linoleate or a 2-hydroxy acid (Janusova et al., 2011) (Fig. 2).
These ceramides have an essential function in the skin barrier properties, inhibiting water loss and protecting ingress of potentially harmful substances. This barrier functions have been impaired in skin diseases such as psoriasis and AD, presumably caused by an altered lipid composition and organization (Farwanah et al., 2005). Indeed, the skin barrier disruption has been attributed to decreased levels of ceramides in SC of AD patients (Kita et al., 2002).
Among various sphingoid bases, only sphingosine was clearly and profoundly effective against Staphylococcus aureus (4-log reduction at 20 μM; 2-log reduction at 2.5 μM) (Arikawa et al., 2002). The sphingosine was similarly active against Streptococcus pyogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Propionibacterium acnes, Brevibacterium epidermidis, and Candida albicans, moderately active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and ineffective against Escherichia coli and Serratia marcescens (Bibel et al., 1992a). The positively charged structure of 2-amino position in sphingosine is responsible for enzyme inhibition such as a protein-kinase system because there was no activity at pH higher than 8.0 and N-acetyl sphingosine was ineffective, suggesting this chemical structure is important in antimicrobial activity (Bottega et al., 1989; Igarashi et al., 1989). In addition, both erythro- and threo-isomers were effective and essentially required Ca2+ ion for antimicrobial activity. Therefore, the existence of sphingosine in the SC suggests that sphingosine may have a major role in the resistance of skin to colocalization and infection by microorganisms (Bibel et al., 1992b, Bibel et al., 1993). The levels of sphingosine in the SC are regulated by two factors; the hydrolysis of ceramides to sphingosine by acidic ceramidase (CDase) and ceramides levels as a substrate pool. Actually, the levels of sphingosine are significantly down-regulated to 140-160 μM in SC of AD patients, compared with healthy controls (268 μM). This suggests that the decreased levels of ceramides and reduced activities of acidic CDase are in part associated with the deficiency of sphingosine in the skin of AD patients (Arikawa et al., 2002).
In skin, sphingosine can be phosphorylated by sphingosine kinases into S1P, which acting both the maintenance of the epidermal permeability and as a critical signaling molecule, which binds to a family of G-protein coupled receptors, termed S1PR1-S1PR5 (Maceyka et al., 2009). This S1P signaling via S1P receptors (S1PRs) significantly regulate the immunosuppressive action by causing lymphophenia as demonstrated by a S1PR1 agonist, FTY720 (Fingolimod) treatment in vivo (Bohler et al., 2003). The immunosuppressive ligand S1P is irreversibly metabolized into hexadecenal and ethanolamine phosphate by S1P lyase (Schwab et al., 2005) (Fig. 3). Therefore, the regulation of S1P lyase activity may mainly control the intracellular S1P concentrations (Berdyshev et al., 2011). Therefore, S1P lyase activity may also exhibit a central role for the regulation of immunological disorders, suggesting that an imbalance in the S1P-S1P lyase axis may directly related to the incidence of skin diseases. Interestingly, the S1P lyase mRNA and S1P lyase activity were greatly enhanced in atopic skin lesions in humans, supposing that S1P concentration in AD patients skin may be much less compared to healthy skin (Baumer et al., 2011). In this report, the S1P concentration in lesional skin of dogs suffering from AD was significantly lower, 0.18 nmol/mg protein while healthy skin was 0.63 nmol/mg protein.
In a recent paper, we demonstrated that ER stresses by cell-permeable ceramide (C2Cer) in human keratinocytes upregulated the mRNA expression of CAMP as well as the endogenous sphingosine in 10-fold concentrations and S1P in 1.3-fold increase (Park et al., 2013). In this conditions, the inhibition of S1P lyase activity by siRNA treatment profoundly increased S1P level, indicating the possible involvement of sphingolipid metabolites, ceramides, sphingosine and S1P for the induction of CAMP mRNA and protein expression. Especially the enzyme of sphingosine kinase type 1 (SK-1) which produce S1P was significantly activated in CAMP expression in human keratinocytes which were treated with C2Cer. In addition, a pharmaceutical inhibitor (SKI) or siRNA treatment of SK-1 attenuated CAMP expression in cells. From in vivo studies using S1P lyase-deficient mouse skin, C2Cer (7.5 μM) treatment induced ER stress and subsequently increased the protein and mRNA levels of CAMP compared to vehicle. Exogenously added S1P or synthetic S1PR1 ligands (SEW 2871) did not enhanced CAMP mRNA expression. These results suggested that S1P regulation of enhanced CAMP expression may not be related to S1P receptor-mediated S1P signaling pathway.
Taken together, the antimicrobial peptide, CAMP is an indispensable factor of the skin’s innate immune defense system against microorganisms’ infection. Previously, the CAMP protein in keratinocytes is regulated by vitamin D3 through the vitamin D receptor (Gombart et al., 2005). We newly identified S1P as an ER-stress signaling molecule which increases production of CAMP when the epidermis is under stress; e.g., UV exposure (D'Orazio et al., 2013; Wallingford et al., 2013), wound healing (Kawanabe et al., 2007), or attack by microorganisms (Arikawa et al., 2002). Identification of this new signaling mechanism will allow the development of new topical compounds, both synthetic and natural, that could be used to enhance epidermal innate immunity and antimicrobial defense, when the skin is under microbial attack from the outside.
This work was supported by research grant of the Chungbuk National University in 2010.